How Can Resource-Exhausted Cities Get Out of “The Valley of Death”? An Evaluation Index System and Obstacle Degree Analysis of Green Sustainable Development
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Resource-Exhausted Cities and Green Transformation
2.2. Green Development
2.3. Comparision of the Literature on Urban Transformation and Sustainable Development
3. Research Design
3.1. Data Collection
3.1.1. Selection of Coal-Resource-Exhausted Cities
3.1.2. Selection of Evaluation Index on Green Development
- (1)
- Resources and the environment. The resources and the environment are the material basis for human survival and societal development. This indicator mainly reflects the field of the ecological environment, paying attention to the impact of economic development. In particular, this includes the impact of industrial discharge on the quality of the ecological environment, the impact of waste and wastewater treatment in daily life on the urban environment and the impact of urban greening on improving the quality of the living environment for urban residents [62].
- (2)
- Economic development. Economic development is accompanied by the growth of the economic aggregate, and the increase in the economic aggregate can drive an increase in people’s income. As the economy increases, it will drive changes in economic and financial structures. Therefore, the measurement of economic development mainly includes four aspects: the growth of regional GDP, the improvement of income, the investment of science and education and the optimization of economic structure [14,77].
- (3)
- Population and social welfare. The population in the evaluation index system refers to the population living in cities and market towns. Social welfare mainly focuses on human development and conducts an all-round investigation from the perspectives of transportation, education, medical treatment, etc. [64]. The investigation of green development can be realized through the green degree of products and services; furthermore, the development of human beings can benefit from a green economy.
3.2. Determination of the Evaluation Index Weight of Green Development
- (1)
- Samples and data sources
- (2)
- Dimensionless data processing
- (3)
- Data validity test
- (4)
- Calculation of principal component analysis
4. Research Results
4.1. Evaluation Analysis of Green Development
4.1.1. Evaluation Model of Green Development
4.1.2. Evaluation of Green Development of Coal-Resource-Exhausted Cities
4.2. Obstacle Degree Analysis of Green Development
4.2.1. Improved Obstacle Degree Model on the Green Development of Cities
4.2.2. Analysis of Obstacle Factors on the Green Development of Resource-Exhausted Cities
5. Discussion
5.1. Findings
5.2. Theoretical Contributions
5.3. Recommendation
5.4. Limitations and Future Directions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Cui, J. Spatial Differentiation and Influencing Factors in the Ecological Well-Being Performance of Urban Agglomerations in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River: A Hierarchical Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Omri, A. Technological innovation and sustainable development: Does the stage of development matter? Environ. Impact Assess. 2020, 83, 106398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, X.Q.; An, Y.F. The relationship between technological innovation and green transformation efficiency in China: An empirical analysis using spatial panel data. Technol. Soc. 2021, 64, 101498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majerník, M.; Naščáková, J.; Malindžáková, M.; Drábik, P.; Bednárová, L. Areas of sustainability: Environment, economy, and society. In Sustainable Resource Management; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 25–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogunmakinde, O.E.; Egbelakin, T.; Sher, W. Contributions of the circular economy to the UN sustainable development goals through sustainable construction. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 178, 106023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awosusi, A.A.; Xulu, N.G.; Ahmadi, M.; Rjoub, H.; Altuntaş, M.; Uhunamure, S.E.; Akadiri, S.S.; Kirikkaleli, D. The Sustainable environment in Uruguay: The roles of financial development, natural resources, and trade globalization. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 875577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.M.; Gao, L.F.; Hu, X.H.; Shi, J.; Mohsin, M. Does industrial eco-innovative development and economic growth affect environmental sustainability? New evidence from BRICS countries. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 955173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nogueira, C. Contradictions in the concept of sustainable development: An analysis in social, economic, and political contexts. Environ. Dev. 2019, 30, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, M.Z.; Krauland, A.K.V.; Coughlin, S.J.; Palmer, F.C.; Smith, M.M. Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage. Renew. Energy 2022, 184, 430–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strokal, V.; Kuiper, E.J.; Bak, M.P.; Vriend, P.; Wang, M.R.; Wijnen, J.V.; Strokal, M. Future microplastics in the Black Sea: River exports and reduction options for zero pollution. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 178, 113633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capasso, M.; Hansen, T.; Heiberg, J.; Klitkou, A.; Steen, M. Green growth–A synthesis of scientific findings. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 146, 390–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonsu, N.O. Towards a circular and low-carbon economy: Insights from the transitioning to electric vehicles and net zero economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 256, 120659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargas-Hernandez, J.G. Strategic transformational transition of green economy, green growth, and sustainable development: An institutional approach. Int. J. Green Comput. 2020, 11, 34–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Ding, W.; Yang, Z.; Yang, G.; Du, J. Measuring China’s regional inclusive green growth. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 136367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, G.; Zhu, J.; Luo, S. The impact of fintech innovation on green growth in China: Mediating effect of green finance. Ecol. Econ. 2022, 193, 107308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamei, E.; Jamei, Y.; Seyedmahmoudian, M.; Horan, B.; Mekhilef, S.; Stojcevski, A. Investigating the impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on air quality, surface Urban Heat Island, air temperature and lighting energy consumption in City of Melbourne. Energy Strategy Rev. 2022, 44, 100963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.J.; Chen, H.; Long, R.Y.; Sun, Q.Q.; Jiang, S.Y.; Liu, B. Has the Sustainable Development Planning Policy Promoted the Green Transformation in China’s Resource-based Cities? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 180, 106181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Q.; Zhu, M.K.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J. Achieving resilience through smart cities? Evidence from China. Habitat Int. 2021, 111, 102348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Chen, Y.Y.; Hao, D.P.; Zhang, L.J. A multi-criteria decision-making approach to help resource-exhausted areas choose suitable transformation templates—The example of Wansheng in Chongqing, China. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2022, 13, 101709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mardones, C.; Ricardo, D.R. Correction of Chilean GDP for natural capital depreciation and environmental degradation caused by copper mining. Resour. Policy 2019, 60, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venter, Z.S.; Figari, H.; Krange, O.; Gundersen, V. Environmental justice in a very green city: Spatial inequality in exposure to urban nature, air pollution and heat in Oslo, Norway. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 160193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, R.Y.; Li, H.F.; Wu, M.F.; Li, W.B. Dynamic evaluation of the green development level of China’s coal-resource-based cities using the TOPSIS method. Resour. Policy 2021, 74, 102415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.L.; Huang, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.D.; Mao, J.Q. Ecological security of mineral resource-based cities in China: Multidimensional measurements, spatiotemporal evolution, and comparisons of classifications. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 132, 108269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Zhu, B.K.; Zhang, S.; Zeng, H.; Li, K.; Wang, B.; Dong, Z.; Zhou, C. New indices system for quantifying the nexus between economic-social development, natural resources consumption, and environmental pollution in China during 1978–2018. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 804, 150180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Y.; Guo, H.; Chen, L.; Liu, X.; Gu, M.; Ke, X. Regional analysis of the green development level differences in Chinese mineral resource-based cities. Resour. Policy 2019, 61, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapman, R.; Plummer, P.; Tonts, M. The resource boom and socio-economic well-being in Australian resource towns: A temporal and spatial analysis. Urban Geogr. 2015, 36, 629–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Shen, Y.; Wang, Y.A. Evaluation of economic transformation and upgrading of resource-based cities in Shaanxi province based on an improved TOPSIS method. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 37, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falck, O.; Koenen, J.; Lohse, T. Evaluating a place-based innovation policy: Evidence from the innovative regional growth cores program in East Germany. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2019, 79, 103480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.Y.; Liu, M.; Song, W.J. Place-based policies, government intervention, and regional innovation: Evidence from China’s Resource-Exhausted city program. Resour. Policy 2022, 75, 102438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, X.C.; Chen, H. Measurement on the efficiency of economic transformation for the resource declining cities. Urban Probl. 2016, 1, 28–35. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, J.; Zhou, J.Q. Study on the influences of industry transformation on the sustainable development of resource-exhausted city space. Procedia Eng. 2011, 21, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guo, Q.B.; Meng, X.R.; Li, Y.M.; Lv, X.; Liu, C. A prediction model for the surface residual subsidence in an abandoned goaf for sustainable development of resource-exhausted cities. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 279, 123803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B.; Zhan, X.Y.; Tian, Y.H. Evaluation on the effect of the transformation policy of resource-exhausted cities—An empirical analysis based on the difference-in-difference model. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 959–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namazi, M.; Mohammadi, E. Natural resource dependence and economic growth: A TOPSIS/DEA analysis of innovation efficiency. Resour. Policy 2018, 59, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basu, T.; Das, A. Systematic review of how eco-environmental transformation due to urbanization can be investigated in the sustainable development of Indian cities. Environ. Chall. 2021, 4, 100099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lotz-Sisitka, H.; Ali, M.B.; Mphepo, G.; Chaves, M.; Macintyre, T.; Pesanayi, T.; Wals, A.; Mukute, M.; Kronlid, D.; Tran, D.T.; et al. Co-designing research on transgressive learning in times of climate change. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2016, 20, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-gafy, I.; Grigg, N.; Waskom, R. Water-food-energy: Nexus and non-nexus approaches for optimal cropping pattern. Water Resour. Manag. 2017, 31, 4971–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pauliuk, S.; Koslowski, M.; Madhu, K.; Schulte, S.; Kilchert, S. Co-design of digital transformation and sustainable development strategies—What socio-metabolic and industrial ecology research can contribute. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 343, 130997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebri, M. Use renewables to be cleaner: Meta-analysis of the renewable energy consumption–economic growth nexus. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasul, G.; Sharma, B. The nexus approach to water-energy-food security: An option for adaptation to climate change. Clim. Policy 2016, 16, 682–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaddoura, S.; Khatib, S.E. Review of water-energy-food nexus tools to improve the nexus modelling approach for integrated policy making. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 77, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.H.; Cai, W.; Jia, S.; Zhang, M.Y.; Guo, H.Y.; Hu, L.K.; Jiang, Z.G. Energy-based evaluation and improvement for sustainable manufacturing systems considering resource efficiency and environment performance. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 177, 176–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, F.; Liu, G.; Liang, S.; Su, M.; Yang, Z. Critical review of the energy-water-carbon nexus in cities. Energy 2019, 171, 1017–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherwood, J. The significance of biomass in a circular economy. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 300, 122755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.Z.; Xu, J.F.; Zhang, K.; Guo, S.Z.; Lv, X.; Mu, X.Y.; Yang, L.; Song, Y.; Hu, X.; Ma, Y.; et al. New insights into the DPSIR model: Revealing the dynamic feedback mechanism and efficiency of ecological civilization construction in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 348, 131377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, X.Y.; Xu, Y.S.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Lu, J. Experiment and numerical investigation of inhalable particles and indoor environment with ventilation system. Energy Build. 2022, 271, 112309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sivek, M.; Jirásek, J.; Kavina, P.; Vojnarová, M.; Kurková, T.; Bašová, A. Divorce after hundreds of years of marriage: Prospects for coal mining in the Czech Republic with regard to the European Union. Energy Policy 2020, 142, 111524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunzburger, Y.; Agnoletti, M.F.; Deshaies, M.; Ferey, S.; Raggi, P. Social perception of unconventional gas extraction on the outskirts of a former coal-mining area in Northeast France. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2017, 4, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trencher, G.; Downie, C.; Hasegawa, K.; Asuka, J. Divestment trends in Japan’s international coal businesses. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 124, 109779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, M.L.; Luo, F.Z.; Fang, Y.H. Research on the sustainability promotion mechanisms of industries in China’s resource-based cities—From an ecological perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 315, 128114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.Y.; Li, Y.M.; Li, J.Q.; Wang, Z.T. Green process innovation, green product innovation and its economic performance improvement paths: A survey and structural model. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 297, 113282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.J.; Long, R.Y.; Chen, H. Economic transition policies in Chinese resource-based cities: An overview of government efforts. Energy Policy 2013, 55, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Zhang, J.J.; Geng, X.L.; Wang, T.; Wang, K.; Liu, S.D. Increasing green infrastructure-based ecological resilience in urban systems: A perspective from locating ecological and disturbance sources in a resource-based city. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, Z.R.; Wang, J.M.; Tang, Q.; Liu, B.; Niu, H.B. Evolution of land use in coal-based cities based on the ecological niche theory: A case study in Shuozhou City, China. Resour. Policy 2021, 74, 102245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Fang, X.L.; Yin, S.W.; Chen, W. Low-carbon development quality of cities in China: Evaluation and obstacle analysis. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 64, 102553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, D.; McGranahan, G. The urban informal economy, local inclusion and achieving a global green transformation. Habitat Int. 2016, 53, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guan, X.L.; Wei, H.K.; Lu, S.S.; Dai, Q.; Su, H.J. Assessment on the urbanization strategy in China: Achievements, challenges and reflections. Habitat Int. 2018, 71, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardin, G. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 1968, 162, 1243–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pearce, D. Blueprint for a Green Economy; Earthscan Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Kaufmann, R.K. Blueprint for a green economy: David Pearce, Anil Markandya and Edward B. Barbier. Earthscan, London, Great Britain, 1989. 192 pp. Ecol. Econ. 1993, 7, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, X.Y.; Zhang, L.; Lu, J. Past—Present—Future: Urban spatial succession and transition of rail transit station zones in Japan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022, 19, 13633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, M.X.; Lu, X.Y.; Qin, Z.X.; Liu, X.L.; Fei, L. Social-ecological system changes in China from 1990 to 2018. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 139, 108926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, A.G.; Zhou, S.J. Green Development: Functional definition, mechanism analysis and development strategy. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2014, 24, 14–21. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, X.G.; Duan, C.R. Study on performance evaluation and regional differences of green transformation in coal-resource-exhausted cities. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2018, 28, 9. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.W.; Shen, W.F.; Duan, P.X.; Chen, X.L. Evaluation of sustainable development transformation of coal-resource-exhausted cities in the new era. China Min. Mag. 2020, 29, 8. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Tao, X.Y.; Wu, Z.Y.; Li, X.F.; Zhu, J.L.; Chu, Y.; Chang, Y.M. Performance measurement and obstacle factor analysis of the transformation and development of coal resource- exhausted cities: A case study of Jiaozuo City. Ecol. Econ. 2022, 4, 94–100. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Dwivedi, P.P.; Sharma, D.K. Application of Shannon Entropy and COCOSO techniques to analyze performance of sustainable development goals: The case of the Indian Union Territories. Results Eng. 2022, 14, 100416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, L.E. Evaluation of green transformation model of coal-resource-exhausted cities based on AHP. J. Zaozhuang Univ. 2022, 39, 8. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Dewa, D.D.; Buchori, I.; Sejati, A.W.; Liu, Y. Shannon Entropy-based urban spatial fragmentation to ensure sustainable development of the urban coastal city: A case study of Semarang, Indonesia. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2022, 28, 100839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saiu, V.; Blečić, I.; Meloni, I. Making sustainability development goals (SDGs) operational at suburban level: Potentials and limitations of neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2022, 96, 106845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunha-Zeri, G.; Guidolini, J.F.; Branco, E.A.; Ometto, J.P. How sustainable is the nitrogen management in Brazil? A sustainability assessment using the Entropy Weight Method. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 316, 115330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, X.Q.; Ma, Q.R.; Yuan, Y.Y.; Wu, Z.H.; Zhang, M. Current situation and key manufacturing considerations of green furniture in China: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 267, 121957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, F.W. Toward post-2020 global biodiversity conservation: Footprint and direction in China. Innovation 2021, 2, 100175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mihelcic, J.R.; Crittenden, J.C.; Small, M.J.; Shonnard, D.R.; Hokanson, D.R.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, H.; Sorby, S.A.; James, V.U.; Sutherland, J.W.; et al. Sustainability science and engineering: The emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 5314–5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, C.; Miao, C.H.; Zhang, W.Z.; Chen, X.H. Spatiotemporal patterns of urban sprawl and its relationship with economic development in China during 1990–2010. Habitat Int. 2018, 79, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voorspools, K. Sustainability of the future: Rethinking the fundamentals of energy research. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2004, 8, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Bureau Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook; National Bureau Statistics of China, China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Pandey, B.; Agrawal, M.; Singh, S. Assessment of air pollution around coal mining area: Emphasizing on spatial distributions, seasonal variations and heavy metals, using cluster and principal component analysis. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2014, 5, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lloyd, S.; Mohseni, M.; Rebentrost, P. Quantum principal component analysis. Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 631–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jing, Z.; Wang, J. Sustainable development evaluation of the society-economy-environment in a resource-based city of China: A complex network approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.S.; Zhuang, X.Y. Container shipping scheduling method based on the evidence reasoning approach in fluctuating CCFI and BDI cycle. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 2022, 3997361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Destoumieux-Garzón, D.; Matthies-Wiesler, F.; Bierne, N.; Binot, A.; Boissier, J.; Devouge, A.; Garric, J.; Gruetzmacher, K.; Grunau, C.; Guégan, J.F.; et al. Getting out of crises: Environmental, social-ecological and evolutionary research is needed to avoid future risks of pandemics. Environ. Int. 2022, 158, 106915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jalaei, F.; Guest, G.; Gaur, A.; Zhang, J.Y. Exploring the effects that a non-stationary climate and dynamic electricity grid mix has on whole building life cycle assessment: A multi-city comparison. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghose, A.; McLaren, S.J.; Dowdell, D. Upgrading New Zealand’s existing office buildings—An assessment of life cycle impacts and its influence on 2050 climate change mitigation target. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 57, 102134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rayan, M.; Gruehn, D.; Khayyam, U. Planning for Sustainable Green Urbanism: An Empirical Bottom-Up (Community-Led) Perspective on Green Infrastructure (GI) Indicators in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Pakistan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zameer, H.; Muhammad, S.; Xuan, V.V. Reinforcing poverty alleviation efficiency through technological innovation, globalization, and financial development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 161, 120326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Q.Q.; Cui, L.H.; Hong, P.H. The impact of carbon emissions trading on energy efficiency: Evidence from quasi-experiment in China’s carbon emissions trading pilot. Energy Econ. 2022, 110, 106025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Cai, Y.P.; Lin, G. Pathways for sustainable municipal energy systems transition: A case study of Tangshan, a resource-based city in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 330, 129835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, M.; Moreira, H.; Cabral, J.A.; Gabriel, R.; Teixeira, A.; Bastos, R.; Aires, A. contribution of home gardens to sustainable development: Perspectives from a supported opinion essay. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, T.; Ren, C.; Zhang, S.; Yin, A.; Yue, W. Coupling coordination analysis of urban development and ecological environment in yrban Area of Guilin based on multi-source data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, C.; Li, J.; Liu, T.; Xu, M.; Wang, H.; Li, X. The spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of the Chinese cities’ ecological welfare performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi, N.; Tsun, K.; Ng, W.; Richter, A. Development of a regional solid waste management framework and its application to a prairie province in central Canada. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 82, 103904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abubakar, I.R.; Maniruzzaman, K.M.; Dano, U.L.; AlShihri, F.S.; AlShammari, M.S.; Ahmed, S.M.S.; Al-Gehlani, W.A.G.; Alrawaf, T.I. Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harijani, A.M.; Mansour, S. Municipal solid waste recycling network with sustainability and supply uncertainty considerations. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 81, 103857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rockström, J. Future Earth. Science 2016, 351, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Country | Cases | Resources | Transformation Modes |
---|---|---|---|
Germany | Ruhr Industrial Base | Resource-based production (coal and steel) | New economic zone (computer and information technology industry, etc.) |
France | Lorraine | Chemical industry (iron ore and coal mine) | Industrial transformation |
The United States | Pittsburgh | Steel-resource-based city | Light and service industry |
The United States | Houston | Oil-resource-based city | Comprehensive metropolis (aerospace center) |
The United States | Los Angeles | Oil-resource-based city | Agriculture, aircraft manufacturing, ordnance industries and clusters |
Japan | Kyushu | Coal-resource-based city | High-tech industrial zones |
Spain | Ibérian | Mining area | New geological mining |
Italy | Italy | Mining industry | Geology and urban sustainability |
Greece | Peloponnese Peninsula | Coal mine Mining | Mining reclamation, modern agriculture |
Country | Type | Characteristics |
---|---|---|
The United States | Market-oriented | The government rarely takes specific transformational control, whether the city prospers or declines is more determined by market forces and enterprises’ development goals. |
The EU | Government-oriented | The government establishes special committees to formulate detailed objectives, plans and policies, adjust the industrial structure, promote regional industrial progress and economic development, and realize the take-off of the regional economy through the full cooperation of government and society. |
Japan | Industrial policy | A kind of industrial aid under the guidance of industrial policy. The government formulates and modifies industrial policies, sets goals and measures according to the changes of domestic and foreign markets and the situation in coal areas. |
South America (Venezuela, etc.) | Laissez-faire | The government has hardly taken any transformation measures, so the development of resource-based cities has to stagnate. |
China | Government-oriented | Once identified as a resource-exhausted city by the State Council, the government will provide financial transfer support. |
Reference | Case Study | Methodology | Data Source | Research Content |
---|---|---|---|---|
Zeng and Duan (2018) [64] | Study on performance evaluation of green transformation of coal-resource-exhausted cities | Cluster analysis | Data analysis | The research was focused on differences in green transformation performance among different cities. |
Liu et al. (2020) [65] | Evaluation on sustainable development of coal-resource-exhausted cities | SBM DEA model/Malmquist index model | Respondent | The evaluation was based on the transformation efficiency of sustainable development. |
Tao et al. (2022) [66] | Performance measurement and obstacle factor analysis of the transformation of coal-resource-exhausted cities | Obstacle factor analysis | Statistics | A total of 27 indicators were selected from the three dimensions of economic development, people’s wellbeing and ecological environment to build a measurement system, and Jiaozuo City was taken as an example to measure the performance of transformation and development in 2008–2018. |
Dwivedi and Sharma (2022) [67] | Shannon entropy and COCOSO techniques to analyze the performance of sustainable development goals: The case of the Indian Union Territories | Entropy-based method/ COCOSO method | Official statistics | This study examined key targets for Indian Union Territories using the SDG India Index 3.0 and the proposed technology, as well as being based on demonstration of the assessed union territories with their achieving rank. Shannon entropy and COCOSO techniques were used in the MCDM model for evaluating the target. |
Yu (2022) [68] | Evaluation of the green transformation model for coal-resource-exhausted cities | Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) | Data analysis | This study used the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the effect on the green development of four types of green transformation models, and put forward the strategies of the green transformation model in coal-resource-exhausted cities. |
Dewa et al. (2022) [69] | Shannon entropy-based urban spatial fragmentation to ensure the sustainable development of the urban coastal city: A case study of Semarang, Indonesia | Entropy-based methods | USGS website | This study examined the extent to which the Shannon entropy index (H) could be used to ensure urban growth sustainability by measuring the spatial dispersion pattern of a built-up area. The Shannon entropy index was calculated based on the proximities to the city center (HCC) and the main road (HMR), which divided the study area into 17 zones. |
Saiu et al. (2022) [70] | Making sustainability development goals (SDGs) operational at a suburban level | SDG–NSA cross-analysis | Comparative analysis | This study aimed to contribute to fill this gap by examining the usefulness of neighborhood sustainability assessment (NSA) tools for operationalizing the 17 SDGs. |
Cunha-Zeri et al. (2022) [71] | A sustainability assessment using the entropy weight method in Brazil | Entropy weight method | Official sources | This study conducted an assessment of nitrogen sustainability in Brazil from 2000 to 2018, applying the entropy weight method (EWM) to a set of nitrogen-related indicators within four subsystems: environmental, economic, social and institutional. |
This paper | Evaluation index system and obstacle degree analysis on green sustainable development | Principal component analysis/extremum method | Field survey/ models | This study used the star-level standards on the scores of green development from 2005 to 2015. Through statistical analysis, the level and obstacles of urban green development were obtained. |
Region | Coal-Resource-Exhausted Cities |
---|---|
Northeast | Fuxin, Fushun, Liaoyuan, Hegang, Shuangyashan, Qitaihe, Changchun, Jilin, Tonghua, Chaoyang |
East | Zaozhuang, Tai’an, Zibo, Xuzhou, Pingxiang, Huaibei |
North | Zhangjiakou, Chengde, Linfen, Wuhai, Baotou |
Central | Jiaozuo, Jingzhou, Hengyang, Chenzhou, Loudi |
South | Shaoguan |
Southwest | Laibin, Chongqing, Guang’an |
Northwest | Shizuishan, Tongchuan, Lanzhou |
Target Layer | Rule Layer | Index Layer | Unit | Index Properties |
---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluation index system of green development for coal-resource-exhausted cities | Resources and the environment | Emission of GRP industrial dust /CNY 100 million | Ton/CNY 100 million | Negative |
Emission of GRP industrial sulfur dioxide /CNY 100 million | Ton/CNY 100 million | Negative | ||
Emission of GRP industrial wastewater /CNY 10,000 | Ton/CNY 100 million | Negative | ||
Utilization rate of general industrial solid waste | % | Positive | ||
Centralized processing rate of sewage treatment plant | % | Positive | ||
Harmless treatment rate of household trash | % | Positive | ||
Greening coverage rate of a built-up area | % | Positive | ||
Economic development | Regional per capita GDP | CNY | Positive | |
Growth rate of regional GDP | % | Positive | ||
Average annual salary of employees | CNY | Positive | ||
Proportion of science and technology in financial expenditure | ‰ | Positive | ||
Proportion of education in financial expenditure | ‰ | Positive | ||
Proportion of output value of primary industry | % | Positive | ||
Proportion of output value of secondary industry | % | Positive | ||
Proportion of output value of tertiary industry | % | Positive | ||
Population, social welfare | Population density | Person/km2 | Positive | |
Natural growth rate of population | ‰ | Positive | ||
Public buses (electric vehicles) /10,000 persons | Vehicle | Positive | ||
Public library collection/100 persons | Volume | Positive | ||
the number of doctors/10,000 persons | Person | Positive | ||
Proportion of employed population in the primary industry | % | Positive | ||
Proportion of employed population in the secondary industry | % | Positive | ||
Proportion of employed population in the tertiary industry | % | Positive |
KMO Test and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity | Test Value | |
---|---|---|
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy | 0.589 | |
Bartlett’s test of sphericity | Chi-square test | 10,479 |
Df | 253 | |
Sig. | 0.000 |
Index Variable | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emission of GRP industrial dust /CNY 100 million | 0.0891 | 0.123 | 0.0661 | −0.0753 | 0.248 | −0.244 |
Emission of GRP industrial sulfur dioxide/CNY 100 million | 0.195 | 0.187 | 0.171 | 0.0428 | 0.487 | −0.107 |
Emission of GRP industrial wastewater/CNY 10,000 | 0.199 | 0.119 | −0.0446 | −0.120 | 0.534 | −0.147 |
Utilization rate of general industrial solid waste | 0.0561 | −0.102 | 0.172 | 0.405 | 0.115 | 0.267 |
Centralized processing rate of sewage treatment plant | 0.272 | 0.0354 | 0.198 | 0.142 | −0.153 | −0.246 |
Harmless treatment rate of household trash | 0.140 | −0.0880 | 0.152 | 0.0542 | −0.270 | −0.447 |
Greening coverage rate of a built-up area | 0.0372 | −0.0175 | 0.00727 | −0.0868 | 0.113 | −0.124 |
Regional per capita GDP | 0.371 | 0.0883 | −0.0602 | 0.0151 | −0.210 | −0.0363 |
Growth rate of regional GDP | −0.0906 | −0.283 | −0.252 | −0.239 | 0.158 | 0.112 |
Average annual salary of employees | 0.310 | 0.179 | 0.231 | 0.113 | −0.218 | −0.147 |
Proportion of science and technology in financial expenditure | 0.286 | −0.0518 | 0.173 | 0.130 | 0.0221 | 0.138 |
Proportion of education in financial expenditure | −0.0925 | −0.0440 | 0.312 | 0.219 | 0.0664 | 0.315 |
Proportion of output value of primary industry | −0.342 | 0.217 | 0.0743 | 0.269 | −0.0293 | −0.184 |
Proportion of output value of secondary industry | 0.212 | −0.439 | −0.141 | −0.151 | 0.0171 | −0.156 |
Proportion of output value of tertiary industry | 0.142 | 0.343 | 0.104 | −0.135 | 0.0136 | 0.463 |
Population density | 0.0885 | −0.351 | 0.341 | 0.146 | 0.235 | 0.0562 |
Natural growth rate of population | 0.00367 | −0.226 | 0.296 | −0.120 | −0.220 | 0.201 |
Public buses (electric vehicles) /10,000 persons | 0.179 | 0.247 | −0.0507 | −0.0863 | 0.115 | 0.0560 |
Public library collection/100 persons | 0.247 | 0.108 | −0.145 | −0.163 | −0.162 | 0.219 |
the number of doctors/10,000 persons | 0.247 | 0.218 | −0.331 | 0.0842 | −0.135 | 0.149 |
Proportion of employed population in the primary industry | −0.178 | 0.168 | −0.268 | 0.465 | 0.0289 | −0.0795 |
Proportion of employed population in the secondary industry | 0.283 | −0.284 | −0.203 | 0.169 | 0.0549 | 0.0937 |
Proportion of employed population In the tertiary industry | −0.168 | 0.175 | 0.372 | −0.463 | −0.0729 | −0.0427 |
Index Variable | PC7 | PC8 | PC9 | PC10 | PC11 | PC12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emission of GRP industrial dust /CNY 100 million | −0.333 | 0.0121 | 0.493 | 0.537 | 0.299 | −0.187 |
Emission of GRP industrial sulfur dioxide/CNY 100 million | 0.132 | −0.0463 | 0.000340 | −0.237 | −0.0222 | 0.0940 |
Emission of GRP industrial wastewater/CNY 10,000 | 0.0545 | −0.124 | 0.0833 | −0.0654 | −0.267 | 0.165 |
Utilization rate of general industrial solid waste | −0.201 | 0.360 | 0.272 | −0.265 | 0.0847 | 0.297 |
Centralized processing rate of sewage treatment plant | 0.211 | 0.0331 | −0.162 | −0.0513 | −0.0127 | −0.0937 |
Harmless treatment rate of household trash | −0.112 | 0.188 | −0.00261 | −0.276 | 0.448 | 0.0905 |
Greening coverage rate of a built-up area | 0.125 | 0.787 | −0.296 | 0.339 | −0.258 | 0.0723 |
Regional per capita GDP | 0.0845 | 0.0115 | 0.105 | 0.0670 | −0.0348 | −0.126 |
Growth rate of regional GDP | 0.222 | 0.229 | 0.0177 | −0.00868 | 0.423 | −0.110 |
Average annual salary of employees | 0.00459 | −0.0394 | 0.0217 | 0.0701 | −0.187 | 0.0744 |
Proportion of science and technology in financial expenditure | 0.239 | −0.0217 | −0.0692 | 0.217 | 0.105 | −0.466 |
Proportion of education in financial expenditure | 0.492 | −0.103 | 0.0771 | 0.0965 | 0.137 | −0.0873 |
Proportion of output value of primary industry | −0.0258 | 0.0188 | −0.00613 | 0.0327 | 0.0288 | −0.0398 |
Proportion of output value of secondary industry | 0.233 | −0.118 | 0.119 | 0.00727 | −0.0623 | 0.158 |
Proportion of output value of tertiary industry | −0.298 | 0.143 | −0.162 | −0.0522 | 0.0513 | −0.172 |
Population density | −0.0767 | 0.00965 | −0.0174 | −0.00262 | 0.0707 | 0.0453 |
Natural growth rate of population | −0.106 | −0.136 | 0.0425 | 0.444 | −0.0965 | 0.488 |
Public buses (electric vehicles) /10,000 persons | 0.0495 | −0.145 | −0.442 | 0.135 | 0.540 | 0.400 |
Public library collection/100 persons | 0.146 | 0.215 | 0.470 | −0.182 | 0.0278 | 0.0590 |
the number of doctors/10,000 persons | 0.137 | −0.0199 | 0.0924 | 0.0902 | 0.00286 | 0.234 |
Proportion of employed population in the primary industry | 0.238 | 0.0422 | 0.121 | 0.213 | 0.0534 | 0.157 |
Proportion of employed population in the secondary industry | −0.329 | −0.0777 | −0.204 | −0.0109 | −0.0489 | −0.141 |
Proportion of employed population In the tertiary industry | 0.176 | 0.0504 | 0.126 | −0.124 | 0.0147 | 0.0405 |
Rule Layer | Index Layer | Index Weight (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Evaluation index system of green development for coal-resource-exhausted cities | Resources and the environment (0.354) | Emission of GRP industrial dust /CNY 100 million | 0.062 |
Emission of GRP industrial sulfur dioxide /CNY 100 million | 0.079 | ||
Emission of GRP industrial wastewater /CNY 10,000 | 0.042 | ||
Utilization rate of general industrial solid waste | 0.090 | ||
Centralized processing rate of sewage treatment plant | 0.034 | ||
Harmless treatment rate of household trash | 0.006 | ||
Greening coverage rate of a built-up area | 0.041 | ||
Economic development (0.33) | Regional per capita GDP | 0.039 | |
Growth rate of regional GDP | 0.013 | ||
Average annual salary of employees | 0.052 | ||
Proportion of science and technology in financial expenditure | 0.067 | ||
Proportion of education in financial expenditure | 0.083 | ||
Proportion of output value of primary industry | 0.011 | ||
Proportion of output value of secondary industry | 0.025 | ||
Proportion of output value of tertiary industry | 0.049 | ||
Population, social welfare (0.308) | Population density | 0.038 | |
Natural growth rate of population | 0.021 | ||
Public buses (electric vehicles) /10,000 persons | 0.066 | ||
Public library collection/100 persons | 0.058 | ||
the number of doctors/10,000 persons | 0.054 | ||
Proportion of employed population in the primary industry | 0.043 | ||
Proportion of employed population in the secondary industry | 0.028 | ||
Proportion of employed population in the tertiary industry | 0.000 |
No. | City | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Zhangjiakou | 0.340 | 0.361 | 0.385 | 0.395 | 0.447 | 0.439 | 0.442 | 0.429 | 0.451 | 0.450 | 0.486 |
2 | Chengde | 0.358 | 0.351 | 0.419 | 0.465 | 0.429 | 0.420 | 0.462 | 0.423 | 0.434 | 0.433 | 0.452 |
3 | Linfen | 0.364 | 0.383 | 0.444 | 0.446 | 0.458 | 0.424 | 0.440 | 0.450 | 0.453 | 0.445 | 0.471 |
4 | Baotou | 0.396 | 0.465 | 0.523 | 0.514 | 0.544 | 0.565 | 0.579 | 0.551 | 0.559 | 0.582 | 0.554 |
5 | Wuhai | 0.354 | 0.409 | 0.420 | 0.428 | 0.482 | 0.499 | 0.496 | 0.499 | 0.556 | 0.532 | 0.570 |
6 | Fushun | 0.390 | 0.415 | 0.424 | 0.430 | 0.431 | 0.440 | 0.455 | 0.458 | 0.450 | 0.463 | 0.479 |
7 | Fuxin | 0.372 | 0.365 | 0.375 | 0.416 | 0.400 | 0.420 | 0.414 | 0.436 | 0.424 | 0.428 | 0.448 |
8 | Chaoyang | 0.347 | 0.336 | 0.379 | 0.411 | 0.356 | 0.385 | 0.418 | 0.419 | 0.420 | 0.438 | 0.439 |
9 | Changchun | 0.443 | 0.460 | 0.493 | 0.484 | 0.512 | 0.555 | 0.525 | 0.561 | 0.576 | 0.577 | 0.568 |
10 | Jilin | 0.376 | 0.406 | 0.441 | 0.461 | 0.480 | 0.466 | 0.481 | 0.483 | 0.506 | 0.518 | 0.493 |
11 | Liaoyuan | 0.385 | 0.457 | 0.427 | 0.467 | 0.475 | 0.486 | 0.450 | 0.482 | 0.500 | 0.490 | 0.494 |
12 | Tonghua | 0.393 | 0.389 | 0.454 | 0.410 | 0.456 | 0.456 | 0.468 | 0.499 | 0.542 | 0.513 | 0.524 |
13 | Hegang | 0.430 | 0.405 | 0.462 | 0.466 | 0.454 | 0.464 | 0.470 | 0.463 | 0.480 | 0.467 | 0.467 |
14 | Shuangyashan | 0.408 | 0.412 | 0.459 | 0.467 | 0.437 | 0.425 | 0.423 | 0.349 | 0.439 | 0.455 | 0.532 |
15 | Qitaihe | 0.405 | 0.414 | 0.448 | 0.442 | 0.414 | 0.427 | 0.436 | 0.463 | 0.458 | 0.461 | 0.444 |
16 | Xuzhou | 0.464 | 0.477 | 0.508 | 0.514 | 0.518 | 0.526 | 0.525 | 0.558 | 0.588 | 0.597 | 0.601 |
17 | Huaibei | 0.443 | 0.443 | 0.483 | 0.502 | 0.497 | 0.527 | 0.536 | 0.538 | 0.530 | 0.543 | 0.532 |
18 | Pingxiang | 0.389 | 0.405 | 0.435 | 0.438 | 0.438 | 0.448 | 0.465 | 0.478 | 0.511 | 0.538 | 0.534 |
19 | Zibo | 0.478 | 0.490 | 0.560 | 0.567 | 0.552 | 0.574 | 0.600 | 0.605 | 0.625 | 0.617 | 0.629 |
20 | Zaozhuang | 0.432 | 0.451 | 0.483 | 0.502 | 0.507 | 0.522 | 0.523 | 0.521 | 0.528 | 0.546 | 0.550 |
21 | Tai’an | 0.444 | 0.480 | 0.510 | 0.560 | 0.513 | 0.519 | 0.530 | 0.536 | 0.559 | 0.560 | 0.577 |
22 | Jiaozuo | 0.407 | 0.414 | 0.457 | 0.473 | 0.498 | 0.512 | 0.509 | 0.506 | 0.523 | 0.532 | 0.529 |
23 | Jingzhou | 0.407 | 0.414 | 0.441 | 0.462 | 0.461 | 0.502 | 0.462 | 0.462 | 0.427 | 0.452 | 0.476 |
24 | Hengyang | 0.378 | 0.387 | 0.418 | 0.440 | 0.435 | 0.453 | 0.464 | 0.472 | 0.477 | 0.498 | 0.506 |
25 | Chenzhou | 0.399 | 0.385 | 0.413 | 0.433 | 0.456 | 0.464 | 0.465 | 0.473 | 0.482 | 0.510 | 0.528 |
26 | Loudi | 0.407 | 0.386 | 0.420 | 0.391 | 0.433 | 0.444 | 0.442 | 0.480 | 0.482 | 0.476 | 0.491 |
27 | Shaoguan | 0.365 | 0.404 | 0.432 | 0.459 | 0.462 | 0.480 | 0.497 | 0.496 | 0.497 | 0.514 | 0.530 |
28 | Laibin | 0.297 | 0.290 | 0.289 | 0.358 | 0.361 | 0.402 | 0.431 | 0.422 | 0.462 | 0.473 | 0.449 |
29 | Chongqing | 0.422 | 0.402 | 0.448 | 0.457 | 0.444 | 0.504 | 0.467 | 0.466 | 0.513 | 0.519 | 0.520 |
30 | Guang’an | 0.332 | 0.359 | 0.401 | 0.414 | 0.427 | 0.455 | 0.454 | 0.468 | 0.461 | 0.447 | 0.475 |
31 | Tongchuan | 0.386 | 0.413 | 0.414 | 0.424 | 0.446 | 0.440 | 0.480 | 0.500 | 0.513 | 0.521 | 0.529 |
32 | Lanzhou | 0.481 | 0.517 | 0.559 | 0.556 | 0.549 | 0.561 | 0.574 | 0.595 | 0.547 | 0.562 | 0.587 |
33 | Shizuishan | 0.311 | 0.320 | 0.362 | 0.419 | 0.456 | 0.434 | 0.439 | 0.456 | 0.474 | 0.497 | 0.516 |
No. | City | Rank 2005 | Rank 2010 | Rank 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Zhangjiakou | 30 | 25 | 23 |
2 | Chengde | 27 | 31 | 29 |
3 | Linfen | 26 | 29 | 27 |
4 | Baotou | 16 | 2 | 7 |
5 | Wuhai | 28 | 12 | 5 |
6 | Fushun | 18 | 24 | 24 |
7 | Fuxin | 24 | 30 | 31 |
8 | Chaoyang | 29 | 33 | 33 |
9 | Changchun | 5 | 4 | 6 |
10 | Jilin | 23 | 15 | 21 |
11 | Liaoyuan | 21 | 13 | 20 |
12 | Tonghua | 17 | 18 | 16 |
13 | Hegang | 8 | 17 | 28 |
14 | Shuangyashan | 10 | 28 | 10 |
15 | Qitaihe | 14 | 27 | 32 |
16 | Xuzhou | 3 | 6 | 2 |
17 | Huaibei | 6 | 5 | 11 |
18 | Pingxiang | 19 | 21 | 9 |
19 | Zibo | 2 | 1 | 1 |
20 | Zaozhuang | 7 | 7 | 8 |
21 | Tai’an | 4 | 8 | 4 |
22 | Jiaozuo | 13 | 9 | 14 |
23 | Jingzhou | 12 | 11 | 25 |
24 | Hengyang | 22 | 20 | 19 |
25 | Chenzhou | 15 | 16 | 15 |
26 | Loudi | 11 | 22 | 22 |
27 | Shaoguan | 25 | 14 | 12 |
28 | Laibin | 33 | 32 | 30 |
29 | Chongqing | 9 | 10 | 17 |
30 | Guang’an | 31 | 19 | 26 |
31 | Tongchuan | 20 | 23 | 13 |
32 | Lanzhou | 1 | 3 | 3 |
33 | Shizuishan | 32 | 26 | 18 |
Level of Green Development | One Star | Two Stars | Three Stars | Four Stars |
---|---|---|---|---|
Score of green development | [0, 0.424] | [0.424, 0.461] | [0.461, 0.508] | [0.508, 1] |
Representation state | Poor | Commonly | Good | Excellent |
Criterion Layer Indexand Obstacle Degree | Obstacle Factors | Obstacle Code | Obstacle Degree |
---|---|---|---|
Resources and the environment (21.59%) | Emission of GRP industrial dust /CNY 100 million | C1 | 0.20% |
Emission of GRP industrial sulfur dioxide /CNY 100 million | C2 | 1.27% | |
Emission of GRP industrial wastewater /CNY 10,000 | C3 | 0.29% | |
Utilization rate of general industrial solid waste | C4 | 8.81% | |
Centralized processing rate of sewage treatment plant | C5 | 2.06% | |
Harmless treatment rate of household trash | C6 | 0.72% | |
Greening coverage rate of a built-up area | C7 | 8.23% | |
Regional per capita GDP | C8 | 6.16% | |
Economic development (38.88%) | Growth rate of regional GDP | C9 | 0.84% |
Average annual salary of employees | C10 | 5.98% | |
Proportion of science and technology in financial expenditure | C11 | 9.75% | |
Proportion of education in financial expenditure | C12 | 6.55% | |
Proportion of output value of the primary industry | C13 | 1.43% | |
Proportion of output value of the secondary industry | C14 | 2.02% | |
Proportion of output value of the tertiary industry | C15 | 6.16% | |
Population’s social welfare (39.53%) | Population density | C16 | 4.45% |
Natural growth rate of population | C17 | 2.52% | |
Public buses (electric vehicles) /10,000 persons | C18 | 8.34% | |
Public library collection/100 persons | C19 | 7.52% | |
The number of doctors/10,000 persons | C20 | 7.33% | |
Proportion of employed population in the primary industry | C21 | 7.00% | |
Proportion of employed population in the secondary industry | C22 | 2.36% | |
Proportion of employed population in the tertiary industry | C23 | 0.01% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhuang, X.; Li, X.; Xu, Y. How Can Resource-Exhausted Cities Get Out of “The Valley of Death”? An Evaluation Index System and Obstacle Degree Analysis of Green Sustainable Development. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416976
Zhuang X, Li X, Xu Y. How Can Resource-Exhausted Cities Get Out of “The Valley of Death”? An Evaluation Index System and Obstacle Degree Analysis of Green Sustainable Development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(24):16976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416976
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhuang, Xinyu, Xin Li, and Yisong Xu. 2022. "How Can Resource-Exhausted Cities Get Out of “The Valley of Death”? An Evaluation Index System and Obstacle Degree Analysis of Green Sustainable Development" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 24: 16976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416976
APA StyleZhuang, X., Li, X., & Xu, Y. (2022). How Can Resource-Exhausted Cities Get Out of “The Valley of Death”? An Evaluation Index System and Obstacle Degree Analysis of Green Sustainable Development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416976