The Effect of Antecedents of Teachers’ Subjective Career Success
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Career Commitment (CC) and Subjective Career Success (SCS)
1.2. Professional Commitment (PC) and Subjective Career Success (SCS)
1.3. Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Subjective Career Success (SCS)
1.4. Perceived Organizational Support (POS) and Subjective Career Success (SCS)
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Research Design
2.2. Participants
2.3. Research Variables and Instruments
2.4. Procedure and Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Career Commitment and Subjective Career Success
4.2. Professional Commitment and Subjective Career Success (SCS)
4.3. Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Subjective Career Success
4.4. Perceived Organizational Support (POS) and Subjective Career Success (SCS)
4.5. Practical Implication
4.6. Limitation and Novelty
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Anoraga, P. Psikologi Kerja; Rineka Cipta: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Judge, T.A.; Cable, D.M.; Boudreau, J.W. An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Pers. Psychol. 1995, 48, 485–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heslin, P. Conceptualizing and evaluating career success. J. Organ. Behav. 2005, 26, 113–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akmal, S.Z.; Arlinkasari, F.; Andryani, I. Perbedaan kesuksesan karir subjektif berdasarkan tipe orientasi karir pada karyawan middle level career di Jakarta. MEDIAPSI 2017, 2, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fresko, B.; Kfir, D.; Nasser, F. Predicting teacher commitment. Teach. Teach. Educ. 1997, 13, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diener, E.; Biswas-Diener, R. Will money increase subjective well-being? Soc. Indic. Res. 2002, 57, 119–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, D.T. A theoretical model of career subidentity development in organizational settings. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1971, 6, 50–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carson, K.D.; Bodeian, A.G. Career commitment: Construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. J. Vocat. Behav. 1994, 44, 237–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, N.O.A. Career commitment: The role of self-efficacy, career satisfaction and organizational commitment. World J. Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, P.; Garg, P. Learning organization and work engagement: The mediating role of employee resilience. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 31, 1071–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koekemoer, E.; Fourie, H.L.R.; Jorgensen, L.I. Exploring subjective career success among blue-collar workers: Motivators that matter. J. Career Dev. 2019, 46, 314–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alford, W.A. Effects of Leader–Member Exchange and Public Service Motivation on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in a Public Workforce Sample. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Leadership Studies, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Sujatha, S.; Seema, A. Perceived organizational support on career success: An employee perspective—An empirical study from an Indian context. Middle East J. Manag. 2017, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasjudi, N. Pengaruh persepsi dukungan organisasi dan kepribadian terhadap kepuasan kerja guru sd islam al azhar di jakarta timur. J. Manaj. Pendidik. 2015, 6, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cicek, I.; Karaboga, T.; Sehitoglu, Y. A new antecedent of career commitment: Work to family positive enhancement. J. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 229, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultana, R.; Yousaf, A.; Khan, I.; Saeed, A. Probing the Interactive Effects of Career Commitment and Emotional Intelligence on Perceived Objective/Subjective Career Success. Pers. Rev. 2016, 45, 724–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathardikar, A.D.; Sahu, S.; Jaiswal, N.K. Assessing organizational ethics and career satisfaction through career commitment. South Asian J. Glob. Bus. Res. 2016, 5, 104–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Beehr, T.A. Directing our own careers, but getting help from empowering leaders. Career Dev. Int. 2017, 22, 300–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakshmi, P.A.V.; Sumaryono, S. Kesuksesan karier ditinjau dari persepsi pengembangan karier dan komitmen karier pada pekerja millennial. Gadjah Mada J. Psychol. 2019, 4, 57–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mela, N.F.; Zarefar, A. The relationship of professional commitment of auditing student and anticipatory socialization toward whistleblowing intention. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 219, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, S.E.; Whitecotton, S.M. An examination of auditors’ reporting intentions when another auditor is offered client employment. Audit. J. Pract. Theory 2001, 20, 45–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yarbrough, S.; Martin, P.; Alfred, D.; McNeill, C. Professional values, job satisfaction, career development, and intent to stay. Nurs. Ethics 2016, 24, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kantek, F.; Kaya, A.; Gezer, N. The effects of nursing education on professional values: A longitudinal study. Nurse Educ. Today 2017, 58, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorenkamp, I.; Ruhle, S. Work-life conflict, professional commitment, and job satisfaction among academics. J. High. Educ. 2019, 90, 56–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasanti, N. The role of work life quality towards teacher’s professional commitment. In Advance in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research; Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.; Xie, B.; Xin, X. A meta-analysis: Human capital, social capital and psychological capital affect county employees’ career success. Acta Psychol. Sin. 2016, 2, 251–263. [Google Scholar]
- Delima, V.T. Professional identity, professional commitment and teacher’s performance. Int. J. Nov. Res. Educ. Learn. 2015, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Mansor, A.Z. Developing quality-conscious professionals through the basics of quality management course: Students expectations. Eur. J. Mol. Clin. Med. 2020, 7, 876–884. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, H.Y.; Chu, T.L. How do career barriers and supports impact nurse professional commitment and professional turnover intention? J. Nurs. Manag. 2018, 27, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, H.Y.; Shyu, R.L. Which aspects of professional commitment can effectively retain nurse in the nursing profession? J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2015, 47, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sparrowe, R.T.; Liden, R.C. Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1997, 22, 522–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermeulen, M.; Kreijns, K.; Evers, A.T. Transformational leadership, leader–member exchange and school learning climate: Impact on teachers’ innovative behaviour in the Netherlands. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 2020, 50, 491–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liden, R.C.; Maslyn, J.M. Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. J. Manag. 1998, 24, 43–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wayne, S.J.; Liden, R.C.; Sparrowe, R.T. Developing leader-member exchanges: The influence of gender and ingratiation. Am. Behav. Sci. 1994, 37, 697–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, Z.S.; Dik, B.J.; Chiaburu, D.S. Alternatives to traditional mentoring in fostering career success. J. Vocat. Behav. 2008, 72, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhoades, L.; Eisenberger, R. Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 698–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, C. Chinese knowledge employees’ career values, perceived organizational support and career success. iBusiness 2011, 3, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wickramaratne, W.P.R. Role of career oriented perceived organizational support in determining subjective career success of supervisory level managers in manufacturing firms. EMAJ Emerg. Mark. J. 2021, 11, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D; Alfabeta, CV: Bandung, Indonesia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ingarianti, T.M.; Purwono, U. Adaptasi instrumen komitmen karier. J. Psikol. Undip 2019, 18, 199–217. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, J.P.; Allen, N.J.; Smith, C.A. Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. J. Appl. Psychol. 1993, 78, 538–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, D.; Hall, M. An empirical examination of a three-component model of professional commitment among public accountants. Behav. Res. Account. 2008, 20, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenberger, R.; Huntington, R.; Hutchison, S.; Sowa, D. Perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 1986, 71, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenberger, R.; Rhoades Shanock, L.; Wen, X.; ARjatscls, E. Perceived organizational support: Why caring about employees counts. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2019, 7, 101–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shockley, K.M.; Ureksoy, H.; Rodopman, O.B.; Poteat, L.F.; Dullaghan, T.R. Development of a new scale to measure subjective career success: A mixed-methods study. J. Organ. Behav. 2016, 37, 128–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ingarianti, T.M.; Suhariadi, F.; Fajrianthi, F. Adaptasi Alat Ukur Kesuksesan Karier Subjektif. J. Ilm. Psikol. Terap. Univ. Muhammadiyah Malang 2022, 10, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lourenção, L.G.; de Oliveira, J.F.; Ximenes Neto, F.R.G.; Cunha, C.L.F.; Valenzuela-Suazo, S.V.; Borges, M.A.; Gazetta, C.E. Career commitment and career entrenchment among primary health care workers. Rev. Bras. Enferm. 2021, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Herachwati, N.; Rachma, A. Organizational commitment versus career commitment. In KnE Social Sciences; Knowledge E: Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Mahendra, V.P.S. Pengaruh komitmen karir dan motivasi karir terhadap kesuksesan karir subjektif karyawan pada PT bank BTN Bekasi. J. Manaj. 2017, 14, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srikanth, P.B.; Israel, D. Career commitment & career success: Mediating role of career satisfaction. Indian J. Ind. Relat. 2012, 48, 137–149. [Google Scholar]
- Pasha, A.T.; Hamid, K.A.; Shahzad, A. Mediating role of career commitment in the relationship of promotional opportunities, rewards and career success. Pak. J. Stat. Oper. Res. 2017, 13, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.W.; Sun, T. The impact of quality of work life on job embeddedness and affective commitment and their co-effect on turnover intention of nurses. J. Clin. Nurs. 2013, 22, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, K.; Nemati, A.R. Impact of job involvement on employee satisfaction: A study based on medical doctors working at Riphah International University Teaching Hospitals in Pakistan. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2011, 5, 2241–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, H.; Khalid, I. Commitment with the Teaching Profession: Demographical View of Teacher Educators. Pak. J. Educ. 2017, 34, 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, V.; Huang, X. Professional commitment, organizational commitment, and the intention to leave for professional advancement: An empirical study on IT professionals. J. Inf. Technol. People 2012, 25, 31–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chow, T.B. Medical Doctors of the People’s Republic of China: The Profession, Professionalization, Professionalism and Professional Commitment. Master’s Thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Breevaart, K.; Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E.; Van Den Heuvel, M. Leader-member exchange, work engagement, and job performance. J. Manag. Psychol. 2015, 30, 154–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leow, K.L.; Khong, K.W. Organizational commitment: The study of organizational justice and leader-member exchange (LMX) among auditors in Malaysia. Int. J. Bus. Inf. 2015, 4, 161–193. [Google Scholar]
- Boehm, J.K.; Lyubomirsky, S. Does happiness promote career success? J. Career Assess. 2018, 16, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. Towards a model of work engagement. Emerald Insight 2013, 13, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wayne, S.J.; Shore, L.M.; Bommer, W.H.; Tetrick, L.E. The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational the role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader–member exchange. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, S.T.; Nugroho, A.; Kartika, E.W.; Kaihatu, T.S. Komitmen afektif dalam organisasi yang dipengaruhi perceived organizational support dan kepuasan kerja. J. Manaj. Dan Kewirausahaan 2012, 14, 91–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puspitasari, K.A.; Ratningsih, I.Z. Hubungan antara perceived organizational support dengan work-life balance pada karyawan pt. bpr kusuma sumbing di jawa tengah. J. Empati 2019, 8, 82–86. [Google Scholar]
- Sugiarti, R.; Suhariadi, F.; Erlangga, E. The chance of gifted intelligent students’ success in career. Indian J. Public Health Res. Dev. 2018, 9, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Category | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 106 | 33.1% |
Female | 214 | 66.9% |
Domicile | ||
Java | 280 | 87.5% |
Non-Java | 40 | 12.5% |
Educational Background | ||
Associate Degree/4-Year Diploma | 6 | 1.9% |
Bachelor Degree | 295 | 92.2% |
Master Degree | 19 | 5.9% |
Employment Status | ||
Civil State Apparatus Teacher | 150 | 46.9% |
Organizational Permanent Teacher | 89 | 27.8% |
Contract Teacher | 81 | 25.3% |
Work Unit | ||
Kindergarten | 31 | 9.7% |
Elementary School | 62 | 19.4% |
Junior High School | 108 | 33.8% |
Senior/Vocational High School | 119 | 37.2% |
Length of Service | ||
Less than 10 years | 100 | 31.2% |
10–15 years | 73 | 22.8% |
More than 15 years | 147 | 45.9% |
Educator Certificate | ||
Have | 218 | 68.1% |
Do not have | 102 | 31.9% |
Income | ||
Less than IDR 5 million | 249 | 77.8% |
More than IDR 5 million | 71 | 22.2% |
Variable Relationship | R Square | ANOVA Sig. | Coefficient | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Β | Sig. | |||
CI → R | 0.217 | 0.000 | 0.339 | 0.000 |
CP → R | 0.217 | 0.000 | 0.033 | 0.498 |
CR → R | 0.217 | 0.000 | −0.040 | 0.321 |
CI → QW | 0.105 | 0.000 | 0.297 | 0.000 |
CP → QW | 0.105 | 0.000 | 0.099 | 0.091 |
CR → QW | 0.105 | 0.000 | −0.092 | 0.109 |
CI → MW | 0.142 | 0.000 | 0.329 | 0.000 |
CP → MW | 0.142 | 0.000 | 0.145 | 0.012 |
CR → MW | 0.142 | 0.000 | −0.120 | 0.033 |
CI → I | 0.91 | 0.000 | 0.290 | 0.000 |
CP → I | 0.91 | 0.000 | 0.090 | 0.126 |
CR → I | 0.91 | 0.000 | −0.139 | 0.016 |
CI → A | 0.164 | 0.000 | 0.300 | 0.000 |
CP → A | 0.164 | 0.000 | 0.230 | 0.000 |
CR → A | 0.164 | 0.000 | −0.108 | 0.053 |
CI → PL | 0.61 | 0.000 | 0.243 | 0.000 |
CP → PL | 0.61 | 0.000 | 0.039 | 0.519 |
CR → PL | 0.61 | 0.000 | −0.071 | 0.229 |
CI → GD | 0.175 | 0.000 | 0.307 | 0.000 |
CP → GD | 0.175 | 0.000 | 0.245 | 0.000 |
CR → GD | 0.175 | 0.000 | −0.151 | 0.006 |
CI → S | 0.167 | 0.000 | 0.306 | 0.000 |
CP → S | 0.167 | 0.000 | 0.229 | 0.000 |
CR → S | 0.167 | 0.000 | −0.104 | 0.061 |
Variable Relationship | R Square | ANOVA Sig. | Coefficient | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Β | Sig. | |||
APC R | 0.118 | 0.000 | 0.112 | 0.089 |
CPC R | 0.118 | 0.000 | 0.086 | 0.138 |
NPC R | 0.118 | 0.000 | 0.223 | 0.002 |
APC QW | 0.124 | 0.000 | 0.179 | 0.007 |
CPC QW | 0.124 | 0.000 | 0.088 | 0.129 |
NPC QW | 0.124 | 0.000 | 0.174 | 0.014 |
APC MW | 0.165 | 0.000 | 0.213 | 0.001 |
CPC MW | 0.165 | 0.000 | 0.035 | 0.532 |
NPC MW | 0.165 | 0.000 | 0.228 | 0.001 |
APC I | 0.100 | 0.000 | 0.078 | 0.241 |
CPC I | 0.100 | 0.000 | 0.134 | 0.022 |
NPC I | 0.100 | 0.000 | 0.187 | 0.009 |
APC A | 0.209 | 0.000 | 0.298 | 0.000 |
CPC A | 0.209 | 0.000 | 0.074 | 0.179 |
NPC A | 0.209 | 0.000 | 0.181 | 0.007 |
APC PL | 0.063 | 0.000 | 0.110 | 0.106 |
CPC PL | 0.063 | 0.000 | 0.023 | 0.698 |
NPC PL | 0.063 | 0.000 | 0.160 | 0.029 |
APC GD | 0.159 | 0.000 | 0.308 | 0.000 |
CPC GD | 0.159 | 0.000 | 0.122 | 0.031 |
NPC GD | 0.159 | 0.000 | 0.070 | 0.310 |
APC S | 0.118 | 0.000 | 0.264 | 0.000 |
CPC S | 0.118 | 0.000 | 0.077 | 0.181 |
NPC S | 0.118 | 0.000 | 0.079 | 0.268 |
Variable Relationship | R Square | ANOVA Sig. | Coefficient | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Β | Sig. | |||
CON → R | 0.125 | <0.001 | 0.296 | <0.001 |
LOY → R | 0.125 | <0.001 | 0.035 | 0.565 |
AFF → R | 0.125 | <0.001 | 0.171 | 0.004 |
PC → R | 0.125 | <0.001 | −0.092 | 0.227 |
CON → QW | 0.142 | <0.001 | 0.117 | 0.119 |
LOY → QW | 0.142 | <0.001 | 0.089 | 0.146 |
AFF → QW | 0.142 | <0.001 | 0.270 | <0.001 |
PC → QW | 0.142 | <0.001 | 8.520 | 0.991 |
CON → MW | 0.095 | <0.001 | 0.099 | 0.198 |
LOY → MW | 0.095 | <0.001 | −0.062 | 0.323 |
AFF → MW | 0.095 | <0.001 | 0.247 | <0.001 |
PC → MW | 0.095 | <0.001 | 0.048 | 0.533 |
CON → I | 0.154 | <0.001 | 0.139 | 0.061 |
LOY → I | 0.154 | <0.001 | 0.156 | 0.011 |
AFF → I | 0.154 | <0.001 | 0.282 | <0.001 |
PC → I | 0.154 | <0.001 | −0.093 | 0.211 |
CON → A | 0.089 | <0.001 | 0.048 | 0.530 |
LOY → A | 0.089 | <0.001 | −0.098 | 0.120 |
AFF → A | 0.089 | <0.001 | 0.178 | 0.004 |
PC → A | 0.089 | <0.001 | 0.171 | 0.028 |
CON → PL | 0.050 | 0.003 | 0.057 | 0.468 |
LOY → PL | 0.050 | 0.003 | 0.055 | 0.395 |
AFF → PL | 0.050 | 0.003 | 0.146 | 0.019 |
PC → PL | 0.050 | 0.003 | 0.30 | 0.701 |
CON → GD | 0.105 | <0.001 | 0.062 | 0.421 |
LOY → GD | 0.105 | <0.001 | 0.008 | 0.904 |
AFF → GD | 0.105 | <0.001 | 0.266 | <0.001 |
PC → GD | 0.105 | <0.001 | 0.044 | 0.568 |
CON → S | 0.094 | <0.001 | 0.105 | 0.171 |
LOY → S | 0.094 | <0.001 | 0.015 | 0.816 |
AFF → S | 0.094 | <0.001 | 0.214 | <0.001 |
PC → S | 0.094 | <0.001 | 0.044 | 0.571 |
Variable Relationship | R Square | ANOVA Sig. | Coefficient | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Β | Sig. | |||
POS → R | 0.214 | 0.000 | 0.463 | 0.000 |
POS → QW | 0.181 | 0.000 | 0.426 | 0.000 |
POS → MW | 0.132 | 0.000 | 0.364 | 0.000 |
POS → I | 0.224 | 0.000 | 0.473 | 0.000 |
POS → A | 0.114 | 0.000 | 0.337 | 0.000 |
POS → PL | 0.093 | 0.000 | 0.305 | 0.000 |
POS → GD | 0.130 | 0.000 | 0.361 | 0.000 |
POS → S | 0.125 | 0.000 | 0.353 | 0.000 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ingarianti, T.M.; Suhariadi, F.; Fajrianthi, F.; Kristiana, I.F. The Effect of Antecedents of Teachers’ Subjective Career Success. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711121
Ingarianti TM, Suhariadi F, Fajrianthi F, Kristiana IF. The Effect of Antecedents of Teachers’ Subjective Career Success. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(17):11121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711121
Chicago/Turabian StyleIngarianti, Tri Muji, Fendy Suhariadi, Fajrianthi Fajrianthi, and Ika Febrian Kristiana. 2022. "The Effect of Antecedents of Teachers’ Subjective Career Success" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 17: 11121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711121
APA StyleIngarianti, T. M., Suhariadi, F., Fajrianthi, F., & Kristiana, I. F. (2022). The Effect of Antecedents of Teachers’ Subjective Career Success. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 11121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711121