Next Article in Journal
Survival Outcome Differences Based on Treatments Used and Knowledge of the Primary Tumour Site for Patients with Cancer of Unknown and Known Primary in Ontario
Previous Article in Journal
Only If You View It through a Different Lens
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Subcutaneous Rituximab Administration on Canadian Systemic Therapy Suites

1
Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331 29th St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
2
Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
3
Hoffmann–La Roche Limited, Mississauga, ON, Canada
4
Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25(5), 300-306; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4231
Submission received: 10 July 2018 / Revised: 9 August 2018 / Accepted: 5 September 2018 / Published: 1 October 2018

Abstract

Background: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is the most common hematologic malignancy. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) constitute 55% of new nhl cases and are initially treated with rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy. Relative to intravenous (IV) rituximab, a subcutaneous (SC) formulation approved in 2016 has comparable pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety, and a greatly reduced administration time; it is also preferred by patients. The objective of the present study was to estimate the effect (on systemic therapy suite time and on the costs of drug acquisition and administration) of implementing SC rituximab in the initial chemoimmunotherapy for FL and DLBCL over 3 years in the Canadian market. Methods: An Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, U.S.A.)–based model was created with a population size based on epidemiologic data and current rituximab use, duration of use considering initial therapy, time savings for SC rituximab administration from published studies, costs from standard Canadian sources, and assumed uptake in implementing provinces of 65%, 75%, and 80% over 3 years. Key parameters and sensitivity analysis values were validated by clinical experts located in various Canadian jurisdictions. Costs are reported in 2017 Canadian dollars from the perspective of the health care system. Results: More than 3 years after implementation of SC rituximab, we estimated that 5762 Canadians would be receiving SC rituximab, resulting in savings of 128,715 hours in systemic therapy suite time and approximately $40 million in drug and administration costs. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the model is most sensitive to SC market uptake, number of induction therapy cycles, and eligible patients. Conclusions: Subcutaneous administration of rituximab can significantly reduce systemic therapy suite time and achieve substantial savings in drug and administration costs.
Keywords: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; rituximab; subcutaneous rituximab; intravenous rituximab; cost analyses Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; rituximab; subcutaneous rituximab; intravenous rituximab; cost analyses

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stewart, D.A.; Boudreault, J.S.; Maturi, B.; Boras, D.; Foley, R. Evaluation of Subcutaneous Rituximab Administration on Canadian Systemic Therapy Suites. Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25, 300-306. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4231

AMA Style

Stewart DA, Boudreault JS, Maturi B, Boras D, Foley R. Evaluation of Subcutaneous Rituximab Administration on Canadian Systemic Therapy Suites. Current Oncology. 2018; 25(5):300-306. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4231

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stewart, D.A., J.S. Boudreault, B. Maturi, D. Boras, and R. Foley. 2018. "Evaluation of Subcutaneous Rituximab Administration on Canadian Systemic Therapy Suites" Current Oncology 25, no. 5: 300-306. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4231

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop