1. Introduction
Virtually every nation has experienced growth in its elderly population over recent decades [
1]. According to a report from the United Nations, by 2050 there will be 1.5 billion people aged 65 years old in the world, which is likely to reach one sixth of the total population [
2]. This continuous increase in the ageing population will bring an imbalance within the elderly care industry structure in many countries [
3,
4,
5]. In the coming decades, several countries will face the dilemma of medical resource shortages and rising demand for nursing care for seniors [
6]. As a possible way to deeply develop the elderly care industry, smart elderly care, an innovative ageing care mode based on disruptive internet technology, has received attention from scholars and experts [
7,
8,
9].
Smart elderly care has grown rapidly as it is an effective way to solve the imbalance between the requirement of service and the supply available within the elderly care industry [
8]. It is a service for seniors providing networking based on intelligent technology, which can satisfy the distinctive requirements of elders and bring dignity to seniors to achieve independent living. In the United States and European countries, smart elderly care has been applied in healthcare since 2007 to improve the well-being of elder people [
8]. In China, it has increased breathtakingly since the state council published the guidelines of “Internet+” in 2015. According to the “Smart Ageing Industry White Paper” [
10], the smart elderly care industry in China experienced steady growth from 2017 to 2019, whose market size increased from RMB 22 trillion to RMB 32 trillion.
Studies of smart elderly care in recent years have covered a wide range of research issues. Global scholars undertake their research from various perspectives such as the development history of smart elderly care, innovative service mode, vital technologies to assist senior care, etc. [
11,
12,
13,
14]. First of all, the development process of smart elderly care has been widely discussed. For example, Chopik and Bruggencate et al. [
15,
16] identified “social technology” as the theoretical motivation for applying smart elderly care. Then Meng et al. and Zuo [
8,
17] discussed the definition, opportunities, and challenges of the smart elderly care industry, reaching a consensus that the future of this industry is tremendously bright with the support of national policies. Thus, researchers have discovered several effective and reliable service modes from the perspective of smart elderly care [
18,
19]. For example, Sun and Zhang [
19] proposed an “Internet+” model of smart elderly care service, which incorporates mobile phone Apps, service providers, products/services, the seniors and online platforms as an integrated system. Zhang [
18] established an optimal model for smart ageing by combining the “visual business operation model”, the “intelligent public welfare matching model”, and the “integrated ecological co-construction model”. In addition, many researchers have used distinctive intelligent sensors and data-collection devices embedded in emerging technologies [
3,
7,
20] to identify effective solutions to enhance the efficiency of ageing services and to minimize operational costs. Moreover, authors such as Neuhuettler et al. [
9] have proposed a theoretical framework of service quality in the field of smart elderly care. Xu, Zhang, and Wei [
11] displayed an indicator system to evaluate the service quality of smart community senior care to prompt service standardization and to reduce the differences in service levels among regions.
Although academics have contributed considerable intellectual work in this area, a comprehensive and holistic record of the smart elderly care literature containing both Western and Eastern views is lacking. Due to the distinctive historical and cultural background, political system, basic national conditions, etc., countries have different levels of ageing, which lead to particular problems and distinctive solutions. The Western world started the research on smart elderly care first, and their classic models are of reference value to developing countries. Thus, exploring the intellectual works in developed countries can help researchers to summarize the advanced experience and inspire others to discover their own path of improvement. Furthermore, as one of the biggest developing countries, China has the largest number of seniors in the world [
8]. Many Chinese scholars have explored smart elderly care; however, their achievements have been overlooked because of language difficulties. Thus, it is problematic to accurately summarize global research on smart elderly care by analyzing only the English literature. As we know, the Web of Science (WOS) almost covers the most comprehensive and authoritative scientific literature worldwide [
21], whereas China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) is the largest continuously updated database of Chinese academic literature; the CNKI effectively complements the English language databases and provides a comprehensive picture of the state of research in China. Hence, this study systematically compares the relevant literature on smart elderly care in both Chinese and English databases to present a holistic overview of current studies.
This paper explores the current global trend of smart elderly care by addressing two questions: What are the differences in the focus of research between English databases and Chinese databases? What is the future direction of smart elderly care? The outcome of this research could be useful to academics who intend to continue exploring smart elderly care in the future by presenting a holistic view of smart elderly care research from both English and Chinese databases. It may also inspire practitioners who want to minimize the cost and select a relatively effective service delivery method to enhance the life quality of ageing people via absorbing the advanced experiences from both developed and developing countries.
This article is organized as follows:
Section 2 gives the data sources and research methods of this study,
Section 3 analyzes the English literature, while
Section 4 describes the Chinese literature. The comparations and hotspots investigation is presented in
Section 5.
Section 6 illustrates the future directions. The last section is the conclusion.
2. Literature Review
Smart elderly care (smart/intelligent senior care) was first introduced by Unit Trust UK, and it refers to providing ageing services via adopting information technology and intelligent control technology [
4]. Zuo [
17] emphasized that its core concept is building a technological network for senior care service participants including government, communities, healthcare institutions, doctors and nurses. Thus, the research of smart elderly care incorporates various perspectives from distinctive disciplines such as information engineering, public management, health and medical care, etc.
As smart elderly care can be explored in different academic areas, the literature review displays an extensive and disorganized picture. Firstly, a considerable amount of published literature reviewed the technologies adopted in smart elderly care. For instance, Marques et al. [
22] conducted a review on eHealth technologies for older person’s outdoor spaces rehabilitation. Kong et al. [
23] summarized the application of mHealth technologies for elderly people care in developed countries. Moreover, the utilization of some specific information technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things, are extensively discussed in the field of smart elderly care. For example, Shaikh et al. [
24] presented Extended Reality (XR) technology for elder people to acquire remote consultation with doctors. Tun et al. [
3] provided a systematic review of IoT and wearable technologies adopted in elderly healthcare and presented new research opportunities in the emerging field such as robot technology. Secondly, the review of smart homes for older adults is another main topic. For instance, Sepasgozar et al. [
25] reviewed the application of IoT technologies in the smart home. Zhang et al. [
18] displayed the development process of the smart home for elderly care in China and identified the deficiencies and further efforts to optimize the improvement. Finally, some literature reviews from the perspectives of sociology and ethics are also relevant. For example, Grossi et al. [
26] analyzed the framework of positive technology adopted in elderly care, and discussed the gap between theoretical requirements and system availability. Zhang et al. [
27] identified the major ethical issues when applying smart elderly care, and emphasized the necessity of considering these ethical conflicts.
The existing bibliometric literature therefore mainly analyses certain aspects of smart ageing and does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the overall state of the field. In addition, the source of this literature is an English language database. Therefore, in order to obtain more comprehensive results, we have added Chinese literature to the existing English literature, using the WOS and CNKI databases as sources to systematically discuss research trends in the most important databases on smart ageing.
6. Conclusions
We collected 307 high-quality Chinese academic studies assembled by CNKI and 504 English research articles collected by WOS from 2011–2022 as research objects. We conducted scientometric analysis to identify the basic situation, cooperation networks, hotspots, and research frontiers of smart elderly care, and our conclusions are as follows:
First of all, the time distribution of publications from both CNKI and WOS witnessed a year-on-year increase. Compared with WOS, smart elderly care research in CNKI received less attention, and there were limited publications before 2016. However, after the release of the Action Plan for the Development of Smart Health and Elderly Care Service Industry (2017–2020) in 2016, there was a dramatic rise in publications. In brief, more scholars began to research smart elderly care, which implied the rapid development of this industry.
Second, the disciplinary distribution in CNKI focused on topics related to social science, such as national politics, trading economics, service economics, and administrative management; natural science only took up limited proportions. Nevertheless, the situation in WOS displayed a completely different view, in which the natural science disciplines occupied the major advantages. This phenomenon shows that scholars have explored smart elderly care from all angles and perspectives.
Third, from the studies of authors and institutions, both WOS and CNKI contain papers from research teams that were investigating smart elderly care. For instance, the SUI D and PENG Q teams were committed to exploring the smart elderly care model which can be adapted to Chinese society. In WOS, the ZHANG X and ZHANG Y teams focused on the application of information technology in smart elderly care. Compared to WOS, most of the research institutions in CNKI were business schools, and they were easily affected by district restrictions.
Fourth, only six hotspots were recognized in CNKI, while 11 clusters were identified in WOS. The research themes in CNKI focused on the general description of the current situation of smart elderly care in China, the exploration of the most adapted model, and superficial analysis of information technology application in smart elderly care. In contrast, the research topics in WOS illustrated a relatively holistic and profound perspective. In addition to the research themes mentioned above, they also covered service quality research, ethical issues, and specific analysis of related information technologies to ensure the sustainable and harmonious growth of smart elderly care.
Fifth, there are three major research frontiers: next-generation information technology, home-based smart community elderly care, and the sustainable development of smart elderly care. The improvement of smart elderly care needs the support of next-generation information technology, and it also requires the conversion and upgrading of service models and systems. Finally, no matter how smart elderly care becomes, it must take sustainable growth as its primary premise.