Next Article in Journal
Current Social Perception of and Value Attached to Nursing Professionals’ Competences: An Integrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Perceived Emotional Intelligence Levels in Nursing Students in Times of a Pandemic: Multivariate Representation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Food-Borne Transmission of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus—Spread, Consequences, and Prophylaxis

by
Alicja M. Buczek
1,
Weronika Buczek
1,
Alicja Buczek
1,* and
Joanna Wysokińska-Miszczuk
2
1
Department of Biology and Parasitology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 11 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
2
Chair and Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medical Dentistry, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 6 St., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1812; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031812
Submission received: 2 January 2022 / Revised: 2 February 2022 / Accepted: 3 February 2022 / Published: 5 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Disease Prevention)

Abstract

:
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is the most common viral neurological disease in Eurasia. It is usually transmitted via tick bites but can also occur through ingestion of TBEV-infected milk and dairy products. The present paper summarises the knowledge of the food-borne TBEV transmission and presents methods for the prevention of its spread. The incidence of milk-borne TBE outbreaks is recorded in central, eastern, and north-eastern Europe, where Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes persulcatus, and/or Dermacentor reticulatus ticks, i.e., the main vectors of TBEV, occur abundantly. The growing occurrence range and population size of these ticks increases the risk of infection of dairy animals, i.e., goats, sheep, and cows, with viruses transmitted by these ticks. Consumers of unpasteurised milk and dairy products purchased from local farms located in TBE endemic areas are the most vulnerable to alimentary TBEV infections. Familial infections with these viruses are frequently recorded, mainly in children. Food-transmitted TBE can be monophasic or biphasic, and some of its neurological and psychiatric symptoms may persist in patients for a long time. Alimentary TBEV infections can be effectively prevented by consumption of pasteurised milk and the use of TBEV vaccines. It is recommended that milk and dairy products should be checked for the presence of TBE viruses prior to distribution. Protection of dairy animals against tick attacks and education of humans regarding the epidemiology and prophylaxis of TBE are equally important.

1. Introduction

Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is one of the most important human tick-borne viral pathogens in Eurasia. It causes an acute febrile infectious disease, i.e., tick-borne encephalitis (TBE). In the last two decades, the spread of this virus has intensified considerably [1,2,3,4,5], and new foci have appeared in its current occurrence range [6,7,8,9].
Changes in the distribution of TBEV have contributed to a high increase in the incidence of human TBE in northern, central, north-eastern, and eastern Europe (e.g., [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]). Approximately 10,000–13,000 cases of this disease are registered each year, and the highest TBE incidence (>10/100,000 population) is reported in the Baltic countries, the Czech Republic, Russia, and Slovenia [8,17,20].
The majority of human TBEV infections are associated with ticks feeding on the host skin, but milk-borne transmission have also long been reported (e.g., [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]). Additionally, there have been sporadic cases of TBEV infection of patients undergoing transplantation of solid organs (kidney or liver) [34] and laboratory workers infected through the respiratory tract or oropharyngeal epithelial cells [35].
According to estimates, approximately 1% of all human TBEV infections are acquired through consumption of infected unpasteurised milk or dairy products from infected livestock [36,37]. It seems, however, that infections with this virus via this route may be more frequent. As in the case of virus transmission with tick saliva, some food-borne TBEV infections are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic; hence, they may be undiagnosed and not included in statistics [38]. In as many as 30–50% of all recorded cases of human TBE in Germany, the patients did not remember the tick bite incident before the development of the disease, which suggests that some of the cases may have been caused by food-borne TBEV transmission [39].
Food-borne TBE can be diagnosed in humans, even in regions where the disease has not been previously reported. This may be the case of travellers who become infected with the virus present in milk or dairy products in a TBE endemic area before returning to their country [40].
The highest number of food-borne TBE infections is noted in Slovakia, where as many as 17% of all recorded human TBE cases are associated with the consumption of contaminated unpasteurised milk [41]. TBE outbreaks associated with the consumption of dairy products occur mainly in endemic areas of this disease. Unpasteurised milk is considered by some groups of consumers to have a higher nutritional value than pasteurised milk. As shown during a food-borne TBE epidemic in the Czech Republic, the major argument for drinking unpasteurised milk raised by consumers was the wish to provide a healthy diet for their family members [36]. In addition to the advocates of consumption of unpasteurised milk, producers as well as farm workers and their families are consumers of this type of milk [42]. A large group of consumers of unpasteurised dairy products are those who prefer cheese and other dairy products made from unpasteurised milk. Raw milk vending machines are popular in some regions where residents and tourists can buy local unprocessed dairy products [43].
The increase in global milk consumption may contribute to the spread of alimentary TBE virus infection [44,45]. For many people, especially children and the elderly, milk is the main source of many valuable nutrients, i.e., proteins, fats, carbohydrates, amino acids, minerals, vitamins (e.g., vitamin D), and somatic cells [46]. Milk also contains bioactive substances such as lactoferrin, i.e., an antimicrobial and antiviral protein [47,48], which can block mosquito-borne flavivirus receptor binding [49].
As many as 24 of the 30 countries with the highest consumption of milk and dairy products per capita are European countries [50]. They are represented by the Baltic countries (Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Lithuania, Estonia) as well as central (Switzerland, Austria, Germany) and south-eastern (Slovenia, Croatia, Greece) European countries, where an increase in the TBE incidence is reported.
Due to the possibility of human TBEV infection through the consumption of unpasteurised milk and dairy products, the present study focuses on the determinants of the development of tick-borne encephalitis of nutritional origin in humans, the epidemiology and symptoms of this disease, and methods for the prevention of food-borne transmission of this virus.

2. Circulation of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Viruses in Nature

TBEV is a small (diameter from 40 to 60 nm) single-stranded RNA virus [51,52] from the genus Flavivirus, representing the family Flaviviridae. Its virion consists of a nucleocapsid surrounded by a membrane composed of host-derived lipids in which the viral envelope and membrane proteins are embedded [53]. Protein E, i.e., the major antigen inducing the production of virus-neutralising antibodies, can be inactivated by pasteurisation [54].
Several TBEV subtypes occur in various geographic regions of Europe and Asia, mainly the European (TBEV-Eu), Siberian (TBEV-Sib), and Far Eastern (TBEV-FE) subtypes [55,56,57], and there are two TBEV variants, which are probably new subtypes, i.e., Baikalian (TBEV-Bkl) and Himalayan (TBEV-Him) [57,58,59,60,61].The European subtype causes a milder form of the disease, with a mortality rate of 0.5%-2% [17]. Infections caused by the TBEV-Sib and TBEV-FE subtypes are characterised by severe symptoms, and their mortality rates range between 5 and 20% [62].
Various abiotic (e.g., microclimatic conditions) and biotic factors (e.g., the presence of ticks—vectors, hosts of various tick developmental stages, and zoonotic reservoirs of the pathogen) have an impact on TBEV circulation in nature [10,16,63,64]. The main vectors of the virus are wide host-spectrum ticks such as Ixodes ricinus [65,66] and Dermacentor reticulatus [67,68] in various regions of eastern, central, western, northern, and southern Europe and Ixodes persulcatus in the north-eastern part of the continent [55,56,69,70]. TBEVs can probably also be transmitted by other species of ticks, e.g., Dermacentor marginatus [67,71] and Haemaphysalis concinna [72].
In the last few decades, climate and environmental changes have contributed to the considerable expansion of the occurrence range of ticks with great epidemiological importance [1,2,16,73,74,75] and an increase in their population size [76,77,78] in Eurasia. The duration of the activity of ticks with high vector competence, e.g., Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus, which can attack hosts in central Europe, even in the winter months when the temperatures exceed 0 °C and there is no residual snow layer [79,80,81]. Changes in tick phenology increase the risk of tick attacks on hosts, e.g., dairy animals grazing on pastures during the tick activity period.
The host may be infected with flaviviruses by ticks shortly after the attachment to the skin and onset of blood ingestion. Experimental studies have shown that the nymphs of Ixodes scapularis deer ticks can efficiently transmit Powassan flavivirus to naive mice 15 min after their hypostome is attached in the host skin [82].

3. Spread of Viruses in Dairy Animals, Milk, and Dairy Products

The infection of sheep, goats, and cattle with the TBE virus is usually asymptomatic, but the blood serum of these animals contains TBEV-specific antibodies [11,83,84,85,86]. Nevertheless, there are literature reports on symptomatic (and fatal) cases of livestock infection caused by this virus [87]. In goats and sheep, which are considered sentinel hosts of viruses, antibodies persisted even after 28 months, although there were no disease symptoms [88]. The seroprevalence of anti-TBEV antibodies in dairy animals varies across regions. For example, TBEV-specific antibodies were detected in 4.3% of the blood sera of 4114 goats examined in the Canton of Valais, Switzerland [89] and in 14.6% of 662 serum samples collected from goats from 37 flocks in a non-endemic region in the Canton of Ticino [88].
In north-western Romania, TBEV was identified with the use of the virus neutralisation test (VNT) in 15.02% of sheep in 80% of the 50 examined localities in five counties. In this area, the seroprevalence of TBEV in sheep ranged from 2% in Mureș County to 27.73% in Bihor County [90]. In total, 706 goat sera from 69 farms were screened for TBEV-specific antibodies, resulting in the detection of five positive farms in northeast Italy [4]. Substantial differences in seroprevalence, which ranged between 0% and 43%, were noted in 3590 sheep and 3793 goats examined in 2003 and 2006–2009 in various districts of Germany, i.e., Baden-Wuerttemberg, Bavaria, and Thuringia [91]. In Norway, specific antibodies to TBEV were detected in cows on only one (in Arendal) of five examined farms, but their prevalence was as high as 88.2% [92].
As confirmed by some studies, the seroprevalence in domestic animals correlates with the TBE incidence in humans [4,11,83,84].
During the viraemic phase of the infection, TBEV is secreted with the milk of dairy animals. The TBEV transmission into milk is probably supported by the immunosuppression of the animals caused by infection with another tick-borne pathogen, i.e., Anaplasma phagocytophilum [93]. An increase in the TBEV antibody response after TBEV and A. phagocytophilum co-infection in sheep was reported by Paulsen et al. [94].
As demonstrated in experimental studies, TBEV can be excreted in goat, sheep, and cow milk for approximately 3–7 days, starting from the second and third days after infection [95,96,97,98]. In other studies, TBEV was detected repeatedly in the milk of infected goats for 5–25 days after infection of these animals, and its virulence persisted in such dairy products as yogurt, cheese, and butter [56]. The TBEV virulence in the milk of infected cows, goats, and sheep persists for 8 to 19 days after infection [85,99].
TBEV RNA was identified in unpasteurised milk from 5.4% of cows tested on farms located in three municipalities of Mandal, Skedsmo, and Brønnøy (Norway) [92]. In the tick-borne encephalitis risk area in Lublin Province (eastern Poland), 119 unpasteurised milk samples were collected from 63 cows, 29 goats, and 27 sheep reared on eight farms. The highest TBEV prevalence was detected in the sheep (22.2%) and goat (20.7 %) milk, whereas the cow milk was characterised by a twofold lower prevalence (11.1%) [100]. In turn, in Baden-Württemberg (Germany), 22 cheese samples from goat milk from 18 different batches were tested, and five samples (21.7%) from five different batches of cheese (cream cheese, soft cheese, and ripened cheese) were RT-qPCR-positive for the TBEV-genome [39].
TBEV infections in farmed animals and, consequently, their milk are seasonal, which is related to the vector activity rhythms. In eastern and central Europe, numerous alimentary TBE outbreaks were recorded from May to July [33,101], i.e., during the spring peak activity of I. ricinus, I. persulcatus, and D. reticulatus ticks attacking animals grazing in pastures. In some areas, such as Slovakia, TBE outbreaks after consumption of cow, goat, and sheep milk/cheese were reported in October and November [101], i.e., during the autumn peak activity of adult D. reticulatus parasitizing on dairy animals in Central Europe.
TBEV antibody analysis of bulk tank milk samples collected on 554 dairy farms in Sweden revealed a higher incidence of TBEV antibodies in autumn (November) (4.8%) than in spring (May) (3.0%), which is associated with the increased activity of ticks in summer in this part of the continent, accompanied by an increase in the incidence of cow infection with viruses [102].

4. Alimentary Virus Transmission and Symptoms of Food-Borne TBEV Infections

TBEV infection in humans can occur through the consumption of unpasteurised milk from infected goats [33,36,39,98,100,101,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111], sheep [26,100,101,112], and cows [29,92,100,102,113] (Table 1).
The mechanism of TBEV transmission in food has not been fully elucidated. The maintenance of the virulence of the virus may be influenced by the mode of digestion of dairy products in the gastrointestinal system. Milk remains in the stomach, where the pH is low, for a relatively short time, and its first portions leave the stomach and reach the duodenum within a few minutes. After 1.5 to 2 h, there is no longer milk in the stomach [70]. As confirmed by the research conducted by Pogodin [114], TBEVs maintain their infectivity in normal gastric juice (pH 1.49–1.80) for up to 2 h. This may explain why these viruses contained in ingested milk maintain their virulence until they penetrate the duodenum, where they probably penetrate the M cells of Peyer’s patches and then reach the lymphatic tissue. Thus, they may be released into the circulatory system and transferred to various organs, including the brain, with blood [85,115]. TBE outbreaks affect consumers of milk and dairy products originating from the same sources, e.g., those purchased directly from local producers [31,39,101,109,110,113] or in venues selling regional products, e.g., marketplaces and restaurants [33,101]. TBEV infections often affect members of the same family (e.g., [29,30,33,36,101,105,111,116]). In the Czech Republic, 33 TBE cases (51.6%) were detected as family outbreaks after consumption of cheese or milk purchased from animal breeders. In familial infections, children more often suffer from this disease, as they are probably the main consumers of contaminated milk [36].
One group at high risk of food-borne infection are shepherds grazing goats and/or sheep in the mountains and consuming unpasteurised milk and dairy products. Transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) through unpasteurised goat milk in shepherds was described, e.g., in an alpine pasture located at 1500 m above sea level in western Austria [106].
Food-borne TBE, formerly referred to as biphasic milk fever, may be asymptomatic or may induce symptoms appearing once or twice with a remission period between their occurrences [106,110,117,118]. The monophasic TBE form was diagnosed in approximately 50% of 274 patients hospitalised after the consumption of unpasteurised contaminated milk from a local dairy during a milk-borne TBE outbreak in Rožňava (Slovakia) in 1951, during which over 600 subjects were infected by the virus [117].
The TBE incubation period in milk-borne infection may range from 2 days to 4 weeks (e.g., [108,111]). For example, during the epidemic in Croatia, Ilic et al. [111] found that TBE symptoms in most patients developed two weeks after consuming raw (unpasteurised) goat milk. In turn, Brockmann et al. [39] reported a shorter incubation period of 3 to 7 days in patients infected with the virus from unpasteurised goat milk and cheese in Baden-Württemberg. Dorko et al. [101] reported an average incubation period of 13.8 days (4 days–4 weeks) after consumption of goat, sheep, and cow milk/cheese.
The course of the disease and symptoms of alimentary infection with the virus may vary between patients [33,39,106,108,118]. In the first phase, nonspecific flu-like symptoms persist for ca. 3–7 days. They most often include an increase in body temperature to approx. 38.5 °C–40.0 °C, headache, limb weakness, nausea, and vomiting. After a ca. 8-day period of remission, there may be a second phase with high temperature, headaches, nausea, and vomiting as well as signs of meningeal irritation and/or encephalitis. In the mild course of the second phase, symptoms resolve after 3–4 days. In severe cases, they usually persist for 12–21 days, and sometimes even for several months [39,108]. Although the overall health of the patient may improve, some symptoms such as asthenia and neurological and psychiatric disorders may appear one year after food-borne TBEV infection [39].
Less common symptoms of alimentary TBEV infection were found to include disturbances in vision, blurred vision or diplopia, neurasthenia, vertigo, fatigue syndrome, lower limb paraparesis, cough, tetany, paraesthesia, cerebral syndrome, and insomnia [101,118]. Dorko et al. [101] reported the death of a 47-year-old man diagnosed with TBE, who may have contracted the virus via consumption of unpasteurised goat milk. However, because the patient also reported a tick bite incident in the history, it was not possible to determine the source of the TBEV infection clearly.
A comparison of the frequency of food-borne TBE cases in different patient groups has shown that the risk of infection in children aged 5 to 9 years is 2.5 times greater than that in adults aged from 35–44 to 75+ years [36]. No analyses have been performed to compare the disease symptoms in children and adults in alimentary TBEV infection. A relationship between the age of patients and the TBE symptoms and course was confirmed in cases of tick bite-transmitted TBEV infections. TBE was usually milder in children than in adults [37].

5. Methods for Prevention of Alimentary TBEV Infection and Determinants of Virus Survival in Food

Food-borne TBEV transmission can be effectively reduced by the consumption of pasteurised goat, sheep, and cow milk.
The International Dairy Foods Association [119] recommends that milk should be pasteurised by heating to 72 °C for 15 s and then immediately cooled to refrigeration temperatures (4 °C). Rónai et al. [120] found that both fast (72 °C, 15 s) and soft (63 °C, 30 min) pasteurisation destroyed viable TBE virus particles. As shown by these authors, in addition to pasteurisation, the addition of salt during cheese production can protect the consumer from TBEV infection.
While proper milk pasteurisation fully protects consumers against TBEV infection, temperature does not completely inactivate the virus in the milk used for cheese production [121]. Therefore, procedures for the reduction of the possibility of contamination of milk intended for direct consumption and all dairy products, including cheese, should be implemented in TBE endemic areas.
In unpasteurised milk from sheep and goats stored at a temperature of 4 °C, the TBE virus infectivity is preserved for at least 3 days [5]. Similar results were obtained by Offerdahl et al. [121] in experimental studies on the thermal stability of flaviviruses (BSL-2 TBFV) in unpasteurised goat milk. At room temperature and 37 °C, complete inhibition of TBE virus replication in colostrum and milk was found after 24 h and 48 h, respectively [5].
The risk of alimentary TBEV infections depends on the amount of viruses in milk and dairy products. In unpasteurised goat milk and unsalted cheese with a small amount of TBEV, virulent particles were detected for 5–10 days. In the case of larger amounts, virulent particles were present for up to 20–25 days in milk and for 10–15 days in unsalted cheese samples, regardless of the seasoning used [120].
Vaccination against TBEV is an effective prophylaxis of the development of TBE caused by tick- and food-borne infections [38,99,108,122,123,124,125]. The market provides different TBE vaccines, e.g., FSME-IMMUN®, Encepur®, EnceVir, and IPVE (also called TBE vaccine Moscow) vaccines containing inactivated strains of viruses, which protect against the European, Siberian, and Far-Eastern subtypes of TBEV [123,126,127]. According to a standard schedule, the vaccines are administered intramuscularly in three doses, usually with an interval of 1–3 and 5–12 months between the first and second and the second and third dose, respectively [128].
Because the knowledge of tick-borne diseases declared by the inhabitants of various regions is still unsatisfactory, education in the field of TBE epidemiology and prophylaxis in various groups of people, especially milk consumers, farmers, and dairy cattle breeders, may contribute to the reduction of the incidence of alimentary TBEV infections [129,130,131].
Reduction of the number of ticks, i.e., TBEV vectors, in TBE occurrence areas with the use of various chemical and biological methods (e.g., [132]) may reduce the exposure of dairy animals to tick infestations.

6. Conclusions

The expansion of the tick occurrence range and the increase in the tick population size have resulted in an increased risk of exposure of tick hosts, i.e., goats, sheep, and cows, to infection with TBE viruses, which are introduced with the saliva of ticks during blood ingestion. Consumption of unpasteurised milk and dairy products derived from infected dairy animals poses a risk of food-borne transmission of the virus to humans. The course of TBE disease, with possible long-term neurological symptoms, suggests the need to undertake various measures to reduce human exposure to its causal agent.
In order to reduce the incidence of alimentary TBEV infections, the consumption of pasteurised milk and its products should be recommended. Special attention should be paid to the methods for manufacturing dairy products (cheese, yoghurt) in local factories in TBE endemic areas, which should ensure full protection against TBEV contamination in goat, sheep, and cow milk.
Before distribution by local producers, unpasteurised dairy products should be analysed for the presence of viruses, and/or TBEV infected dairy animals providing milk for human consumption should be excluded. It is recommended that the prophylaxis of TBEV transmitted via food and by ticks should be based on the use of vaccines against TBEV available on the market. It is also indispensable to develop a strategy for controlling ticks (TBEV vectors) and for the protection of their potential hosts (dairy animals) against attacks by these arthropods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. and A.M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B., A.M.B., W.B. and J.W.-M.; writing—review and editing, A.B. and J.W.-M. supervision, A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Golovljova, I.; Vene, S.; Sjölander, K.B.; Vasilenko, V.; Plyusnin, A.; Lundkvist, V. Characterization of tick-borne encephalitis virus from Estonia. J. Med. Virol. 2004, 74, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jääskeläinen, A.E.; Tikkakoski, T.; Uzcátegui, N.Y.; Alekseev, A.N.; Vaheri, A.; Vapalahti, O. Siberian subtype tickborne encephalitis virus, Finland. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 1568–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tonteri, E.; Kurkela, S.; Timonen, S.; Manni, T.; Vuorinen, T.; Kuusi, M.; Vapalahti, O. Surveillance of endemic foci of tick-borne encephalitis in Finland 1995–2013: Evidence of emergence of new foci. Eurosurveillance 2015, 20, 30020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Alfano, N.; Tagliapietra, V.; Rosso, F.; Ziegler, U.; Arnoldi, D.; Rizzoli, A. Tick-borne encephalitis foci in northeast Italy revealed by combined virus detection in ticks, serosurvey on goats and human cases. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2020, 9, 474–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wallenhammar, A.; Lindqvist, R.; Asghar, N.; Gunaltay, S.; Fredlund, H.; Davidsson, Å.; Andersson, S.; Överby, A.K.; Johansson, M. Revealing new tick-borne encephalitis virus foci by screening antibodies in sheep milk. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Stefanoff, P.; Siennicka, J.; Kaba, J.; Nowicki, M.; Ferenczi, E.; Gut, W. Identification of new endemic tick-borne encephalitis foci in Poland—A pilot seroprevalence study in selected regions. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 298, S102–S107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Süss, J. Tick-borne encephalitis 2010: Epidemiology, risk areas, and virus strains in Europe and Asia—An overview. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2011, 2, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Beauté, J.; Spiteri, G.; Warns-Petit, E.; Zeller, H. Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe, 2012 to 2016. Eurosurveillance 2018, 23, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Riccardi, N.; Antonello, R.M.; Luzzati, R.; Zajkowska, J.; Di Bella, S.; Giacobbe, D.R. Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe: A brief update on epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2019, 62, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Danielová, V.; Kliegrová, S.; Daniel, M.; Benes, C. Influence of climate warming on tickborne encephalitis expansion to higher altitudes over the last decade (1997–2006) in the Highland Region (Czech Republic). Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 2008, 16, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stjernberg, L.; Holmkvist, K.; Berglund, J. A newly detected tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) focus in south-east Sweden: A follow-up study of TBE virus (TBEV) seroprevalence. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 40, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lukan, M.; Bullova, E.; Petko, B. Climate warming and tick-borne encephalitis, Slovakia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 524–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Czupryna, P.; Moniuszko, A.; Pancewicz, S.A.; Grygorczuk, S.; Kondrusik, M.; Zajkowska, J. Tick-borne encephalitis in Poland in years 1993–2008—Epidemiology and clinical presentation. A retrospective study of 687 patients. Eur. J. Neurol. 2011, 18, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lundkvist, A.; Wallensten, A.; Vene, S.; Hjertqvist, M. Tick-borne encephalitis increasing in Sweden, 2011. Eurosurveillance 2011, 16, 19981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Dobler, G.; Gniel, D.; Petermann, R.; Pfeffer, M. Epidemiology and distribution of tick-borne encephalitis. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 2012, 162, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jaenson, T.G.; Hjertqvist, M.; Bergström, T.; Lundkvist, A. Why is tick-borne encephalitis increasing? A review of the key factors causing the increasing incidence of human TBE in Sweden. Parasites Vectors 2012, 5, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. ECDC. Annual Epidemiological Report 2014—Emerging and Vector-Borne Diseases; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Stockholm, Sweden, 2014.
  18. Weststrate, A.C.; Knapen, D.; Laverman, G.D.; Schot, B.; Prick, J.J.; Spit, S.A.; Reimerink, J.; Rockx, B.; Geeraedts, F. Increasing evidence of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus transmission, The Netherlands, June 2016. Eurosurveillance 2017, 22, 30482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Radzišauskiene, D.; Zagminas, K.; Ašokliene, L.; Jasionisc, A.; Mameniškiene, R.; Ambrozaitisa, A.; Jancoriené, L.; Jatužis, D.; Petraityté, I.; Mockiene, E. Epidemiological patterns of tick-borne encephalitis in Lithuania and clinical features in adults in the light of the high incidence in recent years: A retrospective study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018, 25, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lindquist, L.; Vapalahti, O. Tick-borne encephalitis. Lancet 2008, 371, 1861–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Levkovich, E.N.; Pogodina, V.V. Infection through the alimentary tract with tick-borne encephalitis. Vopr. Virusol. 1958, 3, 145–150. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  22. Drozdov, S.G. Experimental studies on a possibility of isolation of four types of tick-borne encephalitis virus from goat milk. Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol. 1959, 30, 114–118. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Vereta, L.A.; Kanter, V.M. Studies on tick-borne encephalitis of nutritional origin in the Khabarovsk region. Vopr. Virusol. 1960, 5, 199–204. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Blaškovič, D.; Pucekova, G.; Kubinyi, L.; Stupalova, S.; Oravcova, V. An epidemiological study of tick-borne encephalitis in the Tribec region: 1953–1963. Bull. World Health Organ. 1967, 36, S89–S94. [Google Scholar]
  25. Popov, V.F. Infection of the population by goat milk in a focus of tick-borne encephalitis. Med. Parazitol. 1967, 36, 288–289. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  26. Grešíková, M.; Sekeyová, M.; Stúpalová, S.; Necas, S. Sheep milk-borne epidemic of tick-borne encephalitis in Slovakia. Intervirology 1975, 5, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jeżyna, C.; Weglińska, T.; Nawrocka, E.; Falecka, W.; Wielizcko-Gebska, L.; Rodkiewicz, T.; Piesiak, Z.; Ciesielski, T. Milk-borne outbreak of tick-borne encephalitis in Olsztyn Province. Przegląd Epidemiologiczny 1976, 30, 479–489. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Sixl, W.; Stünzner, D.; Withalm, H.; Köck, M. Rare transmission mode of FSME (tick-borne encephalitis) by goat’s milk. Geogr. Med. 1989, 2, S11–S14. [Google Scholar]
  29. Vereta, L.A.; Skorobrekha, V.Z.; Nikolaeva, S.P.; Aleksandrov, V.I.; Tolstonogova, V.I.; Zakharycheva, T.A.; Red’ko, A.P.; Lev, M.I.; Savel’eva, N.A. The transmission of the tick-borne encephalitis virus via cow’s milk. Med. Parazitol. 1991, 3, 54–56. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  30. Kohl, I.; Kozuch, O.; Elecková, E.; Labuda, M.; Zaludko, J. Family outbreak of alimentary tick-borne encephalitis in Slovakia associated with a natural focus of infection. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 1996, 12, 373–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Matuszczyk, I.; Tarnowska, H.; Zabicka, J.; Gut, W. The outbreak of an epidemic of tick-borne encephalitis in Kielc province induced by milk ingestion. Przegląd Epidemiologiczny 1997, 51, 381–388. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  32. Rieger, M.A.; Nübling, M.; Kaiser, R.; Tiller, F.W.; Hofmann, F. Tick-borne encephalitis transmitted by raw milk—What is the significance of this route of infection? Studies in the epidemic region of South-West Germany. Gesundheitswesen 1998, 60, 348–356. (In German) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Kerbo, N.; Donchenko, I.; Kutsar, K.; Vasilenko, V. Tickborne encephalitis outbreak in Estonia linked to raw goat milk, May–June 2005. Eurosurveillance 2005, 10, 2730. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Lipowski, D.; Popiel, M.; Perlejewski, K.; Nakamura, S.; Bukowska-Ośko, I.; Rzadkiewicz, E.; Dzieciątkowski, T.; Milecka, A.; Wenski, W.; Ciszek, M.; et al. A cluster of fatal tick-borne encephalitis virus infection in organ transplant setting. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Avsic-Zupanc, T.; Poljak, M.; Maticic, M.; Radsel-Medvescek, A.; LeDuc, J.W.; Stiasny, K.; Kunz, C.; Heinz, F.X. Laboratory acquired tick-borne meningoencephalitis: Characterisation of virus strains. Clin. Diagn. Virol. 1995, 4, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kríz, B.; Benes, C.; Daniel, M. Alimentary transmission of tick-borne encephalitis in the Czech Republic (1997–2008). Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2009, 58, 98–103. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bogovic, P.; Strle, F. Tick-borne encephalitis: A review of epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management. World J. Clin. Cases. 2015, 3, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Amicizia, D.; Domnich, A.; Panatto, D.; Lai, P.L.; Cristina, M.L.; Avio, U.; Gasparini, R. Epidemiology of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in Europe and its prevention by available vaccines. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2013, 9, 1163–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Brockmann, S.O.; Oehme, R.; Buckenmaier, T.; Beer, M.; Jeffery-Smith, A.; Spannenkrebs, M.; Haag-Milz, S.; Wagner-Wiening, C.; Schlegel, C.; Fritz, J.; et al. A cluster of two human cases of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) transmitted by unpasteurised goat milk and cheese in Germany, May 2016. Eurosurveillance 2018, 23, e17-00336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Camprubí, D.; Moreno García, E.; Almuedo Riera, A.; Martínez Yoldi, M.J.; Navarro, A.; Martínez Hernández, E.; Muñoz, J.; Ambrosioni, J. First imported case of tick-borne encephalitis in Spain—Was it alimentary? Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 37, 101701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kerlik, J.; Avdičová, M.; Štefkovičová, M.; Tarkovská, V.; Pántiková Valachová, M.; Molčányi, T.; Mezencev, R. Slovakia reports highest occurrence of alimentary tick-borne encephalitis in Europe: Analysis of tick-borne encephalitis outbreaks in Slovakia during 2007–2016. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 26, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jayarao, B.M.; Donaldson, S.C.; Straley, B.A.; Sawant, A.A.; Hegde, N.V.; Brown, J.L. A survey of foodborne pathogens in bulk tank milk and raw milk consumption among farm families in Pennsylvania. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 2451–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Giacometti, F.; Serraino, A.; Finazzi, G.; Daminelli, P.; Losio, M.N.; Tamba, M.; Garigliani, A.; Mattioli, R.; Riu, R.; Zanoni, R.G. Field handling conditions of raw milk sold in vending machines: Experimental evaluation of the behaviour of Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium, and Campylobacter jejuni. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 11, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Singh, G.M.; Micha, R.; Khatibzadeh, S.; Shi, P.; Lim, S.; Andrews, K.G.; Engell, R.E.; Ezzati, M.; Mozaffarian, D. Global, regional, and national consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit juices, and milk: A systematic assessment of beverage intake in 187 countries. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124845. [Google Scholar]
  45. FAO. World Food and Agriculture—Statistical Yearbook 2020; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Quigley, L.; O’Sullivan, O.; Stanton, C.; Beresford, T.P.; Ross, R.P.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Cotter, P.D. The complex microbiota of raw milk. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 664–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Van der Strate, B.; Beljaars, L.; Molema, G.; Harmesen, M.; Meijer, D. Antiviral activities of lactoferrin. Antivir. Res. 2001, 52, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Berlutti, F.; Pantanella, F.; Natalizi, T.; Frioni, A.; Paesano, R.; Polimeni, A.; Valenti, P. Antiviral properties of lactoferrin—A natural immunity molecule. Molecules 2011, 16, 6992–7018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chien, Y.J.; Chen, W.J.; Hsu, W.L.; Chiou, S.S. Bovine lactoferrin inhibits Japanese encephalitis virus by binding to heparan sulfate and receptor for low density lipoprotein. Virology 2008, 379, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. List of Countries by Milk Consumption Per Capita. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_milk_consumption_per_capita (accessed on 23 June 2021).
  51. Lindenbach, B.D.; Rice, C.M. Flaviviridae: The viruses and their replication. In Fields Virology, 4th ed.; Fields, B.N., Knipe, D.M., Howley, P.M., Griffin, D.E., Eds.; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2001; pp. 991–1041. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pulkkinen, L.I.A.; Butcher, S.J.; Anastasina, M. Tick-borne encephalitis virus: A structural view. Viruses 2018, 10, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Füzik, T.; Formanová, P.; Růžek, D.; Yoshii, K.; Niedrig, M.; Plevka, P. Structure of tick-borne encephalitis virus and its neutralization by a monoclonal antibody. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kaiser, R. Tick-borne encephalitis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2008, 22, 561–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lundkvist, K.; Vene, S.; Golovljova, I.; Mavtchoutko, V.; Forsgren, M.; Kalnina, V.; Plyusnin, A. Characterization of tick-borne encephalitis virus from Latvia: Evidence for co-circulation of three distinct subtypes. J. Med. Virol. 2001, 65, 730–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gritsun, T.S.; Frolova, T.V.; Zhankov, A.I.; Armesto, M.; Turner, S.L.; Frolova, M.P.; Pogodina, V.V.; Lashkevich, V.A.; Gould, E.A. Characterization of a Siberian virus isolated from a patient with progressive chronic tick-borne encephalitis. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kovalev, S.Y.; Mukhacheva, T.A. Tick-borne encephalitis virus subtypes emerged through rapid vector switches rather than gradual evolution. Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4, 4307–4316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ecker, M.; Allison, S.L.; Meixner, T.; Heinz, F.X. Sequence analysis and genetic classification of tick-borne encephalitis viruses from Europe and Asia. J. Gen. Virol. 1999, 80, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Demina, T.V.; Dzhioev, Y.P.; Verkhozina, M.M.; Kozlova, I.V.; Tkachev, S.E.; Plyusnin, A.; Doroshchenko, E.K.; Lisak, O.V.; Zlobin, I. Genotyping and characterization of the geographical distribution of tick-borne encephalitis virus variants with a set of molecular probes. J. Med. Virol. 2010, 82, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dai, X.; Shang, G.; Lu, S.; Yang, J.; Xu, J. A new subtype of eastern tick-borne encephalitis virus discovered in Qinghai—Tibet Plateau, China. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kozlova, I.V.; Demina, T.V.; Tkachev, S.E.; Doroshchenko, E.K.; Lisak, O.V.; Verkhozina, M.M.; Karan, L.S.; Dzhioev, Y.P.; Paramonov, A.I.; Suntsova, O.V.; et al. Characteristics of the Baikal subtype of tick-borne encephalitis virus circulating in Eastern Siberia. Acta Biomedica Scientifica 2018, 3, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Mansfield, K.L.; Johnson, N.; Phipps, L.P.; Stephenson, J.R.; Fooks, A.R.; Solomon, T. Tick-borne encephalitis virus—A review of an emerging zoonosis. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 1781–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Daniel, M.; Danielová, V.; Fialová, A.; Malý, M.; Kříž, B.; Nuttall, P.A. Increased relative risk of tick-borne encephalitis in warmer weather. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Michelitsch, A.; Wernike, K.; Klaus, C.; Dobler, G.; Beer, M. Exploring the reservoir hosts of tick-borne encephalitis Virus. Viruses 2019, 11, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Casati, S.; Gern, L.; Piffaretti, J.-C. Diversity of the population of tick-borne encephalitis virus infecting Ixodes ricinus ticks in an endemic area of central Switzerland. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 2235–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Süss, J.; Klaus, C.; Diller, R.; Schrader, C.; Wohanka, N.; Abel, U. TBE incidence versus virus prevalence of the TBE virus in Ixodes ricinus removed from humans. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 296, S63–S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kozuch, O.; Nosek, J. Transmission of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus by Dermacentor marginatus and D. reticulatus ticks. Acta Virologica 1971, 15, 334. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Chitimia-Dobler, L.; Lemhöfer, G.; Król, N.; Bestehorn, M.; Dobler, G.; Pfeffer, M. Repeated isolation of tick-borne encephalitis virus from adult Dermacentor reticulatus ticks in an endemic area in Germany. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Dzhivanyan, T.I.; Lashkevich, V.A.; Bannova, G.G.; Sarmanova, E.S.; Chuprinskaya, M.V.; Vesenjak-Hirjan, J.; Vince, V. On the possible association of the DS marker of tick-borne encephalitis virus strains with species of tick vectors. Archiv Gesamte Virusforschung 1974, 45, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gritsun, T.S.; Lashkevich, V.A.; Gould, E.A. Tick-borne encephalitis. Antivir. Res. 2003, 57, 129–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nosek, J.; Kozuch, O. Replication of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus in ticks Dermacentor marginatus. Angew. Parasitol. 1985, 26, 97–101. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kozuch, O.; Nosek, J. Experimental transmission of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus by Haemaphysalis concinna ticks. Acta Virologica 1980, 24, 377. [Google Scholar]
  73. Estrada-Peña, A.; Farkas, R.; Jaenson, T.G.T.; Koenen, F.; Madder, M.; Pascucci, I.; Salman, M.; Tarrés-Call, J.; Jongejan, F. Association of environmental traits with the geographic ranges of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) of medical and veterinary importance in the western Palearctic. A digital data set. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2013, 59, 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Medlock, J.M.; Hansford, K.M.; Bormane, A.; Derdakova, M.; Estrada-Peña, A.; George, J.C.; Golovljova, I.; Jaenson, T.G.; Jensen, J.K.; Jensen, P.M.; et al. Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe. Parasites Vectors 2013, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Földvári, G.; Široký, P.; Szekeres, S.; Majoros, G.; Sprong, H. Dermacentor reticulatus: A vector on the rise. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Buczek, A.; Bartosik, K.; Wiśniowski, Ł.; Tomasiewicz, K. Changes in population abundance of adult Dermacentor reticulatus (Acari: Amblyommidae) in long-term investigations in eastern Poland. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2013, 20, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Osipova, T.; Grigoryeva, L.; Samoylova, E.; Shapar, A.; Bychkova, E. The influence of meteorological factors on the activity of adult taiga ticks (Ixodes persulcatus Sch., Ixodinae) in St. Petersburg and its environs. Entomol. Rev. 2017, 97, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hauser, G.; Rais, O.; Moran Cadenas, F.; Gonseth, Y.; Bouzelboudjen, M.; Gern, L. Influence of climatic factors on Ixodes ricinus nymph abundance and phenology over a long-term monthly observation in Switzerland (2000–2014). Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dautel, H.; Dippel, C.; Kämmer, D.; Werkhausen, A.; Kahl, O. Winter activity of Ixodes ricinus in a Berlin Forest. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 298, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Buczek, A.; Bartosik, K.; Zając, Z. Changes in the activity of adult stages of Dermacentor reticulatus (Ixodida: Amblyommidae) induced by weather factors in eastern Poland. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kiewra, D.; Czułowska, A.; Lonc, E. Winter activity of Dermacentor reticulatus (Fabricius, 1794) in the newly emerging population of Lower Silesia, south-west Poland. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 1124–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ebel, G.D.; Kramer, L.D. Short report: Duration of tick attachment required for transmission of Powassan virus by deer ticks. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2004, 71, 268–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Csángó, P.A.; Blakstad, E.; Kirtz, G.C.; Pederson, J.E.; Czettel, B. Tick-borne encephalitis in Southern Norway. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 533–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Juceviciene, A.; Zygutiene, M.; Leinikki, P.; Brummer-Korvenkontio, H.; Salminen, M.; Han, X.; Vapalahti, O. Tick-borne encephalitis virus infections in Lithuanian domestic animals and ticks. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 37, 742–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Balogh, Z.; Egyed, L.; Ferenczi, E.; Bán, E.; Szomor, N.K.; Takács, M.; Berencsi, G. Experimental infection of goats with tick-borne encephalitis virus and the possibilities to prevent virus transmission by raw goat milk. Intervirology 2012, 55, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Frimmel, S.; Lobermann, M.; Feldhusen, F.; Seelmann, M.; Stiasny, K.; Suss, J.; Reisinger, E.C. Detection of tick-borne encephalitis virus antibodies in sera of sheep and goats in Mecklenburg-western Pomerania (north-eastern Germany). Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019, 10, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Böhm, B.; Schade, B.; Bauer, B.; Hoffmann, B.; Hoffmann, D.; Ziegler, U.; Beer, M.; Klaus, C.; Weissenböck, H.; Böttcher, J. Tick-borne encephalitis in a naturally infected sheep. BMC Vet. Res. 2017, 13, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Casati Pagani, S.; Frigerio Malossa, S.; Klaus, C.; Hofmann, D.; Beretta, O.; Bomio-Pacciorini, N.; Lazzaro, M.; Merlani, G.; Ackermann, R.; Beuret, C. First detection of TBE virus in ticks and sero-reactivity in goats in a non-endemic region in the southern part of Switzerland (Canton of Ticino). Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019, 10, 868–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Rieille, N.; Klaus, C.; Hoffmann, D.; Péter, O.; Voordouw, M.J. Goats as sentinel hosts for the detection of tick-borne encephalitis risk areas in the Canton of Valais, Switzerland. BMC Vet. Res. 2017, 13, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Salat, J.; Mihalca, A.D.; Mihaiu, M.; Modry, D.; Ruzek, D. Tick-borne encephalitis in sheep, Romania. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 2065–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Klaus, C.; Beer, M.; Saier, R.; Schau, U.; Moog, U.; Hoffmann, B.; Diller, R.; Süss, J. Goats and sheep as sentinels for tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus—Epidemiological studies in areas endemic and non-endemic for TBE virus in Germany. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012, 3, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Paulsen, K.M.; Stuen, S.; das Neves, C.G.; Suhel, F.; Gurung, D.; Soleng, A.; Stiasny, K.; Vikse, R.; Andreassen, Å.K.; Granquist, E.G. Tick-borne encephalitis virus in cows and unpasteurized cow milk from Norway. Zoonoses Public Health 2019, 66, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zeman, P.; Januska, J.; Orolinova, M.; Stuen, S.; Struhar, V.; Jebavy, L. High seroprevalence of granulocytic ehrlichiosis distinguishes sheep that were the source of an alimentary epidemic of tick-borne encephalitis. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 2004, 116, 614–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Paulsen, K.M.; Granquist, E.G.; Okstad, W.; Vikse, R.; Stiasny, K.; Andreassen, Å.K.; Stuen, S. Experimental infection of lambs with tick-borne encephalitis virus and co-infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0226836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Van Tongeren, H.A.E. Encephalitis in Austria IV. Excretion of virus by milk of the experimentally infected goat. Archiv Gesamte Virusforschung 1955, 6, 158–162. [Google Scholar]
  96. Grešíková, M. Recovery of the tick-borne encephalitis virus from the blood and milk of subcutaneously infected sheep. Acta Virologica 1958, 2, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Grešíková, M. Excretion of the tickborne encephalitis virus in the milk of subcutaneously infected cows. Acta Virologica 1958, 2, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Grešíková, M.; Rehäček, J. Isolation of the tick encephalitis virus from blood ad milk of domestic animals (sheep and cow) after infection by ticks of the family Ixodes ricinus L. Archiv Gesamte Virusforschung 1959, 9, 360–364. (In German) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Süss, J. Epidemiology and ecology of TBE relevant to the production of effective vaccines. Vaccine 2003, 21, S19–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cisak, E.; Wójcik-Fatla, A.; Zając, V.; Sroka, J.; Buczek, A.; Dutkiewicz, J. Prevalence of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) in samples of raw milk taken randomly from cows, goats and sheep in eastern Poland. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2010, 17, 283–286. [Google Scholar]
  101. Dorko, E.; Hockicko, J.; Rimárová, K.; Bušová, A.; Popaďák, P.; Popaďáková, J.; Schréter, I. Milk outbreaks of tick-borne encephalitis in Slovakia, 2012–2016. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 2018, 26, S47–S50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Blomqvist, G.; Näslund, K.; Svensson, L.; Beck, C.; Valarcher, J.F. Mapping geographical areas at risk for tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) by analysing bulk tank milk from Swedish dairy cattle herds for the presence of TBE virus-specific antibodies. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2021, 63, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Grešíková, M. The transmission of the virus of the Czechoslovak tick encephalitis by goat milk. In Zeckenenzephalitis in Europa Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe; Libikova, H., Ed.; Akademieverlag Berlin: Berlin, Germany, 1960; Volume 2, pp. 121–122. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  104. Zindel, W.; Wyler, R. Tick-borne encephalitis in a goat in lower Prätigau. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 1983, 125, 383–386. [Google Scholar]
  105. Zaludko, J.; Vrbová, O.; Hachlincová, R.; Kohl, I.; Hubálek, Z.; Jurincová, Z.; Kozuch, O.; Elecková, E.; Labuda, M. Familial epidemics of tick-borne encephalitis in central Povazie. Bratislavske Lekarske Listy 1994, 95, 523–526. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  106. Holzmann, H.; Aberle, S.W.; Stiasny, K.; Werner, P.; Mischak, A.; Zainer, B.; Netzer, M.; Koppi, S.; Bechter, E.; Heinz, F.X. Tick-borne encephalitis from eating goat cheese in a mountain region of Austria. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 1671–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Balogh, Z.; Ferenczi, E.; Szeles, K.; Stefanoff, P.; Gut, W.; Szomor, K.; Takacs, M.; Berencsi, G. Tick-borne encephalitis outbreak in Hungary due to consumption of raw goat milk. J. Virol. Methods. 2010, 163, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Hudopisk, N.; Korva, M.; Janet, E.; Simetinger, M.; Grgič-Vitek, M.; Gubenšek, J.; Natek, V.; Kraigher, A.; Strle, F.; Avšič-Županc, T. Tick-borne encephalitis associated with consumption of raw goat milk, Slovenia, 2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 806–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Markovinović, L.; Kosanović Ličina, M.L.; Tešić, V.; Vojvodić, D.; Vladušić Lucić, I.; Kniewald, T.; Vukas, T.; Kutleša, M.; Krajinović, L.C. An outbreak of tick-borne encephalitis associated with raw goat milk and cheese consumption, Croatia, 2015. Infection 2016, 44, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Król, M.; Borawski, B.; Nowicka-Ciełuszecka, A.; Tarasiuk, J.; Zajkowska, J.M. Outbreak of alimentary tick-borne encephalitis in Podlaskie voivodeship, Poland. Przegląd Epidemiologiczny 2019, 73, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ilic, M.; Barbic, L.; Bogdanic, M.; Tabain, I.; Savic, V.; Kosanovic Licina, M.L.; Kaic, B.; Jungic, A.; Vucelja, M.; Angelov, V.; et al. Tick-borne encephalitis outbreak following raw goat milk consumption in a new micro-location, Croatia, June 2019. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Van den Brom, R.; de Jong, A.; van Engelen, E.; Heuvelink, A.; Vellema, P. Zoonotic risks of pathogens from sheep and their milk borne transmission. Small Rumin. Res. 2020, 189, 106123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Caini, S.; Szomor, K.; Ferenczi, E.; Székelyné Gáspár, Á.; Csohán, Á.; Krisztalovics, K.; Molnár, Z.; Horváth, J.K. Tick-borne encephalitis transmitted by unpasteurised cow milk in western Hungary, September to October 2011. Eurosurveillance 2012, 17, 20128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Pogodina, V.V. The resistance of tick-borne encephalitis virus to the effects of gastric juice. Vopr. Virusol. 1958, 3, 295–299. [Google Scholar]
  115. Mercer, J.; Helenius, A. Virus entry by macropinocytosis. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2009, 11, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Czimová, M.; Raszka, J.; Januska, J.; Heinz, F.; Odehnal, P.; Fantová, Z.; Hillová, L. Familial incidence of tick-borne encephalitis with alimentary transmission. Ceskoslovenska Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1981, 30, 334–339. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  117. Blaškovič, D. The Epidemic of Encephalitis in Roznava Natural Focus of Infection; Slovak Academy of Sciences: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1954; p. 314. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  118. Růžek, D.; Avšič Županc, T.; Borde, J.; Chrdle, A.; Eyer, L.; Karganova, G.; Kholodilov, I.; Knap, N.; Kozlovskaya, L.; Matveev, A.; et al. Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe and Russia: Review of pathogenesis, clinical features, therapy, and vaccines. Antiviral. Res. 2019, 164, 23–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. International Dairy Foods Association. Pasteurization. Available online: https://www.idfa.org/news-views/media-kits/milk/pasteurization (accessed on 23 June 2021).
  120. Rónai, Z.; Egyed, L. Survival of tick-borne encephalitis virus in goat cheese and milk. Food Environ. Virol. 2020, 12, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Offerdahl, D.K.; Clancy, N.G.; Bloom, M.E. Stability of a tick-borne flavivirus in milk. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2016, 4, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Kollaritsch, H.; Chmelik, V.; Dontsenko, I.; Grzeszczuk, A.; Kondrusik, M.; Usonis, V.; Lakos, A. The current perspective on tick-borne encephalitis awareness and prevention in six Central and Eastern European countries: Report from a meeting of experts convened to discuss TBE in their region. Vaccine 2011, 29, 4556–4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. World Health Organization. Vaccines against tick-borne encephalitis: WHO position paper. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 2011, 86, 241–256. [Google Scholar]
  124. Heinz, F.X.; Stiasny, K.; Holzmann, H.; Grgic-Vitek, M.; Kriz, B.; Essl, A.; Kundi, M. Vaccination and tick-borne Encephalitis, Central Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chitimia-Dobler, L.; Lindau, A.; Oehme, R.; Bestehorn-Willmann, M.; Antwerpen, M.; Drehmann, M.; Hierl, T.; Mackenstedt, U.; Dobler, G. Tick-borne encephalitis vaccination protects from alimentary TBE infection: Results from an alimentary outbreak. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zavadska, D.; Anca, I.; Andre, F.; Bakir, M.; Chlibek, R.; Cizman, M.; Ivaskeviciene, I.; Mangarov, A.; Meszner, Z.; Pokorn, M.; et al. Recommendations for tick-borne encephalitis vaccination from the Central European Vaccination Awareness Group (CEVAG). Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2013, 9, 362–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Domnich, A.; Panatto, D.; Arbuzova, E.K.; Signori, A.; Avio, U.; Gasparini, R.; Amicizia, D. Immunogenicity against Far Eastern and Siberian subtypes of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus elicited by the currently available vaccines based on the European subtype: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2014, 10, 2819–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Barrett, P.N.; Porthsmouth, D.; Ehrlich, H.J. Tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccines. In Vaccines, 6th ed.; Plotkin, S.A., Orenstein, W., Offit, P.A., Eds.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013; pp. 773–788. [Google Scholar]
  129. Slunge, D.; Jore, S.; Krogfelt, K.A.; Jepsen, M.T.; Boman, A. Who is afraid of ticks and tick-borne diseases? Results from a cross-sectional survey in Scandinavia. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Buczek, A.; Pilch, J.; Buczek, W. Tick preventive behaviors and practices adopted by medical students from Poland, Germany, and Thailand in relation to socio-demographic conditions and their knowledge of ticks and tick-borne diseases. Insects 2020, 11, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Riccò, M.; Gualerzi, G.; Ranzieri, S.; Ferraro, P.; Bragazzi, N.L. Knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP) of Italian occupational physicians towards tick borne encephalitis. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 5, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Ostfeld, R.S.; Price, A.; Hornbostel, V.L.; Benjamin, M.A.; Keesing, F. Controlling ticks and tick-borne zoonoses with biologicl and chemical agents. BioScience 2006, 56, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Examples of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) outbreaks in Europe related to milk and cheese consumption.
Table 1. Examples of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) outbreaks in Europe related to milk and cheese consumption.
CountryYears/MonthsNumber
of Ill/Exposed
People/Outbreaks
The Source of the Infection
(Number/% of Hospitalized Patients)
References
Slovak Republic2012–2016/
April–November, the most outbreaks from April to June
110/714/13goat’s milk, cheese (41 /37.3%)
sheep’s milk, cheese (67/60.9%)
cow’s milk, cheese (2/1.8%)
Dorko et al. 2018 [101]
Czech Republic1997–200864/nd/ndgoats’milk (36/56.3%)
sheep’s milk, cheese (21/32.8%)
dairy milk (7/10.9%)
Kriz, Benes and Daniel 2009 [36]
Hungary2007/August
2011/September–October
25/154/1
30/nd/nd
goat milk
cow milk
Bologh et al. 2010 [107]
Caini et al. 2012 [113]
Slovenia2012/May3/5/1goat milkHudopisk et al. 2013 [108]
Croatia2015/ April–May
2019/ June
7/10/1
5/nd/1
goat milk or cheese
goat milk
Markonovović et al. 2016 [109]
Ilic et al. 2020 [111]
Austria20086/nd/1self-made cheese from mixture of goat milk and cow milkHolzmann et al. 2009 [106]
Germany2016/May–June2/3/1goat milk, cheeseBrockmann et al. 2018 [39]
Poland2017/June4/nd/1goat milkKról et al. 2019 [110]
Estonia2005/ May–June27/nd/ndgoat milkKerbo et al. 2004 [33]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Buczek, A.M.; Buczek, W.; Buczek, A.; Wysokińska-Miszczuk, J. Food-Borne Transmission of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus—Spread, Consequences, and Prophylaxis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031812

AMA Style

Buczek AM, Buczek W, Buczek A, Wysokińska-Miszczuk J. Food-Borne Transmission of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus—Spread, Consequences, and Prophylaxis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(3):1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031812

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buczek, Alicja M., Weronika Buczek, Alicja Buczek, and Joanna Wysokińska-Miszczuk. 2022. "Food-Borne Transmission of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus—Spread, Consequences, and Prophylaxis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 3: 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031812

APA Style

Buczek, A. M., Buczek, W., Buczek, A., & Wysokińska-Miszczuk, J. (2022). Food-Borne Transmission of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus—Spread, Consequences, and Prophylaxis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031812

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop