Next Article in Journal
Framing Environmental Health Decision-Making: The Struggle over Cumulative Impacts Policy
Previous Article in Journal
Earlier Is Better? Timing of Adductor Canal Block for Arthroscopic Knee Surgery under General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 8
10.3390/ijerph18083946
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationships between College Students’ Sedentary Behavior, Sleep Quality, and Body Mass Index

by
Wenxi Liu
1,2,
Qin Yuan
1,*,
Nan Zeng
3,
Daniel J. McDonough
2,
Kun Tao
1,
Qingwen Peng
1 and
Zan Gao
2,*
1
College of Kinesiology and Health Science, Huaihua University, Huaihua 418008, China
2
School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA
3
Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(8), 3946; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083946
Submission received: 8 February 2021 / Revised: 6 April 2021 / Accepted: 7 April 2021 / Published: 9 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Health Behavior, Chronic Disease and Health Promotion)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Purpose: Sedentary behavior (SB), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep duration (SD), and body mass index (BMI) are crucial determinants of an individual’s health. However, empirical evidence regarding associations between these factors in young adults living in China remains unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between accelerometer-measured SB, SE, SD, and BMI in Chinese college students. Methods: Two-hundred and twenty college students (115 females, Meanage = 20.29 years, SD = 2.37) were recruited from a south-central Chinese university. Participants’ SB (daily % time spent in SB), SE (number of minutes of sleep duration/number of minutes in bed), and SD were assessed via wrist-worn ActiGraph GT9X Link accelerometers for one week. Body weight was measured using a digital weight scale, height was measured using a stadiometer, and BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m2). Results: Participants’ average time spent in SB was 76.52% (SD = 10.03), SE was 84.12% (SD = 4.79), and BMI was 20.67 kg/m2 (SD = 3.12), respectively. Regression analyses indicated that SB (β = −0.17, p = 0.01) and BMI (β = −0.20, p < 0.01) negatively predicted SE. In addition, BMI negatively predicted SD (β = −0.22, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Prolonged SB (e.g., screen viewing, smartphone use, and computer playing) and higher BMI may link to shorter sleep duration and lower sleep efficiency in Chinese young adults. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm these findings. Given that increased BMI status and SB may relate to adverse health outcomes, more population-based intervention strategies seeking to lower BMI and reduce SB (e.g., nutrition education and physical activity promotion) are needed in this population.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of sedentary behavior (SB) has reached epidemic levels, and is now a major public health problem [1,2,3,4]. SB is defined as any waking behavior characterized by an energy expenditure of less than 1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs), such as sitting, reclining, or lying [5]. Regardless of one’s physical activity (PA) levels, SB has been observed to be an independent risk factor for the development of chronic morbidities, such as overweightness/obesity, cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and premature mortality [1,6,7,8,9,10]. Indeed, quantitative reviews have found that SB accounted for 3.8% of all-cause mortality, and also observed strong associations between SB and obesity, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes [11,12].
Sleep quality is important for health. Poor sleep quality has been associated with a number of negative health consequences, such as obesity, depression, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality [13]. The guidelines recommend that adults should obtain at least 7–9 h of sleep to maintain overall health and well-being [14]. However, the prevalence of poor sleep quality remains high, as 40% of young adults have reported having problems with sleep, such as lower sleep efficiency (i.e., the ratio of time sleeping divided by total time in bed), decreased sleep duration (i.e., shorter overall sleeping time), longer sleep latency (i.e., the amount of time it takes to fall asleep), and increased sleep disturbances (i.e., number of instances in which one wakes up) [15].
Previous studies have indicated that prolonged SB has been associated with poor sleep quality [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Moreover, a recent review found that prolonged SB is associated with an increased risk of insomnia and sleep disturbances [1]. In addition, a recent randomized controlled trial examined the effects of SB on sleep quality by randomly assigning active young adults into a SB intervention (increasing sedentary behavior intentionally) or a control group for one week, and found that young adults who increased their time in SB experienced significant decreases in sleep quality [16]. In addition, compiling research has indicated significant associations between SB, sleep quality, and obesity [22,23,24,25]. One recent study evaluated college students’ sleep quality and body fat mass, and found that poor sleep efficiency was strongly associated with increased fat mass in both men and women [23]. Another study examining young adults’ SB and sleep quality found that young adults who watched more than three hours of TV/screen viewing were at greater risk for sleep problems in early adulthood than those who watched less than three hours of TV/screen viewing per day [26]. The investigators concluded that prolonged SB was closely linked to poor sleep quality and increased risk of obesity.
Previous studies have indicated significant increases in SB and reductions in PA during the transition from high school to college [27]. Due to the nature of the higher education system, students may spend more time in SB, such as sitting in the classroom, reading in the library, and studying at home [28]. In China, many studies have been conducted in order to promote PA among this population; however, SB as an independent risk factor of health promotion has been rarely studied. Recently, a systematic scoping review synthesized 162 studies regarding the prevalence of SB in the Chinese population, and revealed a high prevalence of SB across various population groups [2]. However, only 3.7% of studies measuring SB adopted device-based instruments (i.e., accelerometer), and most of the studies (64.8%) were based on self-report questionnaires. In addition, the assessment of sleep quality among young adults primarily relied on self-reported surveys [18]. The lack of device-based measurements for SB and sleep in the Chinese college population limits the strength and generalizability of findings from the preceding study. In order to measure more precisely, more studies using device-based measurement on SB and sleep are warranted.
To fill the research gap regarding the examination of the relationships among SB, sleep quality, and weight status in young adults in China, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship among accelerometer-measured SB, sleep quality, and weight status. We hypothesized that SB and weight status would negatively associate with sleep quality (i.e., lower sleep efficiency and shorter sleep duration) among Chinese college students. Compared to previous studies assessing SB and sleep quality using self-report questionnaires, the present study aimed to provide assessments with higher reliability by use of accelerometers and examine the relationship among SB, sleep quality, and weight status. The findings of this study will help health professionals and researchers in developing effective intervention programs for improving sleep quality and overall health among college students.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

A total of 220 college students (115 females; Meanage = 20.29 years, SD = 2.37; MeanBMI = 20.67 kg/m2, SD = 3.12) from one university in south-central China were recruited for this study, and data were collected in June 2017. Inclusion criteria were (1) 18–25 years of age; (2) registered student at the study university at the time of data collection; (3) no self-report or diagnosed physical or mental disability; and (4) willing to provide informed consent to participate in the study.

2.2. Measurements

For sedentary behavior (SB), an ActiGraph GT9X Link (ActiGraph; Pensacola, FL, USA) accelerometer was used to capture participants’ time in SB. This accelerometer has been used in many studies, and has demonstrated good reliability and validity in assessing adults’ SB [29,30]. Accelerometers were initialized based on a 30 Hz sampling rate, and SB was defined as 0–99 counts per minute [31]. The analyses for SB were based on a 60 s epoch length. To validate wear time, the non-wear time was defined as intervals of at least 60 consecutive minutes of zero activity counts, allowing for up to two consecutive minutes of counts between 1 and 100 counts [32]. Participants were asked to wear the accelerometer on their non-dominant wrist for seven consecutive days (including at least two weekdays and one weekend day), as suggested from previous field-based accelerometer research [33]. Data were imported to and processed in ActiLife software (Version 6.13.3; Pensacola, FL, USA). Participants were asked to wear the accelerometers for seven consecutive days without removing the device [34]. Participants’ daily average percentage of SB was calculated as the study outcome.
For sleep efficiency (SE) and sleep duration (SD), the same accelerometers were also used to assess participants’ SE and SD. The Sadeh algorithm was used to determine waking and sleep movements, which has demonstrated good validity and reliability [35]. SD was defined as the total true sleep time. Participants’ SE was calculated as total sleep duration divided by total time in bed. Poor sleep was defined as a night of total sleep time less than seven hours or SE below 85% [19]. Sleep diaries (records of time in bed and out of bed) were used to facilitate the sleep analysis.
For body mass index (BMI), height was measured using Seca 213 stadiometer (Seca; Hamburg, Germany), and body weight was measured using Seca digital weight scale (Seca; Hamburg, Germany). When measuring height, participants were asked to remove their shoes and stand on the scale with their head oriented in the Frankfurt plane. Moreover, participants’ weight was measured in the morning and under standard conditions. Participants’ body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of their height (m2) [36]. BMI has been widely used to determine individuals’ weight status and has been categorized as normal weight (BMI = 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2), or obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) [37].

2.3. Procedure

The present study was approved by the study university’s ethics committee (20170606P1), and written informed consent was obtained from participants prior to any data collection. The researchers collected all anthropometric data during regularly scheduled college physical education classes. Participation was voluntary, and no extra credit was awarded to participating students. Accelerometers were required to be worn at all times and during all activities, except for swimming or taking a shower. The accelerometer-measured SB and sleep data (sleep efficiency and sleep duration) were collected during the seven-day wear period.

2.4. Data Analysis

Prior to data analyses, the validity of the SB data collected from participants was examined. In detail, participants with at least two weekdays and one weekend day of SB and sleep data were considered as valid for analysis. After the initial examination, all participants met the validation criteria. First, descriptive statistics were used to describe the participants’ demographic outcomes (e.g., age, gender), BMI, average daily SB (%), SE (%), and SD (minutes). Second, Pearson product–moment correlations were computed to examine the relationships between SB, SE, SD, and BMI. Third, multiple linear regression was used to examine the predictive associations among the study outcomes. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Data were analyzed by Statistical Package of the Social Sciences (SPSS Version 27; IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

Table 1 shows the participants’ characteristics and study outcomes. Descriptive statistics indicated that participants’ average time spent in SB was 76.52% (SD = 10.03), representing approximately 9.18 h spent in a sedentary position. SE was 84.12% (SD = 4.79), and SD was 341.67 min (SD = 80.65), indicating an average of 5.69 h (SD = 1.34) per day of sleep. Participants’ average BMI was 20.67 kg/m2 (SD = 3.12), indicating an overall healthy weight status of the present sample. Notably, we also compared the SB, SE, SD, and BMI between males and females. The results indicated that there was only one significant difference between gender in relation to BMI (p = 0.005, Cohen’s d = 3.07). Males (Mean = 21.29 kg/m2, SD = 3.54) had higher BMIs compared to females (Mean = 20.11 kg/m2, SD = 2.56) in this study sample.
Table 2 shows the correlations between study outcomes. Overall, significant relationships were observed among SB and SE (r = −0.16), SD and SE (r = 0.31), BMI and SE (r = −0.19), and BMI and SD (r = −0.22). In detail, SB was negatively correlated with SE (p = 0.02), SD was positively correlated with SE (p < 0.01) and BMI was negatively correlated with SE (p = 0.01) and SD (p < 0.01). Notably, the strength of the correlations among variables was weak. There were no significant correlations among the other outcomes. After controlling for gender, the significant correlations among variables were reexamined. Specifically, SB was negatively correlated with SE (r = −0.15), and BMI was negatively correlated with SE (r = −0.19) and SD (r = −0.23). Table 3 shows the results of the multiple linear regression analyses. In detail, SB, SD, and BMI were observed as predictors for sleep quality. Specifically, SB (β = −0.193, p = 0.01), SD (β = −0.299, p < 0.01), and BMI (β = −0.136, p < 0.01) negatively predicted SE and accounted for 15% of the observed variance. In addition, BMI negatively predicted SD (β = −0.222, p < 0.01), which explained 5% of variance.

4. Discussion

The present study used accelerometers to assess SB and sleep quality and examined the relationships between Chinese college students’ time spent in SB, SE, SD, and BMI. We observed that college students spent about 77% of their daily wake time in SB, which account for 9.18 h of SB per day. Similar findings were also reported in a recent systematic review study [2]. The results indicated that young adults reported more than 6 h (range: 6–10 h) of SB per day in China [2]. In addition, an international study that included 10 countries examined accelerometer-measured SB among adults, and found that the average time spent in SB was about nine hours [38], which is consistent with the time in SB observed in the current study. Furthermore, one study examining SB and SB-related correlates among Chinese college students observed a daily screen time prevalence of 73% of wake time [39]. In addition, the study indicated that greater amounts of screen time were associated with sitting time, and the high use of Internet among college students was associated with higher BMI [39]. Similarly, another study reported that the excessive use of smartphones significantly contributed to time spent in SB among Chinese college students. Indeed, young adults enter college with more autonomy than during high school, and as a result, most college students spend their leisure time in SBs, such as screen viewing, smartphone use, and playing on computers. The alarming prevalence of SB among college students warrants health professionals’ and researchers’ attention, as evidenced by the fact that prolonged SB is an independent risk factor associated with adverse health consequences, such as overweightness/obesity, poor sleep quality, cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, etc. [40,41,42].
Regarding sleep quality, the current study observed that participants had an overall SE of 84% which is below the recommended SE ratio of 85% [43]. In addition, we found that participants had an average of less than six hours of total sleep duration, which is also well below the recommended levels of at least seven hours of sleep per night for healthy adults [44]. Literature examining Chinese college students’ sleep quality correlates is sparse. Only one study has assessed college students’ sleep quality by using self-reported surveys, and it found that less than 26% of students reported having sleep problems, such as trouble falling to sleep, shorter overall sleep duration, and reoccurring sleep disturbances [45]. One meta-analysis reported an average of seven hours of sleep per night among Chinese college students; however, the included studies were all based on the self-reported sleep and wake time [46]. This study also found that the shorter sleep duration was associated with unhealthy sleep habits, such as smartphone use in bed and reading or watching media on electronic devices. A recent meta-analysis involving 18,619 medical students across 13 countries examined sleep-related problems, and found that the students averaged only six hours of sleep per night. Thus, the prevalence of poor sleep quality among college students warrants further investigation, and there is an urgent need to develop effective strategies by which to improve overall sleep quality in this population.
We hypothesized that SB may be negatively associated with sleep quality. In line with our hypothesis, the findings of the present study indicate that participants’ time spent in SB was negatively associated with their SE, indicating that the prolonged SB may lead to lower SE. This is in line with a previous study examining the associations among college students’ PA, SB, and sleep quality, which observed total sleep time to be negatively associated with SB, but there was no association between PA and sleep quality [19]. Their findings further suggest that poor sleep quality was more related to participants’ SB than their PA levels. Moreover, one meta-analysis examined the relationship between SB and sleep problems, and found that prolonged SB may lead to increased risk of insomnia and sleep disturbances. Notably, there are very limited experimental studies to further conclude the causal effect of SB on sleep issues. According to a recent meta-analysis examining Chinese college students’ sleep pattens, the prevalence of shorter sleep may be explained by several factors, such as late-night activities and early morning school demands, as well as smartphone use and screen viewing in bed before going to sleep [46]. Another study examining 1106 Chinese college students’ PA, screen time, and sleep quality observed that lower screen time was associated with greater sleep quality [39]. It appears that larger amounts of SB may be attributed to smartphone use and screen viewing (e.g., watching TV, computer use, and the use of other electronic devices) in Chinese college students. One way to combat SB is to increase PA time. Clear research evidence has suggested the beneficial effects of PA in reducing SB and improving overall sleep quality. However, one study examining Chinese college students’ PA and correlates found that students lacked motivation to engage in sufficient PA [27]. To this end, the observed negative association between SB and SE needs further experimental studies to conclude this relationship. As SB and sleep are important for health and well-being, future health practitioners and researchers are strongly encouraged to develop effective strategies for reducing the SB and improving sleep quality among college students.
In line with our second hypothesis, we also found that BMI was negatively associated with SE and SD, which indicates that higher BMI may lead to decreased SE and SD. Similar findings were found in a previous study [23] examining the relationship between sleep quality and obesity in college students, which found that lower SE was associated with higher fat mass. Notably, this study found that accelerometer-measured SE was positively associated with participants’ fat mass. However, given our study findings indicating an inverse relationship between BMI and SE, it appears that body composition and SE may have a mutual relationship and influence one another. Indeed, empirical studies have indicated that individuals with higher BMI are usually less active and report greater sedentary time, which is negatively associated with sleep quality [47,48]. Future investigations of the bi-directional relationships between sleep quality and body composition among college populations are needed. As previously discussed, it is very common that Chinese college students demonstrate unhealthy sleep habits, such as using smartphones, or reading or watching other electronic devices while in bed. Moreover, one review examined 50 epidemiological studies across populations around the world and observed a significant association between shorter sleep duration (i.e., under six hours per night) and increased risk of obesity [49]. Another explanation for this association may be derived from the hormonology perspective. Previous studies examining the association between regulation of ghrelin (a hunger-promoting hormone) and leptin (a hormone contributing to the perception of satiety) with sleep found an inhibitory effect of sleep on ghrelin secretion [50]. Simply stated, individuals’ secretion of ghrelin may increase with sleep deprivation, and may therefore lead to more energy intake during the night, which may ultimately contribute to an energy surplus, and thus, the elevated risk of developing overweightness/obesity. When considering the social and cultural norms in China, it is very common to consume food late at night, as reported in a recent meta-analysis examining the Chinese population regarding their sleep patterns and habits [46]. As the prevalence of overweightness/obesity continues to grow, college students not only should reduce their time spent in SB, but also need to establish good sleep habits in order to reduce their risk of overweightness/obesity. As an emerging topic among this population in China, future research should adopt longitudinal and experimental studies to further conclude causality and to develop effective strategies for improving SE and SD among Chinese college students.
The major strength of this study was the use of accelerometers to assess SB and sleep quality, as well as the examination of the relationships among SB, SE, SD, and BMI in Chinese college students. As most studies on this topic have relied on self-reported data, our findings provide more accurate and valid assessments that could help future studies develop more effective strategies or programs for promoting overall health in college students. Nevertheless, there are several potential limitations of the present study that must be acknowledged. First, the representativeness of study participants needs to be considered, as all participants were from one university in south-central China. Indeed, there are substantial differences in living habits, economic level, seasonal changes, and cultural contexts between the southern and northern parts of China. Thus, future studies with large-scale and more representative samples are warranted. Second, due to the cross-sectional nature of our study, the causal relationships between SB, sleep quality, and body composition could not be determined. Therefore, future longitudinal and experimental trials are strongly encouraged to further confirm the causality among SB, sleep quality, and body composition in the Chinese college student population. Third, we observed weak associations between our observed outcomes, and thus, caution is warranted when interpreting the findings of this study. Future studies with larger and more representative study samples are needed to more thoroughly examine these relationships. Lastly, although the use of accelerometers to determine SB and sleep provided more accurate assessments compared to self-reported surveys, caution is needed when processing the accelerometry data, because different epoch lengths may influence the sensitivity of detection between SB and PA [51] (e.g., a larger epoch length may lead to overestimation of SB). Our study used a 60 s epoch length when processing the accelerometry data, which may have overestimated the time spent in SB in this study. Notably, the 60-s epoch length has been used widely in many studies for assessing SB and sleep in free-living conditions [52]. Future studies are encouraged to use lower epoch lengths, (e.g., 1 s) [53] to process the data more accurately.

5. Conclusions

In this cross-sectional study, we found that both SB and BMI were negatively associated with sleep quality. The prolonged SB (e.g., screen viewing, smartphone use, and computer playing) and higher BMI status may lead to shorter sleep duration and lower sleep efficiency. As increased BMI and SB are linked to adverse health outcomes, more population-based prevention strategies seeking to reduce SB and improve sleep quality (e.g., lifestyle modification and PA promotion interventions) are needed in this population.

Author Contributions

W.L. and Q.Y. drafted the paper plan, conducted data analysis, and prepared the manuscript. N.Z. helped with data analysis and manuscript revision. D.J.M. conducted manuscript review and revision. K.T. and Q.P. contributed to participant recruitment, procedure process, and manuscript review and discussion. Z.G. developed the idea of the manuscript, oversaw data collection, conducted manuscript review and revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received no funding of any kind.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Huaihua University (No. 20170606P1).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the college student participants who participated in the study, as well as the laboratory assistants who gave their time to conduct the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The procedures were approved by the ethics review committees at the participating Universities and consent was obtained from all necessary levels prior to the start of this study.

Consent for Publication

All authors have approved the manuscript as submitted. My coauthors and I are responsible for reported research, and do not have any interests that might be interpreted as influencing the research, and AMA ethical standards were followed in the conduct of the study. All authors acknowledge ethical responsibility for the content of the manuscript and will accept the consequences of any ethical violations.

Availability of Data and Material

The data was collected on paper and transferred to electronical media on a computer spreadsheet for export to statistical packages. The paper data was stored in a locked file cabinet within the principal investigator’s office for a minimum of three years after the last participant has completed data collection. Electronic media files of the data were also stored for a minimum of three years on the principal investigator’s computer and on a computer within the University of Minnesota’s Physical Activity Epidemiology Laboratory. Both computers were password-encrypted and were only capable of being accessed by the principal investigator. The data collected during the current study will not be released or shared with anyone aside from participants.

Competing Interests

None of the authors have any real or perceived conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Yang, Y.; Shin, J.C.; Li, D.; An, R. Sedentary Behavior and Sleep Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2017, 24, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bao, R.; Chen, S.-T.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Zou, L.; Cai, Y. Sedentary Behavior Research in the Chinese Population: A Systematic Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pate, R.R.; O’Neill, J.R.; Lobelo, F. The Evolving Definition of “Sedentary”. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2008, 36, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lee, E.-Y.; Carson, V.; Jeon, J.Y.; Spence, J.C.; Tremblay, M.S. Levels and Correlates of 24-Hour Movement Behaviors among South Koreans: Results from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2014 and 2015. J. Sport Health Sci. 2019, 8, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tremblay, M.S.; Aubert, S.; Barnes, J.D.; Saunders, T.J.; Carson, V.; Latimer-Cheung, A.E.; Chastin, S.F.M.; Altenburg, T.M.; Chinapaw, M.J.M. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN)—Terminology Consensus Project Process and Outcome. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2017, 14, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Young, D.R.; Hivert, M.-F.; Alhassan, S.; Camhi, S.M.; Ferguson, J.F.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Lewis, C.E.; Owen, N.; Perry, C.K.; Siddique, J.; et al. Sedentary Behavior and Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016, 134, e262–e279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Matthews, C.E.; George, S.M.; Moore, S.C.; Bowles, H.R.; Blair, A.; Park, Y.; Troiano, R.P.; Hollenbeck, A.; Schatzkin, A. Amount of Time Spent in Sedentary Behaviors and Cause-Specific Mortality in US Adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 2012, 95, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hu, F.B.; Leitzmann, M.F.; Stampfer, M.J.; Colditz, G.A.; Willett, W.C.; Rimm, E.B. Physical Activity and Television Watching in Relation to Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Men. Arch. Intern. Med. 2001, 161, 1542–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, F.B.; Li, T.Y.; Colditz, G.A.; Willett, W.C.; Manson, J.E. Television Watching and Other Sedentary Behaviors in Relation to Risk of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Women. JAMA 2003, 289, 1785–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Edwardson, C.L.; Gorely, T.; Davies, M.J.; Gray, L.J.; Khunti, K.; Wilmot, E.G.; Yates, T.; Biddle, S.J.H. Association of Sedentary Behaviour with Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rezende, L.F.M.; Sá, T.H.; Mielke, G.I.; Viscondi, J.Y.K.; Rey-López, J.P.; Garcia, L.M.T. All-Cause Mortality Attributable to Sitting Time: Analysis of 54 Countries Worldwide. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2016, 51, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Proper, K.I.; Singh, A.S.; van Mechelen, W.; Chinapaw, M.J.M. Sedentary Behaviors and Health Outcomes among Adults: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011, 40, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shankar, A.; Syamala, S.; Kalidindi, S. Insufficient Rest or Sleep and Its Relation to Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes and Obesity in a National, Multiethnic Sample. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e14189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. CDC—How Much Sleep Do I Need? Sleep and Sleep Disorders. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/sleep/about_sleep/how_much_sleep.html (accessed on 11 January 2021).
  15. Kakinami, L.; O’Loughlin, E.K.; Brunet, J.; Dugas, E.N.; Constantin, E.; Sabiston, C.M.; O’Loughlin, J. Associations between Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Sleep Quality and Quantity in Young Adults. Sleep Health 2017, 3, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Edwards, M.K.; Loprinzi, P.D. Experimentally Increasing Sedentary Behavior Results in Decreased Sleep Quality among Young Adults. Ment. Health Phys. Act. 2017, 12, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grimaldi-Puyana, M.; Fernández-Batanero, J.M.; Fennell, C.; Sañudo, B. Associations of Objectively-Assessed Smartphone Use with Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Mood, and Sleep Quality in Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, K.; Xue, Y.; Fan, X.; Huang, T.; Chen, Z. Sedentary Behaviors, Psychological Status, and Sleep Quality in Chinese University Students. Soc. Behav. Personal. 2018, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hargens, T.A.; Scott, M.C.; Olijar, V.; Bigman, M.; Edwards, E.S. Markers of Poor Sleep Quality Increase Sedentary Behavior in College Students as Derived from Accelerometry. Sleep Breath 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aguilar-Farias, N.; Martino-Fuentealba, P.; Cortinez-O’Ryan, A.; Chandia-Poblete, D.; Celis-Morales, C.A.; Bahamondes, P.; Leppe Zamora, J.; Brown, W.J. The Descriptive Epidemiology of Sitting in Chilean Adults: Results from the National Health Survey 2009–2010. J. Sport Health Sci. 2019, 8, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lang, C.; Brand, S.; Colledge, F.; Ludyga, S.; Pühse, U.; Gerber, M. Adolescents’ Personal Beliefs about Sufficient Physical Activity Are More Closely Related to Sleep and Psychological Functioning than Self-Reported Physical Activity: A Prospective Study. J. Sport Health Sci. 2019, 8, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hsu, Y.-W.; Chang, C.-P.; Liu, C.-C. Relationships between Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity in Young Adults. Obes Res. Open J. 2019, 6, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kahlhöfer, J.; Karschin, J.; Breusing, N.; Bosy-Westphal, A. Relationship between Actigraphy-Assessed Sleep Quality and Fat Mass in College Students. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2016, 24, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Shields, M.; Tremblay, M.S. Sedentary Behaviour and Obesity. Health Rep. 2008, 19, 19–30. [Google Scholar]
  25. Maher, C.A.; Mire, E.; Harrington, D.M.; Staiano, A.E.; Katzmarzyk, P.T. The Independent and Combined Associations of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Obesity in Adults: NHANES 2003-06. Obesity 2013, 21, E730–E737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Johnson, J.G.; Cohen, P.; Kasen, S.; First, M.B.; Brook, J.S. Association between Television Viewing and Sleep Problems during Adolescence and Early Adulthood. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc Med. 2004, 158, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Tao, K.; Liu, W.; Xiong, S.; Ken, L.; Zeng, N.; Peng, Q.; Yan, X.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Lei, M.; et al. Associations between Self-Determined Motivation, Accelerometer-Determined Physical Activity, and Quality of Life in Chinese College Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Castro, O.; Bennie, J.; Vergeer, I.; Bosselut, G.; Biddle, S.J.H. Correlates of Sedentary Behaviour in University Students: A Systematic Review. Prev. Med. 2018, 116, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kelly, L.A.; McMillan, D.G.; Anderson, A.; Fippinger, M.; Fillerup, G.; Rider, J. Validity of Actigraphs Uniaxial and Triaxial Accelerometers for Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults in Laboratory Conditions. BMC Med. Phys. 2013, 13, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. McClain, J.J.; Sisson, S.B.; Tudor-Locke, C. Actigraph Accelerometer Interinstrument Reliability during Free-Living in Adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007, 39, 1509–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Freedson, P.S.; Melanson, E.; Sirard, J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. Accelerometer. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1998, 30, 777–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Knaier, R.; Höchsmann, C.; Infanger, D.; Hinrichs, T.; Schmidt-Trucksäss, A. Validation of Automatic Wear-Time Detection Algorithms in a Free-Living Setting of Wrist-Worn and Hip-Worn ActiGraph GT3X+. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Trost, S.G.; McIver, K.L.; Pate, R.R. Conducting Accelerometer-Based Activity Assessments in Field-Based Research. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2005, 37, S531–S543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Herrmann, S.D.; Barreira, T.V.; Kang, M.; Ainsworth, B.E. How Many Hours Are Enough? Accelerometer Wear Time May Provide Bias in Daily Activity Estimates. J. Phys. Act. Health 2013, 10, 742–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sadeh, A.; Sharkey, K.M.; Carskadon, M.A. Activity-Based Sleep-Wake Identification: An Empirical Test of Methodological Issues. Sleep 1994, 17, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Word Health Organization Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. Available online: http://www.who.int/entity/nutrition/publications/obesity/WHO_TRS_894/en/index.html (accessed on 17 March 2021).
  37. Garrow, J.S.; Webster, J. Quetelet’s Index (W/H2) as a Measure of Fatness. Int. J. Obes. 1985, 9, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Van Dyck, D.; Cerin, E.; De Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Hinckson, E.; Reis, R.S.; Davey, R.; Sarmiento, O.L.; Mitas, J.; Troelsen, J.; MacFarlane, D.; et al. International Study of Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time with Body Mass Index and Obesity: IPEN Adult Study. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 2015, 39, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Feng, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Du, Y.; Ye, Y.; He, Q. Associations of Physical Activity, Screen Time with Depression, Anxiety and Sleep Quality among Chinese College Freshmen. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Biswas, A.; Oh, P.I.; Faulkner, G.E.; Bajaj, R.R.; Silver, M.A.; Mitchell, M.S.; Alter, D.A. Sedentary Time and Its Association with Risk for Disease Incidence, Mortality, and Hospitalization in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2015, 162, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bouchard, C.; Blair, S.N.; Katzmarzyk, P.T. Less Sitting, More Physical Activity, or Higher Fitness? Mayo Clin. Proc. 2015, 90, 1533–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. De Rezende, L.F.M.; Rodrigues Lopes, M.; Rey-López, J.P.; Matsudo, V.K.R.; do Carmo Luiz, O. Sedentary Behavior and Health Outcomes: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ohayon, M.M.; Carskadon, M.A.; Guilleminault, C.; Vitiello, M.V. Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Sleep Parameters From Childhood to Old Age in Healthy Individuals: Developing Normative Sleep Values Across the Human Lifespan. Sleep 2004, 27, 1255–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hirshkowitz, M.; Whiton, K.; Albert, S.M.; Alessi, C.; Bruni, O.; DonCarlos, L.; Hazen, N.; Herman, J.; Katz, E.S.; Kheirandish-Gozal, L.; et al. National Sleep Foundation’s Sleep Time Duration Recommendations: Methodology and Results Summary. Sleep Health 2015, 1, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huang, Q.; Li, Y.; Huang, S.; Qi, J.; Shao, T.; Chen, X.; Liao, Z.; Lin, S.; Zhang, X.; Cai, Y.; et al. Smartphone Use and Sleep Quality in Chinese College Students: A Preliminary Study. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, L.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Wang, S.-B.; Li, L.; Lu, L.; Ng, C.H.; Ungvari, G.S.; Chiu, H.F.K.; Hou, C.-L.; Jia, F.-J.; et al. Sleep Duration and Sleep Patterns in Chinese University Students: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2017, 13, 1153–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lakerveld, J.; Mackenbach, J.D.; Horvath, E.; Rutters, F.; Compernolle, S.; Bárdos, H.; De Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Charreire, H.; Rutter, H.; Oppert, J.-M.; et al. The Relation between Sleep Duration and Sedentary Behaviours in European Adults. Obes. Rev. 2016, 17 (Suppl. 1), 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Buman, M.P.; Kline, C.E.; Youngstedt, S.D.; Phillips, B.; Tulio de Mello, M.; Hirshkowitz, M. Sitting and Television Viewing: Novel Risk Factors for Sleep Disturbance and Apnea Risk? Results from the 2013 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll. Chest 2015, 147, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Beccuti, G.; Pannain, S. Sleep and Obesity. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2011, 14, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Omisade, A.; Buxton, O.M.; Rusak, B. Impact of Acute Sleep Restriction on Cortisol and Leptin Levels in Young Women. Physiol. Behav. 2010, 99, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Banda, J.A.; Haydel, K.F.; Davila, T.; Desai, M.; Bryson, S.; Haskell, W.L.; Matheson, D.; Robinson, T.N. Effects of Varying Epoch Lengths, Wear Time Algorithms, and Activity Cut-Points on Estimates of Child Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity from Accelerometer Data. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Migueles, J.H.; Cadenas-Sanchez, C.; Ekelund, U.; Delisle Nyström, C.; Mora-Gonzalez, J.; Löf, M.; Labayen, I.; Ruiz, J.R.; Ortega, F.B. Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations. Sports Med. 2017, 47, 1821–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gao, Z.; Zeng, N.; Pope, Z.C.; Wang, R.; Yu, F. Effects of Exergaming on Motor Skill Competence, Perceived Competence, and Physical Activity in Preschool Children. J. Sport Heal Sci. 2019, 8, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants and descriptive statistics of study outcomes (n = 220).
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants and descriptive statistics of study outcomes (n = 220).
MeanSD
Age (year)20.32.4
Height (cm)164.810.0
Weight (kg)57.813.3
BMI (kg/m2)20.73.1
Sedentary Behavior (%)76.510.0
Sleep Efficiency (%)84.14.8
Sleep Duration (minute)341.780.7
Note: BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Correlation analyses among study outcomes.
Table 2. Correlation analyses among study outcomes.
123
1. Sedentary Behavior-
2. Sleep Efficiency−0.157 *-
3. Sleep Duration0.0960.311 **-
4. BMI−0.128−0.192 **−0.222 **
Note: ** correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); * correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed); BMI, body mass index.
Table
Table 3. Regression analyses among study outcomes.
Table 3. Regression analyses among study outcomes.
Dependent
Variables		Independent
Variables		βR2p
Sleep EfficiencyBMI−0.1360.150.037
Sedentary Behavior−0.1930.003
Sleep Duration0.299<0.001
Sleep DurationBMI−0.2220.050.001
Note: β, standardized regression coefficient; R2, proportion of variance that can be explained by independent variables; BMI, body mass index.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, W.; Yuan, Q.; Zeng, N.; McDonough, D.J.; Tao, K.; Peng, Q.; Gao, Z. Relationships between College Students’ Sedentary Behavior, Sleep Quality, and Body Mass Index. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083946

AMA Style

Liu W, Yuan Q, Zeng N, McDonough DJ, Tao K, Peng Q, Gao Z. Relationships between College Students’ Sedentary Behavior, Sleep Quality, and Body Mass Index. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(8):3946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083946

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Wenxi, Qin Yuan, Nan Zeng, Daniel J. McDonough, Kun Tao, Qingwen Peng, and Zan Gao. 2021. "Relationships between College Students’ Sedentary Behavior, Sleep Quality, and Body Mass Index" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 8: 3946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083946

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop