Next Article in Journal
Patient Experiences and Perspectives of Their Decision-Making to Accept Lung Transplantation Referral: A Qualitative Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Perceptions towards the COVID-19 Pandemic during Different Lockdown Levels among International Students in Taiwan
Previous Article in Journal
Salt-Containing Recipes in Popular Magazines with the Highest Circulation in the United States Do Not Specify Iodized Salt in the Ingredient List
Previous Article in Special Issue
Outcomes of Elderly Patients Hospitalized with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron B.1.1.529 Variant: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Precautionary Tale: Individual Decision Making in the Time of COVID-19

1
Department of Psychiatry, MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA
2
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
3
Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7650, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(5), 4597; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054597
Submission received: 20 January 2023 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 1 March 2023 / Published: 5 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19 Pandemics and Public Health)

Abstract

Precaution taking is an important part of managing COVID-19 and has been since the start of the pandemic. Guided by the Health Belief Model, two studies conducted during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic aimed to identify possible individual difference predictors of precautionary actions. Study 1 was an online, cross-sectional study using 763 adults aged 20–79 years old. Study 2, a 30-day daily diary study, examined daily precautions in 261 persons over the age of 55 years old. Study 1 and Study 2 indicated that COVID-19 knowledge predicted precautionary behaviors. Multilevel models from Study 2 indicated that daily increases in in-person interactions and leaving home were associated with decreases in precautions, but increases in disruption to routine were associated with increases in precautions. In both studies, including concurrent and lagged models in Study 2, significant interactions between information seeking and perceived risk suggested higher information seeking was related to higher precautions for those who consider themselves low risk. Findings highlight the burden of daily precautions and potentially modifiable factors of engagement in precautions.
Keywords: decision making; perceived risk; health; daily diary; COVID-19 decision making; perceived risk; health; daily diary; COVID-19

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pearman, A.; Hughes, M.L.; Coblenz, C.W.; Smith, E.L.; Neupert, S.D. A Precautionary Tale: Individual Decision Making in the Time of COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 4597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054597

AMA Style

Pearman A, Hughes ML, Coblenz CW, Smith EL, Neupert SD. A Precautionary Tale: Individual Decision Making in the Time of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(5):4597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054597

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pearman, Ann, MacKenzie L. Hughes, Clara W. Coblenz, Emily L. Smith, and Shevaun D. Neupert. 2023. "A Precautionary Tale: Individual Decision Making in the Time of COVID-19" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 5: 4597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054597

APA Style

Pearman, A., Hughes, M. L., Coblenz, C. W., Smith, E. L., & Neupert, S. D. (2023). A Precautionary Tale: Individual Decision Making in the Time of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054597

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop