Next Article in Journal
Understanding Determinants of Pregnant Women’s Knowledge of Lifestyle-Related Risk Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Physical Exercise in People with Chronic Kidney Disease—Practices and Perception of the Knowledge of Health Professionals and Physical Activity and Sport Science Professionals about Their Prescription
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perceived Discrimination at School and Developmental Outcomes among Bai Adolescents: The Mediating Roles of Self-Esteem and Ethnic Identity

Department of Social Work, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(2), 657; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020657
Submission received: 15 November 2021 / Revised: 27 December 2021 / Accepted: 4 January 2022 / Published: 7 January 2022

Abstract

:
Although discrimination is widely acknowledged to impair developmental outcomes among ethnic minority adolescents, literature differentiating discrimination based on personal characteristics and group membership is lacking, especially in Chinese contexts, and the mechanisms of those relationships remain unclear. In response, the study presented here examined whether self-esteem mediates the relationship between perceived academic discrimination and developmental outcomes among such ethnic minority adolescents, and whether ethnic identity mediates the relationship between perceived ethnic discrimination and developmental outcomes. Multistage cluster random sampling performed in Dali and Kunming, China, yielded a sample of 813 Bai adolescents whose data was analysed in structural equation modelling. The results indicate that perceived academic discrimination had a direct negative effect on adolescents’ mental health, while perceived ethnic discrimination had direct negative effects on their behavioural adjustment and social competence. Perceived academic discrimination also indirectly affected adolescents’ behavioural adjustment, mental health, and social competence via self-esteem, whereas perceived ethnic discrimination indirectly affected their behavioural adjustment and social competence via ethnic identity. These findings deepen current understandings of how perceived discrimination, self-esteem, and ethnic identity affect the developmental outcomes of ethnic minority adolescents and provide practical recommendations for policymakers and social workers to promote those outcomes in China.

1. Introduction

Discrimination refers to any behaviour that denies individuals or social groups equal treatment [1,2]. Experiences of discrimination and/or unfair treatment have been characterised as part of everyday life among ethnic minority adolescents [3], especially at school [4,5], where adolescents generally spend a great deal of their time [6]. In turn, their perceived discrimination can contribute to adverse developmental outcomes, including worse mental health, negative behaviours, and weak social competence [7,8,9]. In mainland China, a multi-ethnic nation of 56 officially recognised ethnic groups, including the Han majority group and 55 ethnic minority groups, there are more than 19.9 million ethnic minority adolescents aged 10–20 years old, which accounts for approximately 9.81% of the entire population in that age range [10]. However, studies on the relationships between such adolescents’ perceived discrimination at school and their developmental outcomes have rarely been conducted in mainland China.
As attested in the literature, reasons for being discriminated against can vary widely. Some researchers in Western contexts have classified discrimination into two types: discrimination based on personal characteristics and discrimination based on group membership [11]. Whereas discrimination based on personal characteristics occurs when a person is discriminated due to their personal traits (e.g., age and appearance), discrimination based on group membership occurs on the basis of person’s belonging to a particular social group—for instance, an ethnic group [12]. Nevertheless, studies on the relationship between perceived discrimination and ethnic minority adolescents’ developmental outcomes in mainland China have rarely differentiated discrimination based on personal characteristics from discrimination based on group membership. Thus, given the prevalence of academic discrimination in China [13] and the fact that ethnic discrimination is a unique negative experience for ethnic minorities, it is necessary to empirically investigate their effects as kinds of discrimination based on personal characteristics and group membership, respectively, on the developmental outcomes of ethnic minority adolescents in mainland China.
As suggested by symbolic interactionist theory, self-esteem, meaning one’s feelings of self-worth and self-respect [14], may mediate the relationship between adolescents’ negative experiences and developmental outcomes [15,16,17]. In particular, if adolescents are discriminated against, then they may internalise others’ negative appraisals of them and develop a negative self-concept, which may adversely affect their developmental outcomes. At the same time, social identity theory indicates that ethnic identity, defined as the part of an individual’s self-concept deriving from membership in an ethnic group together with that membership’s value and emotional significance [18,19], may mediate the relationship between ethnic minority adolescents’ ethnic discrimination and developmental outcomes [20]. Despite theories shedding light on the mechanisms of perceived academic discrimination and ethnic discrimination on adolescents’ developmental outcomes, empirical studies testing potential mediators in those relationships (e.g., self-esteem and ethnic identity) have been few, especially among ethnic minority adolescents in mainland China.
Against that background, we sought to narrow those gaps in the literature by examining the direct effect of perceived academic discrimination and ethnic discrimination on developmental outcomes, the potential mediating effect of self-esteem between perceived academic discrimination and those outcomes, and the potential mediating effect of ethnic identity between perceived ethnic discrimination and the outcomes among ethnic minority adolescents in mainland China.

1.1. Perceived Discrimination and Developmental Outcomes

According to Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development [21,22], people experience different life crises and developmental tasks at different stages of life, and successfully resolving those crises results in healthy development. During adolescence, for example, individuals are expected to develop a stable personality, prepare themselves for culturally acceptable adult roles and responsibilities, and learn the mechanisms of interpersonal adult relationships [23,24]. Accordingly, behavioural adjustment and mental health have been widely used to measure adolescents’ developmental outcomes [25,26]. Beyond that, owing to the developmental task of learning the mechanisms of interpersonal relationships, social competence is regarded as a vital dimension of adolescents’ development. For that reason, mental health, behavioural adjustment, and social competence served as indicators of developmental outcomes in our study.
Theoretical studies have validated perceived discrimination’s detrimental effects on the developmental outcomes of ethnic minority adolescents. The integrative model developed by Coll et al. [27] casts valuable light on the relationship between ethnic minority adolescents’ perceived discrimination and their developmental outcomes. Taking an ecological approach, the model stresses that such adolescents’ development should be considered in terms of the environmental practices of racism, prejudice, and discrimination that factor into their development [28,29].
The education system in mainland China regards academic achievement as the primary, if not the sole, criterion for assessing whether adolescents are excellent. As a consequence, students who demonstrate poor academic achievement are more likely to be discriminated against [30]. In turn, academic discrimination among adolescents is negatively associated with their development. In past work, adolescents who had experienced academic discrimination were more likely to have more stress, less self-confidence, and worse mental health [31,32]. In another study, Zu [33] showed that academic discrimination could increase anxiety among students with poor academic achievement, as well as discourage their social interaction. In addition, Jia [34] has suggested that students who have been insulted, devaluated, or threatened because of their academic achievement tend to have higher levels of anxiety and exhibit more aggressive behaviours. Although research has validated perceived academic discrimination’s negative association with adolescents’ development, few empirical studies have investigated that relationship among ethnic minority adolescents, despite their tendency to demonstrate poor academic achievement [35]. In response, our study explored the relationship between perceived academic discrimination and developmental outcomes among ethnic minority adolescents in mainland China.
In the past two decades, multiple empirical studies have validated perceived ethnic discrimination’s negative association with adolescents’ developmental outcomes [36,37]. Discrimination can pose a significant risk to the mental health of ethnic minority adolescents, and experiences of discrimination have been shown to have negative consequences for their psychological functioning, including elevated anxiety, stress, and depressive symptoms [38,39,40], and feelings of loneliness [41]. Experience with discrimination is also a contributing factor to poor behavioural outcomes [42], and in longitudinal research has been prospectively associated with more violent behaviours [43]. Similar findings emerged in the study of McKenney et al. [44], which showed that experiences with ethnic discrimination triggered ethnic minority adolescents’ engagement in aggressive and violent behaviours.
Although studies have addressed the relationship between perceived discrimination and both psychological and behavioural outcomes, very few have addressed the potential relationship between perceived discrimination and social competence. A notable exception is the research conducted by Myrick et al. [36], which revealed that perceived discrimination was negatively related to social competence. Even so, most studies on the relationship between ethnic discrimination and developmental outcomes have been conducted in Western contexts, whereas few researchers have examined such discrimination’s effect on the developmental outcomes of ethnic minority adolescents in mainland China. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the specific relationship between ethnic discrimination and developmental outcomes in that population.

1.2. Self-Esteem and Ethnic Identity

Social identity theory distinguishes personal identity from social identity. Personal identity refers to an individual’s self-concept, which is more personal in nature and usually denotes their specific attributes (e.g., physical features, psychological characteristics, and feelings of self-worth), whereas social identity denotes the part of an individual’s self-concept, which derives from their knowledge of their membership in a social group (or groups) along with the value and emotional significance attached to that membership [18,45]. Although personal identity and social identity are parts of the self, they refer to different, equally authentic levels of self-concept that cannot be reduced to one another [46,47]. After all, people are not only individuals but also members of social groups, and self-concept at the personal and group levels is equally real [48].
Aside from differentiating personal identity from social identity, social identity theory recognises a functional antagonism between those two levels of identity in terms of their salience. It maintains that because the functioning of identity depends upon the situation, particular identities tend to be activated in particular situations [18,47]. Verifying that view, empirical research has shown that discrimination based on personal characteristics is associated with self-concept at the personal level but not ethnic identity, and the reverse is true for ethnic discrimination [48].
Because we examined academic discrimination, which is based on personal characteristics, and ethnic discrimination, which is based on social group, self-concept at both the personal and social levels was examined as well. At the same time, the study also investigated feelings of self-worth as a vital part of personal identity called self-esteem and ethnic identity as a kind of social identity. Considering that particular identities tend to be activated in particular situations, academic discrimination likely relates to self-esteem, whereas ethnic discrimination likely relates to ethnic identity.

1.3. Self-Esteem as a Mediator

According to symbolic interactionist theory, one’s self-concept is primarily established by interacting with other people. Because individuals rely upon feedback from others to establish their self-concept, perceptions of discrimination may convince them to accept others’ negative appraisals of them, and, as a consequence, develop a lower level of self-worth [16,49]. Thus, if adolescents are discriminated against due to their academic performance, then they may internalise others’ negative appraisals or stereotypes and develop low levels of self-esteem, which can affect their developmental outcomes.
Studies have revealed not only the negative relationship between perceived academic discrimination and adolescents’ self-esteem [50,51] but also the associations between self-esteem and adolescents’ developmental outcomes, including behavioural adjustment and mental health [52,53,54]. In particular, adolescents with higher levels of self-esteem have exhibited more prosocial behaviours [55], less risky behaviours [56,57], and less negative psychological outcomes, such as depression [58,59]. Research has additionally highlighted the mediating role of self-esteem between negative experiences (e.g., social exclusion and psychological maltreatment) and developmental outcomes [60,61]—that is, that an individual’s self-esteem positively contributes to their coping with stressors and, in turn, their developmental outcomes. Following that logic, self-esteem may mediate adolescents’ perceived academic discrimination and developmental outcomes. However, to the best of our knowledge, empirical studies have rarely investigated self-esteem’s mediating role in that relationship, especially among ethnic minority adolescents in Chinese contexts.

1.4. Ethnic Identity as a Mediator

Social identity theory may shed light on ethnic identity’s mediating effect in the relationship between perceived ethnic discrimination and developmental outcomes among adolescents. According to the theory, when individuals identify with their social group (e.g., ethnic group), they focus on the group’s positive aspects and are proud of and self-confident about their membership in the group [62,63]. Experiencing discrimination from out-group members only intensifies their identification with their social group, which alleviates some of the harm done to their well-being and developmental outcomes. Therefore, experiencing ethnic discrimination may in fact enhance ethnic identity, and, in turn, decrease its negative effects on developmental outcomes.
Beyond theory, empirical studies have verified the mediating role of identification with one’s social group in the relationship between perceived discrimination and developmental outcomes [20,64,65]. However, other research has shown that ethnic identity mediates the discrimination–distress relationship among men but not women [66]. Findings regarding the effect of perceived ethnic discrimination on ethnic identity have also been mixed. For example, Pahl and Way [67] have validated social identity theory by showing that discrimination prompts the search for belonging and attachment in a marginalised group. Those findings suggest that experiencing discrimination from out-group members can intensify individuals’ identification with their group [68,69,70]. However, ethnic minorities may also be determined to gain acceptance from the majority and thus downplay their ethnicity [71]. In such cases, perceived ethnic discrimination negatively affects individuals’ ethnic identity [48]. Despite limited studies having been conducted in Chinese contexts, the existing two studies both have indicated that perceived ethnic discrimination reduces one’s identification with ethnic groups [72,73], which seems to suggest that ethnic discrimination contributes to a negative reconstruction of ethnic identity in Chinese culture.
All of those inconsistent findings indicate that the mediating effect of ethnic identity in the relationship between perceived ethnic discrimination and developmental outcomes needs to be further examined. In addition to that, recent studies on the mental health of adolescents have failed to examine adolescents’ other developmental outcomes, including behavioural adjustment and social competence. Because so few of those studies have been conducted in China, more research is warranted that explores ethnic identity’s mediating effect in the relationship between perceived ethnic discrimination and various developmental outcomes among ethnic minority adolescents in China.

1.5. The Present Study

As the literature review has shown, despite well-established evidence of the correlation between perceived discrimination and developmental outcomes among adolescents, research differentiating discrimination based on personal characteristics versus group membership has been few and far between, especially in the population of ethnic minority adolescents in Chinese contexts. On top of that, although the association between ethnic discrimination and ethnic identity has been widely explored, the conclusions drawn have been inconsistent. Last, the potential mediating role of self-esteem in the relationships between perceived academic discrimination and developmental outcomes, and the potential mediator of ethnic identity in the relationships between perceived ethnic discrimination and the same outcomes has yet to be tested in an integrated framework. In response, our study was designed to address those gaps in the research. Figure 1 illustrates the study’s conceptual framework, from which four hypotheses were developed:
Hypothesis 1.
Adolescents with a higher level of perceived academic discrimination are more likely to have lower levels of behavioural adjustment, mental health, and social competence.
Hypothesis 2.
Adolescents with a higher level of perceived ethnic discrimination are more likely to have lower levels of behavioural adjustment, mental health, and social competence.
Hypothesis 3.
Adolescents with a higher level of perceived academic discrimination are more likely to have less self-esteem, which lowers their levels of behavioural adjustment, mental health, and social competence.
Hypothesis 4.
Adolescents with a higher level of perceived ethnic discrimination are more likely to have a lower level of ethnic identity, which lowers their levels of behavioural adjustment, mental health, and social competence.

2. Materials and Methods

Considering the fact that key variables of this study (e.g., ethnic identity and social competence) are complex phenomena that can neither be observed directly nor measured accurately with one single item, and the complex relationships among variables within the theoretical framework, structural equation modelling was performed to test the research hypotheses. This statistical analysis procedure provides significant advantages in examining relationships among latent variables measured by multiple items, and allows simultaneous tests of all the relationships [74], which has been widely used for testing mediation models [75,76]. The following paragraphs describe the participants and procedure, measures, and data analysis strategy.

2.1. Participants and Procedure

Following a procedure of multistage cluster random sampling, a self-administrated survey was conducted from October to December in 2019, in the cities of Dali and Kunming in Yunnan Province, China, which is home to numerous ethnic minority groups [73]. Once four districts were selected from the cities—two in Dali, two in Kunming—four middle schools, one from each district, were chosen at random. The four selected schools all agreed to participate in the survey. In each grade, four classes were randomly selected, and all students in those classes were invited to participate. Informed consent was obtained from all invited participants and their parents prior to the study, which was approved by our affiliated institution’s Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee. Ultimately, 813 Bai adolescents were recruited; their demographic information appears in Table 1.
Bai is a large ethnic group in Yunnan province. Despite more and more similarities being found between Bai and Han people owing to their increasing communications, the differences in language, religious beliefs, customs and traditions distinguish Bai from Han people in China. While keeping their unique cultures and traditions, Bai people adopt new cultural elements to enrich their original culture, resulting in their connection to the Bai community as well as to the mainstream culture [77].

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Developmental Outcomes

Developmental outcomes were measured in three dimensions: behavioural adjustment, mental health, and social competence. First, behavioural adjustment was measured using three items (e.g., “Assisting schools and social service organisations to carry out activities”) adapted from the Behavioural Adjustment Scale [78], and were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The composite score of the three items yielded a reliability alpha coefficient of 0.665. Second, mental health was assessed using three items (e.g., “I feel lonely”) adapted from the Mental Health Scale [79] and rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The reliability of the scale was 0.772. Last, social competence was measured using five items (e.g., “I know how to communicate with others”) adapted from the Social Competence subscale of the Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale [80], rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The scale achieved a reliability alpha coefficient of 0.791.

2.2.2. Self-Esteem

Self-esteem was measured using four items (e.g., “I am able to do things as well as most other people”) adapted from the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale [14]. Although the original response scale ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), it was expanded to a 5-point scale to be consistent with other instruments used in the study. The scale had a reliability alpha coefficient of 0.801.

2.2.3. Ethnic Identity

Ethnic identity was measured using four items (e.g., “I understand pretty well what my ethnic group membership means to me”) adapted from Phinney and Ong’s [81] Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure-Revised scale and rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The scale had a reliability alpha coefficient of 0.774.

2.2.4. Perceived Academic Discrimination

Perceived academic discrimination was measured using three items (e.g., “I was wrongly disciplined or given after-school detention”) from the Educational Discrimination Distress subscale of the Adolescent Discrimination Distress Index [82]. On a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always), participants indicated how often they had experienced discrimination due to their academic achievement. The composite score of the three items yielded a reliability alpha coefficient of 0.622.

2.2.5. Perceived Ethnic Discrimination

Perceived ethnic discrimination was assessed using three items (e.g., “People act as if I am not smart”) adapted from the Everyday Discrimination Scale [83]. Participants were asked to indicate how often they had experienced discrimination due to their ethnicity on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The composite score of the three items yielded a reliability alpha coefficient of 0.798.

2.2.6. Covariates

Sociodemographic variables, including age, gender (1 = male, 0 = female), household socioeconomic status, and school type (1 = ethnic minority school, 0 = ordinary school), were controlled when testing the hypotheses. Considering the possible unreliability of household income [84], household socio-economic status was measured with two indicators: parents’ level of education (1 = less than primary school, 6 = university or more) and parents’ employment status (1 = unemployed, 5 = senior managers) following Shi and Shen [85].

2.3. Data Analysis Strategy

To test the relationships between the independent variables, dependent variables, and mediating variables, structural equation modelling was performed in Amos version 25.0. First, a measurement model was tested in confirmatory factor analysis to examine how well the observed variables represented the corresponding latent variables. After the measurement model was validated, the structural paths among the key variables were tested in a structural model. Three indicators of goodness-of-fit were adopted to assess both the measurement and structural models. The first was the chi-square value (χ2), for which a non-significant χ2 indicates a good model fit [86]. Considering that χ2 is sensitive to sample size [87], a significant χ2 is also acceptable when the sample size is large (N > 200) [88]. The second was the comparative fit index (CFI), for which values exceeding 0.90 generally indicate a good fit [89]. The third was the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), for which values less than 0.08 indicate a “close fit” [88]. Last, mediating effects were tested by bootstrapping with 2000 iterations and bias-corrected 95% confidence intervals (CI) [90]. Any indirect effect with a CI excluding 0 indicated a significant mediating effect on the dependent variables.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Statistics and Preliminary Analyses

Table 2 provides a correlation matrix summarising the bivariate correlations between the key variables. As shown, most of the variables were significantly associated with each other in the expected directions. Perceived academic discrimination was negatively correlated with self-esteem and the three dimensions of the developmental outcomes (i.e., behavioural adjustment, mental health, and social competence). Meanwhile, perceived ethnic discrimination was negatively correlated with self-esteem, ethnic identity, and the three dimensions of the developmental outcomes, and both self-esteem and ethnic identity were positively related with all three dimensions as well.

3.2. Test of the Measurement Model

The measurement model showed a good fit (χ2 = 495.759, df = 254, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.961, and RMSEA = 0.034), and all observed variables were significantly loaded on the corresponding latent constructs. The standardised factor loadings of indicators for each latent construct in the measurement model ranged from 0.372 to 0.828, and thus met the commonly adopted threshold for acceptable loadings (0.30) [91], which suggests that the indicators represented the underlying constructs in a statistically reliable manner. Table 3 presents the standardised factor loadings of all indicators on each latent construct.

3.3. Test of the Structural Model

Figure 2 demonstrates the standardised solutions for the structural model; for brevity’s sake, only significant paths are displayed. In addition, the total, direct, and indirect effects generated from bootstrapping are presented in Table 4. The structural model provided a good fit with the data (χ2 = 807.244, df = 340, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.928, RMSEA = 0.041). In all, the model explained 24.7% of the variance for behavioural adjustment, 19.0% for mental health, and 32.0% for social competence.
The results indicate that perceived academic discrimination was directly related to mental health (β = −0.228, p < 0.01) but not behavioural adjustment or social competence. It was also indirectly related to behavioural adjustment (β = −0.030, p <0.05), mental health (β = −0.065, p < 0.001), and social competence (β = −0.066, p < 0.001). Those results suggest that self-esteem partly mediated the relationship between perceived academic discrimination and mental health, and fully mediated the relationships between perceived academic discrimination and both behavioural adjustment and social competence.
Meanwhile, perceived ethnic discrimination was directly associated with behavioural adjustment (β = −0.118, p < 0.05) and social competence (β = −0.110, p < 0.05) but not mental health. It was also indirectly associated with behavioural adjustment (β = −0.040, p < 0.05) and social competence (β = −0.041, p < 0.05) but not mental health. Those results indicate that ethnic identity partly mediated the relationship between perceived ethnic discrimination and adolescents’ behavioural adjustment and social competence.

4. Discussion

Although research on perceived discrimination and developmental outcomes has advanced greatly during the past decade, lingering gaps in knowledge on the topic need to be filled. Thus, in a sample of ethnic minority adolescents in mainland China, our study examined the correlation between perceived discrimination and developmental outcomes, self-esteem’s mediating role in the association between perceived academic discrimination and those outcomes, and ethnic identity’s mediating role in the association between perceived ethnic discrimination and the outcomes.
Among the results, whereas perceived academic discrimination was negatively associated with mental health, perceived ethnic discrimination was negatively associated with behavioural adjustment and social competence. Those findings are consistent with the integrative model developed by Coll et al. [27], and the results of previous empirical studies [34,92] showing that perceived discrimination contributes to poor developmental outcomes among ethnic minority adolescents. In other words, adolescents who have been discriminated against tend to have worse behavioural outcomes and social competence. However, perceived discrimination was not associated with every dimension of the developmental outcomes. An explanation for this discrepancy could be that studies have usually examined only one kind of discrimination or one dimension of developmental outcomes [93,94]. However, in our study, perceived discrimination demonstrated different effects on development when two kinds of discrimination (i.e., perceived academic discrimination and perceived ethnic discrimination) and three dimensions of developmental outcomes (i.e., behavioural adjustment, mental health, and social competence) were considered at once.
Our study also revealed that self-esteem functioned as a mediator in the associations between perceived academic discrimination and all three of those dimensions. Perceived academic discrimination was significantly associated with lower self-esteem, which lowered levels of the developmental outcomes among the adolescents. Those findings maintain symbolic interactionist theory and corroborate the results of previous empirical studies [16,51], which indicate that perceived academic discrimination can cause adolescents to accept others’ negative appraisals of them and develop low self-esteem. However, whereas previous research on the topic has primarily targeted ethnic majority adolescents—that is, Han adolescents—our research has extended those studies by revealing that perceived academic discrimination significantly reduced the self-esteem of ethnic minority adolescents.
Furthermore, self-esteem positively affected all the three dimensions of adolescents’ developmental outcomes in our study. This result aligns with previous results showing that self-esteem was associated with multiple positive developmental outcomes [55,95,96]. Self-esteem has been recognised as an important personal resource for promoting developmental outcomes among adolescents and as an important factor in mitigating social maladjustment [97], which suggests that self-esteem is positively associated with developmental outcomes.
Among our other results, perceived ethnic discrimination negatively affected ethnic identity, which consequently predicted adolescents’ behavioural adjustment and social competence. This result partly supports social identity theory, which holds that experiencing ethnic discrimination from out-group members intensifies individuals’ identification with their ethnic group, which serves to alleviate some of the harm done to their developmental outcomes [63]. Consistent with that theory, our study showed that ethnic identity mediated the association between perceived ethnic discrimination and adolescents’ developmental outcomes. However, instead of the positive relationship proposed by social identity theory, a negative relationship emerged between perceived ethnic discrimination and ethnic identity, as also found in a previous study conducted in a Chinese context [73].
A possible reason for that conflicting result is that considerable differences exist between ethnic minorities in Western countries and ones in mainland China, due to their different social contexts. In Western contexts, on the one hand, ethnic minority groups are from different countries and have distinct skin colours, languages, and customs. Even though societies in those contexts prohibit ethnic discrimination, such discrimination remains prevalent [98]. In such cases, group boundaries are considered to be impermeable, and status relations are considered to be stable. To maintain a positive identity, individuals in those contexts are likely to turn to their own ethnic groups, which can provide them with a sense of belonging and, in turn, strengthen their ethnic identity [99]. However, in Chinese contexts, although ethnic minorities have their own languages and customs, they share the Chinese culture in which they are born and live. Education in patriotism, ethnic equality, and unity are emphasised from primary education onwards, and various supporting policies for ethnic minorities have been implemented. As a result, group boundaries are considered to be permeable. When discriminated against, individuals are more likely to pursue personal goals to maintain their positive identity instead of turning to their ethnic group [100]. Under those circumstances, perceived ethnic discrimination may threaten instead of enhance one’s ethnic identity. In that way, studies conducted in different social contexts may suggest different conclusions. Such differences capture the inappropriateness of directly imposing Western theories in non-Western contexts, at least Chinese ones, and suggest that cross-cultural validity should be tested with empirical data.
Another finding was ethnic identity’s positive association with behavioural adjustment and social competence, which corroborates past results suggesting that ethnic identity predicts positive developmental outcomes [64,65,101,102]. However, ethnic identity had no significant effect on adolescents’ mental health, which conflicts with what previous research has shown [103]. A possible reason for this inconsistency could be that researchers have usually considered only ethnic identity as a variable of self-concept [104]. However, in our study, self-concept on both the personal level (i.e., self-esteem) and social level (i.e., ethnic identity) were included, and self-esteem was a strong predictor of adolescents’ mental health. Accordingly, it is possible that ethnic identity did not significantly affect mental health.

5. Limitations and Prospects

This study has several limitations. First, the cross-sectional design limits the possibility of delineating causality among the variables. Therefore, a longitudinal design is needed in future research to fully explore the relationships examined in our study. Second, data were collected from two cities in south-western China, which makes it impossible to generalise the study’s findings. As an antidote, future studies should form more diverse samples from more extensive regions. Third, the data in our study were self-reported by adolescents. Considering the sensitive nature of the topic of discrimination, future studies should collect information from multiple sources, including peers and parents. Furthermore, because adolescents from different ethnic groups can differ in important ways, future studies should involve more adolescents from different ethnic minority groups and examine whether perceived discrimination’s effects on their developmental outcomes differ across them.
Despite the limitations, our study has enriched the current body of literature on perceived discrimination and ethnic minority adolescents’ developmental outcomes, and has important implications for practice geared towards reducing the negative effects of perceived discrimination on adolescents’ developmental outcomes. On a theoretical level, our study has advanced understanding of the effects of perceived discrimination, self-esteem, and ethnic identity on developmental outcomes. Moreover, in distinguishing perceived discrimination based on personal characteristics and discrimination based on group membership, as well as by comparing the different impacts and mechanisms of those two kinds of discrimination on developmental outcomes, the study has provided empirical evidence of the necessity of differentiating discrimination, particularly in a sample of Bai adolescents in China. Furthermore, the findings of our study partly support social identity theory, which extends current understandings of the implications of theories in different cultural backgrounds. Added to that, our study has provided an integrated framework for future research to explore the mechanism of different types of discrimination on developmental outcomes.
For social work interventions and social policies, our study provides empirical evidence that perceived discrimination is associated with adverse outcomes for Bai adolescents’ development. Social work interventions should be developed to lessen such negative forms of discrimination at schools. Likewise, social work programmes promoting intergroup contact should be established to help adolescents to learn more about other ethnic groups’ history, culture, and traditions, thereby improving intergroup relationships and reducing discrimination in the population [1]. Social policies emphasising the equality and unity of all ethnic groups should be continuously implemented to protect the legitimate rights and interests of all ethnic minorities and to prohibit the discrimination and oppression of any ethnic group. Last, our study showed that self-esteem mediated perceived academic discrimination and developmental outcomes, that ethnic identity mediated perceived ethnic discrimination and the same outcomes, and that self-esteem and ethnic identity were both positively related to adolescents’ development. Given those results, promoting ethnic minority adolescents’ self-esteem and ethnic identity could be an effective strategy used in social work practice to reduce the negative effects of discrimination on ethnic minority adolescents’ developmental outcomes.

6. Conclusions

Our findings validate perceived academic discrimination’s negative impact on mental health and perceived ethnic discrimination’s negative impact on behavioural adjustment and social competence among Bai adolescents. Meanwhile, they corroborate self-esteem’s mediating role in the relationships between perceived academic discrimination and all three dimensions of developmental outcomes among adolescents (i.e., behavioural adjustment, mental health, and social competence), as well as ethnic identity’s mediating role in the relationships between their perceived academic discrimination and both behavioural adjustment and social competence. Overall, our work has deepened current understandings of how different kinds of perceived discrimination affect developmental outcomes among ethnic minority adolescents in China and extends current understandings of the implications of social identity theory in different cultural backgrounds. Moreover, it provides practical implications for policymakers and social workers in China to promote ethnic minority adolescents’ developmental outcomes through boosting their self-esteem and ethnic identity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z. and S.S.-y.N.; methodology, L.Z. and S.S.-y.N.; software, L.Z.; validation, L.Z. and S.S.-y.N.; formal analysis, L.Z.; investigation, L.Z.; resources, L.Z.; data curation, L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.Z. and S.S.-y.N.; visualization, L.Z.; supervision, S.S.-y.N.; project administration, L.Z. and S.S.-y.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (protocol code SBRE-19-001; approved on 21 August 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Parental informed consent and informed consent were obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to datasets containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (L.Z.) upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The data for this study were collected with the support from The Education Bureau of Dali and Kunming City. Special thanks to the schools supporting and participating in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allport, G.W. The Nature of Prejudice; Addison-Wesley: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rosette, A.S.; Akinola, M.; Ma, A. Subtle discrimination in the workplace: Individual-level factors and processes. In The Oxford Handbook of Workplace Discrimination; Colella, A.J., King, E.B., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 7–24. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hou, Y.; Kim, S.Y.; Hazen, N.; Benner, A.D. Parents’ perceived discrimination and adolescent adjustment in Chinese American families: Mediating family processes. Child Dev. 2017, 88, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Benner, A.D.; Graham, S. The antecedents and consequences of racial/ethnic discrimination during adolescence: Does the source of discrimination matter? Dev. Psychol. 2013, 49, 1602–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gonzalez, L.M.; Stein, G.L.; Kiang, L.; Cupito, A.M. The impact of discrimination and support on developmental competencies in Latino Adolescents. J. Lat. Psychol. 2014, 2, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gage, N.A.; Larson, A.; Sugai, G.; Chafouleas, S.M. Student perceptions of school climate as predictors of office discipline referrals. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2016, 53, 492–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Benner, A.D.; Kim, S.Y. Experiences of discrimination among Chinese American adolescents and the consequences for socioemotional and academic development. Dev. Psychol. 2009, 45, 1682–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Chambers, B.D.; Erausquin, J.T. Race, sex, and discrimination in school settings: A multilevel analysis of associations with delinquency. J. Sch. Health 2018, 88, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Oxman-Martinez, J.; Choi, Y.R. Newcomer children: Experiences of inclusion and exclusion, and their outcomes. Soc. Incl. 2014, 2, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhongguo 2010 Nian Renkou Pucha Ziliao [Tabulation on the 2010 Population Census of the People’s Republic of China]. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/pcsj/rkpc/6rp/indexch.htm (accessed on 7 December 2018).
  11. Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A.J.; Ortega-Ruiz, R.; Monks, C.P. Peer-victimisation in multi-cultural contexts: A structural model of the effects on self-esteem and emotions. Psicol. Educ. 2015, 21, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Verkuyten, M.; Thijs, J. Peer victimization and self-esteem of ethnic minority adolescents. J. Community Appl. Soc 2001, 11, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, L.Y. Jiaoshi Xinli Sushi Zhaunti [Special Topic on Teachers’ Psychological Quality]; Dangdai Shijie Chubanshe: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosenberg, M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brownfield, D.; Thompson, K. Self-concept and delinquency: The effects of reflected appraisals by parent and peers. West. Criminol. Rev. 2005, 6, 22–29. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jhang, F.H. Economically disadvantaged adolescents’ self-concept and academic achievement as mediators between family cohesion and mental health in Taiwan. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2017, 15, 407–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhong, M.; Huang, X.; Huebner, E.S.; Tian, L. Association between bullying victimization and depressive symptoms in children: The mediating role of self-esteem. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 294, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tajfel, H. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jun, J.W.; Cho, J.H.; Lee, J.H. Why Do Koreans Love Ethnic Players in the MLB? A Focus on Ethnic Identity and Player Identification. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Betts, K.R.; Hinsz, V.B. Group marginalization: Extending research on interpersonal rejection to small groups. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2013, 17, 355–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Erikson, E.H. Childhood and Society; Norton: New York, NY, USA, 1963. [Google Scholar]
  22. Knight, Z.G. A proposed model of psychodynamic psychotherapy linked to Erik Erikson’s eight stages of psychosocial development. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 2017, 24, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Arnett, J.J. Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: A Cultural Approach, 5th ed.; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  24. Meeus, W. Adolescent psychosocial development: A review of longitudinal models and research. Dev. Psychol. 2016, 52, 1969–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ngai, S.S.Y.; Cheung, C.K.; To, S.M.; Liu, Y.; Song, H.Y. Parent–child relationships, friendship networks, and developmental outcomes of economically disadvantaged youth in Hong Kong. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2013, 35, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, M.T.; Henry, D.A.; Smith, L.V.; Huguley, J.P.; Guo, J. Parental ethnic-racial socialization practices and children of color’s psychosocial and behavioral adjustment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. Psychol. 2020, 75, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Coll, C.G.; Crnic, K.; Lamberty, G.; Wasik, B.H.; Jenkins, R.; Garcia, H.V.; McAdoo, H.P. An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Dev. 1996, 67, 1891–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Seaton, E.K.; Gee, G.C.; Neblett, E.; Spanierman, L. New directions for racial discrimination research as inspired by the integrative model. Am. Psychol. 2018, 73, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kiang, L.; Wilkinson, B.C.; Juang, L.P. The markings of linked fate among Asian Americans and Latinxs. Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 2021. Advance Online Publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, A.X.; He, S.L. Jiaoyu Qishi De Biduan Chengyin Ji Xiaochu Duice [The negative effects, causes, and coping strategies of educational discrimination]. Jiaoxue Yu Guanli-Lilunban 2017, 34, 19–21. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun, Y.M.; Cheng, H.Y. Jiaoshi huayu Shijian de gongzhengxing shenshi [An examination on the justice of teachers’ discursive practice]. Jiaoxue Yu Guanli-Zhongxue Ban 2014, 31, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yuan, Q. Xuexiao changyu zhong de yinxing jiaoyu qishi tanxi [A study on recessive education discrimination in the school field]. Quanqiu Jiaoyu Zhanwang 2013, 42, 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zu, Y. Buke hushi zhongxiaoxue jiaoyu zhong de fenshu qishi xianxiang [The non-negligibility of grade discrimination in primary and secondary education]. Jiaoyu Yanjiu Yu Shiyan 2000, 18, 10–11. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jia, E.N. Jiaoyu qishi xianxiang de shenshi yu fansi [Reflection on the phenomenon of educational discrimination]. Jiaoxue Yu Guanli-Lilun Ban 2016, 33, 10–13. [Google Scholar]
  35. Arat, G.; Hoang, A.P.; Jordan, L.P.; Wong, P. A systematic review of studies on ethnic minority youth development in Hong Kong: An application of the ecological framework. China J. Soc. Work. 2016, 9, 218–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Myrick, S.E.; Martorell, G.A. Sticks and stones may break my bones: Protective factors for the effects of perceived discrimination on social competence in adolescence. Pers. Relatsh. 2011, 18, 487–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Umaña-Taylor, A.J.; Tynes, B.M.; Toomey, R.B.; Williams, D.R.; Mitchell, K.J. Latino adolescents’ perceived discrimination in online and offline settings: An examination of cultural risk and protective factors. Dev. Psychol. 2015, 51, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hoglund, W.L.; Hosan, N.E. The context of ethnicity: Peer victimization and adjustment problems in early adolescence. J. Early Adolesc. 2013, 33, 585–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stein, G.L.; Gonzalez, L.M.; Huq, N. Cultural stressors and the hopelessness model of depressive symptoms in Latino adolescents. J. Youth Adolesc. 2012, 41, 1339–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zeiders, K.H.; Umaña-Taylor, A.J.; Derlan, C.L. Trajectories of depressive symptoms and self-esteem in Latino youths: Examining the role of gender and perceived discrimination. Dev. Psychol. 2013, 49, 951–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Priest, N.; Perry, R.; Ferdinand, A.; Paradies, Y.; Kelaher, M. Experiences of racism, racial/ethnic attitudes, motivated fairness and mental health outcomes among primary and secondary school students. J. Youth Adolesc. 2014, 43, 1672–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yip, T. Ethnic/racial identity—A double-edged sword? Associations with discrimination and psychological outcomes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2018, 27, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bayram Özdemir, S.; Özdemir, M.; Stattin, H. Ethnic harassment and immigrant youth’s engagement in violent behaviors: Understanding the risk factors. Child Dev. 2019, 90, 808–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. McKenney, K.S.; Pepler, D.; Craig, W.; Connolly, J. Peer victimization and psychosocial adjustment: The experiences of Canadian immigrant youth. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 2006, 4, 239–264. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, T. Social identity dimensions and consumer behavior in social media. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 2017, 22, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Turner, J.C. Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content; Ellemers, N., Spears, R., Doosje, B., Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1999; pp. 6–34. [Google Scholar]
  47. Verkuyten, M.; Thijs, J. Ethnic discrimination and global self-worth in early adolescents: The mediating role of ethnic self-esteem. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2006, 30, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Trepte, S.; Loy, L.S. Social identity theory and self-categorization theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects; Rossler, P., Hoffner, C.A., van Zoonen, L., Eds.; Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gecas, V. The self-concept. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1982, 8, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Qi, X.M.; Wang, J. Yong falv xiaochu “xiaoyuan qishi” xianxiang [Eliminating the discrimination at school through laws]. Shandong Jiaoyu Keyan 2001, 16, 35–36. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wen, H.; Yuan, D.S. Lun weichengnianren shoujiaoyuquan de pingdeng baozhang-yi “lvlingjin” shijian wei qieru. Zhengfa Luncong 2012, 28, 30–35. [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu, G.; Zhang, D.; Pan, Y.; Ma, Y.; Lu, X. The effect of psychological suzhi on problem behaviors in Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of subjective social status and self-esteem. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sowislo, J.F.; Orth, U. Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol. Bull. 2013, 139, 213–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gauthier-Duchesne, A.; Hébert, M.; Blais, M. Child sexual abuse, self-esteem, and delinquent behaviors during adolescence: The moderating role of gender. J. Interpers. Violence 2021, 36, 08862605211001466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fu, X.; Padilla-Walker, L.M.; Brown, M.N. Longitudinal relations between adolescents’ self-esteem and prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends and family. J. Adolesc. 2017, 57, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bolton, J.M.; Robinson, J.; Sareen, J. Self-medication of mood disorders with alcohol and drugs in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J. Affect. Disord. 2009, 115, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Çakar, F.S.; Tagay, Ö. The mediating role of self-esteem: The effects of social support and subjective well-being on adolescents’ risky behaviors. Educ. Sci. Theory Pract. 2017, 17, 859–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Chang, C.W.; Yuan, R.; Chen, J.K. Social support and depression among Chinese adolescents: The mediating roles of self-esteem and self-efficacy. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2018, 88, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, C.; Dickson, D.A.; Conley, C.S.; Holmbeck, G.N. A closer look at self-esteem, perceived social support, and coping strategy: A prospective study of depressive symptomatology across the transition to college. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2014, 33, 560–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Arslan, G. Psychological maltreatment, emotional and behavioral problems in adolescents: The mediating role of resilience and self-esteem. Child Abuse Negl. 2016, 52, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Arslan, G. Mediating role of the self–esteem and resilience in the association between social exclusion and life satisfaction among adolescents. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2019, 151, 109514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Scheepers, D.; Ellemers, N. Social identity theory. In Social Psychology in Action; Sassenberg, K., Vliek, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 129–143. [Google Scholar]
  63. Tajfel, H.; Turner, J.C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In The Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations; Austin, W., Worchel, S., Eds.; Brooks/Cole: Monterey, CA, USA, 1986; pp. 7–24. [Google Scholar]
  64. Forrest-Bank, S.S.; Cuellar, M.J. The mediating effects of ethnic identity on the relationships between racial microaggression and psychological well-being. Soc. Work Res. 2018, 42, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Schmitt, M.T.; Branscombe, N.R.; Kobrynowicz, D.; Owen, S. Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull 2002, 28, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cassidy, C.; O’connor, R.C.; Howe, C.; Warden, D. Perceived discrimination and psychological distress: The role of personal and ethnic self-esteem. J. Couns. Psychol. 2004, 51, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Pahl, K.; Way, N. Longitudinal trajectories of ethnic identity among urban Black and Latino adolescents. Child Dev. 2006, 77, 1403–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Branscombe, N.R.; Schmitt, M.T.; Harvey, R.D. Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol 1999, 77, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Brittian, A.S.; Yeong Kim, S.; Armenta, B.E.; Lee, R.M.; Umaña-Taylor, A.J.; Schwartz, S.J.; Villalta, I.K.; Zamboanga, B.L.; Weisskirch, R.S.; Juang, L.P.; et al. Do dimensions of ethnic identity mediate the association between perceived ethnic group discrimination and depressive symptoms? Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 2015, 21, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Urzúa, A.; Caqueo-Urízar, A.; Henríquez, D.; Domic, M.; Acevedo, D.; Ralph, S.; Reyes, G.; Tang, D. Ethnic Identity as a Mediator of the Relationship between Discrimination and Psychological Well-Being in South-South Migrant Populations. Int. J. Environ. 2021, 18, 2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Cheryan, S.; Monin, B. Where are you really from? Asian Americans and identity denial. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2005, 89, 717–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Chen, Z. Taiwanese Aboriginal Education; Macmillan Co. Ltd.: Taipei, Taiwan, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  73. Yao, J.; Yang, L. Perceived prejudice and the mental health of Chinese ethnic minority college students: The chain mediating effect of ethnic identity and hope. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Mueller, R.O.; Hancock, G.R. Structural equation modeling. In The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences; Stapleton, L.M., Mueller, R.O., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  75. Ferrajão, P.; Elklit, A. Attachment and social support mediate associations between polyvictimization and psychological distress in early Uganda and Kenya adolescents. Child Abuse Negl. 2021, 121, 105271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, S.; Hong, J.S.; Garthe, R.C.; Espelage, D.L.; Schacter, H.L. Parental stress and adolescent bullying perpetration and victimization: The mediating role of adolescent anxiety and family resilience. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 290, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kou, Y.; Huang, Y. A study on ethnic identity status and its contextual factors among college students of Bai nationality in Yunnan. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 2015, 6, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Ngai, S.S.Y.; Cheung, C.K.; Ngai, N.P. Effects of service use, family social capital and school social capital on psychosocial development among economically disadvantaged secondary school students in Hong Kong. Int. J. Adolesc. Youth. 2012, 17, 131–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gruber, J.E.; Fineran, S. Comparing the impact of bullying and sexual harassment victimization on the mental and physical health of adolescents. Sex Roles 2008, 59, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shek, D.T.L.; Siu, A.M.H.; Yan, T. The Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: A validation study. Res. Soc. Work Pract. 2007, 17, 380–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Phinney, J.S.; Ong, A.D. Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions. J. Couns. Psychol. 2007, 54, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Fisher, C.B.; Wallace, S.A.; Fenton, R.E. Discrimination distress during adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 2000, 29, 679–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Williams, D.R.; Yu, Y.; Jackson, J.S.; Anderson, N.B. Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. J. Health Psychol. 1997, 2, 335–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Sun, Z.X. Xueye shibai wenti de jiating shehui jingji diwei yanjiu [A study on the academic failure and family socioeconomic status]. Qinghua Daxue Jiaoyu Yanjiu 1999, 20, 47–51. [Google Scholar]
  85. Shi, B.G.; Shen, J.L. Jiating shehui jingji diwei zhili he neibu dongji yu chuangzaoxing de guanxi. Xinli Fazhan Yu Jiaoyu 2007, 23, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
  86. Bollen, K.A. A new incremental fit index for general structural models. Sociol. Methods Res. 1989, 17, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Steiger, J.H. Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivar. Behav. Res. 1990, 25, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  89. Bentler, P.M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 1990, 107, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 2008, 40, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Agnew, R. A longitudinal test of social control theory and delinquency. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 1991, 28, 126–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Maes, M.; Stevens, G.W.; Verkuyten, M. Perceived ethnic discrimination and problem behaviors in Muslim immigrant early adolescents: Moderating effects of ethnic, religious, and national group identification. J. Early Adolesc. 2014, 34, 940–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bernard, D.L.; Halliday, C.A.; Are, F.; Banks, D.E.; Danielson, C.K. Rumination as a Mediator of the Association Between Racial Discrimination and Depression Among Black Youth. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2021, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Reid Marks, L.; Thurston, I.B.; Kamody, R.C.; Schaeffer-Smith, M. The role of multiracial identity integration in the relation between racial discrimination and depression in multiracial young adults. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 2020, 51, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gaylord-Harden, N.K.; Ragsdale, B.L.; Mandara, J.; Richards, M.H.; Petersen, A.C. Perceived support and internalizing symptoms in African American adolescents: Self-esteem and ethnic identity as mediators. J. Youth Adolesc. 2007, 36, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Poudel, A.; Gurung, B.; Khanal, G.P. Perceived social support and psychological wellbeing among Nepalese adolescents: The mediating role of self-esteem. BMC Psychol. 2020, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Romera, E.M.; Gómez-Ortiz, O.; Ortega-Ruiz, R. The mediating role of psychological adjustment between peer victimization and social adjustment in adolescence. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Park, I.J.; Du, H.; Wang, L.; Williams, D.R.; Alegría, M. The Role of Parents’ Ethnic-Racial Socialization Practices in the Discrimination–Depression Link among Mexican-Origin Adolescents. J. Clin. Child Psychol. 2019, 49, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hogg, M.A. Social identity theory. In Understanding Peace and Conflict through Social Identity Theory; McKeown, S., Haji, R., Ferguson, N., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar]
  100. Tajfel, H.; Turner, J.C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations; Austin, W.G., Worchel, S., Eds.; Brooks/Cole: Monterey, CA, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  101. Meca, A.; Sabet, R.F.; Farrelly, C.M.; Benitez, C.G.; Schwartz, S.J.; Gonzales-Backen, M.; Lorenzo-Blanco, E.I.; Unger, J.B.; Zamboanga, B.L.; Baezconde-Garbanati, L.; et al. Personal and cultural identity development in recently immigrated Hispanic adolescents: Links with psychosocial functioning. Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 2017, 23, 348–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Smith, T.B.; Silva, L. Ethnic identity and personal well-being of people of color: A meta-analysis. J. Couns. Psychol. 2011, 58, 42–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Medina, M.A.; Rivas-Drake, D.; Jagers, R.J.; Rowley, S.J. Friends matter: Ethnic racial identity and school adjustment among African American and Latino early adolescents. Appl. Dev. Sci. 2020, 24, 376–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Diaz, T.; Bui, N.H. Subjective well-being in Mexican and Mexican American women: The role of acculturation, ethnic identity, gender roles, and perceived social support. J. Happiness Stud. 2017, 18, 607–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Theoretical framework and research hypotheses.
Figure 1. Theoretical framework and research hypotheses.
Ijerph 19 00657 g001
Figure 2. Standardised solutions for the structural model. Note. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2. Standardised solutions for the structural model. Note. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Ijerph 19 00657 g002
Table 1. Demographic information of participants (N = 813).
Table 1. Demographic information of participants (N = 813).
VariableFrequency (N)Percentage (%)
GenderMale38247.0
Female43153.0
School typeMinority School 37946.6
Ordinary School43453.4
Paternal
education level
Less than primary school 465.7
Primary school14918.3
Middle school34742.7
High school or vocational school16119.8
Three-year college 607.4
University or more506.2
Maternal
education level
Less than primary school 8610.6
Primary school19824.4
Middle school32439.9
High school or vocational school12315.1
Three-year college 485.9
University or more344.2
Paternal
occupation
Unemployed workers43753.8
Manual labourer or self-employed10412.8
General technical personnel13116.1
Middle-level managers or professional personnel749.1
Senior managers 678.2
Maternal
occupation
Unemployed workers52664.7
Manual labourer or self-employed617.5
General technical personnel12415.3
Middle-level managers orprofessional personnel536.5
Senior managers496.0
AgeMean = 13.87 (years)SD = 1.06
Note. Minority schools refer to schools established by the Chinese government to promote the educational development in ethnic minority areas, which have unique cultural characteristics of ethnic minorities and are entitled to a series of preferential policies, such as earmarked development funds.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations for key variables.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations for key variables.
MeanSD1234567
1. PAD1.9310.8791
2. PED1.2170.4800.306 **1
3. SE3.5440.849−0.181 **−0.144 **1
4. EI3.7720.831−0.052−0.079 *0.348 **1
5. BA4.3220.723−0.112 **−0.155 **0.201 **0.327 **1
6. MH3.4401.089−0.204 **−0.100 **0.275 **0.078 *0.079 *
7. SC4.0160.736−0.173 **−0.193 **0.365 **0.386 **0.329 **0.251 **1
Note. PAD: perceived academic discrimination, PED: perceived ethnic discrimination, SE: self-esteem, EI: ethnic identity, BA: behavioural adjustment, MH: mental health, SC: social competence. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table 3. Standardised factor loadings of observed variables on latent constructs.
Table 3. Standardised factor loadings of observed variables on latent constructs.
Latent ConstructObserved VariableFactor Loading
Perceived academic discrimination (PAD)PAD10.372
PAD20.761
PAD30.762
Perceived ethnic discrimination (PED)PED10.658
PED20.828
PED30.801
Self-esteem (SE)SE10.740
SE20.766
SE30.687
SE40.649
Ethnic identity (EI)EI10.679
EI20.763
EI30.740
EI40.555
Behavioural adjustment (BA)BA10.711
BA20.713
BA30.482
Mental health (MH)MH10.672
MH20.819
MH30.707
Social competence (SC)SC10.726
SC20.724
SC30.795
SC40.665
SC50.404
Table 4. Standardised direct, indirect, and total effects.
Table 4. Standardised direct, indirect, and total effects.
PredictorsBA (R2 = 0.247)MH (R2 = 0.190)SC (R2 = 0.320)
DirectIndirectTotalDirectIndirectTotalDirectIndirectTotal
PAD−0.116−0.030 *−0.146 *−0.228 **−0.065 ***−0.293 **−0.098−0.066 ***−0.165 *
PED−0.118 *−0.040 *−0.158 *0.0290.0010.030−0.110 *−0.041 *−0.150 **
SE0.127 *-0.127 *0.274 **-0.274 **0.278 **-0.278 **
EI0.392 **-0.392 **−0.013-−0.0130.397 **-0.397 **
Age0.033-0.033−0.115 **-−0.115 **−0.087 *-−0.087 *
Gen−0.081 *-−0.081 *0.162 **-0.162 **0.041-0.041
SES−0.048-−0.048−0.041-−0.0410.087 *-0.087 *
ST0.073 *-0.073 *−0.075 *-−0.075 *0.017-0.017
Note. PAD: perceived academic discrimination, PED: perceived ethnic discrimination, SE: self-esteem, EI: ethnic identity, BA: behavioural adjustment, MH: mental health, SC: social competence, Gen: gender, SES: socioeconomic status, ST: school type. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01,*** p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, L.; Ngai, S.S.-y. Perceived Discrimination at School and Developmental Outcomes among Bai Adolescents: The Mediating Roles of Self-Esteem and Ethnic Identity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020657

AMA Style

Zhao L, Ngai SS-y. Perceived Discrimination at School and Developmental Outcomes among Bai Adolescents: The Mediating Roles of Self-Esteem and Ethnic Identity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(2):657. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020657

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Lifen, and Steven Sek-yum Ngai. 2022. "Perceived Discrimination at School and Developmental Outcomes among Bai Adolescents: The Mediating Roles of Self-Esteem and Ethnic Identity" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 2: 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020657

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop