Next Article in Journal
Aerobic Degradation Characteristics and Mechanism of Decabromodiphenyl Ether (BDE-209) Using Complex Bacteria Communities
Next Article in Special Issue
Nutritional Status and Sarcopenia in Nursing Home Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Acute Judo Training on Countermovement Jump Performance and Perceived Fatigue among Collegiate Athletes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Promoting the Integration of Elderly Healthcare and Elderly Nursing: Evidence from the Chinese Government
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Self-Rated Health and Life Satisfaction among Elderly Migrants in China: A Moderated Mediation Model of Resilience and Upward Intergenerational Support

1
School of Health Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
2
School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
3
School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(24), 17009; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417009
Submission received: 17 November 2022 / Revised: 15 December 2022 / Accepted: 15 December 2022 / Published: 18 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Healthy Aging)

Abstract

:
Objective: This study aimed to test whether resilience mediates the association between self-rated health and life satisfaction and the moderated effect of upward intergenerational support among elderly migrants in China. Method: We used self-reported data collected from 654 elderly migrants in Nanjing. The regression analysis using bootstrapping methods was conducted to explore the mediating and moderating effects. Results: Resilience mediated the relationship between self-rated health and life satisfaction among elderly migrants in China. The moderated mediation analysis indicated that the upward intergenerational support moderated the path between self-rated health and resilience. Specifically, compared with those with a low level of emotional support, the self-rated health of elderly migrants with a high level of emotional support has a stronger effect on resilience. Moreover, the self-rated health of elderly migrants with a low level of financial support has a stronger effect on resilience than those with a higher level of financial support. Conclusion: Resilience could partially mediate the effect of self-rated health on life satisfaction among elderly migrants in China, and upward intergenerational support moderated the indirect relationship between self-rated health and life satisfaction via resilience.

1. Introduction

Life satisfaction is defined as an individual’s subjective judgment about his/her quality of personal life [1]. In previous studies, life satisfaction has been taken as an indicator of one’s subjective well-being [2]. In the context of urbanization, an increasing number of rural elderlies migrate to cities to live with their children, mainly for grandparenting. Confronted with various challenges in a new environment, this elderly population may develop mental problems that decrease their life satisfaction. Mounting gerontological studies themed on life satisfaction have been conducted in China, but few have analyzed the life satisfaction of elderly migrants. Hence, the factors influencing life satisfaction and their mechanisms should be clarified to design effective interventions to increase the life satisfaction of elderly migrants in China.

1.1. Self-Rated Health and Life Satisfaction

Self-rated health is the health status evaluated by an individual with a combination of subjective and objective (not only objective) indicators [3]. For the elderly, improving their physical capacity can increase their life satisfaction [4]. The impact of self-rated health on life satisfaction has been confirmed in recent studies [5,6]. Several studies have found that there is a significantly positive association between self-rated health and life satisfaction [7,8,9]. This association has also been confirmed among Chinese elderly migrants [10]. However, little is known about the potential mechanisms linking them. Thus, in this study, we aimed to screen the factors mediating this association and related mechanisms.

1.2. Self-Rated Health, Resilience and Life Satisfaction

Resilience is an individual’s capacity to deal with and recover from significant adversities, such as stress and trauma [11]. The resilience framework thinks that resilience is a dynamic course that can drive a person to grow in the face of adversities [12]. It helps to avoid stress-induced mental disorders, such as depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and anxiety [13,14]. In past studies, researchers have found that resilience is an important mediating variable, which plays a crucial role in explaining the relationship between some adverse events and physical and mental health. Empirical evidence has demonstrated the association between self-rated health and resilience [15,16,17]. People with better self-rated health tend to have more energy and the ability to deal with life adversities and recover from them. Several cross-sectional studies have revealed a positive association between self-rated health and resilience [18,19,20]. In addition, a longitudinal study has confirmed better self-rated health as the protective factor of resilience after a three-year follow-up [21].
Previous studies have also found a significant association between resilience and life satisfaction. Individuals with a stronger resilience achieve better life satisfaction, appearing more peaceful and happier than those with a weaker resilience [11,22]. Empirical studies reach the consensus that resilience exerts a positive effect on life satisfaction [23,24], and the association is consistent across samples with diverse backgrounds [25]. Based on these findings, some researchers have further investigated the relations among self-rated health, resilience, and life satisfaction [19]. In these studies, resilience is often regarded as a covariable, moderator [26], or a mediator [24,25], and they have found that resilience plays a crucial role in the relationship between self-rated health and life satisfaction. However, no research has examined the mediating role of resilience between self-rated health and life satisfaction among elderly migrants, which may be important in improving elderly migrants’ life satisfaction.

1.3. Self-Rated Health, Upward Intergenerational Support, and Resilience

In China, intergenerational support is closely related to the health of the elderly, especially “upward” intergenerational support [27]. Upward intergenerational support refers to the instrumental, financial, or emotional support that elderly parents receive from their adult children. A cross-sectional survey has shown that intergenerational support from children has a significant effect on the self-rated physical health and psychological health of elderly parents in rural China [28]. Lower emotional or instrumental support from children reduces the level of self-rated health and increases depressive symptoms in older adults [29]. Among all combinations of support, emotional support is the most effective in improving parents’ psychological health [30]. Older adults who receive higher levels of support from children in processing household chores tend to experience improvement in self-rated health [31]. Older adults who receive intergenerational support have higher levels of self-rated health, which consequently enhances mental and physical resilience. In other words, the direct relationship between self-rated health and resilience is stronger in elderly migrants with high levels of upward intergenerational support. However, no previous studies have examined whether upward intergenerational support is a promoting factor that moderates the relationship between self-rated health and resilience.

1.4. The Present Study

In the current study, we first tested whether resilience mediates the relationship between self-rated health and life satisfaction among elderly migrants in China. Second, we explored whether upward intergenerational support moderates the association between self-rated health and resilience. Based on the literature review, we proposed the following hypotheses developed the model (Figure 1):
Hypothesis 1. 
Self-rated health is positively correlated with life satisfaction.
Hypothesis 2. 
Resilience mediates the relationship between self-rated health and life satisfaction.
Hypothesis 3. 
The mediation path from self-rated health to life satisfaction via resilience is moderated by upward intergenerational support.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants and Sampling

This research was carried out in Nanjing (Jiangsu, China) in 2020. Nanjing has a developed economy, with the Gross Domestic Product per capita of about 159,300 (RMB, yuan) in 2020. Included were the elderly migrants aged 60 years and above who had moved to live in Nanjing for no more than 10 years and had not changed their Hukou (household registration in China) to Nanjing.
This survey randomly selected 7 districts in Nanjing (Qinhuai, Qixia, Gulou, Xuanwu, Jianye, Yuhuatai, and Jiangning District), then randomly selected 3 communities in each district, and finally recruited elderly migrants who met the inclusion criteria in these 21 communities. All participants were informed of the purpose of the study and volunteered to participate in, and a total of 654 valid questionnaires were obtained.

2.2. Measures

An independent variable was self-rated health, and a dependent variable was life satisfaction. The study also assessed resilience as a mediating variable and intergenerational support as a moderating variable. Control variables included age, gender, education level, and personality.

2.2.1. Self-Rated Health

Self-rated health was assessed by an 8-item short-form survey (SF-8) in two dimensions. Four items, including general health (GH), physical function (PF), role physical (RP), and bodily pain (BP), were measured to indicate physical component summary (PCS). The other 4 items, including Energy/fatigue (vitality, VT), social functioning (SF), role limitations due to emotional problems (role emotional, RE), and psychological distress and well-being (mental health, MH), were measured to indicate mental component summary (MCS) [32,33]. Each of those eight items was written into a question that was asked to be answered within four weeks. We recorded the responses on five or six-point Likert scale for the eight items. For both dimensions, a higher score indicated better health. Alternate form reliability for the eight items ranged from 0.70 to 0.88. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.862, indicating good reliability of SF-8 survey.

2.2.2. Life Satisfaction

Life satisfaction was assessed by the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) including 5 items [34] (“in most ways my life is close to my ideal”, “the conditions of my life are excellent”, “I am satisfied with my life”, “so far I have gotten the important things I want in my life”, “if I could live my life over, I would change almost nothing”), with 7 choices available for each item rated on a scale of 1 (strongly degree) to 7 (strongly disagree). The total score ranged from 5 to 35. A higher score indicated a higher degree of life satisfaction. In this sample, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.911, demonstrating good internal reliability of the scale.

2.2.3. Resilience

Resilience was measured by a 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10). The scale was composed of 10 items: “can adapt to change”, “can deal with whatever comes”, “can see humorous side of problems”, “can cope with stress can strengthen me”, “can recover from illness or hardship”, “can achieve goals despite obstacles”, “can stay focused under pressure”, “cannot be easily discouraged by failure”, “can think of self as strong person”, “can handle unpleasant feelings” [35]. Respondents rated these items on a 5-point scale from 1 (not true at all) to 5 (true nearly all the time) [36]. The total score ranged from 10 to 50. A higher score indicated stronger resilience. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.922, indicating good reliability of the sample.

2.2.4. Intergenerational Support

Intergenerational support was assessed in three dimensions: emotional, financial, and instrumental support. Emotional support was upward, referring to the support that the elderly migrants received from their children. Financial support was upward, and instrumental support was downward, both referring to intergenerational support.
Emotional support was measured by three questions based on the Intergenerational Solidarity Inventory [37]: (a) “Did you feel emotionally close to your child?”; (b) “Is this child willing to communicate with you in terms of your worries and troubles?”; and (c) “Did you get along with this child?” [38]. For each question, the answers were scored from 0 to 2 (0 = not at all, 1 = somewhat, 2 = very much). The summed score represented the level of emotional support (range = 2–8; Cronbach’s alpha = 0.73).
Financial support was assessed by two questions: “How much financial support did you provide your child in the past 12 months?”, “How much financial support did you receive from your child in the past 12 months?” [39]. The answer was rearranged into two categories: 0 = <10,000 RMB, 1 = ≥10,000 RMB.
Instrumental support was assessed by two questions: “How often have you helped the child do housework or care tasks in the past 12 months, such as cleaning, washing and taking care of grandchildren?”, “How often has this child helped you do housework or care tasks in the past 12 months?” [40,41]. The answer was rearranged into two categories: 0 = none or occasionally, 1 = often.

2.2.5. Sociodemographic Factors

Age (60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75+ years), gender (0 = female, 1 = male), education level (0 = illiteracy, 1 = elementary school, 2 = junior middle school, 3 = senior middle school, 4 = college and above), yearly income (0 = less than 5000 RMB, 1 = 5000–9999, 2 = 10,000–19,999, 3 = 20,000–39,999, 4 = 40,000–79,999, 5 = 80,000–119,999, 6 = more than 120,000 RMB) and Hukou (0 = urban, 1 = rural) were included as control variables in all models in this study because they had potential influence to other variables.

2.3. Data Analysis

In this study, descriptive statistics and distributions were examined for all the variables. Harman’s one-way test and confirmatory factor analysis were used to evaluate method bias. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to verify the correlation between variables. The hierarchical linear regression analyses were performed to test the mediating effect of resilience. All analyses were run on SPSS 23 PROCESS plugin was used to analyze the mediating and moderating effects. PROCESS is an observed variable OLS and logistic regression path analysis modeling tool. It is widely used through the social, business, and health sciences for estimating direct and indirect effects in single and multiple mediator models (parallel and serial), two- and three-way interactions in moderation models, along with simple slopes and regions of significance for probing interactions, and conditional indirect effects in moderated mediation models with a single or multiple mediators or moderators (The PROCESS macro for SPSS, SAS and R).

3. Results

3.1. Sample Characteristics

Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of the sample. Of the 654 participants, most were women (67%), aged 60–70 years (78.1%), had a lower income (38.1%), a rural Hukou (69.3%), a married status (84.6%), and an education level of elementary school and below (54.1%). Most of them were working (88.2%) and had migrated to Nanjing to care for their children and grandchildren (77.4%).

3.2. Bivariate Relationships among Key Variables

Table 2 presents the descriptive variables. Self-rated health correlated strongly with resilience and life satisfaction, and resilience correlated strongly with life satisfaction.
Emotional support and financial support correlated strongly with resilience, and instrumental support (downward) also correlated with resilience, but instrumental support (upward) did not correlate with resilience.

3.3. Mediation Analyses

In testing our first and second hypotheses, a mediational analysis was conducted by PROCESS Model 4. As shown in Table 3, self-rated health was directly associated with resilience (β = 0.377, p < 0.01), and resilience was directly associated with life satisfaction (β = 0.307, p < 0.01). The association between self-rated health and life satisfaction was also significant (β = 0.217, p < 0.01), which can confirm our first hypothesis. We also found a significant indirect effect of self-rated health on life satisfaction via resilience. The bootstrapping results indicated an indirect effect (β = 0.116, 95%CI: [0.081, 0.154]). The indirect effect accounted for 34.9% of the total effect, suggesting that resilience played an evident mediating role in the association between self-rated health and life satisfaction. These findings supported our second study hypothesis.

3.4. Moderated Mediation Analyses

In order to test our third hypothesis, a moderated mediation analysis was conducted by PROCESS Model 7. As intergenerational support has three types, we set five moderator variables in the models, including emotional support, financial support (upward and downward), and instrumental support (upward and downward). Table 4 shows the results of the moderated mediation analysis. The effect of the interaction between self-rated health and emotional support on resilience was positive and statistically significant (β = 0.086, p < 0.05). In terms of bi-directional financial and instrumental support, only the interaction between self-rated health and financial support (upward) had a significant negative effect (β = −0.222, p < 0.05) on resilience among elderly migrants [41].
Figure 2 illustrates the interaction at high (M + SD) and low (M − SD) levels of self-rated health and emotional support. The plots show the interaction between self-rated health and emotional support on resilience, suggesting a stronger positive association between self-rated health and resilience in the elderly migrants at a higher emotional support level compared with those at a lower emotional support level. Figure 3 illustrates the effect of the interaction between self-rated health and financial support (upward) on resilience. The plots show the interaction between self-rated health and financial support (upward), suggesting a negative association between self-rated health and resilience in the elderly migrant at a higher level of upward financial support (≥10,000 RMB), compared with those at a lower level (<10,000 RMB).
In addition, the moderated mediation indexes [42] were also calculated. Table 4 shows the total moderated mediation effect. When emotional support was used as a moderator, the indirect effect was significant (95%CI: 0.003, 0.046), indicating that the indirect effect of self-rated health and life satisfaction through resilience was moderated by emotional support, and when financial support (upward) was used as a moderator, the indirect effect was also significant (95%CI: −0.123, −0.015), indicating that the indirect effect of self-rated health and life satisfaction through resilience was moderated by financial support (upward).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we verified that resilience plays a mediating role in the relationship between self-rated health and life satisfaction among elderly migrants in China. As expected, high levels of self-rated health and resilience were positively associated with life satisfaction. Furthermore, we also revealed the partial mediating effects of resilience on the path from self-rated health to life satisfaction. Moreover, upward intergenerational support moderated the indirect relationship between self-rated health and life satisfaction via resilience.

4.1. Self-Rated Health and Life Satisfaction

In line with Hypothesis 1, better self-rated health was associated with a higher level of life satisfaction among the elderly migrants. A plausible explanation for this finding is that elderly migrants with better self-rated health have stronger health self-efficacy. Health self-efficacy can improve the self-confidence of elderly migrants to cope with setbacks so as to improve their life satisfaction. The main reasons for their migration in this study include grandparenting and decreasing the life pressure of their children [43]. Moreover, most of the elderly migrate from rural areas, with a low education level and less knowledge about basic public health services. Most of them have not even established their health records [44] and have poor health consciousness [45]. On the other hand, due to the difference in healthcare policies between regions [46], many elderly migrants do not seek treatment actively when they become sick. As a result, the utilization rate of medical services is low among elderly migrants. If they become sick and have to be cared for by their children, they may lose self-efficacy and even develop psychological disorders, such as depression and anxiety, that can reduce life satisfaction. In China, the community has the responsibility to establish health records or cards for elderly migrants so as to monitor their health status [47]. Medical policies have been released to reduce inequality in public health services between regions [43].

4.2. Mediating Role of Resilience

This study found that resilience could partially mediate the effect of self-rated health on life satisfaction among elderly migrants, which verifies our Hypothesis 2 and echoes the conclusions of other researchers [19]. This indicates that even if the elderly migrants have poor self-rated health, their resilience still helps them to cope with the negative factors of life satisfaction. Previous studies have shown that elderly migrants are at a higher risk of health problems than local-resident elderlies [48,49,50]. For instance, they are vulnerable to residential segregation, communicable and sexually transmitted diseases, policy inequality, and occupational injuries and diseases [49,51]. Their health status decreases with the increase in age and flow dilemma. However, psychological resilience can protect them from the sense of maladaptation caused by poor physique, pressure, and frustration and maintain a good mental state. A strong resilience is conducive for the elderly migrants to take active actions to adjust their physical and mental state. Physical and mental health also has a great effect on life satisfaction. The present study showed that life satisfaction is more affected by the resilience to cope with adversities in elderly migrants. Therefore, effective efforts should be taken to enhance the resilience of elderly migrants in China.

4.3. Moderating Role of Upward Intergenerational Support

We found that the mediation path from self-rated health to life satisfaction via resilience was moderated by upward intergenerational support, which proves Hypothesis 3. A higher level of upward intergenerational support predicted a greater effect of self-rated health on resilience. Our results supported the resource conservation theory of Hobfoll [52]. Moreover, compared with that in the elderly migrants at a lower level of emotional support, the self-rated health had a significantly stronger effect on resilience in those at a higher level, and compared with that in the elderly migrants at a higher level of financial support, the self-rated health had a significantly stronger effect on resilience in those at a lower level.
For the elderly having migrated into a new environment, failure of social integration negatively affects their self-rated health and life satisfaction [53,54]. One’s active adaptation to old age directly depends on his/her ability to acquire resources [55], which in turn affects the level of physical health and resilience. Emotional support from their children can reduce loneliness and depression in elderly migrants [56] and enhance their abilities to cope with loneliness, depression, anxiety, and other negative emotions [30,57]. Financial support from children is the main source of income for elderly migrants. However, excessive financial support may pose a psychological burden on the elderly. Therefore, appropriate financial support is needed to strengthen the ability of elderly migrants to acquire medical services [58] and improve their physical health. In general, the negative effects of age and migration on the self-rated health of elderly migrants can be buffered by upward generational support, either financial or emotional. A harmonious intergenerational relationship is needed to guarantee this support.

5. Conclusions

Our study shows that self-rated health is positively correlated with life satisfaction among elderly migrants in China; resilience mediates the relationship between self-rated health and life satisfaction; the mediation path from self-rated health to life satisfaction via resilience is moderated by upward intergenerational support. Given these conclusions, we make the following recommendations. First of all, the government should pay attention to the health level of elderly migrants, set up mechanisms to let them enroll in the family doctor contract service in urban communities, improve access to medical services in different places and make it easier for these people to seek medical treatment in cities, improve the policies about the off-site medical treatment which can make the elderly migrants receive medical treatment conveniently. Secondly, the children should strengthen their emotional communication with their parents, care about them, and often chat with them instead of giving them more money, making the elderly migrants feel more emotional support, which is good for improving elderly migrants’ life satisfaction.

6. Limitation and Future Studies

First, this is a cross-sectional survey, which cannot find the causal relationships between variables. In the future, we will conduct longitudinal studies focusing on elderly migrants’ life satisfaction. Second, some other variables may mediate the association between self-rated health and life satisfaction, such as loneliness, anxiety, depression, etc. In future studies, we will further analyze the effects of these variables. Lastly, all the participants were recruited from Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. Multi-center studies are needed in the future to examine the findings of this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z. and J.Y.; methodology, L.Z. and Y.H.; formal analysis, L.Z. and Y.H.; investigation, Y.H. and H.W.; data curation, L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z. and Y.H.; writing—review and editing, L.Z., Y.H., J.Y. and H.W.; supervision, J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 72004103) and National Social Science Foundation of China (grant No. 18BRK026). The APC was funded by 72004103.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Medical ethics approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Medical University (2020-571).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analysed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Diener, E.; Emmons, R.A.; Larsen, R.J.; Griffin, S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J. Pers. Assess. 1985, 49, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bukenya, J.O. An Analysis of Quality of Life, Income Distribution and Rural Development in West Virginia; West Virginia University: Morgantown, WV, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fylkesnes, K.; Jakobsen, M.D.; Henriksen, N.O. The value of general health perception in health equity research: A community-based cohort study of long-term mortality risk (Finnmark cohort study 1987–2017). SSM Popul. Health 2021, 15, 100848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fukumori, N.; Yamamoto, Y.; Takegami, M.; Yamazaki, S.; Onishi, Y.; Sekiguchi, M.; Otani, K.; Konno, S.; Kikuchi, S.; Fukuhara, S. Association between hand-grip strength and depressive symptoms: Locomotive Syndrome and Health Outcomes in Aizu Cohort Study (LOHAS). Age Ageing 2015, 44, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Angoorani, P.; Mahmoodi, Z.; Ejtahed, H.S.; Heshmat, R.; Motlagh, M.E.; Qorbani, M.; Kelishadi, R. Determinants of life satisfaction and self-rated health in Iranian children and adolescents: A structure equation model. BMC Pediatr. 2022, 22, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Atienza-González, F.L.; Martínez, N.; Silva, C. Life Satisfaction and Self-rated Health in Adolescents: The Relationships between them and the Role of Gender and Age. Span J. Psychol. 2020, 23, e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, E.S.; Delaney, S.W.; Tay, L.; Chen, Y.; Diener, E.D.; Vanderweele, T.J. Life Satisfaction and Subsequent Physical, Behavioral, and Psychosocial Health in Older Adults. Milbank Q. 2021, 99, 209–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Matud, M.P.; García, M.C.; Fortes, D. Relevance of Gender and Social Support in Self-Rated Health and Life Satisfaction in Elderly Spanish People. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Qazi, S.L.; Koivumaa-Honkanen, H.; Rikkonen, T.; Sund, R.; Kröger, H.; Isanejad, M.; Sirola, J. Physical capacity, subjective health, and life satisfaction in older women: A 10-year follow-up study. BMC Geriatr. 2021, 21, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, W.; Wu, Q.; Yang, X.; He, X.; An, X. Migrant elders in Hainan, China, report better health and lower depression than local-born elderly residents. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2017, 44, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fletcher, D.; Sarkar, M. Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. Eur. Psychol. 2013, 18, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumpfer, K.L. Factors and processes contributing to resilience In Resilience and Development; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kalisch, R.; Müller, M.B.; Tüscher, O.A. conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behav. Brain Sci. 2015, 38, e92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, H.; Zhang, C.; Ji, Y.; Yang, L. Biological and Psychological Perspectives of Resilience: Is It Possible to Improve Stress Resistance? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Isobe, A.; Izumi, M.; Akifusa, S. Relationship Between Resilience and Self-Rated Health in Dental Hygiene Students and Registered Dental Hygienists. J. Dent. Educ. 2018, 82, 1343–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Linnemann, P.; Berger, K.; Teismann, H. Associations Between Outcome Resilience and Sociodemographic Factors, Childhood Trauma, Personality Dimensions and Self-Rated Health in Middle-Aged Adults. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2022, 29, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wattick, R.A.; Hagedorn, R.L.; Olfert, M.D. Impact of resilience on college student mental health during COVID-19. J. Am. Coll. Health 2021, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dageid, W.; Grønlie, A.A. The associations between resilience, social capital and self-rated health among HIV-positive South Africans. J. Health Psychol. 2015, 20, 1463–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gu, D.; Feng, Q. Psychological Resilience of Chinese Centenarians and Its Associations with Survival and Health: A Fuzzy Set Analysis. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2018, 73, 880–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lau, S.Y.Z.; Guerra, R.O.; Barbosa, J.F.S.; Phillips, S.P. Impact of resilience on health in older adults: A cross-sectional analysis from the International Mobility in Aging Study (IMIAS). BMJ Open 2018, 8, e023779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Šolcová, I.; Kebza, V.; Kodl, M.; Kernová, V. Self-reported Health Status Predicting Resilience and Burnout in Longitudinal Study. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 2017, 25, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Gizir, C. Psikolojik sağlamlık, risk faktörleri ve koruyucu faktörler üzerine bir derleme çalışması. Turk. Psychol. Couns. Guid. J. 2007, 3, 113–128. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gundogan, S. The mediator role of the fear of COVID-19 in the relationship between psychological resilience and life satisfaction. Curr. Psychol. 2021, 40, 6291–6299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shi, M.; Liu, L.; Sun, X.; Wang, L. Associations between symptoms of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder and life satisfaction in medical students: The mediating effect of resilience. BMC Med. Educ. 2018, 18, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shi, M.; Wang, X.; Bian, Y.; Wang, L. The mediating role of resilience in the relationship between stress and life satisfaction among Chinese medical students: A cross-sectional study. BMC Med. Educ. 2015, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Zhang, K.; Zhang, W.; Wu, B.; Liu, S. Anxiety about aging, resilience and health Status among Chinese older adults: Findings from Honolulu and Wuhan. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2020, 88, 104015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shu, Z.; Xiao, J.; Dai, X.; Han, Y.; Liu, Y. Effect of family "upward" intergenerational support on the health of rural elderly in China: Evidence from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liang, J.; Zhang, P.; Zhu, X.; Qiao, Y.; Zhao, L.; He, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liang, Y. Effect of intergenerational and intragenerational support on perceived health of older adults: A population-based analysis in rural China. Fam. Pract. 2014, 31, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zunzunegui, M.V.; Béland, F.; Otero, A. Support from children, living arrangements, self-rated health and depressive symptoms of older people in Spain. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 30, 1090–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Huang, F.; Fu, P. Intergenerational support and subjective wellbeing among oldest-old in China: The moderating role of economic status. BMC Geriatr. 2021, 21, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mao, W.; Silverstein, M.; Prindle, J.J.; Chi, I. The Reciprocal Relationship between Instrumental Support from Children and Self-Rated Health among Older Adults over Time in Rural China. J. Aging Health 2020, 32, 1528–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ware, J.; Kosinski, M.; Dewey, J.; Gandek, B.; Ware, J.E.; Kisinski, M. How to Score and Interpret Single-Item Health Status Measures: A Manual for Users of the SF-8™ Health Survey; Quality Metric Incorporated: Lincoln, RI, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  33. Turner-Bowker, D.M.; Bayliss, M.S.; Ware, J.E.; Kosinski, M. Usefulness of the SF-8 Health Survey for comparing the impact of migraine and other conditions. Qual. Life Res. 2003, 12, 1003–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pavot, W.; Diener, E.; Colvin, C.R.; Sandvik, E. Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. J. Pers. Assess. 1991, 57, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Campbell-Sills, L.; Stein, M.B. Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J. Trauma. Stress 2007, 20, 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Connor, K.M.; Davidson, J.R. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress. Anxiety 2003, 18, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mangen, D.J.; Bengtson, V.L.; Landry Jr, P.H. Measurement of Intergenerational Relations; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sun, Q.; Wang, Y.; Lu, N.; Lyu, S. Intergenerational support and depressive symptoms among older adults in rural China: The moderating roles of age, living alone, and chronic diseases. BMC Geriatr. 2022, 22, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Guo, M.; Aranda, M.P.; Silverstein, M. The impact of out-migration on the inter-generational support and psychological wellbeing of older adults in rural China. Ageing Soc. 2009, 29, 1085–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, H.; Xu, L.; Fields, N. Pensions and Depressive Symptoms of Older Adults in China: The Mediating Role of Intergenerational Support. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Chen, J.; Jordan, L.P. Intergenerational support and life satisfaction of young-, old- and oldest-old adults in China. Aging Ment. Health 2018, 22, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hayes, A.F. An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2015, 50, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tang, S.; Long, C.; Wang, R.; Liu, Q.; Feng, D.; Feng, Z. Improving the utilization of essential public health services by Chinese elderly migrants: Strategies and policy implication. J. Glob. Health 2020, 10, 010807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, J. Attributes of Elderly Migrants: Evidence from the 2016 MDSS in China. Popul. J. 2018, 40, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chu, B.; Yu, Y. Health seeking behavior of elderly floating population and the influence factors. Chin. Rural. Health Serv. Adm. 2015, 35, 856–859. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, J.; Ni, B.; Ji, Y.; Wang, Y. Health status and the utilization of basic public health service of the chinese elderly floating population. Mod. Prev. Med. 2017, 44, 3526–3530. [Google Scholar]
  47. Fu, Y.; Lin, W.; Yang, Y.; Du, R.; Gao, D. Analysis of diverse factors influencing the health status as well as medical and health service utilization in the floating elderly of China. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021, 21, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Brothers, T.D.; Theou, O.; Rockwood, K. Frailty and migration in middle-aged and older Europeans. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2014, 58, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Y.; Dijst, M.; Geertman, S. Residential segregation and well-being inequality between local and migrant elderly in shanghai. Habitat Int. 2014, 42, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nishita, C.; Browne, C. Advancing research in transitional care: Challenges of culture, language and health literacy in Asian American and native Hawaiian elders. J. Health Care Poor Underserved 2013, 24, 404–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, D.; Mou, J.; Cheng, J.; Griffiths, S.M. Public health services in Shenzhen: A case study. Public Health 2011, 125, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health, and resilience. In The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping; Folkman, S., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  53. Das, A. Social Integration, Self-Rated Health … and Genes? J. Aging Health 2020, 32, 462–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nakagawa, T.; Hülür, G. Social Integration and Terminal Decline in Life Satisfaction Among Older Japanese. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2020, 75, 2122–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Şahin, D.S.; Özer, Ö.; Yanardağ, M.Z. Perceived social support, quality of life and satisfaction with life in elderly people. Educ. Gerontol. 2019, 45, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jia, Y.H.; Ye, Z.H. Impress of intergenerational emotional support on the depression in non-cohabiting parents. World J. Clin. Cases 2019, 7, 3407–3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Peng, H.; Mao, X.; Lai, D. East or West, home is the best: Effect of intergenerational and social support on the subjective well-being of older adults: A comparison between migrants and local residents in Shenzhen, China. Ageing Int. 2015, 40, 376–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, C.; Han, Q.; Hu, J.; Han, Z.; Yang, H. Impact of intergenerational support and medical expenditures on depression: Evidence from rural older adults in China. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, e840864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Moderated mediation model predicting life satisfaction.
Figure 1. Moderated mediation model predicting life satisfaction.
Ijerph 19 17009 g001
Figure 2. Emotional support moderated the effect of self-rated health on resilience.
Figure 2. Emotional support moderated the effect of self-rated health on resilience.
Ijerph 19 17009 g002
Figure 3. Financial support (upward) moderated the effect of self-rated health on resilience.
Figure 3. Financial support (upward) moderated the effect of self-rated health on resilience.
Ijerph 19 17009 g003
Table 1. Participant Sociodemographic Characteristics.
Table 1. Participant Sociodemographic Characteristics.
Variables Frequency (Number of Participants)Percent of Sample (%)
GenderMale21633.0
Female43867.0
Age60–6428243.1
(years)65–6922935.0
70–7410215.6
≥75416.3
Yearly income<500024938.1
(RMB, yuan)5000–999912619.3
10,000–19,9998713.3
20,000–39,99911217.1
40,000–79,999599.0
>80,000213.2
HukouUrban45369.3
Rural20130.7
Marital statusMarried55384.6
Widow9013.8
Divorced111.7
Education levelIlliteracy16725.5
Elementary school18728.6
Junior middle school15824.2
High middle school10415.9
College and above385.8
Working statusWorking7711.8
Not working57788.2
Migration reasonCaring for children or grandchildren50677.4
Living the life in retirement 8613.1
Working192.9
Others436.6
Table 2. Bivariate correlations among key variables.
Table 2. Bivariate correlations among key variables.
MSD12345678
1. Self health33.0545.5921
2. SWLS26.7405.3720.367 ***1
3. RISC33.0647.5270.330 ***0.514 ***1
4. Emotion9.3531.4060.307 ***0.404 ***0.335 ***1
5. Financial_d0.1160.3210.113 ***0.0180.107 ***0.0451
6. Financial_u0.2550.4360.095 **0.162 ***0.181 ***0.180 ***0.083 **1
7. Instrumental_d0.7260.4460.138 ***0.254 ***0.350 ***0.196 ***0.0510.139 ***1
8. Instrumental_u0.4800.5000.0150.031−0.0160.109−0.005−0.0220.0551
*** p < 0.01; ** p < 0.05; M, mean scores; SD, standard deviation; Self health, self-rated health; SWLS, life satisfaction; RISC, Resilience; Emotion, emotional support (upward); Financial_d, financial support (downward); Financial_u, financial support (upward); Instrumental_d, instrumental support (downward); Instrumental_u, instrumental support (upward).
Table 3. Mediation analysis results about the effect of self-rated health on life satisfaction.
Table 3. Mediation analysis results about the effect of self-rated health on life satisfaction.
βSEtLLCIULCIR2
Outcome variable: RISC
constant6.6534.5101.475−2.20415.5100.194
Self-rated health (X)0.3770.0497.632 ***0.2800.475
Outcome variable: SWLS
constant3.6522.9731.229−2.1859.4900.316
Self-rated health (X)0.2170.0346.377 ***0.1500.283
RISC (M)0.3070.02611.865 ***0.2560.358
Effect of X→M→Y
Total effect0.3320.0369.266 ***0.2620.403
Direct effect0.2170.0346.377 ***0.1500.283
Indirect effect (RISC)0.1160.019 0.0810.154
β, standardized coefficients; SE, standard error; LLCI and ULCI, lower level and upper level of the bias-corrected 95% bootstrap confidence interval; X, self-rated health; Y, life satisfaction; M, resilience; *** p < 0.01.
Table 4. Moderated mediation analysis results about the effect of self-rated health on life satisfaction.
Table 4. Moderated mediation analysis results about the effect of self-rated health on life satisfaction.
βSEtLLCIULCIR2
Outcome variables: RISC
constant19.3823.9244.939 ***11.67727.0880.243
Self-rated health0.2950.0505.909 ***0.1970.393
W11.3000.2056.332 ***0.8971.704
Self-rated health × W10.0860.0332.554 **0.0200.151
constant18.5634.0714.560 ***10.56926.5580.199
Self-rated health0.3820.0497.737 ***0.2850.479
W2_d1.6750.8352.006 **0.0353.315
Self-rated health × W2_d0.0820.1530.357−0.2180.382
constant19.0323.9674.797 ***11.24226.8230.227
Self-rated health0.3520.0497.218 ***0.2560.448
W2_u3.0250.6074.982 ***1.8334.218
Self-rated health × W2_u−0.2220.108−2.050 **−0.434−0.009
constant1.8484.8880.304−8.11311.0820.273
Self-rated health0.4600.0924.981 ***0.2790.642
W3_d10.3583.4722.983 ***3.54117.176
Self-rated health × W3_d−0.1730.106−1.630−0.3810.035
constant6.1574.8701.264−3.40615.7190.194
Self-rated health0.3960.0685.841 ***0.2630.530
W3_u0.9763.2080.304−5.3247.275
Self-rated health × W3_u−0.0380.096−0.402−0.2260.149
Outcome variables: SWLS
constant3.6522.9731.229−2.1959.4900.316
Self-rated health0.2170.0346.377 ***0.1500.283
RISC0.3070.02611.865 ***0.2560.358
Direct effect of X on Y
0.2170.0346.3770.1500.283
Index of moderated mediation
Emotional support0.0260.011 0.0030.046
Financial support (upward)−0.0680.028 −0.123−0.015
*** p < 0.01; ** p < 0.05; W1: emotional support; W2_d: Financial support (downward); W2_u: Financial support (upward); W3_d: Instrumental support (downward); W3_u: Instrumental support (upward).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Hou, Y.; Wang, H.; Yao, J. Self-Rated Health and Life Satisfaction among Elderly Migrants in China: A Moderated Mediation Model of Resilience and Upward Intergenerational Support. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 17009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417009

AMA Style

Zhang L, Hou Y, Wang H, Yao J. Self-Rated Health and Life Satisfaction among Elderly Migrants in China: A Moderated Mediation Model of Resilience and Upward Intergenerational Support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(24):17009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Li, Yanjie Hou, Hao Wang, and Jun Yao. 2022. "Self-Rated Health and Life Satisfaction among Elderly Migrants in China: A Moderated Mediation Model of Resilience and Upward Intergenerational Support" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 24: 17009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop