Next Article in Journal
Acute Toxicity of Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Adherence to and Uptake of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Lessons Learned from a Clinical Practice Guideline on Chemotherapy Concomitant with Radiotherapy in Head-and-Neck Cancer
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Access to Oncology Consultation in a Cancer Cohort in Northeastern Ontario

1
Epidemiology, Outcomes and Evaluation Research, Northeast Cancer Centre, Sudbury, ON, Canada
2
Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
3
Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
4
Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, Canada
5
Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
6
Systemic Therapy Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Sudbury, ON, Canada
7
Cambrian College, Sudbury, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22(2), 69-75; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2309
Submission received: 5 January 2015 / Revised: 3 February 2015 / Accepted: 4 March 2015 / Published: 1 April 2015

Abstract

Background: To enhance cancer symptom management for residents of Sudbury–Manitoulin District, an ambulatory palliative clinic (pac) was established at the Northeast Cancer Centre of Health Sciences North. The pac is accessed from a medical or radiation oncology consultation. The primary purpose of the present population-based retrospective study was to estimate the percentage of cancer patients who died without ever having a medical or radiation oncology consultation. A secondary purpose was to determine factors associated with never having received one of those specialized consultations. Methods: Administrative data was obtained through the Ontario Cancer Data Linkage Project. For each index case, we constructed a timeline, in days, of all Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing codes and associated service dates starting with the primary cancer diagnosis and ending with death. Results: Within the 5-year study period (2004–2008), 6683 people in the area of interest with a valid record of primary cancer diagnosis died from any cause. Most (n = 5988, 89.6%) had 1 primary cancer diagnosis. For that subgroup, excluding those with a disease duration of 0 days (n = 67), about 18.4% (n = 1088) never had a consultation with a medical or radiation oncologist throughout their disease trajectory. Patients who were older or who resided in a rural area were significantly less likely to have had a consultation. Conclusions: Specific strategies directed toward older and rural patients might help to address this important access-to-care issue.
Keywords: health services accessibility; referral and consultation; rural health services; palliative care; medical records health services accessibility; referral and consultation; rural health services; palliative care; medical records

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Conlon, M.; Hartman, M.; Ballantyne, B.; Aubin, N.; Meigs, M.; Knight, A. Access to Oncology Consultation in a Cancer Cohort in Northeastern Ontario. Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2309

AMA Style

Conlon M, Hartman M, Ballantyne B, Aubin N, Meigs M, Knight A. Access to Oncology Consultation in a Cancer Cohort in Northeastern Ontario. Current Oncology. 2015; 22(2):69-75. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Conlon, M., M. Hartman, B. Ballantyne, N. Aubin, M. Meigs, and A. Knight. 2015. "Access to Oncology Consultation in a Cancer Cohort in Northeastern Ontario" Current Oncology 22, no. 2: 69-75. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2309

APA Style

Conlon, M., Hartman, M., Ballantyne, B., Aubin, N., Meigs, M., & Knight, A. (2015). Access to Oncology Consultation in a Cancer Cohort in Northeastern Ontario. Current Oncology, 22(2), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2309

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop