Next Article in Journal
Paediatric Cutaneous Warts and Verrucae: An Update
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Zumba Fitness® on Respiratory Function and Body Composition Parameters: An Eight-Week Intervention in Healthy Inactive Women
Previous Article in Journal
COMSI®—A Form of Treatment That Offers an Opportunity to Play, Communicate and Become Socially Engaged through the Lens of Nature—A Single Case Study about an 8-Year-Old Boy with Autism and Intellectual Disability
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 24
10.3390/ijerph192416398
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Motives and Barriers Affecting the Participation of Polish People in the Physical Activity of Nordic Walking

by
Andrzej Soroka
1,
Agnieszka Godlewska
1,* and
Anna Mazurek-Kusiak
2
1
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, B. Prusa 14 st., 08-110 Siedlce, Poland
2
Department of Tourism and Recreation, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 15, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(24), 16398; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416398
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 1 December 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical Activity, Weight Loss and Primary Care)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of the study was to identify motives and barriers which have the greatest influence on participation in Nordic Walking (NW) of people with normal body weight and persons who are either overweight or obese (according to their BMI). In the study, the modified Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS) was used, which was designed to measure adult physical activity (PA) motivation. PALMS measures eight motives for participation in PA, on a 5-point Likert scale. The study was conducted during a NW competition and during training sessions of its participants. Two groups of respondents were taken into account: the first group with those with normal body weight and the second group with those who were overweight or obese. Respondents with normal body weight were more frequent participants of NW sessions. Enhanced body capacity, concern for one’s health, improved body shape and lifespan extension were major motives of practicing NW. Polish people perceive PA as a means of improving the quality of life due to enhanced health and wellbeing. Subjects with normal body weight tended to mention lack of areas suitable for NW and lack of time due to professional work. Overweight or obese persons pointed to other types of PA, shyness and lack of time.

1. Introduction

In recent years, Nordic Walking (NW) has become an increasingly popular form of PA [1,2,3], also in Poland [4]. NW refers to Scandinavian walking with poles, or in other words a physical activity based on walking and a special technique of pushing off with a special type of pole [5].
NW combines rehabilitation and recreational or sports activities undertaken by people of all ages.
Undoubtedly, the growing popularity of this type of PA is associated with uncomplicated structure of movement that occurs during walking, as well as with the possibility of taking part it in a green environment. Current studies have shown that walking is a popular form of PA [6,7]. This is due to the fact that this form is comfortable and overcomes many widely perceived barriers to PA such as lack of time, lack of physical fitness or technical skills [8,9].
NW is based on basic forms of human PA such as walking, marching and running [10]. NW is practiced with well-designed ergonomic poles. The main purpose of the use of the poles is the involvement of upper limb muscles to produce ground reaction forces resulting in an increased energy expenditure [11,12].
NW is the activity which turns out to be simple and suitable for almost everyone [13]. This sports activity is recommended for both healthy people and those diagnosed with civilization diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, diseases of musculoskeletal system and cardiovascular system [14].
The studies conducted so far have shown that NW provides many health and fitness benefits at the physiological level, in addition to being an important form of PA from a psychological point of view [15,16]. Walking as a form of active movement can be characterized by greater long-term stability than even cycling [17]. When practicing NW, physical injuries do not occur as often as in other forms of physical recreation [18].
Taking into account participation in NW activities, it is worth realizing what really motivates individuals of different ages, health or approach to PA to participate in such activities. It must be acknowledged that the motivation which appears in many areas of human life, including those related to PA, is one of the most important psychological concepts in modern times [19]. The motives for participation in physical activities or performing activities related to daily needs of education and work, in particular those connected with sport and life quality, are becoming increasingly important for people. Motivation plays a particularly important role in sport and activities related to PA. This is due to the fact that being fit and performing PA is not an obligation but rather a personal goal resulting, among others, from enjoyment [20].
The literature on the subject includes many works reporting research which included age, gender and education of people taking up NW [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. However, there is little research on participants who are overweight, obese, and have normal body weight [29,30].
The objective of the study was to identify motives and barriers which have the greatest influence on participation in NW of people with normal body weight as well as persons who are either overweight or obese (according to their BMI). In the work, the following terms suggested by WHO (2000) [31] and pertaining to international classification of adults based on body mass index were used: normal body weight, overweight and obese.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The study was conducted in April and October 2019 during NW sports and recreational competitions and during training sessions of the participants. The NW events were part of the cyclic Korona Polski (Crown of Poland) competition. It was divided into 4 parts: the Crown of West, the Crown of East, the Crown of North and the Crown of South. Prior to each event, participants were asked to fill in a questionnaire which included three questions pertaining to the frequency of participation in NW classes, and motives and barriers affecting participation in NW training. Motives were divided into: 13 health-related motives, of which 10 motives entered the model of discriminant function, 7 social motives, all of them entering the model, and 14 motives resulting from the desire to compete, only 2 of which entered the model.
Eight questionnaires were completed by persons individually practicing NW. The methodological procedure allowed for the calculation of the size of survey sample, with the confidence level of 0.95, the estimated fraction 0.50 and the maximum error 0.03. The size of the survey sample was 1066 respondents selected from the entire adult population of Poland. There were 1146 surveys conducted, of which 76 were rejected due to errors.
The survey sample was selected taking into account gender and age. Men constituted 47.88% of the population surveyed, while women were 52.12%. Respondents aged 18–24 constituted 12.20% of all the subjects, those aged from 25 to 39 amounted to 30.20%, between 40 and 54 constituted 24.80% and those aged 55 and over constituted 32.80%.
The average number of respondents, age, height, weight, and BMI values are given in Table 1, divided into two groups, that is normal body weight, and overweight and obese.
The study conforms to the code of ethics of the World Medical Association and the standards for research involving human subjects set out in the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the local university ethics committee.

2.2. Study Groups

The study included two groups of respondents: individuals with normal body weight and overweight or obese subjects. The separation of the respondents into two groups was based on body mass index (BMI). BMI was used due to the fact that it is easiest to take measurements under the conditions of a sporting competition. In 2000, the World Health Organization (WHO), defined overweight as having a body mass index (BMI) of 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, and obesity as having a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2 [32] (Table 2). BMI has never been a perfect index for children because it correlates with height. However, it has been accepted to refer to overweight and obesity in children to the cut-off points for adults [33]. This is the underlying reason why a group consisting of 18–20-year-olds was not considered in the study.
Height and body weight were examined using the Charder U130B Body Composition Analyzer synced to the Charder Proscan application. The obtained measurements were reported in kilograms correct to one decimal point for body weight, and in centimeters with zero places after the decimal point for body height. The measurements were taken immediately before respondents completed the questionnaire.
Normal body weight was considered to be between 18.5 and 24.99. Respondents with BMI below this value, i.e., people who were underweight or emaciated were not included in the study. The group with excessive weight and first-degree obesity had body mass index values ranging from 25.00 to 34.99. The study did not include respondents with second degree obesity, i.e., with an index value of at least 35.00, due to lack of respondents from this group participating in recreational competitions and training.

2.3. Data Collection

In the study, we administered the Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS), which was designed to measure adult PA motivation. PALMS measures eight motives for participation in PA, namely mastery, enjoyment, psychological condition, physical condition, appearance, others’ expectations, affiliation, competition/ego, on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) [36,37,38].
A Likert scale is a rating system applied in questionnaires which yields knowledge as to the degree of acceptance of a given phenomenon or view, or which measures attitudes towards specific influences, behavior, projects or problems [39,40].
PALMS was modified to meet the needs of the current research. Motives were divided into three groups: health-related, social and competition-related. In the groups, both intrinsic (mastery and enjoyment) motivation and extrinsic (the remaining six factors) motivation aspects occurred. The question pertaining to motives was divided into health motives with 13 response options, social motives with 14 responses and those resulting from a willingness to compete with 6 response options.
The PALMS was validated in previous studies [36,37,38,41]. Having been modified to accommodate the requirements of the present study, PALMS met the conditions of suitability, pertinence and reliability.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

STATISTICA 13 PL (TIBCO Software, PaloAlto, CA, USA) software and discriminant function were used to conduct statistical analysis. Discriminant analysis is a statistical method used to examine differences between two groups (such as in the study reported here) by a simultaneous analysis of several variables to find out which variables are the greatest contributors to group discrimination. Classification of cases is one of the main goals behind an application of discriminant analysis.
The applied classification function is based on a linear combination of discriminant variables. There were two functions, the same number as the number of groups. They are used to determine to which group a given case belongs. Multidimensional normality was examined before testing, checking each variable for normality of distribution. We used the Kołmogorow-Smirnow test which verified the hypothesis that two samples were taken from different populations. Due to a large number of individuals in each group, slight deviations were of little importance [42].
It was assumed that the variances of the variables were homogeneous in particular groups. The variance matrix was not taken into account due to the large numbers of respondents in individual groups. Statistical significance was defined as those differences for which the probability of randomness was less than p < 0.05.

3. Results

While analyzing the motives of Polish people engaging in NW as their main PA, attempts were made to determine the frequency of their participation in such PA. The analysis of discriminant function, especially its classification function, showed that persons with normal body weight more frequently declared their participation in NW when classes were attended every day or three times per week. For the latter statement, classification function reached the highest value for respondents who were overweight or obese. The significant difference between the values occurred at p < 0.001. Overweight and obese respondents more often declared doing occasional PA, at p < 0.001. The created discriminant function model did not include such declarations as participation in classes once a week or participation during spring and summer (Table 3).
While analyzing motives that had the greatest impact on decisions about the participation of Polish people in NW, the low values of Wilks’ lambda index appeared in the group of health-related motives, compared to social motives, especially motives resulting from the willingness to compete. These were values close to zero, which proved their significance. Undoubtedly, the most important health-oriented motive was the improvement of physical fitness. In both groups, the classification function reached the highest values. Among respondents with normal body weight, this value was significantly higher, at p < 0.001, than among overweight and obese respondents.
The same dependency, also at p < 0.001, was found for the factor related to health concern. An important motive, especially among Polish people who were overweight or obese, was a desire to improve their body shape. In this case, the value of classification function indicated high significance, at p < 0.001, compared to the one calculated in the group of respondents with normal body weight.
No significant differences appeared between the examined groups of respondents as to classification function values which related to the motive associated with lifespan extension. This motive was very important for both groups of respondents; thus, it demonstrated high values of classification function.
For respondents with normal body weight, motives related to an opportunity to affect their bodies, improve their physical condition and the willingness to stay in the open air were significantly more important, at p < 0.001.
For other motives which were included in the discriminant function model, significantly higher averages were found for the group of respondents who were overweight and obese, all at p < 0.001. These were the desire to improve physical condition, improving the quality of life and treating NW as a form of rehabilitation after illness. This shows the appropriate attitude given their health condition.
Taking into account social motives, the most important is the desire to improve self-esteem, which is the result of self-care in the sense of proper functioning in society. Such an approach is related to the fact that not being overweight can improve self-esteem of respondents participating in such classes. It also involves the desire to escape from everyday problems and worries.
The desire to improve self-esteem is associated with motives related to reducing the feeling of shame, experiencing a sense of fulfilment thanks to NW classes and affiliation to a group of active people. It should be noted, however, that these motives, to a much larger extent, relate to the group of respondents with normal body weight.
Motives resulting from the desire to compete concerned the overcoming of one’s physical weaknesses and, to a lesser extent, the possibility of competing with others. As in the case of psychosocial motives, the classification function reached higher values in the group of respondents with a normal body weight. It seems that in this group there is not only the desire to look good, the need to be healthy or to have improved physical capacity, but it is also important to overcome one’s own adversities. The willingness to compete with peers or opponents was also an important motive (Table 4).
A lack of areas to practice this form of recreation was the most important barrier for people with normal body weight. This reason was significantly higher in this group of respondents, at p < 0.001, than among respondents who were overweight and obese.
Similar dependencies occurred in the case of barriers (Table 5) that concerned the lack of free time resulting from devoting one’s time to professional work and one’s own laziness. Significant differences in relation to overweight and obese respondents occurred at p <0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively. It should be noted that the classification function achieved a high value in the group of respondents with overweight and obesity, where the main barrier was associated with the participation in other PA. This difference was significant at p = 0.022. It is a positive attitude towards one’s body within this group of respondents. The results indicate that, for the majority of respondents, NW is one of many forms of PA they undertake.

4. Discussion

The objective of the study was to ascertain the most important motives and barriers which have the greatest impact on participation in NW classes of people with normal body weight as well as persons who are overweight or obese.
Before deciding on the work’s objectives, the frequency of NW practice was determined for both groups of subjects. Respondents with normal body weight were found to engage in NW almost twice as often, that is every day or at least three times per week, unlike overweight or obese people. Undeniably, the lower PA level of this group contributes to their higher body weight [43], which translates into poorer parameters of physical health [44,45] and mental health [46,47] as well as increased mortality of overweight and obese individuals [48,49] compared with people with healthy body weight.
Research has demonstrated that even participation of overweight and obese persons in the PA of NW, is an important factor affecting human health [50,51] as walking has been confirmed to be the preferred choice of overweight and obese persons [52,53]. A likely reason is that this PA form does not require any special physical abilities, equipment or place in addition to being easily incorporated into everyday routine [54]. Moreover, NW poles improve stride stability, which is of particular significance for overweight or obese people [55,56]. It should be noted that excessive weight/obesity is the main reason of people with this problem not taking up PA [57,58].
The obtained study results demonstrated that respondents with normal body size regularly participate in NW classes, which undoubtedly results in preservation of healthy body weight and good shape whereas lower participation levels contribute to excessive weight and fat accumulation.
Research revealed that health-oriented motives were the most important stimuli for respondents. It was particularly evident for people with a normal body shape as they pointed to motives associated with improved physical body efficiency and concern for their health. The results confirmed previous findings by Gavin et al. [59], who reported health benefits as the dominant motive behind taking up NW. In other work, nearly half of respondents (48%) pointed to health benefits and improved physical condition as the most important motives of starting NW [60]. In addition, a positive approach to one’s body and health has been indicated in research by Nelson et al. [61], whose participants pointed to improved health and well-being as their reasons behind attending NW sessions. Breyer et al. [62] demonstrated that this is a particular concern of elderly people who concentrate on the benefits of improved health and physical condition resulting from their participation in NW classes. NW is commonly viewed as the PA that is recommended for elderly people [7], which has been found in an increasing number of studies reporting an enhanced physical condition and fitness of elderly persons, even those practicing NW at irregular intervals [11,12,63]. Thus, it can be inferred that a large percentage of respondents knowingly pay attention to advantages resulting from NW, and decide to take it up as part of their everyday routine. Improved health and fitness are highlighted as major motives of engaging in sports and recreation practice [64,65].
Concern for one’s health and lifespan extension are important motives present in both the surveyed groups. Regular PA/NW contributes to a reduced occurrence of cardiovascular diseases, stroke following venous thromboembolism, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis, obesity, colon cancer, breast cancer, anxiety and depression [59,61].
Additionally, the need to improve one’s body shape, including weight reduction, was a particular motive of overweight and obese people whereas persons with normal body weight pointed to having the chance to influence one’s body. The results reported here concur with the findings of Ryan and Deci [66] who pointed out that PA, including NW, often results from the desire to lose weight and reduce body weight. It has been confirmed that physically active persons are more involved in doing exercise if they treat PA as factor influencing their outward appearance [67,68]. It is also important that people exercising in groups, that is in an organized way, pay more attention to an attractive appearance, good figure and the chance to control one’s body than social motives or enjoyment-seeking ones [69,70].
Appearance is associated with body weight control which was particularly emphasized by overweight and obese people [71,72] who claimed that this was one of their main motives of doing PA [73]. This is an appropriate approach which, however, often predominates after body size parameters are excessively high pointing to excessive weight or even obesity.
For overweight and obese people, physical condition improvement, enhanced quality of life as well as NW as a rehabilitation measure after illness are important motives as well. It is enhanced physical condition in the group of overweight or obese people that was emphasized as the second motive, in terms of their value, in research by Jakicic et al. [74]. Improved fitness may be achieved by more frequent participation in PA of overweight and obese persons.
Research by Siegel et al. [75] demonstrated that exercising in natural surrounding and a green environment has a definitely more beneficial effect on the mood of participants, and contributes to reduced stress levels and improved prospects of social interaction. As a rule, people with higher social interaction levels are in better health compared with socially inactive people, which is indicative of the first group’s appropriate approach to their health. The results have shown that, in this group, respondents were aware of their physical capabilities, which are undoubtedly associated with their quality of life.
As far as social motives were concerned, the foremost motive was the desire to improve one’s self-esteem—the concern for oneself as part of the society. Such an approach results from the fact that an attractive appearance and acceptance of other people contribute to an improved self-esteem of the participant of such classes. Additionally, being able to escape from everyday problems and worries seems to be an important motive as confirmed in the studies by Gavin et al. [59] and Clifford et al. [71]. Additionally, the authors point to the importance of support provided by the nearest community members. A significant factor was also altered decision-related balance by creating in people the conviction that exercising may be a means of personal fulfilment by being part of an elite group of active people [76].
The need to improve self-esteem is associated with motives related to reducing the sense of shame, enhancing personal fulfilment by attending NW classes and affiliation to a group of active people [77,78]. However, it should be noted that these motives were much more relevant for respondents with normal body weight. One can infer that for them these determinants were a natural notion which contributed to normal existence whereas overweight or obese subjects found them difficult. A feeling of fulfilment and pride arising from participation in PA sessions led to increased wellbeing and escape from everyday worries for people with normal body size [79,80,81].
Social motives behind practicing NW include an improved quality of life, better stress management as well as enhanced self-esteem and ability to function in the community [82,83]. PA provides participants with a sense of purposefulness, identity and belonging to a given social group [84,85].
Motives rooted in the willingness to compete were twofold: overcoming one’s physical weaknesses and, to a lesser extent, opportunities of challenging other people. These motives either lead to or sustain the need to practice PA [86]. This is indicative of the fact that respondents in both surveyed groups not only wanted to look good, be healthy and have improved physical capabilities but also wanted to overcome their own barriers or weaknesses, which seemed to be a prominent reason for starting NW [87].
While determining motives behind respondents’ practicing the PA of NW, one cannot ignore barriers to doing this form of exercise. Subjects with normal body weight mentioned lack of suitable areas and lack of time. The same obstacles were mentioned in the works by Pan et al. [88] and Martínez de Quel et al. [89] who particularly pointed to landscape barriers encountered by NW. One’s laziness resulting from lack of motivation to do NW was more often mentioned by persons with normal body size, which disagrees with findings reported by Arango et al. [90] as well as Sharifi et al. [91] who claimed that that was more of a problem for overweight people and female subjects. Moreover, these authors pointed out that lack of time to do PA was another important barrier, the finding reported elsewhere, too [92]. It is recommended that the decision to take up PA should be coupled with careful scheduling of the sessions so as to incorporate them as part of an everyday routine [65,93].
A barrier caused by shyness was more pronounced for overweight or obese people. It was excessive weight that was the source of this shyness in this group of subjects. It has also been demonstrated that physically active people are more determined and confident whereas a lower level of PA is found for people who are more timid and less confident [94].

5. Conclusions

Respondents with normal body weight were more frequent participants of NW sessions which indicates that this factor had the greatest effect on their weight/height ratio, as confirmed in numerous studies on excessive weight and obesity in human population.
Enhanced body capacity, concern for one’s health, improved body shape and lifespan extension were the major motives of practicing NW. It was exhibited in both surveyed groups, which is indicative of the fact that the purpose of PA performed during sessions is to ensure proper body functioning and a good quality of life.
Physically active persons with normal body weight pointed to the fact that NW classes improved their self-esteem, provided them with a break from daily worries, gave them a feeling of pride and reduced their sense of shame. To a lesser extent, these motives were mentioned by overweight or obese respondents.
NW classes turned out to be one of many forms of PA taken up by Polish people, which is a positive fact as it indicates that Polish people perceive PA as a means of improving the quality of life due to enhanced health and wellbeing.
Barriers to engaging in NW differed significantly between the surveyed groups. Subjects with normal body weight tended to mention lack of areas suitable for NW and lack of time due to professional work whereas overweight or obese persons pointed out other reasons such as doing other types of PA, shyness and lack of time.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and A.G.; methodology, A.S. and A.G.; validation, A.S. and A.G.; formal analysis, A.S. and A.G.; investigation, A.S. and A.G.; resources, A.S. and A.G.; data curation, A.S. and A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S., A.G. and A.M.-K.; writing—review and editing, A.S, A.G. and A.M.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The results of the research carried out under the research theme No. 7/19/B were financed from the science grant granted by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee To ensure confidentiality, all data were anonymized before analysis. Before the respondents started to answer the questions posed in the study, they declared their willingness to participate in the study. Acceptance was provided online. The [informed] written consent to participate in the study was obtained from all respondents.

Informed Consent Statement

The study participants were informed that the findings of the study would be published. Identifying images or clinical details of participants that compromise anonymity were not applicable in this manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mathieson, S.; Lin, C.W. Health benefits of nordic walking: A systematic review. Br. J. Sports Med. 2014, 48, 1577–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ossowski, Z.; Liedtke, E.; Siemieniuk, K.; Szydłowska, S.; Sakowski, P.; Skrobot, W. Influence of Nordic walking training on muscle strenght and the electromyographic activity of the lower body in women with low bone mass. Polish J. Sport Tour. 2016, 23, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Grainer, A.; Zerbini, L.; Reggiani, C.; Marcolin, G.; Steele, J.; Pavei, G.; Paoli, A. Physiological and Perceptual Responses to Nordic Walking in a Natural Mountain Environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Piech, K.; Raczyńska, B. Nordic walking—A versatile physical activity. Polish J. Sport Tour. 2010, 17, 69–78. [Google Scholar]
  5. Piech, K.; Piech, J.; Grants, J. Nordic Walking—A Versatile Physical Activity Fit for Everyone (A Literature Review). J. Sports Sci. 2014, 5, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mansi, S.; Al Khaldi, H.M. Physical Activity Management and its Role for Health Benefits. Int. J. Health Sci. 2015, 3, 95–107. [Google Scholar]
  7. Takeshima, N.; Islam, M.M.; Rogers, M.E.; Rogers, N.L.; Sengoku, N.; Koizumi, D.; Kitabayashi, Y.; Imai, A.; Naruse, A. Effects of nordic walking compared to conventional walking and band-based resistance exercise on fitness in older adults. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2013, 12, 422–430. [Google Scholar]
  8. Knapik, A.; Saulicz, E.; Mysliwiec, A.; Saulicz, M.; Warmuz-Wancisiewicz, A. Motivations and effects of practicing Nordic walking by elderly people. Balt. J. Health Phys. Act. 2014, 6, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mansour, K.B.; Gorce, P.; Rezzoug, N. The impact of Nordic walking training on the gait of the elderly. J. Sports Sci. 2018, 36, 2368–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Skórkowska-Telichowska, K.; Kropielnicka, K.; Bulińska, K.; Pilch, U.; Woźniewski, M.; Szuba, A.; Jasiński, R. Nordic walking in the second half of life. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2016, 28, 1035–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, H.S.; Park, J.H. Effects of Nordic walking on physical functions and depression in frail people aged 70 years and above. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2015, 27, 2453–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Bullo, V.; Gobbo, S.; Vendramin, B.; Duregon, F.; Cugusi, L.; Di Blasio, A.; Bocalini, D.S.; Zaccaria, M.; Bergamin, M.; Ermolao, A. Nordic Walking can be incorporated in the exercise prescription to increase aerobic capacity, strength and quality of life for elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rejuvenation Res. 2018, 21, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tschentscher, M.; Niederseer, D.; Niebauer, J. Health benefits of Nordic Walking: A systematic review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 44, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Morso, L.; Hartvigsen, J.; Puggaard, L.; Manniche, C. Nordic Walking and chronic low back pain: Design of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2006, 7, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Hartig, N. Psychological benefits of walking: Moderation by company and outdoor environment. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 2011, 3, 261–280. [Google Scholar]
  16. Holtermann, A.; Marott, J.L.; Gyntelberg, F.; Søgaard, K.; Suadicani, P.; Mortensen, O.S.; Prescott, E.; Schnohr, P. Does the benefit on survival from leisure time physical activity depend on physical activity at work? A prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hemmingsson, E.; Uddén, J.; Neovius, M.; Ekelund, U.; Rössner, S. Increased physical activity in abdominally obese women through support for changed commuting habits: A randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Obes. 2009, 33, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tudor-Locke, C.; Craig, C.L.; Brown, W.J.; Clemes, S.A.; De Cocker, K.; Giles-Corti, B.; Blair, S.N. How many steps/day are enough? for adults. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2011, 8, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, X.M.; Bartol, K.M. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad. Manag. J. 2010, 53, 107–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Piščalkienė, V.; Gintilienė, M.; Misiūnas, D.; Kool, H.; Siik, J.; Muraus, P.; Juhna, M.; Miķele, I.; Kristensen, R. Motivation and physical activity types: Comparative analysis. Health Sci. East. Eur. 2018, 28, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Caperchione, C.M.; Vandelanotte, C.; Kolt, G.S.; Duncan, M.; Ellison, M.; George, E.; Mummery, W.K. What a man wants: Understanding the challenges and motivations to physical activity participation and healthy eating in middle-aged Australian men. Am. J. Men’s Health 2012, 6, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Runenko, S.D.; Achkasov, E.E.; Volodina, K.A.; Zhukovskaya, A.V.; Mushkambarov, N.N.; Butko, D.Y. Nordic Walking as an Effective Physical Activity for Weight Loss Among Overweight Young Adults in High Schools. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 2020, 60, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sánchez-Lastra, M.A.; Torres, J.; Martínez-Lemos, I.M.; Ayán, C. Nordic Walking for Women With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur J Cancer Care 2019, 28, e13130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Muollo, V.; Rossi, A.P.; Milanese, C.; Masciocchi, E.; Taylor, M.; Zamboni, M.; Rosa, R.; Federico Schena, F.; Pellegrini, B. The Effects of Exercise and Diet Program in Overweight People—Nordic Walking Versus Walking. Clin. Interv. Aging 2019, 28, 1555–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bauman, A.E.; Reis, R.S.; Sallis, J.F.; Wells, J.C.; Loos, R.F.; Martin, B.W. Correlates of physical activity: Why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet 2012, 380, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Martin, M.; Moscoso, D.; Pedrajas, N. Gender differences in motivations to practice physical activity and sport in old age. Rev. Int. Med. Cienc. Act. Fis. Dep. 2013, 13, 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  27. Butt, J.; Weinberg, R.; Breckon, J.D.; Claytor, R.P. Adolescent physical activity participation and motivational determinants across gender, age, and race. J. Phys. Act. Health. 2011, 8, 1074–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Biernat, E.; Buchholz, S. The Regularities in Insufficient Leisure-Time Physical Activity in Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Napolitano, M.A.; Papandonatos, G.D.; Borradaile, K.E.; Whiteley, J.A.; Marcus, B.H. Effects of weight status and barriers on physical activity adoption among previously inactive women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011, 19, 2183–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Türk, Y.; Theel, W.; Kasteleyn, M.J.; Franssen, F.M.E.; Hiemstra, P.S.; Rudolphus, A.; Taube, C.; Braunstahl, G.J. High intensity training in obesity: A Meta-analysis. Obes. Sci. Pract. 2017, 3, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. WHO. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic; WHO Technical Report Series. 894; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  32. National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults-the evidence report. Obes. Res. 1998, 6 (Suppl. S2), 51S–209S. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cole, T.J.; Bellizzi, M.C.; Flegal, K.M.; Dietz, W.H. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. Brit. Med. J. 2000, 320, 1240–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. World Health Organization. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment; Health Communications: Melbourne, Australia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  35. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004, 363, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Morris, T.; Rogers, H. Measuring Motives for Physical Activity. In Sport and Chance of Life: International Sport Science Congress; The Kansas Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2004; pp. 242–250. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zizzi, S.J.; Keeler, L.A.; Watson, J.C. The interaction of goal orientation and stage of change on exercise behavior in college students. J. Sport Behav. 2006, 29, 96–110. [Google Scholar]
  38. Molanorouzi, K.; Khoo, S.; Morris, T. Validating the Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS). BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Eliot, A.C.; Woodward, W.A. Statistical Analysis Quick Reference Guidebook; With SPSS Examples; Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 2007; p. 40. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gatignon, H. Statistical Analysis of Management Data; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zach, S.; Bar-Eli, M.; Morris, T.; Moore, M. Measuring motivation for physical activity: An exploratory study of PALMS—The physical activity and leisure motivation scale. Athl. Insight 2012, 4, 141–152. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tabachnick, B.G.; Fidell, L. Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd ed.; Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  43. Montani, J.P.; Schutz, Y.; Dullo, A.G. Dieting and weight cycling as risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases: Who is really at risk? Word Obes. 2015, 16, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Reiner, M.; Niermann, C.; Jekauc, D.; Woll, A. Long-term health benefits of physical activity—A systematic review of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Humphreys, B.R.; McLeod, L.; Ruseski, J.E. Physical activity and health outcomes: Evidence from Canada. Health Econ. 2014, 23, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bize, R.; Johnson, J.A.; Plotnikoff, R.C. Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: A systematic review. Prev. Med. 2007, 45, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Biddle, S.J.; Ciaccioni, S.; Thomas, G.; Vergeer, I. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: An updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2019, 42, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Koster, E.P. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Qual. Prefer. 2009, 20, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lavie, C.J.; De Schutter, A.; Milani, V.R. Body composition and the obesity paradox in coronary heart disease: Can heavier really be healthier? Heart 2015, 101, 1610–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. André, N.; Dishman, R. Evidence for the construct validity of self-motivation as a correlate of exercise adherence in french older adults. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2012, 20, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Aaltonen, S.; Leskinen, T.; Morris, T.; Alen, M.; Kaprio, J.; Liukkonen, J.; Kujala, U.M. Motives for and barriers to physical activity in twin pairs discordant for leisure time physical activity for 30 years. Int. J. Sports Med. 2012, 33, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gilmour, H. Physically active Canadians. Health Rep. 2007, 18, 45. [Google Scholar]
  53. Watson, K.B.; Frederick, G.M.; Harris, C.D.; Carlson, S.A.; Fulton, J.E. U.S. Adults’ Participation in Specific Activities: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System—2011. J. Phys. Act. Health 2015, 12 (Suppl. S1), S3–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kadir, M.A.; Kubacki, K.; Rundle-Thiele, S. Perceived benefits and barriers of walking among overweight and obese adults. Health Mark. Q. 2019, 36, 54–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Maki, B.E. Gait Changes in Older Adults: Predictors of Falls or Indicators of Fear? J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1997, 45, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Figueiredo, S.; Finch, L.; Mai, J.; Ahmed, S.; Huang, A.; Mayo, N.E. Nordic walking for geriatric rehabilitation: A randomized pilot trial. Disabil. Rehabil. 2013, 35, 968–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Short, C.; Vandelanotte, C.; Duncan, M. Individual characteristics associated with physical activity intervention delivery mode preferences among adults. Int. J. Behav. Nut. Phys. Act. 2014, 11, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Adachi-Mejia, A.M.; Schifferdecker, K.E. A mixed-methods approach to assessing barriers to physical activity among women with class I, class II, and class III obesity. Public Health 2016, 139, 212–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Gavin, J.; Keough, M.; Abravanel, M.; Moudrakovsski, T.; Mcbrearty, M. Motivations for participation in physical activity across the lifespan. Int. J. Wellbeing 2014, 4, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dix, B.; Görner, K.; Błeńska, M.; Kortas, J.; Zukow, W. Nordic Walking as a form of activity for people of all ages. J. Health Sci. 2013, 3, 71–92. [Google Scholar]
  61. Nelson, M.E.; Rejeski, W.J.; Blair, S.N.; Duncan, P.W.; Judge, J.O.; King, A.C.; Macera, C.; Castaneda-Sceppa, C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: Recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007, 39, 1435–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Breyer, M.K.; Breyer-Kohansal, R.; Funk, G.C. Nordic Walking improves daily physical activities in COPD: A randomized controlled trial. Respir. Res. 2010, 11, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Gomeñuka, N.A.; Bianchi Oliveira, H.; Soares Silva, E.; Kanitz, A.C.; Veiga Liedtke, G.; Barreto Schuch, F.; Peyré-Tartaruga, L.A. Effects of Nordic walking training on quality of life, balance and functional mobility in elderly: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mullen, S.; Whaley, D. Age, gender, and fitness club membership: Factors related to initial involvement and sustained participation. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2010, 8, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Riseth, L.; Nost, T.H.; Nilsen, T.I.L.; Steinsbekk, A. Long-term members’ use of fitness centers: A qualitative study. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 2019, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, W.; Lee, A.M.; Solmon, M.A. Relationships among Dispositional Ability Conceptions, Intrinsic Motivation, Perceived Competence, Experience, and Performance. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 2005, 24, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sicilia Camacho, A.; Aguila Soto, C.; Moreno Murcia, J.A.; González-Cutre Coll, D. Factores motivacionales y experiencia autotélica en el ejercicio físico: Propuesta de un modelo explicativo. Univ. Psychol. 2011, 10, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ulseth, A.L.B. New Opportunities—Complex Motivations: Gender Differences in Motivation for Physical Activity in the Context of Sports Clubs and Fitness Centers. Int. J. Appl. Sports Sci. 2008, 20, 44–66. [Google Scholar]
  70. Deelen, I.; Ettema, D.; Kamphuis, C.B.M. Sports participation in sport clubs, gyms or public spaces: How users of different sports settings differ in their motivations, goals, and sports frequency. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Clifford, B.K.; Mizrahi, D.; Sandler, C.X.; Barry, B.K.; Simar, D.; Wakefield, C.E.; Goldstein, D. Barriers and facilitators of exercise experienced by cancer survivors: A mixed methods systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2018, 26, 685–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Toft, B.S.; Uhrenfeldt, L. The lived experiences of being physically active when morbidly obese: A qualitative systematic review. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-Being 2015, 10, 28577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Leone, L.A.; Ward, D.S. A mixed methods comparison of perceived benefits and barriers to exercise between obese and nonobese women. J. Phys. Act. Health 2013, 10, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Jakicic, J.M.; Rogers, R.J.; Davis, K.K.; Collins, K.A. Role of Physical Activity and Exercise in Treating Patients with Overweight and Obesity. Clin. Chem. 2018, 64, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Siegel, S.A.; Shealy, D.J.; Nakada, M.T.; Le, J.; Woulfe, D.S.; Probert, D.S.; Kollias, G.; Ghrayeb, J.; Vilčka, J.; Daddona, W.P. The mouse/human chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2 neutralizes TNF in vitro and protects transgenic mice from cachexia and TNF lethality in vivo. Cytokine 1995, 7, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Biddle, S.J.H.; Vergeer, I. A brief history of exercise psychology. In APA Handbook of Sport and Exercise Psychology; Anshel, M.H., Petruzzello, S.J., Labbé, E.E., Eds.; Exercise psychology; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; Volume 2, pp. 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  77. Contreras, O.R.; Fernánndez, J.G.; García, L.M.; Palou, P.; Ponseti, J. El autoconcepto físico y su relación con la práctica deportiva en estudiantes adolescentes. Rev. Psicol. Deport. 2010, 19, 23–39. [Google Scholar]
  78. Palou Sampol, P.; Borràs Rotger, P.A.; Vidal Conti, J.; Gili Planas, M.; Ponseti Verdaguer, F.X. Motivos para el inicio, mantenimiento y abandono de la práctica deportiva de los preadolescentes de la isla de Mallorca. Apunt. Educ. Fís. Deport. 2005, 81, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  79. Josefsson, T.; Lindwall, M.; Archer, T. Physical exercise intervention in depressive disorders: Meta-analysis and systematic review. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2014, 24, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Rosenbaum, S.; Tiedemann, A.; Sherrington, C.; Curtis, J.; Ward, P.B. Physical activity interventions for people with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2014, 75, 964–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Åberg, M.A.I.; Waern, M.; Nyberg, J.; Pedersen, N.L.; Bergh, Y.N.; Åberg, D.; Nilsson, M.; Kuhn, H.G.; Torén, K. Cardiovascular fitness in males at age 18 and risk of serious depression in adulthood: Swedish prospective population-based study. Br. J. Psychiatry 2012, 201, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Knöchel, C.; Oertel-Knöchel, W.; O’Dwyer, L.; Prvulovic, D.; Alves, G.; Kollmann, B.; Hampel, H. Cognitive and behavioural effects of physical exercise in psychiatric patients. Prog. Neurobiol. 2012, 96, 46–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Agudelo, L.Z.; Femenía, T.; Orhan, F.; Porsmyr-Palmertz, M.; Goiny, M.; Martinez-Redondo, V.; Correia, J.C.; Izadi, M.; Bhat, M.; Schuppe-Koistinen, I.; et al. Skeletal muscle PGC-1α1 modulates kynurenine metabolism and mediates resilience to stress-induced depression. Cell 2014, 159, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Soundy, A.; Condon, N. Patients experiences of maintaining mental well-being and hope within motor neuron disease: A thematic synthesis. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Hassmén, P.; Koivula, N.; Uutela, A. Physical exercise and psychological well-being: A population study in Finland. Prev. Med. 2000, 30, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Jiménez-Torres, M.G.; Godoy-Izquierdo, D.; Godoy García, J.F. Relación entrelos motivos para la práctica físico-deportivay las experiencias de flujo en jóvenes:diferencias en función del sexo. Univ. Psychol. 2012, 11, 909–920. [Google Scholar]
  87. Taylor, I.M.; Ntoumanis, N.; Standage, M.; Spray, C.M. Motivational Predictors of Physical Education Students’ Effort, Exercise Intentions, and Leisure-Time Physical Activity: A Multilevel Linear Growth Analysis. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2016, 32, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Pan, X.; Shi, X.; Korzh, V.; Yu, H.; Wohland, T. Line scan fluorescence correlation spectroscopy for three-dimensional microfluidic flow velocity measurement. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009, 14, 024049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Martínez-de-Quel, O.; Suárez-Iglesias, D.M.; López-Flores, M.; Pérez, C.A. Physical activity, dietary habits and sleep quality before and during COVID-19 lockdown: A longitudinal study. Appetite 2021, 158, 105019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Arango, C.A.; Huynh, K.P.; Sabetti, L. How Do You Pay? The Role of Incentives at the Point-of-Sale. SSRN Electron. J. 2011, 1–40, Bank of Canada Working Paper 2011-23 October 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sharifi, N.; Mahdavi, R.; Ebrahimi-Mameghani, M. Perceived Barriers to Weight loss Programs for Overweight or Obese Women. Health Promot. Perspect. 2013, 3, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. García-Pinillos, F.; Martínez-Amat, A.; Hita-Contreras, F.; Martínez-López, M.J.; Latorre-Román, P.A. Effects of a contrast training program without external load on vertical jump, kicking speed, sprint, and agility of young soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2014, 28, 2452–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Stankowski, C.L.; Trauntvein, N.E.; Hall, S.L. I use the student recreation center, but I would use it more if: Understanding male and female constraints to student recreation center use. Recreat. Sports J. 2017, 41, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Giles-Corti, B.; Donovan, R.J. The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc. Sci. Med. 2002, 54, 1793–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Age and morphological parameters of respondents.
Table 1. Age and morphological parameters of respondents.
Tested ParametersStatistics
Women ( x ¯ ± SD) Men ( x ¯ ± SD)
Normal Body WeightOverweight and ObesityNormal Body WeightOverweight and Obesity
Number of respondents364193338171
Age (years)40.8 ± 19.241.3 ± 17.442.5 ± 18.943.9 ± 16.7
Height (cm)166.9 ± 2.7166.4 ± 1.9183.2 ± 2.5181.4 ± 3.1
Body weight
(kg)		62.1 ± 3.181.2 ± 4.376.1 ± 3.797.3 ± 3.9
BMI (kg/m2)22.2 ± 4.229.6 ± 5.622.6 ± 3.830.2 ± 4.8
Table
Table 2. International Classification of adults based on Body Mass Index.
Table 2. International Classification of adults based on Body Mass Index.
ClassificationBMI (kg/m2)
Underweight≥18.50
- Severe thinness16.00–16.99
- Moderate thinness17.00–18.49
- Mild thinness18.50–25.99
Normal18.50–24.99
Overweight≥25.00
- Preobese25.00–29.99
Obese≥30.00
Class I30.00–34.99
Class II35.00–39.99
Class III≥40.00
Source: WHO 2000 and WHO 2004 [34,35].
Table
Table 3. Frequency of participation in NW classes.
Table 3. Frequency of participation in NW classes.
Frequency of ParticipationWilks’ Lambda: 0.162 F = 51.901 p < 0.001 *Classification
Function
Wilks’ LambdaF ValueP LevelNormal Body WeightOverweight or Obesity
Up to three times a week0.56213.1540.001 *1.3190.685
Occasionally0.57248.3700.001 *0.2991.587
Practically every day0.67224.8180.001 *0.6520.337
Constant10.1529.583
*—level of significance, p < 0.050.
Table
Table 4. Motives affecting participation in NW training.
Table 4. Motives affecting participation in NW training.
Types of MotivesWilks’ Lambda: 0.162 F = 51.901 p < 0.001 *Classification Function
Wilks’ LambdaF ValueP LevelNormal Body WeightOverweight or Obesity
Health motives
Improving the physical capacity of the body0.18776.6910.001 *162.61143.57
Concern for health0.27183.9670.001 *93.1677.98
Improving body shape0.19325.9870.001 *53.7571.51
Lifespan extension0.1591.1790.28047.5150.43
Willingness to have influence on one’s body0.21995.5180.001 *24.412.02
Weight loss0.28466.7180.001 *24.1644.03
Improving physical condition0.265131.450.001 *23.4717.13
Willingness to be outdoors0.23355.8790.001 *17.566.30
Proper rehabilitation after illness0.18922.7680.001 *9.5913.94
Improving the quality of life0.19627.8980.001 *0.8223.08
Social motives
Willingness to improve self-esteem0.456131.870.001 *21.439.15
Escape from everyday worries0.47875.7130.001 *19.0511.60
Feeling proud of participating in training0.41159.4470.001 *14.527.12
Reducing the sense of shame0.47857.7540.001 *14.233.87
Gaining a sense of fulfillment0.48710.1640.002 *12.128.93
A sense of belonging to a group of
active people		0.48933.6960.001 *3.868.03
Mood improvement0.4217.4080.007 *7.885.87
Motives resulting from the desire to compete
Overcoming one’s physical weaknesses0.871164.800.001 *11.847.95
Ability to compete with others0.798102.700.001 *9.366.71
Constant429.78419.17
*—level of significance, p < 0.050.
Table
Table 5. Barriers affecting participation in NW training.
Table 5. Barriers affecting participation in NW training.
Types of BarriersWilks’ Lambda: 0.162 F = 51.901 p < 0.001 *Classification
Function
Wilks’ LambdaF ValueP LevelNormal Body WeightOverweight or Obesity
Lack of proper areas for practicing NW0.32826.0330.001 *1.9140.934
Lack of time—professional work0.37822.2810.001 *1.5530.582
Practicing other physical activities0.3985.3750.022 *1.4902.024
One’s own laziness0.3067.5880.006 *1.3280.733
One’s own shyness0.35416.3690.001 *0.8481.570
Lack of time—family responsibilities0.38124.3590.001 *0.2121.651
Constant10.1529.583
*—level of significance, p < 0.050.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soroka, A.; Godlewska, A.; Mazurek-Kusiak, A. Motives and Barriers Affecting the Participation of Polish People in the Physical Activity of Nordic Walking. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16398. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416398

AMA Style

Soroka A, Godlewska A, Mazurek-Kusiak A. Motives and Barriers Affecting the Participation of Polish People in the Physical Activity of Nordic Walking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(24):16398. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416398

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soroka, Andrzej, Agnieszka Godlewska, and Anna Mazurek-Kusiak. 2022. "Motives and Barriers Affecting the Participation of Polish People in the Physical Activity of Nordic Walking" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 24: 16398. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416398

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop