1. Introduction
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a prevalent condition characterized by median nerve compression within the carpal tunnel, a narrow passage at the wrist. Symptoms typically include pain, paresthesia, and numbness in the thumb, index, and middle fingers. The condition affects an estimated 3% to 8% of the general population, with a higher incidence among women and individuals aged 40–60 years.
The etiology of CTS is multifactorial. While increased carpal tunnel pressure is a key factor, the precise cause remains elusive. Both anatomic compression and inflammation are implicated. Risk factors include genetic predisposition, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, obesity, hypothyroidism, pregnancy, wrist trauma, aromatase inhibitor use, and environmental exposures [
1,
2].
Diagnosis is established through physical examination and nerve conduction studies. Treatment modalities encompass conservative and surgical approaches. Non-surgical interventions include rest, splinting, patient education, neurodynamic therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, heat therapy, massage, ultrasound, acupuncture, and corticosteroid injections. Carpal tunnel release surgery, either open or endoscopic, aims to alleviate median nerve compression [
3].
While surgery often provides short-term symptom relief and functional improvement, long-term outcomes beyond two years are less well defined. Moreover, the influence of age, gender, and comorbidities on long-term surgical results remains inconsistent across studies [
4]. This investigation aims to comprehensively evaluate the long-term efficacy of carpal tunnel release surgery in a substantial patient cohort, identifying potential predictors of surgical success.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participants
A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the long-term outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery. Patients who underwent CTR at least five years prior to enrollment were included. The exclusion criteria encompassed pregnant women, individuals under 18 years, and those with impaired judgment, communication difficulties, or dementia. Eligible participants were contacted by telephone up to three times. Informed consent was obtained prior to a telephone interview.
2.2. Outcome Measures
Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), a validated instrument measuring symptom severity (SSS) and functional status (FSS) [
5,
6,
7]. The SSS comprises 11 items evaluating pain, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, nocturnal symptoms, and grasping difficulties. The FSS consists of eight items assessing functional limitations in daily activities. Scores for both scales range from 1 (no symptoms/difficulties) to 5 (severe symptoms/unable to perform activity), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and BCTQ scores. Means ± standard deviations, medians, minimums, and maximums were calculated for continuous variables, while frequencies and percentages were reported for categorical variables. Univariate comparisons were conducted using the Chi-square test for categorical data and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data. A generalized linear model incorporating variables with p-values < 0.05 from univariate analysis and informed by clinical expertise was employed for multivariate analysis. To visualize the temporal trend of mean BCTQ scores post-surgery, locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) with 95% confidence intervals was utilized. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.3.1.
3. Results
During the study period, 186 patients consented to participate and completed the interview, representing a 44.9% response rate from 414 eligible patients. The remaining 229 individuals were excluded due to inability to contact (121), refusal to participate (40), communication difficulties (45), or incomplete interviews (22).
This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction following carpal tunnel release surgery and compare outcomes between subgroups. A post hoc sample size calculation was performed to ensure adequate statistical power for these comparisons. Assuming a conservative 50% satisfaction rate and a desired power of 80% at a significance level of 0.05, a sample size of 186 patients was determined to be sufficient for group comparisons.
The average age at surgery was 53.9 years, with 29% males. The median follow-up period was 11 years. Most participants were married (71.2%) and employed (66.5%), with 53% being aged 67 or older and 19% previously unemployed.
Table 1 compares patient characteristics based on symptom status (BCTQ = 1 vs. BCTQ > 1). Patients with symptoms were older at surgery (55.0 ± 10.5 vs. 51.4 ± 11.2 years,
p = 0.009) and less likely to be employed (22% vs. 83%,
p < 0.001) or retired (31% vs. 62%,
p < 0.001). Unemployment before retirement age was higher in the symptomatic group (49% vs. 8.1%,
p < 0.001).
Among the 186 participants, 73.1% (n = 136) reported no symptoms (BCTQ = 1). The remaining patients reported BCTQ scores as follows: 1.01–2.0 (9.1%, n = 17), 2.01–3.0 (8.1%, n = 15), 3.01–4.0 (4.8%, n = 9), and 4.01–5.0 (4.8%, n = 9) (
Table 2).
BCTQ scores were not associated with gender (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.71–3.53,
p = 0.285) or diabetes (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.64–3.32,
p = 0.398) after adjusting for age at surgery (
Table 3). However, unemployment was associated with higher symptom scores.
Figure 1 illustrates the mean BCTQ score over time since surgery, demonstrating a temporal trend.
Figure 2 presents the distribution of symptom status by time since surgery.
4. Discussion
Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a surgical intervention aimed at alleviating carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) symptoms by dividing the transverse carpal ligament, thereby decompressing the median nerve. While generally safe, CTR carries potential risks including bleeding, infection, nerve or tendon injury, scar-related issues, and persistent pain. Factors influencing short-term outcomes encompass symptom severity, surgical expertise, and postoperative care, whereas long-term success hinges on nerve recovery and sustained function.
Our study demonstrates the long-term efficacy of CTR, with high patient satisfaction rates up to 15 years post surgery. Most participants reported significant symptom improvement, reduced pain, and enhanced quality of life, as evidenced by the high proportion (73.1%) achieving a BCTQ score of 1. A negative correlation between time since surgery and BCTQ scores was observed (
Figure 1).
Consistent with our findings, previous research has reported favorable long-term outcomes following CTR. Nancollas et al. found good or excellent outcomes in 87% of patients at an average of 5.5 years post surgery, although some residual symptoms persisted [
8]. Shai et al. reviewed seven controlled studies and concluded that surgical treatment has a superior benefit, in terms of symptoms and function, at six and twelve months [
9]. Tang et al. demonstrated positive outcomes and high satisfaction rates in patients with bilateral severe CTS at a mean follow-up of nine years [
10], while other reviews confirmed significant improvements in clinical and subjective outcomes, independent of patient characteristics [
11,
12]. De Kleermaeker et al. also reported favorable outcomes in 81.6% of patients at a median follow-up of nine years, emphasizing the importance of early treatment success [
13]. Huistestede et al. presented an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of surgical and post-surgical interventions for CTS and stated that for the long term, surgery was more effective than noninvasive treatment [
14], and Alimohammadi et al. identified predictors of better outcomes, including younger age, shorter symptom duration, and higher preoperative function [
15].
Limitations: The retrospective cross-sectional design precludes causal inference and limits the assessment of temporal relationships. The reliance on self-reported outcomes introduces potential bias, and the absence of a control group hinders direct comparison with the natural history of CTS. Additionally, objective nerve function measures were lacking. Furthermore, the present study is limited by the absence of data from patients who did not respond to the survey, restricting our ability to characterize this non-respondent group. To further elucidate the long-term outcomes and identify optimal patient candidates for carpal tunnel release surgery, a prospective cohort study with extended follow-up is warranted.
Despite these limitations, our findings provide compelling evidence for the long-term benefits of CTR in alleviating CTS symptoms and improving patient-reported outcomes.
5. Conclusions
Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is an established surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, providing significant relief from symptoms and improved function in most patients. Our study findings underscore the long-term efficacy of CTR, demonstrating sustained benefits in symptom reduction, functional improvement, and overall quality of life for up to 15 years post surgery.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.K., A.S., A.R.B. and E.S.; data curation, Y.K. and A.R.B.; formal analysis, M.O. and A.R.B.; investigation, G.S., H.M.-N. and P.R.; methodology, Y.K., G.S., H.M.-N., P.R., A.S., A.R.B. and E.S.; project administration, Y.K.; resources, G.S., H.M.-N., P.R. and A.R.B.; software, M.O.; supervision, Y.S., A.S., A.R.B. and E.S.; validation, G.S., H.M.-N., P.R. and A.R.B.; writing—original draft, Y.K. and M.O.; writing—review and editing, Y.K., M.O. and Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Soroka University Medical Center (protocol code 0025-16-SOR; date of approval 6 April 2022).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained prior to a telephone interview.
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting reported results will be provided by the corresponding author upon request.
Acknowledgments
Novack Lena, Soroka Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Correction Statement
This article has been republished with a minor correction to the Informed Consent Statement. This change does not affect the scientific content of the article.
References
- Genova, A.; Dix, O.; Saefan, A.; Thakur, M.; Hassan, A. Carpal tunnel syndrome: A review of literature. Cureus 2020, 12, e7333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Treatment and Prognosis. Available online: https://www-uptodate-com.bengurionu.idm.oclc.org/contents/carpal-tunnel-syndrome-treatment-and-prognosis (accessed on 14 June 2024).
- Padua, L.; Coraci, D.; Erra, C.; Pazzaglia, C.; Paolasso, I.; Loreti, C.; Caliandro, P.; Hobson-Webb, L.D. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 1273–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pace, V.; Marzano, F.; Placella, G. Update on surgical procedures for carpal tunnel syndrome: What is the current evidence and practice? What are the future research directions? World J. Orthop. 2023, 14, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Levine, D.W.; Simmons, B.P.; Koris, M.J.; Daltroy, L.H.; Hohl, G.G.; Fossel, A.H.; Katz, J.N. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1993, 75, 1585–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heybeli, N.; Ozerdemoglu, R.; Aksoy, O.; Mumcu, E. Functional and symptomatic scoring used for the assessment of outcome in carpal tunnel release. Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc. 2001, 35, 147–151. [Google Scholar]
- Multanen, J.; Ylinen, J.; Karjalainen, T.; Ikonen, J.; Häkkinen, A.; Repo, J.P. Structural validity of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and its short version, the 6-Item CTS symptoms scale: A Rasch analysis one year after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 21, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nancollas, M.P.; Peimer, C.A.; Wheeler, D.R.; Sherwin, F.S. Long-term results of carpal tunnel release. J. Hand Surg. 1995, 20, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, Q.; Macdermid, J.C. Is surgical intervention more effective than non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome? A systematic review. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2011, 6, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, C.Q.; Lai, S.W.; Tay, S.C. Long-term outcome of carpal tunnel release surgery in patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Bone Jt. J. 2017, 99, 1348–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Louie, D.; Earp, B.; Blazar, P. Long-term outcomes of carpal tunnel release: A critical review of the literature. Hand 2012, 7, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Conzen, C.; Conzen, M.; Rübsamen, N.; Mikolajczyk, R. Predictors of the patient-centered outcomes of surgical carpal tunnel release–a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2016, 17, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Kleermaeker, F.G.; Meulstee, J.; Bartels, R.H.; Verhagen, W.I. Long-term outcome after carpal tunnel release and identification of prognostic factors. Acta Neurochir. 2019, 161, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huisstede, B.M.; van den Brink, J.; Randsdorp, M.S.; Geelen, S.J.; Koes, B.W. Effectiveness of surgical and postsurgical interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome—A systematic review. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018, 99, 1660–1680.e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alimohammadi, E.; Bagheri, S.R.; Hadidi, H.; Rizevandi, P.; Abdi, A. Carpal tunnel surgery: Predictors of clinical outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 21, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).