Next Article in Journal
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Perceived Stress, Well-Being and Their Relations with Work-Related Behaviours among Hong Kong School Leaders during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
“So, if she wasn’t aware of it, then how would everybody else out there be aware of it?”—Key Stakeholder Perspectives on the Initial Implementation of Self-Collection in Australia’s Cervical Screening Program: A Qualitative Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Spatial Effect of Air Pollution Governance on Labor Productivity: Evidence from 262 Chinese Cities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 23
10.3390/ijerph192315774
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

China’s Trade of Agricultural Products Drives Substantial Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15774; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315774
by Zheng Meng 1, Jinling Guo 1, Kejia Yan 2, Zhuan Yang 1, Bozi Li 1, Bo Zhang 2,* and Bin Chen 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Cunyi Yang
Reviewer 3:
Guofeng Wang
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15774; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315774
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 20 November 2022 / Accepted: 24 November 2022 / Published: 27 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in Air Pollution and Human Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

First, I would like to mention that, in my opinion, the theme, current content and analysis of the manuscript are indirectly and partially related to the scope of the journal in the field of environment aspect and public health. In my opinion, the manuscript of “China’s Agricultural Product Trade Drives Substantial Green-House Gas Emissions” has done a lot of work, and the research conclusion is of practical significance. 

Second, in my view, the topic is interesting, and the authors’ research is valuable; however, it contains several shortcomings and inaccuracies that should be eliminated and solved before further processing the manuscript.

(1) In 2020, China has put forward the goal of dual carbon, meanwhile，international trade frictions have been intensifying in recent years. The author also mentioned in the manuscript. But, the data used in this paper comes from the 1995-2015 China Customs Statistics Yearbook, this data is relatively old, whether the research conclusions can accurately represent the current situation, whether the data can be updated.

(2) The manuscript reflects the author's sufficient workload, has done a lot of measurement work, but the conclusion of the paper is slightly insufficient. I suggest that the author should make more discussion on the application value of the achievements and   supplementing the trend of agricultural trade between different countries and adjusting trade policies in a timely manner.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Minor revision, please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper is well reading and contain some meaningful results, some suggestions to improve the quality.

1. Why use data from 1995-2015, as it's 2022, it maybe no meaning for nowadays

2.Figure 1 and 2 contain too many information and I suggest divide these figures

3.Which GHG emission  is caculated? CO2, CH4, N2O, or other emission? the author should give out in this paper

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The author have solved all the questions and problems

Back to TopTop