Next Article in Journal
Can Fear of COVID-19 Be Predicted by Religiosity and Trust in Institutions among Young Adults? A Prospective Cross-National Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Speed of Optic Flow Stimuli Influences Body Sway
Previous Article in Journal
Perceived Risk of COVID-19 and Employee Decision-Making: How Psychological Distress during the Pandemic Increases Negative Performance Outcomes among Healthcare Workers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Variability of Postural Stability and Plantar Pressure Parameters in Healthy Subjects Evaluated by a Novel Pressure Plate
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 11
10.3390/ijerph19116765
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optic Flow Speed and Retinal Stimulation Influence Microsaccades

by
Milena Raffi
1,*,
Aurelio Trofè
2,
Andrea Meoni
1,
Luca Gallelli
3,4 and
Alessandro Piras
1
1
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
2
Department of Quality of Life, University of Bologna, 47921 Rimini, Italy
3
Department of Health Science, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
4
Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance Unit, Mater Domini Hospital Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(11), 6765; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116765
Submission received: 3 May 2022 / Revised: 28 May 2022 / Accepted: 29 May 2022 / Published: 1 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue How Visual and Spatial Orientation Contribute to the Control of Postural Balance in Public Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Microsaccades are linked with extraretinal mechanisms that significantly alter spatial perception before the onset of eye movements. We sought to investigate whether microsaccadic activity is modulated by the speed of radial optic flow stimuli. Experiments were performed in the dark on 19 subjects who stood in front of a screen covering 135 × 107° of the visual field. Subjects were instructed to fixate on a central fixation point while optic flow stimuli were presented in full field, in the foveal, and in the peripheral visual field at different dot speeds (8, 11, 14, 17, and 20°/s). Fixation in the dark was used as a control stimulus. For almost all tested speeds, the stimulation of the peripheral retina evoked the highest microsaccade rate. We also found combined effects of optic flow speed and the stimulated retinal region (foveal, peripheral, and full field) for microsaccade latency. These results show that optic flow speed modulates microsaccadic activity when presented in specific retinal portions, suggesting that eye movement generation is strictly dependent on the stimulated retinal regions.

1. Introduction

Eye movements are used to scan the environment to select visual stimuli, so they are critically important in determining what we see and attend to [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Microsaccades are small eye movements produced during attempted fixations. In past decades, studies on microsaccades have successfully demonstrated their role in contrasting visual fading [11,12], driving attentional and discrimination tasks [13,14,15,16,17], and processing the visual field [18,19,20,21,22].
The optic flow field is a crucial input to navigate the environment. Several neurophysiological studies demonstrated specific neuronal sensitivity to optic flow in some cortical and subcortical areas of the monkey’s brain [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Some studies showed optic flow sensitivity in various areas of the human brain, such as areas MST and V3A [36], area MT [37] and the fronto-temporo-parietal network [38].
Speed represents an important input while navigating the environment. Neuronal sensitivity to speed has been demonstrated in areas 7a and MST in the monkey [39,40]. Several studies on human subjects report that many motor actions such as steering or walking are influenced by the speed of optic flow patterns. Kountouriotis et al. [41] showed that the human brain performs global averaging of optic flow speed from the visual field and uses this signal as an input for steering control. Durgin and Gigone [42] demonstrated that the discrimination thresholds for appropriate visual speeds are enhanced during walking. Gait parameters are modulated by optic flow speed; when optic flow speed decreases, walking speed and stride length increase [43,44]. The motor response to heading perception is also modulated by the speed of optic flow patterns [45].
In a previous study, we used optic flow stimuli to reveal the relationship between heading perception and microsaccades in a discrimination task. The results demonstrated that microsaccades’ characteristics and directions are related to heading perception [20]. In the present work, we moved on to analyze the microsaccades’ characteristics during the view of radial optic flow stimuli with different dot speeds. The rationale for this study arises from evidence that during daily life, our gaze explores the visual field while we move in the environment at different speeds of motion; i.e., we can walk slowly in a downtown street while looking at stores, we can walk quickly in a busy road while scanning the environment to cross the street, and we can run in the park while looking straight ahead to keep the right heading. During walking, people discover the relationship among the magnitudes of optic flow produced by varying magnitudes of walking [46]. All of our daily behaviors change the optic flow fields depending on the task we are performing [47,48,49]; thus, our nervous system continuously shifts from covert to overt attention [50,51,52]. Given that microsaccades seem to indicate where we unconsciously focus our attention [53,54], we aimed to verify whether the speed of the optic flow stimulus could directly influence microsaccades’ generation and properties.

2. Materials and Methods

Experiments were performed on 19 healthy volunteers, 9 females and 10 males, who had normal or corrected to normal vision. The subjects’ ages ranged from 21 to 35 years (average 27.9 ± 4.2 SD). Before the beginning of the experiment, each participant signed a written informed consent form. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Bioethic Committee of the University of Bologna. The experiments were performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.
To assess hand and foot laterality, each participant completed a laterality test, which is a revised version of the standardized Waterloo Footedness Questionnaire (WFQ) and Waterloo Handedness Questionnaire (WHQ) [55,56]:
[(right preference − left preference)/(right preference + left preference)] × 100
A positive index indicates right dominance, while a negative index indicates left dominance. The cut-off points to determine the degree of handiness of the participants were 70 for right-handed and −70 for left-handed. The rationale for computing a laterality index was to correlate the microsaccades’ directions with the dominant side in order to elucidate the potential mechanisms for motor control.

2.1. Optic Flow Stimuli

In this experiment, we presented three types of optic flow stimuli that stimulated different portions of the visual field: foveal, full, and peripheral (Figure 1A–C). In this study, we used the same stimuli described in a previous paper [57]. In brief, we considered the foveal visual field as the 7° surrounding the fovea. We considered the periphery as the visual field outside the inner 20° of the foveal visual field. The stimuli were generated by white dots with a luminous intensity of 1.3 cd/m2 and a size of 0.4°. The stimuli were back-projected onto a translucent screen that covered 135 × 107° of the visual field. All recordings were performed in a dark room with dark walls. Each participant was instructed to look at a fixation point (FP) of 0.6° in size without moving the head. The screen height was adjusted for each subject to have the FP in the primary position. The subjects were positioned 115 cm away from the screen. To assess the dependence of microsaccades on the velocity of the stimulus, we varied the dot speed in all three stimuli, thereby obtaining 15 different conditions; the tested speeds of the optic flow stimulus were: 8°/s, 11°/s, 14°/s, 17°/s, and 20°/s. A control stimulus (baseline) consisted of simple fixation on a dark screen (Figure 1D). Optic flow stimuli were produced using Matlab psychophysical toolbox (The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). We recorded 2 repetitions for both the baseline and the optic flow stimuli with different speeds; thus, each subject performed 32 trials. Each trial lasted 30 s.

2.2. Eye Movements and Eye Position Recordings

In this experiment, horizontal and vertical eye movements were recorded using an EyeLink video-based eye tracking system (EyeLink® II, SR Research Ltd., Mississauga, ON, Canada), which consists of two miniature cameras mounted on a leather-padded headband. Pupil tracking was recorded at 500 Hz, with high spatial resolution (<0.005°) and low noise (<0.01°). At the beginning of each recording session, we calibrated the eye tracking; we instructed the subject to fixate on a target presented in a random order in a nine-point 25 × 25° square grid. After correct camera calibration, the data were validated, and drift correction was executed by applying a corrective offset to the raw eye-position.

2.3. Data Analysis

Microsaccades are defined as small eye movements that occur during prolonged visual fixation with an amplitude of less than 1° [58]. To identify microsaccades, we developed an algorithm based on that of Otero-Millan [59], and it has already been used in a previous study [60]. To reduce the amount of potential noise, we considered only binocular microsaccades for at least 3 data samples (6 ms). Trials with incorrect fixations, eye blinks, or behavioral errors were discarded. Portions of data with very fast decreases and increases in the pupil area (>50 units/sample) were removed from the analysis, given that such periods are likely semi-blinks where the pupil is never fully occluded. We also ignored the 200 ms before and after each blink/semi-blink to eliminate the initial and final periods when the pupil was still partially occluded [61].
We computed the amplitude, duration, latency, rate and peak velocity of microsaccades for each subject in each trial and in each condition. Then, we averaged the values for all subjects in each condition and trial. We computed the microsaccade rates considering only time spent in fixation periods; the total number of microsaccades for each subject in each trial was divided by the total time spent in fixation during that specific trial. We computed the microsaccades’ latency by averaging all latency from the trial’s onset.
Statistical analysis was performed using a repeated-measures ANOVA with stimuli (foveal, full field, and periphery) and speed (8, 11, 14, 17, and 20°/s) as within-subject factors and with the baseline as covariant (SPSS® 22.0, Chicago, IL, USA). Results were considered significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

The analysis of the laterality test showed that 16 participants were strongly right-handed as values were above 78. Three subjects were left-handed, and their values were −44, −55, and −89, indicating a strong left laterality for only one subject.
The analysis of the repeated measures ANOVA showed that the microsaccades’ peak velocity, latency, and rate showed significant effects, while the microsaccades’ amplitude and duration did not show any significant effect.

3.1. Microsaccades Peak Velocity

The ANOVA performed on the microsaccades’ peak velocity showed a main effect of stimulus (F1,2 = 3.676, p = 0.037, ηp2 = 0.197) and an interaction effect of stimulus × baseline (F1,2 = 4.601, p = 0.018, ηp2 = 0.235). Figure 2 shows the changes in the microsaccades’ peak velocity across stimuli, and it shows that the baseline differed from the three optic flow stimuli.
The non-significant effects values were: speed (F1,4 = 1.857, p = 0.130, ηp2 = 0.110), speed × baseline (F1,4 = 1.771, p = 0.146, ηp2 = 0.106), speed x stimulus (F1,8 = 0.469, p = 0.876, ηp2 = 0.030), and speed × stimulus × baseline (F1,8 = 0.480, p = 0.869, ηp2 = 0.031).

3.2. Microsaccades Latency

The ANOVA performed on the microsaccades’ latency showed an interaction effect of stimulus × speed (F1,8 = 2.842, p = 0.006, ηp2 = 0.159), indicating a combined effect of optic flow speed and the stimulated retinal region. The results also show an interaction effect of stimulus × speed × baseline (F1,8 = 2.734, p = 0.008, ηp2 = 0.154), indicating that the combined effect of optic flow speed and the stimulated retinal region differed from the baseline. The Bonferroni pairwise comparison showed the following differences: baseline vs. 11°/s P, p = 0.027; baseline vs. 20°/s P, p = 0.001; 8°/s FO vs. 8°/s FU; p = 0.040; 8°/s FO vs. 20°/s P, p = 0.002; 8°/s FU vs. 11°/s P, p = 0.002; 8°/s P vs. 11°/s P, p = 0.024; 8°/s P vs. 20°/s P, p = 0.023; 11°/s FU vs. 11°/s P, p = 0.009; 11°/s FO vs. 11°/s P, p = 0.009; 11°/s P vs. 14°/s FO, p = 0.006; 11°/s P vs. 17°/s FO, p = 0.009; 11°/s P vs. 17°/s FU, p = 0.044; 11°/s P vs. 17°/s P, p = 0.012; 11°/s P vs. 20°/s FO, p = 0.031; 11°/s P vs. 20°/s FU, p = 0.004; 11°/s P vs. 20°/s P, p < 0.001; 14°/s FU vs. 20°/s P, p = 0.007; 17°/s FU vs. 20°/s P, p = 0.048. Figure 3 shows microsaccade latency in all conditions. The microsaccades’ latency differed within and across stimuli.
The non-significant effects values were: speed (F1,4 = 0.400, p = 0.808, ηp2 = 0.026), speed × baseline (F1,4 = 0.487, p = 0.745, ηp2 = 0.031), stimulus (F1,2 = 0.525, p = 0.597, ηp2 = 0.034), and stimulus × baseline (F1,2 = 0.525, p = 0.597, ηp2 = 0.034).

3.3. Microsaccades Rate

The ANOVA performed on microsaccade rate showed a main effect of stimulus (F1,2 = 4.774, p = 0.016, ηp2 = 0.241) and an interaction effect of speed × stimulus × baseline (F1,8 = 2.623, p = 0.011, ηp2 = 0.149), indicating that the combined effect of optic flow speed and the stimulated retinal region differed from the baseline. The Bonferroni pairwise comparison showed the following differences: baseline vs. 8°/s FO°/s, p = 0.043; baseline vs. 8°/s FU, p = 0.041; baseline vs. 11°/s FO, p = 0.014; 8°/s P vs. 11°/s FO, p = 0.029; 11°/s FO vs. 14°/s P, p = 0.039. Figure 4 shows that the stimulation of the peripheral retina evoked a higher microsaccade rate.
The non-significant effects values were: speed (F1,4 = 1.718, p = 0.158, ηp2 = 0.103), speed × baseline (F1,4 = 1.498, p = 0.214, ηp2 = 0.091), stimulus × baseline (F1,2 = 3.076, p = 0.061, ηp2 = 0.170), and speed × stimulus (F1,8 = 1.526, p = 0.155, ηp2 = 0.092).

4. Discussion

When we move in the environment, we precisely evaluate our heading and speed. Speed information can be obtained by integrating visual speed from optic flow and locomotion. Given the importance of optic flow for navigation in the environment and the involvement of microsaccades in visual processing, we sought to investigate whether microsaccadic activity is modulated by the speed of radial optic flow stimuli. In this study we decided to test five speeds (8, 11, 14, 17, and 20°/s), starting from 8°/s, which represents a slow walk, and ending with 20°/s, which represents a fast run. The results show that the microsaccades’ latency and rate were influenced by the speed of radial optic flow stimuli in combination with the stimulated retinal region.
Microsaccade rate is linked to cognitive load in several neural processes. Microsaccade rate is modulated by the load of the working memory [62] and by action preparation [63,64,65]. During mental arithmetic processing, task difficulty has been shown to reduce microsaccade rate [66,67]. Valsecchi and colleagues [68,69] showed that a reduced microsaccade rate might be related to memory updating. Betta and Turatto [70] found a strong reduction in microsaccade rate during the preparation of a manual response. Piras et al. [15] performed an experiment on goalkeepers who needed to predict the ball direction of a penalty kick. The results of that study showed that the temporal sequence of microsaccade rates decreased by ~1000 ms just before the goalkeepers’ final movement initiation. There is a general consensus about the inverse relationship between microsaccade rate and cognitive load. Our results indicate that microsaccade rate is influenced by both the optic flow speed and the stimulated retinal region. Microsaccade rate is significantly higher in the peripheral stimulation at almost all tested speeds. This result could be interpreted in the framework of the stabilizing effect that stimulation of the peripheral retina has on postural control. While it must be noted that the literature is somewhat controversial, several studies agree with the view that stimulation of the peripheral visual field stabilizes posture (cfr. [71] for review), so it is possible to hypothesize that such a stabilizing effect requires a lighter cognitive load allowing the generation of more microsaccades in a search strategy.
The present results are also in line with those of previous perceptual studies. It has been shown that when a cue is shown in a peripheral portion of the visual field, the frequency of microsaccades in the cue’s direction increases [54,72]. On the other hand, when a cue is presented centrally, the frequency of microsaccades takes more time to move in the cue’s direction [53,73]. Although there was no specific attentional cue in the present study, the moving dots in various portions of the visual field were a powerful visual stimulus. Neuronal density and spatial resolution are low in the peripheral retina because it is specialized for movement detection and sensitivity; the cortical regions that process this information are also limited in size with respect to the processing of foveal information [74]. Peripheral visual function has a more pivotal role than that of central vision in locomotion and postural stability (cfr. [74] for review), so it is reasonable that the frequency of microsaccades increases with peripheral vision.
The latency of the microsaccades showed combined effects between optic flow speed and the stimulated retinal region. As evident from Figure 3, in some cases, microsaccades were more concentrated toward the end of the trial (i.e., 11°/s periphery, 14°/s periphery, and 8°/s fovea), while in some other cases, they occurred more at the beginning of the trial (i.e., 20°/s periphery and 8°/s full field). This lack of clear relationship between optic flow speed and stimulus could be due to the nature of the task. First, each trial lasted 30 s allowing the generation of several microsaccades (about 30–50 per trial). Second, the participants were instructed to keep their gaze on a central target, and the dots did not have any behavioral meaning. Although it is important to show and discuss this interaction effect between optic flow speed and the stimulated retinal region, we believe that more studies are needed to access the main effect of speed on latency. Future studies should be designed using very short trials that allow the recording of only one microsaccade per trial.
It is worth noting the lack of a significant main effect of optic flow speed; indeed, we found combined effects only. In this experiment, we instructed our subjects to keep their gaze on the fixation point while ignoring the optic flow field. As already stated by Hafed et al. [75], it is necessary to study microsaccades in experiments that require fixation to be able to make inferences about vision and cognitive processes. As shown by Wang et al. [76], the view of radial expanding optic flow stimuli attracts attention toward the focus of expansion. It is possible that the experimental conditions used in this study were not optimal to uncover stimulus speed modulation on microsaccades. A task designed with an attentional cue upon different optic flow speed may be helpful in determining the exact relationship between microsaccades and stimulus speed.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we showed that microsaccades are modulated by the speed of optic flow stimuli when presented in specific retinal regions. The peripheral retina plays a critical role in visual motion perception. It is thus possible to hypothesize that such high generation of microsaccades is used in heading perception strategies. All things considered, the present results seem to suggest a different involvement of retinal regions in triggering microsaccades.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.; methodology, M.R. and A.P.; software, A.P. and L.G.; validation, A.T. and L.G.; formal analysis, M.R. and A.P.; investigation, A.M.; resources, M.R.; data curation, A.T. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.; writing—review and editing, A.P. and L.G.; visualization, M.R.; supervision, A.P.; project administration, M.R.; funding acquisition, M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Bologna, RFO Program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Bioethics Committee of the University of Bologna (protocol code 224109, approval date 26 September 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article because of the consent provided by participants on the use of confidential data.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the participants of the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andersen, R.A.; Bracewell, R.M.; Barash, S.; Gnadt, J.W.; Fogassi, L. Eye position effects on visual, memory, and saccade-related activity in areas LIP and 7a of macaque. J. Neurosci. 1990, 10, 1176–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Andersen, R.A.; Essick, G.; Siegel, R.M. Neurons of area 7a activated by both stimuli and oculomotor behavior. Exp. Brain Res. 1987, 67, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chelazzi, L.; Biscaldi, M.; Corbetta, M.; Peru, A.; Tassinari, G.; Berlucchi, G. Oculomotor activity and visual spatial attention. Behav. Brain Res. 1995, 71, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Corbetta, M.; Akbudak, E.; Conturo, T.E.; Snyder, A.Z.; Ollinger, J.M.; Drury, H.A.; Linenweber, M.R.; Petersen, S.E.; Raichle, M.E.; Van Essen, D.C.; et al. A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 1998, 21, 761–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Bremmer, F.; Graf, W.; Ben Hamed, S.; Duhamel, J.-R. Eye position encoding in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP). Neuroreport 1999, 10, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guo, K.; Li, C.Y. Eye position-dependent activation of neurones in striate cortex of macaque. Neuroreport 1997, 8, 1405–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Otero-Millan, J.; Troncoso, X.G.; Macknik, S.L.; Serrano-Pedraza, I.; Martinez-Conde, S. Saccades and microsaccades during visual fixation, exploration, and search: Foundations for a common saccadic generator. J. Vis. 2008, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Piras, A.; Malagoli Lanzoni, I.; Raffi, M.; Persiani, M.; Squatrito, S. The within-task criterion to determine successful and unsuccessful table tennis players. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2016, 11, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Raffi, M.; Squatrito, S.; Maioli, M.G. Gaze and smooth pursuit signals interact in parietal area 7m of the behaving monkey. Exp. Brain Res 2007, 182, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pierrot-Deseilligny, C.; Gray, F.; Brunet, P. Infarcts of both inferior parietal lobules with impairment of visually guided eye movements, peripheral visual inattention and optic ataxia. Brain 1986, 109, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martinez-Conde, S.; Macknik, S.L.; Hubel, D.H. The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Martinez-Conde, S.; Macknik, S.L.; Troncoso, X.G.; Hubel, D.H. Microsaccades: A neurophysiological analysis. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Barnhart, A.S.; Costela, F.M.; Martinez-Conde, S.; Macknik, S.L.; Goldinger, S.D. Microsaccades reflect the dynamics of misdirected attention in magic. J. Eye Mov. Res. 2019, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Raffi, M.; Meoni, A.; Piras, A. Analysis of microsaccades during extended practice of a visual discrimination task in the macaque monkey. Neurosci. Lett. 2021, 743, 135581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Piras, A.; Timmis, M.; Trofè, A.; Raffi, M. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of Quiet Eye: The role of microsaccades, small saccades and pupil-size before final movement initiation in a soccer penalty kick. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2021, 21, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Piras, A.; Raffi, M.; Malagoli Lanzoni, I.; Persiani, M.; Squatrito, S. Microsaccades and prediction of a motor act outcome in a dynamic sport situation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 4520–4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Piras, A.; Raffi, M.; Perazzolo, M.; Malagoli Lanzoni, I.; Squatrito, S. Microsaccades and interest areas during free-viewing sport task. J. Sports Sci. 2019, 37, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, G.; Yang, M.; Yu, P.; Dorris, M.C. Time compression of visual perception around microsaccades. J. Neurophysiol. 2017, 118, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dimigen, O.; Valsecchi, M.; Sommer, W.; Kliegl, R. Human microsaccade-related visual brain responses. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 12321–12331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Piras, A.; Raffi, M.; Persiani, M.; Perazzolo, M.; Squatrito, S. Effect of heading perception on microsaccade dynamics. Behav. Brain Res. 2016, 312, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hsu, T.Y.; Chen, J.T.; Tseng, P.; Wang, C.A. Role of the frontal eye field in human microsaccade responses: A TMS study. Biol. Psychol. 2021, 165, 108202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nanjappa, R.; McPeek, R.M. Microsaccades and attention in a high-acuity visual alignment task. J. Vis. 2021, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Anderson, K.C.; Siegel, R.M. Optic flow selectivity in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area, STPa, of the behaving monkey. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 2681–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Avila, E.; Lakshminarasimhan, K.J.; DeAngelis, G.C.; Angelaki, D.E. Visual and Vestibular Selectivity for Self-Motion in Macaque Posterior Parietal Area 7a. Cereb Cortex 2019, 29, 3932–3947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ben Hamed, S.; Page, W.; Duffy, C.; Pouget, A. MSTd neuronal basis functions for the population encoding of heading direction. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 90, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bremmer, F.; Duhamel, J.-R.; Ben Hamed, S.; Graf, W. Heading encoding in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP). Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 16, 1554–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Duffy, C.J.; Wurtz, R.H. Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large field stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 1991, 65, 1329–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Duffy, C.J.; Wurtz, R.H. Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. II. Mechanism of response selectivity revealed by small-field stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 1991, 65, 1346–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Raffi, M.; Carrozzini, C.; Maioli, M.G.; Squatrito, S. Multimodal representation of optic flow in area PEc of macaque monkey. Neuroscience 2010, 171, 1241–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Raffi, M.; Maioli, M.G.; Squatrito, S. Optic flow direction coding in area PEc of the behaving monkey. Neuroscience 2011, 194, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Raffi, M.; Persiani, M.; Piras, A.; Squatrito, S. Optic flow neurons in area PEc integrate eye and head position signals. Neurosci. Lett. 2014, 568, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Raffi, M.; Siegel, R.M. A functional architecture of optic flow in the inferior parietal lobule of the behaving monkey. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Read, H.L.; Siegel, R.M. Modulation of responses to optic flow in area 7a by retinotopic and oculomotor cues in monkeys. Cereb Cortex 1997, 7, 647–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Wylie, D.R.W.; Glover, R.G.; Aitchison, J.D. Optic flow input to the hippocampal formation from the accessory optic system. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 5514–5527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, T.; Heuer, H.W.; Britten, K.H. Parietal area VIP neuronal responses to heading stimuli are encoded in head-centered coordinates. Neuron 2004, 42, 993–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Strong, S.L.; Silson, E.H.; Gouws, A.D.; Morland, A.B.; McKeefry, D.J. Differential processing of the direction and focus of expansion of optic flow stimuli in areas MST and V3A of the human visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2017, 117, 2209–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Smith, A.T.; Wall, M.B.; Williams, A.L.; Singh, K.D. Sensitivity to optic flow in human cortical areas MT and MST. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 23, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hoppes, C.W.; Sparto, P.J.; Whitney, S.L.; Furman, J.M.; Huppert, T.J. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy during optic flow with and without fixation. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Duffy, C.J.; Wurtz, R.H. Medial superior temporal area neurons respond to speed patterns in optic flow. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17, 2839–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Phinney, R.E.; Siegel, R.M. Speed selectivity for optic flow in area 7a of the behaving macaque. Cereb Cortex 2000, 10, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kountouriotis, G.K.; Mole, C.D.; Merat, N.; Wilkie, R.M. The need for speed: Global optic flow speed influences steering. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2016, 3, 160096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Durgin, F.H.; Gigone, K. Enhanced optic flow speed discrimination while walking: Contextual tuning of visual coding. Perception 2007, 36, 1465–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Prokop, T.; Schubert, M.; Berger, W. Visual influence on human locomotion: Modulation to changes in optic flow. Exp. Brain Res. 1997, 114, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Schubert, M.; Prokop, T.; Brocke, F.; Berger, W. Visual kinesthesia and locomotion in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2005, 20, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Raffi, M.; Piras, A.; Persiani, M.; Perazzolo, M.; Squatrito, S. Angle of gaze and optic flow direction modulate body sway. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2017, 35, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zadra, J.R.; Proffitt, D.R. Optic flow is calibrated to walking effort. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2016, 23, 1491–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Bruggeman, H.; Zosh, W.; Warren, W.H. Optic flow drives human visuo-locomotor adaptation. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17, 2035–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Salinas, M.M.; Wilken, J.M.; Dingwell, J.B. How humans use visual optic flow to regulate stepping during walking. Gait Posture 2017, 57, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Warren, W.H.; Kay, B.A.; Zosh, W.D.; Duchon, A.P.; Sahuc, S. Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Beauchamp, M.S.; Petit, L.; Ellmore, T.M.; Ingeholm, J.; Haxby, J.V. A parametric fMRI study of overt and covert shifts of visuospatial attention. Neuroimage 2001, 14, 310–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Boyer, T.W.; Wang, M. Direct gaze, eye movements, and covert and overt social attention processes. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2018, 80, 1654–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Flechsenhar, A.; Larson, O.; End, A.; Gamer, M. Investigating overt and covert shifts of attention within social naturalistic scenes. J. Vis. 2018, 18, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Engbert, R.; Kliegl, R. Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vis. Res. 2003, 43, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Hafed, Z.M.; Clark, J. Microsaccades as an overt measure of covert attention shifts. Vis. Res. 2002, 42, 2533–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Elias, L.J.; Bryden, M.P.; Bulman-Fleming, M.B. Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Levin, H.S.; High, W.M.; Williams, D.H.; Eisenberg, H.M.; Amparo, E.G.; Guinto, F.C.; Ewert, J. Dichotic listening and manual performance in relation to magnetic resonance imaging after closed head injury. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1989, 52, 1162–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Raffi, M.; Piras, A.; Persiani, M.; Squatrito, S. Importance of optic flow for postural stability of male and female young adults. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2014, 114, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zuber, B.L.; Semmlow, J.L.; Stark, L. Frequency characteristics of the saccadic eye movement. Biophys. J. 1968, 8, 1288–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Otero-Millan, J.; Castro, J.L.; Macknik, S.L.; Martinez-Conde, S. Unsupervised clustering method to detect microsaccades. J. Vis. 2014, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Raffi, M.; Trofè, A.; Perazzolo, M.; Meoni, A.; Piras, A. Sensory Input Modulates Microsaccades during Heading Perception. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Troncoso, X.G.; Macknik, S.L.; Martinez-Conde, S. Microsaccades counteract perceptual filling-in. J. Vis. 2008, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Dalmaso, M.; Castelli, L.; Scatturin, P.; Galfano, G. Working memory load modulates microsaccadic rate. J. Vis. 2017, 17, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Hermens, F.; Zanker, J.M.; Walker, R. Microsaccades and preparatory set: A comparison between delayed and immediate, exogenous and endogenous pro- and anti-saccades. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 201, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Watanabe, M.; Matsuo, Y.; Zha, L.; Munoz, D.P.; Kobayashi, Y. Fixational saccades reflect volitional action preparation. J. Neurophysiol. 2013, 110, 522–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Xue, L.; Huang, D.; Wang, T.; Hu, Q.; Chai, X.; Li, L.; Chen, Y. Dynamic modulation of the perceptual load on microsaccades during a selective spatial attention task. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Siegenthaler, E.; Costela, F.M.; McCamy, M.B.; Di Stasi, L.L.; Otero-Millan, J.; Sonderegger, A.; Groner, R.; Macknik, S.; Martinez-Conde, S. Task difficulty in mental arithmetic affects microsaccadic rates and magnitudes. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2014, 39, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gao, X.; Yan, H.; Sun, H.J. Modulation of microsaccade rate by task difficulty revealed through between- and within-trial comparisons. J. Vis. 2015, 15, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Valsecchi, M.; Betta, E.; Turatto, M. Visual oddballs induce prolonged microsaccadic inhibition. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 177, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Valsecchi, M.; Turatto, M. Microsaccadic responses in a bimodal oddball task. Psychol. Res. 2009, 73, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Betta, E.; Turatto, M. Are you ready? I can tell by looking at your microsaccades. NeuroReport 2006, 17, 1001–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Raffi, M.; Piras, A. Investigating the crucial role of optic flow in postural control: Central vs. peripheral visual field. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Laubrock, J.; Engbert, R.; Kliegl, R. Microsaccade dynamics during covert attention. Vis. Res. 2005, 45, 721–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Laubrock, J.; Engbert, K.; Kliegl, R. Fixational eye movements predict the perceived direction of ambiguous apparent motion. J. Vis. 2008, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Quinn, N.; Csincsik, L.; Flynn, E.; Curcio, C.A.; Kiss, S.; Sadda, S.R.; Hogg, R.; Peto, T.; Lengyel, I. The clinical relevance of visualising the peripheral retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 2019, 68, 83–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hafed, Z.M.; Chen, C.Y.; Tian, X. Vision, perception, and attention through the lens of microsaccades: Mechanisms and implications. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Wang, S.; Fukuchi, M.; Koch, C.; Tsuchiya, N. Spatial attention is attracted in a sustained fashion toward singular points in the optic flow. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 19 06765 g001 550
Figure 1. Optic flow and control stimuli. (A) Full field stimulation. (B) Foveal stimulation. (C) Peripheral stimulation. (D) Baseline condition (control). (E) Illustration of the experimental setup. Full, foveal, and peripheral stimuli were presented at different speeds: 8°/s, 11°/s, 14°/s, 17°/s, 20°/s. Arrows represent the velocity vectors of moving dots.
Figure 1. Optic flow and control stimuli. (A) Full field stimulation. (B) Foveal stimulation. (C) Peripheral stimulation. (D) Baseline condition (control). (E) Illustration of the experimental setup. Full, foveal, and peripheral stimuli were presented at different speeds: 8°/s, 11°/s, 14°/s, 17°/s, 20°/s. Arrows represent the velocity vectors of moving dots.
Ijerph 19 06765 g001
Ijerph 19 06765 g002 550
Figure 2. Frequency histograms of microsaccades peak velocity in all stimuli. Grey histograms represent optic flow stimuli, black histogram represents baseline. Data are reported as mean ± SE.
Figure 2. Frequency histograms of microsaccades peak velocity in all stimuli. Grey histograms represent optic flow stimuli, black histogram represents baseline. Data are reported as mean ± SE.
Ijerph 19 06765 g002
Ijerph 19 06765 g003 550
Figure 3. Frequency histograms of averaged microsaccade latency in all conditions. Black: baseline; light grey: speed 8°/s; dark grey: speed 11°/s; white: speed 14°/s; dashed lines: speed 17°/s; dotted lines: speed 20°/s; FO: fovea; FU: full field; P: periphery. Data are reported as mean ± SE.
Figure 3. Frequency histograms of averaged microsaccade latency in all conditions. Black: baseline; light grey: speed 8°/s; dark grey: speed 11°/s; white: speed 14°/s; dashed lines: speed 17°/s; dotted lines: speed 20°/s; FO: fovea; FU: full field; P: periphery. Data are reported as mean ± SE.
Ijerph 19 06765 g003
Ijerph 19 06765 g004 550
Figure 4. Frequency histograms of microsaccade rate in all conditions. Black: baseline; light grey: speed 8°/s; dark grey: speed 11°/s; white: speed 14°/s; dashed lines: speed 17°/s; dotted lines: speed 20°/s; FO: fovea; FU: full field; P: periphery. Data are reported as mean ± SE.
Figure 4. Frequency histograms of microsaccade rate in all conditions. Black: baseline; light grey: speed 8°/s; dark grey: speed 11°/s; white: speed 14°/s; dashed lines: speed 17°/s; dotted lines: speed 20°/s; FO: fovea; FU: full field; P: periphery. Data are reported as mean ± SE.
Ijerph 19 06765 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Raffi, M.; Trofè, A.; Meoni, A.; Gallelli, L.; Piras, A. Optic Flow Speed and Retinal Stimulation Influence Microsaccades. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6765. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116765

AMA Style

Raffi M, Trofè A, Meoni A, Gallelli L, Piras A. Optic Flow Speed and Retinal Stimulation Influence Microsaccades. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(11):6765. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116765

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raffi, Milena, Aurelio Trofè, Andrea Meoni, Luca Gallelli, and Alessandro Piras. 2022. "Optic Flow Speed and Retinal Stimulation Influence Microsaccades" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 11: 6765. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116765

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop