Next Article in Journal
Role of Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening: Diagnostic Test Properties of Three Tests for the Diagnosis of HPV in Rural Communities of Cuenca, Ecuador
Next Article in Special Issue
Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study
Previous Article in Journal
Developing and Evaluating Newsletters for Parent Engagement in Sustainability via Active Garden Education (SAGE)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Predicting Response to Anthracyclines in Ovarian Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 8
10.3390/ijerph19084618
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Rare Complication during Vaginal Delivery, Hamman’s Syndrome: A Case Report and Systematic Review of Case Reports

by
Marco La Verde
1,
Adriano Palmisano
1,
Irene Iavarone
1,
Carlo Ronsini
1,
Domenico Labriola
1,
Stefano Cianci
2,*,
Ferdinando Schettino
3,
Alfonso Reginelli
3,
Gaetano Riemma
1 and
Pasquale De Franciscis
1
1
Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
3
Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(8), 4618; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084618
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 7 April 2022 / Accepted: 9 April 2022 / Published: 12 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Strategies in Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention for Women's Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SPM) during pregnancy or labor is a rare event. We presented a case report and a systematic review of the literature to provide comprehensive symptoms, treatments, and complications analysis in the pregnant population affected by SPM. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of four databases for published papers in all languages from the beginning to 1 September 2021; Results: We included 76 papers with a total of 80 patients. A total of 76% patients were young primiparous, with a median age of 24 ± 5.4 years. The median gestational age was 40 ± 2.4 weeks, with a median duration of labor of 7.4 ± 4.2 h. In 86%, the ethnic origin was not specified. SPM develops in 55% of cases during the second stage of labor. Subcutaneous swelling and subcutaneous emphysema were present in 91.4%. Chest pain and dyspnea were present in 51.4% and 50% of the patients, respectively. We found that 32.9% patients had crepitus, and less common symptoms were dysphonia and tachycardia (14.3% and 14.3%, respectively). Oxygen and bronchodilators were used in 37.7% of the cases. Analgesics or sedatives were administered in 27.1%. Conservative management or the observation was performed in 21.4% and 28.6%, respectively. Antibiotics treatment was offered in 14.3%, whereas invasive procedures such as chest-tube drainage were used in just 5.7% of patients. There were no complications documented in most SPM (70.0%). We found that 16.7% of the SPM developed a pneumothorax and 5% developed a pneumopericardium.; Conclusions: In pregnancy, SPM occurs as subcutaneous swelling or emphysema during the second stage of labor. The treatment is usually conservative, with oxygen and bronchodilators and a low sequela rate. A universal consensus on therapy of spontaneous pneumomediastinum in pregnancy is necessary to reduce the risk of complications.

1. Introduction

Pneumomediastinum (PM) is defined as free air in the mediastinal cavity [1]. It is usually the result of a known condition, such as trauma or other chronic pulmonary diseases. Nevertheless, spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SPM), also known as Hamman’s syndrome, occurs as a PM without a determined aetiology, and it can happen after physiologic or pathologic processes [2]. Labor is a physiological process that may induce an SPM, which is frequently misdiagnosed as other clinical emergency conditions [3,4]. SPM has an incidence of 1:44,000 [5,6], while its incidence during labor is approximately 1:100,000 [7]. Concerning its physiopathology, Macklin proposed that alveolar ruptures cause air dissection along bronchovascular sheaths, allowing inspired air into the mediastinum [8,9]. Numerous factors may contribute to increase alveolar pressure, such as a prolonged second stage of labor [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Nevertheless SPM occurs most frequently in young primiparous women who lack predisposing factors [2]. Breathlessness, hoarse voice, vomiting, cough or subcutaneous neck emphysema, and chest discomfort represent the main clinical signs [16]. The SPM diagnosis is clinical; in addition, a CT scan or RX thorax is practiced to exclude other complications as mediastinitis, pneumothorax and heart tamponade [17]. Chest X-ray images may show an extraluminal air presence around the mediastinal structures [18]. Occasionally, in case of occult SPM, mediastinal air can be visualized only with a CT scan [18]. SPM remains a benign pathology, and management is usually conservative [16]. Therefore, a CT scan or RX thorax is performed as part of the follow-up procedure [19]. Analgesics, bed rest, oxygen therapy, bronchodilators, and, on rare occasions, antibiotic treatment are practiced in the hospital setting [2,20,21,22,23]. We presented a case report and a systematic review of the literature to characterize the clinical presentation, treatment, and complications of SPM during pregnancy.

2. Materials and Methods

We searched on PubMed, Google Scholar, clinicalTrials.gov, and EMBASE for studies published in all languages from the beginning to 1 September 2021. We adopted MeSH headings, text words, and word variants for “Pneumomediastinum”, “Hamman’s syndrome”. We combined these with terms related to “delivery”, “pregnancy”. We screened titles and abstracts of all citations for potentially relevant papers. Full texts were assessed independently by two authors (A.P. and I.I.) for content, data extraction, and analysis. Pertinent additional manuscripts were recognized from reference lists of reviews and editorials. Records selection observes the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines [24]. We considered every publication (as a retrospective study, case report or case series) that described pneumomediastinum during labor and delivery. Reports about SPM occurring in the early gestational weeks or in nonpregnant patients were excluded. Data describing the management of symptoms and complications were reported. According to the flow diagram, we deleted 180 articles that were unsuitable to the topic of our review (Figure 1). Among the 152 records remaining, we excluded 19 citations and 12 articles with abstracts not available. Thus, full-text studies assessed for eligibility were 133: 4 review articles, 15 duplicates, 7 non-postpartum pneumomediastinum, and 1 article in press were removed (Figure 1).

3. Results

3.1. Case Report

In March 2021, our hospital admitted a 23-year-old healthy primigravida in her 41st week of pregnancy. Her prolonged pregnancy was uncomplicated, according to regular prenatal testing. She denied alcohol habits and quit smoking throughout the early stages of pregnancy. Her body mass index was 24 kg/m2. Due to hypothyroidism detected during pregnancy, she was taking Levothyroxine 50 mcg/day [25]. No other medical conditions were reported. She reported previous anaphylaxis to penicillin. Given her Bishop score of 2, according with our clinical routine, labor was induced intravaginally with a prostaglandin insert (10 mg controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert, Propess®, Ferring S.p.A, Milan, Italy) [26]. After 12 h, the insert was removed, and the next day the patient went into the delivery room, continuing induction of labor with Oxytocin 5 IU infusion at a rate of 4 mUI/minute. When she entered the delivery room, her cervix was 5 cm dilated, the fetus had a vertex presentation, and his heart rate was eurythmic. The first stage of labor endured for 2½ h and was uneventful. Amniorrhexis occurred near the end of the first stage, and complete dilatation started about an hour later when the patient began pushing vigorously [27]. The fetal well-being was monitored with computerized cardiotocography during labor induction and delivery, and no indicators of fetal distress were noted [28,29,30,31]. However, the expulsive efforts continued to be unsuccessful due to uterine hypokinesia. After 2½ h of active pushing, clinicians chose vaginal operative delivery with Kiwi Omnicup (Clinical Innovations, Muray, UT, USA) [32]. The delivery occurred after two tractions and a mediolateral episiotomy was performed by a gynecologist during the Kiwi application. The placenta was delivered physiologically in 15 min. The liveborn male child’s Apgar score was 8/9 at 1 and 5 min (3430 g). During labor, the pregnant woman reported shortness of breath and middle-side chest pain. Vital signs recorded during the physical examination were blood pressure of 130/80 mmHg, O2 saturation of 97% in spontaneous breathing and heart rate of 135 beats per minute. Despite minor exertional dyspnea, the woman’s respiratory condition remained stable. Bilateral chest auscultation revealed no abnormal breath sounds. Due to increased D-dimer readings (6400 ng/L), pulmonary embolism was investigated in the differential diagnosis and a chest angiogram (Chest angio-CT) was performed. Chest angio-CT excluded, as well, pneumothorax, pneumopericardium, and pneumomediastinum. No opacity or bulk filling deficiency in the pulmonary arteries were revealed. However, chest angio-TC revealed the presence of a pneumomediastinum, defined as a collection of air extending from the cardias to the mid-neck area, implying the aetiology of barotrauma associated with Hamman’s syndrome. There was no evidence of parenchymal or pleuro-pericardial lacerations, but the interior layer of the parietal pleura was filled with air (Figure 2).
An inspection of the neck revealed no subcutaneous emphysema. During the initial episode of dyspnea, an arterial blood gas (ABG) study was performed. It revealed a 99% oxygen saturation in spontaneous breathing and slightly alkaline blood gases (pH 7.52), normal pO2 (103 mmHg) and low pCO2 (27.9 mmHg) according to significant tachypnea. After two days, a chest X-ray was performed, which revealed no pneumothorax. The last radiograph (4 days later) revealed that the pneumomediastinum had resolved: the hemidiaphragm remained intact, and no obliteration of costophrenic angles was seen. Acute myocardial infarction was ruled out at the onset of symptoms after repeated cardiac enzyme testing. Clinical outcomes were steady throughout the hospitalization. The woman was actively monitored in the hospital for 6 days without receiving any special treatment. The patient was discharged to her home in good clinical condition, with full eupnea and no additional postpartum problems.

3.2. Review

We included 76 papers with a total of 80 patients [7,9,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104]. Patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
The majority of patients (76%) were young primiparous (median age 24 ± 5.4 years) (Table 1). The median gestational age was of 40 ± 2.4 weeks, with a median duration of labor of 7.4 ± 4.2 h. Many SPMs happened in women with a slightly increased BMI (25.1 ± 1.9 kg/m2) (Table 1). There were no common comorbidities or medical treatments among the analyzed patients. The preponderance of publications omitted information about the ethnic origin (86%). SPM occurred in 55% of cases during the second stage of labor and 16% after delivery (Table 2).
Clinically, 91.4% of SPM had subcutaneous swelling and subcutaneous emphysema (Table 3).
Half of the total manifested chest pain and dyspnea (51.4% and 50%), probably due to subcutaneous emphysema narrowing the mediastinal structures (Table 3). A third had crepitus (32.9%), and less common symptoms were dysphonia and tachycardia (14.3 and 14.3%). Additionally, vomiting, coughing, and odynophagia were seen during the SPM in 5.7–4.3 percent of all SPM patients (Table 3). The authors used a large variety of therapies, and 10 authors did not report the treatment used. Oxygen and bronchodilators were utilized in 37.7% of the cases (Table 4).
Analgesics or sedatives were administered in 27.1%. Conservative management or observation was performed in half of the cases (21.4% and 28.6%, respectively, Table 4). Antibiotics treatment was offered in 14.3%, whereas invasive procedures such as chest tube drainage were used in just 5.7% of patients (Table 4). There were no complications documented in the majority of SPM (70.0%); 10 patients (16.7%) developed a pneumothorax and 3 (5%) a pneumopericardium (Table 5). Pharyngeal rupture, hydropneumothorax, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and esophageal rupture also were uncommon sequelae reported (1.7%, Table 5).

4. Discussion

Our review summarizes the main findings of 76 studies addressing SPM during labor. During labor, Simmons first described the SPM presence [9]. Louis Hamman of Johns Hopkins Hospital, described the pneumomediastinum associated with surgical emphysema in 1945 [5]. Hamman’s syndrome appears to be more frequent in nulliparous women and typically manifests during the second stage of labor. However, clinical signs may develop in the end phase of labor or postpartum period, as in our case report. Chest pain, dyspnea, dysphonia, and skin swelling with related crepitations on palpation or movement are common presenting symptoms. When considering the benign and self-limiting Hamman’s syndrome, it is critical to rule out more severe differential diagnoses. The definition of the syndrome itself is not unique, since most authors describe Hamman’s syndrome as an SPM, while others include the presence of subcutaneous emphysema in the definition of the disease. The most common differential diagnoses include spontaneous esophageal rupture, pneumothorax, aortic dissection, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism. The pathophysiology of the SPM is still unknown, and several hypotheses have been advanced. There is probably an increase in alveolar pressure during the second stage of labor, resulting in peripheral alveoli rupture. This phenomenon can be secondary to coughing and bronchospasm associated with asthma and the Valsalva maneuver. An infrequent complication of massive pneumomediastinum is malignant mediastinum (a condition requiring surgical intervention), which manifests in very high mediastinal pressures resulting in shock. A chest X-ray is usually needed to confirm the clinical diagnosis of SPM, although diagnosis was obtained with a chest-CT in our case report. The treatment approach is various due to the lack of a uniform consensus. Oxygen therapy, analgesia, reassurance, and bed rest are commonly used to treat Hamman’s syndrome. Symptoms usually resolve on their own within a few days with no further issues. Recurrence is a rare occurrence. Amine et al. conducted a review, including 34 SPM in pregnancy or labor [3]. In accordance with our review, Amine et al. revealed that most of the SPM were younger primiparas with a term pregnancy. Our review found that the second stage of labor is usually associated with the onset of SPM. This study confirmed that the most common clinical signs were subcutaneous swelling, subcutaneous emphysema, chest pain, and dyspnea. Among the reports included in our review, patients received analgesics, rest, and oxygen until the condition was completely or nearly completely resolved. In half of the cases, symptomatic treatments or observation was administered, with no sequelae reported in the majority of SPM cases. Only a few patients required invasive treatments such as chest tube drainage. The main limitation of our review is the low prevalence of SPM and the lack of data in the literature. Secondly, the totality of the articles are case reports or case series with poor data quality. Another limitation is the wide range of treatments recommended by various hospital protocols, which influences SPM resolution and follow-up. Last, we do not know how pregnancy-induced physiologic changes expose patients to SPM development or how pre-existing risk factors influence SPM onset. The last strength comes from the large number of patients included in the review, representing the most significant number of pregnant women with SPM assessed. Furthermore, we described the papers’ symptoms, treatment, and complications in detail.

5. Conclusions

During pregnancy, labor, and delivery, spontaneous pneumomediastinum is rare. According to our literature analysis, most of the cases with Hamman’s syndrome were younger primiparas at terms of pregnancy. The initial signs of the condition are subcutaneous swelling and emphysema, which occur usually during the second stage of labor. In a conservative management setting, the main therapy is oxygen and bronchodilators. More research is required to understand the pathology’s risk factors and reach a consensus on the management of spontaneous pneumomediastinum in pregnancy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L.V. and P.D.F.; methodology, G.R.; validation, C.R.; formal analysis, I.I. and A.P.; Retrieval and extraction of data, S.C., I.I. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.L.V.; writing—review and editing, D.L. and C.R.; visualization, A.R. and F.S.; supervision, M.L.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Okada, M.; Adachi, H.; Shibuya, Y.; Ishikawa, S.; Hamabe, Y. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with spontaneous pneumomediastinum. Respir. Investig. 2014, 52, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sahni, S.; Verma, S.; Grullon, J.; Esquire, A.; Patel, P.; Talwar, A. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum: Time for consensus. N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2013, 5, 460. [Google Scholar]
  3. Amine, N.O.; Lomiguen, C.M.; Iftikhar, A.; Sahni, S. Pregnancy-associated spontaneous pneumomediastinum: A contempo-rary review. Cureus 2018, 10, e3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Banki, F.; Estrera, A.L.; Harrison, R.G.; Miller, C.C., III; Leake, S.S.; Mitchell, K.G.; Khalil, K.; Safi, H.J.; Kaiser, L.R. Pneumomediastinum: Etiology and a guide to diagnosis and treatment. Am. J. Surg. 2013, 206, 1001–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hamman, L. Mediastinal emphysema: The Frank Billings lecture. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1945, 128, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Macia, I.; Moya, J.; Ramos, R.; Morera, R.; Escobar, I.; Saumench, J.; Perna, V.; Rivas, F. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum: 41 cases. Eur. J. Cardio-Thorac. Surg. 2007, 31, 1110–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Crean, P.A.; Stronge, J.M.; FitzGerald, M.X. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum in pregnancy. Case report. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1981, 88, 952–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Macklin, C.C. Transport of air along sheaths of pulmonic blood vessels from alveoli to mediastinum: Clinical implications. Arch. Intern. Med. 1939, 64, 913–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahboob, A.; Eckford, S. Hamman’s syndrome: An atypical cause of postpartum chest pain. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2008, 28, 652–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Riemma, G.; La Verde, M.; Schiattarella, A.; Cobellis, L.; De Franciscis, P.; Colacurci, N.; Morlando, M. Efficacy of hyoscine butyl-bromide in shortening the active phase of labor: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 252, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Riemma, G.; Schiattarella, A.; La Verde, M.; Cianci, S.; Savoia, F.; De Franciscis, P.; Cobellis, L.; Colacurci, N.; Morlando, M. Usefulness of atosiban for tocolysis during external cephalic version: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 258, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leveno, K.J.; Nelson, D.B.; McIntire, D.D. Second-stage labor: How long is too long? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gimovsky, A.C.; Berghella, V. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: Extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 361.e1–361.e6. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Jamadar, D.A.; Kazerooni, E.A.; Hirschl, R.B. Case report. Pneumomediastinum: Elucidation of the anatomic pathway by liquid ventilation. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1996, 20, 309–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Elkus, R.; Popovich, J., Jr. Respiratory physiology in pregnancy. Clin. Chest Med. 1992, 13, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kouritas, V.K.; Papagiannopoulos, K.; Lazaridis, G.; Baka, S.; Mpoukovinas, I.; Karavasilis, V.; Lampaki, S.; Kioumis, I.; Pitsiou, G.; Papaiwannou, A. Pneumomediastinum. J. Thorac. Dis. 2015, 7 (Suppl. S1), S44. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kelly, S.; Hughes, S.; Nixon, S.; Paterson-Brown, S. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (Hamman’s syndrome). Surgeon 2010, 8, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gunluoglu, M.; Cansever, L.; Demir, A.; Kocaturk, C.; Melek, H.; Dincer, S.; Bedirhan, M. Diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous pneumomediastinum. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2009, 57, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Freixinet, J.; García, F.; Rodríguez, P.M.; Santana, N.B.; Quintero, C.O.; Hussein, M. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum long-term follow-up. Respir. Med. 2005, 99, 1160–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Abolnik, I.; Lossos, I.S.; Breuer, R. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum: A report of 25 cases. Chest 1991, 100, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zafeiri, A.; Mitchell, R.T.; Hay, D.C.; Fowler, P.A. Over-the-counter analgesics during pregnancy: A comprehensive review of global prevalence and offspring safety. Hum. Reprod. Update 2021, 27, 67–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Riemma, G.; Schiattarella, A.; Cianci, S.; La Verde, M.; Morlando, M.; Sisti, G.; Esposito, I.; Della Corte, L.; Sansone, P.; De Franciscis, P. Transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration for post-cesarean section analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021, 153, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gregersen, T.L.; Ulrik, C.S. Safety of bronchodilators and corticosteroids for asthma during pregnancy: What we know and what we need to do better. J. Asthma Allergy 2013, 6, 117. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Asar, S.; Jalalpour, S.; Ayoubi, F.; Rahmani, M.; Rezaeian, M. PRISMA; preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J. Rafsanjan Univ. Med. Sci. 2016, 15, 68–80. [Google Scholar]
  25. Maraka, S.; Ospina, N.M.S.; O’Keeffe, D.T.; Espinosa De Ycaza, A.E.; Gionfriddo, M.R.; Erwin, P.J.; Coddington, C.C., III; Stan, M.N.; Murad, M.H.; Montori, V.M. Subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid 2016, 26, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Austin, S.C.; Sanchez-Ramos, L.; Adair, C.D. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 202, 624.e1–624.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mercer, B.M. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 101, 178–193. [Google Scholar]
  28. Galazios, G.; Tripsianis, G.; Tsikouras, P.; Koutlaki, N.; Liberis, V. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2010, 281, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ayres-de-Campos, D. Electronic fetal monitoring or cardiotocography, 50 years later: What’s in a name? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 218, 545–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. La Verde, M.; Torella, M.; Lanza, G.; Rapisarda, A.M.C.; Morlando, M.; Cianci, S.; Colacurci, N.; Capristo, C.; Torre, C.; De Franciscis, P.; et al. Objective and quantitative evaluation of fetal hiccups by computerized cardiotocography: A prospective observational study. Ital. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2021, 33, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. La Verde, M.; Riemma, G.; Torella, M.; Torre, C.; Cianci, S.; Conte, A.; Capristo, C.; Morlando, M.; Colacurci, N.; De Franciscis, P. Impact of Braxton-Hicks contractions on fetal wellbeing; a prospective analysis through computerised cardiotocography. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2021, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Groom, K.; Jones, B.; Miller, N.; Paterson-Brown, S. A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventouse cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2006, 113, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Eisinger, R.P.; Berk, H. Pneumomediastinum and aspiration pneumonia complicating labor. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1959, 78, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Miller, H. Mediastinal and subcutaneous emphysema during the first stage of labor. South. Med. J. 1969, 62, 1007 passim. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hubbert, C.; Roberson, W.; Solomon, J. Spontaneous tension pneumothorax and mediastinal emphysema associated with anesthesia for cesarean section. AANA J. 1981, 49, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Karson, E.M.; Saltzman, D.; Davis, M.R. Pneumomediastinum in pregnancy: Two case reports and a review of the literature, pathophysiology, and management. Obstet. Gynecol. 1984, 64 (Suppl. S3), 39S–43S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jensen, H.; Asmussen, I.; Eliasen, B. Labor complicated by spontaneous emphysema. Acta Obstet. Et Gynecol. Scand. 1987, 66, 567–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Quigley, R.; Anthony, G. Spontaneous postpartum pneumomediastinum and pneumopericardium. Scott. Med. J. 1987, 32, 27–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Griffith, H.; Barnes, J. Hamman’s syndrome after a normal delivery. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1987, 7, 272–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ramírez-Rivera, J. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum. Bol. Asoc. Med. Puerto Rico 1990, 82, 359–361. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jayran-Nejad, Y. Subcutaneous emphysema in labour. Anaesthesia 1993, 48, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Seidl, J.J.; Brotzman, G.L. Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema following vaginal delivery. J. Fam. Pract. 1994, 39, 178–180. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Göçmen, A.; Gül, T.; Sezer, F.; Erden, A.; Yilmaztürk, A. Postpartum subcutaneous emphysema with pneumomediastinum. Zent. Fur Gynakol. 1997, 119, 86–88. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gaspar, L. Hamman’s syndrome: Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema occurring in labour. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 1997, 6, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shyamsunder, A.K.; Gyaw, S.M. Pneumomediastinum: The Valsalva crunch. Md. Med. J. 1999, 48, 299–302. [Google Scholar]
  46. Raley, J.C.; Andrews, J.I. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum presenting as jaw pain during labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 98, 904–906. [Google Scholar]
  47. Krause, H.; Portmann, C. Pneumomediastinum following vaginal delivery. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2000, 40, 106–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dhrampal, A.; Jenkins, J. Spontaneous cervical and mediastinal emphysema following childbirth. Anaesthesia 2001, 56, 93–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Arroyo, M. Subcutaneous emphysema during labour. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2001, 10, 307–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sutherland, F.W.; Ho, S.Y.; Campanella, C. Pneumomediastinum during spontaneous vaginal delivery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002, 73, 314–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Miguil, M.; Chekairi, A. Pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax associated with labour. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2004, 13, 117–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Duffy, B.L. Post partum pneumomediastinum. Anaesth. Intensive Care 2004, 32, 117–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Bonin, M.M. Hamman’s syndrome (spontaneous pneumomediastinum) in a parturient: A case report. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2006, 28, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. North, C.; Candelier, C. Spontaneous cervical surgical emphysema and pneumomediastinum: A rare complication of childbirth. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2006, 26, 571–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Norzilawati, M.; Shuhaila, A.; MR, Z.R. Postpartum pneumomediastinum. Singap. Med. J. 2007, 48, e174–e176. [Google Scholar]
  56. Yadav, Y.; Ramesh, L.; Davies, J.; Nawaz, H.; Wheeler, R. Gross spontaneous pneumomediastinum (Hamman’s syndrome) in a labouring patient. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2008, 28, 651–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Varela, J.; Penide, L.; Abad, A.; Benito, J.; Navia, J. Neumomediastino y enfisema subcutáneo extenso tras parto eutócico. Rev. Española Anestesiol. Reanim. 2008, 55, 637–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zapardiel, I.; Delafuente-Valero, J.; Diaz-Miguel, V.; Godoy-Tundidor, V.; Bajo-Arenas, J.M. Pneumomediastinum during the fourth stage of labor. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2009, 67, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tixier, H.; Rattin, C.; Dunand, A.; Peaupardin, Y.; Douvier, S.; Sagot, P.; Mourtialon, P. Hamman’s syndrome associated with pharyngeal rupture occurring during childbirth. Acta Obstet. Et Gynecol. Scand. 2010, 89, 407–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Khalil, H.; Aubin, F. Immediate postpartum pneumomediastinum. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. JOGC 2010, 32, 1125–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Beynon, F.; Mearns, S. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum following normal labour. Case Rep. 2011, 2011, bcr0720114556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wozniak, D.R.; Blackburn, A. Postpartum pneumomediastinum manifested by surgical emphysema. Should we always worry about underlying oesophageal rupture? Case Rep. 2011, 2011, bcr0420114137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Shrestha, A.; Acharya, S. Subcutaneous emphysema in pregnancy. JNMA J. Nepal Med. Assoc. 2011, 51, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kuruba, N.; Hla, T.T. Postpartum spontaneous pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema: Hamman’s syndrome. Obstet. Med. 2011, 4, 127–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. McGregor, A.; Ogwu, C.; Uppal, T.; Wong, M.G. Spontaneous subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum during second stage of labour. Case Rep. 2011, 2011, bcr0420114067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Khoo, J.; Mahanta, V.R. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum with severe subcutaneous emphysema secondary to prolonged labor during normal vaginal delivery. Radiol. Case Rep. 2012, 7, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Houari, N.; Labib, S.; Berdai, M.-A.; Harandou, M. Pneumomédiastin et emphysème sous-cutané du post-partum: Une nouvelle observation. In Annales Françaises d’anesthésie et de Réanimation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 728–730. [Google Scholar]
  68. Soeder, S. Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012 1. Postersitzung-Pranatal-und Geburtsmedizin I. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2012, 286, S49–S279. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kouki, S. Postpartum spontaneous pneumomediastinum ‘Hamman’s syndrome’. Case Rep. 2013, 2013, bcr2013010354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Tangudu, S.; Sabnis, H.; Rajagopalan, C. Spontaneous pneumo mediastinum in the postpartum (Hamman’s syndrome): EP1. 85. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013, 120, 51. [Google Scholar]
  71. Rasenack, R.; Lambers, K.; Gaupp, N.; Kabitz, H.-J.; Kunze, M.; Prömpeler, H. Mediastinal-und Subkutan-Emphysem in Folge einer Vaginalgeburt–ein Bericht über 2 Fälle. Z. Für Geburtshilfe Und Neonatol. 2014, 218, 128–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lea, L.; Odusoga, O.; Amu, J. PLD. 35 Intrapartum Spontaneous Facial Surgical Emphysema, Pneumomediastinum and Pneumothorax: A Case Report. Arch. Dis. Child.-Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014, 99 (Suppl. S1), A116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nagel, S.N.; Deutschmann, M.; Lopatta, E.; Lichtenauer, M.; Teichgräber, U.K.M. Postpartum woman with pneumomediastinum and reverse (inverted) takotsubo cardiomyopathy: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2014, 8, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Cho, C.; Parratt, J.R.; Smith, S.; Patel, R. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (Hamman’s syndrome): A rare cause of postpartum chest pain. Case Rep. 2015, 2015, bcr1220103603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Segev, T.; Thor, J.A.; Lentz, J.; Hong, E. Spontaneous Postpartum Pneumomediastinum: Presentation of a Rare Case and Literature Review: (172). Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 125, 58S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fernando, M.; Edmonds, H. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema during labour in an uncomplicated pregnancy: EP10. 38. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015, 122, 173. [Google Scholar]
  77. López-Hernández, J.C.; Bedolla-Barajas, M. Postpartum spontaneous pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema. Ginecol. Obstet. Mex. 2015, 83, 116–119. [Google Scholar]
  78. Hilliard, B.; Brown, L.; Boulos, A.; Rigg, D.; Chin, G. Hamman’s syndrome following precipitate spontaneous vaginal birth: EP10. 53. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015, 122, 180. [Google Scholar]
  79. Scala, R.; Madioni, C.; Manta, C.; Maggiorelli, C.; Maccari, U.; Ciarleglio, G. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum in pregnancy: A case report. Rev. Port. Pneumol. 2016, 22, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Sızlanan, A.; Akçay, O. Pneumomediastinum After Difficult Vaginal Delivery. Turk. Thorac. J. 2016, 17, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nagarajan, D.B.; Ratwatte, M.D.; Mathews, J.; Siddiqui, M. Intrapartum spontaneous pneumomediastinum and surgical emphysema (Hamman’s syndrome) in a 30-year-old woman with asthma. Case Rep. 2017, 2017, bcr-2017-219223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Berdai, M.A.; Benlamkadem, S.; Labib, S.; Harandou, M. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum in labor. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 2017, 6235076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Whelan, S.; Kelly, M. Pneumomediastinum following a prolonged second stage of labor—An emphasis on early diagnosis and conservative management: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2017, 11, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Khalid, S.; Mohapatra, S.; Haddad, B. A case of hamman’s syndrome after a prolonged labour. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2017, 32, S394. [Google Scholar]
  85. Lou, Y.Y. Hamman’s syndrome: Spontaneous pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema during second stage of labour. Int. J. Reprod. Contracept. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 6, 2622–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Khattak, H.; Lissauer, D.; Balogun, M. Hamman’s syndrome: A rare cause of surgical emphysema in labouring/postpartum women. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2017, 124, 22. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ion, R.; Ker-Reid, F.; McDonald, M. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum in labour. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2017, 124, 54–55. [Google Scholar]
  88. Khan, S.I.; Shah, R.A.; Yasir, S.; Ahmed, M.S. Post partumpneumomediastinum (Hamman syndrome): A case report. JPMA J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2018, 68, 1108–1109. [Google Scholar]
  89. Sagar, D.; Rogers, T.K.; Adeni, A. Postpartum pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema. Case Rep. 2018, 2018, bcr-2018-224800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ekanem, E.; Olowu, O. Case report: Spontaneous pneumomediastinum in second stage of labour and literature review. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 125, 48. [Google Scholar]
  91. Jakes, A.; Kunde, K.; Banerjee, A. Case report: Postpartum pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema. Obstet. Med. 2019, 12, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wilson-Baig, N.; Bhatia, K.; Kochhar, P.; Bonner, S. Intrapartum spontaneous pneumomediastinum with subcutaneous emphysema—Management and recommendations to prevent recurrence in future pregnancies. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2020, 41, 122–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hashim, M.; Linton, T.; Heraganahally, S. Chest pain and dyspnoea in a young primiparous woman following prolonged labour at a remote Australian community health centre. Rural Remote Health 2019, 19, 4615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. James, R.E.; Bhanu, C.; Hapuarachi, S.; Caraballo, E.L. Facial swelling and dysphonia during labour: A case of Hamman’s syndrome. BMJ Case Rep. CP 2019, 12, e227489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kadam, N.D.; Almeida, J.; Singh, M.; Kamath, S. Hamman’s syndrome—A rare entity. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. J. Inst. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019, 40, 725–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Madhok, D.; Smith, V.; Gunderson, E. An unexpected case of intrapartum pneumomediastinum. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 2019, 4093768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Collins, P.D.; McFerran, S.J.; Goldrick, I.; Cevallos-Morales, J.; Martin-Lazaro, J. Postpartum Bilateral Tension Pneumothoraces. Cureus 2019, 11, e4856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Opstelten, J.L.; Zwinkels, J.R.; van Velzen, E. Sudden dyspnoea and facial swelling during labour. Ned. Tijdschr. Voor Geneeskd. 2019, 163, D3044. [Google Scholar]
  99. Chooi, K.Y. Hamman’s syndrome: A case of pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax and extensive subcutaneous emphysema in the second stage of labour. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 125, 58S. [Google Scholar]
  100. Chavan, R. Hamman’s syndrome in a parturient: A case report. BJMP 2019, 12, a007. [Google Scholar]
  101. Lee, S.Y.; Young, A. Hamman syndrome: Spontaneous postpartum pneumomediastinum. Intern. Med. J. 2019, 49, 130–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shahzadi, M.; Chiu, J.; Mogla, A.; Rasheed, A.; Vasudevan, V. 814: Air in the mediastinum: An unusual postpartum complication. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 47, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Badran, D.; Ismail, S.; Ashcroft, J. Pneumomediastinum following spontaneous vaginal delivery: Report of a rare phenomenon. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020, 2020, rjaa076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Oshovskyy, V.; Poliakova, Y. A rare case of spontaneous pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema in the II stage of labour. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020, 70, 130–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 19 04618 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the study.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the study.
Ijerph 19 04618 g001
Ijerph 19 04618 g002 550
Figure 2. Chest angio-CT.
Figure 2. Chest angio-CT.
Ijerph 19 04618 g002
Table
Table 1. Maternal demographic data.
Table 1. Maternal demographic data.
Age (years), median24
±SD:±5.4
Not reported3
Etnicity, n. (%):
Caucasian10 (12.5)
African1 (1.25)
Not reported69 (86.25)
Parity, n. (%):
1st61 (76.25)
2nd4 (5)
3rd1 (1.25)
4th1 (1.25)
not reported13 (16.25)
Hours of Labor, median 7.47
±SD:±4.2
Not reported42
Weeks of Gestation, median 40.0
±SD:±2.4
Not reported29
Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), median 25.1
±SD:±1.9
Not reported31
Table
Table 2. Stage of labor related to pregnancy-associated SPM onset.
Table 2. Stage of labor related to pregnancy-associated SPM onset.
Stage of LaborNumber of Cases (%)
2nd stage44 (55) *
4th stage (after the delivery)13 (16.25)
1st stage5 (6.25)
3rd stage1 (1.25)
Not reported16 (20)
* p < 0.05 relative to other stages.
Table
Table 3. Clinical presentation of pregnancy-associated SPM (Total number = 70, not reported = 10).
Table 3. Clinical presentation of pregnancy-associated SPM (Total number = 70, not reported = 10).
Signs and SymptomsNumber of Cases (%)
Swelling & Subcutaneous emphysema64 (91.4)
Chest pain36 (51.4)
Dyspnea35 (50.0)
Crepitus23 (32.9)
Dysphonia/Hoarse voice10 (14.3)
Tachycardia10 (14.3)
Vomiting4 (5.7)
Cough3 (4.3)
Odynophagia3 (4.3)
Neck pain2 (2.9)
Chest petechiae2 (2.9)
Hearing loss1 (1.4)
Suffocation1 (1.4)
Thoracic back pain1 (1.4)
Haemoptysis1 (1.4)
Table
Table 4. Treatment in pregnancy-associated SPM (Total number = 70. Not reported = 10).
Table 4. Treatment in pregnancy-associated SPM (Total number = 70. Not reported = 10).
TreatmentNumber of Cases (%)
Oxygen & bronchodilators25 (35.7)
Analgesics/Sedatives19 (27.1)
Observation/None20 (28.6)
Conservative/Symptomatic treatment (IV Fluids, other)15 (21.4)
Antibiotics10 (14.3)
Chest tube drainage4 (5.7)
Table
Table 5. Complications associated with SPM (Total cases = 60, Not reported = 20).
Table 5. Complications associated with SPM (Total cases = 60, Not reported = 20).
TreatmentNumber of Cases (%)
None42 (70.0)
Pneumothorax10 (16.7)
Pneumopericardium3 (5.0)
Pharyngeal rupture1 (1.7)
Hydropneumothorax1 (1.7)
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy1 (1.7)
Esophageal rupture1 (1.7)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

La Verde, M.; Palmisano, A.; Iavarone, I.; Ronsini, C.; Labriola, D.; Cianci, S.; Schettino, F.; Reginelli, A.; Riemma, G.; De Franciscis, P. A Rare Complication during Vaginal Delivery, Hamman’s Syndrome: A Case Report and Systematic Review of Case Reports. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084618

AMA Style

La Verde M, Palmisano A, Iavarone I, Ronsini C, Labriola D, Cianci S, Schettino F, Reginelli A, Riemma G, De Franciscis P. A Rare Complication during Vaginal Delivery, Hamman’s Syndrome: A Case Report and Systematic Review of Case Reports. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(8):4618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084618

Chicago/Turabian Style

La Verde, Marco, Adriano Palmisano, Irene Iavarone, Carlo Ronsini, Domenico Labriola, Stefano Cianci, Ferdinando Schettino, Alfonso Reginelli, Gaetano Riemma, and Pasquale De Franciscis. 2022. "A Rare Complication during Vaginal Delivery, Hamman’s Syndrome: A Case Report and Systematic Review of Case Reports" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 8: 4618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084618

APA Style

La Verde, M., Palmisano, A., Iavarone, I., Ronsini, C., Labriola, D., Cianci, S., Schettino, F., Reginelli, A., Riemma, G., & De Franciscis, P. (2022). A Rare Complication during Vaginal Delivery, Hamman’s Syndrome: A Case Report and Systematic Review of Case Reports. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084618

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop