Next Article in Journal
Key Components for the Delivery of Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Care Homes in Hong Kong: A Modified Delphi Study
Previous Article in Journal
Territorial Strategy of Medical Units for Addressing the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City: Analysis of Mobility, Accessibility and Marginalization
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Gender-Specific Determinants of eHealth Literacy: Results from an Adolescent Internet Behavior Survey in Taiwan

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(2), 664; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020664
by Chia-Shiang Cheng 1, Yi-Jen Huang 2, Chien-An Sun 3,4, Chi An 5,6, Yu-Tien Chang 2,*,†, Chi-Ming Chu 1,2,4,7,8,9,10,*,† and Chi-Wen Chang 5,11,†
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(2), 664; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020664
Submission received: 7 December 2021 / Revised: 31 December 2021 / Accepted: 2 January 2022 / Published: 7 January 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The topic is interesting  but the authors should pay attention to my in-text comments to improve their manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for taking the time to write a review. Please see our response attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for submitting your manuscript. It is an interesting topic; please allow me to suggest a few improvements or clarifications that I believe are necessary and important in ensuring the quality of your manuscript.

  1. Could you please elaborate on how the questionnaire was distributed? Is it utilising an online medium? If so, what medium did you use? Or was it physically distributed?
  2. In 2.2 Questionnaire, please indicate your ethical clearance in this subtopic as well
  3. The instrument requires further development. How many constructs are there? How many items are there? What scale is being used? Do you use, adapt, or create your own questionnaire?
  4. Please include the instrument's reliability and pilot test data.
  5. Please correct the grammatical and linguistic error

Thank you.

Author Response

Thank you very much for taking the time to write a review. Please see our response attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop