Next Article in Journal
The Association between Nursing Skill Mix and Patient Outcomes in a Mental Health Setting: An Observational Feasibility Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Epidemiological Characteristics of Notifiable Respiratory Infectious Diseases in Mainland China from 2010 to 2018
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Medical Services to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in a Low-Incidence Urban City: An Observational Epidemiological Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation Study of xMAP TIER Assay on a Microsphere-Based Platform for Detecting First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Sexual Behavior and Perceived Loneliness in Elderly People Living with HIV in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2714; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032714
by Yushan Hou, Chang Cai, Houlin Tang, Yichen Jin, Fangfang Chen, Dandan Niu and Fan Lv *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2714; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032714
Submission received: 11 December 2022 / Revised: 31 January 2023 / Accepted: 1 February 2023 / Published: 3 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tuberculosis and HIV)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please, I suggest that the authors review the methods and results sections. There are texts that do not agree with the objectives and methodology.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

How was the reliability of the "loneliness" evaluated in your study?

How was the validity and reliability of the “HIV disclosure status and discrimination” evaluated?

In the results section, when you have fully mentioned the findings in the tables, there is no need to repeat them in full detail in the text. Please summarize the findings in the text.

The discussion section needs serious revision. In the discussion section, you have repeated the results, which is better to justify and criticize the results of your study with others.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop