Journal Description
Current Oncology
Current Oncology
is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal published online by MDPI (from Volume 28 Issue 1-2021). Established in 1994, the journal represents a multidisciplinary medium for clinical oncologists to report and review progress in the management of this disease. The Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists (CAMO), the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology (CAPO), the Canadian Association of General Practitioners in Oncology (CAGPO), the Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC), the Canadian Leukemia Study Group (CLSG) and others are affiliated with the journal and their members receive a discount on the article processing charges.
- Open Access— free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
- High Visibility: indexed within Scopus, SCIE (Web of Science), PubMed, MEDLINE, PMC, Embase, and other databases.
- Journal Rank: JCR - Q2 (Oncology)
- Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 19.8 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 2.4 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the second half of 2024).
- Recognition of Reviewers: APC discount vouchers, optional signed peer review, and reviewer names published annually in the journal.
Impact Factor:
2.8 (2023);
5-Year Impact Factor:
2.9 (2023)
Latest Articles
Current and Future Directions Using Virtual Avenues for Care Delivery Across the Cancer Continuum
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(5), 249; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050249 - 24 Apr 2025
Abstract
Oncology nurses have long been at the forefront of virtual care, transitioning from telenursing to technology-driven delivery methods that address the evolving needs of cancer patients. Initially developed to overcome barriers to care for rural and underserved populations, virtual care has grown into
[...] Read more.
Oncology nurses have long been at the forefront of virtual care, transitioning from telenursing to technology-driven delivery methods that address the evolving needs of cancer patients. Initially developed to overcome barriers to care for rural and underserved populations, virtual care has grown into a critical component of oncology practice. Oncology nurses play a central role in providing timely, personalized, and holistic care, leveraging tools such as remote monitoring, patient-reported outcomes, and mHealth platforms. However, the rapid adoption of virtual care demands a broader focus to sustain its impact. This commentary explores the need to clearly define the role of oncology nurses in virtual care, emphasizing leadership in digital health, the integration of hybrid care models, and workforce training. By addressing these priorities, virtual care can continue to enhance patient outcomes, strengthen nursing-led interventions, and expand the scope of oncology nursing, positioning it as an essential and enduring facet of cancer care delivery.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Reviews in Section "Oncology Nursing")
Open AccessArticle
The Influence of Poverty and Rurality on Colorectal Cancer Survival by Race/Ethnicity: An Analysis of SEER Data with a Census Tract-Level Measure of Persistent Poverty
by
Steven S. Coughlin, Meng-Han Tsai, Jorge Cortes, Malcolm Bevel and Marlo Vernon
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(5), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050248 - 23 Apr 2025
Abstract
Purpose: Because of shared mechanisms such as decreased access to health care, rurality and poverty may act synergistically to decrease colorectal cancer (CRC) survival. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of SEER data (22 registries) with census tract-level measures of poverty/rurality for
[...] Read more.
Purpose: Because of shared mechanisms such as decreased access to health care, rurality and poverty may act synergistically to decrease colorectal cancer (CRC) survival. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of SEER data (22 registries) with census tract-level measures of poverty/rurality for the period 2006–2015. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regressions were applied to examine the independent and intersectional associations of persistent poverty and rurality on 5-year cause-specific CRC survival across five racial/ethnic groups. Results: Among 532,868 CRC patients, non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) demonstrated lower 5-year survival probability (64.2% vs. 68.3% in non-Hispanic Whites [NHW], 66.5% in American Indian/Alaska Natives [AI/AN], 72.1% in Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 68.7% in Hispanic groups) (p-value < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, CRC patients living in rural areas with poverty were at a 1.2–1.6-fold increased risk of CRC death than those who did not live in these areas in five racial/ethnic groups. In particular, AI/AN patients living in rural areas with poverty were 66% more likely to die from CRC (95% CI, 1.32, 2.08). Conclusions: CRC patients who live in rural or poverty areas in SEER areas in the U.S. have a poorer survival compared with those who do not live in such areas regardless of race/ethnicity. Significantly greater risk of CRC death was observed in AI/ANs. Impact: Patient navigators, community education or screening, and other health care system interventions may be helpful to address these disparities by socioeconomic status, race, and geographic residence. Multi-level interventions aimed at institutional racism and medical mistrust may also be helpful.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastrointestinal Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
COVID-19 Pandemic’s Effects on Breast Cancer Screening, Staging at Diagnosis at Presentation, Oncologic Management, and Immediate Reconstruction: A Canadian Perspective
by
Adolfo Alejandro Lopez Rios, Alissa Dozois, Alexander T. Johnson, Toros Canturk and Jing Zhang
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(5), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050247 - 23 Apr 2025
Abstract
Background: Did the COVID-19 pandemic lead to delays in breast cancer management, impacting treatment recommendations? The goal of this study was to assess the pandemic’s effect on breast cancer treatment and management practices. Methods: This study aimed to assess the pandemic’s effect on
[...] Read more.
Background: Did the COVID-19 pandemic lead to delays in breast cancer management, impacting treatment recommendations? The goal of this study was to assess the pandemic’s effect on breast cancer treatment and management practices. Methods: This study aimed to assess the pandemic’s effect on breast cancer treatment from March 2018 to February 2020 (pre-pandemic) and March 2020 to February 2022 (during the pandemic) in Canada. A retrospective cohort study at The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada, compared breast cancer patients diagnosed in the two years before and after the pandemic’s onset. The study examined patient demographics, cancer stages, treatment timelines, and procedures, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and surgical treatment. Descriptive statistics and frequencies identified changes. The study is limited to a single institution, which may restrict generalizability. Inclusion criteria focused on female patients over 18 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer, excluding recurrent cases. Stage IV patients were included, but further details on their management are needed. Results: Breast cancer diagnoses decreased from 2577 before the pandemic to 2290 after its onset. Surgeries decreased from 1226 to 1013 (p < 0.020), while neoadjuvant endocrine therapy increased from 148 to 169, and adjuvant radiotherapy rose from 586 to 722 (p < 0.001). The study revealed a decrease in breast cancer diagnoses and surgeries during the pandemic, with a rise in non-surgical treatments. Conclusions: These changes indicate significant shifts in breast cancer management due to the pandemic. The decrease in surgical treatments and increase in non-surgical options such as endocrine therapy and radiotherapy suggest adaptations in clinical practices to cope with the challenges posed by the pandemic. Understanding these shifts is crucial for developing strategies to mitigate the impact of future disruptions on breast cancer care and ensuring optimal patient outcomes.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Breast Cancer)
Open AccessArticle
Use of Radiofrequency in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Small Tumors: A Novel Technique
by
Matías Larrañaga, Helga Ibañez, Jessica Pfeifer, Cristobal Román, Rubén Olivares, José Antonio Salvadó, José Miguel Cabello, Sergio Moreno, Renato Cabello, Carmen Franco and Alfredo Velasco
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(5), 246; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050246 - 23 Apr 2025
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: Radiofrequency is standardized for ablating small renal tumors, but evidence regarding its effects remains limited. Partial nephrectomy, the gold standard, often leads to hemorrhagic complications and irreversible renal damage due to hilum clamping. To mitigate these risks, we propose a
[...] Read more.
Introduction and Objectives: Radiofrequency is standardized for ablating small renal tumors, but evidence regarding its effects remains limited. Partial nephrectomy, the gold standard, often leads to hemorrhagic complications and irreversible renal damage due to hilum clamping. To mitigate these risks, we propose a novel technique that replaces clamping with radiofrequency ablation of the tumor for hemostasis in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Methods: We report on 357 consecutive patients with T1a renal tumors treated with robot-assisted surgery between 2010 and July 2024. Radiofrequency was used peri-tumorally for hemostasis, followed by complete lesion enucleation. Follow-up included ultrasound and creatinine at 1 month, CT scans at months 3 and 9, and then annually for 5 years. Results: The median age was 60.2 years, with 251 men (70.3%). The median tumor size was 22 mm, and the median blood loss was 15 mL. Hemorrhagic complications occurred in eight patients (2.2%), with one requiring a blood transfusion (0.28%). A total of 30 patients experienced transient stage 1 acute kidney disease (8.4%), with no significant change in median 74.92 mL/min/1.77 m2 vs. 78.77 mL/min/1.77 m2 vs. (p-value 0.15). The median follow-up was 48.2 months, with no tumor recurrence at the treated site. Renal cell carcinoma was found in 83.7% of tumors. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this series represent the largest global undertaking of renal tumor treatment using peripheral radiofrequency ablation without clamping, demonstrating optimal surgical and oncological outcomes, lower morbidity, and fewer complications compared to those noted in the revised literature regarding traditional clamping techniques.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Surgical Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Prognosis of Cancer Patients with Severe Hyponatremia in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study from the National Cancer Center of China
by
Qinglong Jiang, Xi Zhang, Chao Wang, Rong Qin, Rui Sun, Shengling Qin, Cong Zhao, Zhiyong Li, Wenjie Zhu and Minghua Cong
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(5), 245; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050245 - 23 Apr 2025
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of profound hyponatremia in solid cancer patients admitted to the oncologic emergency department. Methods: We gathered data retrospectively from cancer patients who visited the emergency department of the
[...] Read more.
Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of profound hyponatremia in solid cancer patients admitted to the oncologic emergency department. Methods: We gathered data retrospectively from cancer patients who visited the emergency department of the National Cancer Center of China between October 2019 and February 2023 with a serum sodium (Na) level of less than 125 mmol/L. The demographic and clinical characteristics, medical history, admission symptoms, laboratory parameters, and outcomes of the patients were recorded. Results: This study comprised 307 patients with severe hyponatremia in total. With 39.4% of all tumors being lung cancer (n = 121), nausea and vomiting were the most common admission symptoms for patients with severe hyponatremia. The 30-day mortality rate of profound hyponatremia cancer patients in the emergency department was 13.4%. The albumin level (p < 0.001), the hemoglobin level (p = 0.033), the TNM stage (p = 0.004), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) score (p < 0.001), hypocalcemia (p = 0.006), renal insufficiency (p = 0.035), and the efficacy of sodium supplementation (p = 0.006) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that a lower albumin level (OR 0.924, 95% CI 0.861–0.991, p = 0.028) and higher ECOG score (OR 8.443, 95% CI 3.568–19.976, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. The overall survival of emergency cancer patients with severe hyponatremia was also examined. The results of the COX regression analysis demonstrated that the efficacy of sodium supplementation (OR = 2.643, 95% CI 1.593–4.386, p < 0.001), a low albumin level (OR = 0.654, 95% CI 0.463–0.923, p = 0.016), the TNM stage (OR = 4.606, 95% CI 2.846–7.455), and a higher ECOG score (OR = 1.738, 95% CI 1.292–2.338, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for overall survival. Conclusions: The clinical manifestations of severe hyponatremia in emergency cancer patients are varied. Hypoalbuminemia and a higher ECOG score are independent risk factors for 30-day mortality and overall survival. Severe hyponatremia patients with a high ECOG score and/or a low albumin level should be monitored and followed more closely.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Palliative and Supportive Care)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessReview
Technical Innovations and Complex Cases in Robotic Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review
by
Giacomo Cusumano, Giuseppe Calabrese, Filippo Tommaso Gallina, Francesco Facciolo, Pierluigi Novellis, Giulia Veronesi, Stefano Viscardi, Filippo Lococo, Elisa Meacci, Alberto Terminella, Gaetano Romano, Cristina Zirafa, Franca Melfi, Stefano Margaritora and Marco Chiappetta
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(5), 244; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050244 - 22 Apr 2025
Abstract
For over two decades, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has revolutionized thoracic oncology. With enhanced visualization, dexterity, and precision, RATS has reduced blood loss, shortened hospital stays, and sped up recovery compared to traditional surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The use of 3D
[...] Read more.
For over two decades, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has revolutionized thoracic oncology. With enhanced visualization, dexterity, and precision, RATS has reduced blood loss, shortened hospital stays, and sped up recovery compared to traditional surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The use of 3D high-definition imaging and articulated instruments allows for complex resections and advanced lymph node assessment. RATS delivers oncological outcomes similar to open surgery and VATS, with high rates of complete (R0) resections and acceptable complication rates. Its minimally invasive nature promotes quicker recovery. Advances in imaging software and augmented reality further enhance surgical accuracy and reduce intraoperative risks. However, RATS has some limitations, including high costs and a lack of tactile feedback, and certain complex procedures, such as extended resections and intrapericardial interventions, remain challenging. With growing experience and technological advances, RATS shows promise in reducing morbidity, improving quality of life, and expanding access to advanced oncologic care. This article reviews the evolution, benefits, and limitations of RATS in NSCLC treatment, highlighting its emerging role in managing complex cases.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Thoracic Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Predictors of Colon Cancer Screening Among the Saudi Population at Primary Healthcare Settings in Riyadh
by
Amani Alharthy, Mamdouh M. Shubair, Badr F. Al-Khateeb, Lubna Alnaim, Emad Aljohani, Nada Kareem Alenazi, Maha Alamodi Alghamdi, Khadijah Angawi, Rawabi M. Alsayer, Naif M. Alhawiti and Ashraf El-Metwally
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(5), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050243 - 22 Apr 2025
Abstract
(1) Background: This study aims to identify the sociodemographic, behavioural, and systemic predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among primary healthcare attendees in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to inform targeted interventions and policy strategies. (2) Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between March and
[...] Read more.
(1) Background: This study aims to identify the sociodemographic, behavioural, and systemic predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among primary healthcare attendees in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to inform targeted interventions and policy strategies. (2) Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between March and July 2023 across 48 randomly selected primary healthcare centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The target population for this study was adults aged 18 and above attending primary healthcare centers in Riyadh. Multi-stage random sampling was used to recruit participants. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of CRC screening. (3) Results: CRC screening uptake was found to be only 4.2%. Age was a significant predictor, with individuals aged 50–75 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50–2.42) and those aged 75 years or older (AOR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.01–1.87) being more likely to undergo screening compared to younger individuals. Insurance coverage strongly influenced screening behaviour (AOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.37–1.96). Smokers were nearly four times more likely to participate in screening than non-smokers (AOR: 3.87, 95% CI: 3.21–4.69), and physical activity was positively associated with screening (AOR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.11–1.82). (4) Conclusions: CRC screening uptake in Riyadh is critically low, highlighting the need for targeted public health interventions. Key predictors such as age, insurance coverage, smoking, and physical activity underscore the importance of addressing sociodemographic disparities and promoting health awareness. The findings emphasize the need for culturally tailored educational campaigns, improved healthcare access, and enhanced screening programs to increase uptake.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastrointestinal Oncology)
Open AccessReview
Glioblastoma in NF1: A Unique Entity—A Literature Review Focusing on Surgical Implication and Our Experience
by
Elisa Garbin, Lorenzo Nicolè, Salima Magrini, Yuri Ceccaroni, Luca Denaro, Luca Basaldella and Marta Rossetto
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 242; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040242 - 21 Apr 2025
Abstract
Glioblastoma in patients affected by NF1 germline mutation (NF1-associated GBM) represents a unique heterogeneous clinical and pathological entity. We have reviewed the few cases reported in the literature and they seem to have a better response to standard therapy and overall survival than
[...] Read more.
Glioblastoma in patients affected by NF1 germline mutation (NF1-associated GBM) represents a unique heterogeneous clinical and pathological entity. We have reviewed the few cases reported in the literature and they seem to have a better response to standard therapy and overall survival than GBM in the non-NF1 population. We present two cases of long-survival NF1 patients with GBM. Case 1 was a 38-year-old woman with cerebellar GBM who underwent surgical asportation and the Stupp protocol many times with an overall survival of 117 months. Case 2 was a 47-year-old woman with GBM in the eloquent area of the right frontal lobe; she underwent surgical asportation and the Stupp protocol with an overall survival of 25 months. The data analysis demonstrates that NF1-associated GBM patients could be considered long-term survivors.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment for Glioma: Retrospect and Prospect)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessConference Report
40th Annual CAPO Conference—Responding to the Human Experience of Cancer and Caring for the Soul: Building on 40 Years of Global Leadership in Psychosocial Oncology
by
Peter Traversa and Doris Howell
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 241; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040241 - 20 Apr 2025
Abstract
On behalf of the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, we are pleased to present the Abstracts from the 2025 Annual Conference, titled “Responding to the Human Experience of Cancer and Caring for the Soul: Building on 40 years of global leadership in psychosocial
[...] Read more.
On behalf of the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, we are pleased to present the Abstracts from the 2025 Annual Conference, titled “Responding to the Human Experience of Cancer and Caring for the Soul: Building on 40 years of global leadership in psychosocial oncology”. The 40th Annual CAPO Conference was held in Toronto from 23 April 2025 to 25 April 2025. In an era marked by the rapid advancement of biologically focused precision medicine, it is imperative to redirect our attention towards the human experience of illness and the soul of medicine. Biomedicine has conceptualized illness in ways that have proved profoundly productive from a curative and biological point of view. But it cannot—and it does not pretend to—illuminate the experience of living with it. (Hurwitz 2009). This conference aims to delve into the intricate interplay between cutting-edge biomedical technologies inclusive of artificial intelligence and big data and the deeply personal narratives of individuals navigating illness. By shifting the focus from mere disease pathology to encompassing the holistic human experience, we aspire to foster a more compassionate and patient-centered approach to healthcare with psychosocial support at the core of humanistic care that can improve survival and well-being in all aspects of a whole-person approach to illness. Through interdisciplinary dialogue and introspection, we endeavor to illuminate the profound connection between mind, body, and spirit in the practice of medicine, reaffirming the timeless significance of empathy, understanding, and human connection in healing and psychosocial aspects of care as fundamental to living well with cancer. This conference brought together key stakeholders including multidisciplinary professionals from nursing, psychology, psychiatry, social work, spiritual care, nutrition, medicine, rehabilitation medicine, occupational health and radiation therapy for both adult and pediatric populations. Participants included clinicians, researchers, educators in cancer care, community-based organizations and patient representatives. Patients, caregivers and family members presented abstracts that speak to their role in managing cancer experiences and care. Over two hundred (200) abstracts were submitted for presentation as symposia, 20-minute oral presentations, 10-minute oral presentations, 90-minute workshops and poster presentations. We congratulate all the presenters on their research work and contribution.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Psychosocial Oncology)
Open AccessArticle
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Contemporary Advanced Prostate Cancer Treatment Sequences
by
Valentyn Litvin, Armen G. Aprikian and Alice Dragomir
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 240; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040240 - 20 Apr 2025
Abstract
There has been a proliferation of novel treatments for the management of advanced prostate cancer (PCa), including androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). Although there are health economic analyses of novel PCa treatments, such as ARPIs for specific health states, there is a lack
[...] Read more.
There has been a proliferation of novel treatments for the management of advanced prostate cancer (PCa), including androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). Although there are health economic analyses of novel PCa treatments, such as ARPIs for specific health states, there is a lack of sequential analyses. Our paper aims to fill this gap. We developed a Monte Carlo Markov model to simulate the management of advanced PCa to end-of-life. We modeled patients who begin in metastatic and nonmetastatic castration-sensitive PCa (mCSPC and nmCSPC), with risk stratification for mCSPC, progressing to metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Using current guidelines and recent literature, we simulated admissible treatment sequences over these states along a 15-year horizon. We report the best treatment sequences in terms of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. We find that the most cost-effective use of ARPIs is early in advanced PCa for a cost-effectiveness threshold (CET) of CAD 100K per QALY. For a CET of CAD 50K per QALY, early ARPI use is most cost-effective in mCSPC-starting patients but not nmCSPC-starting. We conclude that the most cost-effective way to use ARPIs is when patients first enter advanced PCa. The most cost-effective ARPI at current Canadian prices is abiraterone, mostly due to abiraterone’s lower price level.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Health Economics)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients with Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by
Jennifer D. Deem, Zsolt Hepp and Joshua J. Carlson
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040239 - 19 Apr 2025
Abstract
Worldwide, about two million people are diagnosed with lung cancer each year, 85% of whom have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent progress in treating advanced/metastatic NSCLC with targeted therapies has shifted attention to early NSCLC (Stages I–IIIA) and perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant)
[...] Read more.
Worldwide, about two million people are diagnosed with lung cancer each year, 85% of whom have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent progress in treating advanced/metastatic NSCLC with targeted therapies has shifted attention to early NSCLC (Stages I–IIIA) and perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) systemic therapies. However, our comprehension of how targeted therapeutics are incorporated into care and their impact on patient outcomes is just starting to unfold. Methods: This retrospective observational study used a US nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database spanning January 2019–March 2024 and aimed to describe (1) eNSCLC patient demographic and clinical characteristics, (2) real-world neoadjuvant and adjuvant use, and (3) patient outcomes. Results: The study population included 4841 Stage IB–IIIA NSCLC patients with a mean age of 70.9 ± 8.6 years. The majority (69.9%) received definitive treatment: surgery (n = 2280), definitive radiation (n = 320), or definitive chemoradiation (n = 783), while 30.1% (n = 1458) did not. Many definitive treatment patients received some perioperative systemic therapy (surgery: 52.6%, radiation: 52.2%, chemoradiation: 75.5%). Neoadjuvant use was limited in all groups (surgery: 8.2%, radiation: 6.1%, chemoradiation: 11.6%). Among the 54.6% receiving adjuvant, immune checkpoint inhibitors were the most common choice for definitive radiation (39.1%) and chemoradiation (73.7%) patients, while surgical patients predominantly received platinum-doublet therapy (37.0%). Surgical patient outcomes were similar across all groups, while definitive chemoradiation or radiation patients without systemic therapy had lower survival rates. Conclusions: In this study, we found that although the majority of patients underwent some form of definitive treatment, adjuvant use was limited, and neoadjuvant use was rarely included in care. A crucial initial step in improving patient outcomes is to understand and address the underutilization of neoadjuvant/adjuvant systemic therapy for eNSCLC patients.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Thoracic Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessReview
Perspectives on Outpatient Delivery of Bispecific T-Cell Engager Therapies for Multiple Myeloma
by
Andrée-Anne Pelland, Mathilde Dumas, Émilie Lemieux-Blanchard, Richard LeBlanc, Julie Côté, Jean-Samuel Boudreault, Dominic Duquette, Rayan Kaedbey, Marc Lalancette, Frédéric Larose, Anna Nikonova, Michel Pavic, April Shamy, Jean Roy, Michael Sebag, Sabrina Trudel and Jean-Sébastien Claveau
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 238; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040238 - 18 Apr 2025
Abstract
In the past few years, a new promising therapy, called bispecific T-cell engager (TCE), has been developed and is now available in many countries for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. T-cell engagers are associated with sustained efficacy and progression-free survival benefits
[...] Read more.
In the past few years, a new promising therapy, called bispecific T-cell engager (TCE), has been developed and is now available in many countries for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. T-cell engagers are associated with sustained efficacy and progression-free survival benefits in patients with heavily treated myeloma. However, complications such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and infections complicate their administration, particularly in remote centers. This review discusses the key requirements for delivering TCEs therapies, focusing on outpatient delivery. We also outline the primary acute and chronic complications of TCE therapy and their management.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hematology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Trends in the Cost and Utilization of Publicly Reimbursed Cancer Medications Dispensed as Take-Home Treatments from 2017–2021
by
Ria Garg, Tara Dumont, Daniel McCormack, Mina Tadrous, Tonya Campbell, Kelvin Chan and Tara Gomes
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 237; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040237 - 18 Apr 2025
Abstract
Background: The cost and uptake of cancer medications dispensed as take-home treatments are not well understood. Therefore, in this study, we describe trends and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the utilization and cost of take-home cancer medications dispensed through the public payer system
[...] Read more.
Background: The cost and uptake of cancer medications dispensed as take-home treatments are not well understood. Therefore, in this study, we describe trends and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the utilization and cost of take-home cancer medications dispensed through the public payer system in Ontario, Canada. Methods: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional time-series analysis examining monthly and fiscal-year trends in the utilization and cost of take-home cancer medications reimbursed by the public payer between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2021, in Ontario, Canada. Our primary outcome was per-beneficiary spending. Total public payer spending and the number of unique beneficiaries who were dispensed take-home cancer medications were reported as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were reported overall and stratified by drug class. We used autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to assess the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the aforementioned trends. Results: Annual per-beneficiary spending on take-home cancer medications increased by 32.8% (from CAD 4422 in 2017/18 to CAD 6579 in 2020/21) over the study period. The rise in per-beneficiary spending was driven by the cost of medications within the small-molecule targeted therapy and immunotherapy drug classes, which accounted for three-quarters of total public payer spending on take-home cancer medications in 2020/21 despite being dispensed to less than 8% of beneficiaries. Upon the declaration of emergency for SARS-CoV-2, a short-term decline in per-beneficiary spending (CAD −179 per month; p-value < 0.01) was observed between March and June 2020. This temporary decline was driven by an increase in the number of beneficiaries (5582 per month; p-value < 0.01) receiving low-cost take-home cancer medications within the cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal therapy drug class without a corresponding rise in public payer spending. Conclusion: Future research should investigate barriers to the widespread uptake of take-home cancer medications during periods of public emergencies, particularly for high-cost drugs.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Health Economics)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Crizotinib Inhibits Viability, Migration, and Invasion by Suppressing the c-Met/PI3K/Akt Pathway in the Three-Dimensional Bladder Cancer Spheroid Model
by
Byeongdo Song, Danhyo Kim, Jin-Nyoung Ho, Van-Hung Le and Sangchul Lee
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040236 - 17 Apr 2025
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of crizotinib, a broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor against bladder cancer (BC) cells, based on a three-dimensional (3D) cell culture system. After proliferating cell masses (spheroids) using T24 cisplatin-naïve and T24R2 cisplatin-resistant human BC cell lines, the
[...] Read more.
We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of crizotinib, a broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor against bladder cancer (BC) cells, based on a three-dimensional (3D) cell culture system. After proliferating cell masses (spheroids) using T24 cisplatin-naïve and T24R2 cisplatin-resistant human BC cell lines, the spheroids were exposed to various crizotinib concentrations in order to derive an ideal crizotinib concentration to suppress cell survival, migration, and invasion. Crizotinib suppressed cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in both T24 and T24R2 BC cell lines under a 3D spheroid model, which was more appropriate than the conventional two-dimensional cell culture model. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed a reduced expression of E-cadherin and an enhanced expression of vimentin, suggesting EMT suppression and the subsequent suppression of tumor aggressiveness following crizotinib administration. Meanwhile, the expressions of apoptosis-related genes increased. Western blot analysis revealed that the expression levels of phosphorylated mesenchymal–epithelial transition factor (c-Met) and phosphorylated Akt decreased following crizotinib administration, suggesting that the antitumor effect of crizotinib can be associated with the inhibition of the phosphorylated activation of the c-Met/PI3K/Akt pathway. Crizotinib showed a potential antitumor effect on both cisplatin-naïve and cisplatin-resistant human BC cells, likely through c-Met-induced PI3K/Akt pathway inhibition.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genitourinary Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessBrief Report
Accelerating Oncology Drug Reimbursement in Canada: Impact of the CDA-AMC Time-Limited Recommendation and pCPA Temporary Access Process
by
Catherine Y. Lau, Arif Mitha and Allison Wills
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040235 - 17 Apr 2025
Abstract
The complex pathway for new drug reimbursement in Canada has been well documented. Drugs with promising early efficacy data may receive a Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) from Health Canada. For oncology drugs that receive NOC/c, the pathway through positive review by
[...] Read more.
The complex pathway for new drug reimbursement in Canada has been well documented. Drugs with promising early efficacy data may receive a Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) from Health Canada. For oncology drugs that receive NOC/c, the pathway through positive review by Canada’s Drug Agency (CDA-AMC) and subsequent public reimbursement can take over 500 days. To address this challenge, in September 2023, CDA-AMC announced a new Time-Limited Recommendation (TLR) category, and in parallel, the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) developed a set of principles and conditions for a Temporary Access Process (pTAP). This accelerated access pathway, the first of its kind in Canada, enables patients with advanced diseases to gain timely access to promising therapies while managing the uncertainties and risks associated with early approvals. This report provides a first assessment of the impact of the TLR-pTAP process on the reimbursement timelines for oncology drugs approved with NOC/c. Methods: The time from NOC/c approvals for oncology drugs between 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2024, to first provincial listings, and the timelines of the Health Canada, CDA-AMC, and pCPA review processes, were collected and evaluated. Results: Nine oncology NOC/c were granted during the selected period, of which three products, Columvi, Akeega, and Epkinly, received provincial listings, and the median time from regulatory approvals to provincial listings is 509 days (IQ range 306–544 days). One drug, Epkinly, has elected to adopt the TLR-pTAP pathway. Compared to the conventional reimbursement pathway—including for the drug Columvi, whose therapeutic profile is similar to that of Epkinly—the new pathway reduced the time to first provincial listing by over 200 days. A stepwise analysis indicates that the most significant accelerator within the TLR-pTAP pathway is the pCPA’s prioritization and processing of the file in parallel to the CDA-AMC’s health technology assessment (HTA) review process, rather than subsequently. Electing to file the HTA submission pre-NOC could have further accelerated timelines. No acceleration in each agency’s review time was observed. Conclusions: Participation in the TLR-pTAP pathway can help mitigate concerns over uncertainties associated with novel therapies while providing timelier access for patients with life-threatening diseases.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cost Effectiveness vs. Affordability in the Age of Targeted Drug Therapies)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessSystematic Review
Supervised Physical Activity Interventions in Children and Adolescents with Cancer Undergoing Treatment—A Systematic Review
by
Nadja Battanta, Krystyna Lange, Sabine V. Kesting, Daniela Marx-Berger, Philip Heesen, Hannah Ober, Aron Onerup, Saskia M. F. Pluijm, Eva Scheler, Emma J. Verwaaijen, Katrin Scheinemann and Maria Otth
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 234; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040234 - 17 Apr 2025
Abstract
Background: A cancer diagnosis and its treatment often disrupt a child’s and adolescent’s normal level of physical activity, which plays a vital role in their development and health. They are therefore often less physically active during treatment than before the diagnosis or compared
[...] Read more.
Background: A cancer diagnosis and its treatment often disrupt a child’s and adolescent’s normal level of physical activity, which plays a vital role in their development and health. They are therefore often less physically active during treatment than before the diagnosis or compared to healthy peers. Today, there is no comprehensive overview of the safety, feasibility, clinical effectiveness, and potentially long-lasting impact of physical activity (PA) interventions in this population. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines to evaluate studies on PA interventions during cancer treatment in children and adolescents up to 25 years of age. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute’s critical appraisal tools to assess the risk of bias. Due to the heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes, we used descriptive approaches only to present the results. Results: Half of the 21 included studies were randomized controlled trials (10/21). PA interventions were found to be safe and feasible when tailored to the patient’s age, treatment phase, and clinical condition. Most studies reported improvements in physical fitness, strength, and quality of life, with some reductions in fatigue. Variability in interventions and outcomes, along with small sample sizes and heterogeneous patient populations, made it difficult to draw clear conclusions. Conclusions: PA appears to be a feasible and, in terms of injuries, safe adjunct to cancer treatment in children and adolescents. Despite promising trends, further large-scale, multicenter trials with standardized protocols are needed to better establish the long-term benefits and optimal interventions.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Advancements in Section "Childhood, Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology")
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessArticle
Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in Head and Neck Cancer Patients with Late Radiation-Associated Dysphagia: Swallowing Safety, Efficacy, and Dysphagia Phenotype
by
Marco Gitto, Francesco Mozzanica, Vincenzo Porpiglia, Luca Morelli, Aurora Ninfa, Alessandro Selvagio, Sara Rocca, Nicole Pizzorni and Antonio Schindler
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040233 - 16 Apr 2025
Abstract
Late radiation-associated dysphagia (late-RAD) remains a challenge in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship, despite advancements in treatment methods. Although Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) stands as the preferred diagnostic approach for oropharyngeal dysphagia assessment in the HNC population, current studies lack
[...] Read more.
Late radiation-associated dysphagia (late-RAD) remains a challenge in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship, despite advancements in treatment methods. Although Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) stands as the preferred diagnostic approach for oropharyngeal dysphagia assessment in the HNC population, current studies lack a FEES-derived swallowing parameter characterization and phenotypic classification within this specific cohort. This study sought to employ FEES-based assessment to characterize swallowing safety and efficacy profiles, identify distinct phenotypes in HNC patients suffering from late-RAD, and examine potential correlations between safety and efficacy parameters. A retrospective analysis included twenty-four post-radiotherapy HNC patients evaluated using standardized FEES protocols across three bolus consistencies (liquid, semisolid, and solid). Swallowing safety was quantified using the Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS), while efficacy was measured via the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS). Additionally, six distinct dysphagia phenotypes were characterized within the cohort. Propulsion deficit was the predominant phenotype (92%), followed by delayed pharyngeal phase (37.5%) and protective deficit (25%), with 46% of patients exhibiting multiple phenotypes. Unsafe swallowing occurred most frequently with liquid consistency (62.5%), while residue was most prevalent with semisolid (82.6% valleculae, 52.2% pyriform sinuses) and solid consistencies (92.3% valleculae, 53.8% pyriform sinuses). Significant correlations were found between penetration–aspiration and pharyngeal residue scores across consistencies (p < 0.05). FEES examination revealed distinct phenotypes in late radiation-associated dysphagia, with a predominance of propulsion deficit and significant interdependence between safety and efficacy parameters.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Head and Neck Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessReview
Advances in Targeted and Systemic Therapy for Salivary Gland Carcinomas: Current Options and Future Directions
by
Sushanth Sreenivasan, Rahim A. Jiwani, Richard White, Veli Bakalov, Ryan Moll, Joseph Liput and Larisa Greenberg
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 232; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040232 - 16 Apr 2025
Abstract
Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) represent a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies accounting for 3–6% of all head and neck cancers. While surgical resection and radiotherapy remain the standard for locoregional control, systemic treatment is indicated for recurrent or metastatic disease. Advances in
[...] Read more.
Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) represent a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies accounting for 3–6% of all head and neck cancers. While surgical resection and radiotherapy remain the standard for locoregional control, systemic treatment is indicated for recurrent or metastatic disease. Advances in molecular profiling have identified actionable targets such as NTRK gene fusions, HER2, immune checkpoint regulators, androgen receptors, and RET receptors. These have facilitated the development of targeted therapies, including TRK inhibitors, HER2-directed agents, and androgen receptor modulators, as well as emerging combinations of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite these advancements, challenges such as resistance mechanisms and limited therapeutic efficacy persist. Overall response rates remain relatively low across most systemic therapies, reflecting a persistent unmet clinical need. This review discusses the current landscape of treatment options and explores promising clinical trials and future directions to enhance outcomes for patients with SGCs.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Head and Neck Oncology)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessSystematic Review
Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
by
Toni Zhong, Glenn G. Fletcher, Muriel Brackstone, Simon G. Frank, Renee Hanrahan, Vivian Miragias, Christiaan Stevens, Danny Vesprini, Alyssa Vito and Frances C. Wright
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 231; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040231 - 16 Apr 2025
Abstract
Breast reconstruction after mastectomy improves the quality of life for many patients with breast cancer. There is uncertainty regarding eligibility criteria for reconstruction, timing (immediate or delayed—with or without radiotherapy), outcomes of nipple-sparing compared to skin-sparing mastectomy, selection criteria and surgical factors influencing
[...] Read more.
Breast reconstruction after mastectomy improves the quality of life for many patients with breast cancer. There is uncertainty regarding eligibility criteria for reconstruction, timing (immediate or delayed—with or without radiotherapy), outcomes of nipple-sparing compared to skin-sparing mastectomy, selection criteria and surgical factors influencing outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy, prepectoral versus subpectoral implants, use of acellular dermal matrix, and use of autologous fat grafting. We conducted a systematic review of these topics to be used as the evidence base for an updated clinical practice guideline on breast reconstruction for Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario). The protocol was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42023409083. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched until August 2024, and 229 primary studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective non-randomized comparative studies; 5 randomized controlled trials were included. Results suggest nipple-sparing mastectomy is oncologically safe, provided there is no clinical, radiological, or pathological indication of nipple-areolar complex involvement. Surgical factors, including incision location, may affect rates of complications such as necrosis. Both immediate and delayed reconstruction have similar long-term outcomes; however, immediate reconstruction may result in better short to medium-term quality of life. Evidence on whether radiotherapy should modify the timing of initial reconstruction or expander-implant exchange was very limited; studies delayed reconstruction after radiotherapy by at least 3 months and, more commonly, at least 6 months to avoid the period of acute radiation injury. Radiation after immediate reconstruction is a reasonable option. Surgical complications are similar between prepectoral and dual-plane or subpectoral reconstruction; prepectoral placement may give a better quality of life due to lower rates of long-term complications such as pain and animation deformity. Autologous fat grafting was found to be oncologically safe; its use may improve quality of life and aesthetic results.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Breast Cancer)
►▼
Show Figures

Figure 1
Open AccessPerspective
LAG3, TIM3 and TIGIT: New Targets for Immunotherapy and Potential Associations with Radiotherapy
by
Camil Ciprian Mireștean, Roxana Irina Iancu and Dragoș Petru Teodor Iancu
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 230; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040230 - 15 Apr 2025
Abstract
The combination of immunotherapy and radiotherapy has demonstrated synergistic potential, especially when a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is administered. Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors or Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been assessed
[...] Read more.
The combination of immunotherapy and radiotherapy has demonstrated synergistic potential, especially when a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is administered. Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors or Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been assessed in both clinical and preclinical studies; the addition of radiotherapy activates immunomodulatory mechanisms materialized by an effect similar to “in situ” vaccination or the “abscopal” distant response of lesions outside the irradiation field. The new therapeutic targets (T cell immune-receptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), Lymphocyte activating gene 3 (LAG-3), and T cell Ig- and mucin-domain-containing molecule-3 (TIM-3)) associated with traditional ICIs and radiotherapy open new perspectives to the concept of immuno-radiotherapy. The dynamic evaluation of T lymphocyte expression involved in the antitumor immune response, both in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and in the tumor itself, could have biomarker value in assessing the response to combination therapy with traditional and new ICIs in association with irradiation. Preclinical data justify the initiation of clinical trials in various tumor pathologies to explore this concept.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Evolving Landscape of Precision Medicine in Radiation Oncology)

Journal Menu
► ▼ Journal Menu-
- Current Oncology Home
- Aims & Scope
- Editorial Board
- Reviewer Board
- Topical Advisory Panel
- Instructions for Authors
- Special Issues
- Topics
- Sections & Collections
- Article Processing Charge
- Indexing & Archiving
- Editor’s Choice Articles
- Most Cited & Viewed
- Journal Statistics
- Journal History
- Journal Awards
- Society Collaborations
- Conferences
- Editorial Office
Journal Browser
► ▼ Journal Browser-
arrow_forward_ios
Forthcoming issue
arrow_forward_ios Current issue - Volumes not published by MDPI
Highly Accessed Articles
Latest Books
E-Mail Alert
News
Topics
Topic in
Cancers, Cells, JCM, Radiation, Pharmaceutics, Applied Sciences, Nanomaterials, Current Oncology
Innovative Radiation Therapies
Topic Editors: Gérard Baldacchino, Eric Deutsch, Marie Dutreix, Sandrine Lacombe, Erika Porcel, Charlotte Robert, Emmanuelle Bourneuf, João Santos Sousa, Aurélien de la LandeDeadline: 30 April 2025
Topic in
Biomedicines, Current Oncology, Diagnostics, Gastrointestinal Disorders, JCM, Livers, Transplantology
Advances in Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease: From Physiological Mechanisms to Clinical Practice
Topic Editors: Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone, Gian Paolo CavigliaDeadline: 20 June 2025
Topic in
Biomolecules, CIMB, Sci. Pharm., Cancers, Current Oncology, Cells
The Role of Extracellular Vesicles as Modulators of the Tumor Microenvironment
Topic Editors: Nils Ludwig, Miroslaw J SzczepanskiDeadline: 30 June 2025
Topic in
Cancers, Diagnostics, JCM, Current Oncology, Gastrointestinal Disorders, Biomedicines, Therapeutics
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases: Novel Strategies of Diagnosis and Treatments
Topic Editors: Alessandro Coppola, Damiano Caputo, Roberta Angelico, Domenech Asbun, Chiara MazzarelliDeadline: 20 August 2025

Conferences
Special Issues
Special Issue in
Current Oncology
Evolution of Treatments of Prostate Cancer: From Biology to Current Advanced Technologies
Guest Editor: Fernando MunozDeadline: 30 April 2025
Special Issue in
Current Oncology
Cost Effectiveness vs. Affordability in the Age of Targeted Drug Therapies
Guest Editor: Ramy SalehDeadline: 30 April 2025
Special Issue in
Current Oncology
Sarcoma Surgeries: Oncological Outcomes and Prognostic Factors
Guest Editor: Mai-Kim GervaisDeadline: 30 April 2025
Special Issue in
Current Oncology
Biomarkers and Precision Medicine in Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies
Guest Editor: Morten LadekarlDeadline: 30 April 2025
Topical Collections
Topical Collection in
Current Oncology
New Insights into Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Collection Editor: Sazan Rasul
Topical Collection in
Current Oncology
New Insights into Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Collection Editors: Filippo Pesapane, Matteo Suter
Topical Collection in
Current Oncology
Editorial Board Members’ Collection Series in "Exercise and Cancer Management"
Collection Editors: Linda Denehy, Ravi Mehrotra, Nicole Culos-Reed
Topical Collection in
Current Oncology
Editorial Board Members’ Collection Series: Contemporary Perioperative Concepts in Cancer Surgery
Collection Editors: Vijaya Gottumukkala, Jörg Kleeff