Next Article in Journal
Cumulative Pesticides Exposure of Children and Their Parents Living near Vineyards by Hair Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Increased Compulsivity in Adulthood after Early Adolescence Immune Activation: Preclinical Evidence
Previous Article in Journal
Developing a Culturally Sensitive ICF-Based Tool to Describe Functioning of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: TEA-CIFunciona Version 1.0 Pilot Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sex and Exposure to Postnatal Chlorpyrifos Influence the Epigenetics of Feeding-Related Genes in a Transgenic APOE Mouse Model: Long-Term Implications on Body Weight after a High-Fat Diet
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physical Activity and Resilience among College Students: The Mediating Effects of Basic Psychological Needs

1
School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
2
School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(7), 3722; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073722
Submission received: 25 February 2021 / Revised: 30 March 2021 / Accepted: 1 April 2021 / Published: 2 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Life Style and Mental Health)

Abstract

:
Considering the significance of resilience in coping with adversity, how to improve college students’ resilience is worthy of attention. Previous studies have revealed that physical activity can promote resilience; however, few studies examined the mediating factors between them. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of physical activity on resilience, as well as the mediating effects of competence need, autonomy need, and relatedness need between physical activity and resilience. The study involved 2375 college students (1110 males and 1265 females), with an average age of 20.25 years (SD = 2.04). Participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form, Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale, and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Results showed that physical activity was positively associated with resilience, and the three basic needs played significant mediating roles between physical activity and resilience. The indirect effect of competence need was significantly greater than that of autonomy need and relatedness need. To conclude, physical activity plays an important role in resilience among college students, and the satisfaction of competence, autonomy, and relatedness needs mediates the relationship between physical activity and resilience, among which, competence need appears as the strongest mediator.

1. Introduction

College students are confronted with a wide array of stressors that may lead to mental health issues, including academic challenges, relational adjustment, employment pressure, and some potential traumatic events [1]. Resilience is generally defined as the process of facing, overcoming, and growing from these stressors [2]. It is considered an important protective factor in mitigating the risk of stressful or adverse situations and promoting the healthy development of individuals [3,4,5]. Studies have shown that people with strong resilience are more psychologically healthy and less likely to have negative emotions [6,7,8,9], which indicates the importance of resilience. It enables people to thrive under challenging or threatening circumstances [10]. College students with high resilience tend to more actively mobilize internal and external resources to tackle the adversity, and they are less likely to have mental health problems, poor academic performance, and interpersonal problems compared to those with low resilience [11,12]. Given the great significance of resilience for college students, how to promote their resilience merits greater attention.
Evidence exists that physical activity is positively and significantly associated with resilience [13]. Secer and Yildizhan have suggested that the level of physical activity is an important variable that influences the psychological resilience level of university students [14]. Dunston et al. have indicated that physical activity contributes to the positive outcome of psychological resilience, and with the increase of vigorous physical activity, resilience is significantly enhanced [15]. San Román-Mata et al. have found that the more that college students participate in physical activity, the greater are their levels of resilience [16]. Xia et al. have suggested that physical activity is an effective way to foster college students’ resilience, which can improve their problem-solving ability, interpersonal communication ability, self-confidence, emotional regulation, and positive cognition [13].
Although some studies have revealed that physical activity is positively related to resilience [13,14,15,16], few studies have explored the mediating factors in the relationship between physical activity and resilience. Drawing from basic psychological needs theory may help us to understand the association between them. Basic psychological needs theory posits that competence need, autonomy need, and relatedness need are essential nutrients for human growth, integrity, and health [17,18]. Research has shown that when the basic needs are met, positive functioning and optimal mental well-being will follow [19,20]. Deci and Ryan have suggested that the three psychological needs function separately, and meeting each need is independently important [17]. Each basic need may have its own unique contribution in a specific domain. For example, Deci et al. have pointed out that there is a strong relationship between competence need satisfaction and job engagement [21]. Recent correlational and experimental evidence has revealed that the need for autonomy is the only mediator in the relationship between materialism and well-being [22]. Amato et al. have found that relatedness is the most important mediator as compared to competence and autonomy between total couple leisure satisfaction and marital satisfaction [23]. Therefore, we aimed to examine the effect of each psychological need in the physical activity-resilience link.
First, we propose that the satisfaction of competence need may be the mediating factor in the relationship between physical activity and resilience. Competence need refers to the perception that one is capable of achieving the desired goals [17]. It has been found to be significantly and positively correlated with resilience [24,25]. Neufeld and Malin have suggested that competence need satisfaction is associated with an increase in college students’ resilience and it likely represents a valuable avenue for supporting resilience [26]. In addition, physical activity has been supposed to be correlated with the satisfaction of competence need [27,28]. Babic et al. have reported a direct association between higher levels of physical activity and higher perceived competence [29]. By taking an active part in physical activities, college students’ perception of competence and self-efficacy may be satisfied. High perception of competence promotes positive expectations for achievement behaviors [30], which enables people to confidently and actively cope with the stress they encounter in the environment. In other words, their psychological resilience has been enhanced.
Second, the satisfaction of autonomy need may also play a mediating role between physical activity and resilience. Autonomy need is the belief that one’s actions are entirely self-chosen and controlled by one’s own will [17]. It demonstrates a positive correlation with resilience [31,32]. Martinek and Hellison have argued that the satisfaction of autonomy need is an effective way to acquire some degree of resilience for youth [33]. In addition, physical activity has been reported to have a positive effect on autonomy need satisfaction [27]. Fraguela-Vale et al. have demonstrated that engaging in physical activity, especially unstructured activity, is beneficial to the satisfaction of autonomy need [28]. Similarly, Doré et al. have suggested that physical activity could foster the perception of autonomy [34]. By actively participating in physical activities, college students may have a sense of self-determination and control over the environment, and their autonomy need will be satisfied. When college students feel free to make their own decisions, they may have greater adaptability and resilience to face and overcome the adversity they encounter.
Third, we believe that the satisfaction of relatedness need may be a mediator of the relationship between physical activity and resilience. Relatedness need is the belief that one is connected and valued by others [17]. It has been reported to be closely related to psychological resilience [24,31]. Rutter has suggested that when an individual develops positive and close relationships with others, a strong social support system will be created for dealing with adversity [35]. Perceived social support, respect, and understanding contribute to stronger psychological resilience that enables the individual to cope with stressors effectively [35]. Meanwhile, physical activity has been found to be positively associated with the satisfaction of relatedness need [27]. Stathi, Fox, and McKenna have revealed that physical activity allows people to interact socially with others and helps them build up a social support network [36]. Physical activity has also been reported to provide people with a greater sense of belonging, which satisfies their relatedness need [37]. Students may have close partners in physical activities and meet their need for relatedness. When they build up a good social network, they may have more courage and confidence to face pressure, setbacks, and difficulties.
To sum up, this study aims to explore the relationship between physical activity and resilience, as well as the mediating roles of competence need, autonomy need, and relatedness need between them. We expect that (1) physical activity is significantly and positively correlated with resilience in college students and (2) the relationship between physical activity and resilience is mediated by the satisfaction of competence need, autonomy need and relatedness need. The representation of the structural model is shown as follows (Figure 1).

2. Methods

2.1. Participants and Procedures

Participants in the present study were Chinese college students. We selected six universities (three in Shandong Province, one in Zhejiang Province, one in Sichuan Province, and one in Guizhou Province) as the sampling unit. We recruited participating students by the following ways: (1) advertising the questionnaire through social media; (2) printing out the link of the questionnaire and distributing it to the teaching buildings, departments, and dining rooms of students so that students could scan the link and fill in the questionnaire; and (3) students who had completed the questionnaire were encouraged to invite their classmates or friends to participate. Participants completed the questionnaire via the survey link. Before the survey, the purpose of this research and the voluntary nature of participation were clearly communicated to all the participants. They were informed that they could stop the survey at any time, and that completing the questionnaire indicated their informed consent to participate in this study. All data were collected on a voluntary, anonymous, and confidential basis. The Ethics Committee of the School of Public Health of Shandong University approved this study (No. 20190912).

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Demographic Factors

The demographic factors included gender, age, grade, major, residence, and whether the participant was an only child or not. Grades included freshmen, sophomore, junior, senior, and postgraduate. Majors were categorized as sciences, liberal arts, engineering, and medicine. Residence included urban or rural areas.

2.2.2. The Short Form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF)

The Chinese version of the short from of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) was used to assess the physical activity of college students in this study [38]. The IPAQ-SF measures the number of days and the duration of each day of three types of activity: vigorous-intensity activities, moderate-intensity activities, and walking [39]. Each intensity of physical activity was weighted by its energy requirements in metabolic equivalent task (MET) minutes per week. A MET score was calculated by multiplying the MET value for each activity with duration (minutes) and frequency (days). Obtaining the amount of physical activity per week required the totaling of these three types of activities [39]. The IPAQ-SF has been proved to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing physical activity levels and can be culturally adapted for the Chinese population [38].

2.2.3. Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale (BNSG-S)

The Chinese version [40] of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale (BNSG-S) [41] was used to measure the fulfillment of psychological needs. The BNSG-S consists of 21 items, including 6 items measuring competence need, 7 items measuring autonomy need, and 8 items measuring relatedness need. The items were rated using a 7-point Likert scale from 1 “not at all” to 7 “very much”. In the whole scale, 12 items adopt positive scoring, such as “I feel like I can decide for myself how to live my life”, and the other 9 items adopt the reverse scoring method, such as “I often feel incompetent”. The higher the subscale score is, the greater the satisfaction of the corresponding need is. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient values for the competence subscale, autonomy subscale, and relatedness subscale were respectively 0.758, 0.705, and 0.827 in this study.

2.2.4. Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)

The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) was developed by American scholars Connor and Davidson [42]; it is a widely accepted measure of resilience [43]. In this study, the Chinese version of CD-RISC translated and modified by Yu and Zhang was used [44]. The CD-RISC is a 25-item self-report questionnaire with items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 “never” to 4 “always”. The higher the CD-RISC scores, the greater the resilience. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient values for CD-RISC was 0.952 in the present study.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The original data were exported from the Wenjuanxing questionnaire platform (https://www.wjx.cn/, accessed on 2 November 2020). SPSS 24.0 for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics including frequency, mean, and standard deviation were tested to describe the distribution of demographic, basic psychological needs, and resilience variables. As physical activity variables were non-normally distributed, we applied the median and interquartile range to describe the distribution. The Spearman correlation was used to calculate the correlation between each pair of measures. Hayes’ PROCESS macro in SPSS (version 3.3) was performed in the mediation analysis [45]. The bootstrap method (sampling was repeated 5000 times) was used to estimate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for significance testing of mediating effects. When the CI did not include zero, the direct or indirect effect was considered significant. All variables were standardized before entering the mediation model.

3. Results

3.1. Common Method Bias Analysis

We used factor analysis for common method bias testing. The chi-square statistic of Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) statistic = 0.973, p < 0.001). After analyzing the principal component, results revealed that the eigenvalues of 6 factors were >1 and the first factor explained 33.75% of the variance, which was lower than the threshold of 40%. This suggests the absence of serious common method biases in the present study [46].

3.2. Demographic Variables in the Sample

A total of 2954 questionnaires were commenced by students. After questionnaires with missing data were removed (n = 579), 2375 completed surveys were included for analysis. The response rate was 80.40%. The final sample consisted of 1110 (46.74%) male students and 1265 (53.26%) female students with a mean age of 20.25 years (SD = 2.04). Among the 2375 participating students, 1339 (56.38%) were from urban areas and 1103 (46.44%) were from one-child families. The distribution of students in each grade was: freshmen, 672 (28.29%); sophomore, 579 (24.38%); junior, 492 (20.72%); senior, 410 (17.26%), and postgraduate, 222 (9.35%). The distribution of students’ majors was as follows: sciences, 644 (27.12%); liberal arts, 757 (31.87%); engineering, 561 (23.62%); and medicine, 413 (17.39%).

3.3. Correlation Analysis

Descriptive statistics and a correlation matrix for physical activity, the satisfaction of three basic needs, and resilience are presented in Table 1. A bivariate correlation analysis showed that the variables were positively and significantly correlated with each other.

3.4. Regression Analysis

Table 2 demonstrates the regression coefficients of the mediating of the basic psychological needs of competence, autonomy, and relatedness between physical activity and resilience. The results showed that physical activity was significantly and positively associated with resilience and the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs. Meanwhile, the satisfaction of each basic need was positively associated with resilience.

3.5. Mediation Analysis

Mediation analysis was carried out to estimate the indirect effects of physical activity on resilience that are mediated by competence need, autonomy need, and relatedness need. Table 3 and Figure 2 show the mediation analysis results. The indirect effects of physical activity on resilience via the mediation of competence need (95% CI: 0.036−0.069), autonomy need (95% CI: 0.018−0.042), and relatedness need (95% CI: 0.009−0.031) were all significant, which accounted for 34.44%, 19.21%, and 12.58% of the total effect, respectively. The differences of indirect effects between competence and autonomy and between competence and relatedness were 0.023 (95% CI: 0.007−0.039) and 0.033 (95% CI: 0.020−0.048), respectively. The CIs did not include zero, indicating that the mediating effect of competence need was significantly greater than that of autonomy need and relatedness need. The difference of the indirect effects between autonomy need and relatedness need was 0.010 (95% CI: −0.002−0.023), and the CI included zero, indicating that there was no significant difference between autonomy need and relatedness need. The results showed that competence need had the greatest mediating effect between physical activity and resilience.

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationships between physical activity, basic psychological needs satisfaction, and resilience. Our major findings were as follows: (1) There was a significant and positive relationship between physical activity and resilience among Chinese college students; (2) the satisfaction of competence need, autonomy need, and relatedness need mediated the association between physical activity and resilience; and (3) the mediating effect of competence need was significantly greater than that of autonomy need and relatedness need.
Consistent with the previous studies [13,14,15,16], we found that physical activity was positively associated with resilience in our college student sample. The result is also supported by Hjemdal et al., who have argued that physical activity serves an important function in promoting psychological resilience [47]. Ozkara et al. have suggested that this may be because physical activity makes the cardiovascular system more efficient, and it does not need to do so much work to mobilize resources to cope with stressors [48]. Physical activity can also enhance the ability of emotional regulation by strengthening individual brain regions and large-scale neural circuits [49], so as to improve the mental resilience of college students. The more physical activity they engage in, the more resilient they will become [50]. In addition, Martinek and Hellison have pointed out that physical activity can stimulate optimism, hope, autonomy, and social support, which are core attributes of resilience [33]. In other words, physical activity may provide an appropriate setting for the acquisition of resilience attributes. Given that college students must endure many pressures and challenges in their study and daily life, greater involvement in physical activity is important, and it may represent a valuable way to support their resilience.
The present study found that the fulfillment of the competence need had the greatest mediating effect on the relationship between physical activity and resilience among college students. Our finding supports previous studies that physical activity exhibited a positive association with the degree of satisfaction of competence need [27,28]. A similar outcome was reached by Wilson et al., who indicated that people reported high levels of competence need satisfaction in exercise [51]. According to Ryan and Deci, the satisfaction of competence need occurs in high-quality social experiences [52]. Engaging in physical activity may acquire these social experiences, such as cooperation, obtaining feedback, and supporting the success of each other, which help to meet the participants’ needs for competence [34]. In line with the previous research [26], we found that competence need satisfaction was positively correlated with psychological resilience. To demonstrate greater resilience, individuals need to expend a lot of cognitive and behavioral effort [53]. According to basic psychological needs theory, the satisfaction of competence need enables people to maintain a high level of effort in the face of adversity [17]. In other words, competence need satisfaction promotes the perception of self-efficacy that results in the maintenance of high levels of effort-behaviors that reflect greater psychological resilience.
As shown by the results, the satisfaction of autonomy need exerted a small (nearly 20%) but significant mediating effect on the relationship between physical activity and resilience. We found that physical activity was positively associated with the satisfaction of autonomy need, which is consistent with previous studies [54,55,56]. Physical activity may be an antecedent to autonomy need satisfaction [55]. This is perhaps because physical activity can create an autonomy-supportive environment in which individuals feel a sense of self-determination. When individuals view their behaviors as self-endorsed, their need for autonomy is fulfilled [17]. People whose autonomy needs are satisfied are more likely to evaluate the situation as challenging rather than threatening, and have a higher perception of control over the environment [57]. This highlights how autonomy need satisfaction helps people cope with adversity and develop the psychological resilience required.
This study also revealed that the mediating effect of relatedness need satisfaction between physical activity and resilience is minimal (12.58%) but different from zero. The relatedness need is satisfied when individuals feel that they are significant and loved [17]. Physical activity can provide a context for social interaction where people foster connections with others and feel accepted [34]. Furthermore, the satisfaction of relatedness need promotes the perception of self-value and importance, which may enable the individual to cope with adversity or pursue goals with sustained efforts. That is, psychological resilience has been improved.
We found that the mediating effect of competence need between physical activity and resilience was significantly greater than that of autonomy need and relatedness need. This result supports the findings of Taylor et al., who have found that physical activity is more closely related to the satisfaction of competence need than to autonomy and relatedness needs [58]. This result also supports the study of Neufeld and Malin, who have suggested that resilience has the greatest correlation with competence compared with autonomy and relatedness, and only competence was associated with well-being through the mediating effect of resilience [26]. Taken together, the above results reveal the significance of considering the role of meeting competence need in the relationship between physical activity and resilience.
This study has significant implications. First, we provide evidence for the importance of physical activity in improving college students’ psychological resilience. Identifying the influencing factor (i.e., physical activity) would help to formulate corresponding strategies to promote resilience, which is helpful for college students to cope with threatening conditions and improve their well-being. Moreover, we apply the basic psychological needs theory to explain the association between physical activity and resilience, and therefore provide a theoretical basis for understanding the underlying mechanism. From this perspective, more effective and feasible physical activity programs can be designed in the future to satisfy autonomy need, relatedness need, and especially competence need of college students and thus improve their resilience.
Despite these positive findings, the current study is not without limitations. First, this is a cross-sectional study, therefore, the causal relationship between variables cannot be established. A longitudinal design should be employed in future research. Second, we used the self-reported scale IPAQ-SF to measure physical activity. Further research should consider using more objective measuring devices (e.g., accelerometers, pedometers) to measure the amount of physical activity. Third, participants were college students, and therefore the results of this sample may not be extended to other populations. Fourth, we suggest future research consider other variables that might influence the relationships in the study, for instance, internal locus of control, coping style, and so on.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that physical activity is significantly and positively associated with resilience among college students. More importantly, competence need, autonomy need, and relatedness need play mediating roles between physical activity and resilience, and competence need appears as the strongest mediator. We suggest that actively participating in physical activities to satisfy the basic psychological needs, especially competence need, might help to improve college students’ resilience.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.S., S.X. and S.T.; methodology, S.X. and G.S.; investigation, S.X., Z.M., S.T. and Z.L.; data curation, G.S. and S.X.; writing—original draft, S.X.; writing—review and editing, S.X., G.S., Z.L. and C.J.; project administration, G.S. and C.J.; funding acquisition, G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Social Science Fund of Shandong Province, China (No. 18DTYJ02), the Teaching Research Project of Shandong University (No. 2020Y076), and the Young Scholars Program of Shandong University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Public Health, Shandong University (protocol code No. 20190912).

Informed Consent Statement

Participants were informed that participation in the study was voluntary and that completing the questionnaire via online platform indicated their informed consent to participate this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants for their efforts in our study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Galatzer-Levy, I.R.; Burton, C.L.; Bonanno, G.A. Coping flexibility, potentially traumatic life events, and resilience: A prospective study of college student adjustment. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2016, 31, 542–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. American Psychological Association. The Road to Resilience. 2014. Available online: http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/road-resilience.aspx (accessed on 9 November 2020).
  3. Rutter, M. Resilience in the face of adversity: Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. Br. J. Psychiatry 1985, 147, 598–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rutter, M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 1987, 57, 316–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roy, A.; Carli, V.; Sarchiapone, M. Resilience mitigates the suicide risk associated with childhood trauma. J. Affect. Disord. 2011, 133, 591–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Haddadi, P.; Besharat, M.A. Resilience, vulnerability and mental health. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2010, 5, 639–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Shi, J.Y.; Chen, Z.T.; Yin, F.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, X.D.; Yao, Y.H. Resilience as moderator of the relationship between left-behind experience and mental health of Chinese adolescents. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 2016, 62, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Blackmon, B.J.; Lee, J.; Cochran, D.M.; Kar, B.; Rehner, T.A.; Baker, A.M. Adapting to life after hurricane Katrina and the deepwater horizon oil spill: An examination of psychological resilience and depression on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Soc. Work Public Health 2017, 32, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arslan, G. Mediating role of the self–esteem and resilience in the association between social exclusion and life satisfaction among adolescents. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2019, 151, 109514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Osofsky, H.J.; Osofsky, J.D.; Hansel, T.C. Deepwater horizon oil spill: Mental health effects on residents in heavily affected areas. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2011, 5, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hartley, M.T. Examining the Relationships between Resilience, Mental Health, and Academic Persistence in Undergraduate College Students. J. Am. Coll. Health 2011, 59, 596–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mcdermott, R.C.; Fruh, S.M.; Williams, S.; Hauff, C.; Graves, R.J.; Melnyk, B.M.; Hall, H.R. Nursing students’ resilience, depression, well-being, and academic distress: Testing a moderated mediation model. J. Adv. Nurs. 2020, 76, 3385–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xia, B.; Ma, Z.C.; Hu, Y.Y. Research on the Relationship between Physical Exercise, Psychological Flexibility and Positive Emotion of College Students Based on Computer Mathematical Model. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1578, 012009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Secer, E.; Yildizhan, Y.C. The Relationship between Physical Activity Levels and Psychological Resilience of University Students. Propós. Represent. 2020, 8, e598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dunston, E.R.; Messina, E.S.; Coelho, A.J.; Chriest, S.N.; Waldrip, M.P.; Vahk, A.; Taylor, K. Physical activity is associated with grit and resilience in college students: Is intensity the key to success? J. Am. Coll. Health 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. San Román-Mata, S.; Puertas-Molero, P.; Ubago-Jiménez, J.L.; González-Valero, G. Benefits of Physical Activity and Its Associations with Resilience, Emotional Intelligence, and Psychological Distress in University Students from Southern Spain. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychol. Inq. 2000, 11, 227–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. Nebr. Symp. Motiv. 1990, 38, 237–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ntoumanis, N.; Ng, J.Y.Y.; Prestwich, A.; Quested, E.; Hancox, J.E.; Thogersen-Ntoumani, C.; Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M.; Lonsdale, C.; Williams, G.C. A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: Effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychol. Rev. 2020, 1–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ryan, R.M.; Patrick, H.; Deci, E.L.; Williams, G.C. Facilitating health behavior change and its maintenance: Interventions based on self-determination theory. Eur. Health Psychol. 2008, 10, 2–5. [Google Scholar]
  21. Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M.; Gagné, M.; Leone, D.R.; Usunov, J.; Kornazheva, B.P. Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2001, 27, 930–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Nagpaul, T.; Pang, J.S. Materialism lowers well-being: The mediating role of the need for autonomy—correlational and experimental evidence. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 2016, 20, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Amato, M.P.; Lundberg, N.; Ward, P.J.; Schaalje, B.G.; Zabriskie, R. The Mediating Effects of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness during Couple Leisure on the Relationship Between Total Couple Leisure Satisfaction and Marital Satisfaction. J. Leis. Res. 2016, 48, 349–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abualkibash, S.K.; Lera, M.J. Resilience and basic psychological needs among Palestinian school students. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun. 2017, 10, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moltafet, G.; Firoozabadi, S.S.; Zarrincola, F.; Rod, H.K. Prediction of resiliency based on family communication patterns and satisfying basic psychological needs. Glob. J. Psychol. Res. 2015, 5, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Neufeld, A.; Malin, G. Exploring the relationship between medical student basic psychological need satisfaction, resilience, and well-being: A quantitative study. BMC Med. Educ. 2019, 19, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Behzadnia, B.; FatahModares, S. Basic Psychological Need-Satisfying Activities during the COVID-19 Outbreak. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 2020, 12, 1115–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fraguela-Vale, R.; Varela-Garrote, L.; Carretero-García, M.; Peralbo-Rubio, E.M. Basic Psychological Needs, Physical Self-Concept, and Physical Activity among Adolescents: Autonomy in Focus. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Babic, M.J.; Morgan, P.J.; Plotnikoff, R.C.; Lonsdale, C.; White, R.L.; Lubans, D.R. Physical activity and physical self-concept in youth: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014, 44, 1589–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Papaioannou, A.; Bebetsos, E.; Theodorakis, Y.; Christodoulidis, T.; Kouli, O. Causal relationships of sport and exercise involvement with goal orientations, perceived competence and intrinsic motivation in physical education: A longitudinal study. J. Sports Sci. 2006, 24, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kaydkhorde, H.; Moltafet, G.; Chinaveh, M. Relationship between Satisfying Psychological Needs and Resilience in High-school Students in Dezful Town. Acad. J. Psychol. Stud. 2014, 3, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  32. González, L.; Castillo, I.; Balaguer, I. Exploring the Role of Resilience and Basic Psychological Needs as Antecedents of Enjoyment and Boredom in Female Sports. Rev. Psicodidáct. (English ed.) 2019, 24, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martinek, T.J.; Hellison, D.R. Fostering resilience in underserved youth through physical activity. Quest 1997, 49, 34–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Doré, I.; Sylvester, B.; Sabiston, C.; Sylvestre, M.P.; O’Loughlin, J.; Brunet, J.; Bélanger, M. Mechanisms underpinning the association between physical activity and mental health in adolescence: A 6-year study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Rutter, M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In Risk and Protective Factors in the Development of Psychopathology; Rolf, J., Masten, A.S., Cicchetti, D., Nüchterlein, K.H., Weintraub, S., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 181–214. [Google Scholar]
  36. Stathi, A.; Fox, K.R.; McKenna, J. Physical activity and dimensions of subjective well-being in older adults. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2002, 10, 76–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. White, R.L.; Olson, R.; Parker, P.D.; Astell-Burt, T.; Lonsdale, C. A qualitative investigation of the perceived influence of adolescents’ motivation on relationships between domain-specific physical activity and positive and negative affect. Ment. Health Phys. Act. 2018, 14, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Macfarlane, D.J.; Lee, C.C.Y.; Ho, E.Y.K.; Chan, K.L.; Chan, D.T.S. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of IPAQ (short, last 7 days). J. Sci. Med. Sport 2007, 10, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. IPAQ Research Committee. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)—Short and Long Forms. 2005. Available online: http://www.ipaq.ki.se (accessed on 15 November 2020).
  40. Yu, C.F.; Zhang, W.; Zeng, Y.Y.; Ye, T.; Hu, J.P.; Li, D.L. Gratitude, basic psychological needs, and problematic Internet use in adolescents. Psychol. Dev. Educ. 2012, 28, 83–90. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  41. Gagné, M. The Role of Autonomy Support and Autonomy Orientation in Prosocial Behavior Engagement. Motiv. Emot. 2003, 27, 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Connor, K.M.; Davidson, J.R. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depress. Anxiety 2003, 18, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Windle, G.; Bennett, K.M.; Noyes, J. A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2011, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Yu, X.N.; Zhang, J.X. A comparison between the Chinese version of ego-resiliency scale and Connor-Davidson resilience scale. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 30, 1169–1171. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  45. Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  46. Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hjemdal, O.; Friborg, O.; Stiles, T.C.; Martinussen, M.; Rosenvinge, J.H. A new scale for adolescent resilience: Grasping the central protective resources behind healthy development. Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev. 2006, 39, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ozkara, A.B.; Kalkavan, A.; Alemdag, S.; Alemdag, C. The role of physical activity in psychological resilience. Baltic J. Sport Health Sci. 2016, 3, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Arida, R.; Teixeira-Machado, L. The Contribution of Physical Exercise to Brain Resilience. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2021, 14, 626769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Acebes-Sánchez, J.; Diez-Vega, I.; Esteban-Gonzalo, S.; Rodriguez-Romo, G. Physical activity and emotional intelligence among undergraduate students: A correlational study. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wilson, P.M.; Rogers, W.T.; Rodgers, W.M.; Wild, T.C. The Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2006, 28, 231–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development and Wellness; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  53. Iacoviello, B.M.; Charney, D.S. Psychosocial facets of resilience: Implications for preventing posttrauma psychopathology, treating trauma survivors, and enhancing community resilience. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 2014, 5, 23970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Curran, T.; Hill, A.P.; Ntoumanis, N.; Hall, H.K.; Jowett, G.E. A three-wave longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s mediation model of engagement and disaffection in youth sport. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2016, 38, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Gunnell, K.E.; Bélanger, M.; Brunet, J. A tale of two models: Changes in psychological need satisfaction and physical activity over 3 years. Health Psychol. 2016, 35, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kanning, M.; Hansen, S. Need Satisfaction Moderates the Association between Physical Activity and Affective States in Adults Aged 50+: An Activity-Triggered Ambulatory Assessment. Ann. Behav. Med. 2016, 51, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Ntoumanis, N.; Edmunds, J.; Duda, J.L. Understanding the coping process from a self-determination theory perspective. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2009, 14, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Taylor, I.M.; Ntoumanis, N.; Standage, M.; Spray, C.M. Motivational Predictors of Physical Education Students’ Effort, Exercise Intentions, and Leisure-Time Physical Activity: A Multilevel Linear Growth Analysis. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2010, 32, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Structural framework.
Figure 1. Structural framework.
Ijerph 18 03722 g001
Figure 2. Mediation effect analysis of basic psychological needs satisfaction between physical activity and resilience; *** p < 0.001. Demographic variables were controlled as covariances.
Figure 2. Mediation effect analysis of basic psychological needs satisfaction between physical activity and resilience; *** p < 0.001. Demographic variables were controlled as covariances.
Ijerph 18 03722 g002
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix for physical activity, basic psychological needs satisfaction, and resilience.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix for physical activity, basic psychological needs satisfaction, and resilience.
VariablesPhysical ActivityCompetence NeedAutonomy NeedRelatedness NeedResilience
Physical activity1.000----
Competence need0.112 **1.000---
Autonomy need0.101 **0.675 **1.000--
Relatedness need0.045 *0.680 **0.686 **1.000-
Resilience0.159 **0.605 **0.598 **0.586 **1.000
M/Me1908.00027.09931.34339.53490.067
SD/IQR2167.0005.5325.6687.46315.227
Notes: M = mean; SD = standard deviation; Me = Median; IQR = Interquartile Range; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table 2. Regression coefficients of the mediating of basic psychological needs satisfaction between physical activity and resilience.
Table 2. Regression coefficients of the mediating of basic psychological needs satisfaction between physical activity and resilience.
Outcome Variables Goodness-of-Fit IndicesRegression Coefficient and Significance
PredictorsRR2FΒt
Resilience 0.2230.05017.686 ***
Physical activity 0.1517.398 ***
Competence need 0.2090.04415.366 ***
Physical activity 0.1627.887 ***
Autonomy need 0.1880.03512.353 ***
Physical activity 0.1356.552 ***
Relatedness need 0.1890.03612.517 ***
Physical activity 0.0894.309 ***
Resilience 0.7040.496232.535 ***
Physical activity 0.0513.363 ***
Competence need 0.32313.501 ***
Autonomy need 0.2178.993 ***
Relatedness need 0.2139.168 ***
Notes: *** p < 0.001. Demographic variables were controlled as covariances.
Table 3. Mediating effects of basic psychological needs satisfaction between physical activity and resilience by the PROCESS macro. Demographic variables were controlled as covariances.
Table 3. Mediating effects of basic psychological needs satisfaction between physical activity and resilience by the PROCESS macro. Demographic variables were controlled as covariances.
Effect TypesPath95% CIEffect
Direct effectPhysical activity → Resilience0.021−0.0810.051
Indirect effectPhysical activity → Competence need → Resilience0.036−0.0690.052
Physical activity → Autonomy need → Resilience0.018−0.0420.029
Physical activity → Relatedness need → Resilience0.009−0.0310.019
Total indirect effect-0.068−0.1330.100
Total effect-0.111−0.1910.151
(C1)-0.007−0.0390.023
(C2)-0.019−0.0480.033
(C3)-−0.002−0.0230.010
Notes: CI: confidence interval. Specific indirect effect contrast definitions: (C1) = competence need minus autonomy need; (C2) = competence need minus relatedness need; (C3) = autonomy need minus relatedness need.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, S.; Liu, Z.; Tian, S.; Ma, Z.; Jia, C.; Sun, G. Physical Activity and Resilience among College Students: The Mediating Effects of Basic Psychological Needs. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3722. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073722

AMA Style

Xu S, Liu Z, Tian S, Ma Z, Jia C, Sun G. Physical Activity and Resilience among College Students: The Mediating Effects of Basic Psychological Needs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(7):3722. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073722

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Shanshan, Zongyu Liu, Siyu Tian, Zhiyao Ma, Cunxian Jia, and Guoxiao Sun. 2021. "Physical Activity and Resilience among College Students: The Mediating Effects of Basic Psychological Needs" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 7: 3722. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073722

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop