The Lived Self-Care Experiences of Patients Undergoing Long-Term Haemodialysis: A Phenomenological Study
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Dear,, It is good study involved ((The lived self-care experiences of patients undergoing long-term haemodialysis: A phenomenological study )),, but to accept it ,, it needs Minor Corrections :
1- The abstract needs more clarification for results
2- the disccusion needs explanation of results ..
3- also the conclusions are not clear ,, please add more explanation for conclusions
4- add updated references ( 2023 and 2022)
5- The results need to more citation by references ,,
6- I accepted paper after Minor Corrections
Author Response
Thanks for your constructive review for my paper. here are the answer for your comments.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear Reviewer
Thank you for your constructive review for the paper. Here is the feedback for your comments.
Thanks and regards.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
Psychological and lifestyle aspects of long-term hemodialysis (HD) are extremely important and sometimes underestimated by clinicians, who are mainly focused on patients’ compliance and treatment outcomes. The authors made an attempt to specifically analyze self-care experiences of extremely long-term HD survivors, which could help to improve our understanding of non-medical factors prolonging life of HD patients.
The presented article is interesting and carefully prepared, therefore, I suggest it to be accepted for publication after some revisions:
1) It is well known that socioeconomic factors could make a huge impact on the mental experiences of HD patients, including possibility to travel and work part-time (this is almost impossible for manual jobs), diet variety etc. This aspect is very little discussed in the manuscript, only information about patients’ gender, age and family status is presented.
2) Conclusions are too short and limited to rather general statements; its is not discussed how the research results could improve clinical practices and care standards for HD patients.
Author Response
Dear reviewer
Thank you for your constructive review for the paper. here are some feedback for your comments.
Thanks and regards.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx