Next Article in Journal
Validation of StepTest4all for Assessing Cardiovascular Capacity in Young Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Does Water Matter? The Impact of Water Vulnerability on Corporate Financial Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Environmentally Just Futures: A Collection of Community-Driven African Environmental Education and Improvement Initiatives
 
 
Commentary
Peer-Review Record

Harmonization of Epidemiologic Research Methods to Address the Environmental and Social Determinants of Urban Slum Health Challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11273; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811273
by Adetoun Mustapha 1,*, A. Kofi Amegah 2 and Eric Stephen Coker 3
Reviewer 1:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11273; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811273
Submission received: 14 June 2022 / Revised: 21 August 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 8 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ISEE Commentaries)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Manuscript ID: ijerph-1794273

Title: Harmonization of Epidemiologic Research Methods to Address the Environmental and Social Determinants of Urban Slum Health Challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa

The authors of the reviewed commentary presented the finding of the recent environmental health studies from urban cities in East and West Africa, presented during a symposium sponsored by the Africa Chapter 13 of the International Society of Environmental Epidemiology (ISEE) in August 2020. The topic is significant and very well-articulated; however, I have the following concerns: 

 

  1. The authors claim that this commentary outcome is to galvanize environmental epidemiologists in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) around shared data collection instruments and shared data platforms and facilitate the pooling of data across the continent. However, this statement needs more emphasis on the applicability of this suggestion. I would appreciate it if the authors could expand on this in improving air pollution exposure assessment in resource-constrained contexts.
  2. Add a Reflections and Future work section.
  3. Mention, under the Reflection section, how this work would filter through to government policy and a wider collective action.

Author Response

Thanks for your useful comments. The paper have been revised to reflect the comments. Please find the details in the attached document.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

See comments attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks for your useful comments. They have been reflected in the revised manuscripts as much as possible. Please find the details in the attached,

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I am satisfied with the way comments were addressed and I recommend this paper for publication.

The authors should just ensure that References are following the Journal Style in their final version for publication as there are lot of inconsistencies in this current version.

 

Back to TopTop