Next Article in Journal
Ultrastructural Alterations of the Glomerular Filtration Barrier in Fish Experimentally Exposed to Perfluorooctanoic Acid
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics of Fatal, Pedestrian-Involved, Motor Vehicle Crashes in West Virginia: A Cross-Sectional and Spatial Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Impact of Mode of Birth, and Episiotomy, on Postpartum Sexual Function in the Medium- and Longer-Term: An Integrative Systematic Review

1
Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
2
Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, 9713 GL Groningen, The Netherlands
3
Midwifery Science, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4
Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
5
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
6
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(7), 5252; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075252
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 5 March 2023 / Accepted: 14 March 2023 / Published: 24 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Women's Health)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Sexual function can be affected up to and beyond 18 months postpartum, with some studies suggesting that spontaneous vaginal birth results in less sexual dysfunction. This review examined the impact of mode of birth on sexual function in the medium- (≥6 months and <12 months postpartum) and longer-term (≥12 months postpartum). (2) Methods: Literature published after January 2000 were identified in PubMed, Embase and CINAHL. Studies that compared at least two modes of birth and used valid sexual function measures were included. Systematic reviews, unpublished articles, protocols and articles not written in English were excluded. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. (3) Results: In the medium-term, assisted vaginal birth and vaginal birth with episiotomy were associated with worse sexual function, compared to caesarean section. In the longer-term, assisted vaginal birth was associated with worse sexual function, compared with spontaneous vaginal birth and caesarean section; and planned caesarean section was associated with worse sexual function in several domains, compared to spontaneous vaginal birth. (4) Conclusions: Sexual function, in the medium- and longer-term, can be affected by mode of birth. Women should be encouraged to seek support should their sexual function be affected after birth.

1. Introduction

Birth can have profound effects on women’s lives, including on their sexual function in the longer-term. Decreased sexual functioning is an important indicator of maternal morbidity [1], and determinant of quality of life in women of reproductive age; sexual dysfunction rates were found to be up to 64% at six months postpartum, and that approximately 6.4% of women experienced no physical pleasure in their sexual relationships at 18 months postpartum [2,3,4].
The American Psychiatric Association defines sexual function as “a person’s ability to respond sexually or to experience sexual pleasure” [5]. Up until the publication of DSM-V, women’s and men’s sexual responses were thought to follow the same linear pattern (desire, arousal, pattern) [6]. It is now recognised that different genders differ in their sexual function [7]. Additionally, it is recognised that what is considered ‘normal’ sexual function varies widely among women because of the complex nature of women’s sexuality, which can be affected by psychological, physical and cultural factors [8].
An important aspect that may impact sexual function is mode of birth, which can be categorised into spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with an episiotomy, assisted vaginal birth, planned caesarean section or emergency caesarean section. Data from the Euro-Peristat study (2016) indicated that 66.2% of all births in the EU were spontaneous vaginal births, 7.5% were assisted vaginal births, 10.7% were planned caesarean sections, and 12.9% were emergency caesarean sections [9,10]. Additionally, the rate of episiotomy ranged from 16% to 38% in most countries in Europe, with Portugal, Poland, Romania and Cyprus having the highest rates [11]. More recent data show that the rate of intervention during birth is continuing to increase: in 2020/2021, 33.5% of all births in NHS hospitals in England were caesarean sections [12]. Increasing rates of caesarean sections can also be seen over the years in other European countries [13]. In North America, the caesarean section rate is 31.6%; in Latin America and the Caribbean it is 42.8%; on the continent of Africa, it is 9.2%; however, northern Africa has a caesarean section rate of 32.0%, whilst it is 5.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa [14]. In Brazil, caesarean section rates are higher than in many other countries (55.9%), with particularly high rates being observed in the private healthcare sector (72%) [15,16,17].
Despite the significant amount of literature surrounding the impact of mode of birth on postpartum sexual functioning in the short-and longer-term, there is no consensus on the association between mode of birth and sexual functioning. Several cohort studies have shown that women who have a spontaneous vaginal birth (with an intact perineum) are more likely to resume vaginal sex by six to eight weeks postpartum compared to women who have an episiotomy, an assisted vaginal birth or a caesarean section [18,19]. Another cohort study showed that, by two months postpartum, 43% of women who had a caesarean section had at least one problem whilst attempting intercourse, and that assisted vaginal birth was significantly associated with perineal pain persisting after two months postpartum when compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery [20]. However, a cohort study did not show an association between mode of birth and sexual function in the short term [21]. A cohort study showed that 35% of women suffered loss of sexual desire up to 8–9 months after birth [22]. At 16 years postpartum, a cohort study showed that, on average, women who had caesarean section had an increased frequency of sexual problems when compared to other modes of birth; however, no difference was seen in the prevalence of sexual problems when comparing spontaneous and assisted vaginal birth [23]. However, it should be noted that other factors, such as menopause, mental health and physical health, could impact postpartum sexual function in the longer-term [24,25,26,27]. Sexual (dys)function prior to pregnancy, depressive symptoms, breastfeeding status, parity and perineal tears are other potential confounders [3,20,28,29,30,31,32,33].
Systematic reviews on the association between mode of birth and postpartum sexual function have been undertaken in 2004, 2010, 2020 and 2022 [3,34,35,36]. Results from these systematic reviews varied: a review showed that caesarean section was protective of sexual function compared to vaginal birth [34], another showed a strong association between assisted vaginal birth and worse sexual function when compared to other modes of birth [35], whilst others showed no relationship between mode of birth and postpartum sexual function [3,36]. However, these reviews had several methodological shortcomings: the studies included in the reviews by Sayasneh et al. (2010) and Hicks et al. (2004) had a high heterogeneity, and they were included regardless of whether they assessed sexual functioning with a validated measure [34,35]; the review by Gutzeit et al. (2020) lacked a clear methodology, reporting no inclusion and exclusion criteria [3]; the review by Nikolaidou et al. (2022) included all available studies on the association between type of birth and female sexual function up until 12 months following the birth using established, validated tools [36], but they did not consider episiotomy in their review, which is a common birth intervention that can have a major impact on sexual functioning [11,19].
Sexual dysfunction that continues beyond six months postpartum is more likely to have an impact on maternal wellbeing: women with impaired sexual function are more likely to score worse in all quality of life domains; and women at six months postpartum with worse sexual functioning scores are more likely to have worse scores for general health and physical functioning [2,4]. Therefore, the aim of this integrative review was to examine the impact of different modes of birth, as well as episiotomy, on sexual functioning, beyond six months postpartum in the medium-term (≥6 months and <12 months postpartum) and longer-term (≥12 months postpartum).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

Relevant studies were identified using PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases, and searches were limited to studies published between January 2000 and February 2023. Keywords in the search included: mode of birth (e.g., vaginal birth, caesarean section), episiotomy, postpartum, and sexual function. A detailed search strategy is presented in the Appendix A. The reference lists of the studies that were selected for inclusion were also manually searched for additional studies. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020212746).

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Both quantitative and mixed method studies were eligible for inclusion in this review, including cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, case–control studies and randomised controlled trials. Systematic reviews, unpublished results or studies, protocols, studies not written in English or written prior to 2000 were excluded. In order to be included, studies must have compared at least two different modes of birth. To facilitate clinical usability of this review, as well as provide a useful framework for this review and other studies in the future, specific modes of birth were the main focus of the review. Therefore, studies that compared data on spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy, assisted vaginal birth, planned (elective) caesarean section and emergency caesarean section were included. The secondary focus of this review were comparisons that incorporated multiple modes of birth in each category, as some studies combine multiple modes of birth into one group. Therefore, studies that compared non-specific mode of birth groups such as vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy or assisted vaginal birth), vaginal birth with breech presentation, and caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) were included. Only episiotomy was considered, rather than other perineal trauma, as it is an intervention performed (or not) by a health care professional during birth, whereas other perineal trauma happens as a result of birth. In order to ensure comparability of the studies, only studies that used a validated sexual function measure were included.

2.3. Valid Measures of Sexual Function

All of the measures of sexual function used in the studies included in this review are self-reported measures. The measures contain questions/statements, to which women report on their sexual function, by rating their sexual function using a numeric/Likert scale. A measure was considered to be a valid measure for sexual function if it has undergone psychometric evaluation and its psychometric properties were found to be acceptable.
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) consists of 19 items embedded in six domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain). The theoretical range is 2.0 to 36.0, with higher total FSFI-scores indicating better sexual functioning [37]. A cut off of ≤26.55 is commonly used to report a dichotomous FSFI-score indicating sexual dysfunction [38]. The FSFI has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to be good in women with varying parity [37,39].
The Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS) for women consists of 28 items embedded in seven subscale domains (non-communication, infrequency, dissatisfaction, avoidance, non-sensuality, vaginismus, anorgasmia). The raw score is converted into a transformed score ranging between one and nine, which can be used to produce a diagnostic profile. A transformed score greater than or equal to 5 indicates sexual dysfunction [40,41,42]. The GRISS has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to be good [40].
The Sexual Health Outcomes in Women Questionnaire (SHOW-Q) has 12 items embedded in four subscales (satisfaction, orgasm, desire, pelvic problem interference). It was designed to be used on a diverse range of women, including women in same sex relationships, women who are sexually active without a partner, and sexually inactive women. All items are scored on a scale from zero to 100. For three of the subscales (satisfaction, orgasm, desire), higher scores represent better sexual function. For the final subscale (pelvic problem interference), higher scores indicate worse sexual function. After reversal of the pelvic problem interference scores, all items are totalled for an overall score with a theoretical range of zero to 400 [43]. Lower total scores indicate worse sexual functioning [43,44]. The SHOW-Q has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to acceptable in women with varying parity [44].
The Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ) has 21 items embedded in three scales (pleasure, discomfort and habit). Each question has weighted loadings to create factor scores, with high scores in the pleasure domain representing high pleasure, and low scores in the discomfort domain representing low levels of discomfort. The habit domain is a single question and the value given as the answer is the score for this domain, with more habitual regular sexual activity resulting in higher scores. Each question is rated using a four-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, with the total score ranging from 0 to 30 [45,46]. The SAQ has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to be good [47,48].
The Sexual Function Questionnaire (SFQ28) has 28 items embedded in eight domains (desire, arousal (sensation), arousal (lubrication), arousal (cognitive), orgasm, pain, enjoyment, partner (questions regarding women’s opinion of their sexual life with their partner)). Lower scores indicate increased probability of sexual dysfunction. Overall total score has a theoretical range of 14 to 170. Each domain is scored separately, with different ranges of scores indicating sexual dysfunction. For all domains, lower scores indicate worse sexual functioning [49,50]. The SFQ28 has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to be good [51].
The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) is a 12-item questionnaire that measures three domains: behavioural–emotive, physical and partner/related (questions regarding women’s opinion of their sexual life with their partner). Each item is graded on a five-point Likert scale from always (zero) to never (zero). The behavioural–emotive items are reversely scored. Higher scores indicate better sexual functioning, with a maximum total score of 48 [52,53]. The PISQ-12 has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to be good in women with varying parity [52,54].

2.4. Classification of the Medium- and Longer-Term Studies

Results from the sexual function measures were categorised into medium- and longer-term: studies that collected data at beyond or equal to six months postpartum and at less than 12 months postpartum were classified as medium-term, whereas those that collected data at beyond or equal to 12 months postpartum were classified as longer-term.

2.5. Selection of the Studies

Studies that were identified as potentially eligible for inclusion were exported to Rayyan, a systematic review reference management tool. Duplicates were removed. When deciding which studies to include, two researchers (AMF, NG) independently screened the titles and abstracts. From there, full texts were evaluated for their eligibility by the two researchers, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any inconsistency between researchers on whether studies should be included or not were discussed further in order to come to an agreement. If agreement could not be reached, a third author (LP) was involved in the discussion. Information on study design, location of study, descriptive characteristics of participants, types of modes of birth, the measure of sexual function, and the results of those studies related to mode of birth and sexual function was then extracted.

2.6. Quality Assessment

Quality of the included studies was assessed by two researchers (AMF, NG) independently using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) [55]. The NOS tool was “developed to assess the quality of non-randomised studies” for use in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The NOS has three domains: selection, comparability and exposure. The selection domain covers representativeness of the studied population in the community, selection of the non-exposed cohort, ascertainment of exposure, and demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at start of the study [55]. The comparability domain assesses control for confounding variables. The outcome domain covers assessment of the outcome, length of the follow up and adequacy of follow up. Each domain contains several questions with multiple choice answer options. A maximum of one star can be awarded for each question [55]. We adapted the NOS, as self-reported measures of sexual function were considered the gold standard for assessing sexual measures by the authors, since sexual function can only be reported by the person experiencing it. The NOS was adapted by awarding a star for the assessment of outcome question, in the outcome domain.
A scoring system developed by Sharmin et al. (2017) was used to group the included studies by quality score: a study was rated good quality if it scored three or four stars in selection, one or two stars in comparability, and two or three stars in outcomes. A study was rated fair quality if it scored two stars in selection, one or two stars in comparability and two or three stars in outcome. A study was rated poor quality if it scored zero or one star in selection, or zero stars in comparability, or zero or one star in outcomes [56,57]. Tabular explanations of the domains and the scoring system are presented in Tables S1 and S2 of the Supplementary Materials, respectively.

2.7. Data Extraction and Analysis

Data from the included studies was extracted and reported using the Population, Exposure, Comparator and Outcomes (PECO) framework [58]. Extracted information included the author(s), year of publication, country, population (number of participants, ethnicity, age, parity), exposure/comparator (mode of birth), outcomes (measure used to assess the level of sexual function, interval from birth to sexual function measurement) and the main findings. The main findings show the impact between modes of birth and sexual function with 1) associations (crude or adjusted): this includes odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, or relative risk with 95% confidence intervals 2) differences between modes of birth and accompanying mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) sexual function scores.

3. Results

3.1. Search

In total, 6509 studies were identified in database searches. After removing the duplicates, screening of the titles and abstracts against the inclusion and exclusion criteria was carried out, as well as checking references and similar articles, 112 studies remained. These studies were further evaluated based on the full texts, of which 31 were included in the review. A detailed overview of the search, screening and selection process is presented in a PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1). A list of the studies that were excluded after reading the full text, and the reasons for their exclusion, is presented in Table S3 of the Supplementary Materials.

3.2. Study Characteristics

Of the 31 included studies, 9 were cross-sectional studies (4966 women; including at least 1591 primiparous women), 3 were case–control studies (368 women; including at least 357 primiparous women), 5 were retrospective cohort studies (1872 women; including at least 474 primiparous women) and 14 were prospective cohort studies (4217 women; including at least 3338 primiparous women). The studies were published between 2005 and 2022, originating from 17 countries including Turkey [59,60,61,62,63,64], the United States of America [65,66,67,68], Iran [69,70,71,72], Australia [73,74], Austria [75], Egypt [76], Poland [77], Germany [78], Japan [79], Italy [80,81], Switzerland [82], Hungary [83], China [84], Taiwan [85], Sweden [86], Israel [87] and Portugal [88]. One study did not disclose the country of origin of the research [89]. Sample size ranged from 53 to 2765. Detailed information about the included studies is presented in Table 1 (studies are sorted by study design in the order: cross-sectional, case–control, retrospective cohort, prospective cohort).
In the included studies, six different measures were used to assess sexual functioning. The FSFI was used in 25 studies [59,60,62,63,64,65,66,67,69,70,71,72,74,75,76,77,80,81,82,83,84,85,87,88,89]. A combination of the FSFI and SAQ was used in one study [78]. The GRISS was used in 2 studies [61,73]. The SHOW-Q was used in one study [68]. The SFQ28 was used in one study [79]. The PISQ-12 was used in one study [86]. Data in the included studies were collected by administering the valid measures of sexual function in the following ways: four studies used the postal system [73,74,79,82], nine studies used face to face structured interviews, or self-reporting in person at the clinics [59,60,61,62,63,64,71,72,84], two studies used telephone interviews to complete the questionnaire [65,87], four studies used online forums or web/based questionnaires [77,83,86,88], one study used a combination of telephone and in person questionnaires [68], and eleven studies did not specify how they administered the measures to the participants [66,67,69,70,75,76,78,80,81,85,89].
Of the 31 studies, 18 measured sexual function in the medium-term at ≥six months and <12 months postpartum (4945 women; including at least 3409 primiparous women) [62,63,64,67,68,69,71,74,77,78,79,80,81,83,85,87,88,89], 20 measured sexual function in the longer-term at ≥12 months postpartum (8643 women; including at least 3887 primiparous women) [59,60,61,62,65,66,70,71,73,74,75,76,78,82,83,84,85,86,88,89] and eight measured sexual function in both the medium-term and longer-term (2378 women; including at least 1749 primiparous women) [62,71,74,78,83,88,89,90]. One study measured sexual function between six and 24 months postpartum and did not provide an average time when sexual function was measured (213 women; all 213 women were primiparous) [72].
When comparing studies in terms of parity, 16 studies included only primiparous women (3901 primiparous women) [60,61,62,64,65,67,69,70,71,72,74,75,80,84,86,89], 14 studies included both primiparous and multiparous women (7222 women; including at least 1859 primiparous women) [59,63,66,68,73,77,78,79,81,82,83,85,87,88] and one study did not disclose the parity of the women included (300 women) [76].
There were 17 different modes of birth comparisons; the most common comparison was between vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy and assisted vaginal birth) and caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) (Table 1). None of the included studies compared modes of birth in cases of breech presentation.

3.3. Quality Assessment

Of the included studies, 21 were of a good quality, nine studies were rated as having a fair quality and one study was rated as being of a poor quality (Table 2).

3.4. Main Focus: Specific Mode of Birth Groups (SVB, VBE, AVB, pCS, eCS)

3.4.1. Medium-Term Outcomes (≥Six Months and <12 Months Postpartum)

Three studies showed three statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term (Table 3) [64,77,80].
One study showed a statistically significant adjusted association between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term. Planned caesarean section was associated with better total sexual functioning scores and better scores for arousal, lubrication and orgasm when compared to assisted vaginal birth [80].
Two studies showed two statistically significant crude associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term. Spontaneous vaginal birth was associated with better total sexual functioning scores when compared to assisted vaginal birth [77]. Planned caesarean section was associated with better total sexual functioning scores and better scores for arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain when compared to vaginal birth with episiotomy [64] (Table 3).
Six studies that showed no statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term [62,69,78,83,87,88] (Table 3).

3.4.2. Longer-Term Outcomes (≥12 months Postpartum)

Six studies showed 25 statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term [60,65,76,82,86,88] (Table 4).
Two studies showed two statistically significant adjusted associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term. Assisted vaginal birth was associated with increased odds of pain at 12 months postpartum, in comparison with spontaneous vaginal birth [86]. Planned caesarean section was associated with an increased risk of pain and loss of desire at six years postpartum when compared to spontaneous vaginal birth [82].
Four studies showed 23 statistically significant crude associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term. Spontaneous vaginal birth was associated with better scores pain when compared to assisted vaginal birth [88]. Vaginal birth with episiotomy was associated with worse overall sexual function and worse scores for arousal and orgasm when compared to planned caesarean section [60]. Assisted vaginal birth was associated with worse scores for orgasm and satisfaction when compared to planned caesarean section [65]. One study showed mixed results for associations between modes of birth and sexual function [76] (Table 4).
Four studies showed no statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term [62,75,78,83] (Table 4).

3.5. Secondary Focus: Non-Specific Mode of Birth Groups (Incorporated Multiple Mode of Birth Groups into One Category)

3.5.1. Medium-Term Outcomes (≥Six Months and <12 Months Postpartum)

Seven studies showed 12 statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term (Table 5) [67,71,77,79,80,81,89].
Four studies showed five statistically significant adjusted associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term. Vaginal birth with episiotomy was associated with worse total sexual functioning scores and worse sexual functioning scores for desire, compared to caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) [71]. Assisted vaginal birth was associated with worse sexual functioning scores for orgasm when compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth and vaginal birth with episiotomy) [80]. Caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) was associated with better sexual functioning scores for arousal, desire and lubrication when compared to assisted vaginal birth [79]. Vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy and assisted vaginal birth) was associated with better total sexual functioning scores when compared to caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) [67], but was associated with worse sexual functioning scores for arousal, desire and lubrication when compared to caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) [79].
Four studies showed seven statistically significant crude associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term. Spontaneous vaginal birth was associated with better sexual functioning scores for arousal, compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between vaginal episiotomy and assisted vaginal birth) and caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) [77]. Caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) was associated with better total sexual functioning scores and better scores for lubrication and orgasm yet was associated with worse scores for pain when compared to vaginal birth with episiotomy [89]. Assisted vaginal birth was associated with better scores for sexual satisfaction with partner, compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth and vaginal birth with episiotomy [79]. Caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) was associated with better total sexual functioning scores and better scores for pain and arousal, compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy and assisted vaginal birth) [77,81] (Table 5).
Six studies showed no statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term (Table 5) [63,68,74,78,85,88].

3.5.2. Longer-Term Outcomes (≥12 Months Postpartum)

Four studies showed 6 statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term (Table 6) [66,70,71,73].
Two studies showed four statistically significant adjusted associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term. Caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) was associated with increased satisfaction with vaginal tone when compared to spontaneous vaginal birth and assisted vaginal birth [73]. Assisted vaginal birth was associated with an increased risk of loss of desire at ≥10 years postpartum, when compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth and vaginal birth with episiotomy), and caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) [66].
Two studies showed two statistically significant crude associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term. Caesarean section (without differentiation between pCS and eCS) was associated with better scores for desire when compared to vaginal birth with episiotomy [71], and better scores for arousal when compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy and assisted vaginal birth) [70].
Seven studies showed no statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term (Table 6) [59,61,74,78,84,85,86,89].

3.6. Overall

Various factors were considered important when comparing the studies included in this review: study design, sample size, parity, adjustment for confounders, longitudinal follow up and study quality. Comparative analyses were performed to evaluate whether associations varied between the studies that differed in these factors.
When comparing the study design, a similar proportion of the studies were cohort or longitudinal studies compared to cross-sectional studies, and both categories showed mixed results without any consistent findings. There were more studies with a sample size of less than 500 participants [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,67,68,69,70,71,72,74,75,76,77,79,80,81,83,88] than those with a larger sample size (≥500) [66,73,78,82], yet no difference was seen in the results. There were no statistically significant associations between vaginal birth with episiotomy and sexual function, compared to other modes of birth, in studies that included both primiparous and multiparous women [59,63,66,68,73,77,78,79,81,82,83,87,88], whereas there were significant associations in the studies that included only primiparous women [60,61,62,64,65,67,69,70,71,72,74,75,80,84,85,86,89].
Based on the existing literature on sexual function, the confounders considered of great importance include: sexual (dys)function prior to pregnancy, (risk of) depression, breastfeeding status, parity and perineal tears [3,20,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Of the 15 studies that adjusted for any confounders in the analysis, nine adjusted for at least one of the most important confounders [68,73,74,77,80,82,83,85,86]. The other six studies adjusted for demographic and general health characteristics only [66,67,71,72,75,79]. No difference was seen in the results of the studies that adjusted for most important confounders and those that did not.
Of the longitudinal studies that were included, some showed no differences in associations between mode of birth and sexual functioning across various time points [62,74,78,83,85]. Some studies showed improved sexual function scores over time [71,77,89]. One longitudinal study showed worse sexual function scores for assisted vaginal births compared to spontaneous vaginal births for the domain pain at 12 months postpartum. This association was, however, not present at six months postpartum [88].
When comparing the results based on the quality of studies, no differences were seen in associations between studies that were of poor, fair and good quality.

4. Discussion

The main focus of our review was to examine the impact of specific mode of birth on medium- and longer-term sexual functioning. Our review shows that there are significant associations between mode of birth and women’s sexual function in both the medium- and longer-term. Adjusted associations showed that: assisted vaginal birth was associated with worse sexual function (overall sexual function, and arousal and lubrication domains) when compared to planned caesarean section, in the medium-term (≥six months and <12 months postpartum); in the longer-term (≥12 months postpartum), spontaneous vaginal birth was associated with better sexual function when compared to assisted vaginal birth (pain domain) and planned caesarean section (desire and pain domains). In both the medium- and longer-term, assisted vaginal birth was consistently associated with worse sexual function, compared to other modes of birth.
In regard to the secondary focus of this review (multiple modes of birth combined into one groups), no consistent pattern was shown by adjusted associations to reflect that one mode of birth group was associated with better/worse sexual function compared to another, in the medium- or longer-term.
The results from both the main and secondary focus of this review suggest that sexual dysfunction does not necessarily resolve in the first year postpartum, and that assisted vaginal birth can have lasting effects on sexual function past 12 months postpartum.
Many studies included in this review show that mode of birth is not associated with postpartum sexual functioning in the medium- and longer-term. This supports the findings of Nikolaidou in their systematic review, on the effect of mode of birth on sexual function in the short- and medium-term (up until 12 months postpartum) [36].
The associations shown in this review between assisted vaginal birth, as well as vaginal birth with episiotomy, and worse sexual function can be linked to mechanisms of injury surrounding these operative interventions: assisted vaginal birth is associated with a higher incidence of episiotomy and severe perineal trauma, as well as pelvic floor trauma and nerve damage which can affect sexual function [91,92,93,94,95]. Worse sexual function after planned caesarean section compared to spontaneous vaginal birth could be contributed to by the increased probability of wound problems/scar pain due to the abdominal incision that is involved in caesarean sections as wound problems (both relating to caesarean abdominal wounds and perineal trauma in spontaneous vaginal births) are associated with impaired general sexual health [96]. The protective effect on sexual function that was seen with planned caesarean section could be because women who undergo caesarean section have less pelvic floor trauma compared to those who have had a vaginal birth [95,97,98,99]. However, it must be noted that caesarean section is a major operation that can have serious implications for maternal health and should not be considered solely to preserve sexual function [100].
The included studies varied by study design, sample size, adjustment for confounders, and study quality, however the associations seem not to be affected by these differences.
The longitudinal improvement in sexual function could be due to the natural course of recovery after birth [101]. On the other hand, the worsening of sexual function over time could indicate that, if left untreated, postpartum sexual pain could get worse for those who had an assisted vaginal birth. However, worsening of postpartum sexual function over time could also be related to other postpartum risk factors such as breastfeeding, fatigue or stress [102].

4.1. Strengths and Limitations

The main strength of this integrative review is that only studies using validated measures to assess sexual functioning were included, allowing direct comparison between the studies, as well as increasing the ability to draw clinical implications from the results. Multiple mode of birth and intervention combinations were investigated. Additionally, we focused on the effects beyond six months postpartum, and did not limit the period of interest to a certain time after birth, meaning studies were included that examined associations up to and greater than 10 years postpartum. The majority of studies included in this review were of good quality.
Despite the strengths of this review, some limitations should be noted. When calculating associations between mode of birth and sexual function, some of the included studies did not adjust for important confounding factors in the analysis. Sexual function can be influenced by many factors, including postpartum stress and fatigue, managing relationships with partner (if applicable), life stressors (such as relationship with family, friends and work), breastfeeding, experiences during previous births, history of sexual abuse and degree of sexual dysfunction before pregnancy and birth [3,20,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Without accounting for these factors, any associations, or lack of, may be misrepresented.
Despite the evidence showing the difference between male and female sexual function, some measures of sexual function are based on dated evidence which suggests that women’s sexual function is equivalent to men’s sexual function [103], even though this evidence has been found to ignore “major components of women’s sexual satisfaction” [104], and is a more appropriate reflection of male sexuality [8]. In addition, the measures used by the studies included in this review have not yet been validated in postpartum women.
An additional limitation that should be noted is the lack of consensus on reporting standards in the papers: reporting for mode of births, as well as adjustment for confounding, was not consistent across the papers included in this review.
Two studies examined sexual function at and beyond six years postpartum and found significant adjusted associations with mode of birth [66,73]. Although it is important to examine longer-term postpartum sexual functioning, it should be noted that such a long time gap between birth and measurement of postpartum sexual function means that other factors, besides mode of birth and those adjusted for, may affect sexual function (e.g., menopause, mental health, physical health relationship satisfaction, relationship with child) [3,20,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].
Many of the included studies did not adjust for important confounders, with only nine of 31 studies adjusting for at least one of the most important confounders. Therefore, this needs to be considered as a limitation and taken into account when interpreting any associations reported in this review.

4.2. Recommendations

Future studies should take into account pre-existing sexual dysfunction, quality of the relationship between the parents before and after birth, experienced birth trauma and the model of care experienced, in order to elucidate whether these factors can explain the associations found between mode of birth and sexual function.
Another avenue of research that should be explored is how the health care a woman receives, if any, during the postpartum period affects sexual function. Given how important sexual functioning can be for a woman [1,2,3,4], future research should aim to identify types of care that can help avoid a decline in postpartum sexual function.
Additionally, studying women who have more complex births and are underrepresented in the current literature should be made a priority: for example, many studies excluded women who did not have a singleton birth despite the fact that the proportion of twin births out of total births (per 1000 births) is 14.4 in Europe [105]. In a similar vein, some studies excluded births of babies that were not in cephalic presentation, despite the fact that approximately three to five per cent of women give birth to a child in a breech presentation [106,107].
There is some evidence that incidence of perineal trauma after birth varies between different ethnic groups; a systematic review showed that the majority of studies conducted in Western countries describe women of Asian ethnicity as having increased risk of severe perineal trauma during birth, whereas Asian women living in Asia were not at increased risk. The reasons for this were unknown but could be attributed to differing care that women from different ethnic groups receive, differing birthing techniques, ethnic anatomical differences or cultural differences, and changes in diet when moving to Western countries [108,109]. Therefore, the diversity of the study population, within the geographical area that the study is conducted in, should be disclosed and associations between different ethnicities should be explored in order to attempt to explain why some ethnicities can be at higher risk during labour and birth, as well as during the postpartum period.
It would be valuable to contextualise sexual functioning scores by asking women more in depth, follow-up questions about their postpartum sexual function. This would help to understand why associations exist in the quantitative data, and identify how postpartum care, focused on sexual function, could help women. It is of vital importance that measures are validated in postpartum women. Additionally, it is important that sexual function measures and have undergone cross-cultural validation, for both linguistics and culture, when they are used to measure sexual function in women whose cultural backgrounds differ from those that the measures were originally validated in.

5. Conclusions

This integrative review summarises the existing evidence on the impact of different modes of birth on sexual functioning, in the medium- (≥six months and <12 months postpartum) and longer-term (≥12 months postpartum), published between 2005 and 2023. Assisted vaginal birth has been found to be associated with worse sexual function when compared to spontaneous vaginal birth and caesarean section in both the medium- and longer-term. However, it should also be noted that some studies showed that spontaneous vaginal birth and caesarean section were associated with worse sexual function in comparison to other modes of birth. No mode of birth can be recommended to preserve sexual function in the medium- or longer-term. Therefore, it is important that postpartum sexual functioning is discussed with mothers for all modes of births, in order to encourage women to seek help and support from healthcare professionals should their sexual function be impaired after birth.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph20075252/s1, Table S1: domains and options for quality assessment using NOS; Table S2: scoring system for quality assessment using NOS; Table S3: studies that were excluded after reading full text and reasons for exclusion.

Author Contributions

A.-M.F., N.G. and L.L.P. were involved in the conceptualization of the integrative systematic review. A.-M.F., N.G. and L.L.P. developed the search strategy in consultation with all authors. A.-M.F. and N.G. screened the articles and conducted quality appraisal and data extraction, afterwards discrepancies were discussed with L.L.P. A.-M.F. wrote the manuscript under supervision of L.L.P. and all other involved authors (A.D.J., N.G., L.T., H.G.D. and M.A.S.) made substantial contributions in several review processes. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by EUCAN-connect, A federated FAIR platform enabling large-scale analysis of high-value cohort data connecting Europe and Canada in personalised health. This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 824989. L.T. was supported by the European Regional Development Fund—Project “Creativity and Adaptability as Conditions of the Success of Europe in an Interrelated World” (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000734).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

The authors recognise that individuals have various ways of identifying gender. Rather than avoiding gendering birth, by using phrases such as ‘pregnant person/people’, ‘parent’ or ‘person/people giving birth’, the terms woman, mother and maternity have been used. This is because women are also a marginalised people in most places throughout the world. However, use of these words are not meant to exclude those who give birth and do not identify as a woman. This inclusivity statement is based off work by Kluwgant et al. (2022), and Gribble et al. (2022), on the importance of sexed language and gender identity.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Martine J.M. Boon for her work in starting the systematic review process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Search Strategy

PubMed:
(“Postpartum Period”[Mesh] OR postpartum[tiab] OR post-partum[tiab] OR puerperium[tiab] OR “after childbirth” OR after birth[tiab] OR after delivery[tiab] OR after labor[tiab] OR after labour[tiab] OR postnatal*[tiab])
AND
(“Delivery, Obstetric”[Mesh] OR “Parturition”[Mesh] OR ((mode[tiab] OR modes[tiab] OR route*[tiab] OR type*[tiab]) AND (labor[tiab] OR labour[tiab] OR delivery[tiab] OR birth[tiab] OR childbirth[tiab])) OR method of birth[tiab] OR method of delivery[tiab] OR instrumental delivery[tiab] OR episiotom*[tiab] OR caesarean[tiab])
AND
(“Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological”[Mesh] OR “Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological”[Mesh] OR “Sexual Health”[Mesh] OR “Sexuality”[Mesh] OR “Sexual Behavior”[Mesh] OR “Orgasm”[Mesh] OR “Libido”[Mesh] OR sexual*[tiab] OR intercourse[tiab] OR sex life[tiab] OR (resum*[tiab] AND sex[tiab]) OR sex[ti])
AND
(“Cohort Studies”[Mesh] OR “Case-Control Studies”[Mesh] OR “Cross-Sectional Studies”[Mesh] OR “Surveys and Questionnaires”[Mesh] OR prospectiv*[tiab] OR follow-up[tiab] OR longitudinal*[tiab] OR risk[tiab] OR associat*[tiab] OR relat*[ti] OR influenc*[tiab] OR predict*[tiab] OR questionnair*[tiab] OR cohort[tiab] OR case–control[tiab] OR crosssectional*[tiab] OR cross-sectional*[tiab])
Embase:
(‘puerperium’/exp OR ((postpartum OR ‘post-partum’ OR puerperium OR ‘after childbirth’ OR ‘after birth’ OR ‘after delivery’ OR ‘after labor’ OR ‘after labour’ OR ‘postnatal*’):ti,ab,kw))
AND
(‘obstetric delivery’/exp OR ‘birth’/exp OR ((((mode OR modes OR route* OR type*) AND (labor OR labour OR delivery OR birth OR childbirth)) OR ‘method of birth’ OR ‘method of delivery’ OR ‘instrumental delivery’ OR episiotom* OR caesarean):ti,ab,kw))
AND
(‘sexual dysfunction’/exp OR ‘psychosexual disorder’/exp OR ‘sexual health’/exp OR ‘sexuality’/exp OR ‘sexual behaviour’/exp OR ‘orgasm’/exp OR ‘libido’/exp OR ((sexual* OR intercourse OR ‘sex life’ OR (resum* AND sex) OR sex):ti,ab,kw))
AND
(‘cohort analysis’/exp OR ‘case–control study’/exp OR ‘cross-sectional study’/exp OR ‘questionnaire’/exp OR ((prospectiv* OR ‘follow-up’ OR longitudinal* OR risk OR associat* OR relat* OR influenc* OR predict* OR questionnair* OR cohort OR ‘case–control’ OR crosssectional* OR ‘cross-sectional*’):ti,ab,kw))
CINAHL:
(MH “Postnatal Period+” OR TI “postpartum” OR AB “postpartum” OR TI “post-partum” OR AB “post-partum” OR TI “puerperium” OR AB “puerperium” OR TI “after childbirth” OR AB “after childbirth” OR TI “after birth” OR AB “after birth” OR TI “after delivery” OR AB “after delivery” OR TI “after labor” OR AB “after labor” OR TI “after labour” OR AB “after labour” OR TI “postnatal*” OR AB “postnatal*”)
AND
(MH “Delivery, Obstetric+” OR MH “Labor+” OR ((TI “mode” OR AB “mode” OR TI “modes” OR AB “modes” OR TI “route*” OR AB “route*” OR TI “type*” OR AB “types*”) AND (TI “labor” OR AB “labor” OR TI “labour” OR AB “labour” OR TI “delivery” OR AB “delivery” OR TI “birth” OR AB “birth” OR TI “childbirth” OR AB “childbirth”)) OR TI “method of birth” OR AB “method of birth” OR TI “method of delivery” OR AB “method of delivery” OR TI “instrumental delivery” OR AB “instrumental delivery” OR TI “episiotom*” OR AB “episiotom*” OR TI “ceasarean” OR AB “ceasarean”)
AND
(MH “Sexual Dysfunction, Female+” OR MH “Psychosexual Disorders+” OR MH “Sexual Health+” OR MH “Sexuality+” OR MH “Sexual Behavior Analysis (Saba CCC)+” OR MH “Orgasm+” OR TI “sexual*” OR AB “sexual*” OR TI “intercourse” OR AB “intercourse” OR TI “sex life” OR AB “sex life” OR ((TI “resum* OR AB “resum*”) AND (TI “sex” OR AB “sex”)) OR TI “sex”)
AND
(MH “Prospective Studies+” OR MH “Case Control Studies+” OR MH “Cross Sectional Studies+” OR MH “Surveys+” OR TI “prospectiv*” OR AB “prospectiv*” OR TI “follow-up” OR AB “follow-up” OR TI “longitudinal*” OR AB “longitudinal*” OR TI “risk” OR AB “risk” OR TI “associat*” OR AB “associat*” OR TI “relat*” OR TI “influenc*” OR AB “influenc*” OR TI “predict*” OR AB “predict*” OR TI “questionnair*” OR AB “questionnair*” OR TI “cohort” OR AB “cohort” OR TI “case–control” OR AB “case–control” OR TI “crosssectional*” OR AB “crosssectional*” OR TI “cross-sectional*” OR AB “cross-sectional*”)

References

  1. Andreucci, C.B.; Bussadori, J.C.; Pacagnella, R.C.; Chou, D.; Filippi, V.; Say, L.; Cecatti, J.G.; Brazilian COMMAG Study Group; WHO Maternal Morbidity Working Group. Sexual life and dysfunction after maternal morbidity: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015, 15, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Jamali, S.; Inaloo, R.; Javadpour, S.; Haghbeen, M.; Poornowrooz, N. The Relationship between Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Reproductive-agegrouped Women in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ambient. Sci. 2018, 5, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gutzeit, O.; Levy, G.; Lowenstein, L. Postpartum Female Sexual Function: Risk Factors for Postpartum Sexual Dysfunction. Sex. Med. 2020, 8, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lagaert, L.; Weyers, S.; Van Kerrebroeck, H.; Elaut, E. Postpartum dyspareunia and sexual functioning: A prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2017, 22, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. American Psychiatric Association, D.; American Psychiatric, A. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sungur, M.Z.; Gündüz, A. A Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Definitions for Sexual Dysfunctions: Critiques and Challenges. J. Sex. Med. 2014, 11, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chivers, M.L.; Bailey, J.M. A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biol. Psychol. 2005, 70, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Domoney, C. Sexual function in women: What is normal? Int. Urogynecology J. 2009, 20, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Macfarlane, A.J.; Blondel, B.; Mohangoo, A.D.; Cuttini, M.; Nijhuis, J.; Novak, Z.; Ólafsdóttir, H.S.; Zeitlin, J.; the Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: Risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016, 123, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. démographiques, I. Population, Births, Deaths: Population, Births and Deaths in Europe and Other Developed OECD Countries. 2021. Available online: https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/data/europe-developed-countries/population-births-deaths/ (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  11. Blondel, B.; Alexander, S.; Bjarnadóttir, R.; Gissler, M.; Langhoff-Roos, J.; Novak-Antolič, Ž.; Prunet, C.; Zhang, W.H.; Hindori-Mohangoo, A.D.; Zeitlin, J. Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: A study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project. Acta Obs. Gynecol. Scand. 2016, 95, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Digital, N. NHS Maternity Statistics 2020–2021. 2021. Available online: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternity-statistics/2020-21 (accessed on 6 October 2022).
  13. OECD. Caesarean Sections (Indicator). 2022. Available online: https://data.oecd.org/healthcare/caesarean-sections.htm (accessed on 6 October 2022).
  14. World Health Organisation. Caesarean Section Rates Continue to Rise, Amid Growing Inequalities in Access. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access (accessed on 16 June 2021).
  15. Rudey, E.L.; Leal, M.d.C.; Rego, G. Cesarean section rates in Brazil: Trend analysis using the Robson classification system. Medicine 2020, 99, e19880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Departamento de Análise Epidemiológica e Vigilância de Doenças Não Transmissíveis. Painel de Monitoramento de Nascidos Vivos-Natalidade-Painéis de Monitoramento-Centrais de Conteúdos-DANTPS-SVS/MS. 2019. Available online: http://svs.aids.gov.br/dantps/centrais-de-conteudos/paineis-de-monitoramento/natalidade/nascidos-vivos/ (accessed on 3 March 2022).
  17. Potter, J.E.; Berquó, E.; Perpétuo, I.H.O.; Leal, O.F.; Hopkins, K.; Souza, M.R.; de Carvalho Formiga, M.C. Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: Prospective study. BMJ 2001, 323, 1155–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. McDonald, E.; Brown, S. Does method of birth make a difference to when women resume sex after childbirth? BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013, 120, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McDonald, E.; Gartland, D.; Woolhouse, H.; Brown, S. Resumption of sex after a second birth: An Australian prospective cohort. Birth 2019, 46, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Glazener, C.M.A. Sexual function after childbirth: Women’s experiences, persistent morbidity and lack of professional recognition. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1997, 104, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Faisal-Cury, A.; Menezes, P.R.; Quayle, J.; Matijasevich, A.; Diniz, S.G. The Relationship Between Mode of Delivery and Sexual Health Outcomes after Childbirth. J. Sex. Med. 2015, 12, 1212–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barrett, G.; Pendry, E.; Peacock, J.; Victor, C.; Thakar, R.; Manyonda, I. Women’s Sexuality After Childbirth: A Pilot Study. Arch. Sex. Behav. 1999, 28, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hjorth, S.; Kirkegaard, H.; Olsen, J.; Thornton, J.G.; Nohr, E.A. Mode of birth and long-term sexual health: A follow-up study of mothers in the Danish National Birth Cohort. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e029517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Scavello, I.; Maseroli, E.; Di Stasi, V.; Vignozzi, L. Sexual Health in Menopause. Medicina 2019, 55, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Fabre, L.F.; Smith, L.C. The Effect of Major Depression on Sexual Function in Women. J. Sex. Med. 2012, 9, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jiannine, L. An investigation of the relationship between physical fitness, self-concept, and sexual functioning. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2018, 7, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Maseroli, E.; Rastrelli, G.; Di Stasi, V.; Cipriani, S.; Scavello, I.; Todisco, T.; Gironi, V.; Castellini, G.; Ricca, V.; Sorbi, F.; et al. Physical Activity and Female Sexual Dysfunction: A Lot Helps, But Not Too Much. J. Sex. Med. 2021, 18, 1217–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gottfried, R.; Lev-Wiesel, R.; Hallak, M.; Lang-Franco, N. Inter-relationships between sexual abuse, female sexual function and childbirth. Midwifery 2015, 31, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Banaei, M.; Azizi, M.; Moridi, A.; Dashti, S.; Yabandeh, A.P.; Roozbeh, N. Sexual dysfunction and related factors in pregnancy and postpartum: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst. Rev. 2019, 8, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Eid, M.A.; Sayed, A.; Abdel-Rehim, R.; Mostafa, T. Impact of the mode of delivery on female sexual function after childbirth. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2015, 27, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Witting, K.; Santtila, P.; Varjonen, M.; Jern, P.; Johansson, A.; Von Der Pahlen, B.; Sandnabba, K. Original Research—Couples’ Sexual Dysfunctions: Female Sexual Dysfunction, Sexual Distress, and Compatibility with Partner. J. Sex. Med. 2008, 5, 2587–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yıldız, H. The Relation Between Prepregnancy Sexuality and Sexual Function During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: A Prospective Study. J. Sex Marital. Ther. 2015, 41, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bodenmann, G.; Atkins, D.C.; Schär, M.; Poffet, V. The association between daily stress and sexual activity. J. Fam. Psychol. 2010, 24, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sayasneh, A.; Pandeva, I. Postpartum Sexual Dysfunction: A literature review of risk factors and role of mode of delivery. BJMP 2010, 3, 316–320. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hicks, T.L.; Goodall, S.F.; Quattrone, E.M.; Lydon-Rochelle, M.T. Postpartum sexual functioning and method of delivery: Summary of the evidence. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2004, 49, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nikolaidou, E.; Antoniou, E.; Sarella, A.; Iliadou, M.; Orovou, E.; Dagla, M. The Effect of Type of Delivery on Female Postpartum Sexual Functioning: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wiegel, M.; Meston, C.; Rosen, R. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Cross-Validation and Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores. J. Sex Marital. Ther. 2005, 31, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Goldfarb, S.; Baron, S.R.; Tessler Lindau, S. Chapter 23-Female Sexuality and Sexual Function. In Women and Health, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ter Kuile, M.M.; Brauer, M.; Laan, E. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): Psychometric Properties within a Dutch Population. J. Sex Marital. Ther. 2006, 32, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rust, J.; Golombok, S. The GRISS: A psychometric instrument for the assessment of sexual dysfunction. Arch. Sex. Behav. 1986, 15, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Shoji, M.; Hamatani, T.; Ishikawa, S.; Kuji, N.; Ohta, H.; Matsui, H.; Yoshimura, Y. Sexual Satisfaction of infertile couples assessed using the Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS). Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Rust, J.; Golombok, S. GRISS-The Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction: Test Manual. In The Psychometrics Centre; UoC, Ed.; University of Cambridge Psychometrics Centre, Cambridge Judge Business School: Cambridge, UK, 1986; p. 33. Available online: https://www.psychometrics.cam.ac.uk/files/griss_manual.pdf (accessed on 25 March 2022).
  43. Learman, L.A.; Huang, A.J.; Nakagawa, S.; Gregorich, S.E.; Kuppermann, M. Development and validation of a sexual functioning measure for use in diverse women’s health outcome studies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 198, 710.e1–710.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Selcuk, S.; Kucukbas, M.; Cam, C.; Eser, A.; Devranoglu, B.; Turkyilmaz, S.; Karateke, A. Validation of the Turkish Version of the Sexual Health Outcomes in Women Questionnaire (SHOW-Q) in Turkish-Speaking Women. Sex. Med. 2016, 4, e89–e94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Thirlaway, K.; Fallowfield, L.; Cuzick, J. The Sexual Activity Questionnaire: A Measure of Women’s Sexual Functioning. Qual. Life Res. 1996, 5, 81–90. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4034783 (accessed on 5 April 2022). [CrossRef]
  46. Oppenheimer, A.; Panel, P.; Rouquette, A.; du Cheyron, J.; Deffieux, X.; Fauconnier, A. Validation of the Sexual Activity Questionnaire in women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vistad, I.; Fosså, S.D.; Kristensen, G.B.; Mykletun, A.; Dahl, A.A. The Sexual Activity Questionnaire: Pychometric Properties And Normative Data in A Norwegian Population Sample. J. Women’s Health 2007, 16, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Boncinelli, V.; Civilotti, C.; Bernorio, R.; Caruso, S.; Di Fini, G.; Giommi, R.; Lenzi, E.; Mori, G.; Rossetto, C.; Rossi, R.; et al. The Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ): A psychometric evaluation. Sex. Relatsh. Ther. 2022, 37, 489–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Quirk, F.H.; Heiman, J.R.; Rosen, R.C.; Laan, E.; Smith, M.D.; Boolell, M. Development of a Sexual Function Questionnaire for Clinical Trials of Female Sexual Dysfunction. J. Women’s Health Gend.-Based Med. 2002, 11, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Quirk, F.; Haughie, S.; Symonds, T. The Use of the Sexual Function Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Women with Sexual Dysfunction. J. Sex. Med. 2005, 2, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Symonds, T.; Abraham, L.; Bushmakin, A.G.; Williams, K.; Martin, M.; Cappelleri, J.C. Sexual Function Questionnaire: Further Refinement and Validation. J. Sex. Med. 2012, 9, 2609–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. ‘t Hoen, L.A.; Utomo, E.; Steensma, A.B.; Blok, B.F.M.; Korfage, I.J. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12): Validation of the Dutch version. Int. Urogynecology J. 2015, 26, 1293–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Rogers, R.G.; Coates, K.W.; Kammerer-Doak, D.; Khalsa, S.; Qualls, C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int. Urogynecology J. 2003, 14, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, H.; Lau, H.-H.; Hung, M.-J.; Huang, W.-C.; Zheng, Y.-W.; Su, T.-H. Validation of a Mandarin Chinese version of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire IUGA–revised (PISQ-IR). Int. Urogynecology J. 2015, 26, 1695–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wells, G.A.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; Available online: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed on 19 April 2022).
  56. Sharmin, S.; Kypri, K.; Khanam, M.; Wadolowski, M.; Bruno, R.; Attia, J.; Holliday, E.; Palazzi, K.; Mattick, R.P. Effects of parental alcohol rules on risky drinking and related problems in adolescence: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017, 178, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sharmin, S.; Kypri, K.; Khanam, M.; Wadolowski, M.; Bruno, R.; Mattick, R.P. Parental Supply of Alcohol in Childhood and Risky Drinking in Adolescence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. National Toxicology Program. Handbook for Conducting a Literature-Based Health Assessment Using Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Approach for Systematic Review and Evidence Integration. Available online: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/ohat/pubs/handbookmarch2019_508.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  59. Baytur, Y.B.; Deveci, A.; Uyar, Y.; Ozcakir, H.T.; Kizilkaya, S.; Caglar, H. Mode of delivery and pelvic floor muscle strength and sexual function after childbirth. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2005, 88, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Doğan, B.; Gün, İ.; Özdamar, Ö.; Yılmaz, A.; Muhçu, M. Long-term impacts of vaginal birth with mediolateral episiotomy on sexual and pelvic dysfunction and perineal pain. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017, 30, 457–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gungor, S.; Baser, I.; Ceyhan, S.; Karasahin, E.; Acikel, C.H. Mode of delivery and subsequent long-term sexual function of primiparous women. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2007, 19, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Kahramanoglu, I.; Baktiroglu, M.; Hamzaoglu, K.; Kahramanoglu, O.; Verit, F.F.; Yucel, O. The impact of mode of delivery on the sexual function of primiparous women: A prospective study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2017, 295, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Saydam, B.K.; Demireloz Akyuz, M.; Sogukpinar, N.; Ceber Turfan, E. Effect of delivery method on sexual dysfunction. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 32, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Baksu, B.; Davas, I.; Agar, E.; Akyol, A.; Varolan, A. The effect of mode of delivery on postpartum sexual functioning in primiparous women. Int. Urogynecology J. 2007, 18, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Crane, A.K.; Geller, E.J.; Bane, H.; Ju, R.; Myers, E.; Matthews, C.A. Evaluation of pelvic floor symptoms and sexual function in primiparous women who underwent operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery for second-stage arrest. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2013, 19, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Fehniger, J.E.; Brown, J.S.; Creasman, J.M.; Van Den Eeden, S.K.; Thom, D.H.; Subak, L.L.; Huang, A.J. Childbirth and female sexual function later in life. Obs. Gynecol. 2013, 122, 988–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Rogers, R.; Leeman, L.; Borders, N.; Qualls, C.; Fullilove, A.; Teaf, D.; Hall, R.J.; Albers, L.L. Abstracts of the oral presentations from the 37th Annual IUGA (International Urogynecological Association) Meeting. Brisbane, Australia, 4–8 September 2012. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2012, 23 (Suppl. S2), S43–S244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yee, L.M.; Kaimal, A.J.; Nakagawa, S.; Houston, K.; Kuppermann, M. Predictors of postpartum sexual activity and function in a diverse population of women. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2013, 58, 654–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Dabiri, F.; Yabandeh, A.P.; Shahi, A.; Kamjoo, A.; Teshnizi, S.H. The effect of mode of delivery on postpartum sexual functioning in primiparous women. Oman Med. J. 2014, 29, 276–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ghorat, F.; Esfehani, R.J.; Sharifzadeh, M.; Tabarraei, Y.; Aghahosseini, S.S. Long term effect of vaginal delivery and cesarean section on female sexual function in primipara mothers. Electron. Physician 2017, 9, 3991–3996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Moghadam, M.; Zaheri, F.; Shams Alizadeh, N.; Shahsavari, S. The Relationship Between the Type of Delivery and Sexual Function in Mothers Referring to Kourdistan (Sanandaj) Health Centers in 2015–2016. Crescent J. Med. Biol. Sci. 2019, 6, 473–480. Available online: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=776956 (accessed on 23 March 2022).
  72. Hosseini, L.; Iran-Pour, E.; Safarinejad, M.R. Sexual function of primiparous women after elective cesarean section and normal vaginal delivery. Urol. J. 2012, 9, 498–504. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22641494 (accessed on 25 March 2022). [PubMed]
  73. Dean, N.; Wilson, D.; Herbison, P.; Glazener, C.; Aung, T.; Macarthur, C. Sexual function, delivery mode history, pelvic floor muscle exercises and incontinence: A cross-sectional study six years post-partum. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2008, 48, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. De Souza, A.; Dwyer, P.L.; Charity, M.; Thomas, E.; Ferreira, C.H.J.; Schierlitz, L. The effects of mode delivery on postpartum sexual function: A prospective study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015, 122, 1410–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Klein, K.; Worda, C.; Leipold, H.; Gruber, C.; Husslein, P.; Wenzl, R. Does the Mode of Delivery Influence Sexual Function after Childbirth? J. Women’s Health 2009, 18, 1227–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mohammed, Y.; Hassan, H.; Dinary, A.; Rashed, N. Sexual Function after Childbirth according to the Mode of Delivery. Androl. Gynecol. Curr. Res. 2016, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zgliczynska, M.; Zasztowt-Sternicka, M.; Kosinska-Kaczynska, K.; Szymusik, I.; Pazdzior, D.; Durmaj, A.; Szlachta, M.; Bartnik, P.; Wielgos, M. Impact of childbirth on women’s sexuality in the first year after the delivery. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2021, 47, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Spaich, S.; Link, G.; Alvarez, S.O.; Weiss, C.; Sütterlin, M.; Tuschy, B.; Berlit, S. Influence of Peripartum Expectations, Mode of Delivery, and Perineal Injury on Women’s Postpartum Sexuality. J. Sex. Med. 2020, 17, 1312–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Song, M.; Ishii, H.; Toda, M.; Tomimatsu, T.; Katsuyama, H.; Nakamura, T.; Nakai, Y.; Shimoya, K. Association between sexual health and delivery mode. Sex. Med. 2014, 2, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Barbara, G.; Pifarotti, P.; Facchin, F.; Cortinovis, I.; Dridi, D.; Ronchetti, C.; Calzolari, L.; Vercellini, P. Impact of Mode of Delivery on Female Postpartum Sexual Functioning: Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery and Operative Vaginal Delivery vs Cesarean Section. J. Sex. Med. 2016, 13, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Di Dedda, M.; Cantaluppi, S.; Sorice, P.; Zehhaf, C.; Braga, A.; Cattoni, E.; Serati, M. Sexual disfunctions after childbirth and mode of delivery: Is there a correlation? Neurourol. Urodyn. 2017, 36, S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Baud, D.; Sichitiu, J.; Lombardi, V.; De Rham, M.; Meyer, S.; Vial, Y.; Achtari, C. Comparison of pelvic floor dysfunction 6 years after uncomplicated vaginal versus elective cesarean deliveries: A cross-sectional study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Szollosi, K.; Komka, K.; Szabo, L. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction during the first year postpartum: A prospective study. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2021, 157, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cai, L.; Zhang, B.; Lin, H.; Xing, W.; Chen, J. Does vaginal delivery affect postnatal coitus? Int. J. Impot. Res. 2014, 26, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chang, S.-R.; Chen, K.-H.; Ho, H.-N.; Lai, Y.-H.; Lin, M.-I.; Lee, C.-N.; Lin, W.-A. Depressive symptoms, pain, and sexual dysfunction over the first year following vaginal or cesarean delivery: A prospective longitudinal study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2015, 52, 1433–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Dahlgren, H.; Jansson, M.H.; Franzén, K.; Hiyoshi, A.; Nilsson, K. Sexual function in primiparous women: A prospective study. Int. Urogynecology J. 2022, 33, 1567–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lurie, S.; Aizenberg, M.; Sulema, V.; Boaz, M.; Kovo, M.; Golan, A.; Sadan, O. Sexual function after childbirth by the mode of delivery: A prospective study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2013, 288, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. de Sousa, N.Q.; Borges, A.C.; Sarabando, R.; Bivar, L.; Viana, J.; Cerqueira, M.; Miranda, A.; Reis, I.; Nogueira-Silva, C. The Role of Operative Vaginal Delivery in Postpartum Sexual Dysfunction: MOODS-A Prospective Study. J. Sex. Med. 2021, 18, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. De souza, A.M.; Dwyer, P.L.; Thomas, E.; Charity, M.; Schierlitz, L. A prospective study of sexual well being at 12 months postpartum. Does mode of delivery matter? Int. Urogynecology J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013, 24, S84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chang, S.R.; Chen, K.H.; Lin, M.I.; Lin, W.A. Sexual Dysfunction through 1 Year Postpartum Following Vaginal or Caesarean Delivery. J. Sex. Med. 2015, 12, 351–352. Available online: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L619674160&from=export (accessed on 2 November 2022).
  91. Gossett, D.R.; Gilchrist-Scott, D.; Wayne, D.B.; Gerber, S.E. Simulation Training for Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Delivery and Rates of Maternal Perineal Trauma. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 128, 429–435. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2016/09000/Simulation_Training_for_Forceps_Assisted_Vaginal.3.aspx (accessed on 9 June 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Hudelist, G.; Gelle’n, J.; Singer, C.; Ruecklinger, E.; Czerwenka, K.; Kandolf, O.; Keckstein, J. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: Role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 192, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Walker, C.; Rodríguez, T.; Herranz, A.; Espinosa, J.A.; Sánchez, E.; Espuña-Pons, M. Alternative model of birth to reduce the risk of assisted vaginal delivery and perineal trauma. Int. Urogynecology J. 2012, 23, 1249–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Smith, L.A.; Price, N.; Simonite, V.; Burns, E.E. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: A prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Quoc Huy, N.V.; Phuc An, L.S.; Phuong, L.S.; Tam, L.M. Pelvic Floor and Sexual Dysfunction After Vaginal Birth With Episiotomy in Vietnamese Women. Sex. Med. 2019, 7, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Lal, M.; Pattison, H.M.; Allan, T.F.; Callender, R. Does post-caesarean dyspareunia reflect sexual malfunction, pelvic floor and perineal dysfunction? J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011, 31, 617–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Almeida, E.C.S.; Nogueira, A.A.; Candido dos Reis, F.J.; Rosa e Silva, J.C. Cesarean section as a cause of chronic pelvic pain. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2002, 79, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fynes, M.; Donnelly, V.S.; O’Connell, P.R.; O’Herlihy, C. Cesarean delivery and anal sphincter injury. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998, 92 Pt 1, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Pakenham, S.; Chamberlain, S.M.; Smith, G.N. Women’s Views on Elective Primary Caesarean Section. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2006, 28, 1089–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sandall, J.; Tribe, R.M.; Avery, L.; Mola, G.; Visser, G.H.; Homer, C.S.; Gibbons, D.; Kelly, N.M.; Kennedy, H.P.; Kidanto, H.; et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet 2018, 392, 1349–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Effati-Daryani, F.; Jahanfar, S.; Mohammadi, A.; Zarei, S.; Mirghafourvand, M. The relationship between sexual function and mental health in Iranian pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Alligood-Percoco, N.R.; Kjerulff, K.H.; Repke, J.T. Risk Factors for Dyspareunia After First Childbirth. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 128, 512. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2016/09000/Risk_Factors_for_Dyspareunia_After_First.13.aspx (accessed on 15 November 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Masters, W.H.; Johnson, V.E. Human Sexual Response; Little Brown: Boston, MA, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  104. Basson, R. The Female Sexual Response: A Different Model. J. Sex Marital. Ther. 2000, 26, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Monden, C.; Pison, G.; Smits, J. Twin Peaks: More twinning in humans than ever before. Hum. Reprod. 2021, 36, 1666–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sentilhes, L.; Schmitz, T.; Azria, E.; Gallot, D.; Ducarme, G.; Korb, D.; Mattuizzi, A.; Parant, O.; Sananès, N.; Baumann, S.; et al. Présentation du siège. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF–Texte court. Gynécologie Obs. Fertil. Sénologie 2020, 48, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Tunde-Byass, M.O.; Hannah, M.E. Breech vaginal delivery at or near term. Semin. Perinatol. 2003, 27, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wheeler, J.; Davis, D.; Fry, M.; Brodie, P.; Homer, C.S.E. Is Asian ethnicity an independent risk factor for severe perineal trauma in childbirth? A systematic review of the literature. Women Birth 2012, 25, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Henderson, J.; Gao, H.; Redshaw, M. Experiencing maternity care: The care received and perceptions of women from different ethnic groups. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart illustrating the systematic database search for articles that met the inclusion criteria.
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart illustrating the systematic database search for articles that met the inclusion criteria.
Ijerph 20 05252 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.
Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.
Population Exposure/ComparisonOutcome
Author, YearPopulation
Characteristics
Study
Design
Data
Collection
Time of Data
Collection
Analysed
Participants
Mode of Birth Definition
Sexual Health/
Function
Statistical AnalysisResults
Barbara et al.
2016 [80]
Country:
Italy

Ethnicity:
Caucasian

Age:
Mean = 34.4 (SD ± 4.9)

Parity:
100%
primiparous
Cross
sectional
How:
Questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
53.3% (269/505)
6 months postpartumNumber:
n = 269

Recruitment:
During first 3 days after birth before discharge from Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy in 2013.
SVB/
VBE:
49.1%
(n = 132)

AVB:
16.7%
(n = 45)

pCS:
34.2%
(n = 92)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores

FSFI dichotomous score: sexual dysfunction was defined with a score ≤26.5
Analysis:
One-way and multivariate ANOVA and Chi-square test

Multiple hierarchical regressions:
To control for confounders (demographics, postpartum depression and breastfeeding status)
At 6 months after birth, sexual dysfunction was highest in AVB group (51.1%) compared to SVB/VBE (42.2%) and pCS (33.7%) groups.

After multiple hierarchical regression:
At 6 months after birth, there was association between AVB and worse total FSFI score, compared to pCS. (β = −2.566, SE = 0.995, 95% CI= −4.525, −0.607, p = 0.01).

At 6 months after birth, there was association between AVB and worse arousal FSFI domain score, compared to pCS. (β = −0.471, SE = 0.192, 95% CI = −0.849, −0.093, p = 0.015)

At 6 months after birth, there was association between AVB and worse lubrication FSFI domain score, compared to pCS. (β = −0.451, SE = 0.226, 95% CI = −0.897, −0.005, p = 0.05)

At 6 months after birth, there was association between AVB and worse orgasm FSFI domain score, compared to pCS. (β = −0.627, SE = 0.253, 95% CI = −4.525, −0.607 p = 0.01)

At 6 months after birth, there was association between SVB/VBE and better orgasm FSFI domain score, compared to AVB. (β = 0.605, SE = 0.233, 95% CI = 0.145, 1.064, p = 0.01).

No significant differences were found between SVB/VBE and pCS groups for total FSFI score or FSFI domain specific scores.
Baud et al.,
2020 [82]
Country:
Switzerland

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age (at time of questionnaire, approximately 6 years postpartum):
SVB: Mean = 36.6 (SD ± 5.3)
pCS: Mean = 37.3 (SD ± 5.4)

Parity:
SVB: 83.7% primiparous; 16.3% multiparous
pCS: 81.5% primiparous; 18.5% multiparous
Cross
sectional
How:
Postal questionnaires

Inclusion rate:
49%
(604/1231)
6 years postpartumNumber:
n = 517

Recruitment:
Women who gave birth in period 1996–2011 whose data was in the obstetrical database at the Maternity Hospital of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois.
SVB:
59.8% (n = 309)

pCS:
40.2% (n = 208)
FSFI -total score

FSFI dichotomous score: severe sexual dysfunction was defined with a score ≤25
Analysis:
Generalised linear models using Poisson regression with robust variance estimates.

Linear modelling:
Poisson
regression with robust variance estimates. Relative risks were adjusted for all sociodemographic and physical variables. Following confounders were considered: obstetrical exposures, age, ethnicity, parity, weight, smoking, level of education, marital status, religion, type of health insurance.
The occurrence of severe sexual dysfunction was statistically significantly higher after pCS than SVB (36.2% versus 26.4%, respectively).

Median FSFI score for all items investigating pain
during or following sexual intercourse were significantly worse after pCS (median score = 4.78 (IQR not reported) than SVB (median score = 5.14 (IQR not reported). P = 0.002

After adjustment for all sociodemographic and physical variables:
Item 2 of the FSFI (low level of sexual desire) showed a significantly increased risk of presenting symptoms after pCS compared to SVB (aRR = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.96–2.50, p = 0.041).

Item 17 of the FSFI (pain during vaginal penetration about half the time or more) showed a significantly increased risk of presenting symptoms after pCS compared to SVB (aRR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.10–3.85, p = 0.001).

Item 18 of the FSFI (pain following vaginal penetration more than half the time) showed a significantly increased risk of presenting symptoms after pCS compared to SVB (aRR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.04–3.03, p = 0.027).

Item 19 of the FSFI (high level of pain following vaginal penetration) showed a significantly increased risk of presenting symptoms after pCS compared to SVB (aRR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.19–5.26, p = 0.002).
Dabiri et al.
2014 [69]
Country:
Iran

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
VBE: Mean = 27.87 (SD ± 5.64)
pCS: Mean = 28.2 (SD ± 3.64)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Cross sectionalHow:
Self-completed questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
Not reported
6 months postpartumNumber:
n = 150

Recruitment:
Primiparous women who had brought their babies for vaccination/attended the family planning clinics at health and teaching clinics in Bandar Abbas from September 2010–April 2011.
VBE:
54% (n = 81)

pCS:
46% (n = 69)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores.
Analysis:
Independent samples of t test for comparison between groups and paired t test for comparison within groups.
No significant difference in total FSFI scores and domain specific FSFI scores between pCS and VBE groups.
Dean et al.
2008 [73]
Country:
Australia

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Mean = 35 (SD not reported)

Parity:
Mean parity = 2.4
Cross
sectional
How:
Postal questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
35%
(2765/7872)
6 years postpartumNumber:
n = 2765

Recruitment:
All women who delivered between January 1994 and March 1995 in 3 maternity units (Scotland, England, New Zealand).
SVB:
51.3% (n = 1419)

AVB:
30.8% (n = 852)

CS:
9.7% (n = 9.7%)
Non-transformed GRISS domain scores
(modified)
Analysis:
three-way ANOVA

ANOVA:
Adjustment for parity, current pelvic floor muscle exercises, urinary and faecal incontinence.
Women who had CS had a significantly better mean GRISS score (mean = 3.46, SD ± 1.02) when rating their vaginal tone for their own satisfaction, when compared with SVB/VBE (mean = 3.21, SD ± 0.99) and AVB groups (mean = 3.17, SD ± 1.09). p ≤ 0.001

Women who had CS had a significantly better mean GRISS score (mean = 3.66, SD ± 0.98) when rating their vaginal tone for their partner’s satisfaction, when compared with SVB/VBE (mean = 3.45, SD ± 0.97) and AVB groups (mean = 3.41, SD ± 1.02). p ≤ 0.01.

After adjustment:
Results remained significant after adjustment.
Ghorat et al.
2017 [70]
Country:
Iran

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Mean = 31.81
(SD ± 6.31)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Cross sectionalHow:
Questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
Not reported
2 years postpartumNumber:
n = 177

Recruitment
Random sampling from every primiparous woman who had delivered 2 years before 2014, in Sabzevar Hospitals.
SVB/
VBE:
69.5%

CS:
30.5%
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores

FSFI dichotomous cut off score for sexual dysfunction: 28

FSFI domain dichotomous cut off scores for sexual dysfunction:
Sexual pain = 3.8
Sexual desire = 3.3
Sexual arousal = 3.4
Lubrication = 3.7
Orgasm = 3.4
Sexual satisfaction = 3.8
Analysis:
Chi square, student t-test and Fischer exact test.
Mean FSFI score of arousal domain was significantly worse in SVB/VBE group (mean = 3.39, SD ± 1.11) compared to CS group (mean = 3.76, SD ± 1.1), p ≤ 0.05.
Hosseini et al.
2012 [72]
Country:
Iran

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
VBE: Mean = 25
(SD ± 3.2)
pCS: Mean = 25
(SD ± 3.4)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Cross sectionalHow:
hysician-administered questionnaire in interview format

Inclusion rate:
85.5% (213/249)
6 to 24 months postpartumNumber:
n = 213

Recruitment:
From June 2009 until September 2010, women who had been referred to health clinics at Tehran University of Medical Sciences were recruited.
VBE:
53.5% (n = 114)

pCS:
46.5% (n = 99)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores
Analysis:
Student’s two tailed t test, Chi square test and one-way ANOVA

Multivariable regression model:
To adjust for confounders (age, duration of marriage, educational level, contraceptive method and job)
No significant differences in total FSFI or FSFI domain scores were found between VBE and pCS groups.
Mohammed et al.
2016 [76]
Country:
Egypt

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
18–35 (range)

Parity:
Not reported
Cross
sectional
How:
Questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
Not reported
12 months postpartumNumber:
n = 300

Recruitment:
Females attending the Dermatology & Venereology Outpatient Clinic of Al-Azhar University Hospitals and the Family Planning Clinic of Zagazig General Hospital
SVB:
17.3% (n = 52)

VBE:
34.7% (n = 104)

AVB:
2.0% (n = 6)

pCS:
40.7% (n = 122)

eCS:
5.3% (n = 16)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores.
Analysis:
Chi-square test, paired t test and ANOVA were used
Mean score for FSFI domain desire was significantly worse at one year postpartum in AVB group (mean = 3.0, SD ± 0.0) compared to other mode of birth groups (SVB mean = 3.3, SVB SD ± 0.42; VBE mean = 3.6, VBE SD ± 0.4; pCS mean = 3.6, pCS SD ± 0.4; eCS mean = 3.9, eCS SD ± 0.4), p ≤ 0.001

Mean score for FSFI domain arousal was significantly worse at 1 year postpartum in AVB group (mean = 0.5, SD ± 0.3) compared to other mode of birth groups (SVB mean = 3.6, SVB SD ± 0.2; VBE mean = 3.8, VBE SD ± 0.4; pCS mean = 3.4, pCS SD ± 0.5; eCS mean = 4.2, eCS SD ± 0.4), p ≤ 0.001

Mean score for FSFI domain orgasm was significantly worse at 1 year postpartum in SVB group (mean = 3.9, SD ± 0.6) compared to other mode of birth groups (VBE mean = 4.3, VBE SD ± 0.5; AVB mean = 4.5, AVB SD ± 0.2; pCS mean = 4.3, pCS SD ± 0.6; eCS mean = 4.2, eCS SD ± 0.3), p ≤ 0.001

Mean score for FSFI domain satisfaction was significantly worse at 1 year postpartum for pCS group (mean = 3.5, SD ± 0.4) compared to other mode of birth groups (SVB mean = 3.9, SVB SD ± 0.6; VBE mean = 3.7, VBE SD ± 0.6; AVB mean = 3.7, AVB SD ± 0.2; eCS mean = 3.8, eCS SD ± 0.7), p = 0.003.

Mean score for FSFI domain pain was significantly worse at 1 year postpartum in AVB group (mean = 2.9, SD ± 0.3) compared to other mode of birth groups (SVB mean = 4.3, SVB SD ± 0.7; VBE mean = 3.4, VBE SD ± 0.6; pCS mean = 3.6, pCS SD ± 0.6; eCS mean = 3.6, eCS SD ± 0.8), p ≤ 0.001

No significant difference for an total mean FSFI score between modes of birth groups.
Saydam et al.
2017 [63]
Country:
Turkey

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Not reported

Parity:
50.7% primiparous; 49.3% multiparous
Cross
sectional
How:
interview

Inclusion rate: 78.4% (142/181)
6–12 months postpartumNumber:
n = 142

Recruitment:
Women who gave birth in past year who were registered at the Public Health Training and Research Centers (75. Yil, Adalet and Postacilar) in Izmir.
SVB:
Total: 45.8% (n = 65)
Primiparous: 21.8%
Multiparous: 23.9%

CS:
Total: 54.2% (n = 77)
Primiparous: 28.9%
Multiparous: 25.4%
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores

FSFI dichotomous score: scores ≤26.55 are considered as female sexual dysfunction
Analysis:
Chi-square test, independent sample t-test and logistic regression analysis
No significant difference in total or domain specific FSFI scores between SVB and CS groups.
Zgliczynska et al., 2021 [77] Country:
Poland

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Mean = 27.1 (SD ± 4.4); 18–39 (range)

Parity:
64.9% primiparous; 35.1% multiparous
Cross
sectional
How:
online survey

Inclusion rate:
53.3%
(231/433)
T3:
7–9 months postpartum

T4:
10–12 months postpartum
Number:
n = 433

Recruitment:
Websites and forums dedicated to motherhood, pregnancy and childbirth between June–November 2018
SVB:
16.2%

VB with perineal trauma (VBE/perineal tear/
AVB): 47.8%

CS:
36.0%
FSFI total score

FSFI dichotomous score: sexual dysfunction was defined with a score <26.55
Analysis:
Mann–Whitney U test, ANOVA Kruskal–Wallis one way analysis of variance, post hoc Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons, Wilcoxon signed-rank, crosstabulation and Chi-squared test.

Multiple logistic regression:
Univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression model using backward stepwise construction were used
Median FSFI score for arousal (FSFI domain) was significantly worse at 7–9 months in CS (median = 4.5, IQR = 3.3, 5.1) compared to SVB (median = 5.1, IQR = 3.9, 5.7) and VB with perineal tear (median = 4.8, IQR = 4.2, 5.7), p = 0.032.

Increased risk of female sexual dysfunction in first year after birth in vaginal labour with vacuum/forceps (OR = 3.98, 95%CI = 1.14–13.97, p = 0.031).

No significant differences for total FSFI score (median) found between mode of birth groups at 10–12 months postpartum.

After adjustment in multivariate analysis:
No significant association between mode of birth and sexual dysfunction
Baytur et al.
2005 [59]
Country:
Turkey

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
VBE: Mean = 31.0, (SD ± 5.29)
pCS: Mean = 29.1 (SD ± 4.4)

Parity:
VBE: 80% primiparous; 20% multiparous
pCS: 76% primiparous; 24% multiparous
Case
control
How:
In person interview.

Inclusion rate:
47%
(53/100)
≥2 years postpartumNumber:
n = 53 + 15 controls

Recruitment:
Cases: Women who gave birth in Celal Bayar University School of Medicine Obstetrics Department were randomly selected from obstetric records.
Controls: 15 nulliparous attending gynaecology clinics with other symptoms agreed to participate.
VBE:
60.4% (n = 32)

pCS:
39.6% (n = 21)

No birth
(control):
n = 15
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores
Analysis:
The Mann–Whitney U-test and the Chi-square test
No significant difference in total and domain specific FSFI scores were found between pCS and VBE
Cai et al. 2014 [84] Country:
China

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
VBE: Mean = 36.7 (SD ± 5.2)
CS: Mean = 34.5 (SD ± 3.8)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Case-controlHow:
Interview questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
Not reported
At least 1 year since birthNumber:
n = 165

How:
Questionnaire given during initial visit to Department of Infertility and Sexual Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University for fertility issues, from January 2011 to May 2011.
VBE:
53.3% (n = 88)

CS:
46.7% (n = 77)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores
Analysis:
Chi-square test and t-test
No significant differences in total FSFI scores or domain specific FSFI scores between mode of birth groups.
Doğan et al.
2017 [60]
Country:
Turkey

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Mean = 30.4
(SD ± 2.4)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Case
control
How:
Face to face interview

Inclusion rate:
Not reported
≥5 years postpartumNumber:
n = 150

Recruitment:
Selected from those who admitted to outpatient clinic of GATA Haydarpasa Training Hospital for routine control or with fertility desire in the period between January and July 2015.
VBE:
33.3% (n = 50)

pCS:
33.3% (n = 50)

No birth (control):
33.3% (n = 50)
FSFI total score

FSFI categorised scores for measure of sexual dysfunction: 0–15: severe; 16–25: moderate; 26–35: mild; ≥36: normal
Analysis:
One-way ANOVA and Chi-square test were used
Mean total FSFI score was significantly worse for VBE group (mean = 65.1, SD ± 10.2) compared to pCS group (mean = 70.5, SD ± 13.3) and control group (mean = 73.4, SD ± 8.8). p ≤ 0.001

Mean FSFI score for sexual desire domain was significantly worse for VBE group (mean = 6.1, SD ± 1.7) compared to control group (mean = 7.2, SD ± 1.5). p ≤ 0.01

Mean FSFI score for arousal domain was significantly worse for VBE group (mean = 12.4, SD ± 2.3) compared to pCS group (mean = 14.8, SD ± 2.8) and control group (mean = 15.7, SD ± 2.5). p ≤ 0.001

Mean FSFI score for orgasm domain was significantly worse for VBE group (mean = 10.6, SD ± 2.5) compared to pCS group (mean = 11.8, SD ± 2.6) and control group (mean = 12.4, SD ± 1.9). p ≤ 0.001

No significant differences in FSFI total score or FSFI domain specific scores between pCS and control groups.

No groups suffered from any degree of sexual dysfunction.
Crane et al.
2013 [65]
Country:
USA

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
AVB: Mean = 28.8 (SD ± 5.7)
CS: Mean = 29.5 (SD ± 5.0)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Retrospective cohortHow:
Telephone interview

Inclusion rate:
32.3%
(109/337)
1 year postpartumNumber:
n = 109

Recruitment: Women with second-stage arrest in first pregnancy who delivered between January 2009–May 2011 at 2 different institutions were identified by obstetric database using codes.
AVB:
48.6% (n = 53)

pCS:
33% (n = 36)

CS after failed AVB:
18.3% (n = 20)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores

FSFI dichotomous score: sexual dysfunction was defined with a score < 26.55
Analysis:
Chi-square test, Fisher exact test for categorical data and student t test for continuous data
Mean FSFI score for orgasm domain was significantly better in pCS group (mean = 4.52, SD not reported) compared to AVB group (mean = 3.78, SD not reported), p = 0.05.

Mean FSFI score for overall sexual satisfaction was significantly better in pCS group (mean = 4.70, SD not reported) compared to AVB group (mean = 4.16, SD not reported), p = 0.04.

No significant difference in amount of sexual dysfunction between AVB and pCS groups.
Fehniger et al.
2013 [66]
Country:
USA

Ethnicity:
White/Caucasian:
48% (n = 526)
Black/African American:
20% (n = 214)
Asian/Asian-American:
16% (171)
Latina/Hispanic:
17% (n = 183)

Age (at time of questionnaire ≥10 years postpartum):
Mean = 56.3
(SD ± 8.7)

Parity:
12% primiparous; 88% multiparous
Retrospective cohortHow:
Self-administered questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
59.3%
(1094/1844)
95%:
≥10 years postpartum
Number:
n = 1094

Recruitment:
Long-term enrolees in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) who were participating in Reproductive Risks of Incontinence Study at Kaiser 2, January 2003 to January 2008.
SVB/VBE/AVB:
86% (n = 945)

CS:
7% (n = 75)
FSFI domains
(modified)
Multivariable logistic regression:
Models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, partner status, self-reported general health, diabetes status.
After adjustment:
Increased risk of low sexual desire or interest >= 10 years postpartum in those who underwent AVB, compared to those who did not (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.04–1.83, p < 0.05).
Gungor et al.
2007 [61]
Country:
Turkey

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
SVB/VBE/AVB: Mean = 27.9
(SD ± 3.3)
CS: Mean = 28.5
(SD ± 3.9)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Retrospective cohortHow:
Self-reported questionnaire at clinic.

Inclusion rate:
90%
(135/150)
≥12 months postpartum

Time since birth (years):
VD/
VBE/
AVB:
Mean = 5.6, SD ± 3.5
CS:
Mean = 4.8, SD ± 2.7
Number:
n = 135

Recruitment:
From December 2005 until March 2006, primiparous women with a prior live birth were identified upon their presentation at the outpatient desk and were asked to participate.
SVB/
VBE/
AVB:
66.6% (n = 90)

CS:
33.3% (n = 45)
GRISS overall sexual function score

GRISS domain scores:
1–4: degrees of sexual satisfaction
5–9: degrees of sexual dissatisfaction
Analysis:
Chi-square test and Mann–Whitney U-test were used
No significant differences in total or domain specific GRISS scores between SVB/VBE/AVB and CS groups.
Klein et al.
2015 [75]
Country:
Austria

Ethnicity:
Caucasian

Age:
VD: Mean = 29.6
(SD ± 5.68)
CS: Mean = 33.3
(SD ± 5.24)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Retrospective cohortHow:
Questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
63.9%
(99/155)
12–18 months postpartumNumber:
n = 99

Recruitment:
All primiparous women who delivered consecutively at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical University of Vienna in a period of 10 months were identified using the birth register.
SVB:
56% (n = 55)

pCS:
44% (n = 44)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores
Analysis:
Mann–Whitney U-test

Multivariate regression analysis:
To control for confounders (BMI, age, education)
No significant differences in total or domain specific FSFI scores between SVB and CS groups.
Song et al.
2014 [79]
Country:
Japan

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Mean = 33.2
(SD ± 4.4)

Parity:
Not reported
Retrospective cohortHow:
Postal questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
86.7%
(435/502)
6 months postpartumNumber:
n = 435

Recruitment:
From November 2011 until June 2013, mothers were recruited during postnatal examination at Kawasaki University Hospital and related hospitals.
SVB/
VBE:
83.7% (n = 364)

AVB:
5% (n = 21)

pCS:
5% (n = 23)

eCS:
6% (n = 27)
SFQ28 domain scoresAnalysis:
ANOVA, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman rank analysis.

Multivariable regression analysis:
To control for confounders (age).
Mean SFQ8 score for partner domain was significantly worse in SVB/VBE group (mean = 8.7, SD ± 2.2) compared to AVB group (mean = 9.1, SD ± 1.5).

After adjustment in multivariable regression analysis:
Caesarean section was a significant predictor of the domains of desire (p = 0.015), arousal (lubrication) (p = 0.032), and arousal (cognitive) (p = 0.036).
Baksu et al.
2006 [64]
Country:
Turkey

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
15–35 (range)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
In person questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
80.5%
(248/308)
T1:
6 months postpartum
Number:
n = 248

Recruitment:
Primiparous women who applied to antenatal clinic from January–July 2004 and gave birth in clinic.
VBE:
62.9% (n = 156)

pCS:
37.1% (n = 92)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores
Analysis:
t test was used for comparison between mode of birth groups.
At 6 months, VBE had a significantly worse mean total FSFI score (mean = 22.16, SD ± 3.68) compared to pCS (mean = 28.32, SD ± 6.53), p = ≤ 0.001

At 6 months, VBE had a significantly worse mean FSFI score for FSFI domains arousal (VBE = 3.75 ± 0.86, pCS = 4.83 ± 0.64), lubrication (VBE = 4.2 ± 0.3, pCS = 5.04 ± 0.67), orgasm (VBE = 3.36 ± 0.37, pCS = 5.48 ± 0.48), satisfaction (VBE = 4.92 ± 0.31, pCS = 5.5 ± 0.52), and pain (VBE = 3.12 ± 0.32, pCS = 4.8 ± 0.7) when compared to pCS. p ≤ 0.001
Chang et al. 2015 [85]Country:
Taiwan

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
VB: Mean = 32.1 (SD ± 0.3)
CS: Mean = 33.9 (SD ± 0.3)

Parity:
VB: 53.5% primiparous
CS: 53.6% primiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Not reported

Inclusion rate:
47.7%
(351/736)
T3:
6 months postpartum

T4:
12 months postpartum
Number:
n = 351

Recruitment:
When they gave birth in maternity unit of a medical centre in Taiwan, between 2010 and 2011.
VB:
57.0% (n = 200)

CS:
43.0% (n = 151)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores

High FSFI values were defined with a score >26.55
Analysis:
Differences in demographic characteristics explored with MANOVA.

MANCOVA:
Comparisons of sexual function between vaginal and caesarean groups, adjusting for significant differences in demographic covariates. Covariates included: gestational age, personal income, age, current body mass index (BMI), personal income, feeding type, gestational age of the baby, and neonatal care unit attended.
No significant differences in total FSFI scores, domain specific FSFI scores or rate of high FSFI scores between mode of birth groups.
Dahlgren et al. 2022 [86]Country:
Sweden

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
<25: 11.27% (n = 79)
25–29:
48.2% (n = 338)
30–34:
32.1% (n = 225)
≥35:
8.4% (n = 59)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Web-based questionnaires

Inclusion rate:
66.8% (701/958)
T2:
12 months postpartum
Number:
n = 701

Recruitment:
Nulliparous women registering for maternity health care in the region Örebro County, Sweden, were invited to participate, from 1 October 2014 to 1 October 2017.
SVB:
69.0% (n = 658)

AVB:
15.5% (n = 148)

CS:
15.5% (n = 148)
PISQ-12 total score

PISQ-12 sub scores (satisfaction-question 4 of questionnaire; dyspareunia- question 5 of questionnaire)
Generalised estimating equations:
Coefficients and odds ratios obtained using GEEs. Adjusted estimates controlled for age, education, smoking, BMI, self-reported health, delivery mode, episiotomy, mode of start of delivery, gestational age, degree of perineal tear, high vaginal tear and breastfeeding 12 months postpartum.
AVB increased the odds of dyspareunia when compared to SVB (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.19, 2.89).

No significant difference in total PISQ-12 score between mode of birth groups.

No significant difference in satisfaction PISQ-12 sub-score between mode of birth groups.

After adjustment:
Association between AVB and increased odds of dyspareunia no longer significant.

After alternative adjusted analysis (excluded perineal tear, high vaginal tear, episiotomy, mode of delivery start):
AVB increased the odds of dyspareunia when compared to SVB (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.01, 2.63).
de Sousa et al.,
2021 [88]
Country:
Portugal

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
SVB: 26–36 (range); median = 32
AVB: 28–34 (range); median = 32

Parity:
SVB: 46.2% primiparous; 53.8% multiparous
AVB: 84.7% primiparous; 15.3% multiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Online survey

Inclusion rate:
T2:
37%
(72/196)
T3:
52%
(102/196)
T2:
6 months postpartum

T3:
12 months postpartum
Number:
n = 196

Recruitment:
Women 3 days postpartum from giving birth at Department of Obstetrics and Gynacologie Hospital de Braga in period February–October 2018
SVB:
33.16%

AVB:
66.84%
FSFI total score


FSFI dichotomous score: sexual dysfunction was defined with a score <26.55
Analysis:
Chi square and Fischer exact test used for categorical variables; independent t-test used for continuous variables.
Overall rate of sexual dysfunction at 6 months was 43%.

Overall rate of sexual dysfunction at 12 months was 48%.

At 12 months, pain FSFI domain was significantly worse in women with AVB (mean = 4.4, SD ± 1.4) when compared to SVB (mean = 5.1, SD ± 1.1).

At 6 months, there was no differences in FSFI total score or domains between mode of birth groups.

When exploring influence of different types of instruments used in operative vaginal birth (Thierry’s Spatulas or Kiwi Vacuum Extractor), FSFI scores did not differ between the two instruments at 6 or 12 months postpartum
de Souza et al.
2015 [74]
Country:
Australia

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Mean = 30.70 (SD not reported)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Postal questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
T1:
74%
(322/437)
T2:
65% (286/400)
T1:
6 months postpartum

T2:
12 months postpartum
Number
n = 286

Recruitment:
From antenatal clinic
Between January 2010 and July 2011.
SVB/VBE:
51.2% (n = 133)

AVB:
21.9% (n = 57)

CS:
26.9% (n = 70)
FSFI total score.

FSFI domain scores.
Analysis:
Chi-square test and Student’s t test

Linear mixed modelling (LMM):
Control for confounding factors: maternal age, maternal BMI, gestation at birth, neonatal weight, breastfeeding status and risk of postnatal depression.
No significant differences in FSFI total score or FSFI domain specific scores between mode of birth groups at any time point.
de Souza et al. 2013 [89]Country:
Not reported

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Not reported

Parity:
100% primiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Not reported

Inclusion rate:
65% (286/440)
T1:
6 months postpartum

T2:
12 months postpartum
Number:
n = 286

Recruitment:
Not reported
SVB;
52.3%

AVB:
21.3%

CS:
26.3%

VBE:
Of all vaginal births, 37.9% were VBE
FSFI total score.

FSFI domain scores.
Analysis:
Mann–Whitney or Kruskal–Wallis tests.
At 6 months postpartum, women who had a VBE had significantly worse total FSFI score, significantly worse scores for lubrication and orgasm, and significantly better scores for pain when compared to CS.

No significant differences in FSFI total score or FSFI domain specific scores between SVB, AVB or CS groups at 12 months postpartum.
Di Dedda et al.
2017 [81]
Country:
Italy

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
18–44 (range); median = 33

Parity:
59.9% primiparous
40.1% multiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
52.4% (210/401)
T1:
6 months postpartum
Number:
n = 210

Recruitment:
Women who underwent VD or CS from single urogynaecological unit, between February and July 2016
SVB/
VBE/
AVB:
Not reported

CS:
Not reported
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores
Not reportedWomen who underwent CS had significantly better total FSFI score compared to women who underwent SVB/VBE/AVB. p ≤ 0.001 (mean scores and SD not reported).

Women who underwent CS had significantly better score for FSFI domain pain compared to women who underwent SVB/VBE/AVB. p ≤ 0.001 (mean scores and SD not reported).
Kahramanoglu et al.
2017 [62]
Country:
Turkey

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
VBE: Mean = 23.6
(SD ± 1.2)
CS: Mean = 23.7
(SD ± 1.1)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
T1:
Face to face interview
T2 & T3:
Telephone interview

Inclusion rate:
T1:
83.6%
(337/403)
T2:
74.4%
(300/403)
T3:
54.1%
(218/403)
T1:
6 months postpartum

T2:
12 months postpartum

T3:
24 months postpartum
Number:
T1: n = 337
T2: n = 300
T3: n = 218

Recruitment:
All nulliparous women aged 18–45 years in stable relationships who presented to Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Suleymaniye Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, from February 2012–July 2014.
VBE:
64%
(T1)

pCS:
36%
(T1)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores
Analysis:
Student’s t test testing differences in FSFI between MOD in each timepoint.
No significant differences in total or domain specific FSFI scores between VBE and CS groups at any time point.
Lurie et al. 2013 [87] Country:
Israel

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
SVB: Mean = 27.7 (SD ± 4.8)
VBE: Mean = 28.4 (SD ± 3.9)
AVB: Mean = 27.3 (SD ± 5.7)
pCS: Mean = 31.2 (SD ± 5.6)
eCS: Mean = 29.4 (SD ± 5.4)

Parity:
SVB: Mean parity = 1.0 (SD ± 0.0)
VBE: Mean parity = 1.0 (SD ± 0.0)
AVB: Mean parity = 1.0 (SD ± 0.0)
pCS: Mean parity = 1.1 (SD ± 0.3)
eCS: Mean parity = 1.1 (SD ± 0.2)
Prospective cohortHow:
Telephone questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
82% (82/100)
T3:
6 months postpartum
Number:
n = 82

Recruitment:
Women approached on day of discharge from Maternity Ward of Edith Wolfson Medical Centre between January 2010 and February 2011.
SVB:
19.5% (n = 16)

VBE:
17.1% (n = 14)

AVB:
17.1% (n = 14)

pCS:
20.7% (n = 17)

eCS:
22.0% (n = 18)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores
Analysis:
FSFI scores were compared across delivery type using Kruskal–Wallis test.

General linear modelling:
Used to assess across-group differences
No significant differences in total or domain specific FSFI scores between mode of birth groups.
Moghadam et al.
2019 [71]
Country:
Iran

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Mean = 27.2
(SD ± 4.52)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Questionnaire conducted by midwifery experts.

Inclusion rate:
78% (107/136)
T1:
6 months postpartum

T2:
12 months postpartum
Number:
T2: n = 107

Recruitment:
Nulliparous mothers aged 18–35 years who
referred to 5 randomly selected healthcare centres in Sanandaj during 2015–2016 for infant vaccination.
VBE:
45.8% (n = 49)

CS:
54.2% (n = 58)
FSFI total score

FSFI domain scores
Analysis:
Interferential and descriptive statistics and paired t test.

Multiple logistic regression:
To adjust for confounders (age, education, job, income, infant weight, sex per week and contraceptive method)
Mean total FSFI score at 6 months postpartum was significantly worse in VBE group (mean = 24.7, SD ± 4.45) compared to CS group (mean = 26.8, SD ± 4.24), p = 0.01.

Mean score for FSFI domain sexual arousal at 6 months was significantly worse in VBE group (mean = 3.6, SD ± 0.96) compared to CS group (mean = 4.0, SD ± 0.98), p = 0.02.

Mean score for FSFI domain sexual desire at 6 months was significantly worse in VBE group (mean = 3.4, SD ± 0.87) compared to CS group (mean = 3.8, SD ± 1.006), p = 0.001.

Mean score for FSFI domain sexual desire at 12 months was significantly worse in VBE group (mean = 3.4, SD ± 0.92) compared to CS group (mean = 3.8, SD ± 0.87), p = 0.03.

After adjustment for confounders in multiple logistic regression model:
Increased odds of better total FSFI score at 6 months postpartum in CS compared to VBE (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02–1.27, p = 0.01).

Increased odds of better sexual desire FSFI score at 6 months postpartum in CS compared to VBE (OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.15–5.32, p = 0.02).
Rogers et al.
2012 [67]
Country:
USA

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Mean = 25.2
(SD ± 5.5)

Parity:
100% primiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
Total:
70%
(469/672)
VD:
74% (331/448)
CS:
62%
(138/224)
6 months postpartumNumber:
n = 469

Recruitment:
From a population of midwifery patients. Recruited midwifery patients during pregnancy, and additional cohort who underwent CS.
SVB/
VBE/
AVB:
71%

CS:
29%
FSFI total scoreMultivariate analysis:
Controlling for education, BMI and age differences between groups
After adjustment in multivariate analyses:
At 6 months postpartum, those who underwent CS had significantly worse total FSFI score (mean = 26.6, SD ±6.3) compared to those in SVB/VBE/AVB group (mean = 28.5, SD ± 5.4). p = 0.004
Spaich et al.,
2020 [78]
Country:
Germany

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
Mean = 31.2 (SD ± 5.0); 18–47 (range)

Parity:
47.3% primiparous; 52.7% multiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Questionnaires (not clear on modality

Inclusion rate:
T1:
66%
(344/522)
T2:
65%
(339/522)
T3:
58%
(303/522)
T2:
6 months postpartum

T3:
12 months postpartum
Number:
n = 522

Recruitment:
During peripartum hospitalisation of women giving birth in period 2013–2018 at University Medical Centre Mannheim
SVB:
50.4% (n = 263)

VBE:
7.28% (n = 38)

AVB:
7.9% (n = 41)

CS:
41.8% (n = 218)
FSFI total score

SAQ total score
Analysis:
One way ANOVAs, chi square test on Fisher’s exact test, nonparametric tests (Kruskal–Wallis, Friedman). When significant group differences were found, variables were entered as possible covariates in subsequent analysis.
No significant differences in FSFI total score or SAQ total score between mode of birth groups at any time point.
Szollosi et al.,
2021 [83]
Country:
Hungary

Ethnicity:
Not reported

Age:
At 6 months postpartum: Mean = 31.8 (SD ± 4.7)
At 12 months postpartum: Mean = 31.44 (SD ± 3.6)

Parity:
At 6 months postpartum: 53.7% primiparous; 46.3% multiparous
At 12 months postpartum: 54.7% primiparous; 45.3% multiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Online questionnaires
Inclusion rate:
729 invited

Inclusion rate:
T2:
77.0%
(214/278)
T3:
34.2%
(95/278)
T2:
6 months postpartum

T3:
12 months postpartum
Number:
3 months: n = 293
6 months: n = 214
12 months: n = 95

Recruitment:
Women giving birth in period June 2018-August 2019 in 3 obstetric institutes in Budapest were personally invited within 3 days postpartum
SVB:
6 months = 14.01%
12 months = 16.84%

VBE:
6 months = 26.16%
12 months = 34.73%

pCS:
6 months = 27.10%
12 months = 26.31%

eCS:
6 months = 19.62%
12 months = 12.63%
FSFI, sexual dysfunction was defined with a dichotomous score <26.55Analysis:
Pearson chi square test and Mann–Whitney U test. Variables that were in significant connection with sexual dysfunction in univariate logistic regression model were examined in multivariate logistic regression model.

Multivariate logistic regression modelling:
Adjustment made for parity, age, and education level
No significant differences in total FSFI scores between mode of birth groups at any time point.

Mode of births were not associated with sexual dysfunction at any time point.
Yee et al.
2013 [68]
Country:
USA

Ethnicity:
Caucasian: 51,9% (n = 67)
African America:
26,4% (n = 34)
Latina: 7,8% (n = 10)
Asian: 13,2% (n = 17)
Other: 0,8% (n = 1)

Age:
Mean = 32.1
(SD ± 6.0)

Parity:
34.9% primiparous; 65.1% multiparous
Prospective cohortHow:
Telephone & in person questionnaire

Inclusion rate:
80.6%
(129/160)
T1:
6–8 months postpartum
Number:
n = 129

Recruitment:
From August 2008 to March 2011, letters of invitation with opt-in/opt-out cards were sent to all pregnant women obtaining prenatal care at the University of California, San Francisco obstetrics practice.
SVB/
VBE/
AVB:
76.7% (n = 99)

CS:
23.3% (n = 30)
Modified SHOW-QAnalysis:
Chi-square and t test were used

Multiple linear regression:
To identify predictors of postpartum sexual function (age, race, education, marital status, parity, breastfeeding status and depression)
No significant differences in mean SHOW-Q scores between CS and SVB/VBE/AVB groups.
SVB = spontaneous vaginal birth; VBE = vaginal birth with episiotomy; AVB = assisted vaginal birth; pCS = planned (elective) caesarean section; eCS = emergency caesarean section; VB = vaginal birth (unspecified); CS = caesarean section (unspecified).
Table 2. Quality assessment using NOS.
Table 2. Quality assessment using NOS.
StudySelectionComparability OutcomeOverall Rating
Representativeness of Exposed CohortSelection of the Non-Exposed Cohort from Same Source as Exposed CohortAscertainment of ExposureOutcome of Interest Was Not Present at Start of StudyComparison of Modes of Birth including Specification, e.g., Differentiation between Types of Vaginal Birth (Spontaneous Vaginal Birth, Vaginal Birth with Episiotomy, Assisted
Vaginal Birth) and Types of Caesarean Section (Planned, Emergency)
Controls for Any Additional Factor (Demographics, Health, etc.)Assessment of OutcomeFollow-Up Long Enough for Outcome to OccurAdequacy of Follow-Up (Rate of Women included in Analysis at Follow Up Point)
Baksu et al.
2006 [64]
Women who applied to antenatal clinic are likely to be representative of pregnant women ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth details were ascertained from hospital records after birth ★Pre-birth sexual function was measured ★Modes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate was 80.5%. Small number of participants lost unlikely to introduce bias ★Good
Barbara et al.
2016 [80]
Women recruited before discharge from Department of Women’s and Children’s Health are likely to representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth was retrieved from hospital records ★Pre-birth sexual function was measured ★Comparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth and vaginal birth with episiotomy.Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% but description of those lost was provided ★Good
Baud et al.,
2020 [82]
Women whose details were in obstetric database are likely to be representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data retrieved from obstetric database, which was collected from hospital records ★Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedModes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
Baytur et al.
2005 [59]
Women randomly selected from obstetric records are likely to be representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data retrieved from obstetric records ★Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedModes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
Cai et al.
2014 [84]
Women who attended a clinic for fertility issues are somewhat representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★No description of how mode of birth data was ascertainedPre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedComparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between planned caesarean section and emergency caesarean section.Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate not statedFair
Chang et al.
2015 [85]
Women who gave birth in a maternity unit are likely to be representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data retrieved from medical records ★Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedComparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between different types of vaginal birth (spontaneous, with episiotomy or assisted) and caesarean section (planned or emergency)Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% but description of those lost was provided ★Good
Crane et al.
2013 [65]
Women identified in obstetric database are likely to be representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data retrieved from online medical records ★Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedModes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
Dabiri et al.
2014 [69]
Women who brought children for vaccination are likely to be representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data was self-reported by patients.Women with sexual dysfunction prior to pregnancy were excluded ★Modes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate not statedGood
Dahlgren et al.
2022 [86]
Women registering for maternity health care are likely to be representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data retrieved from online database ★Pre-birth sexual function was measured ★Comparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between planned caesarean section and emergency caesarean section.Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
De Sousa et al.
2021 [88]
Women who gave birth in an obstetric and gynaecology department are likely to representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth was ascertained from medical records ★Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedModes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
De Souza et al.
2015 [74]
Women who presented to an antenatal clinic are likely to be representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth was ascertained from medical records ★Pre-birth sexual function was measured ★Comparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between different types of vaginal birth (spontaneous or with episiotomy) and caesarean section (planned or emergency)Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
De Souza et al.
2013 [89]
No description of the derivation of the cohortAll women came from the same source ★Mode of birth was ascertained from hospital database ★Pre-birth sexual function was measured ★Comparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between planned caesarean section and emergency caesarean section.Additional factors were not controlled for in study design or analysis.Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedPoor
Dean et al.
2008 [73]
Women who gave birth in one of 3 different maternity units are likely to be representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth was ascertained from medical records ★Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedComparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between planned caesarean section and emergency caesarean section.Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% but description of those lost was provided ★Good
Di Dedda et al.
2017 [81]
Women who gave birth in a urogynaecological unit are likely to be representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data was self-reported by patients.Women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were excluded ★Comparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between different types of vaginal birth (spontaneous, with episiotomy or assisted) and caesarean section (planned or emergency)Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
Doğan et al.
2016 [60]
Women who presented to a clinic with fertility desire are somewhat representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★No description of how mode of birth data was ascertainedPre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedModes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate not statedFair
Fehniger et al.
2013 [66]
Enrolees in study who were participating in a reproductive study are somewhat representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth was ascertained from medical records ★Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedComparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between different types of vaginal birth (spontaneous or with episiotomy) and caesarean section (planned or emergency)Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
Ghorat et al.
2017 [70]
A random sample of women who had given birth in 1 of many hospitals is representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data was self-reported by patients.Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedComparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between different types of vaginal birth (spontaneous or with episiotomy) and caesarean section (planned or emergency)Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate not statedFair
Gungor et al.
2007 [61]
Women who presented to outpatient desk who had a prior birth are representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data was self-reported by patients.Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedComparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between different types of vaginal birth (spontaneous, with episiotomy or assisted) and caesarean section (planned or emergency)Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate was 90%. Small number of participants lost unlikely to introduce bias ★Fair
Hosseini et al.
2012 [72]
Women who had been referred to health clinics are somewhat representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth was ascertained from structured interview ★Women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were excluded ★Modes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate was 85.5%. Small number of participants lost unlikely to introduce bias ★Good
Kahramanoglu et al.
2017 [62]
Women in stable relationships who presented to health clinics are representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★No description of how mode of birth data was ascertainedPre-birth sexual function was measured ★Modes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
Klein et al.
2015 [75]
Women identified in birth register who gave birth consecutively at a tertiary care centre serving high-risk pregnancies with different pregnancy-associated complications are somewhat representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★No description of how mode of birth data was ascertainedWomen with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were excluded ★Modes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
Lurie et al.
2013 [87]
Women who were discharged after birth in a maternity ward are likely to be representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★No description of how mode of birth data was ascertainedPre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedModes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate was 82%. Small number of participants lost unlikely to introduce bias ★Fair
Moghadam et al.
2019 [71]
Mothers referred from 5 randomly selected centres are representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data was self-reported by patients.Pre-birth sexual function was measured ★Modes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
Mohammed et al.
2014 [76]
The married women included in this study are only somewhat representative of women who have given birth because of the high number of women who refused to participate because of their views on discussing their sexual life ★All women came from the same source ★No description of how mode of birth data was ascertainedPre-birth sexual function was measured ★Modes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate not statedGood
Rogers et al.
2012 [67]
Midwifery patients recruited during pregnancy are representative of women who had given birth ★All women came from the same source ★No description of how mode of birth data was ascertainedPre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedComparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between different types of vaginal birth (spontaneous, with episiotomy or assisted) and caesarean section (planned or emergency)Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedFair
Saydam et al.
2017 [63]
Women who gave birth and are registered at research centres are somewhat representative of women who had given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data was self-reported by patients.Presence of pre-birth sexual dysfunction was ascertained★Comparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between planned caesarean section and emergency caesarean section.Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedFair
Song et al.
2014 [79]
Women recruited during postnatal examination are representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data was self-reported by patients.Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedComparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth and vaginal birth with episiotomyAdditional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate was 86.7%. Small number of participants lost unlikely to introduce bias ★Fair
Spaich et al.
2020 [78]
Women recruited during peripartum hospitalisation are somewhat representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★No description of how mode of birth data was ascertainedPre-birth sexual function was measured ★Comparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between planned caesarean section and emergency caesarean section.Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
Szollosi et al.
2021 [83]
Women giving birth in obstetric centres are somewhat representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data was self-reported by patients.Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedModes of birth compared and specified ★Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedFair
Yee et al.
2013 [68]
Women obtaining prenatal care from hospital are representative of women who have given birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth was ascertained from structured interview ★Pre-birth sexual function was not measured and women with sexual dysfunction prior to birth were not excludedComparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between different types of vaginal birth (spontaneous, with episiotomy or assisted) and caesarean section (planned or emergency)Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate was 80.6%. Small number of participants lost unlikely to introduce bias ★Good
Zinczenko et al.
2021 [77]
Recruitment from websites dedicated to pregnancy etc are somewhat representative of women giving birth ★All women came from the same source ★Mode of birth data was self-reported by patients.Pre-birth sexual function was measured ★Comparison of modes of birth but no specific differentiation between different types of vaginal birth (with episiotomy or assisted) and caesarean section (planned or emergency)Additional factors were controlled for in study design or analysis ★Self-reported questionnaire ★Follow up at ≥6 months postpartum ★Follow up rate <80% and no description of those lost was providedGood
Good quality
Fair quality
Poor quality
Table 3. Medium-term associations between specific mode of birth groups and sexual function (≥six months and <12 months postpartum).
Table 3. Medium-term associations between specific mode of birth groups and sexual function (≥six months and <12 months postpartum).
SVB vs. VBESVB vs. AVBSVB vs. pCSSVB vs. eCSVBE vs. AVBVBE vs. pCSVBE vs. eCSAVB vs. pCSAVB vs. eCSpCS vs. eCS
Baksu et al. 2007 [64] pCS protective 1,2,4,5,6,7
Barbara et al. 2016 [80] pCS protective 1,2,4,5
Dabiri et al. 2014 [69]
De Sousa et al. 2021 [88]
Kahramanoglu et al. 2017 [62]
Lurie et al. 2013 [87]
Spaich et al. 2020 [78]
Szollosi et al. 2021 [83]
Zgliczynska et al. 2021 [77] SVB protective 1
Adjusted association between mode of birth and sexual function
Crude association between mode of birth and sexual function
No association between mode of birth and sexual function
No association calculated between mode of birth and sexual function
SVB = spontaneous vaginal birth, VBE = vaginal birth with episiotomy, AVB = assisted vaginal birth, pCS = planned caesarean section, eCS = emergency caesarean section; Domains: 1 Total sexual function score, 2 Arousal, 4 Lubrication, 5 Orgasm, 6 Satisfaction, 7 Pain.
Table 4. Longer-term associations between specific mode of birth groups and sexual function (≥12 months postpartum).
Table 4. Longer-term associations between specific mode of birth groups and sexual function (≥12 months postpartum).
SVB vs. VBESVB vs. AVBSVB vs. pCSSVB vs. eCSVBE vs. AVBVBE vs. pCSVBE vs. eCSAVB vs. pCSAVB vs. eCSpCS vs. eCS
Baud et al. 2020 [82] SVB protective 3,7
Crane et al. 2013 [65] pCS protective 5,6
Dahlgren et al. 2022 [86] SVB protective 7
De Sousa et al. 2021 [88] SVB protective 7
Doğan et al. 2016 [60] pCS protective 1,2,5
Kahramanoglu et al. 2017 [62]
Klein et al. 2009 [75]
Mohammed et al. 2014 [76]SVB protective 6,7
VBE protective 2,3,5
SVB protective 2,3,6,7
AVB protective 5
SVB protective 2,6,7
pCS protective 3,5
SVB protective 6,7
eCS protective 2,3,5
VBE protective 2,3,7
AVB protective 5
VBE protective 2,6
pCS protective 7
VBE protective 5
eCS protective 2,3,6,7
AVB protective 5,6
pCS protective 2,3,7
AVB protective 5
eCS protective 2,3,6,7
pCS protective 5
eCS protective 2,3,6
Spaich et al. 2020 [78]
Szollosi et al. 2021 [83]
Adjusted association between mode of birth and sexual function
Crude association between mode of birth and sexual function
No association between mode of birth and sexual function
No association calculated between mode of birth and sexual function
SVB = spontaneous vaginal birth, VBE = vaginal birth with episiotomy, AVB = assisted vaginal birth, pCS = planned caesarean section, eCS = emergency caesarean section; Domains: 1 Overall sexual dysfunction, 2 Arousal, 3 Desire, 5 Orgasm, 6 Satisfaction, 7 Pain.
Table 5. Medium-term associations between combinations of modes of birth and sexual function (≥six months and <12 months postpartum).
Table 5. Medium-term associations between combinations of modes of birth and sexual function (≥six months and <12 months postpartum).
SVB vs. VB aSVB vs. CSVBE vs. CSAVB vs. VB bAVB vs. CSVB vs. CSVB vs. pCS
Barbara et al. 2016 [80] VB
protective 5
Chang et al. 2015 [85]
De Sousa et al. 2021 [88]
De Souza et al. 2015 [74]
De Souza et al. 2013 [89] VBE protective 7
CS protective 1,4,5
Di Dedda et al. 2017 [81] CS protective 1,7
Moghadam et al. 2019 [71] CS protective 1,3
Rogers et al. 2012 [67] VB protective 1
Saydam et al. 2019 [63]
Song et al. 2014 [79] AVB protective 8CS protective 2,3,4CS protective 2,3,4
Spaich et al. 2020 [78]
Yee et al. 2013 [68]
Zgliczynska et al. 2021 [77]SVB
protective 2
SVB
protective 2
CS protective 2
Adjusted association between mode of birth and sexual function
Crude association between mode of birth and sexual function
No association between mode of birth and sexual function
No association calculated between mode of birth and sexual function
SVB = spontaneous vaginal birth, VBE = vaginal birth with episiotomy, AVB = assisted vaginal birth, pCS = planned caesarean section, eCS = emergency caesarean section, VB = vaginal birth (without differentiation between SVB, VBE and AVB), CS = caesarean section (without differentiation between pCS and eCS), a No differentiation between VBE and AVB, b No differentiation between SVB and VBE; Domains: 1 Overall sexual dysfunction, 2 Arousal, 3 Desire, 4 Lubrication, 5 Orgasm, 7 Pain, 8 Satisfaction with sexual life with partner.
Table 6. Longer-term associations between combinations of modes of birth and sexual function (≥ 12 months postpartum).
Table 6. Longer-term associations between combinations of modes of birth and sexual function (≥ 12 months postpartum).
SVB vs. CSVBE vs. CSAVB vs. VB aAVB vs. CSVB vs. CS
Baytur et al. 2005 [59]
Cai et al. 2014 [84]
Chang et al. 2015 [85]
Dahlgren et al. 2022 [86]
De Souza et al. 2015 [74]
De Souza et al. 2013 [89]
Dean et al. 2008 [73]CS protective 8 CS protective 8
Fehniger et al. 2013 [66] VB protective 3CS protective 3
Ghorat et al. 2017 [70] CS protective 2
Gungor et al. 2007 [61]
Moghadam et al. 2019 [71] CS protective 3
Spaich et al. 2020 [78]
Adjusted association between mode of birth and sexual function
Crude association between mode of birth and sexual function
No association between mode of birth and sexual function
No association calculated between mode of birth and sexual function
SVB = spontaneous vaginal birth, VBE = vaginal birth with episiotomy, AVB = assisted vaginal birth, pCS = planned caesarean section, eCS = emergency caesarean section, VB = vaginal birth (without differentiation between SVB, VBE and AVB), CS = caesarean section (without differentiation between pCS and eCS), a No differentiation between SVB and VBE; Domains: 2 Arousal, 3 Desire, 8 Satisfaction with vaginal tone.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fanshawe, A.-M.; De Jonge, A.; Ginter, N.; Takács, L.; Dahlen, H.G.; Swertz, M.A.; Peters, L.L. The Impact of Mode of Birth, and Episiotomy, on Postpartum Sexual Function in the Medium- and Longer-Term: An Integrative Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5252. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075252

AMA Style

Fanshawe A-M, De Jonge A, Ginter N, Takács L, Dahlen HG, Swertz MA, Peters LL. The Impact of Mode of Birth, and Episiotomy, on Postpartum Sexual Function in the Medium- and Longer-Term: An Integrative Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(7):5252. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075252

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fanshawe, Anne-Marie, Ank De Jonge, Nicole Ginter, Lea Takács, Hannah G. Dahlen, Morris A. Swertz, and Lilian L. Peters. 2023. "The Impact of Mode of Birth, and Episiotomy, on Postpartum Sexual Function in the Medium- and Longer-Term: An Integrative Systematic Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 7: 5252. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075252

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop