Next Article in Journal
Research on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Management: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Improve COVID-19 CT Image Diagnosis
Previous Article in Journal
“How Do I Exist in This Body…That’s Outside of the Norm?” Trans and Nonbinary Experiences of Conformity, Coping, and Connection in Atypical Anorexia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 2
10.3390/ijerph20021157
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interaction between Geographical Areas and Family Environment of Dietary Habits, Physical Activity, Nutritional Knowledge and Obesity of Adolescents

by
Alessio Pellegrino
1,*,
Samuele Bacci
1,
Francesco Guido
1,
Andrea Zoppi
1,
Loira Toncelli
1,
Laura Stefani
1,
Maria Boddi
1,
Alessandra Modesti
2 and
Pietro Amedeo Modesti
1
1
Sport Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
2
Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1157; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021157
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 3 January 2023 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 9 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Adolescents)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There are marked differences in the regional distribution of childhood obesity in Italy. This study sought to investigate the interaction between geographical areas and family environment of dietary habits, physical activity, nutritional knowledge and obesity of adolescents. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 426 school-aged children and 298 parents residing in Central Italy (Florence, Tuscany) and Southern Italy (Corigliano, Calabria), in 2021. Survey questionnaire investigated anthropometry, eating behavior, nutritional knowledge and physical activity. BMI was determined and compared with reference percentile charts for adolescents. Multivariate regression analyses showed that: (1) an adolescent’s BMI was directly influenced by their parents’ BMI independently of parental nutritional knowledge and dietary or physical activity habits; (2) parents transmitted eating or physical activity habits to their children; (3) the geographic region of residence is not in itself an independent determinant of children’s BMI. The clear message is that prevention of childhood obesity should consider family-based approaches. Parental obesity can be the point of convergence of the complex interactions between a parent’s and child’s habits and should be one of the most important factors to look for.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, childhood obesity has grown globally and is now a major public health problem [1]. In 2016, over 50 million girls and 70 million boys were obese at a global level [2]. Excess body fat has been attributed to both a high intake of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods and beverages, such as chips, salted snacks, sweets and soft drinks, and a sedentary lifestyle [3]. In Europe, a North–South obesity gradient has been observed. Italy, particularly the Southern region of the country [4], has one of the highest prevalences of childhood overweight and obesity in the European WHO region [5]. Growing evidence indicates that environmental and socio-economic factors play a relevant role among determinants of the childhood obesity epidemic. Parental habits can influence children’s habits early in life [6,7]. Growth from childhood to adolescence is strongly influenced by the interaction between genetic [8], social, nutritional and environmental factors, that increasingly come from the world outside the family, and in particular from school and the community [9]. Therefore, the study of the interaction between family or environmental factors and body weight is important to identify determinants [10] and potential intervention targets for childhood obesity [11].
The present study sought to investigate the influence of parental physical activity, dietary habits, obesity level, sociocultural factors and the interaction with the geographic area, on the weight status of children and adolescents in Italy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Study Population

A cross-sectional web-based observational epidemiological study was conducted in 2021 on students of primary or secondary schools and their parents in Florence (Tuscany, located in Central Italy) and in Corigliano (Calabria, Southern Italy). Eligible subjects were residents of the Florence or Corigliano area with no plans to move within the study period. Exclusion criteria included comorbidities that required immediate medical attention, use of medication affecting body weight, diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes or participation in a weight-loss program.

2.2. Ethics

The experimental protocols and the process for obtaining informed consent were approved by the Institutional Review Board (Prot. n. 0084484) in conformity with the principles embodied in the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and with the general data protection regulations. Participation in the study was voluntary. Participants expressed their informed consent prior to filling in the questionnaire.

2.3. Study Procedure

Preliminary informative web meetings were held with school teachers, students and their parents. Participants were then invited to complete an anonymous but coded (to associate children with parents) web-based questionnaire. The questionnaire was composed of 4 main sections investigating (a) demography and anthropometry, (b) diet composition (Mediterranean Diet Score assessment) [12], (c) physical activity levels (International Physical Activity Questionnaire, IPAQ) [13] and nutritional knowledge (the General and Sport Nutrition Knowledge questionnaire, GeSNK) [14].
a. Demography and anthropometry. This section included questions regarding age (years), gender, parent education level (Secondary school, High school, University), weight (kg) and height (cm). Body mass index (BMI) was then calculated. Underweight, normal weight, overweight or obese were coded according to WHO BMI-for-age standard percentiles [15,16] for students or WHO standards [15,17] for parents.
b. Diet composition was investigated using the Mediterranean Diet (MD) score assessment questionnaire [12] as previously reported [18]. Briefly, the weekly consumption of 9 food groups (unrefined cereals such as wholemeal bread, wholemeal pasta, rice, etc.; potatoes; fruit; vegetables; legumes; fish; red meat; white meat; dairy products including cheese, yogurt, milk), as well as olive oil and alcohol intake were investigated. The resulting index of adherence ranged between 0 and 55 points [12].
c. Physical Activity Levels were investigated using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—short form (IPAQ-SF) validated questionnaire [19,20,21]. Briefly, the total volume of leisure time physical activity accumulated over a week, expressed as metabolic equivalents (METs) h/week, was assessed and participants were categorized by compliance to WHO criteria for physical activity as previously reported [18]. Subjects were also classified as: inactive (<700 METs h/wk.); sufficiently active (700–2519 METs h/wk.); active or very active (>2519 METs h/wk.) [22].
d. Nutrition knowledge was investigated using the General and Sport Nutrition Knowledge (GeSNK) validated questionnaire [14]. The GeSNK questionnaire included 62 items divided in 2 different sections (see the questionnaire in the Supplementary Materials). Specifically, the first section (items 1–29) is concerned with general nutrition (GeSNK general nutrition); the second section (items 30–62) is concerned with nutrition and sport (GeSNK nutrition and sport). The majority of the questions could be answered ‘True’, ‘False’ or ‘I don’t know’. Scores were coded as +1 for a correct answer and 0 if participants selected the incorrect answer or the ‘I don’t know’ response. The maximum total score was 97 and the minimum was 0. The knowledge of participants who obtained a score lower than 46 and higher than 58 was labelled as ‘low’ or ‘high’ knowledge, respectively. An intermediate score was considered ‘medium’ [14].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The sample size for group comparison was based on available estimations of overweight/obesity in Tuscany and Calabria [4]. Considering a 5% confidence level (alpha error) and 80% statistical power (beta error), the estimated total sample size was at least 281 individuals for both parents and students. Values were expressed as number and percentage for categorical variables or mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. Group differences were estimated using χ2 tests for categorical variables, or t-tests for continuous variables. Multivariable regression analyses were then conducted to investigate the association between dependent and independent variables (exposures). Variables included age, gender, education level, BMI categories, region of residence, compliance with WHO PA recommendations (Yes or No), METs per week, MD score and nutritional knowledge.
IBM SPSS software (version 28.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Study Population

Overall, 426 students (233 girls, 54.7%) with an average age of 11.6 ± 1.5 years and 298 parents (222 women, 74.5%) aged 44.5 ± 5.8 years, participated in the study. Overweight/obese participants were 139 (32.6%) among students and 118 (39.6%) among parents, with an adequate average MD score in both groups (30.7 ± 4.2 and 31.1 ± 4.3, respectively). Age-specific WHO suggestions for physical activity were respected by only 164 out of 426 students (38.5%) whereas 194 out of 298 parents (65.1%) followed WHO suggestions.
Descriptive characteristics of the students and parents in the two areas of Italy are shown in Table 1. The BMI of the participants was higher in Southern than in Central Italy for both students and parents (p < 0.001 for both). In the Tuscan population, BMI categories showed no gender differences among students, whereas obese parents were more frequently men than women (p < 0.05, data not shown). In Southern Italy, both obese students and obese parents were more frequently men than women (p < 0.05 for both, data not shown). No geographical differences were observed in the adherence to the MD, although the parents’ score was slightly lower in Calabria than in Tuscany. Students moved less in Calabria than in Tuscany, while there were no regional differences as regards the parents. More precisely, compliance with the WHO recommendations among children was 34% in Calabria against 45% in Tuscany (p < 0.025), while compliant parents were 63% and 68%, respectively (ns), with no gender differences. Students showed a lower level of nutritional knowledge at the GeSNK test in Calabria than in Tuscany (Table 1). Conversely, no regional differences were observed among parents (Table 1).

3.2. The Influence of Parents

Overall, in a multivariable linear regression analysis the MD score of students was positively influenced by the dietary habits of their parents, although the influence reduced with students’ age (Table 2). More precisely, students’ consumption frequency of fruit and legumes was positively associated with their parents’ consumption (Table 3).
The consumption of potatoes and legumes by students is also positively influenced by living in Calabria, while the consumption of fruit and fish reduces with age (data not shown).
Likewise, students’ physical activity was positively associated with the physical activity of their parents, independently of the geographical area (Table 4).
The source of the students’ nutritional knowledge was no different between the two regional areas. In particular, both in Tuscany and Calabria parents were reported to be the main source of nutritional knowledge (57.5% and 60.7%, respectively), followed by school teachers (26.8% and 26.7%), the web or the media (21.2% and 23.5%), sports coaches (11.7 and 10.9) and friends (7.3% and 3.6%). The students’ nutritional knowledge was positively influenced by age and regional area (Tuscany) (Table 5).

3.3. Interaction between Geographical Area and Family Environment on BMI of Adolescents

The interaction between geographical area, parental characteristics and students’ BMI was then investigated.
The only parental characteristic identified as an independent determinant of the students’ BMI at multivariable analysis (also adjusted for age, gender, PA category, MD category and GeSNK category of students) was parental BMI category (Table 6).

4. Discussion

These data shed new light on the regional differences of BMI in Italy, showing that (1) there is a direct relationship between the BMI of children and parents that is independent of a geographical area; (2) the eating or physical activity habits of parents are transmitted to their children even if they do not directly affect the BMI of the children; (3) geographical area is not in itself a determinant of the BMI of students.
Diet and physical activity are among the best-known and studied factors that influence a person’s weight. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MD) and physical activity were reported to reduce the risk of developing cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia) and chronic non-communicable diseases from childhood onward [23,24,25]. Family environment is therefore now considered an important target for prevention of childhood obesity, which often tracks into adulthood [26]. Excess body fat has been attributed to both high intake of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods and beverages, such as chips, salted snacks, sweets and soft drinks, and a sedentary lifestyle [27]. The World Health Organization (WHO) indeed recommend associating adherence to the MD with at least 60 min of daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for children and adolescents in order to reduce the risks of obesity [28] and to achieve proper psychomotor development [29]. Unfortunately, the MD appears to be followed less and less by younger generations in most Mediterranean countries [30,31], sedentarism is spreading [32,33] and childhood obesity is on the rise. In Europe, childhood obesity has a North to South gradient [4,5], also observed at a national level in Italy [4]. The search for the determinants of these differences is of great interest for prevention strategies.
Parents’ habits are among the main factors that shape the lifestyle habits of their children, influencing their respect for healthy patterns especially at a developmental age [33]. It has, in fact, been reported that the adherence of parents to the MD favorably conditions the eating behavior and food choices of their children [34,35,36,37,38]. It must be said that other studies showed a moderate or weak association in dietary habits, with remarkably varied results [39]. In the present study, the adherence of parents to the MD favorably affected the students’ MD, although an inverse association was observed with age. This pattern may suggest a deviation from family habits during the transition from childhood to adolescence, a stage characterized by marked shifts in cognitive development and an increased sense of autonomy in decision-making about own eating patterns [37]. Thus, combined with evidence that eating behavior is established early in life, these findings suggest that childhood and adolescence are better stages for establishing healthy dietary habits to prevent obesity [40]. In the present study, the amount of physical activity practiced by children was also affected by parents’ habits, as described in previous studies [33]. Parents can influence children’s physical activity through modelling, providing support for physical activity in the home environment and establishing rules or expectations for physical activity [41].
When considering geographical differences, the prevalence of obesity was found to be higher in Calabria, a Southern Italian region, than in Tuscany, in line with recent data [4]. However, in the multivariate regression analysis, the geographical region was not selected as an independent determinant of student obesity, even though Tuscan children moved more than Calabrian children. In contrast to a previous study in Italy [42], no regional differences in MD habits were found.
Importantly, in the present study adherence to the MD and physical activity do not emerge as determinants of childhood obesity. This observation agrees with a recent systematic review where an inverse association of MD adherence with BMI values or the prevalence of overweight and obesity was observed in only 10/26 papers investigating children and/or adolescents [43]. Exploring the relationship between the MD and overweight/obesity is indeed complex. Cross-sectional design studies do not permit the inference of causal relationships between MD adherence and anthropometric variables. Secondly, BMI is not a clear indicator of abdominal adiposity or fat mass. Finally, self-reported measurement studies could have been influenced by the fact that obese individuals are more likely to under-report their body weight.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the relationship between nutritional knowledge and obesity in adolescents and their parents. Interestingly, there appears to be a discrepancy between the level of nutritional knowledge and obesity in adults and students. More precisely, the lower nutritional knowledge of students in Calabria than in Tuscany was closely associated with a higher degree of obesity. Conversely, regional differences in obesity were independent from nutritional knowledge among adults. Although proper knowledge of nutrition does not necessarily translate into a healthier BMI [44], other cultural descriptors, such as the level of education of parents, could help to better explain these findings. The influence of regional differences on students’ BMI indeed disappears when the education level of parents, the only socioeconomic indicator available in this study, is introduced into the model. At this point the only variable that continues to influence students’ obesity is the phenotype of the parents. If parents are obese, children are more likely to also be obese. In the context of the family environment, socio-cultural aspects were found to play a key role; children from low socioeconomic status were reported to be at the highest risk of obesity [45]. According to Nau et al. [46], social factors mainly operate through physical activity and dietary factors. In Italy, regional differences exist in the availability of sports facilities and of trained personnel for various sports; in the amount of caloric intake; in the level of education of the parents, which was observed to be different in the two populations [47]. The combination of these factors affects the BMI of both children and parents. In conclusion, even though the transmission of virtuous habits appeared to occur from parents to children, parent–child BMI remained the only strong association found. Parental obesity can therefore be the point of convergence of the complex interactions between parents’ and children’s habits and should be one of the most important factors to look for.
This study has several potential limitations. First, this study does not allow for a clear analysis of the role of socio-economic factors. In fact, it was not possible to use the income parameter in a study with these characteristics. The level of education is not a reliable proxy in countries such as Italy where the degree of education is not necessarily associated with income. Second, the participation rate was low although in line with current reports. Third, biases inherent in the use of referred data, such as anthropometry, eating habits and level of physical activity, are possible. Fourth, the use of a convenience sample and the small number of schools examined do not allow us to generalize our results. Studies based on large random samples that are representative of the Italian adolescent population are obviously warranted. Finally, the Mediterranean Diet score investigates the frequency of food consumption by disregarding the total amount of food consumed and excluding other factors that may affect childhood obesity such as snack food and sweetened beverages.

5. Conclusions

Childhood obesity is a crucial issue in modern times and prevention strategies need to be improved. Eating habits and physical activity are among the major determinants of BMI, but the way they act in influencing weight status underlies complex interactions with the family environment and the parents’ cultural pattern.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph20021157/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.A.M.; formal analysis, P.A.M. and A.P.; investigation, S.B., F.G. and A.Z.; data curation, P.A.M. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, P.A.M. and A.P.; writing—review and editing, L.T., L.S., M.B. and A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (Prot. n. 0084484).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all parents and adolescents who participated in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. Implementation Plan: Executive Summary; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; (WHO/NMH/PND/ECHO/17.1). License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259349 (accessed on 11 November 2022).
  2. (NCD-RisC) NRFC. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 2017, 390, 2627–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Nishida, C.; Uauy, R.; Kumanyika, S.; Shetty, P. The joint WHO/FAO expert consultation on diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: Process, product and policy implications. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. OKkio alla SALUTE—The Results 2019. Available online: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/okkioallasalute/indagine-2019-dati (accessed on 11 November 2022).
  5. WHO. Regional Office for Europe. Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI). Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/333900/COSI-protocol-en.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 11 November 2022).
  6. Sahoo, K.; Sahoo, B.; Choudhury, A.K.; Sofi, N.Y.; Kumar, R.; Bhadoria, A.S. Childhood obesity: Causes and consequences. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2015, 4, 187–192. [Google Scholar]
  7. East, P.; Delker, E.; Blanco, E.; Burrows, R.; Lozoff, B.; Gahagan, S. Home and Family Environment Related to Development of Obesity: A 21-Year Longitudinal Study. Child. Obes. 2019, 15, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thaker, V.V. Genetic and Epigenetic Causes of Obesity. Adolesc. Med. State Art Rev. 2017, 28, 379–405. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hruby, A.; Hu, F.B. The Epidemiology of Obesity: A Big Picture. Pharmacoeconomics 2015, 33, 673–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gahagan, S.; Uauy, R.; Roseboom, T.J. Developmental origins of pediatric obesity. Int. J. Pediatr. 2012, 2012, 309863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Nader, P.R.; Huang, T.T.; Gahagan, S.; Kumanyika, S.; Hammond, R.A.; Christoffel, K.K. Next steps in obesity prevention: Altering early life systems to support healthy parents, infants, and toddlers. Child. Obes. 2012, 8, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Panagiotakos, D.B.; Pitsavos, C.; Arvaniti, F.; Stefanadis, C. Adherence to the Mediterranean food pattern predicts the prevalence of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes and obesity, among healthy adults; the accuracy of the MedDietScore. Prev. Med. 2007, 44, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hallal, P.C.; Victora, C.G. Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2004, 36, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Calella, P.; Iacullo, V.M.; Valerio, G. Validation of a General and Sport Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire in Adolescents and Young Adults: GeSNK. Nutrients 2017, 9, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. WHO. BMI-for-Age (5–19 years). Available online: https://www.who.int/tools/growth-reference-data-for-5to19-years/indicators/bmi-for-age (accessed on 11 November 2022).
  16. de Onis, M.; Onyango, A.W.; Borghi, E.; Siyam, A.; Nishida, C.; Siekmann, J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull. World Health Organ. 2007, 85, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. WHO. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ. Tech. Rep. Ser. 2000, 894, 1–253. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosselli, M.; Ermini, E.; Tosi, B.; Boddi, M.; Stefani, L.; Toncelli, L.; Modesti, P.A. Gender differences in barriers to physical activity among adolescents. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30, 1582–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mannocci, A.; Masala, D.; Mei, D.; Tribuzio, A.M.; Villari, P.; La Torre, G. International Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents (IPAQ A): Reliability of an Italian version. Minerva Pediatr. 2018, 73, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)—Short and Long Forms. Available online: https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/scoring-protocol (accessed on 11 November 2022).
  21. Craig, C.L.; Marshall, A.L.; Sjöström, M.; Bauman, A.E.; Booth, M.L.; Ainsworth, B.E.; Pratt, M.; Ekelund, U.; Yngve, A.; Sallis, J.F.; et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1381–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Orlandi, M.; Rosselli, M.; Pellegrino, A.; Boddi, M.; Stefani, L.; Toncelli, L.; Modesti, P.A. Gender differences in the impact on physical activity and lifestyle in Italy during the lockdown, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 2173–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dinu, M.; Pagliai, G.; Casini, A.; Sofi, F. Mediterranean diet and multiple health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sofi, F.; Cesari, F.; Abbate, R.; Gensini, G.F.; Casini, A. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and health status: Meta-analysis. BMJ 2008, 337, a1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Han, J.C.; Lawlor, D.A.; Kimm, S.Y. Childhood obesity. Lancet 2010, 375, 1737–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lobstein, T.; Baur, L.; Uauy, R.; IASO International Obesity TaskForce. Obesity in children and young people: A crisis in public health. Obes. Rev. 2004, 5 (Suppl. 1), 4–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Carlson, J.A.; Crespo, N.C.; Sallis, J.F.; Patterson, R.E.; Elder, J.P. Dietary-related and physical activity-related predictors of obesity in children: A 2-year prospective study. Child. Obes. 2012, 8, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. WHO. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44399/9789241599979_eng.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 11 November 2022).
  29. Pate, R.R.; Pratt, M.; Blair, S.N.; Haskell, W.L.; Macera, C.A.; Bouchard, C.; Buchner, D.; Ettinger, W.; Heath, G.W.; King, A.C.; et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995, 273, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arcila-Agudelo, A.M.; Ferrer-Svoboda, C.; Torres-Fernàndez, T.; Farran-Codina, A. Determinants of Adherence to Healthy Eating Patterns in a Population of Children and Adolescents: Evidence on the Mediterranean Diet in the City of Mataró (Catalonia, Spain). Nutrients 2019, 11, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. García Cabrera, S.; Herrera Fernández, N.; Rodríguez Hernández, C.; Nissensohn, M.; Román-Viñas, B.; Serra-Majem, L. Kidmed Test; Prevalence of Low Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Children and Young; A Systematic Review. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 32, 2390–2399. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gregory, J.W. Prevention of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome in Children. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Brzęk, A.; Strauss, M.; Przybylek, B.; Dworrak, T.; Dworrak, B.; Leischik, R. How does the activity level of the parents influence their children’s activity? The contemporary life in a world ruled by electronic devices. Arch. Med. Sci. 2018, 14, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Scaglioni, S.; De Cosmi, V.; Ciappolino, V.; Parazzini, F.; Brambilla, P.; Agostoni, C. Factors Influencing Children’s Eating Behaviours. Nutrients 2018, 10, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bogl, L.H.; Silventoinen, K.; Hebestreit, A.; Intemann, T.; Williams, G.; Michels, N.; Molnár, D.; Page, A.S.; Pala, V.; Papoutsou, S.; et al. Familial Resemblance in Dietary Intakes of Children, Adolescents, and Parents: Does Dietary Quality Play a Role? Nutrients 2017, 9, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kosti, R.I.; Kanellopoulou, A.; Fragkedaki, E.; Notara, V.; Giannakopoulou, S.P.; Antonogeorgos, G.; Rojas-Gil, A.P.; Kornilaki, E.N.; Lagiou, A.; Panagiotakos, D.B. The Influence of Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet among Children and Their Parents in Relation to Childhood Overweight/Obesity: A Cross-Sectional Study in Greece. Child. Obes. 2020, 16, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reicks, M.; Banna, J.; Cluskey, M.; Gunther, C.; Hongu, N.; Richards, R.; Topham, G.; Wong, S.S. Influence of Parenting Practices on Eating Behaviors of Early Adolescents during Independent Eating Occasions: Implications for Obesity Prevention. Nutrients 2015, 7, 8783–8801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Golan, M. Parents as agents of change in childhood obesity—From research to practice. Int. J. Pediatr. Obes. 2006, 1, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, Y.; Beydoun, M.A.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Moreno, L.A. Do children and their parents eat a similar diet? Resemblance in child and parental dietary intake: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2011, 65, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Birch, L.L.; Ventura, A.K. Preventing childhood obesity: What works? Int. J. Obes. 2009, 33 (Suppl. 1), S74–S81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Trost, S.G.; McDonald, S.; Cohen, A. Measurement of general and specific approaches to physical activity parenting: A systematic review. Child. Obes. 2013, 9 (Suppl. 1), S40–S50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Noale, M.; Nardi, M.; Limongi, F.; Siviero, P.; Caregaro, L.; Crepaldi, G.; Maggi, S. Mediterranean Diet Foundation Study Group. Adolescents in southern regions of Italy adhere to the Mediterranean diet more than those in the northern regions. Nutr. Res. 2014, 34, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Iaccarino Idelson, P.; Scalfi, L.; Valerio, G. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017, 27, 283–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Henriques, A.; Azevedo, A.; Lunet, N.; Moura-Ferreira, P.; do Carmo, I.; Silva, S. Obesity-related knowledge and body mass index: A national survey in Portugal. Eat Weight Disord. 2020, 25, 1437–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shrewsbury, V.; Wardle, J. Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: A systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990–2005. Obesity 2008, 16, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nau, C.; Ellis, H.; Huang, H.; Schwartz, B.S.; Hirsch, A.; Bailey-Davis, L.; Kress, A.M.; Pollak, J.; Glass, T.A. Exploring the forest instead of the trees: An innovative method for defining obesogenic and obesoprotective environments. Health Place 2015, 35, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Nardone, P.; Spinelli, A.; Lauria, L.; Buoncristiano, M.; Bucciarelli, M.; Galeone, D.; Gruppo OKkio alla SALUTE. [Sociodemographic variation in childhood overweight and obesity in Italy in 2014]. Epidemiol. Prev. 2015, 39, 64. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of students and parents according to geographical area of residence.
Table 1. Characteristics of students and parents according to geographical area of residence.
Students Parents
TuscanyCalabriap < *TuscanyCalabriap < *
(n = 179)(n = 247) (n = 113)(n = 185)
Age (years)10.9 ± 1.912.0 ± 1.10.0545.2 ± 6.344.1 ± 5.4ns
Female gender, n (%)101 (56%)132 (53%)ns78 (69%)144 (78%)ns
BMI (kg/m2)18.3 ± 3.320.3 ± 3.80.0523.4 ± 3.125.4 ± 4.10.05
BMI categories, n (%)
Underweight19 (10.6%)4 (1.6%) 10 (8.8%)0 (0.0%)
Normal weight119 (66.5%)145 (58.7%) 74 (65.5%)96 (51.9%)
Overweight22 (12.3%)56 (22.7%) 26 (23.0%)69 (37.3%)
Obese19 (10.6%)42 (17.0%)0.0013 (2.7%)20 (10.8%)0.001
MD score (units)30.8 ± 3.830.7 ± 4.5ns32.5 ± 3.730.3 ± 4.40.05
METs total (METs)3530 ± 31352891 ± 3762ns2258 ± 18492762 ± 2594ns
Physical activity categories, n (%)
Inactive18 (10%)47 (19%) 21 (19%)43 (23%)
Moderate68 (38%)101 (41%) 56 (50%)67 (36%)
Active93 (52%)99 (40%)0.01136 (32%)75 (41%)ns
WHO compliant, n (%)80 (45%)84 (34%)0.02577 (68%)117 (63%)ns
GeSNK score (units) 55 ± 1443 ± 100.0566 ± 1065 ± 6ns
GeSNK categories, n (%)
Low knowledge20 (20%)122 (49%) 0 (0%)0 (0%)
Medium knowledge41 (41%)122 (49%) 11 (28%)27 (15%)
High knowledge38 (38%)3 (1%)0.00129 (73%)154 (85%)ns
* = at Student’s t-test or Chi square test as appropriate. BMI = body mass index; MD = Mediterranean Diet; METs = metabolic equivalents; WHO = World Health Organization; GeSNK = the General and Sport Nutrition Knowledge questionnaire.
Table
Table 2. Determinants of students’ Mediterranean Diet (MD) score at multivariate linear regression *.
Table 2. Determinants of students’ Mediterranean Diet (MD) score at multivariate linear regression *.
ExposuresB(95% CI for B)p
Age−0.37(−0.71 to −0.02)0.036
Sex (women)−0.07(−1.06 to 0.92)0.887
Geographic region (south)0.91(−0.31 to 2.12)0.142
Parent MD Score0.19(0.07 to 0.31)0.002
* dependent variable: students’ MD score, adjusted for variables reported in the Table.
Table
Table 3. Association between the consumption frequency of a specific food by the students and the consumption frequency of the same food by the parents at multivariate linear regressions *.
Table 3. Association between the consumption frequency of a specific food by the students and the consumption frequency of the same food by the parents at multivariate linear regressions *.
ExposuresB(95% CI for B)p
Unrefined cereals0.125(−0.019 to 0.270)0.088
Potatoes0.025(−0.089 to 0.139)0.668
Fruit0.124(0.001 to 0.249)0.050
Vegetables0.111(1.596 to 0.112)0.104
Legumes0.136(0.005 to 0.267)0.041
Fish0.104(−0.020 to 0.228)0.100
Red meat0.026(−0.073 to 0.125)0.610
White meat0.031(−0.074 to 0.136)0.563
Dairy products 0.096(−0.007 to 0.198)0.067
* adjusted for age, gender, BMI category and geographic region of students.
Table
Table 4. Determinants of students’ physical activity at multivariate linear regression *.
Table 4. Determinants of students’ physical activity at multivariate linear regression *.
ExposuresB(95% CI for B)p
Age231.23(−30.14 to 492.93)0.082
Sex (women)415.30(−334.75 to 1165.35)0.277
Geographic region (South)−483.05(−1389.87 to 422.45)0.294
Parents’ METs per week0.24(0.07 to 0.41)0.006
* dependent variable: students’ METs per week, adjusted for variables reported in the Table; METs = Metabolic equivalents.
Table
Table 5. Determinants of nutritional knowledge of students at multivariate linear regression *.
Table 5. Determinants of nutritional knowledge of students at multivariate linear regression *.
ExposuresB(95% CI for B)p
Age0.34(0.25 to 0.43)<0.001
Sex (women)0.03(−0.14 to 0.21)0.710
Geographic region (Calabria)−0.59(−0.87 to −0.31)<0.001
Parents’ GeSNK score percentiles0.08(0.05 to 0.37)0.440
* dependent variable: student GeSNK score percentiles, adjusted for variables reported in the Table; GeSNK = the General and Sport Nutrition Knowledge questionnaire.
Table
Table 6. Determinants of students’ body mass index category at univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis *.
Table 6. Determinants of students’ body mass index category at univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis *.
Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis *
ExposuresB (95% CI for B)pB(95% CI for B)p
Geographic region (south)0.32(0.17 to 0.47)<0.0010.32 (−0.03 to 0.67)0.075
Father’s education level −0.02 (−0.13 to 0.10)0.780−0.05 (−0.23 to 0.14)0.608
Mother’s education level−0.02 (−0.13 to 0.10)0.7830.11 (−0.07 to 0.29)0.215
Physical activity category0.01 (−0.12 to 0.14)0.910−0.06 (−0.20 to 0.08)0.370
Parent MD score category0.05 (−0.15 to 0.25)0.6120.04 (−0.18 to 0.25)0.740
Parent GeSNK category−0.10 (−0.40 to 0.21)0.523−0.18 (−0.47 to 0.12)0.235
Parent BMI category0.30 (0.16 to 0.44)<0.0010.29 (0.13 to 0.45)<0.001
* adjusted also for age, gender, physical activity category, MD category and GeSNK category of students. MD = Mediterranean Diet; GeSNK = the General and Sport Nutrition Knowledge questionnaire; BMI = Body Mass Index.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pellegrino, A.; Bacci, S.; Guido, F.; Zoppi, A.; Toncelli, L.; Stefani, L.; Boddi, M.; Modesti, A.; Modesti, P.A. Interaction between Geographical Areas and Family Environment of Dietary Habits, Physical Activity, Nutritional Knowledge and Obesity of Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021157

AMA Style

Pellegrino A, Bacci S, Guido F, Zoppi A, Toncelli L, Stefani L, Boddi M, Modesti A, Modesti PA. Interaction between Geographical Areas and Family Environment of Dietary Habits, Physical Activity, Nutritional Knowledge and Obesity of Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(2):1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021157

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pellegrino, Alessio, Samuele Bacci, Francesco Guido, Andrea Zoppi, Loira Toncelli, Laura Stefani, Maria Boddi, Alessandra Modesti, and Pietro Amedeo Modesti. 2023. "Interaction between Geographical Areas and Family Environment of Dietary Habits, Physical Activity, Nutritional Knowledge and Obesity of Adolescents" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 2: 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021157

APA Style

Pellegrino, A., Bacci, S., Guido, F., Zoppi, A., Toncelli, L., Stefani, L., Boddi, M., Modesti, A., & Modesti, P. A. (2023). Interaction between Geographical Areas and Family Environment of Dietary Habits, Physical Activity, Nutritional Knowledge and Obesity of Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021157

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop