Ecological Service Value Tradeoffs: An Ecological Water Replenishment Model for the Jilin Momoge National Nature Reserve, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area
3. Model Construction
3.1. Overview of ITSP Methods
3.2. Construction of Optimised Ecological Water Supply Model Based on ITSP Method
3.2.1. Minimum Water Constraint
3.2.2. Water Supply Capacity Constraints
3.2.3. Water Replenishment Sequence Constraints
3.2.4. Functional Zone Area Constraints
3.2.5. Eco-Efficiency Constraints
3.2.6. Net Carbon Sequestration Constraint
3.2.7. Non-Negative Constraints
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Economic Index Analysis of the Ecological Water Replenishment Project in JMNNR Using the ITSP Method
4.1.1. Economic Benefit Analysis of the Ecological Water Replenishment Project in JMNNR Using the ITSP Method
4.1.2. Analysis of the ESV of the Ecological Water Replenishment Project in JMNNR Using the ITSP Method
4.2. Analysis of the Changes in the Functional Area of the Ecological Water Replenishment Project in JMNNR Using the ITSP Method
4.3. Analysis of the NSC of the Ecological Replenishment Project in JMNNR Using the ITSP Method
4.4. Practical Assessment of the ITSP Model
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ma, J.; Hao, Z.; Sun, Y.; Liu, B.; Jing, W.; Du, J.; Li, J. Heavy metal concentrations differ along wetland-to-grassland soils: A case study in an ecological transition zone in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia. J. Soils Sediments 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno-Mateos, D.; Power, M.E.; Comin, F.A.; Yockteng, R. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10, e1001247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wu, C.Y.; Kao, C.M.; Lin, C.E.; Chen, C.W.; Lai, Y.C. Using a constructed wetland for non-point source pollution control and river water quality purification: A case study in Taiwan. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 61, 2549–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Zhao, L.; Sun, S. Optimization Model of the Ecological Water Replenishment Scheme for Boluo Lake National Nature Reserve Based on Interval Two-Stage Stochastic Programming. Water 2021, 13, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Z.; Engel, B.A.; Pijanowski, B.C.; Lim, K.J. Forecasting land use change and its environmental impact at a watershed scale. J. Environ. Manag. 2005, 76, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Xia, S.; Zhang, G.; Li, S.; Yu, D.; Yu, X. Hydrologic-induced concentrated soil nutrients and improved plant growth increased carbon storage in a floodplain wetland over wet-dry alternating zones. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 822, 153512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, T.K.; Chu, W.; Graham, N. The degradation of endocrine disruptor di-n-butyl phthalate by UV irradiation: A photolysis and product study. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 1045–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dong, X.; Hengjie, Z.; Haiting, J.; Shuqing, A. Ecological Restoration of Degraded Wetlands in China. J. Resour. Ecol. 2013, 4, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Cong, W.; Meng, C.; Cai, B.; Liu, M. An Interval Fuzzy, Double-Sided, Chance-Constrained Stochastic Programming Model for Planning the Ecological Service Value of Interconnected River Systems. Water 2020, 12, 2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W. A multi-objective optimization approach to allocate environmental flows to the artificially restored wetlands of China’s Yellow River Delta. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falkenmark, M. Growing water scarcity in agriculture: Future challenge to global water security. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2013, 371, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yin, X.A.; Yang, Z.F. A reservoir operating model for directing water supply to humans, wetlands, and cones of depression. Ecol. Model. 2013, 252, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, H.; Xu, M.; Cai, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Q. A Holistic Wetland Ecological Water Replenishment Scheme with Consideration of Seasonal Effect. Sustainability 2019, 11, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, R.; Li, R.; Li, J.; Hu, C. A hydraulics-based analytical method for artificial water replenishment in wetlands by reservoir operation. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 62, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.; Liu, Y.; Cutlac, M.; Boxall, P.; Weber, M.; Bonnycastle, A.; Gabor, S. Integrated Economic-Hydrologic Modeling for Examining Cost-Effectiveness of Wetland Restoration Scenarios in a Canadian Prairie Watershed. Wetlands 2016, 36, 577–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, Y.; Cui, B.; He, W.; Cai, Y. Identifying potential restoration areas of freshwater wetlands in a river delta. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 71, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, L.; Liu, S.; Wu, Y.; Xu, Y.J.; Chen, S.; Pang, S.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, G. Does Ecological Water Replenishment Help Prevent a Large Wetland from Further Deterioration? Results from the Zhalong Nature Reserve, China. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3449. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, B.; Li, J.B.; Huang, G.H.; Li, H.L. A simulation-based interval two-stage stochastic model for agricultural non-point source pollution control through land retirement. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 361, 38–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Q.; Zhao, K.; Liu, D.; Jiang, Q.; Li, T.; Zhu, C. The Application of a Water Rights Trading Model Based on two-Stage Interval-Parameter Stochastic Programming. Water Resour. Manag. 2016, 30, 2227–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maqsood, I.; Huang, G.H. A Two-Stage Interval-Stochastic Programming Model for Waste Management under Uncertainty. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2003, 53, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, X.; Meng, C.; Cai, B.; Zhao, W. Interval-Parameter Two-Stage Stochastic Programming (IPTSP) Model of Ecological Water Replenishment Scheme in the National Nature Reserve for Improved Suitable Habitat for Rare and Endangered Migrant Birds. Water 2020, 12, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, X.; Meng, C.; Ren, Z.; Zhao, W. Optimization of Ecological Water Supplement Scheme for Improved Suitable Habitat Area for Rare Migratory Birds in Nature Reserves Using Interval-Parameter Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Feng, J.; Lin, Q.; Lyu, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, G. Effects of crude oil contamination on soil physical and chemical properties in Momoge wetland of China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2013, 23, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, G.; Liu, Y.; Tong, S. Analysis of the causes of wetland landscape patterns and hydrological connectivity changes in Momoge National Nature Reserve based on the Google Earth Engine Platform. Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Jin, P.; Bishop, P.L.; Li, F. Upgrade of three municipal wastewater treatment lagoons using a high surface area media. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2011, 6, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Wen, Y.; Zou, L.; Wang, Z.; He, C.; Zou, C. The effects of a wetland restoration project on the Siberian crane (Grus leucogeranus) population and stopover habitat in Momoge National Nature Reserve, China. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 96, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, S.; Cao, G.; Feng, Q.; Han, G.; Lin, Y.; Yuan, J.; Wu, F.; Cheng, S. Alpine wetland ecosystem carbon sink and its controls at the Qinghai Lake. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, X.Y.; Dong, S.C.; Mi, W.B.; Li, F.J. Spatial-temporal change of carbon storage and sink of wetland ecosystem in arid regions, Ningxia Plain. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 204, 89–101. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, L.; Roulet, N.; Zhuang, Q.; Christensen, T.R.; Frolking, S. Focus on the impact of climate change on wetland ecosystems and carbon dynamics. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 100201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ecological Service Function System | Project Recommendation | ITSP Model Optimization Results | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
h = 1 | h = 2 | h = 3 | ||
Fish | 78.88 | (63.10, 90.71) | (63.10, 90.71) | (63.10, 99.91) |
Crab | 234.96 | (187.97, 270.20) | (187.97, 270.20) | (187.97, 286.65) |
Reeds | 22.32 | (23.56, 41.73) | (24.78, 41.73) | (24.98, 39.32) |
Scirpus triqueter | 27.00 | (21.60, 36.69) | (24.78, 44.12) | (29.77, 48.37) |
Water supply | 125.56 | (100.45, 144.40) | (100.45, 144.40) | (100.45, 155.14) |
Vegetation carbon sequestration | 6.92 | (6.85, 12.02) | (7.34, 12.51) | (7.71, 12.24) |
Oxygen release | 63.73 | (63.11, 110.83) | (67.62, 115.31) | (71.06, 112.75) |
Food storage | 412.82 | (338.88, 515.08) | (349.78, 536.25) | (364.31, 570.58) |
Cooling and humidifying | 307.77 | (268.82, 459.72) | (297.40, 515.23) | (335.51, 538.93) |
Plant adsorption | 308.42 | (270.77, 467.14) | (301.15, 526.16) | (341.67, 549.75) |
Pollution absorption capacity | 446.52 | (392.00, 676.30) | (435.99, 761.75) | (494.65, 795.90) |
Biological Habitat | 76.51 | (65.46, 107.89) | (70.84, 118.33) | (78.01, 124.38) |
Conservation of rare waterfowl | 307.07 | (262.72, 433.00) | (284.30, 474.92) | (313.08, 499.20) |
Soil conservation | 265.15 | (229.90, 388.13) | (252.38, 431.80) | (282.36, 452.41) |
Nutrient circulation | 20.75 | (17.99, 30.40) | (19.76, 33.84) | (22.12, 35.45) |
Research and education | 15.92 | (13.62, 22.45) | (14.74, 24.62) | (16.23, 25.88) |
Leisure and tourism | 114.51 | (97.97, 161.47) | (106.02, 177.10) | (116.75, 186.16) |
Cityscape | 62.65 | (53.60, 88.34) | (58.00, 96.89) | (63.87, 101.84) |
Natural landscapes | 25.16 | (21.53, 35.48) | (23.30, 38.91) | (25.65, 40.90) |
Lake | Project Recommendation | ITSP Model OPTIMIZATION Results | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
h = 1 | h = 2 | h = 3 | ||
Yuanbaotupao | 3.58 | (4.28, 5.58) | (3.93, 5.58) | (4.93, 5.58) |
Wulanzhaopao | 1.74 | (2.43, 2.65) | (1.80, 2.54) | (2.41, 2.69) |
Momogepao | 3.29 | (3.38, 5.13) | (3.81, 5.13) | (3.81, 5.13) |
Etoupao | 3.80 | (4.57, 5.79) | (5.02, 5.86) | (5.37, 5.93) |
Taipingshanpao | 1.26 | (1.23, 1.56) | (1.44, 1.96) | (1.47, 1.96) |
Datunpao | 1.13 | (1.42, 1.57) | (1.33, 1.57) | (1.41, 1.57) |
Gaomianpao | 3.79 | (3.03, 5.89) | (3.80, 5.91) | (3.42, 5.91) |
Huoshaopao | 0.48 | (0.69, 0.75) | (0.69, 0.98) | (0.90, 0.98) |
Wobupao | 0.92 | (1.02, 1.44) | (1.31, 1.44) | (1.23, 1.44) |
Zhushanpao | 11.71 | (7.04, 9.92) | (7.64, 12.37) | (8.79, 13.82) |
Houbutaipao | 3.79 | (3.36, 4.64) | (3.92, 4.64) | (3.92, 4.79) |
Shaolipao | 2.09 | (1.49, 1.86) | (1.60, 1.84) | (1.73, 1.87) |
Haernaopao | 10.28 | (6.39, 9.27) | (7.54, 12.11) | (9.72, 13.23) |
Wujiazi Reservoir | 0.36 | (0.51, 0.56) | (0.51, 0.40) | (0.45, 0.56) |
Qunying Reservoir | 1.20 | (1.64, 1.81) | (1.64, 1.81) | (1.23, 1.81) |
Yinghoutaipao | 0.20 | (0.27, 0.29) | (0.25, 0.19) | (0.13, 0.29) |
Nashitupao | 1.00 | (0.82, 1.14) | (0.82, 1.38) | (0.89, 1.41) |
Baoshanpao | 0.73 | (0.36, 0.47) | (0.47, 0.47) | (0.54, 0.61) |
Lake | Project Recommendation | ITSP Model Optimization Results | Rate of Change | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
h = 1 | h = 2 | h = 3 | |||
Yuanbaotupao | 3104.47 | (2483.58, 6033.06) | (3995.45, 6033.06) | (3947.37, 6033.06) | (11.95%, 94.33%) |
Wulanzhaopao | 1517.56 | (2099.06, 3369.02) | (1233.13, 3224.13) | (2230.14, 3414.51) | (22.18%, 119.82%) |
Momogepao | 2844.29 | (2275.43, 5546.37) | (2534.16, 5472.72) | (2534.16, 5472.72) | (−13.94%, 93.27%) |
Etoupao | 3301.04 | (4836.73, 7331.59) | (4625.40, 7427.34) | (2673.37, 3827.86) | (22.54%, 87.69%) |
Taipingshanpao | 1091.18 | (872.94, 2056.01) | (927.09, 2127.80) | (1191.69, 2127.80) | (−8.61%, 92.81%) |
Datunpao | 988.59 | (820.70, 909.50) | (820.70, 909.50) | (831.73, 909.50) | (−16.61%, −8.00%) |
Gaomianpao | 3273.54 | (2618.83, 6298.56) | (3411.57, 6298.56) | (3592.81, 6298.56) | (−2.01%, 92.41%) |
Huoshaopao | 426.38 | (717.60, 1073.22) | (717.60, 1073.22) | (717.60, 1073.22) | (68.30%, 151.70%) |
Wobupao | 794.89 | (1023.02, 1529.44) | (1019.34, 1529.44) | (1022.46, 1529.44) | (28.52%, 92.41%) |
Zhushanpao | 9249.17 | (7399.34, 14,633.72) | (7399.34, 15,742.08) | (8470.54, 16,240.82) | (−16.14%, 68.00%) |
Houbutaipao | 2073.14 | (1658.51, 3542.77) | (1804.90, 3542.77) | (1971.04, 3731.65) | (−12.62%, 73.93%) |
Shaolipao | 1145.5 | (916.40, 1786.87) | (943.91, 1759.76) | (1069.05, 1795.04) | (−14.76%, 55.44%) |
Haernaopao | 6461.45 | (5291.13, 10,433.41) | (5716.78, 11,409.77) | (6280.53, 11,630.61) | (−10.81%, 72.68%) |
Wujiazi Reservoir | 153.05 | (122.44, 390.28) | (122.44, 390.28) | (200.14, 390.28) | (−3.08%, 155.00%) |
Qunying Reservoir | 141.57 | (113.26, 297.30) | (187.30, 297.30) | (187.30, 297.30) | (14.87%, 110.00%) |
Yinghoutaipao | 11.48 | (19.32, 29.27) | (9.18, 29.27) | (9.18, 29.27) | (9.43%, 155.00%) |
Nashitupao | 580.37 | (480.42, 1039.50) | (564.12, 1044.67) | (564.12, 1044.67) | (−7.61%, 79.70%) |
Baoshanpao | 842.22 | (673.78, 1012.51) | (673.78, 1012.51) | (673.78, 1309.48) | (−20.00%, 31.97%) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Huang, J.; Yang, H.; He, W.; Li, Y. Ecological Service Value Tradeoffs: An Ecological Water Replenishment Model for the Jilin Momoge National Nature Reserve, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063263
Huang J, Yang H, He W, Li Y. Ecological Service Value Tradeoffs: An Ecological Water Replenishment Model for the Jilin Momoge National Nature Reserve, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(6):3263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063263
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuang, Jin, Hao Yang, Wei He, and Yu Li. 2022. "Ecological Service Value Tradeoffs: An Ecological Water Replenishment Model for the Jilin Momoge National Nature Reserve, China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 6: 3263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063263