Next Article in Journal
SPACEE Protocol: “Spiritual Care Competence” in PAlliative Care Education and PracticE: Mixed-Methods Research in the Development of Iberian Guidelines
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation Therapy on Reducing the Degree of Pain Experienced by Individuals with Low Back Pain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Influencing Factors of Satisfaction with the Use of Public Health Internet Platform: Evidence from Ding Xiang Doctor (DXY) Internet Medical Platform
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph20043503
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Interplay among Empathy, Vicarious Trauma, and Burnout in Greek Mental Health Practitioners

by
Kalliope Kounenou
1,*,
Antonios Kalamatianos
2,
Panagiota Nikoltsiou
3 and
Ntina Kourmousi
1
1
Department of Education, School of Pedagogical & Technological Education, 15122 Marousi, Greece
2
Department of Education, School of Education, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 2417, Cyprus
3
Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, 38221 Volos, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 3503; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043503
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 4 February 2023 / Accepted: 10 February 2023 / Published: 16 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Challenges and Crucial Topics for 2030 Public Health)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background. Mental health professionals are at risk of experiencing vicarious trauma and burnout as a consequence of the nature of their work. Studies and scholars so far have demonstrated that empathy interacts directly with burnout, and they imply an interaction with vicarious trauma. However, research has paid little attention to the interplay among vicarious trauma, empathy, and burnout in mental health professionals who practice psychotherapy. This study examines the interplay between mental health professionals’ (those practicing psychotherapy) vicarious trauma and empathy and investigates the ways they contribute to burnout. Methods. The sample consisted of 214 mental health professionals (32 males and 182 females), working in the public and private sectors. Specific instruments were administered online to the sample: (a) an improvised demographic questionnaire (age, gender, education, specialty, years of experience, years of supervision); (b) the Counselor Burnout Inventory, validated for the Greek population by Kounenou et al.; (c) the Vicarious Trauma Scale; and (d) the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. Results. Correlation analysis showed that empathy and vicarious trauma were positively related to burnout. Moreover, multiple regression analysis revealed that supervision, empathy, and, to a greater degree, vicarious trauma have a significant impact on burnout. Conclusion. Unlike relative research on burnout, gender and work experience did not seem to play a significant role in the prediction of burnout in the present study. Several suggestions for future studies, as well as implications for mental health practitioners, are discussed.

1. Introduction

There is a great interest in the issue of burnout among health and mental health professionals [1,2,3,4]. Burnout induces hopelessness, anger, and cynicism in human service professionals [5]. Burnout constitutes a stable, negative, work-related mental state of “normal” individuals, primarily characterized by exhaustion [6] and accompanied by stress, reduced effectiveness, and motivation, as well as the development of dysfunctional attitudes and behaviors at work [7]. It also entails depersonalization, cynicism, and a lack of personal achievement. The causes of burnout, in general, are related to the stressful factors in the work context and the attitude towards work [8]. Job demands have been associated with physical and psychological costs for healthcare professionals [9]. Therapists who have more experience seem to be less likely to cope with burnout compared to less experienced people [10]. Moreover, lack of supervision is a factor associated with burnout [11]. Burnout has also been related to vicarious trauma [12].
Vicarious trauma refers to the indirect trauma that may occur to people working with traumatized clients, such as health professionals, and includes nightmares, phobic thoughts, images that suddenly appear in the mind, suspicion of others’ intentions [13], decreased empathy [14], and, on a professional level, a loss of efficiency in providing therapeutic services while professional satisfaction decreases [15]. Therapists who experience vicarious trauma deal with difficulties regarding their own emotion regulation and their personal relationships [16]. Therapists who face vicarious trauma via their clients quite often find themselves experiencing or re-experiencing traumatic conditions on their own [17]. Taking the above into consideration, experiencing vicarious trauma has been found to be one of the highest work risks for therapists’ mental health [18]. It may even change therapists’ values and beliefs [19]. Pearlman and Saakvitne [20], as cited in Rauvola, Vega, and Lavigne [21], characterized it as the transformation of the therapists’ inner experience as a result of their empathic engagement with their clients and the traumatic material they carry. Vicarious trauma in therapists has been connected to women [22], little work experience [23], and a lack of supervision [24].
Empathy is the ability to understand and share the emotions, thoughts, and behavior of another person [25]. It helps the therapist understand the client’s internal frame of reference both accurately and by taking into account the emotional features associated with it as if it were their own, but forgetting the “as” [26]. By being empathetic, the therapist offers quality care and treatment and simultaneously is able to protect one’s personal mental health [27]. Empathy has been found to be higher in women in comparison to men and related to an interest in a counseling-type career [28].
The positive relationship between empathy and burnout has been documented by many studies [29,30]. This may be due to the professionals’ need to invest in the patients’ painful emotions, thus driving themselves to exhaustion [31]. The therapists’ compassion leads to depersonalization in order to protect themselves emotionally and spiritually. This depersonalization, however, does not bring relief to the therapists and reduces their satisfaction associated with offering help. Thus, the therapists become ineffective because of their inability to connect. Furthermore, their very willingness to remain in an empathic alliance with a client exposes the client to stress, which can lead to burnout [32]. Due to the lack of reciprocity in these relationships, professionals report feeling depleted of emotional resources, which leads to “emotional exhaustion.” Burnout is also related to vicarious trauma [12], since providing psychological assistance to people who have experienced trauma results in mental health professionals repeatedly encountering detailed narratives of traumatic events. In addition, they witness the emergence of strong emotional responses from their clients [18].
The literature review so far shows that, except for school counselors’ emotional exhaustion [33], there is limited research regarding burnout in Greek mental health professionals. To the best of our knowledge, no research has been conducted so far regarding vicarious trauma and empathy in relation to burnout among mental health professionals who practice psychotherapy in Greece.
Grounded in past research, we hypothesized that all the aforementioned variables would be significantly correlated. Similarly, the study’s goal was to investigate the relationship between demographic characteristics and them.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

The recruitment of the sample was carried out by posting an announcement on a master’s degree student’s personal account as well as via specific groups on social media, such as Facebook. Thus, participants responded online to the anonymous survey questionnaires implemented via the Google Forms platform. Greek psychologists, psychiatrists, and other professionals that provided psychotherapy treatment to others were included in the sample. Participants who lived abroad, although they had Greek nationality, were excluded from the sample. Before completing the questionnaire, the participants had to sign a consent form that described the purpose of the research, the procedures to be followed, and the researcher’s obligation to comply with the code of ethics. The research was approved by the University of Thessaly’s Research and Ethics Committee because the majority of the work was done as part of an MSc thesis. Overall, 214 people took part, including 182 women (85%) and 32 men (15%). The highest percentages, regarding the demographics, were among mental health practitioners between 24 and 30 years of age (30.4%), psychologists and psychotherapists (43%), and professionals with graduate studies (64%). All demographic information is provided in Table 1.

2.2. Materials

The following self-report scales were used to collect the survey data: Participants reported their age, gender, marital status, specialty, years of experience, and years of supervision in an improvised demographics questionnaire.
The degree to which professionals experienced occupational burnout was measured by the counselor burnout inventory (CBI) [34], validated by Kounenou et al. [35], for which the participants had to state the frequency with which they encounter burnout on a 5-point scale (1 = “never” to 5 = “always”). It includes 20 items (e.g., “I feel exhausted due to my work as a counselor/therapist”). Cronbach’s alpha for the counselor burnout inventory in this study was 0.882. Indirect trauma was assessed by the vicarious trauma scale (VTS) [36], which contains 8 statements (e.g., “My job involved exposure to distressing materials and experiences”) ranging from 1 (“does not represent me at all”) to 7 (“represents me perfectly”). A higher score indicates greater levels of vicarious trauma [37]. Additionally, 3 questions applied to Adams, Matto, and Harrington’s [38] research on vicarious trauma were used, which the research subjects had to answer, marking their response on a 3-point scale where 1 corresponded to “not at all” and 3 to “very much.” Cronbach’s alpha for the vicarious trauma scale in this study was 0.780.
To assess empathy, participants were asked to respond to the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Professionals Version (JSE-HP) [39], translated and validated by Tziala [40]. It is a reliable and valid self-report scale [41]. It consists of 20 statements (“Because people are different, it is almost impossible for me to see things from my patients’ perspectives”), in which the participants indicate their degree of agreement or disagreement on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly agree,” 7 = “strongly disagree”). Cronbach’s alpha for the Jefferson Scale of physician empathy (HP) in this study was 0.811.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

We checked for linearity and found no deviation. We tested for normality; the criteria for skewness and kurtosis were met, and the indexes did not exceed the absolute values of 3 and 10, respectively [42,43]. There were no missing values. The correlations between the measured variables, means, and standard deviations were calculated. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the contribution of various factors that have been shown to be associated with burn-out [44], such as gender, marital status, years of supervision, years of work experience, vicarious trauma, and empathy. SPSS-21 was used for the above analyses.

3. Results

The strongest, statistically significant correlation was between burnout and vicarious trauma. We also came across non-significant correlations, such as those between vicarious trauma and empathy or years of supervision, as well as between empathy, years of supervision, and work experience. Means, standard deviations, and correlations among the psychological variables and the demographic factors are displayed in Table 2.
In addition, multiple regression analysis was used to test if demographic factors, vicarious trauma, and empathy significantly predicted burnout. Initially, it was found that neither gender (β = 0.001, ns) nor marital status (β = 0.077, ns) significantly predicted burnout. The slopes of the regression lines were not statistically significant (F(1, 212) = 0.00, ns and F(2, 211) = 0.62, ns, respectively). The demographic factors explained 0.06% of the burnout variance. In the next step, years of supervision significantly contributed to the burnout prediction (β = −0.186, p < 0.01), and the slope of the regression line was statistically significant, F(3, 210) = 2.952, p < 0.05. Years of supervision explained an additional 3.5% of the burnout variance. Next, years of work experience did not significantly predict burnout (β = −0.071, ns), F(4, 209) = 2.397, p = 0.051, whereas empathy significantly predicted burnout (β = 0.151, p < 0.05), F(5, 208) = 2.960, p < 0.05. These factors explained additional 0.3% and 2.3%, respectively, of the burnout variance (β = 0.592, p < 0.001), F(6, 207) = 23.280, p < 0.001. All the variables explained 40.3% of the burnout variance (Table 3).
Finally, we performed several mediation and moderation analyses, using vicarious trauma, empathy, years of supervision, and years of work experience as independent variables, mediators or moderators interchangeably, and burnout as a dependent variable, but we did not discover statistically significant results.

4. Discussion

The present study aimed to determine the nature of the connection between burnout, vicarious trauma, and empathy, as well as other demographic factors, among mental health practitioners practicing psychotherapy, on the grounds that research in this field is limited, especially in Greece. It revealed that these psychological variables have a positive and statistically significant relationship with respect to burnout on the one hand and vicarious trauma and empathy on the other.
Initially, gender and marital status were found to be unrelated to therapist burnout. This finding was consistent with previous studies [45,46], while others [47,48] have found women therapists to report a higher level of emotional exhaustion than male colleagues. Maslach and Jackson [49] have found a negative correlation between marriage and the occurrence of burnout.
Furthermore, burnout was strongly and positively related to vicarious trauma. This finding supports the findings of Rupert et al. [46], who discovered that uncontrolled and unresolved, chronic stress and psychological distress, symptoms that may be caused by indirect trauma, aggravated burnout symptoms using the jobs demands and resources model (JD-R) [50] and the conservation of resources (COR) model [51].
Burnout was positively related to empathy as well, but weakly. Emotional empathy may be the key to a therapist helping people, but it is also the skill that makes mental health professionals sensitive to the “cost of care” [31].
Moreover, it was found that therapists who have more years of supervision seem to be less likely to confront burnout, probably because during discussions with their colleagues they develop coping strategies to deal with stressors compared to therapists who have no supervision. The preventive role of supervision against burnout among mental health professionals has been documented by other researchers as well [52].
The current study has various limitations, such as the opportunity sample, the cross-sectional design, which makes it difficult to draw conclusions on causal relationships, and the heterogeneity of the group of mental health professionals with respect to their studies, their therapy training, their years of experience, and the patients they treat. For example, therapists working with personality disorders, particularly borderline personality disorder, may be more prone to experiencing burnout [53]. Moreover, this research was conducted in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, and this made access to mental health centers or other agencies difficult. However, our study has several strengths as well. First of all, it can lead to useful results concerning the treatment of traumatized clients. Furthermore, patients treated by burned-out therapists may have poorer outcomes than patients treated by non-burned-out therapists [54], and burned-out mental health professionals may become less involved in the therapeutic process, emotionally distant from their clients, and generally lower the quality of their work [46,49].
As for future directions, burnout can be associated with other factors related to vicarious trauma, such as workload, a controversial professional role, and authoritarian leadership that can make a therapist vulnerable [22]. Future research can also focus on the ways therapists can cope with burnout. Clinicians have been found to reduce their investment in the relationship with their clients as a form of self-protection [55]. It is this characteristic of burnout that Maslach [6] termed “depersonalization.” The findings of the current research indicate the importance of vicarious trauma and empathy in affecting mental health professionals’ burnout. This may contribute to significant developments in the field of solutions for therapists that deal with such difficulties.

5. Conclusions

It was discovered that vicarious trauma and years of supervision greatly influence the occurrence of burnout in Greek mental health professionals practicing psychotherapy. Empathy was also found to have an impact on therapists’ burnout. However, no other demographic factor was found to be predictive of burnout. These results confirm that vicarious trauma and empathy lead to therapists’ vulnerability, while supervision seems to provide a solution to their burnout symptoms.
Currently, this research continues with the addition of individual variables, such as mental health professionals’ personality and self-compassion, although it would be rather interesting to conduct the same research in various cultural settings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.K. and P.N.; methodology, K.K. and P.N.; software, A.K. and K.K.; validation, K.K., A.K.; formal analysis, K.K. A.K. and P.N.; investigation, K.K. and P.N.; resources, K.K., P.N. and N.K.; data curation, K.K. and P.N.; writing—original draft preparation, K.K. and A.K.; writing—review and editing, N.K.; visualization, K.K. and A.K.; supervision, K.K.; project administration, K.K.; funding acquisition, K.K., A.K. and N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was funded by a program managed by the Special Account of ASPETE entitled “Publication & dissemination actions of the projects’ research team” (code n. 80190), whose scientific director is Kalliope Kounenou.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of University of Thessaly.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the mental health practitioners who took part in this study, as well as the MSc in Counselling Psychology and Counseling in Special-General Education & Health, Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, for academic support and Research & Ethics Approval.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acker, G.M. Burnout among mental health care providers. J. Soc. Work 2012, 12, 475–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gupta, S.; Paterson, M.L.; Lysaght, R.M.; von Zweck, C.M. Experiences of burnout and coping strategies utilized by occupational therapists. Can. J. Occup. Ther. 2012, 79, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lloyd, C.; King, R. A survey of burnout among Australian mental health occupational therapists and social workers. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2004, 39, 752–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Seibold, S.; Schuh, H.; Kostara, S. Anxiety, Harassment, and Burnout in Workplace; Papazisi: Athens, Greece, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pompili, M.; Rinaldi, G.; Lester, D.; Girardi, P.; Ruberto, A.; Tatarelli, R. Hopelessness and suicide risk emerge in psychiatric nurses suffering from burnout and using specific defense mechanisms. Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2006, 20, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Maslach, C. Burnout: The Cost of Caring; Prentice Hall: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schaufeli, W.B.; Enzmann, D. The Burnout Companion to Study and Practice: A Critical Analysis; Taylor & Francis: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  8. Glasberg, A.L.; Eriksson, S.; Norberg, A. Burnout and ‘stress of conscience’ among healthcare personnel. J. Adv. Nurs. 2007, 57, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bakker, A.; Le Blanc, P.; Schaufeli, W. Burnout contagion among nurses who work at intensive care units. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005, 51, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kop, N.; Euwema, M.; Schaufeli, W. Burnout, job stress, and violent behaviour among Dutch police officers. Work Stress 1999, 13, 326–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Webster, L.; Hackett, R.K. Burnout and leadership in community mental health systems. Adm. Policy Ment. 1999, 26, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Everall, R.D.; Paulson, B.L. Burnout and secondary traumatic stress: Impact on ethical behavior. Can. J. Couns. 2004, 38, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  13. McCann, I.; Pearlman, L. Vicarious traumatization: A framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims. J. Trauma. Stress 1990, 3, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lanier, B.A.; Carney, J.S. Practicing counselors, vicarious trauma, and subthreshold PTSD: Implications for counselor educators. Prof. Couns. 2019, 9, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sui, X.-C.; Padmanabhanunni, A. Vicarious trauma: The psychological impact of working with survivors of trauma for South African psychologists. J. Psychol. Afr. 2016, 26, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Catanese, S.A. Traumatized by association: The risk of working sex crimes. Fed. Probat. 2010, 74, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sodeke-Gregson, E.A.; Holttum, S.; Billings, J. Compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress in UK therapists who work with adult trauma clients. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 2013, 4, 21869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Robinson-Keilig, R.A. Secondary traumatic stress and disruptions to interpersonal functioning among mental health therapists. J. Interpers. Violence 2014, 29, 1477–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huggard, P.; Law, J.; Newcombe, D. A systematic review exploring the presence of vicarious trauma, compassion fatigue, and secondary traumatic stress in alcohol and other drug clinicians. Australas. J. Disaster Trauma Stud. 2017, 21, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pearlman, L.A.; Saakvitne, K.W. Trauma and the Therapist: Countertransference and Vicarious Traumatization in Psychotherapy with Incest Survivors; W W Norton & Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rauvola, R.S.; Vega, D.M.; Lavigne, K.N. Compassion fatigue, secondary traumatic stress, and vicarious traumatization: A qualitative review and research agenda. Occup. Health Sci. 2019, 3, 297–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Molnar, B.E.; Meeker, S.A.; Manners, K.; Tieszen, L.; Kalergis, K.; Fine, J.E.; Hallinan, S.; Wolfe, J.D.; Wells, M.K. Vicarious trau-matization among child welfare and child protection professionals: A systematic review. Child Abuse Negl. 2020, 110, 104679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aafjes-van Doorn, K.; Békés, V.; Prout, T.A.; Hoffman, L. Psychotherapists’ vicarious traumatization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy 2020, 12, S148–S150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tabor, P.D. Vicarious traumatization: Concept analysis. J. Forensic Nurs. 2011, 7, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Malikiosi-Loizou, M. A critical view to empathy. Psychology 2003, 10, 298–309. (In Greek) [Google Scholar]
  26. Rogers, C.R. The Necessary and Sufficient Conditions of Therapeutic Personality Change. J. Consult. Psychol. 1957, 21, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bika, A. Mental Resilience, Emotion Regulation, and Empathy in Mental Health Professionals. Master’s Thesis, Greek Open University, Athens, Greece, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Harton, H.C.; Lyons, P.C. Gender, empathy, and the choice of the Psychology major. Teach. Psychol. 2003, 30, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ferreira, S.; Afonso, P.; Ramos, M.R. Empathy and burnout: A multicentre comparative study between residents and specialists. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2020, 26, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Truchot, D.; Roncari, N.; Bantégnie, D. Burnout, compliance du patient et retrait psychologique chez les médecins généralistes: Une étude exploratoire [Burnout, patient compliance and psychological withdrawal among GPs: An exploratory study]. Encéphale 2011, 37, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Figley, C.R. Compassion fatigue: Psychotherapists’ chronic lack of self-care. J. Clin. Psychol. 2002, 58, 1433–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wolf, E.K.; Alpert, J.L. Psychoanalysis and child sexual abuse: A review of the post-Freudian literature. Psychoanal. Psychol. 1991, 8, 305–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kounenou, Κ.; Koumoundourou, G. Greek career counselors’ burnout, counselling competencies and the role of personality. In Proceedings of the 16th Panhellenic Conference in Psychological Research, Thessaloniki, Greece, 10–14 May 2017. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee, S.; Baker, C.R.; Ho Cho, S.; Heckathorn, D.E.; Holland, M.W.; Newgent, R.A.; Ogle, N.T.; Powell, M.L.; Quinn, J.J.; Wallace, S.L.; et al. Development and initial psychometrics of the counselor burnout inventory. Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev. 2007, 40, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kounenou, K.; Gekimisi, S.; Nanopoulos, P.; Tsitsas, G. The psychometric properties of the Counselor Burnout Inventory in Greek school counsellors. J. Psychol. Couns. Sch. 2018, 33, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vrklevski, L.P.; Franklin, J. Vicarious Trauma Scale. Traumatology 2008, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aparicio, E.M.; Michalopoulos, L.M. An examination of the psychometric properties of the vicarious trauma scale in a sample of licensed social workers. Health Soc. Work 2013, 38, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Adams, K.B.; Matto, H.C.; Harrington, D. The Traumatic Stress Institute Belief Scale as a measure of vicarious trauma in a national sample of clinical social workers. Fam. Soc. 2001, 82, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hojat, M.; Gonnella, J.S.; Nasca, T.J.; Mangione, S.; Vergare, M.; Magee, M. Physician empathy: Definition, measurement and relationship to gender and specialty. Am. J. Psychiatry 2002, 159, 1563–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Tzialla, N. Study of Empathy in Greek Dental Postgraduate Students. Master’s Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Faculty of Health Sciences School of Dentistry, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ouzouni, C.; Nakakis, K. An exploratory study of student nurses’ empathy. J. Health Sci. 2012, 6, 534–552. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sposito, V.A.; Hand, M.L.; Skarpness, B.O. On the efficiency of using the sample kurtosis in selecting optimal Lp estimators. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 1983, 12, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Orcan, F. Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean comparison. Int. J. Assess. Tool. Educ. 2020, 7, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Maslach, C.; Schaufeli, W.; Leiter, M. Job burnout. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 397–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Leiter, M.P.; Harvie, P.L. Burnout among mental health workers: A review and a research agenda. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 1996, 42, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rupert, P.A.; Morgan, D.J. Work setting and burnout among professional psychologists. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 2005, 36, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Arvay, M.J.; Uhlemann, M.R. Counsellor stress in the field of trauma: A preliminary study. Can. J. Couns. 1996, 30, 193–210. [Google Scholar]
  48. Maslach, C. A multidimensional theory of burnout. In Theories of Organizational Stress; Cooper, C.L., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998; pp. 68–81. [Google Scholar]
  49. Maslach, C.; Jackson, S.E. The measurement of experienced burnout. J. Occup. Behav. 1981, 2, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Demerouti, E.; Bakker, A.; De Jonge, J.; Jansenn, P.; Schaufeli, W. Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and contact. Scand. J. Work Environ. Heath 2001, 4, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Halbesleben, J.R.B.; Neveu, J.P.; Paustian-Underdahl, S.C.; Westman, M. Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J. Manag. 2014, 40, 1334–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Iosim, I.; Runcan, P.; Dan, V.; Nadolu, B.; Runcan, R.; Petrescu, M. The role of supervision in preventing burnout among professionals working with people in difficulty. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 19, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Baird, S.; Jenkins, S.R. Vicarious traumatization, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout in sexual assault and domestic violence agency staff. Violence Vict. 2003, 1, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. McCarthy, W.C.; Frieze, I.H. Negative aspects of therapy: Client perceptions of therapists’ social influence, burnout, and quality of care. J. Soc. Issues 1999, 1, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schaufeli, W.B.; van Dierendonck, D. The construct validity of two burnout measures. J. Organ. Behav. 1993, 14, 631–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Demographics.
Table 1. Demographics.
Demographic Characteristicsn (%)
Age group, years
24–3065 (30.4)
31–3647 (22.0)
37–4248 (22.4)
43–4825 (11.7)
49–5418 (8.4)
55+11 (5.1)
Gender
Male32 (15.0)
Female182 (85.0)
Marital status
Single43 (20.1)
In a relationship 95 (44.4)
Married76 (35.5)
Occupation-Specialty
Psychologists81 (38.0)
Psychiatrists6 (2.8)
Psychologists-Psychotherapists92 (43.0)
Psychiatrists-Psychotherapists11 (5.1)
Psychotherapists, unrelated to psychology and psychiatry24 (11.2)
Studies
Private college/Public university undergraduate61 (28.5)
Graduate137 (64.0)
PhD16 (7.5)
Table
Table 2. Correlations between measured variables.
Table 2. Correlations between measured variables.
VariablesMeanSDCBIVTSJSE-HPYears of SupervisionYears of Work Experience
CBI2.010.571
VTS2.280.540.60 ***1
JSE-HP3.900.360.16 *0.08 ns1
Years of supervision2.950.925−0.19 **−0.02 ns−0.04 ns1
Years of work experience2.221.487−0.15 *−0.16 **−0.01 ns0.51 ***1
Note. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns: non-significant, CBI: counselor burnout inventory; VTS: vicarious trauma scale; JSE-HP: Jefferson scale of empathy-health professionals version.
Table
Table 3. Prediction of burnout by demographic and psychological measures.
Table 3. Prediction of burnout by demographic and psychological measures.
Regression Coefficients
UnstandardizedStandardized
Ββt
Step 1 (ΔR2 = 0.000)
Gender		0.0010.0010.011 ns
Step 2 (ΔR2 = 0.006)
Marital status		0.0400.0771.116 ns
Step 3 (ΔR2 = 0.040)
Years of supervision		−0.115−0.186−2.752 **
Step 4 (ΔR2 = 0.044)
Years of work experience		−0.027−0.071−0.863 ns
Step 5 (ΔR2 = 0.066)
Empathy		0.2400.1512.242 *
Step 6 (ΔR2 = 0.403)
Vicarious trauma		0.6240.59210.80 ***
Note. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. ns: nonsignificant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kounenou, K.; Kalamatianos, A.; Nikoltsiou, P.; Kourmousi, N. The Interplay among Empathy, Vicarious Trauma, and Burnout in Greek Mental Health Practitioners. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043503

AMA Style

Kounenou K, Kalamatianos A, Nikoltsiou P, Kourmousi N. The Interplay among Empathy, Vicarious Trauma, and Burnout in Greek Mental Health Practitioners. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(4):3503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043503

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kounenou, Kalliope, Antonios Kalamatianos, Panagiota Nikoltsiou, and Ntina Kourmousi. 2023. "The Interplay among Empathy, Vicarious Trauma, and Burnout in Greek Mental Health Practitioners" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 4: 3503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043503

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop