Next Article in Journal
Calcareous Materials Effectively Reduce the Accumulation of Cd in Potatoes in Acidic Cadmium-Contaminated Farmland Soils in Mining Areas
Next Article in Special Issue
Factors Associated with Self-Report of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Adults Seeking Dental Care in a Developing Country
Previous Article in Journal
Embodied Cognition in Meditation, Yoga, and Ethics—An Experimental Single-Case Study on the Differential Effects of Four Mind–Body Treatments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Papillomavirus Infection and Prevention: How Much Does the Sicilian Population Know? An Observational Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Full Arch Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Patients with Type I Diabetes Mellitus: Retrospective Clinical Study with 10 Year Follow-Up

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11735; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811735
by Bianca D’Orto 1,2, Elisabetta Polizzi 2,3, Matteo Nagni 1,2, Giulia Tetè 1,2 and Paolo Capparè 1,2,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11735; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811735
Submission received: 12 August 2022 / Revised: 5 September 2022 / Accepted: 11 September 2022 / Published: 17 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Oral Health and Chronic Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In the text it is unspecifically described that "Blood tests were prescribed about one month before surgery ".  It would be interesting to understand which lab tests were required.  Has the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin been measured?  Have antigenic tests been performed (ICA, GADA, IA-2A, IAA) to see if the clinicians have also treated forms of type I autoimmune diabetes?

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,
thank you for your reply and request. 
The blood tests requested included evaluation of blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin and antigenic tests (ICA, GADA, IA-2A, IAA). 
We remain at your disposal for any further clarifications and thank you for your courtesy and helpfulness.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors present a retrospective clinical study in which they assess and compare the implant survival, the marginal bone loss and clinical and prosthetic complications in healthy patients and patients with type I diabetes, undergoing full-arch implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. The authors present a well-edited and scientifically consistent research article, in a very relevant area in dentistry. Overall, the manuscript left me with a good impression, and it is an important study in the field of public health in implantology.

Although the study has clinical and scientific implications of enhancement, some corrections should be noted:

In a retrospective study, the formulation of the problem should be equated. It must be introduced a working hypothesis, that must be considered in the discussion and answered in the conclusion.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, 
thank you for your examination and request,
in agreement with your consideration, we have added a specification in the aim of the study. 
We remain at your disposal for further clarification. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop