Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Evaluation of Spatial Accessibility of Various Urban Medical Services Based on Big Data of Outpatient Appointments
Previous Article in Journal
How Did People with Prediabetes Who Attended the Diabetes Prevention Education Program (DiPEP) Experience Making Lifestyle Changes? A Qualitative Study in Nepal
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Primary Care—A Cohort Study from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP)

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(6), 5051; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065051
by Lukasz Mateusz Falkhamn 1, Gunilla Stenberg 2, Paul Enthoven 3 and Britt-Marie Stålnacke 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(6), 5051; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065051
Submission received: 31 January 2023 / Revised: 8 March 2023 / Accepted: 9 March 2023 / Published: 13 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Health Care Sciences & Services)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I would like to thank the authors for their work on a worthy topic.  Overall I find the manuscript well thought out from a methodology standpoint as well as written in an easily digestible format for the readership. 

One area I would like to see more information about is the differences in sites and the those that made up the teams.  You mention that teams could be made up of different individuals depending on the location however, the details regarding this are lacking.  I wonder if you don't see differences in some of the variables you report based on team members, location, training of team members etc.  This seems like a valuable part of the treatment and may be considered a confounding variable of sorts. 

Perhaps mentioning this in both the methods as well as the limitations or discussion would be helpful if you are unable to break it down from a data standpoint. 

I also appreciate the conclusion section regarding the strengthening of how follow ups are handled. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop