Next Article in Journal
Experiences with Family Planning amongst Persons with Mental Health Problems: A Nationwide Patient Survey
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of Windlass Mechanism in the Lower Limb Using Inertial Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
Obesity and Its Association with Undiagnosed Diabetes Mellitus, High Blood Pressure and Hypercholesterolemia in the Malaysian Adult Population: A National Cross-Sectional Study Using NHMS Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relationship between Changes in Foot Arch and Sex Differences during the Menstrual Cycle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph20043075
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Joint and Ligament Structures of the Subtalar Joint and Degeneration of the Subtalar Articular Facet

by
Ryoya Togashi
1,
Mutsuaki Edama
1,2,*,
Mayuu Shagawa
1,
Haruki Osanami
1,
Hirotake Yokota
1,
Ryo Hirabayashi
1,
Chie Sekine
1,
Tomonobu Ishigaki
1,
Hiroshi Akuzawa
1,
Yuki Yamada
1,
Taku Toriumi
2 and
Ikuo Kageyama
2
1
Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3198, Japan
2
Department of Anatomy, School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Nippon Dental University, Niigata 951-1500, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 3075; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043075
Submission received: 22 December 2022 / Revised: 6 February 2023 / Accepted: 8 February 2023 / Published: 9 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2nd Edition of Treatment of Foot and Ankle Injury and Public Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the joint and ligament structures of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. We examined 50 feet from 25 Japanese cadavers. The number of articular facets, joint congruence, and intersecting angles were measured for the joint structure of the subtalar joint, and the footprint areas of the ligament attachments of the cervical ligament, interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL), and anterior capsular ligament were measured for the ligament structure. Additionally, subtalar joint facets were classified into Degeneration (+) and (−) groups according to degeneration of the talus and calcaneus. No significant relationship was identified between the joint structure of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. In contrast, footprint area of the ITCL was significantly higher in the Degeneration (+) group than in the Degeneration (−) group for the subtalar joint facet. These results suggest that the joint structure of the subtalar joint may not affect degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. Degeneration of the subtalar articular facet may be related to the size of the ITCL.

1. Introduction

Recently, subtalar joint instability was reported to occur in 10–80% of patients with chronic lateral ankle instability [1], but the problem is very difficult to diagnose [1,2]. Reasons for this include that the subtalar joint comprises anatomically complex structures, and subtalar joint instability is similar to chronic ankle instability [2,3]. In a report on a mouse model of combined injury to the talocrural and subtalar joints, cartilage degeneration of the talocrural and subtalar joints was observed at 12 weeks after the ligament was cut, suggesting the possibility of progression to osteoarthritis [4]. Elucidation of detailed anatomical findings is therefore imperative to allow accurate diagnosis and evaluation of subtalar joint instability.
Previous studies suggested that nerves, articular facets and ligaments, and muscles are involved in foot stability [5]. The anatomy of the subtalar joint involves multiple bony articular facets and ligaments [6]. Furthermore, since no muscles attach to the talus, movement of the talus is considered dependent on the forces applied to the joint [7]. These joint and ligament structures are thus considered to be highly involved in stability of the subtalar joint.
The relationships between joint structure of the subtalar joint facet (morphology of the articular facet, joint congruence, and intersecting angle) and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet were long investigated. In addition, the presence of degeneration of the subtalar articular facet was considered to indicate that the joint is unstable [8]. Previous studies using bleached bone revealed that a two-facet configuration for the morphology of the articular facet of the calcaneus, which involves continuity between the anterior facet (AF) and middle facet (MF) and isolation of the posterior facet (PF), is prone to degeneration of the articular facet [8,9]. In terms of joint congruence, the foot with congruence of the subtalar joint facet of the talus and calcaneus is considered more stable than the foot with incongruence of the subtalar joint facet of the talus and calcaneus [10]. The intersecting angle is the angle between the AF and MF of the calcaneus. The calcaneus with a two-facet configuration was reported to show a larger intersecting angle and more frequent degeneration of the subtalar articular facet than that with a three-facet configuration [8,9]. Intersecting angles may therefore also be related to degeneration of the subtalar articular facet [8,9]. However, recent reports on bones with residual soft tissue, including cartilage, found significant associations between morphology of the articular facet, joint congruence, or intersecting angle and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet [11], and agreement is lacking among previous studies.
The ligaments involved in the braking of the subtalar joint include the calcaneofibular ligament [12,13], cervical ligament (CL) [14,15], interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL) [15,16,17], and anterior capsular ligament (ACaL) [15,16,17]. The calcaneofibular ligament is reportedly important in braking the subtalar joint, but the CL, ITCL, and ACaL were not adequately studied. Jotoku et al. [16] considered that the size of the ligament may reflect mechanical demands on the involved structures. Ligamentous structures may thus be greater in area where the joint is unstable and loaded, but the relationship between joint and ligamentous structures of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet remains unclear.
The present study aimed to clarify relationships between joint and ligament structures of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. We hypothesized that the joint structure of the subtalar joint facet is independent of the presence or absence of degeneration of the subtalar articular facet and that ligaments are larger in feet with degeneration of the subtalar articular facet.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cadavers

This investigation examined 50 feet from 25 Japanese fixed cadavers (mean age at death, 79.4 ± 10.8 years; 26 sides from men, 24 sides from women, 25 right sides, and 25 left sides) donated to Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata. All cadavers were fixed in 10% formalin that was then replaced with alcohol. Inclusion criteria were no history of surgery on the foot or ankle joint. This investigation was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee at our institution (approval no. 18867-220720). This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was conducted after informed consent was obtained from all donor families.

2.2. Measurement Procedures

The dissection procedure consisted of amputation of the donor foot 10 cm above the ankle joint, followed by dissection of the skin, subcutaneous tissue, inferior extensor retinaculum, and lower leg muscle and tendons from the isolated foot specimen. In addition, to transect the talus at the subtalar joint, ligaments were cut in the following order: calcaneofibular ligament, lateral talocalcaneal ligament, CL, dorsal talonavicular ligament, ACaL, posterior talocalcaneal ligament, deltoid ligament, and ITCL. To disarticulate the calcaneus at the transverse tarsal joint, ligaments were cut in the following order: bifurcated ligament, dorsal calcaneocuboid ligament, plantar calcaneonavicular ligament, short plantar ligament, long plantar ligament, and plantar calcaneocuboid ligament.
Based on previous studies [8,11,18,19,20,21], the morphology of articular facets was classified by the number of articular facets in each talus and calcaneus according to the morphology of AF and MF. A morphology in which AF and MF were continuous and PF was isolated was considered a two-facet configuration, and a morphology in which AF, MF, and PF were isolated was considered a three-facet configuration (Figure 1). Joint congruence was evaluated based on whether the number of articular facets of the talus and calcaneus were the same or different, using the classification of articular facets described above [10]. Presence of the same number of articular facets for the talus and calcaneus was considered as congruence, while any difference was taken as incongruence (Figure 2). The intersecting angle was measured by placing a protractor (stainless steel protractor and angle finder; General Tools, Beijing, China) just above the articular facet of the calcaneus and measuring the angle between the AF and MF. Only a single measurement was taken (Figure 3).
The footprint area of the ligament attachment was used to evaluate ligament structure. Footprint areas were analyzed for CL, ITCL, and ACaL. These ligaments were carefully exposed from the disarticulated talus and calcaneus, and each ligament was detached from each bone. The detached areas were then colored with a pen to identify the footprint area for each ligament attachment. A three-dimensional (3D) scanner (EinScan Pro HD; SHINING 3D, Hangzhou, China) (specifications from the manufacturer: measurement precision, 0.04 mm) was used to create 3D models of the talus and calcaneus. The 3D model data were transferred to Geomagic Freeform 2021 design software (3D SYSTEMS), and curves were drawn on the boundaries of the footprint area using a pen-type device (Touch; 3D SYSTEMS). Afterward, footprint areas on the talar and calcaneal sides were calculated using Rhinoceros7 3D software (McNeel) (Figure 4). Footprint area was taken as the sum of footprint areas of the talus and calcaneus sides, with one measurement taken for each footprint area of each ligament.
Degeneration of the subtalar articular facet of the talus and calcaneus AF, MF, and PF was evaluated with a gross anatomical method based on the classification of Hirose et al. [22]. This method classifies joint facet degeneration into four grades: grade 1, no pathology; grade 2, swelling or fibrillation as a pre-degenerative change; grade 3, fissure or distinct erosion; or grade 4, cartilage defect. In addition, a previous study showed that osteophyte formation is observed in severe joint degeneration [23]. Therefore, in this study, in addition to the aforementioned grades 3 and 4, osteophyte formation was evaluated as a characteristic feature of degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. Feet with degeneration of any of the articular facets of the talus, articular facets of the calcaneus, or degeneration of the talus and calcaneus were assigned to the Degeneration (+) group. Feet without any degeneration of the talus or calcaneus were assigned to the Degeneration (−) group (Figure 5). The number of articular facets, joint congruence, intersecting angle, footprint area, and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet were evaluated and measured by one examiner.

2.3. Reliability of Measurements of Intersecting Angle and Footprint Area

The reliabilities of intersecting angle and footprint area measurements were examined for 10 feet from 5 Japanese fixed cadavers (mean age at death, 72.8 ± 15.9 years; 3 sides from men, 2 sides from women, 5 right sides, and 5 left sides) with no history of ankle or ankle joint surgery. Intersecting angles were measured as described above, and re-measurements were taken on the same day as the first measurement. The footprint area was measured by the method described above, and re-measurements were taken the next day or later.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28.0 (SPSS Japan, Tokyo, Japan). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to examine the reliability, and intra-examiner reliability (1,1) was calculated for each intersecting angle and footprint area.
Relationships between number of articular facets of the talus, joint congruence, and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet were examined using Fisher’s exact test. The relationship between the number of articular facets of the calcaneus and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet was examined using the Chi-square test. After performing the Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s test on the intersecting angle and footprint area, Welch’s t-test was used for the footprint area of the ACaL, and a two-sample t-test was used for the total footprint area of the CL, ITCL, and ACaL in comparisons of the Degeneration (+) and Degeneration (−) groups of the subtalar joint facet. Intersecting angle and footprint areas of CL and ITCL were compared between the Degeneration (+) and Degeneration (−) groups of the subtalar joint facet using the Mann–Whitney U test. The significance level was set at 5%.
Based on each the Fisher’s exact test, chi-square test, Welch’s t-test, two-sample t-test, and Mann–Whitney U test, effect size was calculated using the fourfold point correlation coefficient (φ) [24], Cohen’s d (d) [24], and rank biserial correlation (r) [25] and categorized as small (0.1), medium (0.3), or large (0.5) for φ and r, while for d it was classified as small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8) [24].

3. Results

3.1. Reliability of Measurements of Intersecting Angle and Footprint Area

ICC (1,1) values for measurement of the intersecting angle and footprint area were 0.989 and 0.975, respectively. According to the criteria of Landis et al. [26], an ICC greater than 0.81 reflects “almost perfect” reliability of the measurement. Therefore, the reliability of measurements of intersecting angle and footprint area in this study were almost perfect.

3.2. Joint and Ligament Structure and Degeneration of the Subtalar Articular Facet

In terms of the number of articular facets of the talus, 76% showed a two-facet configuration and 24% had a three-facet configuration. Joint congruence was seen in 88%, with 12% incongruent. Mean intersecting angle for the 50 feet was 138.4 ± 8.6° (Table 1). Mean footprint area for the 50 feet was 112.2 ± 43.6 mm2 for CL, 48.4 ± 24.3 mm2 for ITCL, and 48.3 ± 25.1 mm2 for ACaL. Total footprint area of the CL, ITCL, and ACaL was 208.9 ± 68.8 mm2 (Table 2). Degeneration of the subtalar articular facet was seen in 40% of feet (Degeneration (+) group), with 60% in the Degeneration (−) group.

3.3. Relationship between Joint and Ligament Structures and Degeneration of the Subtalar Articular Facet

In terms of joint structure, no significant differences were seen in number of articular facets of the talus and calcaneus, joint congruence, or intersecting angle between the Degeneration (+) and Degeneration (−) groups (number of articular facets of talus; p = 0.191, φ = 0.172, number of articular facets of calcaneus; p = 0.186, φ = 0.187, joint congruence; p = 0.544, φ= 0.05, and intersecting angle; p = 0.692, r = 0.07) (Table 1). In terms of ligament structure, only footprint area of the ITCL was significantly higher in the Degeneration (+) group compared to the Degeneration (−) group (p = 0.036, r = 0.297). No significant group differences between Degeneration (+) and Degeneration (−) groups were seen in footprint areas of the CL (p = 0.859, r = 0.025), ACaL (p = 0.403, d = 0.223), or total footprint area for the CL, ITCL, and ACaL (p = 0.929, d = 0.026) (Table 2).

4. Discussion

This study examined the relationship between joint and ligament structures of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet in Japanese fixed cadavers. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first study to examine the relationship between joint and ligament structure of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. Two main findings were obtained from this study. First, no significant relationship was apparent between joint structure of the subtalar joint (number of articular facets of the talus and calcaneus, joint congruence, and intersecting angle) and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. Second, in terms of the ligamentous structure of the subtalar joint, footprint area of the ITCL was significantly higher in the Degeneration (+) group than in the Degeneration (−) group.
The present study did not find any relationship between joint structure of the subtalar joint (number of articular facets of the talus and calcaneus, joint congruence, or intersecting angle) and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. These results are similar to those described by Kleipool et al. [11], who examined relationships between the number of articular facets, joint congruence, intersecting angle, and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet in bone specimens with residual soft tissue. Kleipool et al. [11] also considered that the degeneration of the subtalar articular facet observed in bleached bone may reflect secondary features of degeneration, while bone with remaining soft tissue may allow detection of early-stage degeneration of the articular cartilage. In this study, articular cartilage degeneration and osteophyte formation were analyzed as degeneration of the subtalar articular facet, which potentially allowed more comprehensive evaluation than in previous studies. In a review article [27] reporting risk factors for osteoarthritis, systemic factors such as sex, ethnicity, genetics, obesity, diet, bone density, and bone mass, and joint-level factors such as bone morphology, muscle strength, joint alignment, occupation, and sports activities, and joint injury were reported as risk factors for osteoarthritis. The degeneration of the subtalar articular facet observed in the present study was potentially induced by influences other than the joint structure of the subtalar joint.
In the present study, among the ligamentous structures of the subtalar joint, only the footprint area of the ITCL showed significantly higher values in the Degeneration (+) group compared to the Degeneration (−) group for the subtalar joint facet. Previous studies suggested that the CL, ITCL, and ACaL in the subtalar joint are each important for stability of the subtalar joint [12,15,16]. In respect of the CL, a previous study suggests that the larger dimensions of the CL and the location more distant from the subtalar joint axis, compared to the ITCL, suggest a more important function of this ligament in the stability of the subtalar joint [15]. The main findings of this study reported that the location of the ITCL located at the center of the subtalar joint, and structural features of ITCL are similar to those of the cruciate ligaments of the knee [28]. The main function of the ITCL was considered to be the connection of the talus and calcaneus and maintenance of the sub-talar joint axis [28,29]. The function of ACaL is not yet clarified in detail. Furthermore, Jotoku et al. [16] consider that the size of the ligament may reflect the result of mechanical demands. Therefore, in unstable joints, it was expected that the ligament structure would adapt to the mechanical loading. In conclusion, the higher ITCL attachment surface area in the degenerated (+) group at the subtalar joint surface was not due to repetitive internal rotation of the subtalar joint, but rather to the adaptation of the ligament structure due to loading that caused malalignment of the talus and calcaneus. The increased load on the subtalar joint surface due to the loading that caused malalignment of the talus and calcaneus potentially caused the degeneration of the subtalar joint surface.
Several limitations to this study need to be kept in mind. The first is that the lifestyles, medical history, and history of sprains for donors remained unknown. In previous studies, osteoarthritis was reported to show many risk factors [27]. Thickening of the anterior talofibular ligament was also shown to occur after a lateral ankle sprain [30]. We therefore cannot rule out the possibility that the lifetime contributions of donor lifestyle, lower extremity alignment, medical history, and history of sprains potentially caused changes in ligament structure and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. Second, we did not include the calcaneofibular ligament or inferior extensor retinaculum in our study. The calcaneofibular ligament and inferior extensor retinaculum were suggested as potentially important for stability of the subtalar joint [12,31,32]. However, the structure and function of the CL, ITCL, and ACaL in the subtalar joint were not fully investigated. We therefore prioritized evaluation of the CL, ITCL, and ACaL in this study. Future studies should include the calcaneofibular ligament and inferior extensor retinaculum to evaluate, in detail, the structures and functions of the subtalar joint. Third, this study was conducted only on Japanese fixed cadavers. In a previous study, the morphology of the subtalar articular facet was shown to vary markedly between ethnicities [33]. Such differences may have similar effects on ligament structure. The fourth point is that we did not examine the degeneration of the subtalar articular facet from a histological point of view. A previous study classified joint facet degeneration into four grades: grade 1, no pathology; grade 2, swelling or fibrillation as a pre-degenerative change; grade 3, fissure or distinct erosion; or grade 4, cartilage defects [22]. In addition, a previous study showed that osteophyte formation is observed in severe joint degeneration [23]. Therefore, in this study, in addition to the aforementioned grades 3 and 4, osteophyte formation was evaluated as a characteristic feature of degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. However, the method used in this study did not allow for a detailed study of the degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. Therefore, detailed studies including histological methods are needed in the future. The fifth point is that no biomechanical studies were conducted. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between joint and ligament structures of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. Since ancient times, the relationship between morphology of the subtalar articular facet and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet is reported along with the interpretation that the presence of degeneration of the subtalar articular facet indicates joint instability [8]. The same interpretation was used in the present study. However, the relationship between subtalar joint motion and variations in morphology of the subtalar articular facet, as well as detailed function of the ligaments of the subtalar joint, are not yet clear. Detailed investigations using biomechanical methods are clearly needed.

5. Conclusions

In this study, no significant relationship was identified between joint structure and the presence of degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. In terms of ligament structure, only footprint area of the ITCL was significantly higher in the Degeneration (+) group than in the Degeneration (−) group of the subtalar joint facet. The present results suggest that the joint structure of the subtalar joint may not affect degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. In the ligament structure of the subtalar joint, the footprint area of the ITCL was significantly larger in the group with degeneration of the subtalar joint facet, suggesting that degeneration of the subtalar joint facet may be related to the size of the ITCL. Further studies using biomechanical methods are needed to clarify the relationship between subtalar joint motion and variations in subtalar articular facet morphology, as well as the detailed functions of the ligaments of the subtalar joints.

Author Contributions

R.T. contributed to conceptualization, data and formal analysis, investigation and methodology and writing—original draft; M.E. contributed to conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision and writing—original draft; M.S. and H.O. contributed to validation and writing—review and editing; H.Y., R.H., C.S., T.I., H.A., Y.Y. and T.T. contributed to writing—review and editing of the manuscript; I.K. supervised the study, contributed to writing—original draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number JP22K19739 and a Grant-in-Aid program from Niigata University of Health and Welfare.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Niigata University of Health and Welfare (approval no. 18867-220720).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the families of all subjects.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank those anonymous individuals who generously donated their bodies so that this study could be performed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Michels, F.; Clockaerts, S.; Van Der Bauwhede, J.; Stockmans, F.; Matricali, G. Does subtalar instability really exist? A systematic review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020, 26, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pereira, B.S.; Andrade, R.; Espregueira-Mendes, J.; Marano, R.P.C.; Oliva, X.M.; Karlsson, J. Current Concepts on Subtalar Instability. Orthop. J. Sport. Med. 2021, 9, 23259671211021352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aynardi, M.; Pedowitz, D.I.; Raikin, S.M. Subtalar Instability. Foot Ankle Clin. 2015, 20, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, P.; Chen, K.; Wang, S.; Hua, C.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J. A mouse model of ankle-subtalar joint complex instability induced post-traumatic osteoarthritis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2021, 16, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McKeon, P.O.; Hertel, J.; Bramble, D.; Davis, I. The foot core system: A new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function. Br. J. Sport. Med. 2015, 49, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Budny, A. Subtalar joint instability: Current clinical concepts. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. 2004, 21, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stagni, R.; Leardini, A.; O’Connor, J.J.; Giannini, S. Role of Passive Structures in the Mobility and Stability of the Human Subtalar Joint: A Literature Review. Foot Ankle Int. 2003, 24, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Drayer-Verhagen, F. Arthritis of the subtalar joint associated with sustentaculum tali facet configuration. J. Anat. 1993, 183, 631–634. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Madhavi, C.; Madhuri, V.; George, V.M.; Antonisamy, B. South Indian calcaneal talar facet configurations and osteoarthritic changes. Clin. Anat. 2008, 21, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Badalahu; Qin, B.; Luo, J.; Zeng, Y.; Fu, S.; Zhang, L. Classification of the subtalar articular surface and its matching situation: An anatomical study on Chinese subtalar joint. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2020, 42, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kleipool, R.P.; Vuurberg, G.; Stufkens, S.A.S.; van der Merwe, A.E.; Oostra, R.-J. Bilateral symmetry of the subtalar joint facets and the relationship between the morphology and osteoarthritic changes. Clin. Anat. 2020, 33, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pellegrini, M.J.; Glisson, R.R.; Wurm, M.; Ousema, P.H.; Romash, M.M.; Nunley, J.A., 2nd; Easley, M.E. Systematic Quantification of Stabilizing Effects of Subtalar Joint Soft-Tissue Constraints in a Novel Cadaveric Model. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2016, 98, 842–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, L.; Gollhofer, A.; Lohrer, H.; Dorn-Lange, N.; Bonsignore, G.; Gehring, D. Function of ankle ligaments for subtalar and talocrural joint stability during an inversion movement—An in vitro study. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2019, 12, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Edama, M.; Takabayashi, T.; Inai, T.; Hirabayashi, R.; Ikezu, M.; Kaneko, F.; Matsuzawa, K.; Kageyama, I. Morphological features of the cervical ligament. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2020, 42, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Michels, F.; Matricali, G.; Vereecke, E.; Dewilde, M.; Vanrietvelde, F.; Stockmans, F. The intrinsic subtalar ligaments have a consistent presence, location and morphology. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021, 27, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jotoku, T.; Kinoshita, M.; Okuda, R.; Abe, M. Anatomy of ligamentous structures in the tarsal sinus and canal. Foot Ankle Int. 2006, 27, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, S.Y.; Hou, Z.D.; Zhang, P.; Li, H.L.; Ding, Z.H.; Liu, Y.J. Ligament structures in the tarsal sinus and canal. Foot Ankle Int. 2013, 34, 1729–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jung, M.-H.; Choi, B.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Han, C.S.; Lee, J.S.; Yang, Y.C.; Cho, B.P. Types of subtalar joint facets. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2015, 37, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bruckner, J. Variations in the human subtalar joint. J. Orthop. Sport. Phys. Ther. 1987, 8, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nozaki, S.; Watanabe, K.; Katayose, M. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of the talus: Implication for variations in kinematics of the subtalar joint. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2017, 39, 1097–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cho, H.-J.; Kwak, D.-S.; Kim, I.-B. Analysis of movement axes of the ankle and subtalar joints: Relationship with the articular surfaces of the talus. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 2014, 228, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hirose, K.; Murakami, G.; Kura, H.; Tokita, F.; Ishii, S. Cartilage degeneration in talocrural and talocalcaneal joints from Japanese cadaveric donors. J. Orthop. Sci. 1999, 4, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kellgren, J.H.; Lawrence, J.S. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1957, 16, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fritz, C.O.; Morris, P.E.; Richler, J.J. Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2012, 141, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Landis, J.R.; Koch, G.G. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 1977, 33, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vina, E.R.; Kwoh, C.K. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Literature update. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2018, 30, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tochigi, Y.; Amendola, A.; Rudert, M.J.; Baer, T.E.; Brown, T.D.; Hillis, S.L.; Saltzman, C.L. The Role of the Interosseous Talocalcaneal Ligament in Subtalar Joint Stability. Foot Ankle Int. 2004, 25, 588–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tochigi, Y.; Takahashi, K.; Yamagata, M.; Tamaki, T. Influence of the Interosseous Talocalcaneal Ligament Injury on Stability of the Ankle-Subtalar Joint Complex—A Cadaveric Experimental Study. Foot Ankle Int. 2000, 21, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liu, K.; Gustavsen, G.; Royer, T.; Wikstrom, E.A.; Glutting, J.; Kaminski, T.W. Increased ligament thickness in previously sprained ankles as measured by musculoskeletal ultrasound. J. Athl. Train. 2015, 50, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stephens, M.M.; Sammarco, G.J. The stabilizing role of the lateral ligament complex around the ankle and subtalar joints. Foot Ankle 1992, 13, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weindel, S.; Schmidt, R.; Rammelt, S.; Claes, L.; Campe, A.V.; Rein, S. Subtalar instability: A biomechanical cadaver study. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2010, 130, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bunning, P.S.; Barnett, C.H. A comparison of adult and foetal talocalcaneal articulations. J. Anat. 1965, 99, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Ijerph 20 03075 g001 550
Figure 1. Procedure for classifying the number of subtalar articular facets. (a,c) Plantar view of the right talus, (b,d) dorsal view of the right calcaneus. M: medial side; L: lateral side. A morphology in which the anterior facet (AF) and middle facet (MF) are continuous, and the posterior facet (PF) is isolated is considered as a two-facet configuration. A morphology in which AF, MF, and PF are all isolated is considered as a three-facet configuration.
Figure 1. Procedure for classifying the number of subtalar articular facets. (a,c) Plantar view of the right talus, (b,d) dorsal view of the right calcaneus. M: medial side; L: lateral side. A morphology in which the anterior facet (AF) and middle facet (MF) are continuous, and the posterior facet (PF) is isolated is considered as a two-facet configuration. A morphology in which AF, MF, and PF are all isolated is considered as a three-facet configuration.
Ijerph 20 03075 g001
Ijerph 20 03075 g002 550
Figure 2. Procedure for assessing joint congruence. (a,c) Plantar aspect of the right talus; (b,d) dorsal aspect of the right calcaneus. Joint congruence was evaluated based on whether the number of articular facets of the talus and calcaneus were the same or different based on the classification of the number of the articular facets. The same number of articular facets for both talus and calcaneus were considered to represent congruence (a,b) and a different number represented incongruence (c,d).
Figure 2. Procedure for assessing joint congruence. (a,c) Plantar aspect of the right talus; (b,d) dorsal aspect of the right calcaneus. Joint congruence was evaluated based on whether the number of articular facets of the talus and calcaneus were the same or different based on the classification of the number of the articular facets. The same number of articular facets for both talus and calcaneus were considered to represent congruence (a,b) and a different number represented incongruence (c,d).
Ijerph 20 03075 g002
Ijerph 20 03075 g003 550
Figure 3. Procedure for measuring the intersecting angle. (a) Dorsal view of the right calcaneus; (b) Anteromedial view of the right calcaneus. The intersecting angle was measured by placing the protractor just above the articular facet of the calcaneus and measuring the angle between the AF and MF.
Figure 3. Procedure for measuring the intersecting angle. (a) Dorsal view of the right calcaneus; (b) Anteromedial view of the right calcaneus. The intersecting angle was measured by placing the protractor just above the articular facet of the calcaneus and measuring the angle between the AF and MF.
Ijerph 20 03075 g003
Ijerph 20 03075 g004a 550Ijerph 20 03075 g004b 550
Figure 4. Procedure for measuring footprint area. (a) Site of attachment of the cervical ligament, interosseous talocalcaneal ligament, and anterior capsular ligament: right foot, dorsal view; (b) after detaching ligaments from bones, detached areas were colored with a pen to identify the footprint for each ligamentous attachment; (c) a three-dimensional (3D) scanner was used to create 3D models of the talus and calcaneus; (d) a curve was drawn on the boundaries of the footprint using a pen-type device; and (e) the footprint area was then calculated using Rhinoceros7 3D software.
Figure 4. Procedure for measuring footprint area. (a) Site of attachment of the cervical ligament, interosseous talocalcaneal ligament, and anterior capsular ligament: right foot, dorsal view; (b) after detaching ligaments from bones, detached areas were colored with a pen to identify the footprint for each ligamentous attachment; (c) a three-dimensional (3D) scanner was used to create 3D models of the talus and calcaneus; (d) a curve was drawn on the boundaries of the footprint using a pen-type device; and (e) the footprint area was then calculated using Rhinoceros7 3D software.
Ijerph 20 03075 g004aIjerph 20 03075 g004b
Ijerph 20 03075 g005a 550Ijerph 20 03075 g005b 550
Figure 5. Procedure for assessing degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. (a,c) Plantar view of the right talus; (b,d) dorsal view of the calcaneus. arrow: areas showing degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. M: medial side; L: lateral side. Joints showing degeneration of any of the articular facets of the talus, calcaneus, or both were assigned to the Degeneration (+) group. Joints with no degeneration of the talus or calcaneus were assigned to the Degradation (−) group.
Figure 5. Procedure for assessing degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. (a,c) Plantar view of the right talus; (b,d) dorsal view of the calcaneus. arrow: areas showing degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. M: medial side; L: lateral side. Joints showing degeneration of any of the articular facets of the talus, calcaneus, or both were assigned to the Degeneration (+) group. Joints with no degeneration of the talus or calcaneus were assigned to the Degradation (−) group.
Ijerph 20 03075 g005aIjerph 20 03075 g005b
Table
Table 1. Relationship between joint structure of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet.
Table 1. Relationship between joint structure of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet.
DegenerationTotal
(+)(−)
Number of joint facets (n)
 Talar two-facet configuration172138
 Talar three-facet configuration3912
 Calcaneal two-facet configuration151732
 Calcaneal three-facet configuration51318
Joint congruence (n)
 Congruent182644
 Incongruent246
Intersecting angle (°)137.8 ± 6.7138.7 ± 9.7138.4 ± 8.6
Congruent: specimens with the same number of articular facets for both talus and calcaneus. Incongruent: specimens with a different number of articular facets for the talus and calcaneus. Degeneration (+): specimen with degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. Degeneration (−): specimens without degeneration of the subtalar articular facet.
Table
Table 2. Relationship between ligament structure of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet.
Table 2. Relationship between ligament structure of the subtalar joint and degeneration of the subtalar articular facet.
DegenerationTotal
(+)(−)
Footprint area (mm2)
 CL110.1 ± 46113.6 ± 42.8112.2 ± 43.6
 ITCL55.0 ± 21.144.1 ± 25.7 *48.4 ± 24.3
 ACaL44.9 ± 17.950.5 ± 29.148.3 ± 25.1
 Total footprint of CL, ITCL, ACaL210.0 ± 61.8208.2 ± 74.2208.9 ± 68.8
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation. CL: cervical ligament; ITCL: interosseous talocalcaneal ligament; ACaL: anterior capsular ligament. Degeneration (+): specimen with degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. Degeneration (−): specimen without degeneration of the subtalar articular facet. * p = 0.036 vs. Degeneration (+) for the subtalar articular facet.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Togashi, R.; Edama, M.; Shagawa, M.; Osanami, H.; Yokota, H.; Hirabayashi, R.; Sekine, C.; Ishigaki, T.; Akuzawa, H.; Yamada, Y.; et al. Relationship between Joint and Ligament Structures of the Subtalar Joint and Degeneration of the Subtalar Articular Facet. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3075. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043075

AMA Style

Togashi R, Edama M, Shagawa M, Osanami H, Yokota H, Hirabayashi R, Sekine C, Ishigaki T, Akuzawa H, Yamada Y, et al. Relationship between Joint and Ligament Structures of the Subtalar Joint and Degeneration of the Subtalar Articular Facet. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(4):3075. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Togashi, Ryoya, Mutsuaki Edama, Mayuu Shagawa, Haruki Osanami, Hirotake Yokota, Ryo Hirabayashi, Chie Sekine, Tomonobu Ishigaki, Hiroshi Akuzawa, Yuki Yamada, and et al. 2023. "Relationship between Joint and Ligament Structures of the Subtalar Joint and Degeneration of the Subtalar Articular Facet" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 4: 3075. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043075

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop