Impact of Multifaceted Workplace Bullying on the Relationships between Technology Usage, Organisational Climate and Employee Physical and Emotional Health
, Shazia Qayyum 3, Iram Fatima 3, Sriyanto Sriyanto 4, Yasinta Indrianti 5, Aqeel Khan 6 and Leo-Paul Dana 7Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
English language and writing style still poor. Although there is evidnce of editing, there are still sentences that are very poorly phrased, spelling and grammatical errors and some sentences do not make sense.
Assurance regarding ethical considerations has been provided
Author Response
Thank you for your suggestions. The manuscript has been revised accordingly.
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear authors,
Thank you very much for your great effort in improving your manuscript. Well done!
Best wishes,
Author Response
Thank you for your suggestions. The manuscript has been revised accordingly.
This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Dear authors,
Thank you very much for the outstanding improvement of your manuscript. The final comment is about the referencing style throughout the text which needs revision (double-check). Examples: Line 116, 124, etc.
Author Response
Reviewer 1
Thank you very much for the outstanding improvement of your manuscript. The final comment is about the referencing style throughout the text which needs revision (double-check). Examples: Line 116, 124, etc.
Author’s Response
The article has been corrected and highlighted.
Reviewer 2
I have reviewed the changes made by authors and am not satisfied that issues raised on first reading have been addressed adequately.
There is still no evidence that the study has obtained ethical clearance, indeed this has been misunderstood by the authors.
The quality of writing is too poor for publication in an English language Journal
Author’s Response
The article has been corrected and highlighted.
Reviewer 3
I am happy with the paper as presented now - though I don't regard it is significant contribution
Author’s Response
The article has been corrected and highlighted.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
I have reviewed the changes made by authors and am not satisfied that issues raised on first reading have been addressed adequately.
There is still no evidence that the study has obtained ethical clearance, indeed this has been misunderstood by the authors.
The quality of writing is too poor for publication in an english language Journal
Author Response
Reviewer 1
Thank you very much for the outstanding improvement of your manuscript. The final comment is about the referencing style throughout the text which needs revision (double-check). Examples: Line 116, 124, etc.
Author’s Response
The article has been corrected and highlighted.
Reviewer 2
I have reviewed the changes made by authors and am not satisfied that issues raised on first reading have been addressed adequately.
There is still no evidence that the study has obtained ethical clearance, indeed this has been misunderstood by the authors.
The quality of writing is too poor for publication in an English language Journal
Author’s Response
The article has been corrected and highlighted.
Reviewer 3
I am happy with the paper as presented now - though I don't regard it is significant contribution
Author’s Response
The article has been corrected and highlighted.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
I am happy with the paper as presented now - though I don't regard it is significant contribution
Author Response
Reviewer 1
Thank you very much for the outstanding improvement of your manuscript. The final comment is about the referencing style throughout the text which needs revision (double-check). Examples: Line 116, 124, etc.
Author’s Response
The article has been corrected and highlighted.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
