Understanding Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity after Physical Activity Referral: Evidence from Scheme Participants and Completers in Northumberland UK
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Context
2.2. Study Setting and Dataset
2.3. Physical Activity Classification
2.4. Data Analysis
Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Participant Characteristics
3.2. Attendance and Activity Choices
3.3. Attendance and Activity Choices by Sex
3.4. Attendance and Activity Choices by Age Group
3.5. Attendance and Weekly Moderate/Vigorous Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity
3.6. Predictors of Moderate/Vigorous Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity
4. Discussion
4.1. Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity
4.2. Demographic Differences in Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity
4.3. Strengths and Limitations
4.4. Implications of This Study
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organisation. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases “Attaining the Nine Global Noncommunicable Diseases Targets; a Shared Responsibility”. 2014. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564854 (accessed on 10 June 2020).
- Nocon, M.; Hiemann, T.; Müller-Riemenschneider, F.; Thalau, F.; Roll, S.; Willich, S.N. Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 2008, 15, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tuomilehto, J.; Lindström, J.; Eriksson, J.G.; Valle, T.T.; Hämäläinen, H.; Ilanne-Parikka, P.; Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S.; Laakso, M.; Louheranta, A.; Rastas, M.; et al. Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Changes in Lifestyle among Subjects with Impaired Glucose Tolerance. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1343–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monninkhof, E.M.; Elias, S.G.; Vlems, F.A.; van der Tweel, I.; Schuit, A.J.; Voskuil, D.W.; van Leeuwen, F.E. Physical Activity and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Epidemiology 2007, 18, 137–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wolin, K.Y.; Yan, Y.; Colditz, G.A.; Lee, I.-M. Physical activity and colon cancer prevention: A meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 100, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, I.-M.; Shiroma, E.J.; Lobelo, F.; Puska, P.; Blair, S.N.; Katzmarzyk, P.T. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012, 380, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- British Heart Foundation. Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behaviour Report 2017; British Heart Foundation: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organisation. WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity Behaviour and Sedentary Behaviour; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Sport England. Active Lives Adult Survey November 2018/19 Report. 2020. Available online: https://www.sportsthinktank.com/research,127120.html (accessed on 11 March 2021).
- Wade, M.; Mann, S.; Copeland, R.J.; Steele, J. Effect of exercise referral schemes upon health and well-being: initial observational insights using individual patient data meta-analysis from the National Referral Database. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2020, 74, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rowley, N.; Mann, S.; Steele, J.; Horton, E.; Jimenez, A. The effects of exercise referral schemes in the United Kingdom in those with cardiovascular, mental health, and musculoskeletal disorders: A preliminary systematic review. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pavey, T.G.; Anokye, N.; Taylor, A.H.; Trueman, P.; Moxham, T.; Fox, K.R.; Hillsdon, M.; Green, C.; Campbell, J.L.; Foster, C.; et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: A systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 2011, 15, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Campbell, F.; Holmes, M.; Everson-Hock, E.; Davis, S.; Woods, H.B.; Anokye, N.; Tappenden, P.; Kaltenthaler, E. A systematic review and economic evaluation of exercise referral schemes in primary care: A short report. Health Technol. Assess. 2015, 19, 1–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duda, J.L.; Williams, G.C.; Ntoumanis, N.; Daley, A.; Eves, F.F.; Mutrie, N.; Rouse, P.C.; Lodhia, R.; Blamey, R.V.; Jolly, K. Effects of a standard provision versus an autonomy supportive exercise referral programme on physical activity, quality of life and well-being indicators: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beck, F.E.; Gillison, F.B.; Koseva, M.D.; Standage, M.; Brodrick, J.L.; Graham, C.; Young, H. The systematic identification of content and delivery style of an exercise intervention. Psychol. Health 2016, 31, 605–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eynon, M.J.; O’Donnell, C.; Williams, L. Gaining qualitative insight into the subjective experiences of adherers to an exercise referral scheme: A thematic analysis. J. Health Psychol. 2016, 23, 1476–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kelly, M.C.; Rae, G.C.; Walker, D.; Partington, S.; Dodd-Reynolds, C.J.; Caplan, N. Retrospective cohort study of the South Tyneside Exercise Referral Scheme 2009–14: predictors of dropout and barriers to adherence. J. Public Health 2016, 39, e257–e264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stewart, L.; Dolan, E.; Carver, P.; Swinton, P.A. Per-protocol investigation of a best practice exercise referral scheme. Public Health 2017, 150, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Exercise Referral Schemes to Promote Physical Activity; NICE Public Health Guidance 54; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Oliver, E.J.; Hanson, C.L.; Lindsey, I.A.; Dodd-Reynolds, C.J. Exercise on referral: Evidence and complexity at the nexus of public health and sport policy. Int. J. Sport Policy Politics 2016, 8, 731–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hanson, C.L.; Oliver, E.J.; Dodd-Reynolds, C.J.; Pearsons, A.; Kelly, P. A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS). Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shore, C.B.; Hubbard, G.; Gorely, T.; Polson, R.; Hunter, A.; Galloway, S.D. Insufficient Reporting of Factors Associated with Exercise Referral Scheme Uptake, Attendance, and Adherence: A Systematic Review of Reviews. J. Phys. Act. Health 2019, 16, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isaacs, A.J.; Critchley, J.A.; Tai, S.S.; Buckingham, K.; Westley, D.; Harridge, S.D.R.; Smith, C.; Gottlieb, J.M. Exercise Evaluation Randomised Trial (EXERT): A randomised trial comparing GP referral for leisure centre-based exercise, community-based walking and advice only. Health Technol. Assess. 2007, 11, 1–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Murphy, S.M.; Edwards, R.T.; Williams, N.; Raisanen, L.; Moore, G.; Linck, P.; Hounsome, N.; Din, N.U.; Moore, L. An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: A randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2012, 66, 745–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dugdill, L.; Graham, R.C.; McNair, F. Exercise referral: The public health panacea for physical activity promotion? A critical perspective of exercise referral schemes; their development and evaluation. Ergonomics 2005, 48, 1390–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanson, C.L.; Allin, L.J.; Ellis, J.G.; Dodd-Reynolds, C.J. An evaluation of the efficacy of the exercise on referral scheme in Northumberland, UK: Association with physical activity and predictors of engagement. A naturalistic observation study. BMJ Open 2013, 3, e002849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sørensen, J.B.; Kragstrup, J.; Skovgaard, T.; Puggaard, L. Exercise on prescription: A randomized study on the effect of counseling vs. counseling and supervised exercise. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2008, 18, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martín-Borràs, C.; Giné-Garriga, M.; Puig-Ribera, A.; Martínez, C.; Solà, M.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. A new model of exercise referral scheme in primary care: Is the effect on adherence to physical activity sustainable in the long term? A 15-month randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e017211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prior, F.; Coffey, M.; Robins, A.; Cook, P. Long-Term Health Outcomes Associated with an Exercise Referral Scheme: An Observational Longitudinal Follow-Up Study. J. Phys. Act. Health 2019, 16, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dodd-Reynolds, C.J.; Vallis, D.; Kasim, A.; Akhter, N.; Hanson, C.L. The Northumberland Exercise Referral Scheme as a Universal Community Weight Management Programme: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Outcomes, Expectations and Experiences across a Social Gradient. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Housing Communities & Local Government. English Indices of Deprivation 2019. Available online: http://imd-by-postcode.opendatacommunities.org/imd/2019 (accessed on 21 February 2020).
- McLennan, D.; Noble, S.; Noble, M.; Plunkett, E.; Wright, G.; Gutacker, N. The English Indices of Deprivation 2019 Technical Report; Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–117.
- Hanson, C.L.; Kelly, P.; Neubeck, L.; Bell, J.; Gibb, H.; Jin, K. The contribution of leisure center usage to physical activity in the UK: Evidence from a large population-based cohort. J. Phys. Act. Health 2021, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ainsworth, B.E.; Haskell, W.L.; Whitt, M.C.; Irwin, M.L.; Swartz, A.M.; Strath, S.J.; O’Brien, W.L.; Bassett, D.R.; Schmitz, K.H.; Emplaincourt, P.O.; et al. Compendium of Physical Activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000, 32, S498–S516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- World Health Organisation. WHO STEPS Surveillance Manual: The WHO STEPwise Approach to Chronic Disease Risk Factor Surveillance; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Dinneen, L.C.; Blakesley, B.C. Algorithm AS 62: A Generator for the Sampling Distribution of the Mann- Whitney U Statistic. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C (Appl. Stat.) 1973, 22, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godin, G. The Godin-Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire. Health Fit. J. Can. 2011, 4, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
- Amireault, S.; Godin, G. The Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire: Validity Evidence Supporting its Use for Classifying Healthy Adults into Active and Insufficiently Active Categories. Percept. Mot. Ski. 2015, 120, 604–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taylor, A.; Taylor, R.S.; Ingram, W.; Dean, S.G.; Jolly, K.; Mutrie, N.; Lambert, J.; Yardley, L.; Streeter, A.; Greaves, C.; et al. Randomised controlled trial of an augmented exercise referral scheme using web-based behavioural support for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: The e-coachER trial. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowley, N.; Steele, J.; Wade, M.; Copeland, R.J.; Mann, S.; Liguori, G.; Horton, E.; Jimenez, A. Are Exercise Referral Schemes Associated With an Increase in Physical Activity? Observational Findings Using Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis from the National Referral Database. J. Phys. Act. Health 2020, 17, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, K.; Rahman, M.; Moore, G. Patterning in Patient Referral to and Uptake of a National Exercise Referral Scheme (NERS) in Wales from 2008 to 2017: A Data Linkage Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gidlow, C.; Johnston, L.H.; Crone, D.; Morris, C.; Smith, A.; Foster, C.; James, D.V.B. Socio-demographic patterning of referral, uptake and attendance in Physical Activity Referral Schemes. J. Public Health 2007, 29, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sowden, S.L.; Breeze, E.; Barber, J.; Raine, R. Do general practices provide equitable access to physical activity interventions? Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2008, 58, e1–e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Morgan, F.; Battersby, A.; Weightman, A.L.; Searchfield, L.; Turley, R.; Morgan, H.; Jagroo, J.; Ellis, S. Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants—What do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harrison, R.A.; Roberts, C.; Elton, P.J. Does primary care referral to an exercise programme increase physical activity one year later? A randomized controlled trial. J. Public Health 2004, 27, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, D.; Mills, H.; Crone, D.; Johnston, L.H.; Morris, C.; Gidlow, C.J. Factors associated with physical activity referral completion and health outcomes. J. Sports Sci. 2009, 27, 1007–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UK Active Research Institute. Moving Communities: Active Leisure Trends 2019 Report; UK Active Research Institute: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Van Uffelen, J.G.Z.; Khan, A.; Burton, N.W. Gender differences in physical activity motivators and context preferences: A population-based study in people in their sixties. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, G.F.; Raisanen, L.; Moore, L.; Din, N.U.; Murphy, S. Mixed-method process evaluation of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme. Health Educ. 2013, 113, 476–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamieson, M.; Population & Household Projections for Northumberland. Comparing Projections by ONS and Northumberland County Council (Using Popgroup Model). Northumberland, UK. 2013. Available online: https://www.northumberland.gov.uk/NorthumberlandCountyCouncil/media/Northumberland-Knowledge/NK%20people/Demographics/Population%20projections/Population-projections-for-Northumberland-comparison.pdf (accessed on 11 March 2021).
Participant Characteristic | All Users (n = 1194) | PARS * Participants (n = 448) | PARS * Completers (n = 746) | χ2 | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n/% | n/% | n/% | |||
Sex | |||||
Male | 562 (47.1) | 190 (42.4) | 373 (50) | 6.683 | 0.01 |
Female | 631 (52.9) | 258 (57.6) | 373 (50) | ||
Age group | |||||
<50 years | 120 (10.0) | 69 (15.4) | 74 (6.9) | 63.995 | <0.001 |
50–59 years | 139 (11.6) | 83 (18.5) | 56 (7.5) | ||
60–69 years | 392 (32.8) | 130 (29.0) | 262 (35.1) | ||
70+ years | 543 (45.5) | 166 (37.1) | 377 (50.5) | ||
IMD ** | |||||
IMD1 | 230 (19.3) | 58 (12.9) | 172 (23.1) | 20.467 | <0.001 |
IMD2 | 195 (16.3) | 75 (16.7) | 120 (16.1) | ||
IMD3 | 235 (19.7) | 102 (22.8) | 133 (17.8) | ||
IMD4 | 209 (17.5) | 77 (17.2) | 132 (17.7) | ||
IMD5 | 309 (25.9) | 128 (28.6) | 181 (24.3) | ||
Not Stated | 16 (1.3) | 8 (1.8) | 8 (1.0) |
Activity Type | All Participants (n = 1194) | PARS Participants (n = 448) | PARS Completers (n = 746) |
---|---|---|---|
Attendances (Times, %) | Attendances (Times, %) | Attendances (Times, %) | |
Gym | 10,117 (21.6) | 1579 (21.4) | 8538 (21.6) |
Fitness Classes | 6027 (13.2) | 954 (12.9) | 5253 (13.3) |
Swimming | 1937 (4.1) | 682 (9.2) | 1255 (3.2) |
Other | 655 (1.4) | 101 (1.4) | 554 (1.4) |
PARS/PARS exit route session | 28,024 (59.7) | 4065 (55.1) | 23,959 (60.5) |
Total | 46,940 | 7381 | 39,559 |
Activity Type | Female | Male |
---|---|---|
Attendances (% of Usage) | Attendances (% of Usage) | |
All participants (n = 1193) | (n = 631) | (n = 562) |
Gym | 4248 (17.4) | 5869 (26.1) |
Fitness Classes | 5189 (21.2) | 1018 (4.5) |
Swimming | 1238 (5.1) | 699 (3.1) |
Other | 346 (1.4) | 309 (1.4) |
PARS/PARS exit route session | 13,444 (54.9) | 14,579 (64.9) |
Total | 24,465 | 22,474 |
PARS participants (n = 447) | (n = 258) | (n = 189) |
Gym | 733 (16.1) | 846 (30.0) |
Fitness Classes | 881 (19.3) | 73 (2.6) |
Swimming | 612 (13.4) | 70 (2.5) |
Other | 26 (0.6) | 75 (2.6) |
PARS/PARS exit route session | 2305 (50.6) | 1759 (62.3) |
Total | 4557 | 2823 |
PARS completers (n = 746) | (n = 373) | (n = 373 |
Gym | 3515 (17.7) | 5023 (25.6) |
Fitness Classes | 4308 (21.6) | 945 (4.8) |
Swimming | 626 (3.1) | 629 (3.2) |
Other | 320 (1.6) | 234 (1.2) |
PARS/PARS exit route session | 11,139 (56.0) | 12,820 (65.2) |
Total | 19,908 | 19,651 |
Activity Type | <50 Years | 50–59 Years | 60–69 Years | 70+ Years |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attendances (Times, %) | Attendances (Times, %) | Attendances (Times, %) | Attendances (Times, %) | |
All users (n = 1194) | ||||
Gym | 1219 (30.6) | 1064 (22.8) | 3579 (21.6) | 4255 (19.6) |
Fitness Classes | 929 (23.3) | 527 (11.2) | 2399 (14.5) | 2352 (10.8) |
Swimming | 124 (3.1) | 358 (7.7) | 901 (5.4) | 554 (2.5) |
Other | 3 (0.1) | 152 (3.3) | 286 (1.7) | 214 (0.9) |
PARS/PARS exit route session | 1707 (42.9) | 2563 (55.0) | 9399 (56.7) | 14,355 (66.1) |
Total attendances | 3982 | 4664 | 16,564 | 21,730 |
PARS participants (448) | ||||
Gym | 319 (32.8) | 292 (20.8) | 494 (20.1) | 474 (18.6) |
Fitness Classes | 182 (18.7) | 90 (6.4) | 449 (18.3) | 233 (9.1) |
Swimming | 29 (3.0) | 290 (20.7) | 154 (6.3) | 209 (8.2) |
Other | 0 (0.0) | 74 (5.3) | 11 (0.4) | 16 (0.6) |
PARS session | 442 (45.5) | 655 (46.8) | 1349 (54.9) | 1619 (63.5) |
Total attendances | 972 | 1401 | 2457 | 2551 |
PARS completers (746) | ||||
Gym | 900 (29.9) | 772 (23.7) | 3085 (21.9) | 3781 (19.7) |
Fitness Classes | 747 (24.8) | 437 (13.4) | 1950 (13.8) | 2119 (11.0) |
Swimming | 95 (3.2) | 68 (2.1) | 747 (5.3) | 345 (1.8) |
Other | 3 (0.01) | 78 (2.4) | 275 (1.9) | 198 (1.0) |
PARS exit route session | 1265 (42.0) | 1908 (58.5) | 8050 (57.1) | 12,736 (66.4) |
Total attendances | 3010 | 3263 | 14,107 | 19,179 |
Level of Activity | All Participants (n = 1194) | PARS Participants (n = 448) | PARS Completers (n = 746) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | ||
Number of Attendances | 26.0 (8.0–58.0) | 9.0 (4.0–20.0) | 42.0 (21.8–72.3) | |
Actual Weeks Usage | 36.0 (14.0–51.0) | 13.0 (5.0–25.8) | 49.0 (32.8–51.0) | |
Attendances per week | 1.1 (0.6–1.6) | 1.0 (0.5–1.6) | 1.1 (0.7–1.6) | 0.1 |
Weekly moderate/vigorous LCPA (min) | 64.0 (36.0–96.0) | 57.0 (26.0–90.0) | 68.0 (42.0–100.0) | <0.001 |
Activity Category | All Users | PARS Participants | PARS Completers | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | |
<30 min per week | 229 | 19.2 | 128 | 28.6 | 101 | 13.5 |
30–149 min per week | 868 | 72.7 | 293 | 65.4 | 575 | 77.1 |
≥150 min per week | 97 | 8.1 | 27 | 6.0 | 70 | 9.4 |
Characteristic | All Participants | PARS Participants | PARS Completers |
---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
Membership type | |||
PARS participant | 1 | ||
PARS completer | 2.14 (1.61–2.82) ** | ||
Sex | |||
Male | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Female | 0.90 (0.70–1.17) | 0.65 (0.43–0.97) * | 1.16 (0.82–1.63) |
Age group | |||
<50 years | 1 | 1 | 1 |
50–59 years | 1.38 (0.81–2.36) | 1.26 (0.65–2.45) | 1.65 (0.67–4.08) |
60–69 years | 1.52 (0.96–2.40) | 2.08 (1.11–3.91) * | 1.20 (0.59–2.44) |
70+ years | 1.24 (0.80–1.93) | 1.21 (0.67–2.19) | 1.19 (0.62–2.39) |
IMD ^ quintile | |||
Least deprived 20% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
21–40% | 1.21 (0.82–1.81) | 1.37 (0.75–2.52) | 1.11 (0.65–1.90) |
41–60% | 0.87 (0.60–1.27) | 1.01 (0.59–1.74) | 0.72 (4.42–1.23) |
61–80% | 0.89 (0.60–1.33) | 0.88 (0.48–1.59) | 0.88 (0.51–1.53) |
Most deprived 20% | 1.71 (1.15–2.55) * | 2.37 (1.19–4.74) * | 1.47 (0.89–2.44) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bell, J.; Neubeck, L.; Jin, K.; Kelly, P.; Hanson, C.L. Understanding Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity after Physical Activity Referral: Evidence from Scheme Participants and Completers in Northumberland UK. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062957
Bell J, Neubeck L, Jin K, Kelly P, Hanson CL. Understanding Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity after Physical Activity Referral: Evidence from Scheme Participants and Completers in Northumberland UK. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(6):2957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062957
Chicago/Turabian StyleBell, Jordan, Lis Neubeck, Kai Jin, Paul Kelly, and Coral L. Hanson. 2021. "Understanding Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity after Physical Activity Referral: Evidence from Scheme Participants and Completers in Northumberland UK" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 6: 2957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062957
APA StyleBell, J., Neubeck, L., Jin, K., Kelly, P., & Hanson, C. L. (2021). Understanding Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity after Physical Activity Referral: Evidence from Scheme Participants and Completers in Northumberland UK. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 2957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062957