Next Article in Journal
Psychological Impact of Cancellation of Elective Surgeries for Ophthalmic Patients during COVID-19 Pandemic
Next Article in Special Issue
Lung Support Service: Implementation of a Nationwide Text Message Support Program for People with Chronic Respiratory Disease during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Maternal Plasma Glycerophospholipids LC-PUFA Levels Have a Sex-Specific Association with the Offspring’s Cord Plasma Glycerophospholipids-Fatty Acid Desaturation Indices at Birth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Digital Health to Strengthen District-Based Public–Private Mix Tuberculosis Control in Purwakarta District, Indonesia: A Qualitative Research
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

The Experiences of Stakeholders Using Social Media as a Tool for Health Service Design and Quality Improvement: A Scoping Review

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(22), 14851; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214851
by Louisa Walsh 1,*, Nerida Hyett 2, Nicole Juniper 3, Chi Li 4 and Sophie Hill 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(22), 14851; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214851
Submission received: 3 October 2022 / Revised: 8 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 11 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Using Digital Health Technologies to Improve Healthcare Quality)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an excellent scoping review of the existing state of the art literature. The study design and execution is appropriate and supports the goals of the work. All steps and aspects are comprehensively motivated and explained by the authors. Resulting in a clear set of findings and results that are very well categorized. The only very minor question I ask is, why was the period of collecting the sample set from 2004, is there any specific reason? 

Author Response

Thank you for your review. We have prepared on response to all the recommended revisions from the peer reviewers and the editorial team, which is attached. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper deals with an important topic, it is well-structured and methodologically sound.

I would only suggest adding a paragraph in the conclusion part and specifying the implications and suggestions specifically for health services, not for organizations in general. 

The anti plagiarism program Plagscan shows a 10% similarity with other articles, please check for similarities and decrease the percentage. 

Author Response

Thank you for your review. We have prepared on response to all the recommended revisions from the peer reviewers and the editorial team, which is attached. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop