Corporate Social Responsibility at the Micro-Level as a “New Organizational Value” for Sustainability: Are Females More Aligned towards It?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature and Hypotheses
2.1. MCSR and Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behavior
2.2. Gender as a Moderator
3. Methods
Measures
4. Results
Hypotheses Testing
5. Discussion and Implications
Limitations and Future Research Directions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- GermanWatch. Global Climate Risk Index. 2020. Available online: https://www.germanwatch.org/ (accessed on 2 October 2020).
- Carroll, A.B.; Laasch, O. From managerial responsibility to CSR and back to responsible management. In Research Handbook of Responsible Management; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Carroll, A.B. A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 19–46. [Google Scholar]
- Bowen, H.R.; Johnson, F.E. Social Responsibility of the Businessman; Harper: New York, NY, USA, 1953. [Google Scholar]
- WBCSD. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Available online: www.wbcsd.org (accessed on 11 November 2020).
- Carroll, A.B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1979, 4, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Woźniak, J.; Jurczyk, W. Social and environmental activities in the Polish mining region in the context of CSR. Resour. Policy 2020, 65, 101554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halkos, G.; Nomikos, S.; Tsilika, K. Evidence for Novel Structures Relating CSR Reporting and Economic Welfare: Environmental Sustainability—A Continent-Level Analysis. Comput. Econ. 2021, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamali, D.; Karam, C.; Yin, J.; Soundararajan, V. CSR logics in developing countries: Translation, adaptation and stalled development. J. World Bus. 2017, 52, 343–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anggoro, Y.; Pritasari, A.; Mezaya, R.; Pringgabayu, D.; Ramdlany, D.M.A. Practice of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Extractives Sector in Indonesia. In Sovereign Wealth Funds, Local Content Policies and CSR; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2021; pp. 483–497. [Google Scholar]
- Inekwe, M.; Hashim, F.; Yahya, S.B. CSR in developing countries–the importance of good governance and economic growth: Evidence from Africa. Soc. Responsib. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jariko, M.A.; Børsen, T.; Jhatial, A.A. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities and the Developing Nations. Eur. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
- Awan, U.; Khattak, A.; Kraslawski, A. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) priorities in the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of the industrial sector of Sialkot, Pakistan. In Corporate Social Responsibility in the Manufacturing and Services Sectors; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019; pp. 267–278. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, D.A.; Willness, C.R.; Glavas, A. When corporate social responsibility (CSR) meets organizational psychology: New frontiers in micro-CSR research, and fulfilling a quid pro quo through multilevel insights. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mansoor, A.; Jahan, S.; Riaz, M. Does green intellectual capital spur corporate environmental performance through green workforce? J. Intellect. Cap. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roscoe, S.; Subramanian, N.; Jabbour, C.J.; Chong, T. Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: Enhancing a firm’s environmental performance for sustainable development. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 28, 737–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitzpatrick, J. The impact of healthcare on the environment: Improving sustainability in the health service. Nurs. Times 2010, 106, 18–20. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, S.K.; Del Giudice, M.; Chierici, R.; Graziano, D. Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 150, 119762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Deng, C. Does women’s political empowerment matter for improving the environment? A heterogeneous dynamic panel analysis. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 27, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laureti, T.; Benedetti, I. Exploring pro-environmental food purchasing behaviour: An empirical analysis of Italian consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 3367–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dovidio, J.F.; Piliavin, J.A.; Schroeder, D.A.; Penner, L.A. The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior, 1st ed.; Psychology Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Rand, D.G.; Brescoll, V.L.; Everett, J.A.; Capraro, V.; Barcelo, H. Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2016, 145, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rupp, D.E.; Mallory, D.B. Corporate social responsibility: Psychological, person-centric, and progressing. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2015, 2, 211–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J.; Zhang, H. Socially responsible human resource management and employee support for external CSR: Roles of organizational CSR climate and perceived CSR directed toward employees. J. Bus. Ethics 2019, 156, 875–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, D.A.; Newman, A.; Shao, R.; Cooke, F.L. Advances in employee-focused micro-level research on corporate social responsibility: Situating new contributions within the current state of the literature. J. Bus. Ethics 2019, 157, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afsar, B.; Umrani, W.A. Corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, A.; Farrukh, M.; Iqbal, M.K.; Farhan, M.; Wu, Y. Corporate social responsibility and employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior: The role of organizational pride and employee engagement. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stern, P.C. New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 2000, 56, 407–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Bank. Population, female (% of Total Population)—Pakistan. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL.FE.ZS?locations=PK (accessed on 1 January 2021).
- Agha, N.; Syed, G.K.; Mirani, D.A. Exploring the representation of gender and identity: Patriarchal and citizenship perspectives from the primary level Sindhi textbooks in Pakistan. Women’s Stud. Int. Forum 2018, 66, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javeed, S.A.; Lefen, L. An analysis of corporate social responsibility and firm performance with moderating effects of CEO power and ownership structure: A case study of the manufacturing sector of Pakistan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ahmad, N.; Sial, M.S.; Badulescu, A.; Zia-Ud-Din, M.; Badulescu, D. What Prompts Small and Medium Enterprises to Implement CSR? A Qualitative Insight from an Emerging Economy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, N.; Scholz, M.; Ullah, Z.; Arshad, M.Z.; Sabir, R.I.; Khan, W.A. The nexus of CSR and co-creation: A roadmap towards consumer loyalty. Sustainability 2021, 13, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Rabbani, M.R.; Ahmad, N.; Sial, M.S.; Cheng, G.; Zia-Ud-Din, M.; Fu, Q. CSR, Co-Creation and Green Consumer Loyalty: Are Green Banking Initiatives Important? A Moderated Mediation Approach from an Emerging Economy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latif, K.F.; Pérez, A.; Sahibzada, U.F. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and customer loyalty in the hotel industry: A cross-country study. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 89, 102565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, I.; Nazir, M.S.; Ali, I.; Nurunnabi, M.; Khalid, A.; Shaukat, M.Z. Investing In CSR Pays You Back in Many Ways! The Case of Perceptual, Attitudinal and Behavioral Outcomes of Customers. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kowalczyk, R.; Kucharska, W. Corporate social responsibility practices incomes and outcomes: Stakeholders’ pressure, culture, employee commitment, corporate reputation, and brand performance. A Polish–German cross-country study. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 595–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoque, N.; Rahman, A.R.A.; Molla, R.I.; Noman, A.H.M.; Bhuiyan, M.Z.H. Is corporate social responsibility pursuing pristine business goals for sustainable development? Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 1130–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazari, J.A.; Hrazdil, K.; Mahmoudian, F. Assessing social and environmental performance through narrative complexity in CSR reports. J. Contemp. Account. Econ. 2017, 13, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gligor-Cimpoieru, D.C.; Munteanu, V.P.; Nițu-Antonie, R.D.; Schneider, A.; Preda, G. Perceptions of future employees toward CSR environmental practices in tourism. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fornes, G.; Lopez, B.; de Haan, M.B.; Blanch, J. Best practice example of CSR and S&E engagement in emerging economies: Analysis of a case study based in China. J. Asia Bus. Stud. 2019, 13, 133–154. [Google Scholar]
- Franco, S.; Caroli, M.G.; Cappa, F.; Del Chiappa, G. Are you good enough? CSR, quality management and corporate financial performance in the hospitality industry. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 88, 102395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamura, E. The bidirectional CSR investment–economic performance relationship. J. Glob. Responsib. 2015, 6, 128–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belu, C.; Manescu, C. Strategic corporate social responsibility and economic performance. Appl. Econ. 2013, 45, 2751–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraus, S.; Rehman, S.U.; García, F.J.S. Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 160, 120262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halme, M.; Rintamäki, J.; Knudsen, J.S.; Lankoski, L.; Kuisma, M. When is there a sustainability case for CSR? Pathways to environmental and social performance improvements. Bus. Soc. 2020, 59, 1181–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ruggiero, P.; Cupertino, S. CSR strategic approach, financial resources and corporate social performance: The mediating effect of innovation. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schoen, J.; Chopra, V. The Harm We Do: The Environmental Impact of Medicine. J. Hosp. Med. 2018, 13, 353–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jonathan, E.S. The Hidden Harm of Health Care: Air, Water, and Other Pollution. Available online: https://www.statnews.com/2018/09/25/pollution-health-care-harm/ (accessed on 5 January 2021).
- Cancarevic, I.; Plichtová, L.; Malik, B.H. Healthcare Systems Around the World. In International Medical Graduates in the United States; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2021; pp. 45–79. [Google Scholar]
- Guzzo, R.F.; Abbott, J.; Madera, J.M. A micro-level view of CSR: A hospitality management systematic literature review. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2020, 61, 332–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afshar Jahanshahi, A.; Maghsoudi, T.; Shafighi, N. Employees’ environmentally responsible behavior: The critical role of environmental justice perception. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2021, 17, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Eagly, A.H.; Wood, W.; Diekman, A.B. Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. Dev. Soc. Psychol. Gend. 2000, 12, 174. [Google Scholar]
- Shimanoff, S.B. Gender role theory. Encycl. Commun. Theory 2009, 1, 433–436. [Google Scholar]
- Trelohan, M. Do Women Engage in Pro-environmental Behaviours in the Public Sphere Due to Social Expectations? The Effects of Social Norm-Based Persuasive Messages. VOLUNTAS Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.X.; Tang, X.; Cheung, M.L.; Zhang, Y. An institutional perspective on consumers’ environmental awareness and pro-environmental behavioral intention: Evidence from 39 countries. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mertens, A.; von Krause, M.; Denk, A.; Heitz, T. Gender differences in eating behavior and environmental attitudes–The mediating role of the Dark Triad. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2021, 168, 110359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Geng, L.; Ye, L.; Zhou, K. “Mother Nature” enhances connectedness to nature and pro-environmental behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 2019, 61, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pakistan Economic Survey. Population, Labor Force and Employment. Available online: http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_1819.html (accessed on 6 January 2021).
- Galbreath, J. Drivers of green innovations: The impact of export intensity, women leaders, and absorptive capacity. J. Bus. Ethics 2019, 158, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IQAir. Air Quality in Pakistan. Available online: https://www.iqair.com/us/pakistan (accessed on 3 January 2021).
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics; Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Turker, D. Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. J. Bus. Ethics 2009, 85, 411–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bissing-Olson, M.J.; Iyer, A.; Fielding, K.S.; Zacher, H. Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude. J. Organ. Behav. 2013, 34, 156–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2009; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, T.J.; Dacin, P.A. The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. J. Mark. 1997, 61, 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ahmad, N.; Mahmood, A.; Han, H.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Vega-Muñoz, A.; Din, M.U.; Iqbal Khan, G.; Ullah, Z. Sustainability as a “New Normal” for Modern Businesses: Are SMEs of Pakistan Ready to Adopt It? Sustainability 2021, 13, 1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Economic Forum. The Davos Agenda. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/events/the-davos-agenda-2021 (accessed on 12 February 2021).
- World Bank. Labor Force, Total—Pakistan. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.TOTL.IN?locations=PK (accessed on 7 January 2021).
Demographic | Frequency | % |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 242 | 45.4 |
Female | 291 | 54.6 |
Age (Year) | ||
20–25 | 79 | 14.8 |
26–30 | 193 | 36.2 |
31–40 | 154 | 28.9 |
Above 40 | 107 | 20.1 |
Experience (Years) | ||
1–3 | 92 | 17.3 |
4–6 | 211 | 39.6 |
7–10 | 164 | 30.7 |
Higher | 66 | 12.4 |
Healthcare professionals | ||
Nurses | 203 | 38.1 |
Doctors | 176 | 33.0 |
Others | 154 | 28.9 |
Construct | Items | Factor Loading |
---|---|---|
MCSR | This hospital participates in activities that aim to protect and improve the quality of the natural environment | 0.72 |
The managerial decisions of this hospital related to the employees are usually fair | 0.75 | |
This hospital implements special programs to minimize its negative impact on the natural environment | 0.68 | |
The management of this hospital primarily concerns with employees’ needs and wants | 0.73 | |
This hospital encourages its employees to participate in the voluntary activities | 0.83 | |
This hospital contributes to campaigns and projects that promote the well-being of the society | 0.87 | |
Pro-environmental Behavior | I adequately complete assigned duties in environmentally-friendly ways | 0.57 |
I fulfill responsibilities specified in my job description in environmentally friendly ways | 0.52 | |
I perform tasks that are expected of me in environmentally-friendly ways | 0.51 |
Variable | Items | Mean | SD | MCSR | PNB | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSR | 6 | 3.88 | 0.73 | 0.768 | 0.26 ** | |||
PNB | 3 | 4.09 | 0.66 | 0.728 | ||||
Model Fit Indices | Obtained values | Acceptable values | AVE | Alpha | CR | Skewness | Kurtosis | |
χ2/df RMSEA NFI CFI GFI | 4.17 0.069 0.910 0.933 0.931 | 5.00 0.08 0.90 0.90 0.90 | MCSR PNB | 0.59 0.53 | 0.76 0.69 | 0.78 0.69 | −0.49 −0.56 | 0.58 0.53 |
Path | Beta Value | S.E | LLCI | ULCI | Decision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1: Standardized Direct effects | |||||
MCSR → PNB | 0.281 ** | 0.037 | 0.238 | 0.417 | Accepted |
(χ2/df = 3.86, RMSEA = 0.053, NFI = 0.938, CFI = 0.944, GFI = 0.941) ***, (R2 = 0.291) * ** beta value significant, * R2 value significant | |||||
Model 2: Standardized effects (moderated model) | |||||
MCSR → PNB (Females) | 0.317 ** | 0.026 | 0.214 | 0.389 | Accepted |
(χ2/df = 2.35, RMSEA = 0.041, NFI = 0.963, CFI = 0.971, GFI = 0.967) ***, (R2 = 0.36) * | |||||
MCSR → PNB (Males) | 0.253 ** | 0.031 | 0.311 | 0.519 | Accepted |
(χ2/df = 3.11, RMSEA = 0.046, NFI = 0.958, CFI = 0.965, GFI = 0.963) ***, (R2 = 0.31) * |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ahmad, N.; Ullah, Z.; Mahmood, A.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Vega-Muñoz, A.; Han, H.; Scholz, M. Corporate Social Responsibility at the Micro-Level as a “New Organizational Value” for Sustainability: Are Females More Aligned towards It? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042165
Ahmad N, Ullah Z, Mahmood A, Ariza-Montes A, Vega-Muñoz A, Han H, Scholz M. Corporate Social Responsibility at the Micro-Level as a “New Organizational Value” for Sustainability: Are Females More Aligned towards It? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(4):2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042165
Chicago/Turabian StyleAhmad, Naveed, Zia Ullah, Asif Mahmood, Antonio Ariza-Montes, Alejandro Vega-Muñoz, Heesup Han, and Miklas Scholz. 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility at the Micro-Level as a “New Organizational Value” for Sustainability: Are Females More Aligned towards It?" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 4: 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042165
APA StyleAhmad, N., Ullah, Z., Mahmood, A., Ariza-Montes, A., Vega-Muñoz, A., Han, H., & Scholz, M. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility at the Micro-Level as a “New Organizational Value” for Sustainability: Are Females More Aligned towards It? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042165