Peer-Review Record
Reply to Viner, A.; Ayrey, S. Comment on “Scheepers et al. Comparative Performance Testing of Respirator versus Surgical Mask Using a Water Droplet Spray Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1599”
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(10), 6296; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106296
by
Paul T. J. Scheepers 1,*
, Heiman F. L. Wertheim 2,3, Maurice van Dael 1, Rob Anzion 1, Henk Jan Holterman 4, Steven Teerenstra 5, Martijn de Groot 6, Andreas Voss 2,3,7 and Joost Hopman 2,3
, Heiman F. L. Wertheim 2,3, Maurice van Dael 1, Rob Anzion 1, Henk Jan Holterman 4, Steven Teerenstra 5, Martijn de Groot 6, Andreas Voss 2,3,7 and Joost Hopman 2,3Reviewer 1:
Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(10), 6296; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106296
Submission received: 2 May 2022
/
Accepted: 19 May 2022
/
Published: 22 May 2022
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The reply to the comment reports clearly the authors' point of view. They answered to every point raised by Viner and Ayreythe. The comment and the reply from the authors of the article are both worthy of publication and useful to the readers. English proofreading is required. Example: page1 line 29, "measurement of TIL in the described in EN149" I guess should be "measurement of TIL AS described in EN149". Page 2, line 51, "Our research complements findings in real life based reflecting a large body of evidence" should be "Our research complements findings in real life based ON a large body of evidence".
