Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Working from Home on Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study of Canadian Worker’s Mental Health during the Third Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Next Article in Special Issue
The Spatial Effect of Air Pollution Governance on Labor Productivity: Evidence from 262 Chinese Cities
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Cadherin 12 (CDH12) in the Peritoneal Fluid among Patients with Endometriosis and Endometriosis-Related Infertility
Previous Article in Special Issue
Indoor Air Quality in Tujia Dwellings in Hunan, China: Field Tests, Numerical Simulations, and Mitigation Strategies
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Long-Term Effects of Ambient Particulate and Gaseous Pollutants on Serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study Using KoGES-HEXA Data

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11585; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811585
by Ji Hyun Kim, Hae Dong Woo, Sunho Choi, Dae Sub Song, Jung Hyun Lee and Kyoungho Lee *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11585; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811585
Submission received: 12 July 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 7 September 2022 / Published: 14 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in Air Pollution and Human Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. Excepted for ambient air pollutants, CRP maybe associated with many other factors and this has been reported also in Table 1.  So how to control the confoundings is key to the effects of air pollutants on CRP. However, only univariate analyses were shown in the manuscripts. 

2. Either multiple linear regression or logistic regression has colinearity rules. As shown in the results, PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2 were correlated significantly. So it's unreasonable to use these correlated pollutants as predictors in the same model. The sensitivity analyses are questionable.

3. As to the main model in the supplementary results, BMI maybe correlated with blood pressure... The main model are also questionable.  In addition,  multivariate analysis has to have a sounding strategy of variates selection.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors, firstly I would like to congratulate you on your document. The paper is interesting, original, clear, and well written, and I have added some suggestions to improve the overall quality of the document:

In the abstract section, please consider including the information that the odds ratio reported is indicative that the exposure might be a risk factor for the condition, however, it does not reflect a strong association.

In the results section, table 1, I found it difficult to understand the value of 2,001 (67.8) related to age, or 950 (32.2). I strongly suggest you make it clear what the values indicate and the units of measurement for each variable. For clarity, where is it possible to see, in table 1, that 67% of the participants were female?

 

In figures 2 and 3, please consider having the legend for the figure before the abbreviation meaning description.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This manuscript presents a study on associations of long-term air pollution exposure on serum hs-CRP, adopting data from a Korean study. Although the associations between air pollution and CRP have been investigated previously, this study provide an interesting topic on the multiple measurement and long-term exposure-response relationship in Asian population. However, some issues should be considered. 

 1. Please provide the methodology for exposure assessment in detail. Although the CMAQ provided R2 values 0.81 for PM10 and 0.64 for PM2.5, the values of other concentration of gaseous pollutants (SO2, NO2, and O3) was no found. What’s the impact of exposure error on health effect estimation?

 2. A set of individual-level covariates were adjusted in the model. Blood levels of white blood cells, fibrinogen, triglycerides, and fasting blood glucose were positively associated with PMs, SO2, and NO2, and inversely associated with O3 (Page 12, Lines 366-369). Did you consider the confounding effects of some important clinical parameters, such as glucose, blood lipid, cholesterol and triglycerides?

 3. A discussion on the potential impacts of independent effects of pollutants and whether the chronic effect was attenuated by the acute effect (Page 5, Lines 175-179) is suggested.

 4. The effect modification of drinking status should be presented (Table S2).

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

1. It's widely accepted that PMs are highly associated with NO2 or SO2. It's not appropriate to put these ambient air pollutants in the same linear/logistic regression model. As to the sensitivity analysis, I suggest to use the results of  table a in the author's response.

2. The short-term exposures might have strong confounding effects according to the sensitivity analysis. It's better to add interaction item to the main model.

3. The statistics of medical history in table 1 is questionable. Please check and fix the data.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop