Identification of Socio-Economic Impacts as the Main Drivers of Carbon Stocks in China’s Tropical Rainforests: Implications for REDD+
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- ●
- Extract land use change information for the period 1992 to 2007 as a baseline for REDD+ program in Xishuangbanna.
- ●
- Describe the social and economic driving forces for emissions from land use changes, with a particular focus on deforestation, forestland transformation, and forest degradation.
- ●
- Identify the roles of socio-economic development, agricultural development level, and policies in causing carbon stock changes from deforestation, forestland transformation, and forest degradation.
- ●
- Provide a description of the pathway to conservation of existing forests carbon stocks in the context of REDD+.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
2.2.1. The Procedure Scheme and Interpretation of Land Use Change
2.2.2. Socio-Economic Driving Indicators
2.3. Research Method
2.3.1. IPCC Greenhouse Gas Inventory Method
2.3.2. Normalization Model
2.3.3. Principal Component Model
2.3.4. Stepwise Linear Regression Model
3. Results
3.1. Forests Carbon Stocks
3.2. Results of the Principal Component Analysis
3.3. Results of the Stepwise Linear Regression Model
3.3.1. Forces Driving Deforestation
3.3.2. Forces Driving Forestland Transformation
3.3.3. Forces Driving Forest Degradation
4. Discussion
- (1)
- Previous studies [78,79,80] indicated that rubber plantations and tea plantations replaced Xishangbanna’s most biodiverse native forests due to local priority policies. National policies to protect native forests from clearance and overexploitation, or to encourage reforestation, are interpreted at a local level by county and village officials. Local governments, whose major objectives are improving the local economy and eradicating poverty, are promoting rubber plantations and tea plantations as a means to diversify smallholder incomes. Results from our study support such remarks. The regression equation for rubber plantations shows that the correlation to policy interventions is significantly positive. Furthermore, the model also shows that restricting the conversion of forestland into tea gardens is only possible by an effective strengthening of policies.
- (2)
- REDD+ provides a useful mechanism for forest-related carbon sequestration and, thus, can contribute to controlling rising CO2 levels and help mitigate global warming. As all of REDD’s current programs have been implemented in countries in or near the tropics, the Xishangbanna region plays an important role for China involving REDD+. In this region, China can make contributions to REDD+ through stopping deforestation and forest degradation to reduce emissions.
- (3)
- Direct drivers of deforestation and forest degradation refer human activities or immediate actions that directly impact forest cover and loss of carbon. The most important direct driver is agriculture expansion, which has been identified as the key driver of deforestation in the tropics in the 1980s and 1990s [81,82,83]. In Xishangbanna, our study shows that 20 to 30% of the reduction in forestland was attributable to conversion to cultivated land. Moreover, due to the huge economic benefits of rubber plantations and the national policy support provided to them, the area under these plantations continues to grow at an annual rate of 6.88% [84,85,86].
- (4)
- The direct drivers are considered separately for deforestation and forest degradation [87]. As mentioned above, agriculture expansion is considered as the direct driver of deforestation in Xishuangbanna, while activities such as logging, uncontrolled fires, livestock grazing in forests, and fuel wood collection and charcoal production are considered to be drivers of forest degradation. Our study reveals that in each set of analyzed years, 40% to 50% of the reduction in forested land was attributed to conversion to shrub and grassland due to the degradation of the forest ecosystem.
- (5)
- Rademaekers et al. [88] indicate that poor governance, corruption, low capacity of public forestry agencies, land tenure uncertainties, and inadequate natural resource planning and monitoring can be important underlying factors for deforestation and forest degradation. This is especially true in Xishuangbanna. Imperfect forestland protection policies have led to problems in the forestry management system, and thus, the forestland cannot be fully protected [89]. For example, rubber is an economic forest species, and the activities concerning these plantations are classified as returning farmland to forestland. However, the conversion of forestland into rubber plantations has degraded the forest ecosystem to a certain extent. In addition, the lack of clear property rights associated with forestry resources serve as major barriers in forestry management in Xishuangbanna [90]. For instance, rampant smuggling of timber due to collusion between the staff of the forestry department and illegal elements has been reported [91]. These aspects point to the failure to fully protect forested land.
- (6)
- Gregersen et al. [92] indicate that opportunity costs can be a starting point to determine appropriate levels of funding to stem driver activity. Ecofys also indicates that opportunity costs approach should complement efforts to address underlying drivers and enabling factors, including strengthening governance or bundling incentives [93]. In Xishangbanna, in an effort to protect forest resources, a large number of people have been forced to return farmland for reconversion to forestland. This has affected farmers’ incomes negatively, and thus, their enthusiasm for protecting forestry has decreased [94,95,96]. In view of this, the government should establish an effective connection mechanism between farmers returning farmland to forests and the market to resolve the ironic contradictions that farmers typically face in this regard. The government should also adopt a public expenditure policy to economically promote such conversions while expanding employment and raising farmers’ incomes.
- (7)
- Recently, restoration efforts in Xishuangbanna are increasingly being used to combat tropical rainforests loss. The Xishuangbanna government has implemented different ecological protection policies and measures at different stages of development. In 2007, the Forestry Development Plan of Xishuangbanna during the 11th Five-Year Plan was specially prepared according to national forestry laws and regulations. On 29 June 2018, the People’s Government of Yunnan Province enacted the Ecological Protection Red Line of Yunnan Province, which included three types of red lines, namely, biodiversity maintenance, water conservation, and water and soil conservation in 11 sub-regions. Among them, the ecological protection red line of tropical forest biodiversity maintenance at the southern border covered five prefectures and cities, including Xishuangbanna. In 2021, the People’s Government of Yunnan Province issued the Opinions on the Comprehensive Implementation of the Forest Chief System, which required strengthening the protection of ecological resources, accelerating the ecological restoration of forest and grassland resources, and deepening the reform in forest and grassland planning [97]. With the implementation of ecological protection policies in Xishuangbanna in recent years, the forest coverage of the whole region has increased to 81.34% in 2020, while the ecological environment has also been greatly improved [98].
- (8)
- Landsat-5 and Landsat-7 were operated from 1984 to 2013 and from 1999 to now, respectively. Due to the availability, accessibility and quality of Landsat data, satellite images of Landsat-5/7 TM and ETM+ from 1992, 1999, 2003, and 2007 were used to obtain information on land use changes. At present, the gradual aging of the sensor characteristics and the satellite’s orbit positioning accuracy may lead to a certain degree of decline in the radiation accuracy and geometric positioning accuracy for the current imageries of Landsat-5 and Landsat-7 [99]. The latest in-orbit Landsat-9 is equipped with the second-generation Land Imager (OLI-2) and the second-generation Thermal Infrared Imager (TIRS-2), which have improved the radiation resolution and SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) significantly [100,101,102]. Furthermore, Landsat-9 and Landsat-8 can be used for collaborative and complementary observation. Such temporal resolution of 8d can effectively promote the ecologically monitoring capability [103]. Therefore, in future studies Landsat data with higher temporal resolution and higher spatial resolution can contribute to improve the accuracy of the model in Xishuangbanna.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Noble, I.R.; Apps, M.J.; Houghton, R.A.; Lashof, D.A.; Makundi, W.; Muraiyarso, W.; Murray, B.; Sombroek, W. Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry. In Special Report of the IPCC; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Solomon, S.D.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Chen, Z.; Marquis, M.; Averyt, K.B.; Tignor, M.; Miller, H.L. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; ISBN 978-0521-88009-1. [Google Scholar]
- Bahir, M. Climate Change Effect on Groundwater Characteristics within Semi-Arid Zones from Western Morocco. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 11, 100380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gawith, D.; Hodge, I.; Morgan, F.; Daigneault, A. Climate change costs more than we think because people adapt less than we assume. Ecol. Econ. 2020, 173, 106636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, J.Y.; Xia, J.Y. Global patterns of the responses of leaf-level photosynthesis and respiration in terrestrial plants to experimental warming. J. Plant Ecol. 2013, 6, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, D.; Xia, J.; Wan, S. Climate warming and biomass accumulation of terrestrial plants: A meta-analysis. New Phytol. 2010, 188, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Achard, F.; Eva, H.D. Determination of Deforestation Rates of the World’s Humid Tropical Forests. Science 2002, 297, 999–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, H.; Ding, J.Q. Global Change Sharpens the Double-Edged Sword Effect of Aquatic Alien Plants in China and Beyond. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, X.L.; Fu, S.L. Forest Soil Profile Inversion and Mixing Change the Vertical Stratification of Soil CO2 Concentration without Altering Soil Surface CO2 Flux. Forests 2019, 10, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ramankutty, N.; Gibbs, H.K.; Achard, F.; DeFries, R.S.; Foley, J.A.; Houghton, R.A. Challenges to estimating carbon emissions fromtropical deforestation. Glob. Change Biol. 2007, 13, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagar, R.; Li, G.Y. Carbon fluxes and species diversity in grazed and fenced typical steppe grassland of Inner Mongolia, China. J. Plant Ecol. 2019, 12, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beymer-Farris, B.A.; Bassett, T.J. The REDD menace: Resurgent protectionism in Tanzania’s mangrove forests. Glob. Environ. Change 2012, 22, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korhonen-Kurki, K.; Sehring, J.; Brockhaus, M.; Gregorio, M.D. Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ plus in a context of weak governance. Clim. Policy 2014, 14, 167–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Danielsen, F.; Adrian, T.; Brofeldt, S.; van Noordwijk, M.; Poulsen, M.K.; Rahayu, S. Community monitoring for REDD+ plus: International promises and field realities. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roopsind, A.; Sohngen, B.; Brandt, J. Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 24492–24499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, X.; Ruan, J.; Juan, Z.; Shi, Y.; Wang, X.; Chan, F.T.S. Upstream-Downstream Joint Carbon Reduction Strategies Based on Low-Carbon Promotion. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Angelsen, A.; Brockhaus, M.; Kanninen, M.; Sills, E.; Sunderlin, W.D.; Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options (CIFOR); Center for International Forestry Research: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009; ISBN 978-6-02-869303-5. [Google Scholar]
- Angelsen, A.; Brockhaus, M.; Sunderlin, W.D.; Verchot, L.V. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices; Center for International Forestry Research: Bogor, Indonesia, 2012; pp. 69–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lu, H.L.; Liu, G.F.; Zhang, C.R.; Okuda, T. Approaches to Quantifying Carbon Emissions from Degradation in Pan-tropic Forests-Implications for Effective REDD Monitoring. Land Degrad. Dev. 2020, 31, 1890–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayrak, M.M.; Marafa, L.M. Ten Years of REDD+: A Critical Review of the Impact of REDD+ on Forest-Dependent Communities. Sustainability 2016, 8, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaimowitz, D.; Angelsen, A. Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A Review; Center for International Forestry Research: Bogor, Indonesia, 1998; p. 139. ISBN 979-8764-17-X. [Google Scholar]
- Luttrell, C.; Loft, L.; Gebara, M.F.; Kweka, D.; Brockhaus, M.; Angelsen, A.; Sunderlin, W.D. Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rey, D.; Roberts, J.; Korwin, S.; Rivera, L.; Ribet, U. A Guide to Understanding and Implementing the UNFCCC REDD+ Safeguards: A Review of Relevant International Law; Client Earth: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher, R.; Dressler, W.; Büscher, B.; Anderson, Z.R. Debating REDD+ and its implications: Reply to Angelsen et al. Conserv. Biol. 2017, 31, 721–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; White, A.; Lele, U. China’s Forest Tenure Reforms: Impacts and Implications for Choice, Conservation, and Climate Change. 2010. Available online: https://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwigspDd2KX7AhXazzgGHc3yB4gQFnoECA8QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Frightsandresources.org%2Fwp-content%2Fexported-pdf%2Fxu44whitelelechina39sforesttenurereformsreport.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3EauvorcoYxizfIMOi7wdR (accessed on 1 October 2022).
- Chelli, S.; Ottaviani, G.; Simonetti, E.; Wellstein, C.; Canullo, R.; Carnicelli, S.; Andreetta, A.; Puletti, N.; Bartha, S.; Cervellini, M.; et al. Climate is the main driver of clonal and bud bank traits in Italian forest understories. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2019, 40, 125478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitra, A. Salinity: A primary growth driver of mangrove forest. J. Sustain. Forest. 2018, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezende, C.L.; Fraga, J.S.; Sessa, J.C.; Souza, G.V.P.; Assad, E.D.; Scarano, F.R. Land use policy as a driver for climate change adaptation: A case in the domain of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Land Use Policy 2018, 72, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, L.; Li, J.; Ye, M.; Pu, R.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Q.; Feng, B.; Song, X. Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in a Coastal Zone of Zhejiang Province, China, during Rapid Urbanization. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Country Report; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Staal, A.; Flores, B.M.; Aguiar, A.P.D.; Bosmans, J.H.C.; Fetzer, I.; Tuinenburg, O.A. Feedback between drought and deforestation in the Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 044024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrante, L.; Fearnside, P.M. The Amazon’s road to deforestation. Science 2020, 369, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reydon, B.P.; Fernandes, V.B.; Telles, T.S. Land governance as a precondition for decreasing deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 2020, 94, 104313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bamwesigye, D.; Doli, A.; Hlaváková, P. REDD+: An Analysis of Initiatives in East Africa Amidst Increasing Deforestation. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 9, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelletier, J.; Ngoma, H.; Mason, N.M. Does smallholder maize intensification reduce deforestation? Evidence from Zambia. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2020, 63, 102127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurrochmat, D.R.; Boer, R.; Ardiansyah, M.; Immanuel, G.; Purwawangsa, H. Policy forum: Reconciling palm oil targets and reduced deforestation: Landswap and agrarian reform in Indonesia. For. Policy Econ. 2020, 119, 102291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, J.; Zhou, W.; De Sherbinin, A. Uncertainty in Estimates, Incentives, and Emission Reductions in REDD+ Projects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; Liu, G. Opportunity Costs of Carbon Emissions Stemming from Changes in Land Use. Sustainability 2015, 7, 3665–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, G.F.; Liu, Q.; Song, M.X.; Chen, J.S.; Zhang, C.R.; Meng, X.; Zhao, J.C.; Lu, H.L. Costs and Carbon Sequestration Assessment for REDD+ in Indonesia. Forests 2020, 11, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sommerfeld, A.; Senf, C.; Buma, B.; D’Amato, A.W.; Després, T.; Díaz-Hormazábal, I. Patterns and Drivers of Recent Disturbances across the Temperate Forest Biome. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Curtis, P.G.; Slay, C.M.; Harris, N.L.; Tyukavina, A.; Hansen, M.C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 2018, 361, 1108–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hosonuma, N.; Herold, M.; De Sy, V.; De Fries, R.S.; Brockhaus, M.; Verchot, L.; Angelsen, A.; Romijn, E. An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environ. Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 044009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson, A.M.; Soto, F. Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2008, 33, 213–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myers, N.R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; Mittermeier, G.A.B.; Dafonseca, J.K. Biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Z.-F.; Wong, G.; Cannon, C.H.; Xu, J.; Beckschäfer, P.; Swetnam, R.D. Can carbon-trading schemes help to protect China’s most diverse forest ecosystems? A case study from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan. Land Use Policy 2014, 38, 646–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.M.; Ma, Y.X.; Aide, T.M.; Liu, W.J. Past, present and future land-use in Xishuangbanna, China and the implications for carbon dynamics. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Dietz, T.; Carpenter, S.R.; Alberti, M.; Folke, C.; Moran, E.; Pell, A.N.; Deadman, P.; Kratz, T.; Lubchenco, J. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 2007, 317, 1513–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, G.F.; Feng, Y.F.; Xia, M.L.; Lu, H.L.; Guan, R.M.; Kazuhiro, H.; Zhang, C.R. Framework for Accounting Reference Levels for REDD+ in Tropical Forests: Case Study from Xishuangbanna, China. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, X.Y. Xishuangbanna Practice of Rubber Planting Ecological Restoration under the Concept of Ecological Civilization. Acad. Explor. 2021, 7, 72–78. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X. Preliminary Study on Regional Development. Friends Sci. 2012, 12, 133–134. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Z.N. Xishuangbanna Rubber Economy from the Perspective of Ecological Anthropology. Guangxi Ethn. Stud. 2012, 1, 140–148. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, P.S.; Zeng, L. Building Xishuangbanna Ecological Tea Garden Based on Resource Advantages. Yunnan Hot Crop Sci. Technol. 2002, 2, 23–25+22–35. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.W. Current Situation and Countermeasures of Tea Industry Development in Xishuangbanna Prefecture. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2012, 13, 338–346. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, L.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Li, H.; Xu, J.; Hyde, K.D.; Mortimer, P.E. A Survey of Termitomyces (L-yophyllaceae, Agaricales), Including a New Species, from a Subtropical Forest in Xishuangbanna, China. Mycobiology 2019, 47, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mani, S.; Cao, M. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentration in Leaf Litter and Soil in Xishaungbanna Tropical Forests: Does Precipitation Limitation Matter? Forests 2019, 10, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, S.H.; Wang, S.J. Effects of ant nesting on the spatiotemporal dynamics of soil easily oxidized organic carbon in Xishuangbanna tropical forests, China. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 30, 413–419. [Google Scholar]
- Goldberg, S.D.; Zhao, Y.; Harrison, R.D.; Monkai, J.; Li, Y.; Chau, K.; Xu, J. Soil respiration in sloping rubber plantations and tropical natural forests in Xishuangbanna, China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 249, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H. The tropical rainforest vegetation in Xishuangbanna. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2019, 2, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Zhu, H.; Li, B.G. A study on the tropical montane rainforest in Mengsong, Xishuangbanna’S.Yunnan. Search Life-Sci. Lit. 2001, 21, 303–314. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Zhu, H. A study on Anogeissus acuminate Community. Acta Bot. Yunnan 1990, 12, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
- Li, B.G.; Zhu, H.; Wang, H. The Bombax ceiba forest in Menghan, Xishuangbanna. Acta Bot. Yunnan 1993, 15, 191–195. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, H. Reclassification of monsoon tropical forests in southern Yunnan, Flora and Vegetation of Xishuangbanna SW China. Acta Phytoecol. Sin. 2005, 29, 170–174. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, H.; Cao, M.; Hu, H. Geological History, Flora, and Vegetation of Xishuangbanna, Southern Yunnan, China. Biotropica 2006, 38, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statistics Bureau of Yunnan Province. Yunnan Statistical Yearbook; China Statistics Press Co., Ltd.: Beijing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC. GoodPractice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/publication/good-practice-guidance-for-land-use-land-use-change-and-forestry/ (accessed on 10 July 2022).
- Zhang, X.Y.; Xu, Z.C.; Wang, X.N.; Song, W.W.; Qin, J.Q.; Hu, X.B.; Zhang, W.L.; Zou, J. Research on forest vegetation carbon stock dynamics and capacity of raising carbon sink in Xishuangbanna. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 20, 397–402. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.M.; Ma, Y.X.; Guo, Z.F.; Liu, W.J. Soil Organic Carbon Storage and Spatial Distribution Characteristics in Xishuangbanna. 2004 Annual Meeting of China Meteorological Society, Beijing, China. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 2006, 17, 1014–1018. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, Z.W.; Wang, L.J.; Miao, J.M.; Zhu, Z.X.; Wang, X.L.; Zheng, L.; Tang, J.W. Carbon storage of different tree-tea agroforestry systems in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province of Southwest China. Chin. J. Ecol. 2012, 31, 1617–1625. [Google Scholar]
- Pang, J.P. Carbon Storage and Its Allocation of Rubber Plantation in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Master’s Dissertation, Chinese Academy of Science (Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden), Yunnan, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Sha, L.Q. Carbon Storage and Soil CO2 Efflux of Tropical Seasonal Rain Forest, Rubber Tree Plantation and Paddy Soil in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Ph.D. Dissertation, Chinese Academy of Science (Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden), Yunnan, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, X.L.; Sun, B.; Zhou, H.Z.; Li, Z.P. Soil carbon stocks and their influencing factors under native vegetations in China. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2004, 41, 687–699. [Google Scholar]
- Forni, M.; Lippi, M. The Generalized Dynamic Factor Model: Representation Theory. Econom. Theory 2001, 17, 1113–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oja, E. Simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer. J. Math. Biol. 1982, 15, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jolliffe, I.T.; Cadima, J. Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2016, 374, 20150202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Long, J.S.; Ervin, L.H. Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model. Am. Stat. 2000, 54, 217–224. [Google Scholar]
- Hosmer, D.W.; Hosmer, T.; Cessie, S.L.; Lemeshow, S. A Compaison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat. Med. 1997, 16, 965–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B. Forest coverage rate and its dynamic change in Xishuangbanna. Yunnan For. Surv. Plan. 1984, 4, 9–13. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.Q.; Mammides, C.; Corlett, R.T. Reasons for the Survival of Tropical Forest Fragments in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Forests 2020, 11, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Min, S.; Bai, J.; Huang, J.; Waibel, H. Willingness of smallholder rubber farmers to participate in ecosystem protection: Effects of household wealth and environmental awareness. For. Policy Econ. 2018, 87, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.; Liu, W.; Cao, M. Impact of land use and land cover changes on ecosystem services in Menglun, Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 146, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibbs, H.K.; Ruesch, A.S.; Achard, F.; Clayton, M.K.; Holmgren, P. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. PNAS 2010, 107, 16732–16737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rudel, T.; Roper, J. Regional pattern and historical trend of tropical deforestation from 1976 to 1990: Qualitative comparative analysis. AMBIO. 1996, 25, 160–166. [Google Scholar]
- Chomitz, K.M. At Loggerheads?: Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests; The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, C.W.; Li, P.; Feng, Z.; Lin, Y.; You, Z.; Yang, Y. Mapping rubber plantations in Xishuangbanna, southwest China based on the re-normalization of two Landsat-based vegetation moisture indices and meteorological data. Geocarto Int. 2019, 36, 1923–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boucher, D.; Elias, P.; Lininger, K.; May-Tobin, C.; Roquemore, S.; Saxon, E. The Root of the Problem: What’s Driving Tropical Deforestation Today? Union of Concerned Scientists: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 3–11. [Google Scholar]
- Defries, R.S.; Rudel, T.; Uriarte, M.; Hansen, M. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat. Geosci. 2010, 3, 178–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, X.X.; Li, Y.E.; Gao, Q.Z.; Wan, Y.F.; Qin, X.B. Views and Responding Suggestions on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries. Adv. Clim. Change Res. 2010, 6, 65–69. [Google Scholar]
- Rademaekers, K.; Eichler, L.; Berg, J.; Obersteiner, M.; Havlik, P. Study on the Evolution of Some Deforestation Drivers and Their Potential Impacts on the Costs of an Avoiding Deforestation Scheme; ECORYS: Rotterdam, Netherlands; IIASA: Laxenburg, Austria, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Fisher, B.; Edwards, D.P. The high costs of conserving Southeast Asia’s lowland rainforests. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.H. Thinking on the Reform of China’s Forestry Management System. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 68–69+75. [Google Scholar]
- Lestrelin, G.; Castella, J.-C.; Li, Q.; Vongvisouk, T.; Tien, N.D.; Mertz, O. A Nested Land Uses–Landscapes–Livelihoods Approach to Assess the Real Costs of Land-Use Transitions: Insights from Southeast Asia. Land 2019, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gregersen, H.; El Lakany, H.; Karsenty, A.; White, A. Does the Opportunity Cost Approach Indicate the Real Cost of REDD+?: Rights and Realities of Paying for REDD+; Rights and Resources Initiative: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Ecofys. Testing methodologies for REDD+: Deforestation drivers, costs and reference levels. In Technical Report; UK Department of Energy and Climate Change: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, E.J.Z.; Somerville, S.; Albers, H.J. The economics of REDD through an incidence of burdens and benefits lens. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2019, 13, 165–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- West, T.A.P.; Grogan, K.A.; Swisher, M.E.; Caviglia-Harris, J.L.; Sills, E.; Harris, D. A hybrid optimiza-tion-agent-based model of REDD+ payments to households on an old deforestation frontier in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Model. Softw. 2018, 100, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heli, L.; Guifang, L. Distributed land use modeling and sensitivity analysis for REDD. Land Use Policy 2013, 33, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
- Portal of Yunnan Provincial People’s Government. Available online: http://www.yn.gov.cn/ (accessed on 21 May 2022).
- Portal of the People’s Government of Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture. Available online: https://www.xsbn.gov.cn/index.dhtml (accessed on 12 July 2022).
- Chander, G.; Helder, D.L.; Markham, B.L.; Dewald, J.D.; Kaita, E.; Thome, K.J.; Micijevic, E.; Ruggles, T.A. Landsat-5 TM reflective band absolute radio metric calibration. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2004, 42, 2747–2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, F.; Li, H.K. Interactive comparison of Landsat TM/OLI and HJ-1B CCD sensor data. Remote Sens. Inf. 2021, 36, 100–108. [Google Scholar]
- Masek, J.G.; Wulder, M.A.; Markham, B.; McCorkel, J.; Crawford, C.J.; Storey, J.; Jenstrom, D.T. Landsat 9: Empowering open science and applications through continuity. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 248, 111968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, C.; Xie, Y.; Huan, H. Cross calibration based on GF-1/WFV, MODIS and Landsat8 cameras. Mod. Electron. Technol. 2019, 42, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, J.D.; Ma, Z.G.; Wu, Z.H. Landsat 9 Satellite Image Preprocessing Method and Its Application: A Case Study of Nanjing Vegetation Ecological Remote Sensing Monitoring. Straits Sci. 2022, 5, 3–7+28. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.M.; Ma, Y.X.; Liu, W. Clearance and fragmentation of tropical rain forest in Xishaungbanna, SW, China. Biodivers. Conserv. 2009, 18, 3421–3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.A.; Liu, W.J.; Jiang, X.J.; Wang, P.; Li, W. Effects of land-use changes on runoff and sediment yield: Implications for soil conservation and forest management in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 2962–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Number | Type | Driving Factors (Units) |
---|---|---|
I | Population | V1: Total population at the end of the year (ten-thousand persons) V2: Non-agricultural population (ten-thousand persons) V3: Rural labor force (persons) V4: Number of employees in agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fisheries (persons) |
II | Economic development | V5: GDP * (ten-thousand Yuan) V6: GDP of the primary industries (ten-thousand Yuan) V7: Revenue (ten-thousand Yuan) V8: Fiscal expenditure (ten-thousand Yuan) V9: Total retail sales of social goods (ten-thousand Yuan) V10: Investment in fixed assets (ten-thousand Yuan) V11: Highway mileage (km) |
III | Living standards | V12: Year-end balance of savings deposits of urban and rural residents (ten-thousand Yuan) V13: Per capita net income of farmers (Yuan/person) |
IV | Agricultural development level | V14: Total agricultural net output value (ten-thousand Yuan) V15: Net output value of planting industry (ten-thousand Yuan) V16: Forestry net output value (ten-thousand Yuan) V17: Animal husbandry net output value (ten-thousand Yuan) V18: Net fishery output value (ten-thousand Yuan) V19: Gross agricultural output (ten-thousand Yuan) V20: Sown area of main crops ** (ha) V21: Returning farmland to forests (ten-thousand mu) V22: Rubber production (t) V23: Tea production (100 kg) V24: Food production (t) |
V | Agricultural technological progress | V25: Rural electricity consumption (ten thousand kWh) V26: Fertilizer application (scalar t) |
Land Use Type | Soil Carbon Density | Vegetation Carbon Density | Total Carbon Density | Source of Data |
---|---|---|---|---|
Forestland | 99.57 | 45.30211 | 144.8721 | ZhangXiuyu, Li Hongmei et al. [66,67] |
Shrub | 109.2 | 9.534 | 118.734 | ZhangXiuyu, Li Hongmei et al. [66,67] |
Tea plantations | 20.662 | 12.1768 | 32.8388 | Xiao Ziwei [68] |
Rubber plantations | 104.7 | 66.79645 | 171.4965 | Pang Jiaping, ShaLiqinget al. [69,70] |
wild grassland | 60.6 | 4.935 | 65.535 | Zhang Xiuyu, XieXianli et al. [66,71] |
paddy fields | 103 | 0 | 103 | ShaLiqinget al. [70] |
dry land | 61.9 | 0 | 61.9 | XieXianli et al. [71] |
Composition | Eigenvalue | Contribution Rate (%) | Cumulative Contribution Rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 18.940 | 72.845 | 72.845 |
2 | 2.881 | 11.081 | 83.925 |
3 | 1.828 | 7.030 | 90.955 |
4 | 1.087 | 4.181 | 95.136 |
Socio-Economic Driving Factors | Composition | Socio-Economic Driving Factors | Composition | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
V1 | 0.881 | 0.055 | −0.437 | −0.114 | V14 | 0.976 | −0.026 | 0.018 | 0.125 |
V2 | 0.851 | −0.192 | 0.264 | −0.24 | V15 | 0.719 | 0.075 | −0.66 | −0.144 |
V3 | 0.939 | −0.288 | 0.16 | 0.004 | V16 | 0.938 | −0.24 | −0.046 | 0.159 |
V4 | 0.931 | −0.318 | 0.131 | −0.01 | V17 | 0.595 | 0.72 | 0.227 | −0.137 |
V5 | 0.987 | −0.059 | 0.075 | −0.004 | V18 | 0.83 | 0.345 | 0.142 | −0.262 |
V6 | 0.975 | 0.107 | −0.061 | 0.115 | V19 | 0.907 | 0.031 | −0.406 | −0.046 |
V7 | 0.742 | 0.245 | 0.377 | 0.103 | V20 | 0.005 | 0.929 | 0.262 | 0.105 |
V8 | 0.966 | −0.197 | 0.079 | −0.06 | V21 | 0.663 | 0.124 | −0.202 | 0.689 |
V9 | 0.991 | −0.051 | 0.056 | −0.002 | V22 | 0.727 | 0.288 | 0.119 | 0.466 |
V10 | 0.819 | 0.125 | −0.519 | −0.061 | V23 | 0.948 | 0.17 | −0.184 | 0.026 |
V11 | 0.803 | −0.415 | 0.377 | −0.088 | V24 | 0.449 | 0.748 | −0.075 | −0.309 |
V12 | 0.985 | −0.135 | 0.035 | 0.01 | V25 | 0.957 | −0.187 | 0.163 | −0.027 |
V13 | 0.939 | 0.093 | 0.295 | −0.037 | V26 | 0.964 | −0.197 | −0.013 | −0.158 |
Land Use Types | Regression Equation | R2 | VIF | p-Value | RMSE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
forestland | 0.902 | 1.000 | 0.015 | 0.002 | |
shrub | 0.811 | 1.000 | 0.024 | 0.001 | |
dry land | 0.914 | 1.000 | 0.019 | 0.003 | |
paddy fields | 0.801 | 1.000 | 0.035 | 0.002 | |
rubber plantations | 0.852 | 1.000 | 0.009 | 0.002 | |
tea plantations | 0.831 | 1.000 | 0.041 | 0.001 | |
wild grassland | 0.752 | 1.000 | 0.009 | 0.002 | |
construction land | 0.803 | 1.000 | 0.017 | 0.003 | |
other land | 0.821 | 1.000 | 0.035 | 0.002 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, G.; Li, J.; Ren, L.; Lu, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C. Identification of Socio-Economic Impacts as the Main Drivers of Carbon Stocks in China’s Tropical Rainforests: Implications for REDD+. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214891
Liu G, Li J, Ren L, Lu H, Wang J, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Zhang C. Identification of Socio-Economic Impacts as the Main Drivers of Carbon Stocks in China’s Tropical Rainforests: Implications for REDD+. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(22):14891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214891
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Guifang, Jie Li, Liang Ren, Heli Lu, Jingcao Wang, Yaxing Zhang, Cheng Zhang, and Chuanrong Zhang. 2022. "Identification of Socio-Economic Impacts as the Main Drivers of Carbon Stocks in China’s Tropical Rainforests: Implications for REDD+" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 22: 14891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214891
APA StyleLiu, G., Li, J., Ren, L., Lu, H., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., & Zhang, C. (2022). Identification of Socio-Economic Impacts as the Main Drivers of Carbon Stocks in China’s Tropical Rainforests: Implications for REDD+. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214891