Next Article in Journal
Eliciting a User’s Preferences by the Self-Disclosure of Socially Assistive Robots in Local Households of Older Adults to Facilitate Verbal Human–Robot Interaction
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Association between Streetscapes and Mental Health in Zhanjiang, China: Using Baidu Street View Images and Deep Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Storyboarding HIV Infected Young People’s Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in Lower- to Upper Middle-Income Countries: A New-Materialist Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of the Gain-Loss Frame on College Students’ Willingness to Participate in the Individual Low-Carbon Behavior Rewarding System (ILBRS): The Mediating Role of Environmental Risk Perception
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Spatial-Temporal Pattern Evolution of Public Sentiment Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Small Cities of China: A Case Study Based on Social Media Data Analysis

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11306; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811306
by Yuye Zhou, Jiangang Xu *, Maosen Yin, Jun Zeng, Haolin Ming and Yiwen Wang
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11306; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811306
Submission received: 31 July 2022 / Revised: 3 September 2022 / Accepted: 5 September 2022 / Published: 8 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Plan and Environmental Policy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article is interesting; however, in the reviewer's opinion, it is worth comparing the results obtained in the authors' study with analogous studies for other cities/countries.

It would also be advisable to describe more extensively the selection of source data - especially the number of diagnosed COVID-19 cases. To what extent is the selection of data by the method described representative?

Author Response

Thanks for your comments and suggestions! Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

It is another article about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on public mental health. Many authors have studied it. 

However, it should be noted that the reviewed text innovatively explores the spatial-temporal characteristics of public sentiment responses to COVID-19 exposure to improve urban anti-pandemic decision-making and public health resilience. It uses modern research methods such as Local Moran's I, kernel density analysis, 17 Getis-Ord Gi* and standard deviation ellipse.

Paper is well organized. Abstract reflects the article content. Introduction presents state of knowledge and the objective of the research. Paper presents the research methodology, result and discussion. The author carefully presents results of the research and analysis. At the end author presents conclusions and references. 

For the article I report the following miner comments:
- lines 11-12, I can not agree with the statement “…as most recent studies have focused on the macro scale or large cities, there is a lack of fine research at the small city scale”. For example, please see the article: Majewska A. et al., 2022, Pandemic resilient cities: Possibilities of repairing Polish towns and cities during COVID-19 pandemic. Land Use Policy 113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105904

-Figure 6a), word cloud map of pandemic-related microblogs in Shaoxing should be translated to English

-Figures 4-5 and 7 - legends are not very readable, to be corrected

-lines 341-342 Table 2 title should be moved to the next page

Author Response

Thanks for your comments and suggestions! Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

It is an inspiring and meaningful article.  I have only a few recommendations for the authors to consider.  They include:

1. Even though the authors propose a pandemic-cognition-sentiment conceptual framework for the study, the authors do not specify the expected results.  It is not easy for me to relate the results to the framework.

2. The methodology is very inspiring.  The authors should propose any further application of the method.

 

 

Author Response

Thanks for your comments and suggestions! Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop