Next Article in Journal
Can Oncologists Predict Survival for Patients with Progressive Disease After Standard Chemotherapies?
Previous Article in Journal
Patient Perceptions of a Comprehensive Cancer Navigation Service
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perioperative Chemotherapy for Gastroesophageal Cancer in British Columbia: A Multicentre Experience

British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Med Oncol, 600 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21(2), 77-83; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1788
Submission received: 2 January 2014 / Revised: 4 February 2014 / Accepted: 3 March 2014 / Published: 1 April 2014

Abstract

Background: In 2006, perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (ECF), compared with surgery alone, demonstrated a significant survival benefit in resectable gastroesophageal cancers. We report the results of our experience with that protocol. Methods: The BC Cancer Agency (BCAA) is a multicentre institution that treats most oncology patients for the province. Characteristics of the 83 bcca patients with localized gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or lower esophageal cancer who initiated perioperative chemotherapy either ecf or epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX) from 2008 to 2011 were abstracted to an anonymous database and analyzed. Results: Of the 83 patients in the cohort [66 men; median age: 62 years (range: 37–79 years)], 87.9% completed 3 cycles of perioperative chemotherapy, and 93.9% (n = 78) underwent an attempt at surgery (2 patients died of chemotherapy toxicities, 1 refused surgery, and 2 developed disease progression before surgery). In 11 of the surgeries (14.1%), tumours could not be resected because of unresectability (n = 1), liver metastasis (n = 1), and peritoneal carcinomatosis (n = 9). One patient died of surgical complications. The 6 patients (7.2%) who achieved a pathologic complete response are all alive and recurrence-free. Of 46 patients (55.4%) who subsequently began postoperative chemotherapy, 44.5% completed 3 cycles. Estimated median survival was 40.3 months. Weight loss was the only significant prognostic factor for worse overall survival. Conclusions: Our multicentre experience confirmed the feasibility of the MAGIC protocol in a real-world scenario and showed that ECX is also an adequate regimen in the perioperative setting. Weight loss was the only significant prognostic factor for worse overall survival. All patients who achieved a pathologic complete response are recurrence-free after a median followup of 40.3 months.
Keywords: gastric cancer; esophageal cancer; gastroesophageal cancer; perioperative chemotherapy gastric cancer; esophageal cancer; gastroesophageal cancer; perioperative chemotherapy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peixoto, R.D.; Cheung, W.Y.; Lim, H.J. Perioperative Chemotherapy for Gastroesophageal Cancer in British Columbia: A Multicentre Experience. Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1788

AMA Style

Peixoto RD, Cheung WY, Lim HJ. Perioperative Chemotherapy for Gastroesophageal Cancer in British Columbia: A Multicentre Experience. Current Oncology. 2014; 21(2):77-83. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1788

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peixoto, R.D., W.Y. Cheung, and H.J. Lim. 2014. "Perioperative Chemotherapy for Gastroesophageal Cancer in British Columbia: A Multicentre Experience" Current Oncology 21, no. 2: 77-83. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1788

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop