Psychological Well-Being and Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at School
1.2. Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning and Psychological Well Being
1.3. Aims
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants and Study Design
2.2. Measurements
2.3. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Marsh, H.; Huppert, F.; Donald, J.; Sahdra, B. The Well-Being Profile (WB-Pro): Creating a Theoretically Based Multidimensional Measure of Well-Being to Advance Theory, Research, Policy, and Practice. Psychol. Assess. 2019, 32, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. How’s Life? Measuring Well-Being; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 141–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diener, E.; Lucas, R.E. Personality and Subjective Well-Being. In Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology; Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N., Eds.; Russell Sage Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 213–229. [Google Scholar]
- Diener, E.; Oishi, S.; Tay, L. Advances in subjective well-being research. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2018, 2, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Disabato, D.J.; Goodman, F.R.; Kashdan, T.B.; Short, J.L.; Jarden, A. Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychol. Assess. 2016, 28, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 2000, 11, 227–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L.; Vansteenkiste, M.; Soenens, B. A legacy unfinished: An appreciative reply to comments on self-determination theory’s frontiers and challenges. Motiv. Sci. 2021, 7, 120–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryff, C.D.; Keyes, C.L.M. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1995, 69, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aliverninia, F.; Cavicchiolo, E.; Girelli, L.; Lucidi, F.; Biasi, V.; Leone, L.; Cozzolino, M.; Manganellia, S. Relationships between sociocultural factors (gender, immigrant T and socioeconomic background), peer relatedness and positive affect in adolescents. J. Adolesc. 2019, 76, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can. J. Psychol. 2008, 49, 182–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-Determination Theory. Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development and Wellness; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Mikami, A.Y.; Ruzek, E.A.; Hafen, C.A.; Gregory, A.; Allen, J.P. Perceptions of relatedness with classroom peers promote adolescents’ behavioral engagement and achievement in secondary school. J. Youth Adolesc. 2017, 46, 2341–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olafsen, A.H.; Halvari, H.; Frolund, C.W. The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Need Frustration at Work Scale: A Validation Study. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 216–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Busque-Carrier, M.; Ratelle, C.F.; Le Corff, Y. Work Values and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Basic Psychological Needs at Work. J. Career Dev. 2022, 49, 1386–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Francisco, C.; Sánchez-Romero, E.I.; Del Pilar Vílchez Conesa, M.; Arce, C. Basic Psychological Needs, Burnout and Engagement in Sport: The Mediating Role of Motivation Regulation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Almeida, E.M.; Arantes, L.C. Basic Psychological Needs and Physical Education Classes: The Potentials of the Sport Education Model. Humanidades Inov. 2022, 9, 128–140. [Google Scholar]
- Niemiec, C.P.; Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-determination theory and the relation of autonomy to self-regulatory processes and personality development. In Handbook of Personality and Self-Regulation; Hoyle, R.H., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Malden, MA, USA, 2010; pp. 169–191. [Google Scholar]
- Vansteenkiste, M.; Ryan, R.M.; Soenens, B. Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motiv. Emot. 2020, 44, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.; Levesque-Bristol, C.; Maeda, Y. General need for autonomy and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis of studies in the US and East Asia. J. Happiness Stud. 2018, 19, 1863–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turgeon, S.; Martin, L.; Rathwell, S.; Camiré, M. The influence of gender on the relationship between the basic psychological needs and mental health in high school student-athletes. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2024, 22, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, L.; Tian, Q.; Huebner, E.S. School-Related Social Support and Adolescents’ School- Related Subjective Well-Being: The Mediating Role. Soc. Indic. Res. 2016, 128, 105–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, L.; Han, M.; Huebner, E.S. Preliminary development of the adolescent students ’ basic psychological needs at school scale. J. Adolesc. 2014, 37, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inman, R.A.; Costa, P.J.C.; Moreira, P.A.S. Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese Adolescent Students’ Basic Psychological Needs at School Scale (ASBPNSS) and Evidence of Differential Associations with Indicators of Subjective Wellbeing. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 2023, 41, 100–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozen, S.; Demir, I. Turkish adaptation of the adolescent students’ basic psychological needs at school scale. J. Curr. Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 8, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheykholeslami, A.; Khakdal Gojebagloo, S. The study of psychometric properties of the students’ basic psychological needs at school scale. J. Sch. Psychol. 2018, 7, 168–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control; Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Bandura, A. Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2018, 13, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bandura, A. Applying Theory for Human Betterment. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2019, 14, 12–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bandura, A.; Barbaranelli, C.; Caprara, G.V.; Pastorelli, C. Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children’s Aspirations and Career Trajectories. Child Dev. 2001, 72, 187–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zimmerman, B.J.; Cleary, T.J. Adolescents’ development of personal agency: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. In Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents; Pajares, F., Urdan, T., Eds.; Information Age: Greenwich, CT, USA, 2006; pp. 45–69. [Google Scholar]
- Bandura, A. Multidimensional Scales of Perceived Self-Efficacy; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Pastorelli, C.; Picconi, L. Autoefficacia scolastica, sociale e regolatoria. In La Valutazione dell’Autoefficacia. Costrutti e Strumenti; Caprara, G.V., Ed.; Erickson: Trento, Italy, 2001; pp. 87–104. [Google Scholar]
- Bandura, A.; Barbaranelli, C.; Caprara, G.V.; Pastorelli, C. Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Dev. 1996, 67, 1206–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pastorelli, C.; Caprara, G.V.; Barbaranelli, C.; Rola, J.; Rozsa, S.; Bandura, A. The structure of children’s perceived self-efficacy: A cross-national study. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 2001, 17, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putarek, V.; Pavlin-Bernardic, N. The role of self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, achievement goals, and engagement in academic cheating. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2020, 35, 647–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caprara, G.V.; Steca, P.; Gerbino, M.; Paciello, M.; Vecchio, G.M. Looking for adolescents’ well-being: Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and happiness. Epidemiol. Psichiatr. Soc. 2006, 15, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Q.; Wu, J.; Peng, H. Chinese EFL University Students’ Self-Efficacy for Online Self-Regulated Learning: Dynamic Features and Influencing Factors. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 912970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raven, H.; Pels, F. Why feeling competent matters: Associations between satisfaction of basic psychological needs of students and self-efficacy in secondary school physical education. Ger. J. Exerc. Sport Res. 2021, 51, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riu, Z.; Ru-De, L.; Yi, D.; Jia, W.; Ying, L.; Le, X. The mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relation between basic psychological needs satisfaction and learning engagement among Chinese adolescent students. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2017, 54, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hambleton, R.K. Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests to languages and cultures. In Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment; Hambleton, R.K., Merenda, P., Spielberger, C., Eds.; Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 3–38. [Google Scholar]
- Hambleton, R.K.; Patsula, L.N. Increasing the Validity of Adapted Tests: Myths to be Avoided and Guidelines for Improving Test Adaptation Practices. JATT 1999, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- McDonald, R.P. Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 2011, 23, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asparouhov, T.; Muthén, B.O.; Morin, A.J.S. Bayesian Structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances. J. Manag. 2015, 41, 1561–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morin, A.J.S.; Arens, A.K.; Marsh, H.W. A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Struct. Equ. Model. 2016, 23, 116–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandenberg, R.J.; Lance, C.E. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 2000, 3, 4–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enders, C.K.; Bandalos, D.L. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct. Equ. Model. 2001, 8, 430–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, G.W.; Rensvold, R.B. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. 2002, 9, 233–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthén, L.K.; Muthén, B.O. Mplus User’s Guide; Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, LA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- International Business Machines Corporation. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSS Statistics 25.0; IBM: Somers, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Bisegger, C.; Cloetta, B.; von Rueden, U.; Abel, T.; Ravens-Sieber, U. Health-related quality of life: Gender differences in childhood and adolescence. Soz. Praventivmed. 2005, 50, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pedditzi, M.L.; Nonnis, M.; Massidda, D. Assertività e soddisfazione degli studenti nelle transizioni scolastiche: Una ricerca nella scuola secondaria superiore. Psicol. Della Salut. 2016, 2, 43–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedditzi, M.L.; Passarelli, M. School Social Context, Students’ Self-Efficacy and Satisfaction in High School. Open Psychol. J. 2018, 11, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leon, J.; Liew, J. Profiles of adolescents’ peer and teacher relatedness: Differences in well-being and academic achievement across latent groups. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2017, 54, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newland, L.A.; Mourlam, D.; Strouse, G.; DeCino, D.; Hanson, C. A phenomenological exploration of children’s school life and well-being. Learn. Environ. Res. 2019, 22, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soresi, S.; Nota, L. Clipper. Portfolio per L’Orientamento dai 15 ai 19 Anni. Una Raccolta di Strumenti per L’Orientamento Nella Scuola Superiore; Giunti: Firenze, Italy, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Pedditzi, M.L. School Satisfaction and Self-Efficacy in Adolescents and Intention to Drop out of School. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, S.W.; Axelrod, J.; Langberg, J.M. Efficacy of a school-based treatment program for middle school youth with ADHD: Pilot data. BMO 2004, 28, 528–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Models | χ2 | df | Scf | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Models based on 15 items | CFA-M15 | 346.070 | 87 | 1.16 | 0.889 | 0.866 | 0.087 |
ESEM -M15 | 183.425 | 63 | 1.03 | 0.949 | 0.914 | 0.070 | |
Models based on 11 items * | CFA-M11 | 102.369 | 41 | 1.19 | 0.966 | 0.954 | 0.062 |
ESEM-M11 | 54.205 | 25 | 1.12 | 0.984 | 0.964 | 0.054 | |
Gender invariance-M11 | Configural | 142.454 | 82 | 1.17 | 0.967 | 0.955 | 0.061 |
Weak | 151.576 | 90 | 1.16 | 0.966 | 0.958 | 0.059 | |
Strong | 173.380 | 98 | 1.15 | 0.958 | 0.953 | 0.062 | |
Uniquenesses | 181.687 | 109 | 1.16 | 0.960 | 0.959 | 0.058 | |
Variances/Covariances | 185.850 | 115 | 1.16 | 0.961 | 0.962 | 0.056 | |
Means | 198.728 | 118 | 1.25 | 0.955 | 0.958 | 0.059 |
CFA-M11 | ESEM-M11 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autonomy | Relatedness | Competence | Uniquenesses | Autonomy | Relatedness | Competence | Uniquenesses | |
Item 1_1 | 0.725 | 0.475 | 0.800 | −0.036 | −0.069 | 0.448 | ||
Item 3_7 | 0.646 | 0.281 | 0.555 | 0.014 | 0.125 | 0.284 | ||
Item 4_10 | 0.930 | 0.468 | 0.904 | 0.007 | 0.025 | 0.360 | ||
Item 6_2 | 0.848 | 0.269 | 0.044 | 0.790 | 0.051 | 0.271 | ||
Item 7_5 | 0.855 | 0.471 | 0.034 | 0.781 | 0.084 | 0.485 | ||
Item 8_8 | 0.865 | 0.583 | −0.040 | 0.796 | 0.131 | 0.579 | ||
Item 9_11 | 0.871 | 0.251 | 0.048 | 0.846 | 0.013 | 0.253 | ||
Item 11_3 | 0.729 | 0.582 | −0.074 | −0.131 | 0.920 | 0.605 | ||
Item 12_6 | 0.727 | 0.135 | −0.095 | 0.120 | 0.694 | 0.148 | ||
Item 13_9 | 0.647 | 0.241 | 0.089 | 0.264 | 0.364 | 0.228 | ||
Item 14_12 | 0.578 | 0.666 | 0.060 | −0.210 | 0.709 | 0.595 | ||
Omega | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.92 |
CFA | ESEM | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autonomy | Relatedness | Competence | Autonomy | Relatedness | Competence | |
Autonomy | 1 | 1 | ||||
Relatedness | 0.532 | 1 | 0.481 | 1 | ||
Competence | 0.635 | 0.704 | 1 | 0.632 | 0.631 | 1 |
Models | χ2 | df | Scf | CFI | TLI | RMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Configural | 599.784 | 362 | 1.08 | 0.929 | 0.918 | 0.058 |
Weak | 617.893 | 379 | 1.08 | 0.929 | 0.921 | 0.056 |
Strong | 671.118 | 396 | 1.07 | 0.918 | 0.913 | 0.059 |
Uniquenesses | 697.609 | 417 | 1.07 | 0.917 | 0.916 | 0.058 |
Variances/covariances | 728.018 | 429 | 1.08 | 0.911 | 0.913 | 0.059 |
Means | 743.085 | 433 | 1.08 | 0.908 | 0.911 | 0.060 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pedditzi, M.L.; Scalas, L.F. Psychological Well-Being and Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081037
Pedditzi ML, Scalas LF. Psychological Well-Being and Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(8):1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081037
Chicago/Turabian StylePedditzi, Maria Luisa, and Laura Francesca Scalas. 2024. "Psychological Well-Being and Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 8: 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081037