Next Article in Journal
Cost Sharing and Cost Shifting Mechanisms under a per Diem Payment System in a County of China
Previous Article in Journal
‘With a Little Help from My Friends’: Emotional Intelligence, Social Support, and Distress during the COVID-19 Outbreak
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Non-Cardiac Chest Pain as a Persistent Physical Symptom: Psychological Distress and Workability

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2521; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032521
by Sigrún Ólafsdóttir Flóvenz 1,*, Paul Salkovskis 2, Erla Svansdóttir 3,4, Hróbjartur Darri Karlsson 5, Karl Andersen 3,6 and Jón Friðrik Sigurðsson 1,6
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2521; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032521
Submission received: 12 October 2022 / Revised: 13 January 2023 / Accepted: 27 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Health Care Sciences & Services)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

"Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I thank the authors for sharing their interesting manuscript. I would like to see the following minor revisions:

1.    The authors formulate the aim of the study in the abstract, but omit it in the introduction. It seems to me appropriate to add the aim of the study in the introduction.

2.    The authors formulate hypotheses of the study, but then in the discussion they do not indicate whether these hypotheses were confirmed or disproved. I would add at least a brief statement to the results or discussion (e.g., "Hypothesis 1 is fully confirmed").

3.    There is no reference to the Persistent Physical Symptom Checklist, so it is unclear whether the authors used some valid and reliable instrument or developed their own. In the first case, the source should be stated, and in the second case, the instrument, its development, and preliminary psychometric properties should be described in detail.

4.    Line 207: missing dot and space between «p < 0.001» and «The average number…».

5.    I would recommend adding the limitations of the study, its prospects and practical implications.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The current revision is accepted

Back to TopTop