Next Article in Journal
Sexual and Reproductive Health and Education of Adolescents during COVID-19 Pandemic, Results from “Come Te La Passi?”—Survey in Bologna, Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Functional Properties of Meat in Athletes’ Performance and Recovery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biomechanical Comparison between Down-the-Line and Cross-Court Topspin Backhand in Competitive Table Tennis

1
Department of Physical Education, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
2
Department of Exercise Science, School of Physical Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
3
Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Faculty of Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(9), 5146; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095146
Submission received: 2 March 2022 / Revised: 18 April 2022 / Accepted: 20 April 2022 / Published: 23 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sport and Health)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the kinematic and kinetic differences of the racket arm when balls were hit cross-court (CC) and down the line (DL) by topspin backhand. Eight elite female players participated and were instructed to hit the ball down the line and cross-court using a topspin backhand. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected. The results show that at the impact, participants had a greater wrist flexion angle in DL than CC (p = 0.017). The angular velocity of shoulder flexion (p = 0.038), shoulder abduction (p = 0.006) and thorax–pelvis internal rotation (p = 0.017) was faster when participants impacted the ball DL than CC. As for the joint kinetics, the shoulder external rotation moment was greater in CC than DL (p = 0.043). For a high-quality DL technique, it is important to exhibit a greater wrist flexion and have faster adduction and flexion in the shoulder, as well as faster internal rotation in thorax–pelvis, while having a smaller wrist flexion and more external rotation power in the shoulder are important to perform a CC at the impact. If these key and different factors of hitting CC and DL are ignored, it may lead to failure to complete a high-quality shot.
Keywords: table tennis; backhand; topspin; kinematics and kinetics; down-the-line and cross-court table tennis; backhand; topspin; kinematics and kinetics; down-the-line and cross-court

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xing, K.; Hang, L.; Lu, Z.; Mao, C.; Kang, D.; Yang, C.; Sun, Y. Biomechanical Comparison between Down-the-Line and Cross-Court Topspin Backhand in Competitive Table Tennis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095146

AMA Style

Xing K, Hang L, Lu Z, Mao C, Kang D, Yang C, Sun Y. Biomechanical Comparison between Down-the-Line and Cross-Court Topspin Backhand in Competitive Table Tennis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(9):5146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xing, Kaige, Lanping Hang, Zijun Lu, Chuangui Mao, Dong Kang, Chen Yang, and Yuliang Sun. 2022. "Biomechanical Comparison between Down-the-Line and Cross-Court Topspin Backhand in Competitive Table Tennis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 9: 5146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095146

APA Style

Xing, K., Hang, L., Lu, Z., Mao, C., Kang, D., Yang, C., & Sun, Y. (2022). Biomechanical Comparison between Down-the-Line and Cross-Court Topspin Backhand in Competitive Table Tennis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095146

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop