Use of Intervention Mapping for Occupational Risk Prevention and Health Promotion: A Systematic Review of Literature
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- What is the fidelity of the use of the intervention mapping protocol regarding the core IM characteristics (participation, theory-based approach, ecological approach, implementation planning)?
- To what extent are interventions developed following the IM protocol successfully implemented?
- To what extent are interventions developed following the IM protocol effective?
- Is the level of fidelity to the IM-protocol related to the implementation success and to the effectiveness of the interventions?
2. Methods
2.1. Literature Search
2.2. Data Extraction and Synthesis
2.3. Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Included Articles
3.2. Intervention Design According to IM Protocol
3.3. Participation
3.4. Theory Based
3.5. Ecological Approach
3.6. Implementation Planning
3.7. Overall IM Fidelity
3.8. Evaluation of Implementation Process
3.9. Evaluation of Effects of the Intervention
3.10. Relation between Intervention Design, Implementation, and Effect
4. Discussion
4.1. Fidelity of the IM Protocol
4.2. Relation Fidelity IM-Protocol, Implementation and Intervention Effect
4.3. Strengths and Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Heuvel, S.; Zwaan, L.; van Dam, L.; Oude-Hengel, K.; Eekhout, I.; van Emmerik, M.; Oldenburg, C.; Brück, C.; Janowski, P.; Wilhelm, C. Estimating the Costs of Work-Related Accidents and Ill-Health: An Analysis of European Data Sources; No.: 9292409975; European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA): Luxembourg, 2017.
- Richardson, K.M.; Rothstein, H.R. Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2008, 13, 69–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biron, C.; Karanika-Murray, M. Process evaluation for organizational stress and well-being interventions: Implications for theory, method, and practice. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2014, 21, 85–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Westgaard, R.; Winkel, J. Occupational musculoskeletal and mental health: Significance of rationalization and opportunities to create sustainable production systems—A systematic review. Appl. Ergon. 2011, 42, 261–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craig, P.; Dieppe, P.; Macintyre, S.; Michie, S.; Nazareth, I.; Petticrew, M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337, a1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Glasgow, R.E.; Vogt, T.M.; Boles, S.M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am. J. Public Health 1999, 89, 1322–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Michie, S.; Van Stralen, M.M.; West, R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 2011, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Green, L.W.; Kreuter, M.; Deeds, S.G.; Partridge, K.B. Health education planning: A diagnostic approach. In Health Education Planning: A Diagnostic Approach; Mayfield Publishing Company: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1980; p. 306. [Google Scholar]
- Bartholomew, L.K.B.; Markham, C.M.; Ruiter, R.A.; Fernández, M.E.; Kok, G.; Parcel, G.S. Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach; John Wiley & Sons: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Garba, R.M.; Gadanya, M.A. The role of intervention mapping in designing disease prevention interventions: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lamort-Bouché, M.; Sarnin, P.; Kok, G.; Rouat, S.; Péron, J.; Letrilliart, L.; Fassier, J.-B. Interventions developed with the Intervention Mapping protocol in the field of cancer: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology 2018, 27, 1138–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Doorn, R.R.; Massar, K.; Kok, G. Gedragsverandering binnen organisaties: Kan intervention mapping een bijdrage leveren aan het ontwikkelen van effectieve interventies? [Behavioral change within organizations: Can Intervention Mapping contribute to the development of effective interventions?]. Gedrag Organ. 2018, 31, 117–133. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez, M.E.; Hoor, G.A.T.; Van Lieshout, S.; Rodriguez, S.A.; Beidas, R.S.; Parcel, G.; Ruiter, R.A.C.; Markham, C.M.; Kok, G. Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies. Front. Public Health 2019, 7, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fassier, J.-B.; Sarnin, P.; Rouat, S.; Péron, J.; Kok, G.; Letrilliart, L.; Lamort-Bouché, M. Interventions Developed with the Intervention Mapping Protocol in Work Disability Prevention: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Occup. Rehabil. 2019, 29, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steckler, A.B.; Linnan, L.; Israel, B. Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Kwak, L.; Kremers, S.P.J.; Werkman, A.; Visscher, T.L.S.; Van Baak, M.A.; Brug, J. The NHF-NRG In Balance-project: The application of Intervention Mapping in the development, implementation and evaluation of weight gain prevention at the worksite. Obes. Rev. 2007, 8, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strijk, J.E.; Proper, K.I.; Van Der Beek, A.J.; Van Mechelen, W. The Vital@Work Study. The systematic development of a lifestyle intervention to improve older workers’ vitality and the design of a randomised controlled trial evaluating this intervention. BMC Public Health 2009, 9, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Viester, L.; Verhagen, E.; Proper, K.I.; Van Dongen, J.M.; Bongers, P.M.; Van Der Beek, A.J. VIP in construction: Systematic development and evaluation of a multifaceted health programme aiming to improve physical activity levels and dietary patterns among construction workers. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McEachan, R.; Lawton, R.; Jackson, C.; Conner, M.; Lunt, J. Evidence, Theory and Context: Using intervention mapping to develop a worksite physical activity intervention. BMC Public Health 2008, 8, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- van Berkel, J.; Proper, K.I.; Boot, C.R.; Bongers, P.M.; van der Beek Allard, J. Mindful “Vitality in Practice”: An intervention to improve the work engagement and energy balance among workers; the development and design of the randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Coffeng, J.K.; Hendriksen, I.J.; Duijts, S.F.A.; Proper, K.I.; Van Mechelen, W.; Boot, C.R. The development of the Be Active & Relax “Vitality in Practice” (VIP) project and design of an RCT to reduce the need for recovery in office employees. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oude Hengel, K.M.; Joling, C.I.; Proper, K.I.; van der Molen Henk, F.; Bongers, P.M. Intervention mapping as a framework for developing an intervention at the worksite for older construction workers. Am. J. Health Promot. 2011, 26, e1–e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verweij, L.M.; Proper, K.I.; Weel, A.; Hulshof, C.T.; Van Mechelen, W. Design of the Balance@Work project: Systematic development, evaluation and implementation of an occupational health guideline aimed at the prevention of weight gain among employees. BMC Public Health 2009, 9, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Looijmans-van den Akker, I.; Hulscher, M.E.; Verheij, T.J.; Riphagen-Dalhuisen, J.; van Delden, J.J.; Hak, E. How to develop a program to increase influenza vaccine uptake among workers in health care settings? Implement. Sci. 2011, 6, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Riphagen-Dalhuisen, J.; Frijstein, G.; Van Der Geest-Blankert, A.D.J.; Danhof-Pont, M.B.; De Jager, H.; Bos, N.; Smeets, E.; De Vries, M.; Gallee, P.; Hak, E. Planning and process evaluation of a multi-faceted influenza vaccination implementation strategy for health care workers in acute health care settings. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brosseau, L.M.; Parker, D.; Samant, Y.; Pan, W. Mapping Safety Interventions in Metalworking Shops. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2007, 49, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oude Hengel, K.M.; Van Deurssen, E.; Meijster, T.; Tielemans, E.; Heederik, D.; Pronk, A. ‘Relieved Working’ study: Systematic development and design of an intervention to decrease occupational quartz exposure at construction worksites. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oude Hengel, K.M.; Blatter, B.M.; Joling, C.I.; Van der Beek Allard, J.; Bongers, P.M. Effectiveness of an intervention at construction worksites on work engagement, social support, physical workload, and need for recovery: Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Oude Hengel, K.M.; Blatter, B.M.; van der Molen Henk, F.; Bongers, P.M.; van der Beek Allard, J. The effectiveness of a construction worksite prevention program on work ability, health, and sick leave: Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2013, 39, 456–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oude Hengel, K.M.; Blatter, B.M.; van der Molen Henk, F.; Joling, C.I.; Proper, K.I.; Bongers, P.M.; van der Beek, A.J. Meeting the challenges of implementing an intervention to promote work ability and health-related quality of life at construction worksites: A process evaluation. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2011, 53, 1483–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Coffeng, J.K.; Hendriksen, I.J.; Duijts, S.F.A.; Twisk, J.W.; Van Mechelen, W.; Boot, C.R.L. Effectiveness of a Combined Social and Physical Environmental Intervention on Presenteeism, Absenteeism, Work Performance, and Work Engagement in Office Employees. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2014, 56, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coffeng, J.K.; Boot, C.R.L.; Duijts, S.F.A.; Twisk, J.W.R.; Van Mechelen, W.; Hendriksen, I.J.M. Effectiveness of a Worksite Social & Physical Environment Intervention on Need for Recovery, Physical Activity and Relaxation; Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coffeng, J.K.; Hendriksen, I.J.; Van Mechelen, W.; Boot, C.R. Process Evaluation of a Worksite Social and Physical Environmental Intervention. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2013, 55, 1409–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Berkel, J.; Boot, C.R.; Proper, K.I.; Bongers, P.M.; van der Beek Allard, J. Effectiveness of a worksite mindfulness-based multi-component intervention on lifestyle behaviors. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014, 11, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- van Berkel, J.; Boot, C.R.; Proper, K.I.; Bongers, P.M.; van der Beek, A.J. Effectiveness of a worksite mindfulness-related multi-component health promotion intervention on work engagement and mental health: Results of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- van Berkel, J.; Boot, C.R.; Proper, K.I.; Bongers, P.M.; van der Beek, A.J. Process evaluation of a workplace health promotion intervention aimed at improving work engagement and energy balance. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2013, 55, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- van Deurssen, E.; Meijster, T.; Oude Hengel, K.M.; Boessen, R.; Spaan, S.; Tielemans, E.; Heederik, D.; Pronk, A. Effectiveness of a multidimensional randomized control intervention to reduce quartz exposure among construction workers. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2015, 59, 959–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Deurssen, E.H.; Pronk, A.; Meijster, T.; Tielemans, E.; Heederik, D.; Oude Hengel, K.M. Process evaluation of an intervention program to reduce occupational quartz exposure among Dutch construction workers. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2015, 57, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McEachan, R.; Lawton, R.; Jackson, C.; Conner, M.; Meads, D.; West, R. Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2011, 8, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lawton, R.; McEachan, R.; Jackson, C.; West, R.; Conner, M. Intervention fidelity and effectiveness of a UK worksite physical activity intervention funded by the Bupa Foundation, UK. Health Promot. Int. 2014, 30, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Verweij, L.M.; Proper, K.I.; Weel, A.N.H.; Hulshof, C.T.J.; Van Mechelen, W. The application of an occupational health guideline reduces sedentary behaviour and increases fruit intake at work: Results from an RCT. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012, 69, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verweij, L.M.; Proper, K.I.; Weel, A.N.H.; Hulshof, C.T.J.; Van Mechelen, W. Long-term effects of an occupational health guideline on employees’ body weight-related outcomes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and quality of life: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health 2013, 39, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verweij, L.M.; Proper, K.I.; Hulshof, C.T.; Van Mechelen, W. Process Evaluation of an Occupational Health Guideline Aimed at Preventing Weight Gain Among Employees. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2011, 53, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verweij, L.M.; Proper, K.I.; Leffelaar, E.R.; Weel, A.N.; Nauta, A.P.; Hulshof, C.T.; Van Mechelen, W. Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of an Occupational Health Guideline Aimed at Preventing Weight Gain Among Employees in the Netherlands. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012, 54, 954–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viester, L.; Verhagen, E.; Bongers, P.M.; Van Der Beek, A.J. The effect of a health promotion intervention for construction workers on work-related outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2015, 88, 789–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viester, L.; Verhagen, E.A.L.M.; Bongers, P.M.; Van Der Beek, A.J. Process Evaluation of a Multifaceted Health Program Aiming to Improve Physical Activity Levels and Dietary Patterns Among Construction Workers. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2014, 56, 1210–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Strijk, J.E.; Proper, K.I.; van der Beek, A.J.; van Mechelen, W. A worksite vitality intervention to improve older workers’ lifestyle and vitality-related outcomes: Results of a randomised controlled trial. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2012, 66, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strijk, J.E.; Proper, K.I.; van Mechelen, W.; van der Beek Allard, J. Effectiveness of a worksite lifestyle intervention on vitality, work engagement, productivity, and sick leave: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2013, 39, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Strijk, J.E.; Proper, K.I.; van der Beek Allard, J.; van Mechelen, W. A process evaluation of a worksite vitality intervention among ageing hospital workers. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2011, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Parker, D.L.; Brosseau, L.M.; Samant, Y.; Xi, M.; Pan, W.; Haugan, D. The Study Advisory Board A Randomized, Controlled Intervention of Machine Guarding and Related Safety Programs in Small Metal-Fabrication Businesses. Public Health Rep. 2009, 124, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Riphagen-Dalhuisen, J.; Burgerhof, J.G.; Frijstein, G.; Van Der Geest-Blankert, A.D.; Danhof-Pont, M.B.; De Jager, H.J.; A Bos, A.; Smeets, E.E.; De Vries, M.J.; Gallee, P.M.; et al. Hospital-based cluster randomised controlled trial to assess effects of a multi-faceted programme on influenza vaccine coverage among hospital healthcare workers and nosocomial influenza in the Netherlands, 2009 to 2011. Eurosurveillance 2013, 18, 20512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kwak, L.; Kremers, S.P.J.; Visscher, T.L.S.; Van Baak, M.A.; Brug, J. Behavioral and Cognitive Effects of a Worksite-Based Weight Gain Prevention Program: The NHF-NRG In Balance-Project. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2009, 51, 1437–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwak, L.; Kremers, S.P.; Candel, M.J.J.M.; Visscher, T.L.; Brug, J.; Van Baak, M.A. Changes in skinfold thickness and waist circumference after 12 and 24 months resulting from the NHF-NRG In Balance-project. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010, 7, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Looijmans-Van Den Akker, I.; Van Delden, J.; Verheij, T.J.; van der Sande, M.; Van Essen, G.; Riphagen-Dalhuisen, J.; Hulscher, M.E. Effects of a multi-faceted program to increase influenza vaccine uptake among health care workers in nursing homes: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Vaccine 2010, 28, 5086–5092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Goldenhar, L.M.; Lamontagne, A.D.; Katz, T.; Heaney, C.; Landsbergis, P. The Intervention Research Process in Occupational Safety and Health: An Overview From the National Occupational Research Agenda Intervention Effectiveness Research Team. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2001, 43, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nielsen, K.; Randall, R.; Holten, A.-L.; González, E.R. Conducting organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works? Work. Stress 2010, 24, 234–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baranowski, T.; Cerin, E.; Cullen, K.W. Steps in the design, development and formative evaluation of obesity prevention-related behavior change trials. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2009, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- MacKinnon, D.P.; Lockwood, C.M.; Hoffman, J.M.; West, S.G.; Sheets, V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol. Methods 2002, 7, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durlak, J.A.; Dupre, E.P. Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation. Am. J. Community Psychol. 2008, 41, 327–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Havermans, B.M.; Schelvis, R.M.; Boot, C.R.; Brouwers, E.P.; Anema, J.R.; van der Beek Allard, J. Process variables in organizational stress management intervention evaluation research: A systematic review. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2016, 42, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Step 1: Logic model of the problem |
Establish and work with a planning group Conduct a needs assessment to create a logic model of the problem Describe the context for the intervention, including the population, setting, and community State program goals |
Step 2: Program outcomes and objectives; logic model of change |
State expected outcomes for behavior and environment Specify performance objectives for behavioral and environmental outcomes Select determinants for behavioral and environmental outcomes: Construct matrices of change objectives Create a logic model of change |
Step 3: Program design |
Generate program themes, components, scope, and sequence Choose theory and evidence-based change methods Select or design practical applications to deliver change methods |
Step 4: Program Production |
Refine program structure and organization Prepare plans for program materials Draft messages, materials, and protocols Pretest, refine, and produce materials |
Step 5: Program implementation plan |
Identify potential program users (implementers, adopters, and maintainers) State outcomes and performance objectives for program use Construct matrices of change objectives for program use Design implementation interventions |
Step 6: Evaluation plan |
Write effect and process evaluation questions Develop indicators and measures for assessment Specify the evaluation design Complete the evaluation plan |
Oude Hengel, 2011a; 2012; 2013; 2011b [22,28,29,30] | Coffeng, 2012; 2014a; 2014b; 2013 [21,31,32,33] | Van Berkel, 2011; 2014a; 2014b; 2013 [20,34,35,36] | Oude Hengel, 2014; Van Deurssen, 2014b; 2014a [27,37,38] | Mc Eachan, 2008; 2011, Lawton, 2014 [19,39,40] | Verweij, 2009 2012; 2013; 2011; 2012 [23,41,42,43,44] | Viester, 2012; 2015; 2014 [18,45,46] | Strijk, 2009; 2012, 2013; 2011 [17,47,48,49] | Brosseau, 2007; Parker, 2009 [26,50] | Riphagen 2013a; 2013b [25,51] | Kwak, 2007; 2009; 2010 [16,52,53] | Looijmans, 2011; 2010 [24,54] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IM fidelity * | ||||||||||||
Step 1: Logic model of the problem | ||||||||||||
1a. Formation of linkage group (participation) | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | − |
1a. Conduct a needs assessment to create a logic model of the problem (theory-based approach) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | +/− | + | + | + | + |
Step 2: Program outcomes and objectives; Logic model of change | ||||||||||||
2a. Construct matrices of change objectives (theory based) | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | − |
7b. Participative approach (step 1 and/or step 2) (participation) | + | + | + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− | + | +/− | +/− | + |
2c. Differentiation between behavioral and environmental factors (ecological approach) | + | + | + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− | + | + | + | + |
Step 3: Program design | ||||||||||||
3a. Choose theory and evidence-based change methods (theory-based approach) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Step 4: Program production | ||||||||||||
4a. Participative approach (step 3 and/or step 4) (participation) | − | + | + | +/− | + | + | + | − | + | +/− | +/− | + |
4b. Worker and workplace component of intervention (ecological approach) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Step 5: Program implementation plan | ||||||||||||
5a. Identify potential program users (implementers, adopters, and maintainers) (implementation planning) | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/− | + | +/− |
5b. State outcomes and performance objectives for program use (implementation planning) | − | − | − | − | +/− | − | + | − | − | − | − | − |
5c. Identify drivers and barriers for implementation (implementation planning) | + | +/− | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | − | +/− |
Design implementation interventions (implementation planning) | + | + | + | + | + | +/− | + | + | + | + | + | + |
5d. Participative approach (step 5) (participation) | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | + |
Implementation process ** | ||||||||||||
Reach | ++ | − | − | − | ++ | n.m. | − | − | n.m. | n.m. | ++ | n.m. |
Dose delivered | ++ | ++ | n.m. | +/− | +/− | ++ | ++ | ++ | n.m. | n.m | n.m | ++ |
Dose received | ++ | +/− | +/− | − | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/− | n.m. | − | +/− | − |
Fidelity | +/− | +/− | +/− | + | n.m. | +/− | +/− | +/− | n.m. | n.m. | +/− | n.m. |
Satisfaction | + | + | + | + | n.m. | + | + | + | ++ | +/− | + | n.m. |
Intervention effects *** | ||||||||||||
Effects | − | +/− | − | + | + | +/− | − | +/− | + (n.c.) | ++ | ++ | + |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bakhuys Roozeboom, M.C.; Wiezer, N.M.; Boot, C.R.L.; Bongers, P.M.; Schelvis, R.M.C. Use of Intervention Mapping for Occupational Risk Prevention and Health Promotion: A Systematic Review of Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1775. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041775
Bakhuys Roozeboom MC, Wiezer NM, Boot CRL, Bongers PM, Schelvis RMC. Use of Intervention Mapping for Occupational Risk Prevention and Health Promotion: A Systematic Review of Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(4):1775. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041775
Chicago/Turabian StyleBakhuys Roozeboom, Maartje C., Noortje M. Wiezer, Cécile R. L. Boot, Paulien M. Bongers, and Roosmarijn M. C. Schelvis. 2021. "Use of Intervention Mapping for Occupational Risk Prevention and Health Promotion: A Systematic Review of Literature" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 4: 1775. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041775