Variability in Forest Visit Numbers in Different Regions and Population Segments before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Role of Forest Accessibility
3.2. Roles of Income and Type of Employment
3.3. Role of Age
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tyrväinen, L.; Buchecker, M.; Vuletic, D.; Degenhart, B. Evaluating the economic and social benefits of forest recreation and nature tourism. In European Forest Recreation and Tourism: A Handbook; Bell, S., Simpson, S., Tyrväinen, L., Sievänen, T., Pröbstl, U., Eds.; Taylor and Francis Group: London, UK, 2009; pp. 35–64. [Google Scholar]
- Hartig, T.; Böök, A.; Garvill, J.; Olsson, T.; Gärling, T. Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scand. J. Psychol. 1996, 37, 378–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geisler, F.C.; Vennewald, N.; Kubiak, T.; Weber, H. The impact of heart rate variability on subjective well-being is mediated by emotion regulation. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2010, 49, 723–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karjalainen, E.; Sarjala, T.; Raitio, H. Promoting human health through forests: Overview and major challenges. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2010, 15, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuo, M. How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gallis, C.T. Forests for public health: A global innovative prospect for the humanity. Preface. In Forests for Public Health; Gallis, C.T., Shin, W.S., Eds.; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Sievänen, T.; Arnberger, A.; Dehez, J.; Jensen, F.S. Monitoring of forest recreation demand. In European Forest Recreation and Tourism: A Handbook; Bell, S., Simpson, S., Tyrväinen, L., Sievänen, T., Pröbstl, U., Eds.; Taylor and Francis Group: London, UK, 2009; pp. 105–133. [Google Scholar]
- Mann, C.; Pouta, E.; Gentin, S.; Jensen, F.S. Outdoor recreation in forest policy and legislation: A European comparison. Urban For. Urban Green. 2010, 9, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doimo, I.; Masiero, M.; Gatto, P. Forest and wellbeing: Bridging medical and forest research for effective forest-based initiatives. Forests 2020, 11, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.C.; Kuo, R.L.; Shih, S.R. COVID-19: The First Documented Coronavirus Pandemic in History. Biomed. J. 2020, 43, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, J.; Degeling, C.; McVernon, J.; Dawson, A. How should we conduct pandemic vaccination? Vaccine 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.D.; Lee, S.; Lim, J.K.; Kang, Y.M.; Moon, H.J.; Lee, W.J. Providing essential clinical care for non-COVID-19patients in a Seoul metropolitan acute care hospital amidst ongoing treatment of COVID-19 patients. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 106, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viscusi, W.K. Pricing the global health risks of the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Risk Uncertain. 2020, 61, 101–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, W.P. Forest for public health and welfare: Introduction to forest policy in Korea. In World Conference on Forests for Public Health: Abstract Book; Hellenic Agricaltural Organization DEMETER: Athens, Greece, 2019; p. 29. [Google Scholar]
- Townsend, L.; Dyer, A.H.; Jones, K.; Dunne, J.; Kiersey, R.; Gaffney, F.; O’Connor, L.; Leavy, D.; O’Brian, K.; Dowds, J.; et al. Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartig, T.; Evans, G.W.; Jamner, L.D.; Deborah, S.D.; Garling, T. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003, 23, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simkin, J.; Ojala, A.; Tyrväinen, L. Restorative effects of mature and young commercial forests, pristine old-growth forest and urban recreation forest—A field experiment. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 48, 126567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esterwood, E.; Saeed, S.A. Past epidemics, natural disasters, COVID19 and mental health: Learning from history as we deal with the present and prepare for the future. Psychiatr. Q. 2020, 91, 1121–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiang, Y.-T.; Yang, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Cheung, T.; Ng, C.H. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry 2020, 7, 228–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Consumers and Biobased Materials. An International Survey 2018. Available online: https://lf.tuzvo.sk/sk/consumers-and-biobased-materials-international-survey (accessed on 27 January 2021).
- Krejcie, R.V.; Morgan, D.W. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1970, 30, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- STATdat. Available online: http://statdat.statistics.sk/cognosext/cgi-bin/cognos.cgi?b_action=xts.run&m=portal/cc.xts&gohome= (accessed on 27 January 2021).
- Abildtrup, J.; Garcia, S.; Olsen, S.B.; Stenger, A. Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 92, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hörnsten, L.; Fredman, P. On the distance to recreational forests in Sweden. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2000, 51, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taye, F.A.; Abildtrup, J.; Mayer, M.; Ščasný, M.; Strange, N.; Lundhede, T. Childhood experience in forest recreation practices: Evidence from nine European countries. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 46, 126471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, F.S.; Koch, N.E. Twenty-five years of forest recreation research in Denmark and its influence on forest policy. Scand. J. For. Res. 2004, 19, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mizaras, S.; Kavaliauskas, M.; Cinga, G.; Mizaraite, D.; Belova, O. Socio-economic Aspects of Recreational Use of Forests in Lithuania. Balt For. 2015, 21, 308–314. [Google Scholar]
- Kline, J.D.; Rosenberger, R.S.; White, E.M. A national assessmentof physical activity in US national forests. J. For. 2011, 109, 343–351. [Google Scholar]
- Derks, J.; Giessen, L.; Winkel, G. COVID-19-induced visitor boom reveals the importance of forests as critical infrastructure. For. Policy Econ. 2020, 118, 102253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoch, I. Income and City Size. Urban Stud. 1972, 9, 299–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Yang, D.; Huo, J. Studies of the Relationship between City Size and Urban Benefits in China Based on a Panel Data Model. Sustainability 2016, 8, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- US Forest Service. National Visitor Use Monitoring Survey Results National Summary Report 2018. Available online: https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/5082018_national_summary_report_070219.pdf (accessed on 26 October 2020).
- Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic. Available online: https://slovak.statistics.sk (accessed on 26 January 2021).
- Raišienė, A.G.; Rapuano, V.; Varkulevičiūtė, K.; Stachová, K. Working from Home—Who Is Happy? A Survey of Lithuania’s Employees during the COVID-19 Quarantine Period. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takayama, N.; Morikawa, T.; Bielinis, E. Relation between psychological restorativeness and lifestyle, quality of life, resilience, and stress-coping in forest settings. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bielinis, E.; Bielinis, L.; Krupińska-Szeluga, S.; Łukowski, A.; Takayama, N. The Effects of a Short Forest Recreation Program on Physiological and Psychological Relaxation in Young Polish Adults. Forests 2019, 10, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Husky, M.M.; Kovess-Masfety, V.; Swendsen, J.D. Stress and anxiety among university students in France during Covid-19 mandatory confinement. Compr. Psychiatry 2020, 102, 152191. [Google Scholar]
- Oláh, L.S.; Kotowska, I.E.; Richter, R.; Olah, L.S.; Richter, R.; Kotowska, I.E. State-of-the art report: The new roles of men and women and implications for families and societies. Fam. Soc. Work. Pap. Ser. 2014, 11, 11–12. [Google Scholar]
- Weill, J.A.; Stigler, M.; Deschenes, O.; Springborn, M.R. Social distancing responses to COVID-19 emergency declarations strongly differentiated by income. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 19658–19660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sacco, K.; Galletto, V.; Blanzieri, E. How has the 9/11 terrorist attack influenced decision making? Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2003, 17, 1113–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.Z.; Li, S.; Wang, W.Z.; Rao, L.L.; Liu, H. Are people always more risk averse after disasters? Surveys after a heavy snow-hit and a major earthquake in China in 2008. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2011, 25, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mata, R.; Josef, A.K.; Samanez-Larkin, G.R.; Hertwig, R. Age differences in risky choice: A meta-analysis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1235, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schama, S. Landscape and Memory; Harper Collins: London, UK, 1995; p. 672. [Google Scholar]
Variable | Stratum | Population Size | Required Sample Size | Realized Sample Size | Margin of Error (CL 90%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | male | 2,194,802 | 271 | 470 | 3.79 |
female | 2,345,447 | 271 | 530 | 3.57 | |
total | 4,540,249 | 271 | 1000 | 2.60 | |
Age | 16–29 | 868,926 | 271 | 107 | 7.95 |
30–44 | 1,302,786 | 271 | 280 | 4.91 | |
45–62 | 1,317,266 | 271 | 276 | 4.95 | |
>62 | 1,051,271 | 271 | 337 | 4.48 | |
Residence area | Bratislava (capital) | 669,592 | 271 | 114 | 7.70 |
Eastern Slovakia | 1,627,704 | 271 | 299 | 4.76 | |
Central Slovakia | 1,336,785 | 271 | 249 | 5.21 | |
Western Slovakia | 1,823,792 | 271 | 338 | 4.47 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pichlerová, M.; Önkal, D.; Bartlett, A.; Výbošťok, J.; Pichler, V. Variability in Forest Visit Numbers in Different Regions and Population Segments before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073469
Pichlerová M, Önkal D, Bartlett A, Výbošťok J, Pichler V. Variability in Forest Visit Numbers in Different Regions and Population Segments before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(7):3469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073469
Chicago/Turabian StylePichlerová, Magdaléna, Dilek Önkal, Anthony Bartlett, Jozef Výbošťok, and Viliam Pichler. 2021. "Variability in Forest Visit Numbers in Different Regions and Population Segments before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 7: 3469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073469