Abstract
(1) Background: Sexual function can be affected up to and beyond 18 months postpartum, with some studies suggesting that spontaneous vaginal birth results in less sexual dysfunction. This review examined the impact of mode of birth on sexual function in the medium- (≥6 months and <12 months postpartum) and longer-term (≥12 months postpartum). (2) Methods: Literature published after January 2000 were identified in PubMed, Embase and CINAHL. Studies that compared at least two modes of birth and used valid sexual function measures were included. Systematic reviews, unpublished articles, protocols and articles not written in English were excluded. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. (3) Results: In the medium-term, assisted vaginal birth and vaginal birth with episiotomy were associated with worse sexual function, compared to caesarean section. In the longer-term, assisted vaginal birth was associated with worse sexual function, compared with spontaneous vaginal birth and caesarean section; and planned caesarean section was associated with worse sexual function in several domains, compared to spontaneous vaginal birth. (4) Conclusions: Sexual function, in the medium- and longer-term, can be affected by mode of birth. Women should be encouraged to seek support should their sexual function be affected after birth.
Keywords:
delivery; obstetric; pregnancy; sexual behaviour; sexual health; physiological; postpartum period; mothers; midwifery 1. Introduction
Birth can have profound effects on women’s lives, including on their sexual function in the longer-term. Decreased sexual functioning is an important indicator of maternal morbidity [1], and determinant of quality of life in women of reproductive age; sexual dysfunction rates were found to be up to 64% at six months postpartum, and that approximately 6.4% of women experienced no physical pleasure in their sexual relationships at 18 months postpartum [2,3,4].
The American Psychiatric Association defines sexual function as “a person’s ability to respond sexually or to experience sexual pleasure” [5]. Up until the publication of DSM-V, women’s and men’s sexual responses were thought to follow the same linear pattern (desire, arousal, pattern) [6]. It is now recognised that different genders differ in their sexual function [7]. Additionally, it is recognised that what is considered ‘normal’ sexual function varies widely among women because of the complex nature of women’s sexuality, which can be affected by psychological, physical and cultural factors [8].
An important aspect that may impact sexual function is mode of birth, which can be categorised into spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with an episiotomy, assisted vaginal birth, planned caesarean section or emergency caesarean section. Data from the Euro-Peristat study (2016) indicated that 66.2% of all births in the EU were spontaneous vaginal births, 7.5% were assisted vaginal births, 10.7% were planned caesarean sections, and 12.9% were emergency caesarean sections [9,10]. Additionally, the rate of episiotomy ranged from 16% to 38% in most countries in Europe, with Portugal, Poland, Romania and Cyprus having the highest rates [11]. More recent data show that the rate of intervention during birth is continuing to increase: in 2020/2021, 33.5% of all births in NHS hospitals in England were caesarean sections [12]. Increasing rates of caesarean sections can also be seen over the years in other European countries [13]. In North America, the caesarean section rate is 31.6%; in Latin America and the Caribbean it is 42.8%; on the continent of Africa, it is 9.2%; however, northern Africa has a caesarean section rate of 32.0%, whilst it is 5.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa [14]. In Brazil, caesarean section rates are higher than in many other countries (55.9%), with particularly high rates being observed in the private healthcare sector (72%) [15,16,17].
Despite the significant amount of literature surrounding the impact of mode of birth on postpartum sexual functioning in the short-and longer-term, there is no consensus on the association between mode of birth and sexual functioning. Several cohort studies have shown that women who have a spontaneous vaginal birth (with an intact perineum) are more likely to resume vaginal sex by six to eight weeks postpartum compared to women who have an episiotomy, an assisted vaginal birth or a caesarean section [18,19]. Another cohort study showed that, by two months postpartum, 43% of women who had a caesarean section had at least one problem whilst attempting intercourse, and that assisted vaginal birth was significantly associated with perineal pain persisting after two months postpartum when compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery [20]. However, a cohort study did not show an association between mode of birth and sexual function in the short term [21]. A cohort study showed that 35% of women suffered loss of sexual desire up to 8–9 months after birth [22]. At 16 years postpartum, a cohort study showed that, on average, women who had caesarean section had an increased frequency of sexual problems when compared to other modes of birth; however, no difference was seen in the prevalence of sexual problems when comparing spontaneous and assisted vaginal birth [23]. However, it should be noted that other factors, such as menopause, mental health and physical health, could impact postpartum sexual function in the longer-term [24,25,26,27]. Sexual (dys)function prior to pregnancy, depressive symptoms, breastfeeding status, parity and perineal tears are other potential confounders [3,20,28,29,30,31,32,33].
Systematic reviews on the association between mode of birth and postpartum sexual function have been undertaken in 2004, 2010, 2020 and 2022 [3,34,35,36]. Results from these systematic reviews varied: a review showed that caesarean section was protective of sexual function compared to vaginal birth [34], another showed a strong association between assisted vaginal birth and worse sexual function when compared to other modes of birth [35], whilst others showed no relationship between mode of birth and postpartum sexual function [3,36]. However, these reviews had several methodological shortcomings: the studies included in the reviews by Sayasneh et al. (2010) and Hicks et al. (2004) had a high heterogeneity, and they were included regardless of whether they assessed sexual functioning with a validated measure [34,35]; the review by Gutzeit et al. (2020) lacked a clear methodology, reporting no inclusion and exclusion criteria [3]; the review by Nikolaidou et al. (2022) included all available studies on the association between type of birth and female sexual function up until 12 months following the birth using established, validated tools [36], but they did not consider episiotomy in their review, which is a common birth intervention that can have a major impact on sexual functioning [11,19].
Sexual dysfunction that continues beyond six months postpartum is more likely to have an impact on maternal wellbeing: women with impaired sexual function are more likely to score worse in all quality of life domains; and women at six months postpartum with worse sexual functioning scores are more likely to have worse scores for general health and physical functioning [2,4]. Therefore, the aim of this integrative review was to examine the impact of different modes of birth, as well as episiotomy, on sexual functioning, beyond six months postpartum in the medium-term (≥6 months and <12 months postpartum) and longer-term (≥12 months postpartum).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Search Strategy
Relevant studies were identified using PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases, and searches were limited to studies published between January 2000 and February 2023. Keywords in the search included: mode of birth (e.g., vaginal birth, caesarean section), episiotomy, postpartum, and sexual function. A detailed search strategy is presented in the Appendix A. The reference lists of the studies that were selected for inclusion were also manually searched for additional studies. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020212746).
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Both quantitative and mixed method studies were eligible for inclusion in this review, including cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, case–control studies and randomised controlled trials. Systematic reviews, unpublished results or studies, protocols, studies not written in English or written prior to 2000 were excluded. In order to be included, studies must have compared at least two different modes of birth. To facilitate clinical usability of this review, as well as provide a useful framework for this review and other studies in the future, specific modes of birth were the main focus of the review. Therefore, studies that compared data on spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy, assisted vaginal birth, planned (elective) caesarean section and emergency caesarean section were included. The secondary focus of this review were comparisons that incorporated multiple modes of birth in each category, as some studies combine multiple modes of birth into one group. Therefore, studies that compared non-specific mode of birth groups such as vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy or assisted vaginal birth), vaginal birth with breech presentation, and caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) were included. Only episiotomy was considered, rather than other perineal trauma, as it is an intervention performed (or not) by a health care professional during birth, whereas other perineal trauma happens as a result of birth. In order to ensure comparability of the studies, only studies that used a validated sexual function measure were included.
2.3. Valid Measures of Sexual Function
All of the measures of sexual function used in the studies included in this review are self-reported measures. The measures contain questions/statements, to which women report on their sexual function, by rating their sexual function using a numeric/Likert scale. A measure was considered to be a valid measure for sexual function if it has undergone psychometric evaluation and its psychometric properties were found to be acceptable.
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) consists of 19 items embedded in six domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain). The theoretical range is 2.0 to 36.0, with higher total FSFI-scores indicating better sexual functioning [37]. A cut off of ≤26.55 is commonly used to report a dichotomous FSFI-score indicating sexual dysfunction [38]. The FSFI has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to be good in women with varying parity [37,39].
The Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS) for women consists of 28 items embedded in seven subscale domains (non-communication, infrequency, dissatisfaction, avoidance, non-sensuality, vaginismus, anorgasmia). The raw score is converted into a transformed score ranging between one and nine, which can be used to produce a diagnostic profile. A transformed score greater than or equal to 5 indicates sexual dysfunction [40,41,42]. The GRISS has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to be good [40].
The Sexual Health Outcomes in Women Questionnaire (SHOW-Q) has 12 items embedded in four subscales (satisfaction, orgasm, desire, pelvic problem interference). It was designed to be used on a diverse range of women, including women in same sex relationships, women who are sexually active without a partner, and sexually inactive women. All items are scored on a scale from zero to 100. For three of the subscales (satisfaction, orgasm, desire), higher scores represent better sexual function. For the final subscale (pelvic problem interference), higher scores indicate worse sexual function. After reversal of the pelvic problem interference scores, all items are totalled for an overall score with a theoretical range of zero to 400 [43]. Lower total scores indicate worse sexual functioning [43,44]. The SHOW-Q has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to acceptable in women with varying parity [44].
The Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ) has 21 items embedded in three scales (pleasure, discomfort and habit). Each question has weighted loadings to create factor scores, with high scores in the pleasure domain representing high pleasure, and low scores in the discomfort domain representing low levels of discomfort. The habit domain is a single question and the value given as the answer is the score for this domain, with more habitual regular sexual activity resulting in higher scores. Each question is rated using a four-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, with the total score ranging from 0 to 30 [45,46]. The SAQ has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to be good [47,48].
The Sexual Function Questionnaire (SFQ28) has 28 items embedded in eight domains (desire, arousal (sensation), arousal (lubrication), arousal (cognitive), orgasm, pain, enjoyment, partner (questions regarding women’s opinion of their sexual life with their partner)). Lower scores indicate increased probability of sexual dysfunction. Overall total score has a theoretical range of 14 to 170. Each domain is scored separately, with different ranges of scores indicating sexual dysfunction. For all domains, lower scores indicate worse sexual functioning [49,50]. The SFQ28 has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to be good [51].
The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) is a 12-item questionnaire that measures three domains: behavioural–emotive, physical and partner/related (questions regarding women’s opinion of their sexual life with their partner). Each item is graded on a five-point Likert scale from always (zero) to never (zero). The behavioural–emotive items are reversely scored. Higher scores indicate better sexual functioning, with a maximum total score of 48 [52,53]. The PISQ-12 has been evaluated in terms of psychometric quality, which was found to be good in women with varying parity [52,54].
2.4. Classification of the Medium- and Longer-Term Studies
Results from the sexual function measures were categorised into medium- and longer-term: studies that collected data at beyond or equal to six months postpartum and at less than 12 months postpartum were classified as medium-term, whereas those that collected data at beyond or equal to 12 months postpartum were classified as longer-term.
2.5. Selection of the Studies
Studies that were identified as potentially eligible for inclusion were exported to Rayyan, a systematic review reference management tool. Duplicates were removed. When deciding which studies to include, two researchers (AMF, NG) independently screened the titles and abstracts. From there, full texts were evaluated for their eligibility by the two researchers, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any inconsistency between researchers on whether studies should be included or not were discussed further in order to come to an agreement. If agreement could not be reached, a third author (LP) was involved in the discussion. Information on study design, location of study, descriptive characteristics of participants, types of modes of birth, the measure of sexual function, and the results of those studies related to mode of birth and sexual function was then extracted.
2.6. Quality Assessment
Quality of the included studies was assessed by two researchers (AMF, NG) independently using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) [55]. The NOS tool was “developed to assess the quality of non-randomised studies” for use in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The NOS has three domains: selection, comparability and exposure. The selection domain covers representativeness of the studied population in the community, selection of the non-exposed cohort, ascertainment of exposure, and demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at start of the study [55]. The comparability domain assesses control for confounding variables. The outcome domain covers assessment of the outcome, length of the follow up and adequacy of follow up. Each domain contains several questions with multiple choice answer options. A maximum of one star can be awarded for each question [55]. We adapted the NOS, as self-reported measures of sexual function were considered the gold standard for assessing sexual measures by the authors, since sexual function can only be reported by the person experiencing it. The NOS was adapted by awarding a star for the assessment of outcome question, in the outcome domain.
A scoring system developed by Sharmin et al. (2017) was used to group the included studies by quality score: a study was rated good quality if it scored three or four stars in selection, one or two stars in comparability, and two or three stars in outcomes. A study was rated fair quality if it scored two stars in selection, one or two stars in comparability and two or three stars in outcome. A study was rated poor quality if it scored zero or one star in selection, or zero stars in comparability, or zero or one star in outcomes [56,57]. Tabular explanations of the domains and the scoring system are presented in Tables S1 and S2 of the Supplementary Materials, respectively.
2.7. Data Extraction and Analysis
Data from the included studies was extracted and reported using the Population, Exposure, Comparator and Outcomes (PECO) framework [58]. Extracted information included the author(s), year of publication, country, population (number of participants, ethnicity, age, parity), exposure/comparator (mode of birth), outcomes (measure used to assess the level of sexual function, interval from birth to sexual function measurement) and the main findings. The main findings show the impact between modes of birth and sexual function with 1) associations (crude or adjusted): this includes odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, or relative risk with 95% confidence intervals 2) differences between modes of birth and accompanying mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) sexual function scores.
3. Results
3.1. Search
In total, 6509 studies were identified in database searches. After removing the duplicates, screening of the titles and abstracts against the inclusion and exclusion criteria was carried out, as well as checking references and similar articles, 112 studies remained. These studies were further evaluated based on the full texts, of which 31 were included in the review. A detailed overview of the search, screening and selection process is presented in a PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1). A list of the studies that were excluded after reading the full text, and the reasons for their exclusion, is presented in Table S3 of the Supplementary Materials.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart illustrating the systematic database search for articles that met the inclusion criteria.
3.2. Study Characteristics
Of the 31 included studies, 9 were cross-sectional studies (4966 women; including at least 1591 primiparous women), 3 were case–control studies (368 women; including at least 357 primiparous women), 5 were retrospective cohort studies (1872 women; including at least 474 primiparous women) and 14 were prospective cohort studies (4217 women; including at least 3338 primiparous women). The studies were published between 2005 and 2022, originating from 17 countries including Turkey [59,60,61,62,63,64], the United States of America [65,66,67,68], Iran [69,70,71,72], Australia [73,74], Austria [75], Egypt [76], Poland [77], Germany [78], Japan [79], Italy [80,81], Switzerland [82], Hungary [83], China [84], Taiwan [85], Sweden [86], Israel [87] and Portugal [88]. One study did not disclose the country of origin of the research [89]. Sample size ranged from 53 to 2765. Detailed information about the included studies is presented in Table 1 (studies are sorted by study design in the order: cross-sectional, case–control, retrospective cohort, prospective cohort).
Table 1.
Characteristics of included studies.
In the included studies, six different measures were used to assess sexual functioning. The FSFI was used in 25 studies [59,60,62,63,64,65,66,67,69,70,71,72,74,75,76,77,80,81,82,83,84,85,87,88,89]. A combination of the FSFI and SAQ was used in one study [78]. The GRISS was used in 2 studies [61,73]. The SHOW-Q was used in one study [68]. The SFQ28 was used in one study [79]. The PISQ-12 was used in one study [86]. Data in the included studies were collected by administering the valid measures of sexual function in the following ways: four studies used the postal system [73,74,79,82], nine studies used face to face structured interviews, or self-reporting in person at the clinics [59,60,61,62,63,64,71,72,84], two studies used telephone interviews to complete the questionnaire [65,87], four studies used online forums or web/based questionnaires [77,83,86,88], one study used a combination of telephone and in person questionnaires [68], and eleven studies did not specify how they administered the measures to the participants [66,67,69,70,75,76,78,80,81,85,89].
Of the 31 studies, 18 measured sexual function in the medium-term at ≥six months and <12 months postpartum (4945 women; including at least 3409 primiparous women) [62,63,64,67,68,69,71,74,77,78,79,80,81,83,85,87,88,89], 20 measured sexual function in the longer-term at ≥12 months postpartum (8643 women; including at least 3887 primiparous women) [59,60,61,62,65,66,70,71,73,74,75,76,78,82,83,84,85,86,88,89] and eight measured sexual function in both the medium-term and longer-term (2378 women; including at least 1749 primiparous women) [62,71,74,78,83,88,89,90]. One study measured sexual function between six and 24 months postpartum and did not provide an average time when sexual function was measured (213 women; all 213 women were primiparous) [72].
When comparing studies in terms of parity, 16 studies included only primiparous women (3901 primiparous women) [60,61,62,64,65,67,69,70,71,72,74,75,80,84,86,89], 14 studies included both primiparous and multiparous women (7222 women; including at least 1859 primiparous women) [59,63,66,68,73,77,78,79,81,82,83,85,87,88] and one study did not disclose the parity of the women included (300 women) [76].
There were 17 different modes of birth comparisons; the most common comparison was between vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy and assisted vaginal birth) and caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) (Table 1). None of the included studies compared modes of birth in cases of breech presentation.
3.3. Quality Assessment
Of the included studies, 21 were of a good quality, nine studies were rated as having a fair quality and one study was rated as being of a poor quality (Table 2).
Table 2.
Quality assessment using NOS.
3.4. Main Focus: Specific Mode of Birth Groups (SVB, VBE, AVB, pCS, eCS)
3.4.1. Medium-Term Outcomes (≥Six Months and <12 Months Postpartum)
Three studies showed three statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term (Table 3) [64,77,80].
Table 3.
Medium-term associations between specific mode of birth groups and sexual function (≥six months and <12 months postpartum).
One study showed a statistically significant adjusted association between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term. Planned caesarean section was associated with better total sexual functioning scores and better scores for arousal, lubrication and orgasm when compared to assisted vaginal birth [80].
Two studies showed two statistically significant crude associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term. Spontaneous vaginal birth was associated with better total sexual functioning scores when compared to assisted vaginal birth [77]. Planned caesarean section was associated with better total sexual functioning scores and better scores for arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain when compared to vaginal birth with episiotomy [64] (Table 3).
Six studies that showed no statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term [62,69,78,83,87,88] (Table 3).
3.4.2. Longer-Term Outcomes (≥12 months Postpartum)
Six studies showed 25 statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term [60,65,76,82,86,88] (Table 4).
Table 4.
Longer-term associations between specific mode of birth groups and sexual function (≥12 months postpartum).
Two studies showed two statistically significant adjusted associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term. Assisted vaginal birth was associated with increased odds of pain at 12 months postpartum, in comparison with spontaneous vaginal birth [86]. Planned caesarean section was associated with an increased risk of pain and loss of desire at six years postpartum when compared to spontaneous vaginal birth [82].
Four studies showed 23 statistically significant crude associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term. Spontaneous vaginal birth was associated with better scores pain when compared to assisted vaginal birth [88]. Vaginal birth with episiotomy was associated with worse overall sexual function and worse scores for arousal and orgasm when compared to planned caesarean section [60]. Assisted vaginal birth was associated with worse scores for orgasm and satisfaction when compared to planned caesarean section [65]. One study showed mixed results for associations between modes of birth and sexual function [76] (Table 4).
Four studies showed no statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term [62,75,78,83] (Table 4).
3.5. Secondary Focus: Non-Specific Mode of Birth Groups (Incorporated Multiple Mode of Birth Groups into One Category)
3.5.1. Medium-Term Outcomes (≥Six Months and <12 Months Postpartum)
Seven studies showed 12 statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term (Table 5) [67,71,77,79,80,81,89].
Table 5.
Medium-term associations between combinations of modes of birth and sexual function (≥six months and <12 months postpartum).
Four studies showed five statistically significant adjusted associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term. Vaginal birth with episiotomy was associated with worse total sexual functioning scores and worse sexual functioning scores for desire, compared to caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) [71]. Assisted vaginal birth was associated with worse sexual functioning scores for orgasm when compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth and vaginal birth with episiotomy) [80]. Caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) was associated with better sexual functioning scores for arousal, desire and lubrication when compared to assisted vaginal birth [79]. Vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy and assisted vaginal birth) was associated with better total sexual functioning scores when compared to caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) [67], but was associated with worse sexual functioning scores for arousal, desire and lubrication when compared to caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) [79].
Four studies showed seven statistically significant crude associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term. Spontaneous vaginal birth was associated with better sexual functioning scores for arousal, compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between vaginal episiotomy and assisted vaginal birth) and caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) [77]. Caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) was associated with better total sexual functioning scores and better scores for lubrication and orgasm yet was associated with worse scores for pain when compared to vaginal birth with episiotomy [89]. Assisted vaginal birth was associated with better scores for sexual satisfaction with partner, compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth and vaginal birth with episiotomy [79]. Caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) was associated with better total sexual functioning scores and better scores for pain and arousal, compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy and assisted vaginal birth) [77,81] (Table 5).
Six studies showed no statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the medium-term (Table 5) [63,68,74,78,85,88].
3.5.2. Longer-Term Outcomes (≥12 Months Postpartum)
Four studies showed 6 statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term (Table 6) [66,70,71,73].
Table 6.
Longer-term associations between combinations of modes of birth and sexual function (≥ 12 months postpartum).
Two studies showed four statistically significant adjusted associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term. Caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) was associated with increased satisfaction with vaginal tone when compared to spontaneous vaginal birth and assisted vaginal birth [73]. Assisted vaginal birth was associated with an increased risk of loss of desire at ≥10 years postpartum, when compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth and vaginal birth with episiotomy), and caesarean section (without differentiation between planned and emergency caesarean section) [66].
Two studies showed two statistically significant crude associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term. Caesarean section (without differentiation between pCS and eCS) was associated with better scores for desire when compared to vaginal birth with episiotomy [71], and better scores for arousal when compared to vaginal birth (without differentiation between spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth with episiotomy and assisted vaginal birth) [70].
Seven studies showed no statistically significant associations between mode of birth and sexual function in the longer-term (Table 6) [59,61,74,78,84,85,86,89].
3.6. Overall
Various factors were considered important when comparing the studies included in this review: study design, sample size, parity, adjustment for confounders, longitudinal follow up and study quality. Comparative analyses were performed to evaluate whether associations varied between the studies that differed in these factors.
When comparing the study design, a similar proportion of the studies were cohort or longitudinal studies compared to cross-sectional studies, and both categories showed mixed results without any consistent findings. There were more studies with a sample size of less than 500 participants [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,67,68,69,70,71,72,74,75,76,77,79,80,81,83,88] than those with a larger sample size (≥500) [66,73,78,82], yet no difference was seen in the results. There were no statistically significant associations between vaginal birth with episiotomy and sexual function, compared to other modes of birth, in studies that included both primiparous and multiparous women [59,63,66,68,73,77,78,79,81,82,83,87,88], whereas there were significant associations in the studies that included only primiparous women [60,61,62,64,65,67,69,70,71,72,74,75,80,84,85,86,89].
Based on the existing literature on sexual function, the confounders considered of great importance include: sexual (dys)function prior to pregnancy, (risk of) depression, breastfeeding status, parity and perineal tears [3,20,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Of the 15 studies that adjusted for any confounders in the analysis, nine adjusted for at least one of the most important confounders [68,73,74,77,80,82,83,85,86]. The other six studies adjusted for demographic and general health characteristics only [66,67,71,72,75,79]. No difference was seen in the results of the studies that adjusted for most important confounders and those that did not.
Of the longitudinal studies that were included, some showed no differences in associations between mode of birth and sexual functioning across various time points [62,74,78,83,85]. Some studies showed improved sexual function scores over time [71,77,89]. One longitudinal study showed worse sexual function scores for assisted vaginal births compared to spontaneous vaginal births for the domain pain at 12 months postpartum. This association was, however, not present at six months postpartum [88].
When comparing the results based on the quality of studies, no differences were seen in associations between studies that were of poor, fair and good quality.
4. Discussion
The main focus of our review was to examine the impact of specific mode of birth on medium- and longer-term sexual functioning. Our review shows that there are significant associations between mode of birth and women’s sexual function in both the medium- and longer-term. Adjusted associations showed that: assisted vaginal birth was associated with worse sexual function (overall sexual function, and arousal and lubrication domains) when compared to planned caesarean section, in the medium-term (≥six months and <12 months postpartum); in the longer-term (≥12 months postpartum), spontaneous vaginal birth was associated with better sexual function when compared to assisted vaginal birth (pain domain) and planned caesarean section (desire and pain domains). In both the medium- and longer-term, assisted vaginal birth was consistently associated with worse sexual function, compared to other modes of birth.
In regard to the secondary focus of this review (multiple modes of birth combined into one groups), no consistent pattern was shown by adjusted associations to reflect that one mode of birth group was associated with better/worse sexual function compared to another, in the medium- or longer-term.
The results from both the main and secondary focus of this review suggest that sexual dysfunction does not necessarily resolve in the first year postpartum, and that assisted vaginal birth can have lasting effects on sexual function past 12 months postpartum.
Many studies included in this review show that mode of birth is not associated with postpartum sexual functioning in the medium- and longer-term. This supports the findings of Nikolaidou in their systematic review, on the effect of mode of birth on sexual function in the short- and medium-term (up until 12 months postpartum) [36].
The associations shown in this review between assisted vaginal birth, as well as vaginal birth with episiotomy, and worse sexual function can be linked to mechanisms of injury surrounding these operative interventions: assisted vaginal birth is associated with a higher incidence of episiotomy and severe perineal trauma, as well as pelvic floor trauma and nerve damage which can affect sexual function [91,92,93,94,95]. Worse sexual function after planned caesarean section compared to spontaneous vaginal birth could be contributed to by the increased probability of wound problems/scar pain due to the abdominal incision that is involved in caesarean sections as wound problems (both relating to caesarean abdominal wounds and perineal trauma in spontaneous vaginal births) are associated with impaired general sexual health [96]. The protective effect on sexual function that was seen with planned caesarean section could be because women who undergo caesarean section have less pelvic floor trauma compared to those who have had a vaginal birth [95,97,98,99]. However, it must be noted that caesarean section is a major operation that can have serious implications for maternal health and should not be considered solely to preserve sexual function [100].
The included studies varied by study design, sample size, adjustment for confounders, and study quality, however the associations seem not to be affected by these differences.
The longitudinal improvement in sexual function could be due to the natural course of recovery after birth [101]. On the other hand, the worsening of sexual function over time could indicate that, if left untreated, postpartum sexual pain could get worse for those who had an assisted vaginal birth. However, worsening of postpartum sexual function over time could also be related to other postpartum risk factors such as breastfeeding, fatigue or stress [102].
4.1. Strengths and Limitations
The main strength of this integrative review is that only studies using validated measures to assess sexual functioning were included, allowing direct comparison between the studies, as well as increasing the ability to draw clinical implications from the results. Multiple mode of birth and intervention combinations were investigated. Additionally, we focused on the effects beyond six months postpartum, and did not limit the period of interest to a certain time after birth, meaning studies were included that examined associations up to and greater than 10 years postpartum. The majority of studies included in this review were of good quality.
Despite the strengths of this review, some limitations should be noted. When calculating associations between mode of birth and sexual function, some of the included studies did not adjust for important confounding factors in the analysis. Sexual function can be influenced by many factors, including postpartum stress and fatigue, managing relationships with partner (if applicable), life stressors (such as relationship with family, friends and work), breastfeeding, experiences during previous births, history of sexual abuse and degree of sexual dysfunction before pregnancy and birth [3,20,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Without accounting for these factors, any associations, or lack of, may be misrepresented.
Despite the evidence showing the difference between male and female sexual function, some measures of sexual function are based on dated evidence which suggests that women’s sexual function is equivalent to men’s sexual function [103], even though this evidence has been found to ignore “major components of women’s sexual satisfaction” [104], and is a more appropriate reflection of male sexuality [8]. In addition, the measures used by the studies included in this review have not yet been validated in postpartum women.
An additional limitation that should be noted is the lack of consensus on reporting standards in the papers: reporting for mode of births, as well as adjustment for confounding, was not consistent across the papers included in this review.
Two studies examined sexual function at and beyond six years postpartum and found significant adjusted associations with mode of birth [66,73]. Although it is important to examine longer-term postpartum sexual functioning, it should be noted that such a long time gap between birth and measurement of postpartum sexual function means that other factors, besides mode of birth and those adjusted for, may affect sexual function (e.g., menopause, mental health, physical health relationship satisfaction, relationship with child) [3,20,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].
Many of the included studies did not adjust for important confounders, with only nine of 31 studies adjusting for at least one of the most important confounders. Therefore, this needs to be considered as a limitation and taken into account when interpreting any associations reported in this review.
4.2. Recommendations
Future studies should take into account pre-existing sexual dysfunction, quality of the relationship between the parents before and after birth, experienced birth trauma and the model of care experienced, in order to elucidate whether these factors can explain the associations found between mode of birth and sexual function.
Another avenue of research that should be explored is how the health care a woman receives, if any, during the postpartum period affects sexual function. Given how important sexual functioning can be for a woman [1,2,3,4], future research should aim to identify types of care that can help avoid a decline in postpartum sexual function.
Additionally, studying women who have more complex births and are underrepresented in the current literature should be made a priority: for example, many studies excluded women who did not have a singleton birth despite the fact that the proportion of twin births out of total births (per 1000 births) is 14.4 in Europe [105]. In a similar vein, some studies excluded births of babies that were not in cephalic presentation, despite the fact that approximately three to five per cent of women give birth to a child in a breech presentation [106,107].
There is some evidence that incidence of perineal trauma after birth varies between different ethnic groups; a systematic review showed that the majority of studies conducted in Western countries describe women of Asian ethnicity as having increased risk of severe perineal trauma during birth, whereas Asian women living in Asia were not at increased risk. The reasons for this were unknown but could be attributed to differing care that women from different ethnic groups receive, differing birthing techniques, ethnic anatomical differences or cultural differences, and changes in diet when moving to Western countries [108,109]. Therefore, the diversity of the study population, within the geographical area that the study is conducted in, should be disclosed and associations between different ethnicities should be explored in order to attempt to explain why some ethnicities can be at higher risk during labour and birth, as well as during the postpartum period.
It would be valuable to contextualise sexual functioning scores by asking women more in depth, follow-up questions about their postpartum sexual function. This would help to understand why associations exist in the quantitative data, and identify how postpartum care, focused on sexual function, could help women. It is of vital importance that measures are validated in postpartum women. Additionally, it is important that sexual function measures and have undergone cross-cultural validation, for both linguistics and culture, when they are used to measure sexual function in women whose cultural backgrounds differ from those that the measures were originally validated in.
5. Conclusions
This integrative review summarises the existing evidence on the impact of different modes of birth on sexual functioning, in the medium- (≥six months and <12 months postpartum) and longer-term (≥12 months postpartum), published between 2005 and 2023. Assisted vaginal birth has been found to be associated with worse sexual function when compared to spontaneous vaginal birth and caesarean section in both the medium- and longer-term. However, it should also be noted that some studies showed that spontaneous vaginal birth and caesarean section were associated with worse sexual function in comparison to other modes of birth. No mode of birth can be recommended to preserve sexual function in the medium- or longer-term. Therefore, it is important that postpartum sexual functioning is discussed with mothers for all modes of births, in order to encourage women to seek help and support from healthcare professionals should their sexual function be impaired after birth.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph20075252/s1, Table S1: domains and options for quality assessment using NOS; Table S2: scoring system for quality assessment using NOS; Table S3: studies that were excluded after reading full text and reasons for exclusion.
Author Contributions
A.-M.F., N.G. and L.L.P. were involved in the conceptualization of the integrative systematic review. A.-M.F., N.G. and L.L.P. developed the search strategy in consultation with all authors. A.-M.F. and N.G. screened the articles and conducted quality appraisal and data extraction, afterwards discrepancies were discussed with L.L.P. A.-M.F. wrote the manuscript under supervision of L.L.P. and all other involved authors (A.D.J., N.G., L.T., H.G.D. and M.A.S.) made substantial contributions in several review processes. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by EUCAN-connect, A federated FAIR platform enabling large-scale analysis of high-value cohort data connecting Europe and Canada in personalised health. This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 824989. L.T. was supported by the European Regional Development Fund—Project “Creativity and Adaptability as Conditions of the Success of Europe in an Interrelated World” (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000734).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
The authors recognise that individuals have various ways of identifying gender. Rather than avoiding gendering birth, by using phrases such as ‘pregnant person/people’, ‘parent’ or ‘person/people giving birth’, the terms woman, mother and maternity have been used. This is because women are also a marginalised people in most places throughout the world. However, use of these words are not meant to exclude those who give birth and do not identify as a woman. This inclusivity statement is based off work by Kluwgant et al. (2022), and Gribble et al. (2022), on the importance of sexed language and gender identity.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
We thank Martine J.M. Boon for her work in starting the systematic review process.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A. Search Strategy
PubMed:
(“Postpartum Period”[Mesh] OR postpartum[tiab] OR post-partum[tiab] OR puerperium[tiab] OR “after childbirth” OR after birth[tiab] OR after delivery[tiab] OR after labor[tiab] OR after labour[tiab] OR postnatal*[tiab])
AND
(“Delivery, Obstetric”[Mesh] OR “Parturition”[Mesh] OR ((mode[tiab] OR modes[tiab] OR route*[tiab] OR type*[tiab]) AND (labor[tiab] OR labour[tiab] OR delivery[tiab] OR birth[tiab] OR childbirth[tiab])) OR method of birth[tiab] OR method of delivery[tiab] OR instrumental delivery[tiab] OR episiotom*[tiab] OR caesarean[tiab])
AND
(“Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological”[Mesh] OR “Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological”[Mesh] OR “Sexual Health”[Mesh] OR “Sexuality”[Mesh] OR “Sexual Behavior”[Mesh] OR “Orgasm”[Mesh] OR “Libido”[Mesh] OR sexual*[tiab] OR intercourse[tiab] OR sex life[tiab] OR (resum*[tiab] AND sex[tiab]) OR sex[ti])
AND
(“Cohort Studies”[Mesh] OR “Case-Control Studies”[Mesh] OR “Cross-Sectional Studies”[Mesh] OR “Surveys and Questionnaires”[Mesh] OR prospectiv*[tiab] OR follow-up[tiab] OR longitudinal*[tiab] OR risk[tiab] OR associat*[tiab] OR relat*[ti] OR influenc*[tiab] OR predict*[tiab] OR questionnair*[tiab] OR cohort[tiab] OR case–control[tiab] OR crosssectional*[tiab] OR cross-sectional*[tiab])
Embase:
(‘puerperium’/exp OR ((postpartum OR ‘post-partum’ OR puerperium OR ‘after childbirth’ OR ‘after birth’ OR ‘after delivery’ OR ‘after labor’ OR ‘after labour’ OR ‘postnatal*’):ti,ab,kw))
AND
(‘obstetric delivery’/exp OR ‘birth’/exp OR ((((mode OR modes OR route* OR type*) AND (labor OR labour OR delivery OR birth OR childbirth)) OR ‘method of birth’ OR ‘method of delivery’ OR ‘instrumental delivery’ OR episiotom* OR caesarean):ti,ab,kw))
AND
(‘sexual dysfunction’/exp OR ‘psychosexual disorder’/exp OR ‘sexual health’/exp OR ‘sexuality’/exp OR ‘sexual behaviour’/exp OR ‘orgasm’/exp OR ‘libido’/exp OR ((sexual* OR intercourse OR ‘sex life’ OR (resum* AND sex) OR sex):ti,ab,kw))
AND
(‘cohort analysis’/exp OR ‘case–control study’/exp OR ‘cross-sectional study’/exp OR ‘questionnaire’/exp OR ((prospectiv* OR ‘follow-up’ OR longitudinal* OR risk OR associat* OR relat* OR influenc* OR predict* OR questionnair* OR cohort OR ‘case–control’ OR crosssectional* OR ‘cross-sectional*’):ti,ab,kw))
CINAHL:
(MH “Postnatal Period+” OR TI “postpartum” OR AB “postpartum” OR TI “post-partum” OR AB “post-partum” OR TI “puerperium” OR AB “puerperium” OR TI “after childbirth” OR AB “after childbirth” OR TI “after birth” OR AB “after birth” OR TI “after delivery” OR AB “after delivery” OR TI “after labor” OR AB “after labor” OR TI “after labour” OR AB “after labour” OR TI “postnatal*” OR AB “postnatal*”)
AND
(MH “Delivery, Obstetric+” OR MH “Labor+” OR ((TI “mode” OR AB “mode” OR TI “modes” OR AB “modes” OR TI “route*” OR AB “route*” OR TI “type*” OR AB “types*”) AND (TI “labor” OR AB “labor” OR TI “labour” OR AB “labour” OR TI “delivery” OR AB “delivery” OR TI “birth” OR AB “birth” OR TI “childbirth” OR AB “childbirth”)) OR TI “method of birth” OR AB “method of birth” OR TI “method of delivery” OR AB “method of delivery” OR TI “instrumental delivery” OR AB “instrumental delivery” OR TI “episiotom*” OR AB “episiotom*” OR TI “ceasarean” OR AB “ceasarean”)
AND
(MH “Sexual Dysfunction, Female+” OR MH “Psychosexual Disorders+” OR MH “Sexual Health+” OR MH “Sexuality+” OR MH “Sexual Behavior Analysis (Saba CCC)+” OR MH “Orgasm+” OR TI “sexual*” OR AB “sexual*” OR TI “intercourse” OR AB “intercourse” OR TI “sex life” OR AB “sex life” OR ((TI “resum* OR AB “resum*”) AND (TI “sex” OR AB “sex”)) OR TI “sex”)
AND
(MH “Prospective Studies+” OR MH “Case Control Studies+” OR MH “Cross Sectional Studies+” OR MH “Surveys+” OR TI “prospectiv*” OR AB “prospectiv*” OR TI “follow-up” OR AB “follow-up” OR TI “longitudinal*” OR AB “longitudinal*” OR TI “risk” OR AB “risk” OR TI “associat*” OR AB “associat*” OR TI “relat*” OR TI “influenc*” OR AB “influenc*” OR TI “predict*” OR AB “predict*” OR TI “questionnair*” OR AB “questionnair*” OR TI “cohort” OR AB “cohort” OR TI “case–control” OR AB “case–control” OR TI “crosssectional*” OR AB “crosssectional*” OR TI “cross-sectional*” OR AB “cross-sectional*”)
References
- Andreucci, C.B.; Bussadori, J.C.; Pacagnella, R.C.; Chou, D.; Filippi, V.; Say, L.; Cecatti, J.G.; Brazilian COMMAG Study Group; WHO Maternal Morbidity Working Group. Sexual life and dysfunction after maternal morbidity: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015, 15, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamali, S.; Inaloo, R.; Javadpour, S.; Haghbeen, M.; Poornowrooz, N. The Relationship between Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Reproductive-agegrouped Women in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ambient. Sci. 2018, 5, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutzeit, O.; Levy, G.; Lowenstein, L. Postpartum Female Sexual Function: Risk Factors for Postpartum Sexual Dysfunction. Sex. Med. 2020, 8, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagaert, L.; Weyers, S.; Van Kerrebroeck, H.; Elaut, E. Postpartum dyspareunia and sexual functioning: A prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2017, 22, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American Psychiatric Association, D.; American Psychiatric, A. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Sungur, M.Z.; Gündüz, A. A Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Definitions for Sexual Dysfunctions: Critiques and Challenges. J. Sex. Med. 2014, 11, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chivers, M.L.; Bailey, J.M. A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biol. Psychol. 2005, 70, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domoney, C. Sexual function in women: What is normal? Int. Urogynecology J. 2009, 20, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macfarlane, A.J.; Blondel, B.; Mohangoo, A.D.; Cuttini, M.; Nijhuis, J.; Novak, Z.; Ólafsdóttir, H.S.; Zeitlin, J.; the Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: Risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016, 123, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- démographiques, I. Population, Births, Deaths: Population, Births and Deaths in Europe and Other Developed OECD Countries. 2021. Available online: https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/data/europe-developed-countries/population-births-deaths/ (accessed on 19 January 2022).
- Blondel, B.; Alexander, S.; Bjarnadóttir, R.; Gissler, M.; Langhoff-Roos, J.; Novak-Antolič, Ž.; Prunet, C.; Zhang, W.H.; Hindori-Mohangoo, A.D.; Zeitlin, J. Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: A study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project. Acta Obs. Gynecol. Scand. 2016, 95, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Digital, N. NHS Maternity Statistics 2020–2021. 2021. Available online: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternity-statistics/2020-21 (accessed on 6 October 2022).
- OECD. Caesarean Sections (Indicator). 2022. Available online: https://data.oecd.org/healthcare/caesarean-sections.htm (accessed on 6 October 2022).
- World Health Organisation. Caesarean Section Rates Continue to Rise, Amid Growing Inequalities in Access. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access (accessed on 16 June 2021).
- Rudey, E.L.; Leal, M.d.C.; Rego, G. Cesarean section rates in Brazil: Trend analysis using the Robson classification system. Medicine 2020, 99, e19880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Departamento de Análise Epidemiológica e Vigilância de Doenças Não Transmissíveis. Painel de Monitoramento de Nascidos Vivos-Natalidade-Painéis de Monitoramento-Centrais de Conteúdos-DANTPS-SVS/MS. 2019. Available online: http://svs.aids.gov.br/dantps/centrais-de-conteudos/paineis-de-monitoramento/natalidade/nascidos-vivos/ (accessed on 3 March 2022).
- Potter, J.E.; Berquó, E.; Perpétuo, I.H.O.; Leal, O.F.; Hopkins, K.; Souza, M.R.; de Carvalho Formiga, M.C. Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: Prospective study. BMJ 2001, 323, 1155–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McDonald, E.; Brown, S. Does method of birth make a difference to when women resume sex after childbirth? BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013, 120, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonald, E.; Gartland, D.; Woolhouse, H.; Brown, S. Resumption of sex after a second birth: An Australian prospective cohort. Birth 2019, 46, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glazener, C.M.A. Sexual function after childbirth: Women’s experiences, persistent morbidity and lack of professional recognition. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1997, 104, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faisal-Cury, A.; Menezes, P.R.; Quayle, J.; Matijasevich, A.; Diniz, S.G. The Relationship Between Mode of Delivery and Sexual Health Outcomes after Childbirth. J. Sex. Med. 2015, 12, 1212–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, G.; Pendry, E.; Peacock, J.; Victor, C.; Thakar, R.; Manyonda, I. Women’s Sexuality After Childbirth: A Pilot Study. Arch. Sex. Behav. 1999, 28, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hjorth, S.; Kirkegaard, H.; Olsen, J.; Thornton, J.G.; Nohr, E.A. Mode of birth and long-term sexual health: A follow-up study of mothers in the Danish National Birth Cohort. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e029517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scavello, I.; Maseroli, E.; Di Stasi, V.; Vignozzi, L. Sexual Health in Menopause. Medicina 2019, 55, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fabre, L.F.; Smith, L.C. The Effect of Major Depression on Sexual Function in Women. J. Sex. Med. 2012, 9, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiannine, L. An investigation of the relationship between physical fitness, self-concept, and sexual functioning. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2018, 7, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maseroli, E.; Rastrelli, G.; Di Stasi, V.; Cipriani, S.; Scavello, I.; Todisco, T.; Gironi, V.; Castellini, G.; Ricca, V.; Sorbi, F.; et al. Physical Activity and Female Sexual Dysfunction: A Lot Helps, But Not Too Much. J. Sex. Med. 2021, 18, 1217–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gottfried, R.; Lev-Wiesel, R.; Hallak, M.; Lang-Franco, N. Inter-relationships between sexual abuse, female sexual function and childbirth. Midwifery 2015, 31, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banaei, M.; Azizi, M.; Moridi, A.; Dashti, S.; Yabandeh, A.P.; Roozbeh, N. Sexual dysfunction and related factors in pregnancy and postpartum: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst. Rev. 2019, 8, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eid, M.A.; Sayed, A.; Abdel-Rehim, R.; Mostafa, T. Impact of the mode of delivery on female sexual function after childbirth. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2015, 27, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Witting, K.; Santtila, P.; Varjonen, M.; Jern, P.; Johansson, A.; Von Der Pahlen, B.; Sandnabba, K. Original Research—Couples’ Sexual Dysfunctions: Female Sexual Dysfunction, Sexual Distress, and Compatibility with Partner. J. Sex. Med. 2008, 5, 2587–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yıldız, H. The Relation Between Prepregnancy Sexuality and Sexual Function During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: A Prospective Study. J. Sex Marital. Ther. 2015, 41, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bodenmann, G.; Atkins, D.C.; Schär, M.; Poffet, V. The association between daily stress and sexual activity. J. Fam. Psychol. 2010, 24, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayasneh, A.; Pandeva, I. Postpartum Sexual Dysfunction: A literature review of risk factors and role of mode of delivery. BJMP 2010, 3, 316–320. [Google Scholar]
- Hicks, T.L.; Goodall, S.F.; Quattrone, E.M.; Lydon-Rochelle, M.T. Postpartum sexual functioning and method of delivery: Summary of the evidence. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2004, 49, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolaidou, E.; Antoniou, E.; Sarella, A.; Iliadou, M.; Orovou, E.; Dagla, M. The Effect of Type of Delivery on Female Postpartum Sexual Functioning: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiegel, M.; Meston, C.; Rosen, R. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Cross-Validation and Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores. J. Sex Marital. Ther. 2005, 31, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goldfarb, S.; Baron, S.R.; Tessler Lindau, S. Chapter 23-Female Sexuality and Sexual Function. In Women and Health, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ter Kuile, M.M.; Brauer, M.; Laan, E. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): Psychometric Properties within a Dutch Population. J. Sex Marital. Ther. 2006, 32, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rust, J.; Golombok, S. The GRISS: A psychometric instrument for the assessment of sexual dysfunction. Arch. Sex. Behav. 1986, 15, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shoji, M.; Hamatani, T.; Ishikawa, S.; Kuji, N.; Ohta, H.; Matsui, H.; Yoshimura, Y. Sexual Satisfaction of infertile couples assessed using the Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS). Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rust, J.; Golombok, S. GRISS-The Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction: Test Manual. In The Psychometrics Centre; UoC, Ed.; University of Cambridge Psychometrics Centre, Cambridge Judge Business School: Cambridge, UK, 1986; p. 33. Available online: https://www.psychometrics.cam.ac.uk/files/griss_manual.pdf (accessed on 25 March 2022).
- Learman, L.A.; Huang, A.J.; Nakagawa, S.; Gregorich, S.E.; Kuppermann, M. Development and validation of a sexual functioning measure for use in diverse women’s health outcome studies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 198, 710.e1–710.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selcuk, S.; Kucukbas, M.; Cam, C.; Eser, A.; Devranoglu, B.; Turkyilmaz, S.; Karateke, A. Validation of the Turkish Version of the Sexual Health Outcomes in Women Questionnaire (SHOW-Q) in Turkish-Speaking Women. Sex. Med. 2016, 4, e89–e94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thirlaway, K.; Fallowfield, L.; Cuzick, J. The Sexual Activity Questionnaire: A Measure of Women’s Sexual Functioning. Qual. Life Res. 1996, 5, 81–90. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4034783 (accessed on 5 April 2022). [CrossRef]
- Oppenheimer, A.; Panel, P.; Rouquette, A.; du Cheyron, J.; Deffieux, X.; Fauconnier, A. Validation of the Sexual Activity Questionnaire in women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vistad, I.; Fosså, S.D.; Kristensen, G.B.; Mykletun, A.; Dahl, A.A. The Sexual Activity Questionnaire: Pychometric Properties And Normative Data in A Norwegian Population Sample. J. Women’s Health 2007, 16, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boncinelli, V.; Civilotti, C.; Bernorio, R.; Caruso, S.; Di Fini, G.; Giommi, R.; Lenzi, E.; Mori, G.; Rossetto, C.; Rossi, R.; et al. The Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ): A psychometric evaluation. Sex. Relatsh. Ther. 2022, 37, 489–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quirk, F.H.; Heiman, J.R.; Rosen, R.C.; Laan, E.; Smith, M.D.; Boolell, M. Development of a Sexual Function Questionnaire for Clinical Trials of Female Sexual Dysfunction. J. Women’s Health Gend.-Based Med. 2002, 11, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quirk, F.; Haughie, S.; Symonds, T. The Use of the Sexual Function Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Women with Sexual Dysfunction. J. Sex. Med. 2005, 2, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Symonds, T.; Abraham, L.; Bushmakin, A.G.; Williams, K.; Martin, M.; Cappelleri, J.C. Sexual Function Questionnaire: Further Refinement and Validation. J. Sex. Med. 2012, 9, 2609–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ‘t Hoen, L.A.; Utomo, E.; Steensma, A.B.; Blok, B.F.M.; Korfage, I.J. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12): Validation of the Dutch version. Int. Urogynecology J. 2015, 26, 1293–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, R.G.; Coates, K.W.; Kammerer-Doak, D.; Khalsa, S.; Qualls, C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int. Urogynecology J. 2003, 14, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Lau, H.-H.; Hung, M.-J.; Huang, W.-C.; Zheng, Y.-W.; Su, T.-H. Validation of a Mandarin Chinese version of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire IUGA–revised (PISQ-IR). Int. Urogynecology J. 2015, 26, 1695–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wells, G.A.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; Available online: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed on 19 April 2022).
- Sharmin, S.; Kypri, K.; Khanam, M.; Wadolowski, M.; Bruno, R.; Attia, J.; Holliday, E.; Palazzi, K.; Mattick, R.P. Effects of parental alcohol rules on risky drinking and related problems in adolescence: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017, 178, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharmin, S.; Kypri, K.; Khanam, M.; Wadolowski, M.; Bruno, R.; Mattick, R.P. Parental Supply of Alcohol in Childhood and Risky Drinking in Adolescence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Toxicology Program. Handbook for Conducting a Literature-Based Health Assessment Using Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Approach for Systematic Review and Evidence Integration. Available online: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/ohat/pubs/handbookmarch2019_508.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2022).
- Baytur, Y.B.; Deveci, A.; Uyar, Y.; Ozcakir, H.T.; Kizilkaya, S.; Caglar, H. Mode of delivery and pelvic floor muscle strength and sexual function after childbirth. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2005, 88, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doğan, B.; Gün, İ.; Özdamar, Ö.; Yılmaz, A.; Muhçu, M. Long-term impacts of vaginal birth with mediolateral episiotomy on sexual and pelvic dysfunction and perineal pain. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017, 30, 457–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gungor, S.; Baser, I.; Ceyhan, S.; Karasahin, E.; Acikel, C.H. Mode of delivery and subsequent long-term sexual function of primiparous women. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2007, 19, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kahramanoglu, I.; Baktiroglu, M.; Hamzaoglu, K.; Kahramanoglu, O.; Verit, F.F.; Yucel, O. The impact of mode of delivery on the sexual function of primiparous women: A prospective study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2017, 295, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saydam, B.K.; Demireloz Akyuz, M.; Sogukpinar, N.; Ceber Turfan, E. Effect of delivery method on sexual dysfunction. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 32, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baksu, B.; Davas, I.; Agar, E.; Akyol, A.; Varolan, A. The effect of mode of delivery on postpartum sexual functioning in primiparous women. Int. Urogynecology J. 2007, 18, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crane, A.K.; Geller, E.J.; Bane, H.; Ju, R.; Myers, E.; Matthews, C.A. Evaluation of pelvic floor symptoms and sexual function in primiparous women who underwent operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery for second-stage arrest. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2013, 19, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fehniger, J.E.; Brown, J.S.; Creasman, J.M.; Van Den Eeden, S.K.; Thom, D.H.; Subak, L.L.; Huang, A.J. Childbirth and female sexual function later in life. Obs. Gynecol. 2013, 122, 988–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, R.; Leeman, L.; Borders, N.; Qualls, C.; Fullilove, A.; Teaf, D.; Hall, R.J.; Albers, L.L. Abstracts of the oral presentations from the 37th Annual IUGA (International Urogynecological Association) Meeting. Brisbane, Australia, 4–8 September 2012. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2012, 23 (Suppl. S2), S43–S244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yee, L.M.; Kaimal, A.J.; Nakagawa, S.; Houston, K.; Kuppermann, M. Predictors of postpartum sexual activity and function in a diverse population of women. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2013, 58, 654–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabiri, F.; Yabandeh, A.P.; Shahi, A.; Kamjoo, A.; Teshnizi, S.H. The effect of mode of delivery on postpartum sexual functioning in primiparous women. Oman Med. J. 2014, 29, 276–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghorat, F.; Esfehani, R.J.; Sharifzadeh, M.; Tabarraei, Y.; Aghahosseini, S.S. Long term effect of vaginal delivery and cesarean section on female sexual function in primipara mothers. Electron. Physician 2017, 9, 3991–3996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghadam, M.; Zaheri, F.; Shams Alizadeh, N.; Shahsavari, S. The Relationship Between the Type of Delivery and Sexual Function in Mothers Referring to Kourdistan (Sanandaj) Health Centers in 2015–2016. Crescent J. Med. Biol. Sci. 2019, 6, 473–480. Available online: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=776956 (accessed on 23 March 2022).
- Hosseini, L.; Iran-Pour, E.; Safarinejad, M.R. Sexual function of primiparous women after elective cesarean section and normal vaginal delivery. Urol. J. 2012, 9, 498–504. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22641494 (accessed on 25 March 2022). [PubMed]
- Dean, N.; Wilson, D.; Herbison, P.; Glazener, C.; Aung, T.; Macarthur, C. Sexual function, delivery mode history, pelvic floor muscle exercises and incontinence: A cross-sectional study six years post-partum. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2008, 48, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Souza, A.; Dwyer, P.L.; Charity, M.; Thomas, E.; Ferreira, C.H.J.; Schierlitz, L. The effects of mode delivery on postpartum sexual function: A prospective study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015, 122, 1410–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klein, K.; Worda, C.; Leipold, H.; Gruber, C.; Husslein, P.; Wenzl, R. Does the Mode of Delivery Influence Sexual Function after Childbirth? J. Women’s Health 2009, 18, 1227–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, Y.; Hassan, H.; Dinary, A.; Rashed, N. Sexual Function after Childbirth according to the Mode of Delivery. Androl. Gynecol. Curr. Res. 2016, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zgliczynska, M.; Zasztowt-Sternicka, M.; Kosinska-Kaczynska, K.; Szymusik, I.; Pazdzior, D.; Durmaj, A.; Szlachta, M.; Bartnik, P.; Wielgos, M. Impact of childbirth on women’s sexuality in the first year after the delivery. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2021, 47, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spaich, S.; Link, G.; Alvarez, S.O.; Weiss, C.; Sütterlin, M.; Tuschy, B.; Berlit, S. Influence of Peripartum Expectations, Mode of Delivery, and Perineal Injury on Women’s Postpartum Sexuality. J. Sex. Med. 2020, 17, 1312–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, M.; Ishii, H.; Toda, M.; Tomimatsu, T.; Katsuyama, H.; Nakamura, T.; Nakai, Y.; Shimoya, K. Association between sexual health and delivery mode. Sex. Med. 2014, 2, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbara, G.; Pifarotti, P.; Facchin, F.; Cortinovis, I.; Dridi, D.; Ronchetti, C.; Calzolari, L.; Vercellini, P. Impact of Mode of Delivery on Female Postpartum Sexual Functioning: Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery and Operative Vaginal Delivery vs Cesarean Section. J. Sex. Med. 2016, 13, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Dedda, M.; Cantaluppi, S.; Sorice, P.; Zehhaf, C.; Braga, A.; Cattoni, E.; Serati, M. Sexual disfunctions after childbirth and mode of delivery: Is there a correlation? Neurourol. Urodyn. 2017, 36, S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baud, D.; Sichitiu, J.; Lombardi, V.; De Rham, M.; Meyer, S.; Vial, Y.; Achtari, C. Comparison of pelvic floor dysfunction 6 years after uncomplicated vaginal versus elective cesarean deliveries: A cross-sectional study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szollosi, K.; Komka, K.; Szabo, L. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction during the first year postpartum: A prospective study. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2021, 157, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, L.; Zhang, B.; Lin, H.; Xing, W.; Chen, J. Does vaginal delivery affect postnatal coitus? Int. J. Impot. Res. 2014, 26, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, S.-R.; Chen, K.-H.; Ho, H.-N.; Lai, Y.-H.; Lin, M.-I.; Lee, C.-N.; Lin, W.-A. Depressive symptoms, pain, and sexual dysfunction over the first year following vaginal or cesarean delivery: A prospective longitudinal study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2015, 52, 1433–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dahlgren, H.; Jansson, M.H.; Franzén, K.; Hiyoshi, A.; Nilsson, K. Sexual function in primiparous women: A prospective study. Int. Urogynecology J. 2022, 33, 1567–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lurie, S.; Aizenberg, M.; Sulema, V.; Boaz, M.; Kovo, M.; Golan, A.; Sadan, O. Sexual function after childbirth by the mode of delivery: A prospective study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2013, 288, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Sousa, N.Q.; Borges, A.C.; Sarabando, R.; Bivar, L.; Viana, J.; Cerqueira, M.; Miranda, A.; Reis, I.; Nogueira-Silva, C. The Role of Operative Vaginal Delivery in Postpartum Sexual Dysfunction: MOODS-A Prospective Study. J. Sex. Med. 2021, 18, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De souza, A.M.; Dwyer, P.L.; Thomas, E.; Charity, M.; Schierlitz, L. A prospective study of sexual well being at 12 months postpartum. Does mode of delivery matter? Int. Urogynecology J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013, 24, S84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, S.R.; Chen, K.H.; Lin, M.I.; Lin, W.A. Sexual Dysfunction through 1 Year Postpartum Following Vaginal or Caesarean Delivery. J. Sex. Med. 2015, 12, 351–352. Available online: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L619674160&from=export (accessed on 2 November 2022).
- Gossett, D.R.; Gilchrist-Scott, D.; Wayne, D.B.; Gerber, S.E. Simulation Training for Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Delivery and Rates of Maternal Perineal Trauma. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 128, 429–435. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2016/09000/Simulation_Training_for_Forceps_Assisted_Vaginal.3.aspx (accessed on 9 June 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hudelist, G.; Gelle’n, J.; Singer, C.; Ruecklinger, E.; Czerwenka, K.; Kandolf, O.; Keckstein, J. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: Role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 192, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, C.; Rodríguez, T.; Herranz, A.; Espinosa, J.A.; Sánchez, E.; Espuña-Pons, M. Alternative model of birth to reduce the risk of assisted vaginal delivery and perineal trauma. Int. Urogynecology J. 2012, 23, 1249–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, L.A.; Price, N.; Simonite, V.; Burns, E.E. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: A prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quoc Huy, N.V.; Phuc An, L.S.; Phuong, L.S.; Tam, L.M. Pelvic Floor and Sexual Dysfunction After Vaginal Birth With Episiotomy in Vietnamese Women. Sex. Med. 2019, 7, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lal, M.; Pattison, H.M.; Allan, T.F.; Callender, R. Does post-caesarean dyspareunia reflect sexual malfunction, pelvic floor and perineal dysfunction? J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011, 31, 617–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, E.C.S.; Nogueira, A.A.; Candido dos Reis, F.J.; Rosa e Silva, J.C. Cesarean section as a cause of chronic pelvic pain. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2002, 79, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fynes, M.; Donnelly, V.S.; O’Connell, P.R.; O’Herlihy, C. Cesarean delivery and anal sphincter injury. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998, 92 Pt 1, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pakenham, S.; Chamberlain, S.M.; Smith, G.N. Women’s Views on Elective Primary Caesarean Section. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2006, 28, 1089–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandall, J.; Tribe, R.M.; Avery, L.; Mola, G.; Visser, G.H.; Homer, C.S.; Gibbons, D.; Kelly, N.M.; Kennedy, H.P.; Kidanto, H.; et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet 2018, 392, 1349–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Effati-Daryani, F.; Jahanfar, S.; Mohammadi, A.; Zarei, S.; Mirghafourvand, M. The relationship between sexual function and mental health in Iranian pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alligood-Percoco, N.R.; Kjerulff, K.H.; Repke, J.T. Risk Factors for Dyspareunia After First Childbirth. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 128, 512. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2016/09000/Risk_Factors_for_Dyspareunia_After_First.13.aspx (accessed on 15 November 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Masters, W.H.; Johnson, V.E. Human Sexual Response; Little Brown: Boston, MA, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Basson, R. The Female Sexual Response: A Different Model. J. Sex Marital. Ther. 2000, 26, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monden, C.; Pison, G.; Smits, J. Twin Peaks: More twinning in humans than ever before. Hum. Reprod. 2021, 36, 1666–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sentilhes, L.; Schmitz, T.; Azria, E.; Gallot, D.; Ducarme, G.; Korb, D.; Mattuizzi, A.; Parant, O.; Sananès, N.; Baumann, S.; et al. Présentation du siège. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF–Texte court. Gynécologie Obs. Fertil. Sénologie 2020, 48, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tunde-Byass, M.O.; Hannah, M.E. Breech vaginal delivery at or near term. Semin. Perinatol. 2003, 27, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wheeler, J.; Davis, D.; Fry, M.; Brodie, P.; Homer, C.S.E. Is Asian ethnicity an independent risk factor for severe perineal trauma in childbirth? A systematic review of the literature. Women Birth 2012, 25, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henderson, J.; Gao, H.; Redshaw, M. Experiencing maternity care: The care received and perceptions of women from different ethnic groups. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
