Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Reasons for Provincial Discordance in Cancer drug Funding—A Survey of Policymakers
Previous Article in Journal
General Practitioners in Oncology: Their Valuable Role Throughout the Cancer Care Trajectory
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Engaging Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice Guideline Development: A Pilot Study

1
Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
2
Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton, ON, Canada
3
Person-Centred Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25(4), 250-256; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3943
Submission received: 4 May 2018 / Revised: 6 June 2018 / Accepted: 9 July 2018 / Published: 1 August 2018

Abstract

Background: Patient engagement is a key quality component of cancer guideline development; however, the optimal strategy for engaging patients in guideline development remains unclear. The feasibility and efficacy of two patient engagement models was tested by Cancer Care Ontario’s cancer guideline development program, the Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC). Methods: In model 1, patients participated in the guideline development process as active members of a working group. In model 2, patients formed a separate consultation group to review project plans and recommendations generated by multiple working groups. Training included online resources (model 1) and an in-person orientation (model 2). The PEBC’s standard patient engagement process acted as a control. The study was conducted for 1 year. Surveys measured the satisfaction of patients and members of the guideline working groups with the process and the outcome of each model. Results: Three guideline projects used model 1 to engage patients, six projects used model 2 to receive feedback, and one project was used as a control group (14 patients total). Most participants, whatever the model, reported satisfaction with their experience. Key challenges to implementation included patient recruitment and long wait times between meetings (model 1), and difficulty focusing on the discussion topic and poor meeting attendance on the part of patients (model 2). Conclusions: The pilot study demonstrated that, although both models are feasible and effective for the engagement of patients in cancer guideline development, modifications are required to optimize their continued interest. The PEBC will use the study results to inform the implementation of a patient engagement strategy for its program.
Keywords: patient engagement; person-centred care; clinical practice guidelines; mixed methods patient engagement; person-centred care; clinical practice guidelines; mixed methods

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brouwers, M.C.; Vukmirovic, M.; Spithoff, K.; Zwaal, C.; McNair, S.; Peek, N. Engaging Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice Guideline Development: A Pilot Study. Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25, 250-256. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3943

AMA Style

Brouwers MC, Vukmirovic M, Spithoff K, Zwaal C, McNair S, Peek N. Engaging Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice Guideline Development: A Pilot Study. Current Oncology. 2018; 25(4):250-256. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3943

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brouwers, M.C., M. Vukmirovic, K. Spithoff, C. Zwaal, S. McNair, and N. Peek. 2018. "Engaging Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice Guideline Development: A Pilot Study" Current Oncology 25, no. 4: 250-256. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3943

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop