Next Article in Journal
Challenges to the Fight against Rabies—The Landscape of Policy and Prevention Strategies in Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Physical Activity, Mental Health, and Well-Being in Very Pre-Term and Term Born Adolescents: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Two Accelerometry Studies
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Impacts of Agricultural Capitalization on Regional Paddy Field Change: A Production-Factor Substitution Perspective

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 1729; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041729
by Xinyi Li 1, Xiong Wang 1 and Xiaoqing Song 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 1729; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041729
Submission received: 26 December 2020 / Revised: 5 February 2021 / Accepted: 6 February 2021 / Published: 10 February 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

 

Please find comments atached.

 

Regards

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors,

It is necessary that Authors use data for explain their main objective.
Some results must be scientifically improved.

Line 149. I made a comment in about urbanization acceleration. 

Line 150. Please explain

Line 166. Explain about variable crops and credit

Line 169. Crops diversity must be define.

Line 321. Term definition

Line 363. Please explain Figure 4

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The title of the paper clearly reflect its contents and keywords demonstrate the significance of the research. The topic of paddy fields in China is of great importance for ensuring food security and environmental sustainability.

The abstract is sufficiently informative, covering almost all sections: purpose, methodological approach, results, and conclusions. Some recommendations/practical implications/limitations should be added.

The authors provide a summary of the current research literature (about paddy field use changes in Southeast Asia) to provide the context. In-text citations are missing between lines 53-57.

In the introduction part of the article, the authors mentioned that there are few studies on the driving mechanisms of regional paddy field use changes based on the perspective of production-factor substitution. Therefore, the present study is completely justified.

The research question and the hypothesis are missing. These should be formulated by the authors and inserted at the end of introduction part.

In-text citations are missing in the section entitled „Study area”.

There is no source mentionned for figure 1.

The authors should be more carreful to the citations in the text: e.g. “(http://www.resdc.cn/).

Please read carrefully the instructions for authors: “In the text, reference numbers should be placed in square brackets [ ], and placed before the punctuation; for example [1], [1–3] or [1,3].

The statistical analysis is appropriate, but it should be more explained in the methodology part.

The results are clearly presented and appropriately analysed.

The paper clearly identify practical implications for the rural society. It could have an economic, social and environmental impact thus improving the quality of life.

I suggest stronger links with the findings in the literature (in the discussion section). The authors should mention some aspects about the limitation of the study.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

Thank you for taking my comments into account.

Regards

 

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear authors,

Your paper was significantly improved according to reviewers suggestions. Congratulations for your work! It is a very interesting paper  with practical implications for the local economy.

Back to TopTop