Next Article in Journal
The Evolution of Cold Adaptation Technology within Ancient Buildings in Amur River Basin Viewed from Archaeology
Next Article in Special Issue
A Scoping Review of Theoretical Lenses and Methodological Approaches in Indigenous Women’s Health and Well-Being Research in North America over the Past Two Decades
Previous Article in Journal
Sexual Violence against Adolescents in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil: An Analysis of Reported Cases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Theories of Wellbeing and Their Suitability for Wellbeing Policy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework

1
Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari St., Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
2
School of Management, Faculty of Business, Government and Law, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari St., Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(21), 14478; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114478
Submission received: 19 September 2022 / Revised: 24 October 2022 / Accepted: 1 November 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022

Abstract

Indigenous people and communities are establishing social enterprises to address social disadvantage and overcome health inequities in their communities. This review sought to characterize the spectrum of Indigenous social enterprises in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States to identify the operational models and cultural values that underpin them and their impact on Indigenous health and wellbeing. The scoping review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage methodological framework with recommended enhancements by Levac et al. underpinned by Indigenous Standpoint Theory, and an Indigenous advisory group to provide cultural oversight and direction. Of the 589 documents screened 115 documents were included in the review. A conceptual framework of seven different operational models of Indigenous social enterprises was developed based on differing levels of Indigenous ownership, control, and management: (1) individual, (2) collective, (3) delegative, (4) developmental, (5) supportive, (6) prescriptive and (7) paternalistic. Models with 100% Indigenous ownership and control were more likely to contribute to improved health and wellbeing by increasing self-determination and strengthening culture and promoting healing than others. Indigenous social enterprises could offer a more holistic and sustainable approach to health equity and health promotion than the siloed, programmatic model common in public health policy.
Keywords: Indigenous social enterprise; Indigenous research methodologies; health and wellbeing; self-determination; cultural values; cultural and social determinants of health; hybridity Indigenous social enterprise; Indigenous research methodologies; health and wellbeing; self-determination; cultural values; cultural and social determinants of health; hybridity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hudson, S.; Foley, D.; Cargo, M. Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114478

AMA Style

Hudson S, Foley D, Cargo M. Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(21):14478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114478

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hudson, Sara, Dennis Foley, and Margaret Cargo. 2022. "Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 21: 14478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114478

APA Style

Hudson, S., Foley, D., & Cargo, M. (2022). Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114478

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop