Next Article in Journal
Barriers and Facilitators for Exclusive Breastfeeding in Women’s Biopsychosocial Spheres According to Primary Care Midwives in Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)
Previous Article in Journal
Secondary School Nutrition Policy Compliance in Ontario and Alberta, Canada: A Follow-Up Study Examining Vending Machine Data from the COMPASS Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Caregivers’ and Health Extension Workers’ Perceptions and Experiences of Outreach Management of Childhood Illnesses in Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(7), 3816; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073816
by Atkure Defar 1,2,*, Kassahun Alemu 2, Zemene Tigabu 3, Lars Åke Persson 1,4 and Yemisrach B. Okwaraji 1,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(7), 3816; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073816
Submission received: 15 February 2021 / Revised: 26 March 2021 / Accepted: 31 March 2021 / Published: 6 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Children's Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript presented is very interesting and highly relevant. It is worth paying attention to how health workers deal with childhood illnesses.

The paper is also very well written. 

Here are some recommendations for improvement of the submitted manuscript:
- It would be interesting if the authors could indicate bibliographical references to support the chosen study methodology.
- What exclusion and inclusion criteria were used for each group of participants?
- The authors seem to describe more the methodology followed to capture the information from the mothers' group and less the workers' group. It would be interesting to specify more the procedure with the latter.
- On the other hand, it would be relevant for the authors to include possible lines for the future based on the work carried out.



Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Thank you for the opportunity to review your manuscript.  I offer the following recommendations for your consideration:

  1. Did this study receive Institutional Review Board approval?  If so, state the approval and institution granting the approval.
  2. The manuscript is quite repetitive throughout.  Revise the manuscript to reduce redundancy with respect to the findings.
  3. Please include the survey and interview instruments as an Appendix for those interested in replicating the work.
  4. Who was involved in the content thematic analysis? Describe this process in more detail.
  5. Discuss the findings in light of the small sample size.
  6. How do these findings impact policy and practice recommendations?  
  7. The discussion section should discuss the findings in light of the peer-reviewed literature.  Expand this discussion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The modifications made by the authors comply with the requirements made by this author. 

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for addressing my comment.

Back to TopTop