Next Article in Journal
Factors Affecting Preventive Health Behaviors against COVID-19 in Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Feasibility of Maintaining Biological Phosphorus Removal in A-Stage via the Short Sludge Retention Time Approach: System Performance, Functional Genus Abundance, and Methanogenic Potential
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 9
10.3390/ijerph19095488
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Systematic Review of Head Impacts and Acceleration Associated with Soccer

by
Ioannis Basinas
1,2,
Damien M. McElvenny
1,2,
Neil Pearce
3,
Valentina Gallo
4 and
John W. Cherrie
1,5,*
1
Institute of Occupational Medicine, Research Avenue North, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK
2
Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
3
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
4
Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen, 8911 CE Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
5
Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(9), 5488; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095488
Submission received: 14 March 2022 / Revised: 6 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 1 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Exercise and Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Epidemiological studies of the neurological health of former professional soccer players are being undertaken to identify whether heading the ball is a risk factor for disease or premature death. A quantitative estimate of exposure to repeated sub-concussive head impacts would provide an opportunity to investigate possible exposure-response relationships. However, it is unclear how to formulate an appropriate exposure metric within the context of epidemiological studies. We have carried out a systematic review of the scientific literature to identify the factors that determine the magnitude of head impact acceleration during experiments and from observations during playing or training for soccer, up to the end of November 2021. Data were extracted from 33 experimental and 27 observational studies from male and female amateur players including both adults and children. There was a high correlation between peak linear and angular accelerations in the observational studies (p < 0.001) although the correlation was lower for the experimental data. We chose to rely on an analysis of maximum or peak linear acceleration for this review. Differences in measurement methodology were identified as important determinants of measured acceleration, and we concluded that only data from accelerometers fixed to the head provided reliable information about the magnitude of head acceleration from soccer-related impacts. Exposures differed between men and women and between children and adults, with women on average experiencing higher acceleration but less frequent impacts. Playing position appears to have some influence on the number of heading impacts but less so on the magnitude of the head acceleration. Head-to-head collisions result in high levels of exposure and thus probably risk causing a concussion. We concluded, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that estimates of the cumulative number of heading impacts over a playing career should be used as the main exposure metric in epidemiological studies of professional players.

1. Introduction

During play and training, soccer (also known as association football or just football) players experience repeated head impacts from contact with the ball, other players, the ground or objects such as goal posts. These cause the brain to move rapidly within the skull, potentially creating chemical changes and sometimes stretching and damaging brain cells [1]. In some circumstances, these impacts can cause concussion, which is defined according to the Berlin Expert Panel as an “alteration in brain function, caused by an external force”. Several symptoms may be used to clinically diagnose concussive head injuries. Symptoms such as the loss of consciousness (which is not a requirement for a diagnosis of concussion) may include sequelae that result in a range of physical, cognitive, emotional and sleep-related symptoms [2], which may persist for weeks. However, in most cases the impacts experienced during soccer play result in few or no acute symptoms, and these are often referred to as sub-concussive head impacts [3] or repetitive sub-concussive head impacts (RSHIs).
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a relatively newly characterised pathological entity that is diagnosed at autopsy, has been linked with repeated head trauma and/or concussion experienced by boxers [4] and American footballers [5]. There have been reports of CTE in a small number of professional soccer players [6]. However, the pathological characterisation of the condition remains at a preliminary stage [7]. There is some evidence that mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) from playing sport can accelerate cognitive decline [8,9], and other neurodegenerative outcomes [10]. However, the long-term effects of sport-related mTBI is not well understood [11,12]. Recently, a study found mortality from neuro-degenerative diseases in former professional footballers in Scotland to be over three times that of population controls, although this contained no quantitative estimates of exposures to heading [13]; and further analysis of the data revealed the risk to be higher in footballers who played as de-fenders compared with other playing positions [14]. Currently, there is very little robust evidence from longitudinal epidemiological studies of clinical neurodegenerative disease in former professional soccer players who were exposed to RSHIs from heading balls and, occasionally, concussions. Thus, longitudinal epidemiological studies are needed to clarify these issues, ideally of a prospective design. However, since such studies on current players have only recently been established [15] it is important to also explore the presence of any effects and their association with exposure among former players. For this, retrospective study designs incorporating an objective exposure assessment are needed.
There is no clear evidence of the best exposure metric to assess the long-term risk from RSHIs and/or concussion in soccer players, although it is likely, as for many occupational exposures, that the cumulative exposure over all or part of life would be appropriate [16]. The magnitude of head impacts in soccer are generally characterised using accelerometers attached to the head that record both linear (expressed as m/s2 or sometimes relative to the acceleration due to gravity ‘g’ = 9.81 m/s2) and angular acceleration (rads/s2) or angular velocity (rads/s). Different methods and measurement strategies have been used to characterise acceleration, both during play and in the laboratory [17]. In addition, the number of impacts during a period are important in determining cumulative exposure [18]. However, it is uncertain whether factors such as the interval between impacts, reflecting the recovery time, or the age of the player should be incorporated into an exposure metric. It is known from neuroimaging studies that recovery time is very important for concussions [19], although its importance for RSHIs is less clear.
Quantitative retrospective estimates of cumulative exposure will require the development of a conceptual and/or empirical model that could account for the total number, frequency and types of head impacts, and secular changes over time in the professional soccer game, e.g., changes in the design of the ball, and speed of the game, as has been done for other areas of occupational epidemiology [20]. The development of such a model will require good knowledge of the factors potentially affecting exposure, i.e., the so called “exposure determinants”, but databases of exposure measurements that could support such a development are not currently available. In addition, previous review studies of the published literature in acceleration from heading have been primarily descriptive [21,22] or were performed on an ad hoc basis aiming, for example, either to evaluate the magnitude of related impacts across different sports [23] or to discuss the effects of single factors such as neck strength [24] or age [25].
The aim of this paper is to systematically collate, review and analyse the published scientific evidence on factors determining the magnitude of head impact acceleration, both linear and angular, during experiments and the practice and playing of the game of soccer to inform the assessment of exposure in retrospective epidemiological studies of current and former professional players.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Searches

We identified relevant research papers reporting measured acceleration values from impacts to the head during experiments, soccer play and training. Initially our searches focused on papers published in PubMed and Web of Science indexed periodicals. However, for reasons of completeness, these searches were then expanded further to include any relevant papers published in Scopus and SPORTDiscus databases. Searches were performed according to the following search string: (“soccer” OR “football”) AND (“head impact” OR “heading” OR “header”) AND (“acceleration*” OR “instrumentation” OR “biomechanics” OR “accelerometer”).
Restrictions on period of publication during searches were applied only according to the date the search was performed (i.e., prior to December 2021). Results were further supplemented from additional references obtained through the reference lists in the identified publications and personal knowledge of the field. To be included in the review, papers needed to:
(a)
Concern the game of association football;
(b)
Report original measurement results of linear and/or angular acceleration during soccer play or practice; or
(c)
Be of either observational or experimental design (simulation) involving humans in realistic scenarios of play.
Papers were excluded if they were:
(a)
Not written in English;
(b)
Did not include original measurement data on head acceleration or did not adequately report the type of measurements they performed;
(c)
Were theoretical or experimental simulations of head impacts with no human involvement;
(d)
Were studies that involved humans but measured head acceleration solely on scenarios involving a pendulum; or
(e)
Were conference abstracts, commentaries, or literature reviews, (although for the latter included reference lists were screened to identify further relevant studies).

2.2. Review Process and Data Extraction

Following retrieval of the search results, the identified papers were screened by title and abstracts against the above criteria. Papers that could not be clearly excluded by the above criteria were retained for full text evaluation. For papers not excluded during this process, the full text was retrieved and evaluated. Identified studies that fulfilled the above criteria were reviewed in full and had their data extracted.
Data extraction was carried out using a dedicated MS Excel template with separate spreadsheets for storing data related to the measurements of acceleration, the frequency of head impacts and the reported results by the identified studies on the effects of potential determinants, i.e., factors affecting the intensity and frequency of head impacts. Extracted parameters included: the manuscript reference (authors, title, publication year); the applied design (observational or experimental); the population characteristics (e.g., gender, and age); a description of applied measurement methods including of any applied threshold; a description of the scenario and activity considered; the number of measurements performed and head impacts experienced; and the results of the measurements of head linear and angular acceleration. The spreadsheet containing the reported information on the frequency of the head impacts observed during play covered only observational studies and included data on previously mentioned study design, population characteristics and measurement data stratified by playing position. For exposure determinants, registered parameters included general information on the study and its design (i.e., observational or experimental), the name of the examined determinant/s, the outcome investigated (i.e., peak linear and/or angular acceleration, head impact frequency), the methods used to analyse the collected data and the result of the analyses undertaken.
Paper reviewing and data extraction was performed by one experienced human exposure scientist (IB). Quality control was provided by a second human exposure scientist (JWC) who independently reviewed and extracted the data for 10% of the selected papers (including papers regarded as more complex). The extracted data from both reviewers were compared, and disagreements discussed and resolved.
Existing criteria for the evaluation of observational epidemiological studies or studies in sports are not relevant for the evaluation of occupational exposure studies whereas dedicated formal criteria for evaluating such studies are at present also not available. To evaluate the quality of the individual studies included and the risk of bias we therefore created and implemented an ad hoc set of quality criteria that considered attributes of the monitoring study design (adequate description and potential bias), population representativeness, and the reporting of the characteristics of the population (e.g., age, sex, experience), measurement methods, sample size, the distribution of the acceleration measurements and whether or not impacts have been confirmed. Each of these attributes was scored depending on whether the attribute was present or absent on a scale between 1 and −1, respectively. Only design parameters relevant to the acceleration measurements were evaluated in this process. The complete matrix of the attributes, their characteristics and the scores assigned are summarised in the online supplement (Supplementary Table S1). The assigned score results were accumulated and their total used to assess the overall quality of the included studies. Studies were considered as of high quality if they had achieved a total score of ≥6, of medium quality if they their score was between 4 and 5 inclusive and of low quality if their total score was ≤3.

2.3. Data Rectification

Whenever required the provided linear and angular acceleration results were standardised to the relevant SI units (i.e., m/s2 and rad/s2). Summarised statistics for these metrics extracted from the papers included the reported number of measurements in the series, the arithmetic (AM) and geometric mean (GM), the range or selected percentiles of the distribution of measurements and the standard (SD) or geometric standard deviations (GSD). Whenever the AM, GM and GSD values were not available, where possible, these were calculated from the information available using the equations previously provided by Lavoue et al. [26]. For frequency of head impacts three different statistics were derived and/or, whenever possible, calculated by the information available: (a) number of head impacts per activity, (b) average number of head impacts per player per activity, and (c) average number of head impacts per hour of play per player. Age of player was defined as being of early youth (<14 yrs old), youth (15–21 yrs) and adult (>21 yrs), or mixtures of these categories. Assignment of records to these categories was based on the reported mean age of the players participating in the corresponding measurement series.

2.4. Data Analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using Stata 17 (Statacorp, 2021. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX, USA: Statacorp LLC.). All analyses were based on GM values. Comparisons between factors potentially influencing the magnitude of linear and angular acceleration during head impacts were performed using standard statistical approaches. These included graphical representation and statistical tests were carried out based on t-tests based on simple linear regression with no constant. The relationship between linear and angular acceleration was explored using weighted pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients.

3. Results

A schematic representation of the search results and review process is shown in Figure 1. Overall searches resulted in 1059 candidate papers identified. Following removal of duplicates and screening by title and abstract 119 papers were retrieved and read in full resulting in 59 papers that fulfilled the criteria and were included in the final review. From those studies, 26 followed an observational design, 32 were experimental studies and one had both an experimental and observational component.
Table 1 contains the characteristics of the 27 observational studies included in the review, the earliest of which was published in 2012. Eight studies investigated early youth players (i.e., ≤14 yrs old), 18 studied youth players (i.e., aged between 15–21 yrs old), and one included a mixture of youth and adult players. Twenty-one studies included measurements on females, twelve on males and one study reported its results without stratification by sex. Most of the studies (n = 13) used accelerometers mounted on the side of the head somewhere behind the ear, four used customised headbands, six used a customised mouth guard and one each used accelerometers mounted on the back of the head or in the ear. Some studies (n = 17) used observation of play (either through video recordings or by observing the actual game) to confirm whether the accelerometer data were linked to heading or another external impact event.
Table 2 contains the characteristics of the 33 experimental studies. Examined scenarios varied considerably between these studies. Seventeen of the studies measured acceleration in youth players, nine in adults and another seven combined players of different ages. Seventeen studies measured acceleration in males, two in females, thirteen in both males and females, reporting the results either individually for the two sexes (n = 4) or combined (n = 9), and one did not specify the sex of the participants. The locations of the accelerometers for the experimental studies were much more varied than for the observational studies. A customised mouth guard was used in eight studies. Two used an accelerometer held in place with an elastic skull cap, seven had the sensor mounted on a headband, three behind the ear, another on a helmet and another on an unspecified location on the outer head. One study used multiple approaches including customised mouth guards and sensors mounted behind the ear and in an elastic skull cap. Two studies used a bite plate, one had sensors mounted in various places on manikins, two studies located the sensor in the ear, three on the base of the skull and two studies used motion capture with video camera data.
Mean peak linear and angular acceleration (PLA, PAA) varied widely between studies. The geometric means for impacts during observational studies of play or training ranged from around 30 m/s2 and 240 rad/s2 to around 450 m/s2 and nearly 7000 rad/s2. Figure 2 shows a scatter plot of the mean PLA against the corresponding PAA values for the studies that measured both (red for female and blue male; open symbols for observational studies and boxes or diamonds for experimental studies). The data are subdivided into those from experimental studies with humans and/or manikins and observational studies involving free play or training, with the area of each symbol proportional to the number of measurements in the dataset. For comparison we have also added PLA data from everyday non-sport activities as green circles [59]. The pattern of results differs depending on the study design, although in each case there is an apparent linear relationship between both measures of acceleration (for the observational studies the pairwise correlation coefficient, weighted by the number of measurements, was 0.90, p < 0.001). Overall, mean PLA were on average higher for males compared to females in observational studies (172 vs. 159 m/s2, p < 0.001). Excluding the studies by Patton et al. [20,25], which include unusually high PLA data from non-header head impacts, results in the means for females being higher than those for males with PLA of 156 and 136 m/s2, respectively (p < 0.001). Because of the strong correlation between linear and angular acceleration we have restricted the remainder of the paper to report linear acceleration, although the complete data are available in the online Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. Also, because the experimental studies have a different relationship between linear and angular acceleration compared with observational studies, probably because of constraints on the way the ball was headed in the former studies, and because they should better represent the forces experienced during actual play we have restricted the summarisation of the data to observational studies.
Figure 3 summarises the observational data by the strategy used by the researchers to locate the accelerometers on the players, grouped as mounted on the exterior head and using in-mouth sensors. Mean acceleration for the in-mouth location was 86 m/s2 compared to 196 m/s2 when the sensor was attached to the outer head; these data were significantly different (p < 0.001). Most of the studies used a threshold below which data were discounted, typically 10 g (98 m/s2), although some studies used a lower threshold (3 or 7 g) and some a higher threshold (20 g) (data not shown). The limited data available suggest that the measured PLA is strongly dependent on the choice of threshold with the median acceleration for the higher threshold being 1.8 times the median for the more typical threshold. Most studies used visual confirmation of an impact for it to be accepted as a genuine head impact rather than a spurious event recorded by the accelerometer. The PLA measured with observational confirmation were on average slightly lower than the data where impacts were unconfirmed (data not shown).
Not all the identified studies recorded the number of head impacts during a match or period of play, but for the 25 observational studies that did, we have summarised the data in Figure 4. Note there are also several studies that recorded the number of head impacts in soccer but did not measure acceleration of the head and therefore these studies were also not included in our review. The mean number of head impacts per hour from heading was statistically significantly higher in males than females, (2.4 vs. 0.5 per hour, p = 0.003) and for any other type of head impacts (6.1 vs. 1.4 per hour, p = 0.014). The number of impacts experienced was somewhat higher in defenders compared to the other positions, although when broken down by sex there were insufficient numbers to support any meaningful analyses (data not shown).
Figure 5 shows the data on geometric mean PLA for the type of head impact, grouped by ‘heading’, ‘any type of head impact (i.e., mixture)’ and ‘other than heading head impact’. The geometric mean linear acceleration associated was 176 m/s2 for headers and 169 m/s2 for other head impacts. The differences between the sexes for both types of head impact were statistically significant with females experiencing higher intensity impacts (p < 0.001).
The observational studies covered early youth (age under 14 years) and youth players (age 15 to 21) (Figure 6). The geometric mean PLA was lower for the youngest players (early youth), 99 m/s2) and higher for older players (192 m/s2 for youth). The differences between these age groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Table 3 summarises data from the individual studies reporting potential determinants of head acceleration and frequency associated with heading. Gender was subject of investigation in 13 studies, age in seven studies, size of head and/or neck in six, type of event in 15, playing position in six, and the type of head impact event in 20. Other, less studied, exposure determinants examined included ball characteristics and speed, heading technique, and game half.
There were suggestions that midfield players and defenders were likely to experience more head impacts than forwards and goalkeepers [6,7,10]. Similarly, one study reported somewhat lower acceleration from impacts for goal keepers compared with players in other positions [7] whereas another suggested defenders to experience significantly higher acceleration than players of other positions. Differences in PLA or PRA associated with different types of headers were also reported. While in some cases these were statistically significant these differences were rather small in absolute values. For example, Sandmo and colleagues measured the acceleration for six male youth players who completed five different heading drill exercises [18]. The highest median PLA was for finishing headers (around 320 m/s2) and the lowest for direct short headers (around 90 m/s2). The data from the included observational studies were broadly consistent with these findings. For example Lamond et al. [10] reported PLA that ranged from a median of 200 m/s2 for headers from passes to 290 m/s2 for headers regarded as shots at goal.
Figure 7 shows a forest plot of the data from the individual observational studies subdivided by age. Each data item reflects the activities described by the authors of the studies, for example ‘HG = header to ground contact’, ‘HH = head-to-head collision’ as described in the figure caption. The figure illustrates the heterogeneity between the studies and activities, and the contrast between the ages.
Activity: H = Header; NH = Any non-head impact; BH = Ball to head; AI = Any head impact; NC = Type of head contact not clear; HG = Head hit ground; PH = Passing header; CH = Clearing header; HH = Head to head collision; OH = Other player collided with head.
The complete results of the quality assessment of the included studies is provided in the online supplement (Supplementary Table S4). Overall, 34 studies have achieved a score ≥6, 18 a score between 4 and 5 and the remaining seven had a score ≤3. Of the 34 studies with a quality score ≥6, half were of observational design and the other half of experimental design. Note that this assessment does not account for the relative merits of the measurement methods applied (e.g., measuring with a mouth guard vs. with sensor attached over the mastoid process) which in general can also impact on the reliability of the acquired estimates to a degree such that it cannot directly reflect the exposure of professional adult players. Overall, there is little evidence for large differences in PLA by playing position, although the difference between males and females is clear. The evidence suggests children have a low frequency of heading and experience lower PLA than adults from each header.

4. Discussion

The accelerometers used to evaluate head impacts amongst soccer players measure both angular and linear acceleration. For the observational studies, there was a strong correlation between these two measures and therefore for the purposes of characterising exposure for retrospective epidemiological studies it is sufficient to consider just one; we have selected PLA for this purpose. Angular acceleration measurements should still form part of any exposure characterisation studies and the best exposure metric for prospective epidemiological studies may be a more complex combination of these kinematic measures [62,63]. In contrast to the observational studies, the data from experimental studies showed a different and weak correlation between linear and angular acceleration (r = 0.19, p < 0.001), and in general for a given angular acceleration the PLA appears to be higher in experimental than observational studies. It is not clear why there is this difference, or whether heading a ball gives rise to similar levels of linear acceleration in the necessarily constrained circumstances of experimental situations compared to free play. Clearly experimental studies are a poor proxy for normal play and thereby have limited relevance in assessing cumulative exposure over a playing career. However, data from experimental studies could provide useful data on specific aspects of heading to assess relative effects, e.g., studies of the difference in ball design or weight [33], the type of heading [18], or deliberate impacts to the head such as from shoulder-to-head or head-to-head impacts [35].
The location and fixing of the acceleration sensor to the head is an important factor in the measurement. Sensors located in a mouth guard seem to provide much lower measures of acceleration than sensors more loosely mounted on the side of the head. Sensors attached on the outer head have previously been reported to over predict exposure in terms of acceleration due to motion between the sensor and the skull during use [6,45]. The threshold for the minimum acceleration recorded also affects the data obtained, although additional visual confirmation of head impacts to exclude spurious sensor data appears to make less difference in the measurement of linear acceleration. It has been suggested that data analysis using algorithms, a common approach to remove spurious impacts from a measurement series, are currently inadequate to identify genuine head impacts during play [20]. It is important to standardise measurement methodology to obtain comparable data between studies, and we recommend that researchers use a mouth guard-mounted accelerometer or similar rigid fixing, with a threshold of 10 g for linear acceleration from individual impacts (around the maximum encountered in everyday non-sport activities). Visual confirmation will further improve the reliability of measurement data and could provide additional context for the impact that could aid data analysis.
Non-ball events, such as head-to-head contacts, can produce linear acceleration two to five times that of ball contacts and may also cause concussion. Particular emphasis should be placed on identifying and quantifying these events in measurement studies. For example, Lamond et al. [10] found that median PLA from head-to-head contacts amongst collegiate female players was 350 m/s2 compared to around 200 m/s2 during headers from passes. However, Nevins et al. [11] carried out an observational study of eight male high school soccer players over a playing season, and identified that 18% of the impacts were due to player-to-player contacts, but for these the median PLA was around half of that experienced during heading events. Others similarly found lower PLA associated with non-heading compared with heading events [18,21]. In contrast, the experimental studies involving dummy heads consistently showed higher acceleration. Hanlon et al. [64] found increasing PLA as impact speed increased in simulated head-to-head collisions, around 300 m/s2 at 2.5 m/s and around 700 m/s2 at 3.5 m/s with corresponding ball-to-head values around 150 m/s2 at 8 m/s impact speed. In similar experiments, Withnall et al. [35] found elbow-to-head impacts produced mean PLA of 210 m/s2 and hand/wrist/forearm-to-head 200 m/s2, and head-to-head contacts produced mean PLA of around 300 m/s2 at 1.5 m/s impact speed and around 800 m/s2 at 3 m/s.
Reported geometric mean PLA varied from around 30 to over 400 m/s2, although most of the measurements ranged between about 40 and 350 m/s2. This is a very narrow range of data when compared to other occupational exposure situations, e.g., chemical exposures [65], which probably reflects the similarity of exposure from heading and other head impacts while playing soccer. Most observational studies set a minimum threshold, typically between around 50 and 200 m/s2 below which data are discounted, although most commonly 98 m/s2 (10 g). This value is consistent with excluding the accelerations typically experienced in everyday life which are shown in Figure 2; where acceleration from individual events seldom exceeds 100 m/s2 or 1000 rad/s2 [59]. Also, there is an upper limit to the acceptable acceleration in normal play because above around 1000 m/s2 there is a clear risk that the player will suffer a concussion [12,66]. It is though important to note that risks at lower levels than those cannot be excluded, whereas interpretations need be cautious given the demonstrated differences in measured acceleration levels between in-mouth and outer head methodologies. Nevertheless, this relatively narrow range of exposure from individual heading events suggests that in a retrospective epidemiological study it may be sufficient to assume that on average all headers contribute equally to exposure.
It is notable that most of the studies contributing to this review were from USA and from younger non-professional players. Efforts should be made to collect acceleration measurements from professional players today and to compare these data with corresponding data from non-professionals. There are no data from play prior to around 2000, and it is possible that differences in play from these earlier times, for example the ball may have been in the air more because of the generally poorer state of playing pitches, may have affected exposures of players in the 1960s and 70s who may be those at risk of developing chronic neurological disease now. It is often anecdotally reported that the older style leather balls were more uncomfortable to head. However, it is interesting that the specification for ball size, weight and inflation pressure have remained more or less unchanged since the 19th Century, although the older leather balls were reportedly more prone to absorb water and consequently could become heavier through use. Shewchenko and colleagues [33] showed that older wet balls could increase in mass by between 3 and 47%, although the relative change in head linear acceleration in their tests was less than 20%. Given this relatively small effect we do not considerate it appropriate to attempt to adjust the head impact exposure assessment for differences in ball weight in retrospective epidemiological studies.
Women appear, on average, to have higher PLA from each head impact during play but they experience fewer impacts per hour of play than men, and so their cumulative exposures during a playing career are much lower. This has been highlighted in a number of publications from experimental investigations [37,46] and in previous reviews [67], but not in all such studies [40]. Experimental studies have demonstrated female soccer players have significantly poorer neck strength compared to male players during heading [37,55]. Other studies have confirmed that female neck muscle strength is substantially weaker than corresponding males [68]. Additionally, on average women have lower head mass [69,70], which would result in proportionately higher acceleration from the same impact force. Caccese et al. [47] demonstrated in a controlled experimental study that both estimated head mass and neck strength were significantly associated with PLA in heading; on average, PLA increased by about 50% from around 3 kg to 7 kg head mass. It seems likely that the difference in head acceleration experienced by females and males results from sex-specific differences in neck muscle strength and to a lesser extent differences in head mass.
Impact to the head may result in a range of traumatic physical and biochemical changes, including damage to the blood-brain barrier, abnormal neurometabolism, neuroinflammation along with aggregation and deposition of tau protein in the brain [71]. Some researchers have suggested that because it takes a finite amount of time for the brain to recover from a mTBI, repeated head impacts within the recovery time may have a disproportionate effect on cumulative injury. For example, in an experimental study in adult male rats given two traumatic head impacts, separated by either 24 h or 3 days [72], when the second mTBI was given during the first injury cerebral glucose metabolism recovery (CMRg) period (24 h) it prolonged the CMRg dysfunction and animal behavioural impairments compared to the longer time interval. It may take up to a week or more for symptoms to resolve following a concussion [73]. Merchant-Borna et al. [74] developed a series of exposure metrics for an epidemiological study of American Football players based on a weighting of PLA and other measures of head impact by the inverse of the time between hits and/or the time interval from hit to post-season health assessment. However, these assessments required detailed measurement of the frequency and intensity of impacts that were collected prospectively using helmet-mounted accelerometers. For the purposes of retrospective exposure assessment for studies of professional soccer players, which will inevitably rely on self-reported information on playing, there will likely be insufficient data on head impact frequency to develop this type of exposure metric.
It is also not clear how RSHIs could be linked to the biological changes in the brain following impact or long-term risk of disease, and so it is premature to try to develop an exposure metric that reflects the biological harm. However, given the nature of the potential injury, some form of lifetime cumulative exposure metric, as has been used in other sports involving repetitive head impacts [75], seems appropriate. Given the close relationship between linear and angular acceleration in soccer play and the relatively narrow range of accelerations experienced during play and training, we propose that the lifetime number of impacts would be appropriate. Data on the number of head-to-head collisions and the number of other blows to the head other than head-to-head collisions (i.e., elbow, kick and ball strikes or collision with goalpost and/or the ground) should also be collected and ideally these should be combined with the number of headers, weighted for the relative difference in PLA for these events.
There is evidence suggesting that playing position may influence the number of times an individual heads the ball, with perhaps midfield players and defenders being more likely to head the ball and goal keepers least likely to head the ball; although patterns may differ dependent on the league involved. Recent data from the English Football Association confirmed that defenders headed the ball on average 7.5 times per 90 min which was almost twice the rate of other players (average 3.6 to 4.5 per game) [76]. The rate was highest for the English Football League (League 1, 2 and the Championship) at 9 to 10 per 90 min for Defenders and lowest for younger defenders (Premier League under 23 and under 18 s) at 4 to 6 per game. Results from studies from other European leagues further support the importance of playing position as a determinant of the frequency of heading during professional or semi-professional level of play [77,78]. However, this has also been suggested to depend on age and/or level of play [79]. Despite the above, from our review the average acceleration does not appear to vary greatly by type of header and less so by position of play. While there is data in the literature that could be used to estimate the number of head impacts by playing position or era of play, we consider the best approach would be to collect such data for different periods of play and training by interview with individuals enrolled in an epidemiological study. This is important to account for variations sourcing from differences in team systems and personal style of play. Since self-reported data can be subject to potential recall bias [80], studies should include some form of validation of the former player’s recall of their heading during play would also be needed. This could likely be achieved by comparisons with historical video footage and archives of whole match sections, rather the video highlights.
There has been much discussion about the potential risks of young people heading soccer balls, and young people’s developing brains may be particularly vulnerable to repeated sub-concussive impacts [81]. Although the scientific evidence is still unclear about potential risks, some soccer authorities have decided to introduce restrictions on purposeful heading for younger players, and for example in 2020 the English Football Association required that children under 11 years should not have training in heading and heading drills should be reduced as far as possible for all players under the age of 18 years [82]. Guidance for training in heading among adult professional and amateur players have also been produced [76,82]. On average, younger children appear to have lower PLA than older youths or adults, and they generally head the ball less frequently than older players [67]. However, it is unclear what contribution heading during youth may have on the developing brain and we recommend that in epidemiological studies the contribution of repeated head impacts be examined separately for childhood and adulthood to investigate whether there is differential susceptibility to trauma.
Retrospective exposure assessment for epidemiological studies is problematic in most situations because of lack of historic data. In studying chronic neurological disease in soccer players, it is made particularly difficult because the biological mechanisms underpinning an association between mild traumatic head impacts from heading soccer balls are unclear and so the most appropriate exposure metric is uncertain. Additionally, there are no data in relation to acceleration for professional players. However, the evidence suggests that the range of head acceleration during playing soccer is generally quite small and does not vary much between playing positions. We have concluded, because of a lack of evidence to the contrary, that the best approach is to rely on estimates of the cumulative number of heading impacts over a playing career as the main exposure metric in epidemiological studies of professional players.

5. Conclusions

Information about head acceleration experienced by soccer players is available from experimental and observational studies, but the latter are more informative of acceleration during actual play. There is a close association between linear and angular acceleration from the observational studies and for the purposes of informing exposure assessment in epidemiological studies it is sufficient to consider just one of the two measures. For the purpose of our review we selected peak linear acceleration (PLA) but we need to acknowledge that the relationship between the two measures may be much more complicated that a simple linear relationship. Most of the available data are from the USA and from younger non-professional players. There are substantial differences in the data depending on measurement techniques and for this reason the available data are not particularly informative; standardisation of methodology is important for future studies. However, PLA experienced by female players is on average higher than for male players and young people generally experience lower PLA than adults. The range of PLA measured in soccer play and training is relatively small compared to the differences in other types of occupational exposures, for example chemicals of dusts. Clearly, it would be helpful if more informative studies were carried out in order to allow the relevant exposure metric to be determined. These include mechanistic studies and studies of adult professional association football players. However, to estimate the head impact exposure of professional soccer players in epidemiological studies, based largely on a lack of evidence to the contrary, it is recommended to use the cumulative number of heading impacts over a playing career.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19095488/s1, Table S1: Criteria for evaluating study quality and risk of bias in the reviewed studies, Table S2: Detailed information for observational studies reporting peak linear and rotational accelerations due to heading and other head impacts, Table S3: Detailed information for experimental studies reporting peak linear and rotational accelerations due to heading and other head impacts, Table S4: Results of the quality evaluation of the included studies.

Author Contributions

J.W.C., D.M.M., N.P. and V.G. conceived the review and with I.B. developed the detailed plans for the work. I.B. carried out the data extraction and initial evaluation of the literature. Statistical analysis was carried out by D.M.M. All authors contributed to the study design and interpretation of the findings. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Drake Foundation as part of the HEADING study being carried out at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in collaboration with Queen Mary University of London and the Institute of Occupational Medicine in Edinburgh. Grant number IOM/EMPSZO61. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in this review are contained in the Supplementary Tables.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hanlon, E.M.; Bir, C.A. Real-Time Head Acceleration Measurement in Girls’ Youth Soccer. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2012, 44, 1102–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. McCuen, E.; Svaldi, D.; Breedlove, K.; Kraz, N.; Cummiskey, B.; Breedlove, E.L.; Traver, J.; Desmond, K.F.; Hannemann, R.E.; Zanath, E.; et al. Collegiate women’s soccer players suffer greater cumulative head impacts than their high school counterparts. J. Biomech. 2015, 48, 3720–3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Caccese, J.B.; Lamond, L.C.; Buckley, T.A.; Kaminski, T.W. Reducing purposeful headers from goal kicks and punts may reduce cumulative exposure to head acceleration. Res. Sports Med. 2016, 24, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chrisman, S.P.D.; Mac Donald, C.L.; Friedman, S.; Andre, J.; Rowhani-Rahbar, A.; Drescher, S.; Stein, E.; Holm, M.; Evans, N.; Poliakov, A.V.; et al. Head Impact Exposure During a Weekend Youth Soccer Tournament. J. Child Neurol. 2016, 31, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lynall, R.C.; Clark, M.D.; Grand, E.E.; Stucker, J.C.; Littleton, A.C.; Aguilar, A.J.; Petschauer, M.A.; Teel, E.F.; Mihalik, J.P. Head Impact Biomechanics in Women’s College Soccer. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016, 48, 1772–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Press, J.N.; Rowson, S. Quantifying Head Impact Exposure in Collegiate Women’s Soccer. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2017, 27, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Reynolds, B.; Patrie, J.; Henry, E.J.; Goodkin, H.; Broshek, D.K.; Wintermark, M.; Druzgal, J. Effects of Sex and Event Type on Head Impact in Collegiate Soccer. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2017, 5, 2325967117701708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reynolds, B.; Patrie, J.; Henry, E.J.; Goodkin, H.; Broshek, D.K.; Wintermark, M.; Druzgal, J. Comparative Analysis of Head Impact in Contact and Collision Sports. J. Neurotrauma 2017, 34, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bari, S.; Svaldi, D.O.; Jang, I.; Shenk, T.E.; Poole, V.N.; Lee, T.; Dydak, U.; Rispoli, J.V.; Nauman, E.A.; Talavage, T.M. Dependence on subconcussive impacts of brain metabolism in collision sport athletes: An MR spectroscopic study. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018, 13, 735–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lamond, L.C.; Caccese, J.; Buckley, T.A.; Glutting, J.; Kaminski, T.W. Linear Acceleration in Direct Head Contact Across Impact Type, Player Position, and Playing Scenario in Collegiate Women’s Soccer Players. J. Athl. Train. 2018, 53, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Nevins, D.; Hildenbrand, K.; Kensrud, J.; Vasavada, A.; Smith, L. Laboratory and field evaluation of a small form factor head impact sensor in un-helmeted play. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part P J. Sports Eng. Technol. 2017, 232, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Caccese, J.B.; Best, C.; Lamond, L.C.; Difabio, M.; Kaminski, T.W.; Watson, D.; Getchell, N.; Buckley, T.A. Effects of Repetitive Head Impacts on a Concussion Assessment Battery. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2019, 51, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chrisman, S.P.D.; Ebel, B.E.; Stein, E.; Lowry, S.; Rivara, F.P. Head Impact Exposure in Youth Soccer and Variation by Age and Sex. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2019, 29, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Harriss, A.; Johnson, A.M.; Walton, D.M.; Dickey, J.P. Head impact magnitudes that occur from purposeful soccer heading depend on the game scenario and head impact location. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pr. 2019, 40, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Miller, L.E.; Pinkerton, E.K.; Fabian, K.C.; Wu, L.C.; Espeland, M.A.; Lamond, L.C.; Miles, C.M.; Camarillo, D.B.; Stitzel, J.D.; Urban, J.E. Characterizing head impact exposure in youth female soccer with a custom-instrumented mouthpiece. Res. Sports Med. 2020, 28, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Myer, G.D.; Foss, K.B.; Thomas, S.; Galloway, R.; DiCesare, C.; Dudley, J.; Gadd, B.; Leach, J.; Smith, D.; Gubanich, P.; et al. Altered brain microstructure in association with repetitive subconcussive head impacts and the potential protective effect of jugular vein compression: A longitudinal study of female soccer athletes. Br. J. Sports Med. 2019, 53, 1539–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rich, A.M.; Filben, T.M.; Miller, L.E.; Tomblin, B.T.; Van Gorkom, A.R.; Hurst, M.A.; Barnard, R.T.; Kohn, D.S.; Urban, J.E.; Stitzel, J.D. Development, Validation and Pilot Field Deployment of a Custom Mouthpiece for Head Impact Measurement. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2019, 47, 2109–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sandmo, S.B.; McIntosh, A.S.; Andersen, T.E.; Koerte, I.K.; Bahr, R. Evaluation of an In-Ear Sensor for Quantifying Head Impacts in Youth Soccer. Am. J. Sports Med. 2019, 47, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mihalik, J.P.; Amalfe, S.A.; Roby, P.R.; Ford, C.B.; Lynall, R.C.; Riegler, K.E.; Teel, E.F.; Wasserman, E.B.; Putukian, M. Sex and Sport Differences in College Lacrosse and Soccer Head Impact Biomechanics. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2020, 52, 2349–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Patton, D.A.; Huber, C.M.; McDonald, C.; Margulies, S.S.; Master, C.L.; Arbogast, K.B. Video Confirmation of Head Impact Sensor Data from High School Soccer Players. Am. J. Sports Med. 2020, 48, 1246–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saunders, T.D.; Le, R.K.; Breedlove, K.M.; Bradney, D.A.; Bowman, T.G. Sex differences in mechanisms of head impacts in collegiate soccer athletes. Clin. Biomech. 2020, 74, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Filben, T.M.; Pritchard, N.S.; Hanes-Romano, K.E.; Miller, L.E.; Miles, C.M.; Urban, J.E.; Stitzel, J.D. Comparison of women’s collegiate soccer header kinematics by play state, intent, and outcome. J. Biomech. 2021, 126, 110619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nelson, K.M.; Daidone, E.H.; Breedlove, K.M.; Bradney, D.A.; Bowman, T.G. Head Impact Characteristics Based on Player Position in Collegiate Soccer Athletes. Int. J. Athl. Ther. Train. 2021, 26, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nevins, D.; Hildenbrand, K.; Vasavada, A.; Kensrud, J.; Smith, L. In-Game Head Impact Exposure of Male and Female High School Soccer Players. Athl. Train. Sports Health Care 2019, 11, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Patton, D.A.; Huber, C.M.; Margulies, S.S.; Master, C.L.; Arbogast, K.B. Non-header impact exposure and kinematics of male youth soccer players. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 2021, 57, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tomblin, B.T.; Pritchard, N.S.; Filben, T.M.; Miller, L.E.; Miles, C.M.; Urban, J.E.; Stitzel, J.D. Characterization of On-Field Head Impact Exposure in Youth Soccer. J. Appl. Biomech. 2021, 37, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Naunheim, R.S.; Standeven, J.; Richter, C.; Lewis, L.M. Comparison of Impact Data in Hockey, Football, and Soccer. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 2000, 48, 938–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lewis, L.M.; Naunheim, R.; Standeven, J.; Lauryssen, C.; Richter, C.; Jeffords, B. Do Football Helmets Reduce Acceleration of Impact in Blunt Head Injuries? Acad. Emerg. Med. 2001, 8, 604–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Bayly, P.; Naunheim, R.; Standeven, J.; Neubauer, J.; Lewis, L.; Genin, G. Linear and angular accelerations of the human head during heading of a soccer ball. In Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society, Houston, TX, USA, 23–26 October 2002; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  30. Reed, W.F.; Feldman, K.W.; Weiss, A.H.; Tencer, A.F. Does soccer ball heading cause retinal bleeding? Arch. Pediatrics Adolesc. Med. 2002, 156, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Withnall, C.; Shewchenko, N.; Wonnacott, M.; Dvorak, J.; Delaney, J.S. Effectiveness of headgear in football. Br. J. Sports Med. 2005, 39, i40–i48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Naunheim, R.S.; Bayly, P.; Standeven, J.; Neubauer, J.S.; Lewis, L.M.; Genin, G.M. Linear and Angular Head Accelerations during Heading of a Soccer Ball. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1406–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shewchenko, N.; Withnall, C.; Keown, M.; Gittens, R.; Dvorak, J. Heading in football. Part 3: Effect of ball properties on head response. Br. J. Sports Med. 2005, 39, i33–i39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Shewchenko, N.; Withnall, C.; Keown, M.; Gittens, R.; Dvorak, J. Heading in football. Part 2: Biomechanics of ball heading and head response. Br. J. Sports Med. 2005, 39, i26–i32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Withnall, C.; Shewchenko, N.; Gittens, R.; Dvorak, J. Biomechanical investigation of head impacts in football. Br. J. Sports Med. 2005, 39, i49–i57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Self, B.P.; Beck, J.; Schill, D.; Eames, C.; Knox, T.; Plaga, J. Head Accelerations During Soccer Heading. In The Engineering of Sport 6; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tierney, R.T.; Higgins, M.; Caswell, S.V.; Brady, J.; McHardy, K.; Driban, J.; Darvish, K. Sex Differences in Head Acceleration During Heading While Wearing Soccer Headgear. J. Athl. Train. 2008, 43, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Higgins, M.J.; Tierney, R.T.; Caswell, S.; Driban, J.; Mansell, J.; Clegg, S. An in-vivo model of functional head impact testing in non-helmeted athletes. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part P J. Sports Eng. Technol. 2009, 223, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Paris, A.J.; Antonini, K.R.; Brock, J.M. Accelerations of the Head During Soccer Ball Heading. In Proceedings of the ASME 2010 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B.; ASMEDC, Naples, FL, USA, 16–19 June 2010; pp. 815–816. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dezman, Z.D.; Ledet, E.H.; Kerr, H.A. Neck Strength Imbalance Correlates With Increased Head Acceleration in Soccer Heading. Sports Health A Multidiscip. Approach 2013, 5, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Gutierrez, G.; Conte, C.; Lightbourne, K. The Relationship between Impact Force, Neck Strength, and Neurocognitive Performance in Soccer Heading in Adolescent Females. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2014, 26, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dorminy, M.; Hoogeveen, A.; Tierney, R.T.; Higgins, M.; McDevitt, J.K.; Kretzschmar, J. Effect of soccer heading ball speed on S100B, sideline concussion assessments and head impact kinematics. Brain Inj. 2015, 29, 1158–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Narimatsu, K.; Takeda, T.; Nakajima, K.; Konno, M.; Ozawa, T.; Ishigami, K. Effect of clenching with a mouthguard on head acceleration during heading of a soccer ball. Gen. Dent. 2015, 63, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kawata, K.; Tierney, R.; Phillips, J.; Jeka, J.J. Effect of Repetitive Sub-concussive Head Impacts on Ocular Near Point of Convergence. Laryngo Rhino Otol. 2016, 37, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wu, L.C.; Nangia, V.; Bui, K.; Hammoor, B.; Kurt, M.; Hernandez, F.; Kuo, C.; Camarillo, D.B. In Vivo Evaluation of Wearable Head Impact Sensors. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2016, 44, 1234–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Caccese, J.; Buckley, T.A.; Tierney, R.T.; Rose, W.C.; Glutting, J.J.; Kaminski, T.W. Sex and age differences in head acceleration during purposeful soccer heading. Res. Sports Med. 2018, 26, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Caccese, J.B.; Buckley, T.A.; Tierney, R.T.; Arbogast, K.B.; Rose, W.C.; Glutting, J.J.; Kaminski, T.W. Head and neck size and neck strength predict linear and rotational acceleration during purposeful soccer heading. Sports Biomech. 2017, 17, 462–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hwang, S.; Ma, L.; Kawata, K.; Tierney, R.; Jeka, J. Vestibular Dysfunction after Subconcussive Head Impact. J. Neurotrauma 2017, 34, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kuo, C.; Wu, L.; Loza, J.; Senif, D.; Anderson, S.C.; Camarillo, D.B. Comparison of video-based and sensor-based head impact exposure. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kuo, C.; Sganga, J.; Fanton, M.; Camarillo, D.B. Head Impact Kinematics Estimation With Network of Inertial Measurement Units. J. Biomech. Eng. 2018, 140, 091006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nowak, M.K.; Bevilacqua, Z.W.; Ejima, K.; Huibregtse, M.E.; Chen, Z.; Mickleborough, T.D.; Newman, S.D.; Kawata, K. Neuro-Ophthalmologic Response to Repetitive Subconcussive Head Impacts: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020, 138, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Smirl, J.D.; Peacock, D.; Wright, A.D.; Bouliane, K.J.; Dierijck, J.; Burma, J.S.; Kennefick, M.; Wallace, C.; Van Donkelaar, P. An Acute Bout of Soccer Heading Subtly Alters Neurovascular Coupling Metrics. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Peek, K.; McKay, M.; Fu, A.; Meyer, T.; Oxenham, V.; Esopenko, C.; Caccese, J.; Andersen, J. The effect of ball characteristics on head acceleration during purposeful heading in male and female youth football players. Sci. Med. Footb. 2021, 5, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wahlquist, V.; Kaminski, T. Analysis of Head Impact Biomechanics in Youth Female Soccer Players Following the Get aHEAD Safely in Soccer™ Heading Intervention. Sensors 2021, 21, 3859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Müller, C.; Zentgraf, K. Neck and Trunk Strength Training to Mitigate Head Acceleration in Youth Soccer Players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2020, 35, S81–S89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Austin, K.; Lee, B.J.; Flood, T.R.; Toombs, J.; Borisova, M.; Lauder, M.; Heslegrave, A.; Zetterberg, H.; Smith, N.A. Serum neurofilament light concentration does not increase following exposure to low velocity football heading. Sci. Med. Footb. 2021, 5, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liberi, V. The Determination of Linear Head Acceleration and Risk of Injury in Soccer Heading. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  58. Peek, K.; Andersen, J.; McKay, M.J.; Versteegh, T.; Gilchrist, I.A.; Meyer, T.; Gardner, A. The Effect of the FIFA 11 + with Added Neck Exercises on Maximal Isometric Neck Strength and Peak Head Impact Magnitude During Heading: A Pilot Study. Sports Med. 2021, 52, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Miller, L.E.; Urban, J.E.; Whelan, V.M.; Baxter, W.W.; Tatter, S.B.; Stitzel, J.D. An envelope of linear and rotational head motion during everyday activities. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2019, 19, 1003–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shewchenko, N.; Withnall, C.; Keown, M.; Gittens, R.; Dvorak, J. Heading in football. Part 1: Development of biomechanical methods to investigate head response. Br. J. Sports Med. 2005, 39, i10–i25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Filben, T.M.; Pritchard, N.S.; Miller, L.E.; Miles, C.M.; Urban, J.E.; Stitzel, J.D. Header biomechanics in youth and collegiate female soccer. J. Biomech. 2021, 128, 110782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Davenport, E.M.; Whitlow, C.T.; Urban, J.E.; Espeland, M.A.; Jung, Y.; Rosenbaum, D.A.; Gioia, G.A.; Powers, A.K.; Stitzel, J.D.; Maldjian, J. Abnormal White Matter Integrity Related to Head Impact Exposure in a Season of High School Varsity Football. J. Neurotrauma 2014, 31, 1617–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Miller, L.E.; Urban, J.E.; Davenport, E.M.; Powers, A.K.; Whitlow, C.T.; Maldjian, J.A.; Stitzel, J.D. Brain Strain: Computational Model-Based Metrics for Head Impact Exposure and Injury Correlation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 49, 1083–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hanlon, E.; Bir, C. Validation of a Wireless Head Acceleration Measurement System for Use in Soccer Play. J. Appl. Biomech. 2010, 26, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kromhout, H.; Symanski, E.; Rappaport, S.M. A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 1993, 37, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Brennan, J.H.; Mitra, B.; Synnot, A.; McKenzie, J.; Willmott, C.; McIntosh, A.S.; Maller, J.; Rosenfeld, J.V. Accelerometers for the Assessment of Concussion in Male Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2016, 47, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wahlquist, V.E.; Kaminski, T.W. Purposeful Heading in Youth Soccer: A Review. Sports Med. 2021, 51, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Vasavada, A.N.; Danaraj, J.; Siegmund, G.P. Head and neck anthropometry, vertebral geometry and neck strength in height-matched men and women. J. Biomech. 2008, 41, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yoganandan, N.; Pintar, F.A.; Zhang, J.; Baisden, J.L. Physical properties of the human head: Mass, center of gravity and moment of inertia. J. Biomech. 2009, 42, 1177–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Albery, C.; Whitestone, J. Comparison of Cadaveric Human Head Mass Properties: Mechanical Measurement vs. Calculation from Medical Imaging. In Proceedings of the 31st International Workshop Injury Biomechanics Research, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, USA, 10 November 2002; pp. 157–171. [Google Scholar]
  71. Hunter, L.E.; Branch, C.A.; Lipton, M.L. The neurobiological effects of repetitive head impacts in collision sports. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019, 123, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Greco, T.; Ferguson, L.; Giza, C.; Prins, M. Mechanisms underlying vulnerabilities after repeat mild traumatic brain injuries. Exp. Neurol. 2019, 317, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hänni, S.; Vedung, F.; Tegner, Y.; Marklund, N.; Johansson, J. Soccer-Related Concussions Among Swedish Elite Soccer Players: A Descriptive Study of 1030 Players. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 510800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Merchant-Borna, K.; Asselin, P.; Narayan, D.; Abar, B.; Jones, C.M.C.; Bazarian, J.J. Novel Method of Weighting Cumulative Helmet Impacts Improves Correlation with Brain White Matter Changes After One Football Season of Sub-concussive Head Blows. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2016, 44, 3679–3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Montenigro, P.; Alosco, M.L.; Martin, B.M.; Daneshvar, D.; Mez, J.; Chaisson, C.E.; Nowinski, C.J.; Au, R.; McKee, A.C.; Cantu, R.C.; et al. Cumulative Head Impact Exposure Predicts Later-Life Depression, Apathy, Executive Dysfunction, and Cognitive Impairment in Former High School and College Football Players. J. Neurotrauma 2017, 34, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. The FA. Professional Football Heading in Training Guidance; The FA: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  77. Cassoudesalle, H.; Bildet, M.; Petit, H.; Dehail, P. Head impacts in semiprofessional male Soccer players: A prospective video analysis over one season of competitive games. Brain Inj. 2020, 34, 1685–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Beaudouin, F.; Demmerle, D.; Fuhr, C.; Tröß, T.; Meyer, T. Head Impact Situations in Professional Football (Soccer). Sports Med. Int. Open 2021, 5, E37–E44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Harriss, A.; Johnson, A.M.; Walton, D.M.; Dickey, J.P. The number of purposeful headers female youth soccer players experience during games depends on player age but not player position. Sci. Med. Footb. 2019, 3, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stull, D.; Leidy, N.K.; Parasuraman, B.; Chassany, O. Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: Challenges and potential solutions. Curr. Med Res. Opin. 2009, 25, 929–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mayer, A.R.; Kaushal, M.; Dodd, A.B.; Hanlon, F.M.; Shaff, N.A.; Mannix, R.; Master, C.L.; Leddy, J.J.; Stephenson, D.; Wertz, C.J.; et al. Advanced biomarkers of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: Progress and perils. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018, 94, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. The FA. Heading Guidance; The FA: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 19 05488 g001 550
Figure 1. The literature search and review process.
Figure 1. The literature search and review process.
Ijerph 19 05488 g001
Ijerph 19 05488 g002 550
Figure 2. Scatter plot of mean peak linear and angular acceleration, by experimental (squares and diamonds) and observational (cross and plus) studies. Symbol area reflects the number of measurements associated with the mean.
Figure 2. Scatter plot of mean peak linear and angular acceleration, by experimental (squares and diamonds) and observational (cross and plus) studies. Symbol area reflects the number of measurements associated with the mean.
Ijerph 19 05488 g002
Ijerph 19 05488 g003 550
Figure 3. Geometric mean PLA by method of data collection for observational studies.
Figure 3. Geometric mean PLA by method of data collection for observational studies.
Ijerph 19 05488 g003
Ijerph 19 05488 g004 550
Figure 4. Number of head impacts per hour for male and female players, categorised by heading and mixed head impacts.
Figure 4. Number of head impacts per hour for male and female players, categorised by heading and mixed head impacts.
Ijerph 19 05488 g004
Ijerph 19 05488 g005 550
Figure 5. Geometric mean PLA for various types of head impact during play, for male and female players.
Figure 5. Geometric mean PLA for various types of head impact during play, for male and female players.
Ijerph 19 05488 g005
Ijerph 19 05488 g006 550
Figure 6. Geometric mean PLA from observational studies subdivided by age.
Figure 6. Geometric mean PLA from observational studies subdivided by age.
Ijerph 19 05488 g006
Ijerph 19 05488 g007 550
Figure 7. Forest plot of PLA for each observational study by activity or playing position, subdivided by early youth and youth.
Figure 7. Forest plot of PLA for each observational study by activity or playing position, subdivided by early youth and youth.
Ijerph 19 05488 g007
Table
Table 1. Observational studies reporting peak linear and/or rotational accelerations due to heading and other head impacts.
Table 1. Observational studies reporting peak linear and/or rotational accelerations due to heading and other head impacts.
Reference, CountryPopulationSensor LocationScenarioActivity/
Position		Number of
Measurements/
Sport Events *
Hanlon et al., 2012 [1], USA24 FYOH, back of headTrainingH>24 measurements
NH
F
BH
GP
McCuen et al., 2015 [2], USA35 FYOH, behind earGames and Training, (over season)AINot specified
Caccese et al., 2016 [3], USA16 FYOH, custom
headband 		Games (over season)VH (n = 6)≤224 measurements
UH
Chrisman [4] et al., 2016, USA7 FEY, 10 MEYOH, behind earGames over a weekend tournament (3–6 games)AI72 measurements
Lynall et al., 2016 [5], USA22FYOH, behind earGames (over season)AI≤252 measurements
Training (over season)≤858 measurements
Press et al., 2017 [6], USA26 FYOH, behind earGames and Training (over season)H≤916 measurements
Games and Training (over season)NC
Games and Training (over season)HG
Games and Training (over season)BH
Games and Training (over season)UH
Reynolds et al., 2017 [7], USA1 MYOH, behind earGames (over season)AI, Goalkeeper7 measurements
2 MYGames (over season)AI, Defence15 measurements
1 MYGames (over season)AI, Midfield2 measurements
4 MYTraining (over season)AI, Goalkeeper50 measurements
2 MYTraining (over season)AI, Defence93 measurements
4 MYTraining (over season)AI, Midfield32 measurements
2 FYTraining (over season)AI, Goalkeeper42 measurements
2 FYTraining (over season)AI, Midfield36 measurements
3 FYTraining (over season)AI, Forward59 measurements
Reynolds et al., 2017 [8], USA 4 MY Training (over season)AI, Goalkeeper115 practices
6 MYTraining (over season)AI, Defence197 practices
4 MYTraining (over season)AI, Midfield125 practices
1 MYTraining (over season)AI, Forward43 practices
1 MYGames (over season)AI, Goalkeeper2 games
1 MYGames (over season)AI, Forward7 games
3 MYGames (over season)AI, Defence19 games
Bari et al., 2018 [9], USA23 FYOH, behind earGames and training (over 1–2 seasons)AI29
Lamond et al., 2018 [10], USA23 FYOH, custom
headband 		Games and training (over season)PH≤961 measurements
Games and training (over season)CH
Games and training (over season)AH
Games and training (over season)HH
Games and training (over season)UH
Nevins et al., 2018 [11], USA8 MYOH, behind earGames (over season)H56
OH
HG
NC (various)
Caccese et al., 2019 [12], USA23 FYOH, custom
headband		Games (over season)AINot specified
Chrisman et al., 2019 [13], USA25 FEYOH, behind ear Games (over season)AI108
21 MEY81
Harriss et al., 2019 [14], Canada36 FEY OH, custom headbandGames (over season)VH (n = 6)≤720
UH
Miller et al., 2019 [15], USA7 MEYCMGames and training (over season)VH (n = 3)103
GH
OH
Myer et al., 2019 [16], USA11 FYOH, behind earPlay over season
(regular game and training)		AI14 games and 27 practices.
Rich et al., 2019 [17], USA4 FEY CM Training (over season)AI9 practices
Games (over season)5 games
Sandmo et al., 2019 [18], Norway6 MYOH, inside earTraining (over season)H12
NH
Mihalik et al., 2020 [19], USA34 FYOH, behind earGames (over season)AI2 seasons
Training (over season)
41 MYGames (over season)
Training (over season)
Patton et al., 2020 [20], USA23 FYCMGames (over season)AI18 games
49 MY23 games
Saunders et al., 2020 [21], USA16 FYOH, behind earGames (over season)OH417 measurements
BH
HG
C
12MYHH229 measurements
OH
BH
GH
16 FYTraining (over season)HH764 measurements
OH
BH
GH
C
12 MYOH456 measurements
BH
GH
C
Filben et al., 2021 [22], USA15 FYCMPlay over season (regular game and training)CH72 practices and 24 games
PH
AH
Filben et al., 2021 [22], USA6 FYCMPlay over season (regular game and training)H34 practices and 18 games
13 FY54 practices and 20 games
Nelson et al., 2021 [23], USA2 MYOH, behind earPlay over season (regular game and training)AI117 measurements
3 MY283 measurements
5 MY104 measurements
2 MY181 measurements
1 FY79 measurements
3 FY656 measurements
9 FY220 measurements
3 FY226 measurements
Nevins et al., 2019 [24], USA8 MYOH, behind earPlay over season (regular game)H64 measurements
BH
HG
HH
OH
NH (various)
NC
15 FYH135 measurements
BH
HG
OH
NH (various)
NC
Patton et al., 2021 [25], USA18 MYOH, custom headbandPlay over season (regular game)UH60 measurements
OH
F
27 MEYUH81 measurements
OH
F
Tomblin et al., 2021 [26], USA14 FEYCMPlay over season (regular game and training)VH (n = 4)32 practices and 34 games
BH
NH (n = 2)
F (n = 2)
Notes: Population: FEY = female early youth (i.e., ≤14 yrs old); FY = female youth (i.e., 15–21 yrs old); FM = female mixture (i.e., youth and adults); MEY = male early youth (i.e., ≤14 yrs old); MY = Male Youth (i.e., 15–21 yrs old); MM = male mixture. Sensor Location: OH = Outer head; CM = custom mouthpiece. Activity: H = Header; NH = Any non-header impact; F = Player fall; BH = Ball to head; GP = collision with goalpost; VH = Various header types; AI = Any head impact; NC = Type of head contact not clear; BH = Body to head contact; UH = Ball unintentionally hit head; HG = Head hit ground; PH = Passing header; CH = Clearing header; AH = Attacking header; HH = Head to head collision; OH = Other player collided with head; C = Combination of events. * Number of measurements refers to the product of the number of events and individuals monitored during the study. Since not all players participated on every event monitored this number can sometimes be calculated as an approximation (i.e., minimum or maximum value on the basis of the information provided within the study.
Table
Table 2. Experimental studies reporting peak linear and rotational accelerations due to heading and other head impacts.
Table 2. Experimental studies reporting peak linear and rotational accelerations due to heading and other head impacts.
ReferencePopulationMeasurement MethodScenarioNumber of
Measurements
Naunheim et al., 2000 [27], USAUY FHHeading of a regulation size and weight soccer ball kicked from a distance of approximately 30 yards.25
Lewis et al., 2001 [28], USA3 MMCM Heading of a regulation size and weight soccer ball kicked from a distance of approximately 30 yards with and without a helmetNot specified
Bayly et al., 2002 [29], USA4 MAOH, location not specifiedHeading of a standard ball projected from a distance of 3 m using a mechanical soccer ball driver at speeds of 9 m/s and 12 m/s.Not specified
Reed et al., 2002 [30], USA6 MY & 1 FYOH, headbandHeading the ball from standing position. Ball (size 4) lofted to the players with average speed 6.7 m/s from 3 m away by one of the camp′s coaches.Not specified
Withnall et al., 2005 [31], USA 1 MABPHeading of a ball projected from a soccer machine at a speed of 8 m/s from a distance of 5 m back to a target without a helmet and while wearing a helmet5
Naunheim et al., 2003 [32], USA4 MAOH, headbandHeading a standard ball projected at 9 m/s from a distance of 6 m by a mechanical soccer ball driver (Soccer Tutor, Burbank, CA, USA). Driver was mounted 1.2 m from the ground. 12
Heading a standard ball projected at 12 m/s from a distance of 6 m by a mechanical soccer ball driver (Soccer Tutor, Burbank, CA, USA). Driver was mounted 1.2 m from the ground. 12
Shewchenko et al., 2005 [33], Canada7 MMCMHeading a ball projected to the player in speeds of either 6 or 8 m/s towards a target situated at 5.5 m away in a simulated passing scenario. 12
Heading a ball projected to the player in speeds of either 6 or 8 m/s towards a target situated at 2.75 m away in a simulated ball control scenario. 3
Heading a ball projected to the player in speeds of either 6 or 8 m/s as far away as possible from the player in a simulation of a clearing ball scenario11
Shewchenko et al., 2005 [34], Canada3MMCMHeading a ball projected to the player in speeds of either 6 or 8 m/s towards a target situated at 5.5 m away in a simulated passing scenario. Ball was a Fevernova Tri-lance of 444 g and 0.8 bar pressure (this is the baseline/common settings)3
Heading a ball projected to the player in speeds of either 6 or 8 m/s towards a target situated at 5.5 m away in a simulated passing scenario. Ball was a Fevernova Tri-lance of 444 g at a low pressure of 0.6 bar3
Heading a ball projected to the player in speeds of either 6 or 8 m/s towards a target situated at 5.5 m away in a simulated passing scenario. Ball was a Fevernova Tri-lance at a high pressure of 1.1 bar 3
Heading a ball projected to the player in speeds of either 6 or 8 m/s towards a target situated at 5.5 m away in a simulated passing scenario. Ball was a Fevernova Junior 290 of low mass (351 g)3
Heading a ball projected to the player in speeds of either 6 or 8 m/s towards a target situated at 5.5 m away in a simulated passing scenario. Ball was a Fevernova Junior 350 of low mass (299 g)3
Withnall et al., 2005 [35],
Canada		5 MM & DVMElbow to head impact during ball contention (the subject hits the manikin)50
Hand/wrist/forearm to head impact during ball contention (the subject hits the manikin)50
Self et al., 2006 [36], USA10 MYOH,
ear plugs		Heading a ball thrown from 50 m away by a soccer machine back to the direction it came from in a scenario simulating a header after goal kick60
Heading a ball thrown from 50 m away by a soccer machine in a scenario simulating a header after goal kick–i.e., with a redirection of the ball by 90 degrees from inflight path 60
Tierney et al., 2008 [37], USA29 FY CMHeading of a ball projected from a JUGS soccer machine from a distance of 11 m under normal conditions (i.e., no headguard/helmet)116
15 MY Heading of a ball projected from a JUGS soccer machine from a distance of 11 m under normal conditions (i.e., no headguard/helmet60
29 FYHeading of a ball projected from a JUGS soccer machine from a distance of 11 m wearing a Full90 select performance headguard116
15 MYHeading of a ball projected from a JUGS soccer machine from a distance of 11 m wearing a Full90 select performance headguard60
29 FY Heading of a ball projected from a JUGS soccer machine from a distance of 11 m wearing a head blast soccer band116
15 MYHeading of a ball projected from a JUGS soccer machine from a distance of 11 m wearing a head blast soccer band60
Higgins et al., 2009 [38], USA17 BY CMHeading of a ball projected from a JUGS soccer machine with a speed of 25 mph at an angle of 40° from a distance of 11 m (35 ft) to the participant. 170
Paris et al., 2010 [39], USA1 MYBPHeading of a Baden 150 soccer ball, inflated to 55 kPa, thrown to the player by a JUGS Soccer Machine at four different launch speeds (no further data on speeds provided beside than one was 9.6 m/s and another 11.2 m/s). Four different distances form the machine were also applied (no data provided).4–16
Dezman et al., 2013 [40], USA8 MYCHeading of a ball served to the subjects by an investigator from 3 m away mimicking a soccer practice scenario of low ball velocity40
8 FY40
Gutierrez et al., 2014 [41], USA17 FYOH,
headband		Heading towards the front a ball thrown in to the player by a trained soccer player from 30 feet away. This was assumed as a simulated mimicking regular header drills they performed in practice. 51
Heading towards the right a ball thrown in to the player by a trained soccer player from 30 feet away. This was assumed as a simulated mimicking regular header drills they performed in practice.51
Heading towards the left a ball thrown in to the player by a trained soccer player from 30 feet away. This was assumed as a simulated mimicking regular header drills they performed in practice.51
Dorminy et al., 2015 [42], USA10 MY 6 FYCMHeading of a ball projected from a JUGS soccer machine with a speed of 30 mph from a distance of 60 ft to the participant25
Heading of a ball projected from a JUGS soccer machine with a speed of 40 mph from a distance of 90 ft to the participant25
Heading of a ball projected from a JUGS soccer machine with a speed of 50 mph from a distance of 120 ft to the participant25
Narimatsu et al., 2015 [43], Japan11 MYOH, headbandHeading of a ball projected using a JUGS soccer machine (JUGS Sports) from a distance of 9 m55
Kawata et al., 2016 [44], USA8 MY 2 FY OH, base of skullHeading of a ball (size 5, 8 psi inflation) projected using a JUGS soccer machine (JPS Sports, Tualatin, OR, USA) from a distance of 12 m at a speed of 11.2 m/s (which is similar to when soccer players make a long throw-in from the sideline to mid-field).100
Wu et al., 2016 [45], USA1 MA CMHeading a ball projected from a ball launcher (Sports Tutor, Burbank, CA, USA) with a speed of 7 m/s10
OH, behind ear10
OH, elastic skull cap10
Caccese et al., 2017 [46], USA42 MMOH, elastic skull capHeading of a ball projected linearly using a JUGS soccer machine (JUGS, Tualatin, OR, USA) from a distance of approximately 12 m. 504
58 FM696
Caccese et al., 2018 [47], USA42 MM 58 M OH, elastic skull capHeading of a ball projected linearly using a JUGS soccer machine (JUGS, Tualatin, OR, USA) from a distance of approximately 12 m. 833
Hwang et al., 2017 [48], USA8 MA 2 FA OH, back of skull Heading of a ball projected from a JUGs soccer machine from a distance of 12 m at a speed of 11.2 m/s directly back to the machine100
Kuo et al., 2017 [49], USA1 MACMHeading a ball projected from a ball launcher (Sports Tutor, Burbank, CA, USA) with a speed of 7 m/s14
Kuo et al., 2018 [50], USA4 MACMHeading a ball delivered using a ball launcher (Sports Tutor, Burbank, CA, USA) at speeds of up to 7 m/s which were expected to deliver an impact below 10 g35
Sandmo et al., 2019 [18],
Norway		6 MYOH, ear canalHeading exercises including finishing headers, redirectional headers, long direct headers, short direct headers, and headers from in-air duels.431
Nonheading exercises including shoulder-to-shoulder collisions, forceful shooting, redirectional running with maximal intensity, short straight sprinting with maximal intensity, falling abruptly forward on the ground and landing on out-stretched arms, and in-air duels without ball contact (losing the duel).730
Nowak et al., 2020 [51], USA16 MY 20 FYOH, base of skullHeading a ball projected from a distance of 40 ft by a mechanical JUGS with the ball traveling at 25 mph. The scenario simulates a long throw-in from the sideline to the midfield. 10
Smirl et al., 2020 [52], Canada7 MAOH, behind earHeading a ball projected from a distance of 25 m by a mechanical JUGS at a speed of 77.5 ± 3.7 km/h. Scenario was mimicking a heading following a corner kick.40
Peek et al., 2021 [53], Australia61 BYOH, behind earHeading a ball thrown from a distance of 5 m by a trainer. Scenario was mimicking a heading following a thrown in. Ball was an Adidas starlancer size 5 of 432 g and inflated in 5 psi.183
61 BYHeading a ball thrown from a distance of 5 m by a trainer. Scenario was mimicking a heading following a thrown in. Ball was a Heading-Pro size 4 of 255 g and inflated in 5 psi.153
51 BYHeading a ball thrown from a distance of 5 m by a trainer. Scenario was mimicking a heading following a thrown in. Ball was a Deploy size 5 of 430 g and inflated in 5 psi.75
25 BYHeading a ball thrown from a distance of 5 m by a trainer. Scenario was mimicking a heading following a thrown in. Ball was a Kickerball size 5 of 192 g and inflated in 5 psi.183
Wahlquist and Kaminski., 2021 [54], USA12 FEYOH,
headband		Heading a ball projected from a distance of 12.2 m by a mechanical JUGS at a speed 11.2 m/s (25 mph) and a 45-degree angle. 144
Heading a ball projected from a distance of 12.2 m by a mechanical JUGS at a speed 11.2 m/s (25 mph) and a 45-degree angle. Participants received neck and core strengthening exercises.144
Muller and Zentgraf., 2021 [55], Germany15 MYOH,
headband		Heading a ball projected from a ball launcher (Freddie MAX, JofoSport, Czech Republic) with a speed of 9.6 m/s90
Heading a ball projected from a ball launcher (Freddie MAX, JofoSport, Vigantice, Czech Republic) with a speed of 10.8 m/s90
7 FYHeading a ball projected from a ball launcher (Freddie MAX, JofoSport, Czech Republic) with a speed of 9.6 m/s84
Austin et al., 2021 [56], UK12 MACHeading a ball projected from a distance of 4.7 m and 4 m above by a researcher back in 10 consecutive repeats120
Heading a ball projected from a distance of 4.7 m and 4 m above by a researcher back in 20 consecutive repeats240
Heading a ball projected from a distance of 4.7 m and 4 m above by a researcher back in 40 consecutive repeats480
Victor Liberi., 1995 [57], USA16 MYOH,
headband		Heading a dry ball projected by a mechanical leg from a distance of 18.5 m, with a speed of 15.5 m/s and an angle of 32 degrees48
Heading a wet ball projected by a mechanical leg from a distance of 18.5 m, with a speed of 15.5 m/s and an angle of 32 degrees48
Peek et al., 2021 [58], USA31 BEYOH,
behind ear		Heading a ball projected from a distance of ~5 m to the player by a trainer back to the direction of the throw. Participants received FIFA 11+ training155
31 BEYHeading a ball projected from a distance of ~5 m to the player by a trainer back to the direction of the throw. No training received155
21 BEYHeading a ball projected from a distance of ~5 m to the player by a trainer back to the direction of the throw. Participants received FIFA 11+ training and neck and core strengthening exercises105
21 BEYHeading a ball projected from a distance of ~5 m to the player by a trainer back to the direction of the throw. No training received105
Notes: Population: BEY = Both genders Early Youth (i.e., ≤14 yrs old); BY = Both genders Youth (i.e., 15–21 yrs); FEY = female early youth (i.e., ≤14 yrs old); FY = Female Youth (i.e., 15–21 yrs); FA = Female Adults; FM = Female Mixture of ages; MY = Male Youth (i.e., 15–21 yrs); MA = Male Adult; MM = Male Mixture of ages; D = Dummy; UY = Unspecified gender Youth (i.e., 15–21 yrs. Sensor Location: OH = Outer head; CM = custom mouthpiece, BP = bite plate; C = camera (motion capture system); VM = various places on manikin; FH = football helmet.
Table
Table 3. Summary of studies reporting the effects of potential determinants of the acceleration of heading.
Table 3. Summary of studies reporting the effects of potential determinants of the acceleration of heading.
ReferenceYearDesignDeterminantOutcomeEvaluation MethodResults
NameDefinition
Sandmo et al. [18]2019EXPType of headerFinishing, redirectional, direct header long, non-heading duel, direct header short, non-heading eventsPLA/
PRA		Descriptive graphical summaryPLA and PRA values higher in the order: finishing > redirectional > direct header, long > Non heading due l > Direct header short > Non heading events
Caccese et al. [47]2018EXPHead mass (Kg), sternocleidomastoid (S.) strength (Kg), Heading techniqueHead mass was estimated by multiplying body mass by the validated sex-specific head to total body mass percentage
-S. strength was measured with a handheld dynamometer
-Motion movement analysis related to extension and flexion during heading		PLA/
PRA		Linear regressionIncreased head mass associated with decreased PRA. Higher S. strength associated with decreased PLA and PRA levels. No statistically significant difference observed for technique
Caccese et al. [46]2017EXPSex, player age-Sex: male vs. female
-Age: youth (12–14 yrs), high school (15–17 yrs), collegiate (18–24 yrs)		PLA/
PRA		Linear
regression
(MANOVA)		PLA and PRA levels on females were significantly higher than males. No statistically significant difference observed by age group
Dorminy et al. [42] 2015EXPball speed30 mph, 40 mph, 50 mph PLALinear
regression
(MANOVA)		No systematic/significant differences observed
Dezman et al. [40]2013EXPSex, neck strength -Sex: male vs. female
-Neck strength: imbalance defined as the mean flexion strength minus mean
extension strength measured with a spring-type clinical dynamometer		PLA/
PRA
(Angular)		Spearman correlationMean neck strength imbalance was positively correlated (r = 0.5) with PLA and PRA, significant though only for the latter. No statistically significant differences observed between sexes.
Tierney et al. [37]2008EXPSex, head mass (Kg), head-neck segment length (cm), isometric strength (Kg)Male vs. femalePLAANOVA, correlation analysis Women exhibited greater PLA values than men. Head-neck mass and PLA were inversely correlated in scenarios with no helmet.
Self et al. [36] 2006EXPType of headerGoal kick vs. corner kickPLANon specified statistical hypothesis testNo statistically significant difference observed
Withnall et al. [35]2005EXPType of impactElbow-to-head vs. hand/wrist/forearm-to-head impactPLA/
PRA		Descriptive comparisonsDifferences between types of impact were small
Shewchenko et al. [60] 2005EXPType of headerPassing vs. ball control vs. ball clearancePLA/
PRA		Descriptive comparisonsGreater PLA and PRA for the controlling scenario vs. passing and clearing
Shewchenko et al. [33]2005EXPBall characteristicsball mass, pressure, and construction characteristicsPLA/
PRA		Descriptive comparisonsA reduced ball mass and pressure appeared to relate to decreased PLA. An increase in ball pressure seemed to result in higher PLA and PRA.
Patton et al. [20] 2020OBSSexMale vs. femalePLA/
PRA		Descriptive comparisons, t-testsNo significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between females and males.
Miller et al. [15] 2019OBSType of headerKick, another header, throw, ground impact, headers received from a throw, headers from another headerPLA/
PRA		Linear mixed effect regression (random effect: athlete id)Mean PLA and PRA values for kick higher than another header, or throw, and for PLA only for ground impact; headers received from a throw higher PLA to those from another header.
Harriss et al. [14] 2019OBSType of header, Head impact location-Type: pass in air, thrown in, deflection, punt, shot, goal kick, corner
-Location: front, top, side,		HIF (for type of header only), PRALinear mixed effect regression (random effect: athlete and game id)Type of header significant predictor of PRA. PRA: passes had higher values than deflections and thrown ins. Majority of impacts resulting from pass (41%) and throw ins (30%). Impact location significant predictor of PRA with level for top of head higher than frontal and side.
Rich et al. [17]2019OBSEvent typePractice vs. GameHIF, PLA/
PRA		Descriptive comparisonsHIF somewhat higher during practices compared to games. Small to no difference in median values of PLA.
Chrisman et al. [13]2019OBSAge, Sex-Age: 12 vs. 14 yrs
- Sex: male vs. female		HIF (Age)
PLA/
PRA (Sex)		Poisson regression (Age only)
Descriptive comparisons (Wilcoxon rank sum tests)		Age effects were present but significant only for females (p = 0.02). Females sustained statistically significantly higher magnitude head impacts than males (p = 0.04).
Lamond et al. [10]2018OBSPosition, type of header, event type-Position: DF vs. MD vs. FW vs. GK
-Type of header: Clear vs. shot vs. pass vs. head-to-head vs. unintentional deflection
-Event: practice vs. game		HIF, PLA Linear mixed effect regression (random effect: number of impacts)PLA: no difference across positions and events. DFs and MFs experience more impacts per game than FWs and GKs with DFs having the most. Average HIF per player per 10 events was larger in games than practices. Head-to-head impacts and unintentional deflections resulted in higher LA than purposeful headers. LA values for shots and clears were higher than passes.
Nevins et al. [11]2018OBSType of impactHeader vs. other type of impact (i.e., collision with player, collision with ground, player motion)PLA/
PRA		ANOVASignificantly greater PLA and PRA values for headers compared to player motion and false positive effects. PRA values higher for player motion.
Reynolds et al. [7] 2017OBSSex, event type-Sex: male vs.
female
-Event: practice vs. game		HIF, PLA/PLANegative binomial generalized estimate equation (GEE) modelsSignificantly more HI in games than practices. No other systematic/significant differences observed.
Reynolds et al. [8]2017OBSPosition, event type-Position: DF vs. MD vs. FW vs. GK
-Event: practice vs. game		HIF, PLA/
PRA		Descriptive comparisonsAverage HIF per player somewhat higher in games than practices but with no considerable differences in PLA and PRA. HIF during game somewhat higher among DFs compared to GKs and/or FWs. Differences also observed in training: DFs had lower HIF numbers than players in other positions. PLA and PRA were lowest for GKs during games, and highest for GKs, DFs and MDs during practice.
Press et al. [6]2017OBSPosition, event type-Position: DF vs. MD vs. FW vs. GK
-Event: practice vs. game		HIF, PLA/
PRA (event type only)		Descriptive comparisonsAverage HIF greatest for MDs, followed by DFs, FWs, and GKs. PLA and PRA higher in games than practices.
Lynall et al. [5] 2016OBSPosition of play,
event type, game half		-Position: DF vs. MF vs. FW and wide vs. central
-Event: practice vs. game
Game half: 1st vs. 2nd 		HIF (position only), PLA/
PRA 		chi-square testWide and MFs experienced more impacts than middle players and FWs and DFs, respectively. Practices had more impacts with high PLA/PRA than games and the same applied also for the 2nd half vs. the 1st.
Caccese et al. [3]2016OBSType of header-Kick, goal kick, punt, corner kick, throw in, secondary header, bouncePLA/
PRA		Linear mixed effect regression (random effect: number of impacts)Goal kick and punt impacts resulted in higher PLA and PRA than kick impacts–bounce and secondary headers in lower.
Chrisman et al. [4]2016OBSSexMale vs. femaleHIFDescriptive comparisonsOnly 3 out of 7 female players performed headers whereas all 7 male players did so
McCuen et al. [2] 2015OBSAgeHigh school (14–18 yr) vs. collegiate (17–22 yr)HIF, PLA/
PRA		Descriptive comparisons, t-testsHIF somewhat higher among collegiate players compared with high school players. PLA values for impacts during games significantly lower for high school than collegiate players. No difference observed for PRA.
Hanlon and Bir. [1]2012OBSType of header, type of impact-Side headers vs. front and back headers
-Header vs. non-header (i.e., fall, unintentional ball-to-head, collision with player, collision with goalpost)		PLA/
PRA		ANOVAPLA values for side headers higher than back headers. PRA values for side and front headers higher than back headers. |For type of impact, player collisions had the highest PLA values and falls the lowest.
Reed et al. [30]2002OBSEvent typePractice vs. gameHIFDescriptive comparisonsAverage self-reported HIF higher for practices vs. games (adolescence game)
Filben et al. [22]2021OBSplay state, type of header, and outcome -Play state: corner kick, goal kick, free kick, throw-in, drill, live ball
-Type: pass, shot, or clearance
-Outcome: successful vs. unsuccessful header		PLA/
PRA		Linear mixed effect regression (random
effect:
participant)		Headers during corner kicks, goal kicks, free kicks, and live balls had significantly greater PLA, PRA values than headers during drills. Successful headers had higher PLA values than unsuccessful ones.
Filben et al. [61]2021OBSAge/level-Collegiate vs. youthPLA/
PRA		Linear mixed effect regression (random
effect:
participant)		Headers performed by collegiate players had significantly greater mean PLA, PRA values than youth players
Tomblin et al. [26]2021OBSsession type, position of play-Game vs.
practice
-Position of play		PLALinear mixed effect regression (random effect: participant)Practices were associated with higher PLA than games. Position had no effect
Nelson et al. [23]2021OBSSex, position of play, type of play-Male vs. female
-Position: DF vs. MF vs. FW vs. GP
-Type of play: offensive vs. defensive vs. transition		PLA, PRA, HIF ANOVADefenders had highest PLA vs. other positions. Females had higher PLA and PRA values than men. HIF was higher in males and in defenders
Liberi [57]1995EXP Wet ball vs. dry ballPLAANOVAPLA values significantly higher when heading a dry ball
Nevins et al., [24]2019OBSSex, type of impact-Male vs. female
-Type: header vs. other type of impact (i.e., collision with player, collision with ground, collision with head, player motion)		HIF, PLA, PRADescriptive comparisons, chi-square and non-parametric median testsHeaders had the highest PLA and PRA values compared to other types of impacts. Males had significantly higher PLA and PRA median values for all impacts combined than females. Males also experienced higher values of HIF than females.
Patton et al. [25]2021OBSAge, type of impact-Age: 12–14 yrs vs. 14–16 yrs
-Type: Ball to head vs. other type of impacts (i.e., collision with player, collision with ground (fall))		HIF, PLADescriptive comparisons, linear regressionBall to head impacts significantly higher PLA values compared to other impact types. For 12–14 yr olds HIF highest for collision with other players. For 14–16 yr olds, HIF highest for ball to head impacts. Overall HIF per game highest for 14–16 yr olds.
EXP = experimental, OBS = Observational. PLA = Peak linear Acceleration, PRA = Peak rotational acceleration, HIF = Head Impact Frequency, DF = Defense, FW = Forward, MD = Midfield, GK = Goalkeeper. ANOVA = Analysis of the Variance.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Basinas, I.; McElvenny, D.M.; Pearce, N.; Gallo, V.; Cherrie, J.W. A Systematic Review of Head Impacts and Acceleration Associated with Soccer. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095488

AMA Style

Basinas I, McElvenny DM, Pearce N, Gallo V, Cherrie JW. A Systematic Review of Head Impacts and Acceleration Associated with Soccer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(9):5488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095488

Chicago/Turabian Style

Basinas, Ioannis, Damien M. McElvenny, Neil Pearce, Valentina Gallo, and John W. Cherrie. 2022. "A Systematic Review of Head Impacts and Acceleration Associated with Soccer" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 9: 5488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095488

APA Style

Basinas, I., McElvenny, D. M., Pearce, N., Gallo, V., & Cherrie, J. W. (2022). A Systematic Review of Head Impacts and Acceleration Associated with Soccer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095488

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop