Next Article in Journal
Environmental Penalties, Investor Attention and Stock Market Reaction: Moderating Roles of Air Pollution and Industry Saliency
Previous Article in Journal
District-Level Risk Factors for COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in Nepal
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Prescription of Drug Ontology 2.0 (PDRO): More Than the Sum of Its Parts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 5
10.3390/ijerph19052658
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Over-the-Counter Medicine Attitudes and Knowledge among University and College Students in Brunei Darussalam: Findings from the First National Survey

by
Ishpa Shapiah Abdullah
1,
Li Ling Chaw
1,*,
David Koh
1,
Zahid Hussain
2,
Khang Wen Goh
3,
Asma A’tiyah Abdul Hamid
4 and
Long Chiau Ming
1,*
1
PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei
2
Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
3
Faculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Ministry of Health, Bandar Seri Begawan BE3119, Brunei
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(5), 2658; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052658
Submission received: 30 August 2021 / Revised: 9 January 2022 / Accepted: 19 January 2022 / Published: 24 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optimising Drug Prescribing and Improving Medication Management: What Can We Do?)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Over-the-counter (OTC) medicine is defined as safe and effective for the general public to use, without seeking therapy from a health professional. As primary social media and internet users, university and college students are more likely to be exposed to unverified sources of health information. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour of students at institutions of higher learning in Brunei with regard to the safe use of OTC medicines. A cross-sectional study was performed using a self-administered online questionnaire, adapted from the literature with additional information from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the educational resources in understanding OTC medicine for consumers. The questionnaire consisted of 4 sections: demographic information, knowledge of OTC medicines, attitudes, and practice. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for data analysis. A total of 335 students returned a completed questionnaire. The students had a mean knowledge score of 7.1 out of 9, with more than half (53.4%) having good knowledge (knowledge score > 7), and only a small percentage (5.7%) with poor knowledge. Almost all of the students (99.7%) had a positive attitude toward OTC medicine use. Few of the students practiced improper habits in terms of OTC medicine use, such as not reading the instructions or taking more than the recommended dose. Awareness of proper OTC medicine use among students in institutions of higher learning is necessary to prevent the rise of inappropriate user practices.

1. Introduction

Over-the-counter (OTC) medicines are therapeutic products that pharmacies or retail outlets sell directly to consumers, unlike prescription medicines, which can only be dispensed based on a physician’s valid prescription [1]. OTC medications contribute to prevention and therapy for a broad spectrum of minor conditions, including but not limited to headaches, the common cold, musculoskeletal pain, allergies, and heartburn [2]. Usually, a regulatory agency chooses OTC medicines based on their safety and effectiveness profiles [3]. There are several important aspects of consumer practice of medication, including non-adherence, sharing of drugs, and self-medication. Self-medication involves a person purchasing medications to treat their symptoms without consulting a healthcare professional [4]. According to World Health Organization (WHO) drug information, self-medication is broadly accepted as an essential activity in healthcare with constant improvement in consumers’ general knowledge, education, and socio-economic status [5]. Self-medication is self-care in which a person can recognize their symptoms immediately and can usually treat these symptoms with medications that are easily accessible, such as OTC medicines [6].
Globally, inappropriate self-medication with OTC medicines has increased and is recognized as a public concern [7]. Misuse of various painkillers, vitamins, and sedatives have been reported among university students, and OTC drug misuse has become more popular among young adults [8,9]. Once these young people become older, they are responsible for making independent choices on obtaining and taking medication for their well-being [10]. Potentially inappropriate medication use from self-medication may occur due to a lack of knowledge [11]. This may include use for a wrong indication and administration of incorrect dosages [12].
Several studies have shown that university students lack knowledge of OTC medicine use and have poor attitudes toward proper medicine handling and safe use [13,14]. Poor knowledge and incorrect use of OTC medicine will lead to health risks such as adverse side effects, drug interactions and overdose. Based on information from the National Hospital Morbidity Database in Australia, young adults appear to be at high risk of paracetamol-related harm, with 4577 cases of paracetamol toxicity being recorded in 2017 [15]. Paracetamol was the most frequently used in overdoses, and a 108% increase in acute liver toxicity was reported between 2007 and 2017.
According to 2018 data presented by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, it is estimated that 6.5% of people aged 18 to 25 years old have misused OTC cough and cold medicines containing dextromethorphan (DXM) in their lifetime [16]. When a person consumes such medication in large doses, it may cause hallucinations or dissociative symptoms. The misuse of OTC medicines could be harmful to the users, affecting their health in the same way as illicit drugs.
Across Southeast Asia, self-medication practice for OTC medicine use is common. The various economic classes and healthcare systems in Vietnam, Singapore, and Thailand have reported high prevalence rates of self-medication with OTC medicines [17,18,19]. In Vietnam, self-medication of OTC medicines is a common practice among highland residents, with a prevalence rate of 83.3% in the last 12 months [17]. The overall prevalence of self-medication with OTC medicines among the working age population in Thailand is 88.2% [20]. In Malaysia, the prevalence of self-medication with OTC medicine among female students in Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) is 80.9% [21]. Unfortunately, there is no information on self-medication with OTC medicines in Brunei. However, cultural values may impact the prevalence rates. With the increase in medication consumption, it is necessary to study medication knowledge and behaviours in young adults, especially students, to understand the information needed on medication use [22].
Brunei Darussalam is a small country with a population of 453,600, according to 2020 estimates [23]. The country offers a single-payer system of universal healthcare, with its health services and funding mainly financed by the central government [24]. Even though free medical treatment and medication are provided, the general public sometimes practices self-medication for minor ailments, primarily with leftover medicines at home or medicines bought directly from pharmacies or grocery stores [4]. Most of the time, Brunei residents purchase OTC medicines according to their knowledge and experience on the effectiveness of the medication.
To the best of our knowledge, there is no documented Bruneian study assessing the use of OTC medicines. A survey targeting the younger population, especially those undergoing university or college education, will be helpful, because they are the primary users of social media and so are most likely to be exposed to unverified sources of health information. Furthermore, such a survey is needed because it may benefit public health policymakers and local health authorities as baseline data for future health promotion and intervention. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the safe use of OTC medication by determining the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour with regard to OTC medications among the students in Brunei’s institutions of higher learning.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This is a cross-sectional online survey conducted from March to April 2021 involving all students enrolled in all public institutions of higher learning in Brunei Darussalam. There are six such institutions, namely: Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD), Universiti Teknologi Brunei (UTB), Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali (UNISSA), Kolej Universiti Pergururan Ugama Seri Begawan (KUPU SB), Politeknik Brunei (PB), and Institute of Brunei Technical Education (IBTE). Full-time or part-time students enrolling in any of these institutions in Brunei Darussalam, 18 years old or above, and either Bruneian citizens or permanent residents, were eligible to participate.

2.2. Study Instrument and Distribution

The study questionnaire was adapted from a survey conducted by Tesfamariam et al. [7]. Additional information from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the educational resources in understanding OTC medicine for consumers was also applied [25,26]. The online questionnaire was provided in English language, as it is the primary medium of instruction at Brunei’s institutions of higher learning. Face validity and pretesting were conducted to ensure that the questions were understandable for the target population and suitable for the local setting. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was also determined using Cronbach’s alpha.
The final questionnaire consisted of four sections with a total of 38 questions: seven questions on demographic data, nine questions on knowledge, eight questions on attitude, and 14 questions on practice (Supplementary File S1: Survey Questionnaire Used). The knowledge section consisted of basic general questions, such as on the definition of OTC medication and some medications that cannot be taken concomitantly, including food and drug interactions. For the knowledge section, correct responses were scored as one mark, while incorrect and unsure responses were scored as zero. The total knowledge scores ranged from zero to nine, which were then categorized into “Good” (≥seven correct answers), “Moderate” (four–six correct answers), and “Poor” (<four correct answers). The attitude section was measured using a five-point Likert scale with the following response options: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, and Strongly agree. These options were scored, respectively, as one, two, three, four, and five. The positive and negative attitude depends on the cumulative attitude score, with a score of 20 and above considered as a positive attitude.
The online survey was distributed to all students at all public institutions of higher learning through email invitations sent to the students’ official email addresses at the participating universities and colleges. The email list was collated by the assistant registrars, with the email invitation consisting of an online survey link and a participant information sheet. An email reminder was sent following a two-week interval to increase the response. Sampling was not necessary because all eligible participants were invited and were therefore given a chance to participate.

2.3. Data Analysis

Data collected were summarized using descriptive statistics for the percentages, frequencies, median, and mean. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyse the association between the demographic data and knowledge. R version 4.0.4 software and Microsoft Excel version 2019 were used for data analysis [27,28]. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

2.4. Ethical Approval

The Joint Research Ethics Committee of the PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, granted full approval for this study (UBD/PAPRSBIHSREC/2020/135). Additionally, the data collected remained anonymous, and confidentiality was strictly maintained. A written consent form was provided by asking respondents to tick an option at the beginning of the online survey. Participation was on a voluntary basis.

3. Results

3.1. Face Validity and Pre-Testing

The face validity of the online questionnaire was assessed by a pharmacist, an epidemiology/biostatistics lecturer, and a physician from the PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, for readability, length, and relevance. A pretest was also conducted among 38 students, after which the responses were used to finalize the questionnaire. The internal consistency of the final questionnaire was determined using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Cronbach’s alpha values for the knowledge, attitude, and practice sections were 0.74, 0.73, and 0.73, respectively.

3.2. Demographic Data

A total of 335 respondents returned the completed questionnaire. The median age of the respondents was 22.0 years (SD = 3.0, range between 18 and 44 years). The characteristics of the respondents are displayed in Table 1.

3.3. Knowledge of OTC Medication

More than half of the respondents (53.4%) had good knowledge of the use of OTC medicine, with a mean total knowledge score of 7.1 out of 9 (Table 2). Students’ level of knowledge was significantly different in terms of academic degree (p = 0.028) and course of study (p < 0.001, Table 3). Respondents’ level of knowledge differed by academic degree level (p = 0.01), but not in terms of nationality or year of study. There was a statistically significant difference of knowledge scores between students on health science-related and non-health science-related courses (p < 0.001).
A health science-related course is defined as students who are health science majors studying health and disease in the human body, such as medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, biomedical, and nursing. A non-health science-related course is defined as students who are not health science majors studying health and disease in the human body, such as engineering, IT, religion, finance, design, and art.

3.4. Attitudes on the Use of Over-the-Counter (OTC) Medicines

Almost all respondents indicated a positive attitude toward the use of OTC medicine (Table 4). Most agreed that using OTC medication for self-medication is safe when used correctly (80.9%), and that OTC medication is convenient to obtain and use (82.1%). About half (50.1%) agreed that OTC medication can be used during pregnancy and while breastfeeding, but with caution, unless there is a warning label to avoid the medication during pregnancy or breastfeeding. No significant differences were observed when comparing attitudes among those with different demographic characteristics.

3.5. Respondents’ Practices Regarding Over-the-Counter (OTC) Medication Use

The respondents depend on various sources of information before purchasing suitable OTC medicine, such as family members (84.5%), the Internet (66.6%), friends (62.1%), a pharmacist (37.0%), a doctor (35.8%), and social media (15.8%) (Figure 1). Their reasons for choosing OTC drugs are convenience (84.8%), ability to self-treat (79.7%), time saving (68.4%), low cost (n = 150, 44.8%), and safety (n = 143, 42.7%). The respondents’ favoured OTC drugs were cold and flu drugs (75.8%), vitamins (70.4%), antipyretics (63%), painkillers (56.7%), antacids (47.8%), antidiarrheals (39.1%), and antiallergic medication (29.3%) (Figure 2).
A few (9.9%) of the respondents experienced adverse effects from OTC medicine (Table 5). In addition, 17.0% of the respondents did not know if they had ever experienced adverse events. Most respondents (83.3%) would never take more than the recommended dose, but 8.7% have consumed OTC medication over the recommended dose. Respondents reported that they had consumed over the recommended dose of paracetamol (Panadol) as the recommended dose had been ineffective. Reasons given by respondents for taking over the recommended dose included the body having adapted to taking more than the recommended dose, the medicine not being adequate, and being unaware of the dosage.
Most respondents always read the instructions on the medicine’s label before use (64.2%), check the expiry date (71.3%), and store the OTC drug in a cool, dry place or as stated on the label (60.0%). If the OTC medicine showed a change in shape, colour, or odour, 92.5% would immediately discard it.

4. Discussion

This study assessed the safe use of OTC medicine and determined the knowledge, attitudes, and practice around OTC medicine among students from public institutions of higher learning in Brunei Darussalam.
In this study, there was a significant difference between knowledge of OTC medicines depending on the academic degree (p = 0.028). There was also a significant difference between the knowledge of OTC medicine according to the course of study (p < 0.001). Health science-related students with a higher education level are more familiar with the clinical practice and medications, which improves their knowledge of OTC medicine use. Upper-year health science-related students have a better understanding of medications and self-medication since they are more exposed to the drugs than lower-year students. The finding of this study is similar to that from another study in Northwest Ethiopia, where fifth year students were found to be more likely to practice self-medication [29]. In Ethiopia, the mean knowledge score was 6.59, and 67.6% of the health science students had good knowledge of the safety and effectiveness of OTC medications [1]. More than 50% of the health science-related students had good knowledge, similar to Bruneian health science-related students (91.9%). Another study in Nepal showed that most students lack knowledge of self-medication [30]. Even though several studies showed that university students lack knowledge of the proper handling and safe use of OTC medicine, most students at English universities, and Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Brazil were shown by respective studies to have good knowledge of the use of OTC medicines [13,14]. A good level of knowledge and proper use of OTC medicine may improve the health of students, as they will be more aware that some medications cannot be taken concomitantly, and also aware of food and drug interactions. It may also reduce the risk of adverse side effects and the economic burden on the government.
We found no significant difference between the demographic data characteristics and the attitudes of respondents. Almost all students have a positive attitude toward the use of OTC medicine, with a mean attitude score of 27 out of 40. A high degree of OTC medicine consumption was apparent in 73.7% of study respondents. In Brunei, OTC medicines can be purchased and obtained directly, off the shelf, in stores, similar to in other Asian countries. This is common practice among university students in Vietnam, Malaysia, and India [17,31,32]. The majority buy cold and flu medicines, as the climates in Southeast Asia cause seasonal flu [33,34]. In Jordan and Belgium, analgesics and antipyretics were commonly used as self-medication among OTC products [35,36]. The majority of students asked their family before purchasing an OTC medicine, with the majority choosing cold and flu drugs. Moreover, in this study, those aged over 30 were more likely to purchase vitamins as self-medication, while those aged less than 30 were more likely to buy cold and flu drugs. In the United States, OTC analgesic use shows statistically significant increases among women aged 30 to 64 years old [37]. In South Korea, people aged 20 to 39 years old are less likely to use OTC medications for nutrition than those aged 19 years and younger [38].
The common reasons for choosing OTC for minor ailments were convenience, and to save time. These findings are similar to those from previous research in Germany and India, where the respondents reported that it saves time [39,40]. The most common source of information on OTC medicine was from family members (84.5%) rather than pharmacists (37.0%). This study reported that few students depend on information from social media (15.8%). This was an unexpectedly low level. In Papua New Guinea, students obtained information on OTC medicine from friends (37.2%) and family members (28.1%) [41]. In Nepal, the main sources of information referred to by medical students were pharmacists (60.3%), followed by textbooks (46.3%) and then advertisements (17.5%) [42]. Although the most common source of information is family members, pharmacists play a vital role in safeguarding the consumers from potentially inappropriate OTC medicine use [43].
Incorrect behaviours around self-medication with OTC medicine include taking more than the recommended dose, failing to check the expiry date, and rarely reading labels. In addition, continued consumption of OTC medicine with an unusual colour, odour, or shape changes is also inappropriate. About 5.7% of respondents reported that they rarely or never read the instructions on the medicine label. About 4.8% of the students responded that they rarely or never check the expiry date of the OTC medicine before using it. About 1 in 10 respondents (9.9%) reported having experienced adverse effects, while 17.7% did not know if they had ever experienced them.
Inappropriate practices of self-medication in developing countries have increased due to a lack of knowledge, inadequate medical information exposure, and confusing or unclear product labelling on different medicines [44,45]. Before using OTC medicine, reading the product label is the key to proper use, as it is taken without consulting a doctor. The findings of this study on checking the expiry dates are similar to those from a study in Eritrea where 73.9% of the respondents check the expiry dates [7]. However, 31% of respondents in Eritrea never read anything. This is different from the findings in this study, where just 0.9% of the Bruneian students never read the instructions on the medicine’s label. The results of this study on adverse effects are similar to those from the Philippines; 12% of the respondents aged over 18 with a college education had experienced adverse effects, while 11% did not know if they had ever experienced them [46]. Sometimes, the manufacturer makes changes to their OTC products, and that involves the label. This is concerning because not reading the label and checking the expiry date may lead to the build-up of those expired medications and many harmful effects [45].
Students are considered active participants in OTC medication as their knowledge influences drug use and the overall safety of drug use. Proper and appropriate self-medication practice can positively impact the individual and the healthcare system by saving lives from an acute ailment, reducing the waiting time in hospitals or clinics, reducing morbidity and decreasing healthcare costs.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the questionnaire can be further improved to ensure it is more appropriate and relevant to the topic. One main reason is that the questionnaire was challenging to construct, and there were no comprehensive tools for testing the knowledge aspect available for this study. Secondly, the intentional misreporting of behaviours by respondents may confound the survey results or hide inappropriate behaviour. Hence, the responses to the questionnaire may not reflect the actual attitudes or behaviours of the respondents. Thirdly, as the practice segment of the questionnaire was embedded with recall questions on OTC medicine use, recall bias is likely to occur. Lastly, the male to female ratio was 25:75 in this study and 41:59 for overall higher institutions of learning in Brunei, indicating a potential oversampling of females in our study [46]. This could be due to non-responsiveness of the male student population, a factor that we could not control. Our study findings should be interpreted while taking the above points into consideration.

5. Conclusions

Students from institutions of higher learning in Brunei generally have a good level of knowledge and positive attitudes toward OTC drug use. There are still some gaps around inappropriate practices with OTC medicine, especially concerning reading of medication labels, checking of expiry dates and storage. However, only a minority of respondents have such inappropriate habits. Increased awareness of the proper use of OTC medicine among students in institutions of higher learning is necessary to prevent the rise of improper practices in OTC medicine use.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19052658/s1, Supplementary File S1: Survey Questionnaire Used.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L.C., A.A.A.H.; Data curation, I.S.A., L.L.C., D.K., Z.H., L.C.M., K.W.G.; Formal analysis, I.S.A., L.L.C., Z.H., L.C.M., K.W.G.; Funding acquisition, D.K., L.C.M.; Methodology, L.C.M., L.L.C., D.K.; Supervision, L.L.C., D.K., A.A.A.H., L.C.M.; Writing—original draft, I.S.A., L.L.C., D.K., L.C.M., K.W.G.; Writing—review and editing, I.S.A., L.L.C., D.K., Z.H., L.C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Joint Research Ethics committee of the PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD/PAPRSBIHSREC/2020/135 on 8 March 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the respondents to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD), Universiti Teknologi Brunei (UTB), Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali (UNISSA), Kolej Peruguruan Ugama Seri Begawan (KUPU SB), Politeknik Brunei (PB), and Institute of Brunei Technical Education (IBTE) for disseminating the survey and appreciates all the students for answering the completed questionnaire. We thank Richard Thrift for his expert proofreading.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bekele, K.M.; Abay, A.M.; Mengistu, K.A.; Atsbeha, B.W.; Demeke, C.A.; Belay, W.S.; Yimenu, D.K. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Over-the-Counter Drugs Among Pharmacy and Medical Students: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Integr. Pharm. Res. Pract. 2020, 9, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ayele, A.A.; Mekuria, A.B.; Tegegn, H.G.; Gebresillassie, B.M.; Mekonnen, A.B.; Erku, D.A. Management of minor ailments in a community pharmacy setting: Findings from simulated visits and qualitative study in Gondar town, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0190583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Khan, M.Y.; Gupta, P.; Goswami, D.; Bihari, B.; Verma, V. A Review on Marketing of OTC Drugs. Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 3, 72–78. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mok, C.Z.; Sellappans, R.; Loo, J.S.E. The prevalence and perception of self-medication among adults in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Int. J. Pharm. Pract. 2020, 29, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. World Health Organization General Policy Issues. Drug Inf. 2000, 14, 2.
  6. Bennadi, D. Self-medication: A current challenge. J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2014, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tesfamariam, S.; Anand, I.S.; Kaleab, G.; Berhane, S.; Woldai, B.; Habte, E.; Russom, M. Self-medication with over the counter drugs, prevalence of risky practice and its associated factors in pharmacy outlets of Asmara, Eritrea. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Dabbagh, R.; Aldofyan, M.; Alzaid, W.; Alsulimani, A.; Alshamrani, S.; Alqahtani, S.; Abuhaimed, A. Prescription and over-the-counter drug misuse among female students at a Saudi university. J. Subst. Use 2020, 26, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zafar, S.N.; Syed, R.; Waqar, S.; Zubairi, A.J.; Vaqar, T.; Shaikh, M.; Yousaf, W.; Shahid, S.; Saleem, S. Self-medication amongst university students of Karachi: Prevalence, knowledge and attitudes. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2008, 58, 214–217. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Holmström, I.K.; Bastholm-Rahmner, P.; Bernsten, C.; Röing, M.; Björkman, I. Swedish teenagers and over-the-counter analgesics—Responsible, casual or careless use. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2014, 10, 408–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sansgiry, S.S.; Bhansali, A.H.; Bapat, S.S.; Xu, Q. Abuse of over-the-counter medicines: A pharmacist’s perspective. Integr. Pharm. Res. Pract. 2017, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Blozik, E.; Rapold, R.; Von Overbeck, J.; Reich, O. Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication in the adult, community-dwelling population in Switzerland. Drugs Aging 2013, 30, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. French, D.P.; James, D.H. Reasons for the use of mild analgesics among English students. Pharm. World Sci. 2008, 30, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Corrêa da Silva, M.G.; Soares, M.C.F.; Muccillo-Baisch, A.L. Self-medication in university students from the city of Rio Grande, Brazil. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Cairns, R.; Brown, J.A.; Wylie, C.E.; Dawson, A.H.; Isbister, G.K.; Buckley, N.A. Paracetamol poisoning-related hospital admissions and deaths in Australia, 2004–2017. Med. J. Aust. 2019, 211, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Benotsch, E.G.; Koester, S.; Martin, A.M.; Cejka, A.; Luckman, D.; Jeffers, A.J. Intentional Misuse of Over-the-Counter Medications, Mental Health, and Polysubstance Use in Young Adults. J. Community Health 2014, 39, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Van Ha, T.; Nguyen, A.M.T.; Nguyen, H.S.T. Self-medication practices among Vietnamese residents in highland provinces. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2019, 12, 493–502. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chui, W.K.; Li, S.C. Advice-giving on self-medication: Perspectives of community pharmacists and consumers in Singapore. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2005, 30, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kitikannakorn, N.; Sitthiworranan, C. Self-medication among undergraduate students in Thailand. Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev. 2009, 8, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chautrakarn, S.; Khumros, W.; Phutrakool, P. Self-Medication With Over-the-counter Medicines Among the Working Age Population in Metropolitan Areas of Thailand. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 726643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ali, S.E.; Ibrahim, M.I.M.; Palaian, S. Medication storage and self-medication behaviour amongst female students in Malaysia. Pharm. Pract. 2010, 8, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Sharma, D.; Gurung, D.; Kafle, R.; Singh, S. Knowledge and practice on over-the-counter drugs among adults of age group 20 and above residing in Chapapani-12, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal. Int. J. Sci. Rep. 2017, 3, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ministry of Finance and Economy D of S and D of EP and S. Report of the Mid-Year Population Estimates 2020. 2020. Available online: http://deps.gov.bn/DEPDDocumentsLibrary/DOS/POP/2020/RPT_MidYr_2020.pdf (accessed on 17 April 2021).
  24. Kifli, N. Medication Wastage and its Disposal Amongst Patients at Suri Seri Begawan Hospital in Brunei Darussalam. Med. Health 2016, 11, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Over-the-Counter Medicines: What’s Right for You? FDA. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/choosing-right-over-counter-medicine-otcs/over-counter-medicines-whats-right-you (accessed on 9 May 2021).
  26. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Status of certain additional over-the-counter drug category II and III active ingredients. Final rule. Fed. Regist. 2002, 67, 31125–31127. [Google Scholar]
  27. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 26 May 2021).
  28. Microsoft Office 2019|Microsoft 365. Available online: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/get-started-with-office-2019 (accessed on 26 May 2021).
  29. Tesfaye, Z.T.; Ergena, A.E.; Yimer, B.T. Self-Medication among Medical and Nonmedical Students at the University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Scientifica 2020, 2020, 4021586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shah, K.; Halder, S.; Haider, S.S. Assessment of knowledge, perception, and awareness about self-medication practices among university students in Nepal. Heliyon 2021, 7, e05976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mohamed Irfadh Mohamed Azhar, K. Self-medication: Awareness and Attitude among Malaysian Urban Population. Int. J. Collab. Res. Intern. Med. Public Heal. 2013, 5, 436–443. [Google Scholar]
  32. Uppal, D.; Agarwal, M.; Roy, V. Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice of self-medication among college students. Int. J. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. 2014, 3, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Young, B.E.; Chen, M. Influenza in temperate and tropical Asia: A review of epidemiology and vaccinology. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2020, 16, 1659–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. El Guerche-Séblain, C.; Caini, S.; Paget, J.; Vanhems, P.; Schellevis, F. Epidemiology and timing of seasonal influenza epidemics in the Asia-Pacific region, 2010–2017: Implications for influenza vaccination programs. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mehuys, E.; Crombez, G.; Paemeleire, K.; Adriaens, E.; Van Hees, T.; Demarche, S.; Christiaens, T.; Van Bortel, L.; Van Tongelen, I.; Remon, J.-P.; et al. Self-Medication With Over-the-Counter Analgesics: A Survey of Patient Characteristics and Concerns About Pain Medication. J. Pain 2019, 20, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Taybeh, E.; Al-Alami, Z.; Alsous, M.; Rizik, M.; Alkhateeb, Z. The awareness of the Jordanian population about OTC medications: A cross-sectional study. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2020, 8, e00553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sarganas, G.; Buttery, A.K.; Zhuang, W.; Wolf, I.; Grams, D.; Rosario, A.S.; Scheidt-nave, C.; Knopf, H. Prevalence, trends, patterns and associations of analgesic use in Germany. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2015, 16, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Cho, J.-H.; Lee, T.-J. The Factors Contributing to Expenditures on Over-the-Counter Drugs in South Korea. Value Health Reg. Issues 2013, 2, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Eichenberg, C.; Auersperg, F.; Rusch, B.; Brähler, E. Selbstmedikation: Eine bundesdeutsche Repräsentativbefragung zu Motiven, Anlässen und Informationsquellen für den Konsum rezeptfreier Medikamente. PPmP-Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol. 2015, 65, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tejasvi, P.K.; Magendran, J.; Magendran, J. A study of over-the-counter (OTC) drug usage pattern among the patients attending a medical college hospital. Med.-Legal Updat. 2020, 20, 230–235. [Google Scholar]
  41. Temple, V.J.; Meauri, G.; Lauwo, J.A. Prevalence of self-medication among students in University of Papua New Guinea. Pacific J. Med. Sci. 2011, 9, 17–31. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mehta, R.K.; Sharma, S. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Self-Medication among Medical Students. J. Nurs. Health Sci. 2015, 4, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  43. Dalton, K.; Byrne, S. Role of the pharmacist in reducing healthcare costs: Current insights. Integr. Pharm. Res. Pract. 2017, 6, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ting, C.Y.; Abd Wahab, M.S.; Lee, K.S.; Tan, R.T.H.; Ming, L.C. A cross-sectional study on the use of, preference for, and perceived reliability of mass media for drug-related information among the general public in Sarawak. Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci. 2017, 51, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Annear, B.; Sinclair, K.; Robbe, I.J. Response to “Returned medicines: Waste or a wasted opportunity?”. J. Public Health 2008, 30, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Brunei Ministry of Education Brunei Darussalam Education Statistics 2018. Available online: www.moe.gov.bn (accessed on 20 January 2022).
Ijerph 19 02658 g001 550
Figure 1. Sources of information considered by the respondents before purchasing an OTC medicine.
Figure 1. Sources of information considered by the respondents before purchasing an OTC medicine.
Ijerph 19 02658 g001
Ijerph 19 02658 g002 550
Figure 2. Respondents’ favoured OTC drugs.
Figure 2. Respondents’ favoured OTC drugs.
Ijerph 19 02658 g002
Table
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of study sample (n = 335).
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of study sample (n = 335).
Variablen (%)
Gender
       Male85 (25.4)
       Female250 (74.6)
Nationality
       Bruneian 328 (97.9)
       Permanent Resident 7 (2.1)
Higher institutions
       Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD)169 (50.4)
       Universiti Teknologi Brunei (UTB)28 (8.4)
       Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali (UNISSA)36 (10.7)
       Kolej Perguruan Ugama Seri Begawan (KUPU SB)4 (1.2)
       Politeknik Brunei (PB)89 (26.6)
       Institute of Brunei Technical Education (IBTE)9 (2.7)
Academic degree
       Certificate (HNTec/NTec/skill certificate)20 (6.0)
       Diploma 80 (23.9)
       Undergraduate 212 (63.3)
       Master 16 (4.8)
       Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)7 (2.1)
Course of study
       Health science-related111 (33.1)
       Non-health science-related224 (66.9)
Year of study
       Year 194 (28.1)
       Year 2105 (31.3)
       Year 356 (16.7)
       Year 474 (22.1)
       Year 55 (1.5)
       Year 61 (0.3)
IQR = interquartile range.
Table
Table 2. Responses to knowledge of over-the-counter (OTC) medications (n = 335).
Table 2. Responses to knowledge of over-the-counter (OTC) medications (n = 335).
StatementCorrectIncorrectUnsure
n (%)n (%)n (%)
OTC medicines are medicines you can buy without a prescription.273 (81.5)15 (4.5)47 (14.0)
We are allowed to use OTC medicines to improve our health.264 (78.8)18 (5.4)53 (15.8)
OTC medicines are used to treat, prevent or relieve major illnesses (brain and heart diseases).217 (64.8)33 (9.9)85 (25.4)
OTC medicines are used to treat, prevent or relieve minor illnesses (fever and mild headache).316 (94.3)0 (0)19 (5.7)
Interactions involving OTC medicines can sometimes produce unwanted results or make medicines less effective.234 (69.9)8 (2.4)93 (27.8)
Some OTC medicines can also interact with foods and beverages and health conditions (high blood sugar and high blood pressure).212 (63.3)9 (2.4)114 (34.0)
Pregnant and breast-feeding women should be extra cautious while using OTC drugs.301 (89.9)1 (0.3)33 (9.9)
Painkiller is an example of an OTC medication.286 (85.4)12 (3.6)37 (11.0)
Paracetamol (such as Panadol) is safe and effective when used correctly but taking too much can lead to liver damage.278 (83.0)2 (0.6)55 (16.4)
Table
Table 3. Association of demographic characteristics with level of knowledge (n = 335).
Table 3. Association of demographic characteristics with level of knowledge (n = 335).
CharacteristicsKnowledge Scorep Value
Good 1Moderate 2Poor 3
n (%)n (%)n (%)
Gender 0.127 a
       Male53 (62.4)24 (28.2)8 (9.4)
       Female179 (71.6)60 (24.0)11 (4.4)
Nationality
       Bruneian225 (68.6)84 (25.6)19 (5.8)0.282 a
       Permanent Resident7 (100)00
Academic degree
       Certificate13 (65.0)4 (5.0)3 (15.0)
       Diploma45 (56.3)27 (33.8)8 (10.0)
       Undergraduate153 (72.2)51 (24.1)8 (3.8)0.028 a*
       Master15 (93.8)4 (25.0)0
       Doctor of Philosophy6 (85.7)1 (14.3)0
Course of study
       Health science-related102 (91.9)9 (9.9)0
       Non-health science-related130 (58.0)75 (33.5)19 (8.5)<0.001 b*
a Fisher’s exact test b Chi-square test for independence * Statistically significant p value 1 Good = 7–9 marks; 2 Moderate = 4–6 marks; 3 Poor ≤ 4 marks.
Table
Table 4. Attitudes of respondents to the use of OTC medicines.
Table 4. Attitudes of respondents to the use of OTC medicines.
Statementn (%)
Using OTC medicines as self-medication is safe when you use them correctly.
       Strongly agree121 (36.1)
       Agree150 (44.8)
       Neither agree nor disagree52 (15.5)
       Disagree11 (3.3)
       Strongly disagree1 (0.3)
OTC medicines are convenient to obtain and use.
       Strongly agree160 (47.8)
       Agree115 (34.3)
       Neither agree nor disagree55 (16.4)
       Disagree5 (1.5)
       Strongly disagree0 (0)
OTC medicines can be used in pregnancy and breastfeeding but with caution unless stated on the label to avoid.
       Strongly agree62 (18.5)
       Agree106 (31.6)
       Neither agree nor disagree97 (29.0)
       Disagree42 (12.5)
       Strongly disagree28 (8.4)
I should take OTC medicines when I have minor illness.
       Strongly agree51 (15.2)
       Agree116 (34.6)
       Neither agree nor disagree124 (37.0)
       Disagree35 (10.4)
       Strongly disagree9 (2.7)
OTC medicines are safe, but I would seek a pharmacist’s advice if I am not sure about my minor illness and which is suitable for it.
       Strongly agree206 (61.5)
       Agree74 (22.1)
       Neither agree nor disagree45 (13.4)
       Disagree7 (2.1)
       Strongly disagree3 (0.9)
Table
Table 5. Respondents’ actions on the use of OTC medicine.
Table 5. Respondents’ actions on the use of OTC medicine.
Statementsn (%)
Have you ever practiced self-medication with OTC medicine(s)?
       Yes247 (73.7)
       No58 (17.3)
       Do not know30 (9.0)
When do you usually consume OTC medicine(s)?
       Symptoms are minor or manageable226 (67.5)
       Whenever I feel sick194 (57.9)
       Whenever I cannot visit doctor212 (63.3)
Have you experienced adverse effects from the OTC medicine(s)?
       Yes33 (9.9)
       No245 (73.1)
       Do not know57 (17.0)
Have you ever taken more than the recommended dose for the OTC medicine(s)?
       Yes29 (8.7)
       No280 (83.6)
       Do not know26 (7.8)
How often do you read the instructions on the medicine’s label before use?
       Always215 (64.2)
       Often60 (17.9)
       Sometimes41 (12.2)
       Rarely16 (4.8)
       Never3 (0.9)
How often do you check the expiry date?
       Always239 (71.3)
       Often52 (15.5)
       Sometimes28 (8.4)
       Rarely12 (3.6)
       Never4 (1.2)
How often do you store your OTC medicine(s) in a cool, dry place or as stated on the label?
       Always201 (60.0)
       Often90 (26.9)
       Sometimes32 (9.6)
       Rarely7 (2.1)
       Never5 (1.5)
If the OTC medicine showed a change in shape, colour, or odour, I would immediately discard the medicine.
       Yes310 (92.5)
       No5 (1.5)
       Do not know20 (6.0)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdullah, I.S.; Chaw, L.L.; Koh, D.; Hussain, Z.; Goh, K.W.; Abdul Hamid, A.A.; Ming, L.C. Over-the-Counter Medicine Attitudes and Knowledge among University and College Students in Brunei Darussalam: Findings from the First National Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052658

AMA Style

Abdullah IS, Chaw LL, Koh D, Hussain Z, Goh KW, Abdul Hamid AA, Ming LC. Over-the-Counter Medicine Attitudes and Knowledge among University and College Students in Brunei Darussalam: Findings from the First National Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(5):2658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052658

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdullah, Ishpa Shapiah, Li Ling Chaw, David Koh, Zahid Hussain, Khang Wen Goh, Asma A’tiyah Abdul Hamid, and Long Chiau Ming. 2022. "Over-the-Counter Medicine Attitudes and Knowledge among University and College Students in Brunei Darussalam: Findings from the First National Survey" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 5: 2658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052658

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop