Next Article in Journal
Portuguese Version of the HLS-EU-Q6 and HLS-EU-Q16 Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Water Environment Characteristics and Water Quality Assessment of Water Source of Diversion System of Project from Hanjiang to Weihe River
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph20042891
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Association between Problematic Use of Smartphones and Mental Health in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review

by
Samira Bouazza
1,*,
Samira Abbouyi
1,
Soukaina El Kinany
2,
Karima El Rhazi
1 and
Btissame Zarrouq
1,3
1
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Research in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30070, Morocco
2
Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Errachidia, Moulay Ismail University of Meknes, Errachidia 52000, Morocco
3
Department of Biology and Geology, Teachers Training College (Ecole Normale Superieure), Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30030, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 2891; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042891
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 21 January 2023 / Accepted: 2 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Smartphones have become essential components of daily life, and research into the harmful effects of problematic smartphone use (PSU) on mental health is expanding in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This issue has yet to be synthesized and critically evaluated. To find quantitative observational studies on the relationship between PSU and mental health in the MENA region, we developed a search equation and adapted it for four databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed during the selection process. This review included 32 cross-sectional studies and one cohort study. The available language was English. All identified studies published until 8 October 2021, were considered. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The studies enrolled 21,487 people and had low-to-moderate methodological quality. The prevalence of PSU ranged from 4.3 to 97.8 percent. The time factor, type of application used on the smartphone, and sociodemographic characteristics were the determinants of PSU. Depression, anxiety, and stress were strongly correlated with PSU. Epidemiological longitudinal studies that respect the quality of evidence are needed in all MENA countries to better plan and implement preventive measures against PSU.

1. Introduction

Smartphones have rapidly evolved, and the diverse tasks they can perform have led to their use in a wide range of daily activities. We are compelled to regularly use our smartphones for answering calls, responding to messages, searching for information, working/studying online, and distracting ourselves [1]. Checking smartphones anywhere, anytime, and under any circumstances has become a habit that can evolve into problematic behavior when associated with unexpected outcomes [2].
Several studies have found that smartphone use is associated with numerous dysfunctions in daily life. These flaws affect physical and mental health, social relationships, and academic as well as professional achievement [3,4,5]. Problematic smartphone use (PSU) has been linked to physical health issues, such as neck and wrist pain, eye discomfort, and sleep disorders [3,4,5], as well as mental disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and stress [3,4,5,6,7].
The concept of smartphone addiction (dependency) originated in the wake of a series of studies examining the harmful impacts of smartphones on users’ daily functioning, albeit it has yet to be fully characterized [2,5]. In 2012, Billieux defined problematic cellphone use as “an inability to regulate one’s use of the mobile phone, which eventually involves negative consequences in daily life” [8] (p. 1). In 2016, De-Sola et al. argued that there is considerable comparability between PSU and substance use disorder [9] because many of the symptoms of PSU, such as withdrawal, tolerance, craving, salience, and lack of control, are also symptoms of substance use disorder [4,7]. Other surveys, on the other hand, have overlooked the occurrence of withdrawal, tolerance, and loss of control symptoms in PSU [10]. The disparity between the findings of studies in this field, combined with the poor number of neurobiological studies that have invested in this area, resulted in a lack of agreement on how to define PSU and its subsequent recognition as a type of behavioral addiction by the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM5). Gambling disorder is indeed the only recognized behavior as a non-substance-related addictive disorder. Other behaviors that have been studied for their addictive potentials, such as hypersexuality, shopping, and internet use, have not been admitted to this section for the lack of sufficient evidence [1,11,12].
Despite the disagreement over PSU definition, the number of studies investing in this field is growing and exploring various phenomena that concurrently manifest with excessive smartphone use. These studies continue to reveal the harmful effects of PSU, which piques the interest of public health officials around the world. As a result, numerous psychometric scales have been developed to identify individuals suffering from PSU [10]. These scales have been developed in several languages, including English (Problematic Mobile Phone Use Questionnaire-Revised: PMPUQ-R), Chinese (Mobile Phone Addiction Index: MPAI), Turkish (Mobile Addiction Scale: MAS), Korean (Smartphone Addiction Scale: SAS, Smartphone Addiction Scale Short Version: SAS-SV), Spanish (Mobile Phone Addiction Craving Scale: MPACS), and Arabic (untitled smartphone addiction scale) [10].
At the same time, several examinations of the association between PSU and mental health distress have been carried out, and they have confirmed the strong relationship between these two issues [3]. Among the determinants of PSU, there are those which are linked to the sociodemographic characteristics of individuals [3]; we tried to focus on the population of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, which share several socio-cultural traits. The goal behind this is to systematically review and synthesize evidence on the prevalence of PSU and its relationship with mental health disorders. Determining the relationship between PSU and mental health has important implications for raising public awareness about the impact of PSU on mental health and also for the development of clinical guidelines adapted to the socio-cultural context of this population to minimize or prevent mental health illness among smartphone users of the MENA region.
A systematic review of studies that were conducted in the MENA region to reach this objective, which focused on the association between PSU and mental health problems, mainly depression, anxiety, and stress, was carried out.
Various criteria were taken into consideration in the selection of the MENA region. First, except for Iran, all countries in the MENA region have Arabic as their official language [13] and subsequently share some traditions and customs. Second, this region is experiencing rapid demographic growth. In 2020, for instance, the population of this region represented 5.4% of the world population, and young people under 35 years old, who may be vulnerable to PSU, account for two-thirds of the MENA population [14]. Third, according to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), smartphone ownership in Arab countries reached more than 80% in 2017, with increasing internet penetration in this population’s households [15]. Statistical data for the year 2022 indicates that the internet penetration rate was 84.1% in Morocco, 60.6% in Algeria, 71.9% in Egypt, and 98% in Qatar, while the mobile connection rate was 129.3% in Morocco, 103.5% in Algeria and 93.4% in Egypt [16]. As a result of the problematic use of smartphones, the MENA population is becoming increasingly vulnerable to the risks of mental illness, endangering their well-being and quality of life. Moreover, the public health system in this region suffers from insufficient mental health expenditure and interventions [17]. Given that this review is part of a research project focusing on the impact of PSU on the mental health of young Moroccans and that social risk factors for PSU exist, it is critical to have data on this subject from other countries that are socio-culturally close, such as those in the MENA region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

The PRISMA statement guidelines were followed in the conduct of this systematic review [18]. Additionally, an a priori protocol was registered on PROSPERO under the number CRD42022266732. All quantitative observational studies in the MENA region that looked at the relationship between PSU and mental health were found in four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane. The only language available was English. References to included articles were individually checked to ensure that no articles were overlooked. All identified papers published up to 8 October 2021 were taken into account.

2.2. Search Terms

A variety of terms were employed to ensure the detection of all studies concerning the PSU and its relationship to mental health in the MENA region. The search equation that was devised was as follows: (“smartphone addiction” OR “smart phone addiction” OR “smartphone problematic use” OR “smartphone overuse” OR “smartphone abuse” OR “smartphone use” OR “mobile phone dependence” OR “mobile phone addiction” OR “mobile phone problematic use” OR “mobile phone overuse” OR “ mobile phone use” OR “cellular phone dependence”) AND (mental health OR mental disorder OR psychopathology OR depression OR anxiety OR stress) AND (Morocco OR Moroccan OR Algeria OR Algerian OR Tunisia OR Tunisian OR Libya OR Libyan OR Mauritania OR Mauritanian OR Lebanon OR Lebanese OR Syria OR Syrian OR Jordan OR Jordanian OR Iraq OR Iraqi OR Iran OR Iranian OR Persian OR Israel OR Israeli OR Palestine OR Palestinian OR Sudan OR Sudanese OR Djibouti OR Djiboutian OR Ethiopia OR Ethiopian OR Egypt OR Egyptian OR Qatar OR Qatari OR Bahrain OR Bahraini OR Kuwait OR Kuwaiti OR Oman OR Omani OR united Arab emirates OR Saudi Arabia OR Yemen OR Yemenite OR MENA region OR “middle east” OR “north Africa” OR “Arab world”). This equation has been divided into several parts when searching in the ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases.

2.3. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

We only included quantitative observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies) on smartphone use and its association with mental health, specifically anxiety, depression, and stress, in the MENA region while excluding qualitative and experimental studies from this review.

2.4. Data Extraction

Two authors independently reviewed all identified studies for the relevance of the inclusion/exclusion criteria. They extracted specific data from each study, including the first author’s name, year of study, study design, country, sample size, sociodemographic characteristics of the study population (age and gender), PSU definition and prevalence, and PSU and mental health assessment tools.

2.5. Quality Assessment

A modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality of each study included in this systematic review [19,20]. This scale concentrated on three study domains: selection, comparability, and exposure. Studies in the selection domain can be classified as poor quality (0 or 1 star), moderate (2 stars), or good quality (3 stars). In the domain of comparability, studies can be sorted as poor quality (0 stars) or good quality (1 or 2 stars). While for the third domain, exposure, studies can be categorized as poor quality (0 or 1 star), moderate quality (2 stars), or good quality (3 stars). The GRADE system was used to assess the quality of evidence in the included studies [21].

3. Results

The search yielded 14,280 references. After excluding duplicate studies from PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, and after stepwise exclusion of research outside the scope of our review, 29 articles remained for inclusion in this systematic review. We discovered four additional relevant papers by consulting the references of the included studies, which resulted in the inclusion of 33 original studies published between 2014 and 2021 in our systematic review. Figure 1 depicts a flowchart of the research strategy and study selection process.
One of the thirty-three articles included for review was a cohort study, and the other thirty-two were cross-sectional studies. Iran had the most studies (n = 12), followed by Lebanon (n = 6), Saudi Arabia (n = 4), United Arab Emirates (n = 3), Egypt and Israel (n = 2 each), and one study each from Kuwait, Jordan, and Oman. There were no studies that met our eligibility criteria from Algeria, Bahrain, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Iraq, Mauritania, Morocco, Libya, Palestine, Qatar, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, or Yemen (Table 1).
Table 2 and Table 3 shows the quality ratings of the cross-sectional and cohort studies that were chosen (Table 2 and Table 3). Three domains were consulted to define the quality assessment of included studies. The first was the exposure domain. All included studies relied on self-report, and the statistical test used to analyze data was clearly described, as was the measurement of the association, which involved the probability level and/or confidence interval. Subsequently, all the included studies were classified as moderate in this exposure domain. The selection domain was the second domain considered in this classification, with 26 studies of high quality according to this domain [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,35,38,39,41,43,44,45,46,48,50,51,52,53,54]. Comparability was the third domain. In this domain, the fifteen studies that controlled for confounding factors while analyzing the associated variables with PSU were of high quality [22,25,27,29,31,32,34,38,41,42,43,44,48,51,52]. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Table 4 were used to assess the overall quality of the studies [19,20] (Table 4). The current systematic review included studies of moderate (15 studies) or poor (18 studies) methodological quality.

3.1. PSU Definition

There were several definitions of problematic smartphone use. According to some authors, it is the inability to limit phone use that eventually disrupts the users’ functioning [23,24,25,44,45,49], while other authors claimed that problematic smartphone use was a type of behavioral addiction that included salience, preoccupation, tolerance, withdrawal, and compulsive symptoms [27,28,32,43,49,50,52].

3.2. PSU Measurement Tools

A total of 13 validated scales were used to assess the prevalence of PSU. Smartphone Addiction Scale Short Version (SAS-SV) was the most commonly used scale (used in 12 studies), followed by Smartphone Addiction Scale SAS (used in 5 studies), while the Mobile Phone Problematic Use Scale MPPUS-10, the Smartphone Addiction Inventory SPAI, the Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale SABAS, and the Mobile Phone Addiction Index MPAI were all used in two different papers. The comparison of prevalence values measured by these scales revealed a high degree of variability. The prevalence of PSU, which was measured by SAS-SV in seven studies conducted in Iran, Lebanon, Kuwait, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia [23,26,32,43,49,50,52], varied between 17% and 71.96%, whereas the one measured by SAS was 95.8% in Egypt [35].

3.3. Determinants of PSU

PSU was associated with the time factor, variety of smartphone usage, and sociodemographic characteristics, according to the studies included in the current systematic review.

3.3.1. Time Factor

In total, ten studies found that PSU was positively and significantly associated with the average duration of daily mobile use [26,31,35,37,40,42,48,49,50], which was determined as more than 4 h [26,31] or 5 h [48] in the studies conducted by Buabbas A.J. et al., EL-Sayed Desouky et al., and Matar Boumosleh J. et al. Despite this, only a single study considered that the daily time spent using a mobile phone was a significant predictor of PSU [42]. Some studies have highlighted other time modalities affecting smartphone use, such as checking smartphones at night [36,44], higher frequency of mobile phone use during the day, the shorter time until first mobile phone usage in the morning [29,49], the number of hours per session using smartphone [26], and younger age of owning or first use of the smartphone, which was also significantly correlated with PSU [31,48,50].

3.3.2. Variety of Smartphone Usage

The most stated reasons for smartphone use in the studies included in this review were entertainment, calling, and texting [40,48,50]. The majority of features used by individuals were social networking sites and messaging functions [29,37,38,49,50]. Therefore, the PSU tended to be higher when smartphones were used for social media, chatting, or gaming [46,48,49,50].

3.3.3. Sociodemographic Characteristics

The findings of the identified studies on the relationship between gender and PSU were inconclusive. Most studies discovered no significant gender differences in PSU; however, some other studies found that the risk of smartphone addiction was higher in females than males [26,28,31,37,44] and that being female predicts PSU [31,42]. In contrast, other studies have found that males have a higher PSU than females [32,35,40,49].
Studies on the relationship between age and PSU were also inconclusive. While five studies found no link between age and PSU [33,38,42,50,53], other studies found no association between PSU and younger age [27,32,39,41,43,46,48] and that younger age was a significant predictor of PSU [41]. In contrast, a single study claimed the existence of an association between older age and PSU [31]. Regarding marital status, there was no significant association with PSU in seven of the studies examined in this review [25,27,30,41,42,50,53], whereas other studies revealed that PSU was higher in singles than married people [31,32,39,46] and that being single predicts PSU [31].
Other sociodemographic characteristics and PSU, such as income, type of residence, and educational level, have yielded mixed results in epidemiological studies. Concerning the association between PSU and education level, four studies reported that PSU was significantly associated with education level [31,32,48,53]; nine other studies found no relationship between PSU and education level [25,27,29,30,41,42,43,44,50].

3.4. PSU and Mental Health

Twenty-three different validated scales and one independent questionnaire were used to assess mental health. Almost all the studies included in this systematic review (33 papers) revealed a decline in mental health with PSU.

3.4.1. Depression

Researchers found a significant positive correlation between PSU and depression in 14,103 participants across 16 studies [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,31,33,35,37,41,42,43,45,50], with magnitudes ranging from 0.164 to 0.996 and significance ranging from 0.001 to 0.01. The prevalence and severity of depression in the MENA region’s population were assessed using a variety of instruments. As a result, according to the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CEDSD-10), the prevalence of depression was 68.6 percent in Emirati students aged 18 to 33 years [42], and 32.7 percent and 50.72 percent in Saudi Arabian and Egyptian students aged 18 to 26 years, respectively [23,31]. The Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression (HRSD) revealed that 8.4 percent of nursing Egyptian students had moderate-to-severe depression [35], and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in Middle Eastern postgraduate students revealed that 34.1 percent of high smartphone users had moderate-to-severe depression [27].
As for the determinants of depression, the findings of the various studies included in the current systematic review were inconclusive. Some studies found that depression was significantly and negatively correlated with age and that it primarily affected females [26,42,45], whereas other studies found no significant correlation between depression and sociodemographic factors [50].
Some studies found that depression was significantly associated with the duration of smartphone use (r = 0.15; p < 0.001) [37], daily smartphone use (r = 0.11; p < 0.05) [42], and using smartphones for entertainment [50].
Other mental health problems were positively and significantly correlated with depression according to two studies, which were anxiety (r = 0.6; p < 0.001) [37], stress (r = 0.71; p < 0.001) [37], rumination (r = 0.38; p < 0.01) [28], and fear of missing out (r = 0.43; p < 0.01) [28]. However, two studies found that a significant negative correlation exists between depression and self-esteem [35,42] with magnitudes of r = −0.48 (p < 0.01) and r = −0.92 (p = 0.006), respectively. Self-esteem was measured in these two studies using two various scales (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale RSES and Self-esteem Inventory).

3.4.2. Anxiety

The relationship between anxiety and PSU was studied in 13 studies [22,23,25,26,28,30,31,34,37,41,45,48,51], 10 of which [22,23,25,26,28,30,31,34,37,45] found a significant positive correlation between PSU and anxiety in 11,030 participants, with magnitudes ranging from 0.12 to 0.562 and significance between 0.001 and 0.05. For example, in Lebanese students with an average age of 20.64 ± 1.88, it was discovered that each increase of one unit in anxiety scores increases the total score of PSU by 1.7 folds [48], while anxiety is one of the most significant predictors of PSU in Iranian students were aged on average 22.29 ± 3.5 [41]. In contrast, social anxiety explained 31.5 percent of the variance in PSU rating in Israeli students [34].
For the sociodemographic determinants of anxiety, contradictory results were found concerning gender. Thus, female students from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait had a significantly higher prevalence of trait anxiety than males [26,28,31]; contrariwise, Omani male students were more anxious than females [30].
Concerning mental health problems, they were positively correlated with anxiety, insomnia (r = 0.439; p < 0.05), stress (r = 0.895; p < 0.05), depression (0.63 ≤ r ≤ 0.74; p < 0.01), rumination (r = 0.37; p < 0.01), and fear of missing out (r = 0.34; p < 0.01) were mentioned by three studies [26,28,30].

3.4.3. Stress

Seven [26,30,37,38,45,47,52] of the nine studies [26,30,37,38,40,45,47,49,52] that mentioned stress as a factor associated with PSU highlighted a positive correlation between PSU and perceived stress in 7374 participants, with a correlation coefficient ranging from 0.14 to 0.508 and degrees of significance ranging from 0.0005 to 0.5. For example, the stress prevalence in Saudi Arabian students with an average age of around 23 years was 41.26 percent, and more students with PSU belonged to the stressed group (p = 0.0001) [49].
Regarding the relationship between stress and sociodemographic variables, Omani male students were more stressed than females, and students living off-campus were more stressed than those living on campus [30]. According to the findings of two studies, Kuwaiti and Jordanian female students were more stressed than males [26,29]. A single study found no correlation between perceived stress and gender or academic performance [52].
In terms of smartphone use patterns, stress was significantly correlated with the duration of smartphone use (r = 0.21; p < 0.001) among Emirati students aged 18 to 24 years (r = 0.21; p < 0.001) [37].
Concerning the relationship between anxiety and other mental health disorders, stress was found to be positively correlated with insomnia (r = 0.449; p < 0.05) in Emirati students [37] and negatively correlated with life satisfaction (r = −0.492; p < 0.0005) in Lebanese students [52]. Furthermore, stress was found to be positively and significantly related to depression (r = 0.65; p < 0.01) and anxiety (r = 0.67; p < 0.01) [26].
Figure 2 depicts a summary of the current systematic review findings.

4. Discussion

PSU was defined by Goodman as the failure to control the use of smartphones, which adversely influences users [56]. Griffiths insists on addiction symptoms, such as salience, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict, and relapse [57]. This disparity in characterizing the concept of PSU resulted in the use of various terms to denote excessive smartphone use, such as “addiction”, “problematic use”, or “dependence”.
The prevalence of PSU ranged from 4.3 percent to 97.8 percent in the current systematic review. This significant disparity can be explained in a variety of ways. The first is the lack of a standardized tool to assess the prevalence of PSU in all the studies included in this review; instead, 13 different validated scales (e.g., SAS, SAS-SV, MPPUS-10, MPAI, SPAI…) were used to assess the prevalence of PSU in the included studies. The second factor to consider was the population studied, which involved the general population, office workers, nurses, university students, and female secondary school students. Furthermore, various PSU thresholds were used, and several studies only reported the average score rather than the prevalence. It was extremely difficult to compare results, consequently. This systematic review is also intended to investigate the factors that influence PSU. PSU was associated with some time factors, such as average duration of daily mobile use, checking smartphone during the night, frequency of mobile phone use, and the time one spends before consulting their mobile phones when getting up in the morning, according to the findings of various studies in the MENA region. These findings were consistent with numerous studies conducted in different parts of the world [2,58,59,60]
PSU was also linked to sociodemographic factors, such as age. Several studies conducted worldwide [3] found that young people were more vulnerable to PSU, as is the case in the MENA region. Gender, marital status, income, educational level, and the type of residence of smartphone users produced mixed results. There was no general tendency in the relationship between PSU and the previously stated variables, as had been demonstrated in previous research in other parts of the world [60].
PSU, depression, anxiety, and stress were all interconnected in terms of mental health. However, it is worth noting that the association between PSU and depression was stronger than the association between anxiety and stress. These findings are consistent with other studies conducted outside the MENA region [3,4,7].
Females and younger people are more prone to depression [61,62,63]. Numerous studies have been proposed to clarify this mood disorder, the risks of which may be social, educational, or biological in nature. Females and younger people are more prone to depression [63], motivating them to engage in virtual relationships via smartphone applications, such as social networks, which increases the frequency and duration of their device consultation, resulting in PSU. Furthermore, females are predisposed to depression due to cyclical variations in sex hormone concentration [64,65]. Since many studies have been conducted on students, it is assumed that depression is caused by the stressful environment of schools or universities, as well as the lack of space and recreation time. To distract themselves, students frequently seek refuge in smartphone functions, such as games and interpersonal communication, which can be addictive [66,67].
Some evidence in the study suggested that PSU in the MENA region was linked to subsequent stress, anxiety, and insomnia, which was supported by other studies [68,69,70]. The association between PSU and insomnia could be explained by the fact that excessive smartphone use causes the user to stay up late at night to not miss a message, information, or stage of an online game, which causes sleep disruption due to exposure to radiation and blue light from smartphone screens, which affects the onset time of melatonin [68,71].
Regarding the association between PSU and mental health in the MENA region, studies evoked that self-esteem and satisfaction with life were correlated with depression and stress among smartphone users. Thus, PSU can be considered a social issue caused by a lack of face-to-face social relationships [72]. This weak engagement in social activities among smartphone users promotes unhealthy interpersonal trust in the individuals, which influences their self-esteem [73] and life satisfaction in general [74,75].
To measure the prevalence of PSU and mental health outcomes, researchers usually used a self-report questionnaire which is considered a subjective way of collecting data. However, a single study objectively and subjectively measured the use of smartphones at night [36] and demonstrated that there was a difference between the two measurements and that the objective measure most closely matched reality. Based on the findings of this study, it will be exceptionally beneficial to further investigate PSU and its associated mental disorder by using objective measurements for smartphone exposure and formal diagnosis for mental health problems. The coupling of data collection based on subjective methods (self-administered questionnaires) and those resulting from objective methods (diagnostics and objective measurements) is not taken for granted, which is why there is an interest in seeking opportunities for adequate funding for the subject of study that will contribute to improving the quality of the data obtained. Furthermore, an improvement in the quality of studies in this field during statistical analyses is required to have more convincing results concerning the relationship between PSU and mental health distress and not to be content with simple correlational studies. Without forgetting to emphasize the importance of cohort studies in confirming the causal relationships between variables in a study, there is a pressing need to conduct this type of study on this subject to highlight the impact of PSU on individuals’ mental health.
Another intriguing aspect of this review was the inclusion of a study [22] that focused on the role of metacognition in PSU and found that smartphone metacognitions predicted PSU. Metacognition is one of the psychological approaches that explain addictive behavior emergence. Wells conceptualized it as a conductor of thought. Indeed, the metacognitive model of addictive behavior confirms that metacognitive beliefs play a critical role in the generation and persistence of behaviors [76]. Several studies have found a significant positive relationship between metacognition beliefs and addictive behaviors [77,78], supporting the efficacy of interventions that target metacognition or metacognitive therapy for people suffering from PSU.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this systematic review summarized the findings of all English-language studies that looked at the relationship between PSU and mental health, specifically depression, anxiety, and stress, in MENA countries. Unfortunately, the cross-sectional design of most studies included in this review hampered determining the causal relationship between PSU and mental health problems. However, we can still conclude that PSU is a real public health issue related to mental illnesses and social dysfunctions, which constitute a wearisome burden for society. Given that the management of mental illnesses in Morocco, as in other MENA countries, suffers from a lack of specialized human resources and reception structures (e.g., 557 psychiatrists and psychologists for a population of 37.08 million in Morocco) [79], there is an urgent need to implement preventive measures, particularly at the school level, because young people are the most affected. These preventive measures must be tailored to the cultural context and socioeconomic needs of the region’s population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.B., S.A., B.Z. and K.E.R.; Methodology: S.B., S.A., B.Z. and K.E.R.; Data curation: S.B.; Writing—original draft preparation: S.B., S.A. and B.Z.; Writing—review and editing: S.B., S.A., B.Z., K.E.R. and S.E.K.; Visualization: S.B.; Supervision: B.Z. and K.E.R. Validation: All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Panova, T.; Carbonell, X. Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? J. Behav. Addict. 2018, 7, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Park, J.; Jeong, J.E.; Rho, M.J. Predictors of Habitual and Addictive Smartphone Behavior in Problematic Smartphone Use. Psychiatry Investig. 2021, 18, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sohn, S.Y.; Rees, P.; Wildridge, B.; Kalk, N.J.; Carter, B. Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: A systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, J.; Fu, X.; Liao, X.; Li, Y. Association of problematic smartphone use with poor sleep quality, depression, and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 284, 112686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yu, S.; Sussman, S. Does Smartphone Addiction Fall on a Continuum of Addictive Behaviors? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Thomée, S. Mobile Phone Use and Mental Health. A Review of the Research That Takes a Psychological Perspective on Exposure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elhai, J.D.; Levine, J.C.; Hall, B.J. The relationship between anxiety symptom severity and problematic smartphone use: A review of the literature and conceptual frameworks. J. Anxiety Disord. 2019, 62, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Billieux, J. Problematic Use of the Mobile Phone: A Literature Review and a Pathways Model. Curr. Psychiatry Rev. 2012, 8, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De-Sola Gutiérrez, J.; Rodríguez de Fonseca, F.; Rubio, G. Cell-Phone Addiction: A Review. Front. Psychiatry 2016, 7, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Harris, B.; Regan, T.; Schueler, J.; Fields, S.A. Problematic Mobile Phone and Smartphone Use Scales: A Systematic Review. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grant, J.E.; Chamberlain, S.R. Expanding the definition of addiction: DSM-5 vs. ICD-11. CNS Spectr. 2016, 21, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Potenza, M.N. Non-substance addictive behaviors in the context of DSM-5. Addict. Behav. 2014, 39, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. IstiZada. MENA Region Countries List 2020 Update. Available online: http://istizada.com/mena-region/ (accessed on 5 June 2021).
  14. World Bank. Moyen-Orient & Afrique du Nord—Vue d’Ensemble. Available online: https://www.banquemondiale.org/fr/region/mena/overview (accessed on 5 June 2021).
  15. ITU. Measuring the Information Society Report 2018. Available online: https://www.itu.int:443/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/misr2018.aspx (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  16. DataReportal—Global Digital Insights. Reports. Available online: https://datareportal.com/reports (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  17. Zeinoun, P.; Akl, E.A.; Maalouf, F.T.; Meho, L.I. The Arab Region’s Contribution to Global Mental Health Research (2009–2018): A Bibliometric Analysis. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009, 339, b2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wells, G.A.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Available online: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed on 23 September 2021).
  20. Herzog, R.; Álvarez-Pasquin, M.J.; Díaz, C.; Del Barrio, J.L.; Estrada, J.M.; Gil, Á. Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Guyatt, G.H.; Oxman, A.D.; Vist, G.E.; Kunz, R.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Alonso-Coello, P.; Schünemann, H.J. GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008, 336, 924–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Akbari, M.; Zamani, E.; Fioravanti, G.; Casale, S. Psychometric properties of the Metacognitions about Smartphone Use Questionnaire (MSUQ) in a sample of iranians. Addict. Behav. 2021, 114, 106722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Okasha, T.; Saad, A.; Ibrahim, I.; Elhabiby, M.; Khalil, S.; Morsy, M. Prevalence of smartphone addiction and its correlates in a sample of Egyptian university students. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 2021, 68, 1580–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Barzegari, S.; Arpaci, I.; Ranjbar, A.Z.; Afrooz, E.; Ghazisaeedi, M. Persian Version of the Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI-PV): Psychometric Evidence of Validity and Reliability. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zeidan, J.; Hallit, S.; Akel, M.; Louragli, I.; Obeid, S. Problematic smartphone use and affective temperaments among Lebanese young adults: Scale validation and mediating role of self-esteem. BMC Psychol. 2021, 9, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Buabbas, A.J.; Hasan, H.; Buabbas, M.A. The associations between smart device use and psychological distress among secondary and high school students in Kuwait. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0251479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alageel, A.A.; Alyahya, R.A.; ABahatheq, Y.; Alzunaydi, N.A.; Alghamdi, R.A.; Alrahili, N.M.; McIntyre, R.S.; Iacobucci, M. Smartphone addiction and associated factors among postgraduate students in an Arabic sample: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2021, 21, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vally, Z.; Alghraibeh, A.M.; Elhai, J.D. Severity of depression and anxiety in relation to problematic smartphone use in the United Arab Emirates: The mediational roles of rumination and fear of missing out. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 3, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sanusi, S.Y.; Al-Batayneh, O.B.; Khader, Y.S.; Saddki, N. The association of smartphone addiction, sleep quality and perceived stress amongst Jordanian dental students. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2021, 26, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Al Battashi, N.; Al Omari, O.; Sawalha, M.; Al Maktoumi, S.; Alsuleitini, A.; Al Qadire, M. The Relationship Between Smartphone Use, Insomnia, Stress, and Anxiety Among University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2020, 30, 734–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. El-Sayed Desouky, D.; Abu-Zaid, H. Mobile phone use pattern and addiction in relation to depression and anxiety. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2020, 26, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Derakhshanrad, N.; Yekaninejad, M.S.; Mehrdad, R.; Saberi, H. Neck pain associated with smartphone overuse: Cross-sectional report of a cohort study among office workers. Eur. Spine J. 2021, 30, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fallahtafti, S.; Ghanbaripirkashani, N.; Alizadeh, S.S.; Rovoshi, R.S. Psychometric Properties of the Smartphone Addiction Scale—Short Version (SAS-SV) in a Sample of Iranian Adolescents. Int. J. Dev. Sci. 2020, 14, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Turgeman, L.; Hefner, I.; Bazon, M.; Yehoshua, O.; Weinstein, A. Studies on the Relationship between Social Anxiety and Excessive Smartphone Use and on the Effects of Abstinence and Sensation Seeking on Excessive Smartphone Use. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mohamed, S.M.; Mostafa, M.H. Impact of smartphone addiction on depression and self-esteem among nursing students. Nurs. Open 2020, 7, 1346–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shoval, D.; Tal, N.; Tzischinsky, O. Relationship of smartphone use at night with sleep quality and psychological well-being among healthy students: A pilot study. Sleep Health 2020, 6, 495–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vally, Z.; Alowais, A. Assessing Risk for Smartphone Addiction: Validation of an Arabic Version of the Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2022, 20, 691–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mosalanejad, L.; Nikbakht, G.; Abdollahifrad, S.; Kalani, N. The Prevalence of Smartphone Addiction and its Relationship with Personality Traits, Loneliness and Daily Stress of Students in Jahrom University of Medical Sciences in 2014: A Cross-sectional Analytical Study. J. Res. Med. Dent. Sci. 2019, 7, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  39. Miri, M.; Tiyuri, A.; Bahlgerdi, M.; Miri, M.; Miri, F.; Salehiniya, H. Mobile addiction and its relationship with quality of life in medical students. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2020, 8, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saberi, H.; Kashani, M.M.; Badi, H.Z. Evaluation of cell phone addiction in shahid beheshti hospital nurses in Kashan. Int. Arch. Health Sci. 2019, 6, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ranjbaran, M.; Soleimani, B.; Mohammadi, M.; Ghorbani, N.; Khodadost, M.; Mansori, K.; Samani, R.O. Association between General Health and Mobile Phone Dependency among Medical University Students: A Cross-sectional Study in Iran. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2019, 10, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vally, Z.; El Hichami, F. An examination of problematic mobile phone use in the United Arab Emirates: Prevalence, correlates, and predictors in a college-aged sample of young adults. Addict. Behav. Rep. 2019, 9, 100185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Alhassan, A.A.; Alqadhib, E.M.; Taha, N.W.; Alahmari, R.A.; Salam, M.; Almutairi, A.F. The relationship between addiction to smartphone usage and depression among adults: A cross sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2018, 18, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mahmoodi, H.; Nadrian, H.; Shaghaghi, A.; Jafarabadi, M.A.; Ahmadi, A.; Saqqezi, G.S. Factors associated with mental health among high school students in Iran: Does mobile phone overuse associate with poor mental health? J. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2018, 31, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lin, C.Y.; Imani, V.; Brostrom, A.; Nilsen, P.; Fung, X.C.C.; Griffiths, M.D.; Pakpour, A.H. Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Among Iranian Adolescents: A Psychometric Study. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2019, 17, 765–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nahas, M.; Hlais, S.; Saberian, C.; Antoun, J. Problematic smartphone use among Lebanese adults aged 18–65 years using MPPUS-10. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 87, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zeeni, N.; Doumit, R.; Abi Kharma, J.; Sanchez-Ruiz, M.J. Media, Technology Use, and Attitudes: Associations With Physical and Mental Well-Being in Youth With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 2018, 15, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Matar Boumosleh, J.; Jaalouk, D. Depression, anxiety, and smartphone addiction in university students- A cross sectional study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Venkatesh, E.; Jemal, M.Y.A.; Samani, A.S.A. Smart phone usage and addiction among dental students in Saudi Arabia: A cross sectional study. Int. J. Adolesc. Med. Health 2017, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abdulaziz, N.; Al-Thebaiti, A.A.; Al-Awwad, A.A.; ZabarAl-Anzi, R.; Asseri, T.M. The Association Between Smartphone Use Pattern, Smartphone Addiction, and Depression among Female Secondary School Students in Khobar, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2017, 6, 310–314. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hawi, N.S.; Samaha, M. Relationships among smartphone addiction, anxiety, and family relations. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2017, 36, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Samaha, M.; Hawi, N.S. Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 57, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tavakolizadeh, J.; Atarodi, A.; Ahmadpour, S.; Pourgheisar, A. The Prevalence of Excessive Mobile Phone Use and its Relation With Mental Health Status and Demographic Factors Among the Students of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences in 2011–2012. Razavi Int. J. Med. 2014, 2, e15527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Babadi-Akashe, Z.; Zamani, B.E.; Abedini, Y.; Akbari, H.; Hedayati, N. The Relationship between Mental Health and Addiction to Mobile Phones among University Students of Shahrekord, Iran. Addict. Health 2014, 6, 93–99. [Google Scholar]
  55. McPheeters, M.L.; Kripalani, S.; Peterson, N.B.; Idowu, R.T.; Jerome, R.N.; Potter, S.A.; Andrews, J.C. Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of the Science—Vol. 3: Quality Improvement Interventions to Address Health Disparities; Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 208.3; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD, USA, 2012. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK107315/ (accessed on 23 September 2021).
  56. Goodman, A. Addiction: Definition and implications. Br. J. Addict. 1990, 85, 1403–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Griffiths, M. A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. J. Subst. Use 2005, 10, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Haug, S.; Castro, R.P.; Kwon, M.; Filler, A.; Kowatsch, T.; Schaub, M.P. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J. Behav. Addict. 2015, 4, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Randler, C.; Wolfgang, L.; Matt, K.; Demirhan, E.; Horzum, M.B.; Beşoluk, Ş. Smartphone addiction proneness in relation to sleep and morningness–eveningness in German adolescents. J. Behav. Addict. 2016, 5, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Cha, S.S.; Seo, B.K. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction in middle school students in Korea: Prevalence, social networking service, and game use. Health Psychol. Open 2018, 5, 2055102918755046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Demirci, K.; Akgönül, M.; Akpinar, A. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. J. Behav. Addict. 2015, 4, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kim, M.O.; Kim, H.; Kim, K.; Ju, S.; Choi, J.; Yu, M. Smartphone Addiction: (Focused Depression, Aggression and Impulsion) among College Students. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2015, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mohammadi, M.R.; Alavi, S.S.; Ahmadi, N.; Khaleghi, A.; Kamali, K.; Ahmadi, A.; Hooshyari, Z.; Mohamadian, F.; Jaberghaderi, N.; Nazaribadie, M.; et al. The prevalence, comorbidity and socio-demographic factors of depressive disorder among Iranian children and adolescents: To identify the main predictors of depression. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 247, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Eloul, L.; Ambusaidi, A.; Al-Adawi, S. Silent Epidemic of Depression in Women in the Middle East and North Africa Region. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2009, 9, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  65. Naninck, E.F.G.; Lucassen, P.J.; Bakker, J. Sex Differences in Adolescent Depression: Do Sex Hormones Determine Vulnerability?: Sex differences in adolescent depression. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2011, 23, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. González-Bueso, V.; Santamaría, J.J.; Fernández, D.; Merino, L.; Montero, E.; Ribas, J. Association between Internet Gaming Disorder or Pathological Video-Game Use and Comorbid Psychopathology: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yau, Y.H.C.; Crowley, M.J.; Mayes, L.C.; Potenza, M.N. Are Internet use and video-game-playing addictive behaviors? Biological, clinical and public health implications for youths and adults. Minerva Psichiatr. 2012, 53, 153–170. [Google Scholar]
  68. Huang, Q.; Li, Y.; Huang, S.; Qi, J.; Shao, T.; Chen, X.; Liao, Z.; Lin, S.; Zhang, X.; Cai, Y.; et al. Smartphone Use and Sleep Quality in Chinese College Students: A Preliminary Study. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liu, S.; Wing, Y.K.; Hao, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, B. The associations of long-time mobile phone use with sleep disturbances and mental distress in technical college students: A prospective cohort study. Sleep 2019, 42, zsy213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Kumar, V.A.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Brahadeeswari, H. Prevalence of smartphone addiction and its effects on sleep quality: A cross-sectional study among medical students. Ind. Psychiatry J. 2019, 28, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Lepp, A.; Barkley, J.E.; Karpinski, A.C. The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 31, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ihm, J. Social implications of children’s smartphone addiction: The role of support networks and social engagement. J. Behav. Addict. 2018, 7, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Li, C.; Liu, D.; Dong, Y. Self-Esteem and Problematic Smartphone Use Among Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model of Depression and Interpersonal Trust. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lachmann, B.; Sindermann, C.; Sariyska, R.Y.; Luo, R.; Melchers, M.C.; Becker, B.; Cooper, A.J.; Montag, C. The Role of Empathy and Life Satisfaction in Internet and Smartphone Use Disorder. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fischer-Grote, L.; Kothgassner, O.D.; Felnhofer, A. The impact of problematic smartphone use on children’s and adolescents’ quality of life: A systematic review. Acta Paediatr. 2021, 110, 1417–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wells, A. Emotional Disorders and Metacognition: Innovative Cognitive Therapy; John Wiley & Sons: Oxford, UK, 2001; pp. 6–7. [Google Scholar]
  77. Casale, S.; Musicò, A.; Spada, M.M. A systematic review of metacognitions in Internet Gaming Disorder and problematic Internet, smartphone and social networking sites use. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 2021, 28, 1494–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hamonniere, T.; Varescon, I. Metacognitive beliefs in addictive behaviours: A systematic review. Addict. Behav. 2018, 85, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Taybouta, R. Santé Mentale: La Tutelle Sonne l’alarme Sur la Pénurie de Psychiatres. L’Opinion Maroc—Actualité et Infos au Maroc et Dans le Monde. Available online: https://www.lopinion.ma/Sante-mentale-La-tutelle-sonne-l-alarme-sur-la-penurie-de-psychiatres_a29540.html (accessed on 16 January 2023).
Ijerph 20 02891 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the process of systematic literature search in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the process of systematic literature search in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
Ijerph 20 02891 g001
Ijerph 20 02891 g002 550
Figure 2. Relationships between PSU, its determinants, and mental health. r/Correlation coefficient and p/p-value.
Figure 2. Relationships between PSU, its determinants, and mental health. r/Correlation coefficient and p/p-value.
Ijerph 20 02891 g002
Table
Table 1. Main results of included studies.
Table 1. Main results of included studies.
SourceYear of StudyStudy DesignCountrySample SizeAge Range
(Mean Age ± SD)		% FemaleDefinitionsMean Score or PrevalenceAssessment Tool of PSUAssessment Tool of Depression, Anxiety, and StressOutcomes
Akbari M. et al., 2021 [22]Not reportedCross-sectionalIran61815–67 (27.31 ± 8.95)63.6PSU shares abstinence symptoms with substance and behavioral addictions31.51 ± 10.37SAS-SVHADSPositive correlation of anxiety and depression with PSU (p < 0.01), and depression predicted PSU level
Okasha T. et al., 2021 [23]2019–2020Cross-sectionalEgypt138018–26 (20.525 ± 1.576)55His inability to regulate his smartphone use affects other aspects of his life59.57%
(38.07 ± 12.95)		SAS-SVBDI
BAI		High significant correlation between PSU, depression, and anxiety
Barzegari S. et al., 2021 [24]Not reportedCross-sectionalIran28118–39
(20.9 ± 2.57)		55.2Excessive use of smartphones disrupts the daily life of users55.86 ± 14.17SPAIPHQ-9Positive correlation between PSU and depression (r = 0.47; p < 0.001)
Zeidan J. et al., 2021 [25]2020Cross-sectionalLebanon461(22.25 ± 2.87)70.9An inability to regulate one’s use
of the smartphone, which
creates problems with social and psychological levels		31.19 ± 8.80SAS-SVTEMPS-MPSU associated with
depression (r = 0.358) and anxiety (r = 0.27) (p < 0.001)
Buabbas A.J. et al., 2021 [26]Not reportedCross-sectionalKuwait199311–21 (15.28 ± 1.71)52.5Not reported64.6%SAS-SVDASS-21A correlation between PSU, stress (r = 0.42), anxiety (r = 0.29), and depression (r = 0.32) (p < 0.01)
Alageel A.A. et al., 2021 [27]Not reportedCross-sectionalMiddle
East		506≥2168.77Consist of compulsive behaviors, tolerance, withdrawal, and
functional impairment		51%SASPHQ9Association between PSU and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
(r = 0.408; p = 0.001)
Vally Z. et al., 2021 [28]2019–2020Cross-sectionalUnited Arab Emirates26118–36 (21.51 ± 2.99)65.1PSU is accompanied by functional impairment and symptoms that are observed in substance use disorders(35.17 ± 8.67) Female (32.53 ± 7.60)MaleSAS-SVDASS-21PSU related to depression (r = 0.18; p < 0.01) and
anxiety (r = 0.20; p < 0.01)
Sanusi S.Y. et al., 2021 [29]2017–2018Cross-sectionalJordan42017–27 (20.9 ± 1.62)75.5Not reported109.9 ± 23.83SASPSS-10A significant correlation between perceived stress and sleep quality and a significant correlation between PSU and sleep quality
Al Battashi N. et al., 2020
[30]		2019Cross-sectionalOman40418–26
(21.3 ± 1.6)		64.1Not reported83.9 ± 30.4SASDASSSignificant positive correlation between PSU, anxiety, and stress
El-Sayed Desouky D. et al., 2020
[31]		2017–2018Cross-sectionalSaudi Arabia1513(20.58 ± 1.71)54.5The excessive uncontrolled use of the smartphone, despite the awareness of the consequences and the presence of withdrawal symptoms59.51 ± 16.93PUMPTMAS,
BDI		PSU correlated with depression (r = 0.534; p < 0.001) and anxiety (r = 0.225; p < 0.001). Being female, of older age, or having depression or anxiety were risk factors for PSU
Derakhshanrad N. et al., 2020 [32]2018–2019Cross-sectionalIran1602(42.2 ± 8.2) SNPG,
(43.2 ± 8.8) APG 		64.1Not reported20.3%
(23.1% male, 18.8% female)		SAS-SVDASS-42PSU prevalence increases with depression, anxiety, and stress (p < 0.001)
Fallahtafti S. et al., 2020 [33]Not reportedCross-sectionalIran38912–1852Not reported30.85 ± 10.67SAS-SVKADSCorrelation between PSU and depression (r = 0.41; p < 0.001)
Turgeman L. et al., 2020 [34]2019Cross-sectionalIsrael14022–35 (26 ± 3.38)55.50Excessive use despite adverse consequences, withdrawal phenomena, and tolerance96.22 ± 33.56SASLSASPSU is associated with high levels of social anxiety
Mohamed S.M. et al., 2020 [35]Not reportedCross-sectionalEgypt320Not reported54.7Form of behavioral addiction,
including salience,
tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, lies, interpersonal and intrapersonal conflict, and relapse		95.8%SASHRSDSignificant positive correlation between PSU and depression
Shoval D. et al., 2020 [36]2019Cross-sectionalIsrael4019–30 (23 ± 2.4)100Not reportedNot reportedO.S.S.N.I.Q.STAI,
BDI-II		Significant positive correlation between night-time smartphone use on psychological well-being (trait anxiety and depression)
Vally Z. et al., 2020 [37]2019–2020Cross-sectionalUnited Arab Emirates45318–24 (20.32 ± 1.53)74.2Inability to control smartphone use, increasing tolerance, and withdrawal symptoms22.56 ± 5.03SABASDASS-21Positive and significant associations with depression, anxiety, and stress
Mosalanejad L. et al., 2019 [38]2014Cross-sectionalIran224Not reported82.14Not reported97.8%S.A.Q.DSIStress correlated with
with PSU (r = 0.269; p < 0.05)
Miri M. et al., 2019 [39]2018Cross-sectionalIran353(25.07 ± 6.29)75.5Not reported72.6% MD 2.4%
SD		PMPASSF-12, MCSInverse relationship between mental component and PSU (p < 0.001)
Saberi H. et al., 2019 [40]2016Cross-sectionalIran22218–50 (26.8 ± 5.82)73Not reported14.4%P.Q.D.M.S.Q.D.M.Stress had a significant relationship with PSU (p = 0.003)
Ranjbaran M. et al., 2019 [41]Not reportedCross-sectionalIran334(22.29 ± 3.50)79Not reported119.83 ± 43.53MPPUSGHQ-28Positive correlation between PSU and total score of GHQAnxiety is a significant predictor of PSU
Vally Z. et al., 2019 [42]2018Cross-sectionalUnited Arab Emirates35018–33 (20.7 ± 2.14)74.4Not reported29%
(47.14 ± 19.98).		MPPUS-10CESD-10Significant association between PSU and depression
Gender and depression are significant predictors of PSU
Alhassan A.A. et al., 2018 [43]2017Cross-sectionalSaudi Arabia935≥18 (31.7 ± 11)66.2Preoccupation, tolerance, lack of control, withdrawal, conflict, lies, excessive use, and loss of interest17%SAS-SVBDI IIA significant positive linear relationship between PSU and depression
Mahmoodi H. et al., 2018 [44]2015Cross-sectionalIran103413–2163.64Inability to regulate smartphone use, which involves negative consequences in daily life4.3%MPAIGHQPSU increases the odds of poor mental health by 3.19 times.
Lin C.Y. et al., 2018 [45]2017–2018Cross-sectionalIran3807(15.53 ± 1.2)46.9Complex and
composite behavior that causes functional impairment, lack of control, and/or dysfunctional coping		18%SABASDASSCorrelation between PSU and depression (r = 0.16; p < 0.01), anxiety (r = 0.49; p < 0.01), and stress (r = 0.32; p < 0.01)
Nahas M. et al., 2018 [46]Not reportedCross-sectionalLebanon20718–65
(12.5% 35–64) (27% 18–34)		52.5PSU is characterized by compulsive behavior, functional impairment, withdrawal, and tolerance20.2%MPPUS-10PHQ-2No correlation between PSU and psychological problems, such as depression
Zeeni N. et al., 2018 [47]Not reportedCross-sectionalLebanon24416–2163.93Not reportedNot reportedMTUASDASS-21Stress, anxiety, and depression are positively correlated with PSU
MatarBoumosleh J. et al., 2017 [48]2014–2015Cross-sectionalLebanon688(20.64 ± 1.88)47PSU is accompanied by preoccupation, tolerance, craving, impairment of daily life functions, and withdrawal.54.45 ± 15.65 male; 56.45 ± 14.26 femaleSPAIPHQ-2 GAD-2PSU is significantly associated with depression and anxiety
Venkatesh E. et al., 2017 [49]2016Cross-sectionalSaudi Arabia18923.28 male, 23.30 female46.56Overuse of smartphones disturbs users’ daily lives.71.96%SAS-SVI.Q.S.High-stress levels are significantly associated with PSU
Al-Dossary N.A. et al., 2017 [50]2016–2017Cross-sectionalSaudi Arabia493>15100Continuous consultation with smartphones despite adverse effects, loss of self-control, compulsive participation, and cravings58%SAS-SVBDI-PCPSU and depression were significantly and positively correlated
Hawi N.S. et al., 2017 [51]2016Cross-sectionalLebanon38117–27
(20.84 ± 1.92)		Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedSAS-SVBAIPSU increases the odds of having high anxiety by 4.706
Samaha M. et al., 2016 [52]Not reportedCross-sectionalLebanon24917–26
(20.96 ± 1.93)		45.8Not reported44.6%SAS-SVPSS-10Positive correlation
(r = 0.2; p < 0.002) between the risk of PSU and perceived stress
Tavakolizadeh J. et al., 2014 [53]2011Cross-sectionalIran70018–3044Not reported36.7%MPAIGHQ-28Significant association between PSU, mental health status (p = 0.001), depression, and anxiety
Babadi-
Akashe Z. et al., 2014 [54]		Not reportedCross-sectionalIran296Not reported49.90Mental impairment resulting from modern technology15.7%32-P.S.Q.SCL-90-RSignificant negative relationship between mental health and PSU (r = −0.383; p < 0.001).
SD/standard deviation; r/correlation coefficient; p/p-value; PSU/Problematic Smartphone Use; SAS-SV/Smartphone Addiction-Short Version; HADS/Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; BDI/Beck Depression Inventory; BAI/Beck Anxiety Inventory; SPAI/Smartphone Addiction Inventory; PHQ-9/Patient Health Questionnaire; TEMPS-M/Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego; DASS/Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale; SAS/Smartphone Addiction Scale; PSS-10/Perception of Stress Scale; PUMP/Problematic Use of Mobile Phone; TMAS/Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale; SNPG/Symptomatic Neck Pain Group; APG/Asymptomatic Participant Group; KADS/Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale; LSAS/Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale; HRSD/ Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression; O.S.S.N.I.Q./Objective and Subjective Smartphone Night-Time Use Independent Questionnaire; TAI/State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; BDI-II/Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition; SABAS/Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale; S.A.Q./Smartphone Addiction Questionnaire; DSI/Daily Stress Inventory; PMPAS/Mobile Phone Addiction Scale; MD/Moderate Dependence; SD/Severe Dependence; SF-12/Short Form 12 Questionnaire; MCS/Mental Component Summary; P.Q.D.M./Persian Questionnaire Designed by Mazaheri; S.Q.D.M./Second part of the Questionnaire Designed by Mazaheri; MPPUS/Mobile Phone Problem Usage Scale; GHQ-28/General Health Questionnaire-28; CESD-10/Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; MPAI/Mobile Phone Addiction Index; MTUAS/Media and Technology Usage; GAD-2/Generalized Anxiety Disorder; I.Q.S./Independent Questionnaire of Stress; BDI-PC/Beck Depression Inventory-Primary Care Version; 32-P.S.Q./32-Point Scale Questionnaire of Behavior Associated with Mobile Phone Use; and SCL-90-R/The Symptom Checklist-90-R.
Table
Table 2. Quality assessment of included cross-sectional studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Table 2. Quality assessment of included cross-sectional studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
SourceSelectionComparabilityExposureSubtotal AssessmentOverall
Representativeness of SampleAscertainment of ExposureSample SizeNon-RespondentsConfounders Are Controlled forAssessment of OutcomeStatistical TestS& TotalC# TotalE∑ Total
Akbari M. et al., 2021 [22]*** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Okasha T. et al., 2021 [23]*** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Barzegari S. et al., 2021 [24]**** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Zeidan J. et al., 2021 [25]**** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Buabbas A.J. et al., 2021 [26]**** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Alageel A.A. et al., 2021 [27]*** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Vally Z. et al., 2021 [28]*** * *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Sanusi S.Y. et al., 2021 [29]**** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Al Battashi N. et al., 2020 [30]**** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
El-Sayed Desouky D. et al., 2020 [31]*** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Fallahtafti S. et al., 2020 [33]*** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Turgeman L. et al., 2020 [34] ** * *ModerateGoodModerateModerate
Mohamed S.M. et al., 2020 [35]**** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Shoval D. et al., 2020 [36] ** *ModeratePoorModeratePoor
Vally Z. et al., 2020
[37]		 ** *ModeratePoorModeratePoor
Mosalanejad L. et al., 2019 [38]**** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Miri M. et al., 2019
[39]		**** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Saberi H. et al., 2019 [40] ** *ModeratePoorModeratePoor
Ranjbaran M. et al., 2019 [41]*** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Vally Z. et al., 2019
[42]		 ** * *ModerateGoodModerateModerate
Alhassan A. et al., 2018 [43]*** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Mahmoodi H. et al., 2018 [44]**** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Lin C.Y. et al., 2018
[45]		*** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Nahas M. et al., 2018 [46]**** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Zeeni N. et al., 2018
[47]		 ** *ModeratePoorModeratePoor
Matar Boumosleh J. et al., 2017 [48]**** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Venkatesh E. et al., 2017 [49] ** *ModeratePoorModeratePoor
Al-Dossary N.A. et al., 2017 [50]**** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Hawi N.S. et al., 2017 [51]*** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Samaha M. et al., 2016 [52]*** * *GoodGoodModerateModerate
Tavakolizadeh J. et al., 2014 [53]*** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
Babadi-Akashe Z. et al., 2014 [54]*** *GoodPoorModeratePoor
*–Study adequately filled criteria for this sub-domain; **–When the study uses valid instruments it is offered 2 stars for ascertainment of the exposure in the selection domain; S&–selection total; C#–comparability total; and E∑–exposure total.
Table
Table 3. Quality assessment of included cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Table 3. Quality assessment of included cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
SourceSelectionComparabilityExposureSubtotal AssessmentOverall
Representativeness of SampleAscertainment of ExposureSample SizeDemonstration That Outcome Aas Not Present at the Beginning of StudyConfounders Are Controlled forAssessment of OutcomeLength of Follow-UpFollow-Up RateS& TotalC# TotalE∑ Total
Cohort Studies
Derakhshanrad N. et al., 2020 [32]*** ** * GoodGoodModerateModerate
*–Study adequately filled criteria for this sub-domain; **–When the study uses valid instruments it is offered 2 stars for ascertainment of the exposure in the selection domain; S&–selection total; C#–comparability total; and E∑–exposure total.
Table
Table 4. Thresholds for Quality Assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale [55].
Table 4. Thresholds for Quality Assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale [55].
Quality RatingPoints in Selection DomainPoints in Comparability DomainPoints in Exposure Domain
Good≥3≥2≥2
Moderate2≥1≥2
Poor0–100–1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bouazza, S.; Abbouyi, S.; El Kinany, S.; El Rhazi, K.; Zarrouq, B. Association between Problematic Use of Smartphones and Mental Health in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042891

AMA Style

Bouazza S, Abbouyi S, El Kinany S, El Rhazi K, Zarrouq B. Association between Problematic Use of Smartphones and Mental Health in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(4):2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042891

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bouazza, Samira, Samira Abbouyi, Soukaina El Kinany, Karima El Rhazi, and Btissame Zarrouq. 2023. "Association between Problematic Use of Smartphones and Mental Health in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 4: 2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042891

APA Style

Bouazza, S., Abbouyi, S., El Kinany, S., El Rhazi, K., & Zarrouq, B. (2023). Association between Problematic Use of Smartphones and Mental Health in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042891

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop